Crash Test Award: 2006 Audi A4

[GamerAndReviewer]

2002???

[wallen2k9]

such a waste of money to do this fucking test,they should just make them sell them and let ppl drive them i mean really one way or another every single car is unsafe, if u care about safety so fucking much go by a 1950s car and put some seatbelts in it, but dont complain about mpg, its like this if u want good mpg ur going to be unsafe that is that

[MobileReign]

@wallen2k9 Well you know nothing. Carry on.

[cokefan3]

@wallen2k9 Ur fucking kidding me. So your telling us that the scientists shouldn't test cars capabilities of the amount of stress in an accident thus not knowing what to IMPROVE on the safety. If u get crashed by a truck in a 1950's car u have a ~10% chance of living. In a car such as the Audi A4, you'd probably have a <50% chance of living. You can be the dumbest moron on Internet. They aren't trying to make cars Immortal or w/e. And it's not called Wasting money, its called using it for good..

[joshuaracecar]

@wallen2k9 Wrong people do these tests to make cars safer (example compare a 1950's crash test with a 2010 model crash test)

[sonicxlc123]

he dummy do u need Allstate hand? are u in good hands! lol

[CEMEo7]

well if you know anything about audi you can tell the side impact is an 06, but point well taken, its an 02 in front impact.

[whattheheck1000]

I have a friend who drives one of these, a 2007 model. Makes me feel glad seeing the safety results of this car.

[warzniak]

first of all... stop calling it a 2002! It is a B6, which I guarantee that is a 2005.. When the B7 came out, the first year of it was a 2005.5, the b6 2005 and b7 are virtually the same cars.. All that had changed was the body and went from a 1.8t engine to a 2.0t engine..

[sssmeee]

wow no passanger detection? the door got bent, meh hondas do better...

[MrDraktis]

what?????

[whattheheck1000]

passenger detection was uncommon in 2002.

[sssmeee]

um its 2006 (stated in the title) and lol -3 for my opinion =/

[whattheheck1000]

but it was a 2002 model car in the front crash test.

[brewyn243]

this vid was made when audis were still ugly. NOW they are HOTT!!!!!!!!!

[BlackAstonMartin]

that would scare the shit out of me.

[johnnyzinho0]

not good but not bad too

[powerfoxz]

mirrors always goes 1st... haha boom! mirrors out!

[acroracing]

there are 2 different models in this carsh. but bouth do good.

[sjeffe32]

Model B6 and the faceliftede B7 is close to the same car...

[Dauerdurchfall]

Wow. That´s some pretty good quality.

[rhonamitratara]

It says 2002 audi on the car!

[harwell299]

its because the results apply to 2002 to 2008

audi A4's. If the structure doesn't

change, the institutes not going to

spend more money on a car that just

had some minor facia detailing, you know?

[acroracing]

u domb shit. there are 2 different audies in this video. first one is a b6 the second one is a b7. and there were many different changes to the A4 since 2002. dont give fals info to ppl when u dont know anything about a subject.

[harwell288]

oh, okayy...sorry don't get all offensive. im

only human. but i don't get it when your

saying "b6" and "b7?" whats that?

[acroracing]

google it. B7 audi and B6 Audi. They are diffrent models.

[gunter98]

Wow the side crash is one of the best I have seen.

[zloben9000]

the floor is too smooth,

there would be more damage if the car were standing on asphalt

[thaBogey]

thats crap. most of the impact is created by inertia not by friction...

so how smooth the floor is will make no real difference

[Walker832]

actually the smoothness of the floor DOES matter. it's like having the brakes on or off while being hit from behind