Notice that the lighting is 10 times better in dx10. The grass in dx9 just pops out, and the dx10 grass just blends in. Also notice the improved sun efffects, and the better waterfall. And also the improved geometry (the fireplace).
Do with me whatever you want, call me blind, but no matter how hard I tried to look, I didn't notice much of a difference. There IS a little difference here and there but honestly it's just barely noticeable. Actually I liked grass in DX9 more over DX0 tbh.
the water is different on dx10 you can see the reflection and the shaders but dx9 is better because the game will be faster then the dx10 for standerd graphics card
So just cus they turned on HDR, God Rays and made better textures, they're allowed to call it Dx 10? thats bullshit. All of those can be done on Dx9 Fuck Microsoft for not making Dx10 for XP.
It's obvious that this game was a DX10 benchmark tool as well as Lost Planet. They just added extra foilage and fx. I'm sure DX9 could've handled the same thing, but they need to get people to buy the cards. It's cool, though. I recently got a GTX 470. No problems here.
how can it be fake? do you even own a dx11 capable card? trust me, as an owner of a hd5870 and being a gfx enthusiast for more years than i can care remember, my first 3d card was a 3d blaster(rendition chipset) way back in the day, and i've been through every dx version, starting with win 95. so i'm more than qualified to say your comment is a dumb thing to even think of posting, just how can it be fake?
i prefer DX9 cause it seems way more polished with vivid colors.DX10 just "stains" the color giving a blurred resolution just adding some "effects" to the environment to give a "realistic" approach and better textures only on the environments that doesnt convince me M$.
I have yet to see a game that shows that DX10 is worth it. All I see is Microsoft showing the changes, and if you look at Crysis it is the same. Crysis looks nothing like it was suppose to do. All games released a "gameplay" video which is just CGI and a fake HUD.
Cryengine is just so toned down, so it could play on current hardware satisfactory. If you use custom config's, you can get the look it had in the gameplay videos.
Dx10 version has different textures all over the place, wth? Looks like they added spec and bump mapping to some objects as well, which can already be done in dx9 .Doesnt seem like a valid comparison ;/.
Anyways where can I download the dx9 benchmark? All I can seem to find is the dx10 benchmark to download.
if you have all that, you can run it. to max it out, most likely get an ati card (the game is biased towards ati) or a later nvidia (8800GT and up) 2gb of ram and a dual-core. you should run it at very nice framerates.
I've been looking at a lot of video's like this and I've realized that dx9 and dx10 ARE in fact significantly different, obviously, but it seems that what would normally be just skinned on dx9, look brilliantly textured in dx10.
the truth is that Call of Juarez got better graphics on the bark of the trees ( Adnvanced 3d textures) and the leaves is a lil bette here too. at least the leaves on the trees.
Ok it may have higher res textures on trees but Crysis' trees have a more natural look and better physics applied to them when it comes to wind, Call of Juarez's lighting engine, or lack thereof, kind of ruins them whereas. And what good is higher res textures on trees when everything around them looks like crap?
well truth be told that the textures on ground is extremely detailed in Coj with dx10. Play the gmane and u will learn. they are sharper then crysis if you look close
Better textures, lighting, shadows and water detail in direct x 10, although it is quite hard to spot some of these differences in these low quality youtube videos. Call of Juarez is a great game whatever settings you have it on!!
people just dont get it. just because a game uses dx10 doesn't mean it will have awsome quality, the game isn't usually directly written in dx or opgl it is written using a game engine like Gamebryo or Dark Engine it depends on the engine. dx just makes more features available to developers, its not a magic wand that instantly boosts quality like, maybe anti-aliaing. Its not like Thief: The Dark Project (1998, 3D RPG) would suddenly look like Crysis if it was converted or hacked to run in dx10.
dx10 is suck.This directx is eating many hardware resources and in most games difference between DX9 and DX10 is "little".
In call of juarez the diffence is huge but overall DX9 is better to use in comparison with DX10, because DX10 is DX9.0C with better effects and need a very good PC to run it smooth.
Well, compared to other fps's out there, it isn't exactly top of the line. But I guess, being the only DX10 fps that has a western theme, it earns its place.
add &fmt=18 to this video for a much higher quality which provides a more clear presentation of dx version. btw, &fmt=6 doesnt work in this vid even though it wouldve been better (since this vid has no audio and 6 gives better video but worse audio than 18. the thing about this video though is that u dont see two scenes side-by-side at the same time to really scrutinize and analyze. two seperate benchies put in split screen rather than the same bench in split-screen would give better results =]
I have played both GUN & COJ and i can say that GUN is more open it's like a western GTA. This is the thing that lacked in COJ, there are a lot of open spaces but it's dead no side quests or messing around, just a strait story with boundaries. But in COJ the story line is way more interesting, & the graphics are just wonderful! I loved both games but frankly saying, im waiting for a COJ with an open world or GUN with kicking graphics.
The water looks better, textures are higher quality and have more lighting effecting properties, better lighting, soft(-er) particles, longer drawdistance and the possibility to render more at the time.
I have a DX10 pc fucktart. I know what its like. Maybe you should just fucking try reading next time. I said in this game it looks shit. Alright. Get it? Want me to say it again?
well actually i cant see a much of the difference,i had dx9 with xp but right now i own vista and with dirextx10,but if i play something on both windows(i have 2 computers,one with xp and other with vista)i dont see any difference.
only thing DX10 brings is better lighting
the real deal would be DX11
SpadeAce90 1 month ago
call of juarez looks better in directx 10 because the directx 10 patch comes with improved graphics.
SuperThe86 2 months ago
yea bro is not a big diferents!!!!!!!
MegaSobolanuL 2 months ago
Comment removed
terorvlad 2 months ago
Only diference i see its that the direct x10 is shityer than direct x9
alin96dms 2 months ago
Only thing i see is that DX 10 is much brighter wich would make dx 9 much more awesomer to paly...
DizzyGh0st 5 months ago
Notice that the lighting is 10 times better in dx10. The grass in dx9 just pops out, and the dx10 grass just blends in. Also notice the improved sun efffects, and the better waterfall. And also the improved geometry (the fireplace).
MickehDaHuskeh 9 months ago
1:20 look at the difference...... the rock looks so much better in dx10.... and even better in dx 11.
EmilKrejberg 1 year ago
DX10 looks better but some games cant support it and that sucks
bloodernax 1 year ago 3
HAHAH IF YOU GOT RID OF THE LINE IN THE MIDDLE YOU WOULD NOT NO THE DIFFERENCE.ITS A ILLUSION PEOPLE .........................
KOBAROO1977 1 year ago
0:51 dx10 have got better grass ? i dont think so...
DrHoUSe9961 1 year ago
@DrHoUSe9961 go outside sometime and tell me if its not better...
dx9 has more grass but dx10 has better quality
alonalon777 9 months ago
dx 10 had better water and more bushes etc
fuge805 1 year ago
i fucked yur mum in them woods
YonOtto 1 year ago
you couldnt have she was cremated
ksvillani 10 months ago
@ksvillani I killed her after I raped her, so yes.
YonOtto 10 months ago
@dav3Merc And now its Win 7 turn for DirectX 11
mrcrazyenough007 1 year ago
@mrcrazyenough007
DX11 is not Win7 exclusive, so it's not...
firstemperor984 1 year ago
@firstemperor984 ya u r right cuz, windows 7 do not become a failure release for Microsoft as Vista was...
mrcrazyenough007 1 year ago
The only thing that is better in DX 10 is water i think. The grass look nicer on DX 9
hazzardous94 1 year ago
Do with me whatever you want, call me blind, but no matter how hard I tried to look, I didn't notice much of a difference. There IS a little difference here and there but honestly it's just barely noticeable. Actually I liked grass in DX9 more over DX0 tbh.
vincentwolf198055 1 year ago
the water is different on dx10 you can see the reflection and the shaders but dx9 is better because the game will be faster then the dx10 for standerd graphics card
bo7mod2009 1 year ago
DX10: everything is just brighter
DX9: Same as DX10 but a little bit more darker...
Just use the fucking brightness option instead of making a new DX and throw it to the public.
ElboTheHedgehog 1 year ago
no i thought the same thing
priestskorge 1 year ago
DX9 looks....better? Am I the only one that's noticed that?
ShitMovies2000 1 year ago
DX10 is more detailed...
My opinion...
ClassicDragRace 1 year ago
So just cus they turned on HDR, God Rays and made better textures, they're allowed to call it Dx 10? thats bullshit. All of those can be done on Dx9 Fuck Microsoft for not making Dx10 for XP.
yzbi 1 year ago
DX10 is better on shadows, but i like DX9 in this one
curlyclay2 1 year ago
waterfall in DX9 looks better, but the rest is poor, my opinion.
rockerlp 1 year ago 2
grass us worse, waterfall was better
AngryBF2Nerd 1 year ago
It's obvious that this game was a DX10 benchmark tool as well as Lost Planet. They just added extra foilage and fx. I'm sure DX9 could've handled the same thing, but they need to get people to buy the cards. It's cool, though. I recently got a GTX 470. No problems here.
Chronolyse 1 year ago
To me it just looks like directx10 is brighter and the grass seems to be longer in Directx9...
iamevildoing 1 year ago
The future if gaming will be brilliant.
gawdscapeplayer 1 year ago
DirectX 10 BEST DirectX of all time DirectX 11 is FAKE!!
marcin4645 1 year ago
how can it be fake? do you even own a dx11 capable card? trust me, as an owner of a hd5870 and being a gfx enthusiast for more years than i can care remember, my first 3d card was a 3d blaster(rendition chipset) way back in the day, and i've been through every dx version, starting with win 95. so i'm more than qualified to say your comment is a dumb thing to even think of posting, just how can it be fake?
huffdiggler 1 year ago
Comment removed
marcin4645 1 year ago
the odd thing is i like DX 9 more than 10 Oo... in my opinion it liiks better than 10..
Mastertim2006 1 year ago
the game's graphics is so good!
asafor6 1 year ago
а в этом тесте 9 лучше то однако
receptor1974 1 year ago
y do the mountains in dx10 look sooo much whiter?! grr
ilikewiigames 1 year ago
i prefer DX9 cause it seems way more polished with vivid colors.DX10 just "stains" the color giving a blurred resolution just adding some "effects" to the environment to give a "realistic" approach and better textures only on the environments that doesnt convince me M$.
Dragonfury3000 2 years ago
Dx10 has blurry shadows, realistic water, more terrain details, however vegetation blends with terrain.
Shayd93 2 years ago 4
???????????
BloodyRoar02 2 years ago
maybe its just me but I look the look of DX9 the DX10 just seems to look blurry spcialy the grass and waterfall
exocd 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow textures is alot better on dx10
jonabonA95 2 years ago
not much of an improvement there is it?
Vinn36legends 2 years ago 23
@Vinn36legends rock and grass looks better only
vuurwerkknaller 1 year ago
@Vinn36legends not much but the details are sharper clearler and glossier ..its still way bether then dx9
TheShufflingBoy 1 year ago
DX11 will kick major arses.....imagine DX10, but lighter and with a 1/5 larger filter libraries.....the new HDR and AA algorithms are just madness
Raonisk 2 years ago 3
I have yet to see a game that shows that DX10 is worth it. All I see is Microsoft showing the changes, and if you look at Crysis it is the same. Crysis looks nothing like it was suppose to do. All games released a "gameplay" video which is just CGI and a fake HUD.
myg0tpurepunk 2 years ago 3
Cryengine is just so toned down, so it could play on current hardware satisfactory. If you use custom config's, you can get the look it had in the gameplay videos.
Ylviste 2 years ago
far cry 2 seems the only one , better performance in dx10 with basically the same visuals
worldlone 2 years ago 2
Don't forget 3D geometry shaders!
Sheogorath2008 2 years ago
Comment removed
Ablequerq 2 years ago
lol directx 10 got updated with new textures, this is simply bullshit since the directx 9 version can also be modded to use them.
Robbaz 2 years ago 6
Yeah but it would require more afford from the side of the developer do do it, and won't have such shaders and lighting like in dx10.
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
dx10 is awesome
paolo3605 2 years ago 2
the light the water the shadow the mountain all of that was change in dx 10 and dx 10 makes the game cooler
arjay1133 2 years ago
Dx10 version has different textures all over the place, wth? Looks like they added spec and bump mapping to some objects as well, which can already be done in dx9 .Doesnt seem like a valid comparison ;/.
Anyways where can I download the dx9 benchmark? All I can seem to find is the dx10 benchmark to download.
Dorifto007 2 years ago
so DX10 amounts to higher resolution water, and different colouring?
alkafrazin 2 years ago
1:22 dx10 winer !!!
hasan4oto 2 years ago
lol i thought that dx9 looked better
kas90500 2 years ago 2
dx10 really sucks
yosefmashadani 2 years ago 2
omg DX10 is new version of DX so it must have some better shits
krystpan 2 years ago
direct x 10 wins like ever
tamtammr 2 years ago
0:26 the best of dx10 :D
abacalap 2 years ago
OK, I see a difference, but i can't say wich one looks better, i wouldn't say that 10 is better than 9, it's just different.
Scrabyard 2 years ago 2
It runs and ive got X600 Ati Radeon ahaha
EvrenB123 2 years ago
ok this goes to everyone who wants to know if you can run it:
Windows 2000/XP, 2.2 GHz Pentium 4/Athlon 2400+, 512 MB RAM, GeForce 6600/Radeon 9800, DirectX 9 sound card, 700 MB HDD
if you have all that, you can run it. to max it out, most likely get an ati card (the game is biased towards ati) or a later nvidia (8800GT and up) 2gb of ram and a dual-core. you should run it at very nice framerates.
or got to:
systemrequirementslab [dot] com
venom55520 2 years ago
venom those minimum requirements might be true but the game will not be playable with a 2400+ 6600 GT with 512 ram not even on low settings
banenwn 2 years ago
you can definitely run it on low at 800x600 with those settings...
venom55520 2 years ago
I've been looking at a lot of video's like this and I've realized that dx9 and dx10 ARE in fact significantly different, obviously, but it seems that what would normally be just skinned on dx9, look brilliantly textured in dx10.
mynamesDJ360 2 years ago
Better textures, better meshes, better lighting, better particle effects, better shader effects (especially for water)
This game probably doesn't take advantage of DX10 the way it should. Look at the Crysis DX9 vs DX10. Huge difference.
knuzcano2 2 years ago
Yes, you can.
LordKamyk 2 years ago
can I play this on max ( dx10) with my HD 4850?
aendre94 2 years ago
Most likely. but what is your processor speed and amount RAM?
thebizzlehimself 2 years ago
Intel E5200 ( 2x 2,5 Ghz)
4 Gb Kingmax DDRII 800 RAM
aendre94 2 years ago
Should be more than fine.
thebizzlehimself 2 years ago
I have a Ati HD 4850 and i have the same question.... please somebody answer! Thanks!
Th3Mast3rKimi 2 years ago
Whats this game about it looks cool!
dreampilot2 2 years ago
about cowboys
:D
best game ever!
DjMelstaitz 2 years ago
here you can actually see the difference the water is much better in the dx10
imagfgoober 2 years ago
I think it's cool that this game was one of the first games to be optimized for DX10.
Plus it's gameplay is awesome :)
trent1542 2 years ago
wather look good on dx 10 but the threes and grass is not so god
haiinromania 2 years ago 4
dude seriously this game got the best graphics on the trees than any other game out there
free4meh 2 years ago 3
You must never have heard of Crysis then.
dkamm65 2 years ago
the truth is that Call of Juarez got better graphics on the bark of the trees ( Adnvanced 3d textures) and the leaves is a lil bette here too. at least the leaves on the trees.
free4meh 2 years ago
Ok it may have higher res textures on trees but Crysis' trees have a more natural look and better physics applied to them when it comes to wind, Call of Juarez's lighting engine, or lack thereof, kind of ruins them whereas. And what good is higher res textures on trees when everything around them looks like crap?
dkamm65 2 years ago
well truth be told that the textures on ground is extremely detailed in Coj with dx10. Play the gmane and u will learn. they are sharper then crysis if you look close
free4meh 2 years ago
I'm working on a video that will completely prove you wrong, and then some.
dkamm65 2 years ago
Oops, take out the "whereas". lol
dkamm65 2 years ago
yep it looks good with the brightness turn up...sorry i don't know nothing
jetgeo4 2 years ago
you do "know nothing"
Dragon9507 2 years ago
You can really see when it gets in the grass at :52 that DX10 is more refined graphics using better shaders.
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago
Better textures, lighting, shadows and water detail in direct x 10, although it is quite hard to spot some of these differences in these low quality youtube videos. Call of Juarez is a great game whatever settings you have it on!!
KIERANS1993 3 years ago
people just dont get it. just because a game uses dx10 doesn't mean it will have awsome quality, the game isn't usually directly written in dx or opgl it is written using a game engine like Gamebryo or Dark Engine it depends on the engine. dx just makes more features available to developers, its not a magic wand that instantly boosts quality like, maybe anti-aliaing. Its not like Thief: The Dark Project (1998, 3D RPG) would suddenly look like Crysis if it was converted or hacked to run in dx10.
liamsp544 3 years ago
actually i'm a programmer and most games today are written in C++ and Open Gl.
Bodraw333 3 years ago 4
What about C sharp thats a pretty good programming language, and its much easier thatn C++ in my opinion
WeMustPushLittleCart 2 years ago
dx10 is suck.This directx is eating many hardware resources and in most games difference between DX9 and DX10 is "little".
In call of juarez the diffence is huge but overall DX9 is better to use in comparison with DX10, because DX10 is DX9.0C with better effects and need a very good PC to run it smooth.
saibarcafi 3 years ago
DX10 gives better physics and makes every game that supports it... look smoother. I likes it
NuBcoke 3 years ago
The waterfall looks better in DX9, which is odd.
ChernobylTaco 3 years ago 2
no it doesn't. Water in dx9 just doesnn't look real. The splashes from the waterful in the dx10 is much more realistic. Better splashes
DN94 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have this game and its stink
caspice 3 years ago
great graphics.i want to ask you one question,where did you find directx10.i've benn looking for it but i can't find it,please help me
tcvjetk4 3 years ago
It comes with Vista.
bicostp 3 years ago
i think you should get your eyes checked out because your BLIND!!!
primusman117 3 years ago
i think this is the only game that the diference between the dx's is seen without geting your eyes out.Good job ubisoft.
dumtru 3 years ago
dx10 is smoother,more detailed and more realistic than dx9
grovest26 3 years ago
OoCraftoO have right directX10 is just brighter!
Noahwig 3 years ago
can someone help me out..?
I have Call of Juarez on my XP in DX 9. It runs fine.
I installed vista Ultimate (64 bit) on my other HD and then installed Call Of Juarez.
Im not able to start the game!?
Specs:
GPU: ATI R4850
CPU: AMD Phenom @ 2.3 GHz
RAM: 4 GB OCZ Reaper 800 MHz DDRII
HD: Samsung Spinpoint F1 (Windows Vista Ultimate)
DjMelstaitz 3 years ago
OMGFG Give me your computer :F
Mrozek93 3 years ago
Have you installed SP1 for vista already? solved any issues i still had with running games.
tz496 3 years ago
yes i installed it
DjMelstaitz 3 years ago
Just Check if Call of juarez is supported in 64 bits system only a few games are supported good luck
jpr3ddraon 3 years ago
dx9 looks better to me :s
ownagenewb111 3 years ago
Yep me too:D
TraXx1992 3 years ago
Of course DX10 is better than DX9; the quetion we have to ask ourselves is: Is DX10 reason enough to make us want to switch from xp to vista?
rampagerampage 3 years ago 4
I think (had I had a nice PC, I just got through cleaning viruses off this one.) I'd rater take DX 9 better texture work.
rocka156 3 years ago
I think DX9 is a little bit better. Anyway I'm gonna try DX10 sometime)
87055446137 3 years ago
u are stupid.dx10 is of course better
kloakenskansen 3 years ago
wow, look both ar about tthe same, lighting in dx 10 is better, but the textures in dx9 are better.. so comparing both they are the same.
ajkid93 3 years ago
is almost the same just a bit smoother i dont really understand dx10 although i have vista and use it
it whould be better if i check the differences by myself i guess
youngtboys 3 years ago
STRANGE! X10 ... looks better just in the water
renzohawk2 3 years ago
In this vid DX10 looks way better ...but DX9 renders more grass...why is this ??!
theoneandonlyjohnkan 3 years ago
no it didnt render more grass...they have the same amount just that you cant tell in DX10 because its alot smother unlike DX9 which is sharper
23742 3 years ago
DirectX 11 :D
gameswindows 3 years ago
What is the biggest failure of DX10?That is DX11 doesn't support winxp.I have to install fucking vista to enjoy DX10.Fuck microsoft!!!
godjing1985 3 years ago
Anyone knows if it's possible to run this benchmark on my xp system? Where can I download it from?
SUGKUG 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What an ugly game.
DaveyJones1111 3 years ago
You're ugly...
SUGKUG 3 years ago
Well, compared to other fps's out there, it isn't exactly top of the line. But I guess, being the only DX10 fps that has a western theme, it earns its place.
DaveyJones1111 3 years ago
no its not bullshit, its the future, in 2 years or so it will have as much sucess as DX9.
But in some games there isnt much difference.
GeForce47 3 years ago 4
dx10 is nicer in terms of effects, but i guess it only changes things people wouldn't notice otherwise while playing.
jayrq2o1 3 years ago
blind ppl can't tell the difference :)
backtublive 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GEARS OF WAR OWN.
Filipe505050 3 years ago
i honestly have to say that DX 9 looks better =*(
coldles 3 years ago
dx9 looks better.
k80sg 3 years ago
That it HDR??
You get that in DX 9 ne way.
DX 10 is a total waste. Shud be DX 9.1
slaterking1000 3 years ago
where did the grass disappear from dx10? CHEATEEER!
Zewerii 3 years ago
add &fmt=18 to this video for a much higher quality which provides a more clear presentation of dx version. btw, &fmt=6 doesnt work in this vid even though it wouldve been better (since this vid has no audio and 6 gives better video but worse audio than 18. the thing about this video though is that u dont see two scenes side-by-side at the same time to really scrutinize and analyze. two seperate benchies put in split screen rather than the same bench in split-screen would give better results =]
unrealistic1 3 years ago 2
nagg dx 10 won this one
hellobooom 3 years ago
dx9 had "more detail" visually, to me
and dx10 had better effects...
overall dx9 won
unless you fucked up the configuration
you dont have to downgrade the dx10 render, take it frame by frame with a proper recording app
fwsGonzo 3 years ago 3
Dx 9 felt better than dx 10: Honest !
UnknownSystemCrasher 3 years ago
i hate when youtube lowers the quality of the videos that show graphics quality between dx9 and dx10... they are some good ones but bad ones as well
Desimor 3 years ago
dx9 win
iwams1 3 years ago 3
you have to see well the mountains textures...
jcast18k 3 years ago
This doesn't look right... The texture and HDR effects in DX9 have been deliberately lowered.
Seedr0 3 years ago
can you play the game in dx10?? or just benchmark??
k3rbst0mp 3 years ago
I have played both GUN & COJ and i can say that GUN is more open it's like a western GTA. This is the thing that lacked in COJ, there are a lot of open spaces but it's dead no side quests or messing around, just a strait story with boundaries. But in COJ the story line is way more interesting, & the graphics are just wonderful! I loved both games but frankly saying, im waiting for a COJ with an open world or GUN with kicking graphics.
mjshikeli 3 years ago
i'm waiting for your mother
sonnycounter2 3 years ago 2
DX9 looks so much better in this. DX10 shows this retarded grass where DX9 has proper grass. Just the sun looks better.
kragapie 3 years ago
Soft particle bug probably. Still DX 10 has alot of realism improvements.
xur8761 3 years ago
For sure i mean DX10 is the new generation ofc its got improvements, but as you see now everything seems to be.
kragapie 3 years ago
The water looks better, textures are higher quality and have more lighting effecting properties, better lighting, soft(-er) particles, longer drawdistance and the possibility to render more at the time.
Still need more?
Dragory 3 years ago 3
I have a DX10 pc fucktart. I know what its like. Maybe you should just fucking try reading next time. I said in this game it looks shit. Alright. Get it? Want me to say it again?
kragapie 3 years ago
I have played this game on my Dx10 PC, I don't know where you're digging that "it looks bad" shit.
Dragory 3 years ago
looks bad in this clip compared to 9.
kragapie 3 years ago
Only the grass.
And that doesn't look ugly when really playing... at least for me.
Whatever, case closed.
Dragory 3 years ago
is this game fun, i dont hear much about it so im guessing no
laidt0rest 3 years ago
its fun if you have the hardware and your hardcore gamer
xur8761 3 years ago
i do have the hardware and i am a hardcore gamer :D, i guess ill give it a try
laidt0rest 3 years ago
What a bad comparison! its not paralel on each sides!
MouthofSaurons 3 years ago
well actually i cant see a much of the difference,i had dx9 with xp but right now i own vista and with dirextx10,but if i play something on both windows(i have 2 computers,one with xp and other with vista)i dont see any difference.
thisisntyouomfg 3 years ago
its says DX9 DX10 at the bottom...
DeatStar96 3 years ago
dude how come at 0:26 the water effect on the rightside looks cooler i thought that was suppose to be DX9.
azuzaj1 3 years ago
It might look cooler, but it isn't realistic at all. lol. You know that waterfalls in real life don't look like that.
sublime95 3 years ago
nice comparison,on dx10 water looks cooler,but less grass on dx10,maybe cause juares is one of the oldies...xD
ICECROATIAN 3 years ago
thanks for the upload, dont bother with comments from idiots, lol
willysos 3 years ago
What a useless comparison.
idiotspadeklaptorsk 3 years ago
can sum 1 give me the link to dx10
sharp93 3 years ago
u have to have vista
yopolopogus 3 years ago
i do
sharp93 3 years ago
then it should be on the internet just google it
yopolopogus 3 years ago
can u give me a link casue the only direct x i found was a hacked one for XP
sharp93 3 years ago
well it would probably be on a game disk aswell just like dx 9
yopolopogus 3 years ago
what games have DX10 on disk
sharp93 3 years ago
crysis and probably call of juarez
yopolopogus 3 years ago
o.well im too broke right now to afford a pc game but is there a link u can send me
sharp93 3 years ago
i dont no dude all i no is you can get it on a disk jst google dx 10 vista download
yopolopogus 3 years ago
k thanks
sharp93 3 years ago
These tests are bullshit try watching videos of dx9 vs 10 that aren't released by the creators you will see a difference but not like this.
acidheadx 3 years ago
You ever play CoJ? Looks right to me.
Cypher0236 3 years ago