Lagrange Multipliers - Two Constraints

[anakmudajaman]

I Love The Video I show how to find the maximum and minimum value of a function subject to TWO constraints using Lagrange Multipliers It Can Increase My Knowledge

[AntoMelta]

Good, I like that you share this video I show how to find the maximum and minimum value of a function subject to TWO constraints using Lagrange Multipliers., I wish success always

[willamricard]

Nice Video Lagrange Multipliers Two Constraints That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[imegatrone]

I Really Like The Video Lagrange Multipliers Two Constraints From Your

[bundawartini]

Your Video Lagrange Multipliers Two Constraints Is Very Useful Sharing

[MultiConebone69]

This video is awesome, but what if I had a function g(x,y) : x+y=c, where c>0. I just don't know how to solve for something if all I am given is a constant. They give an f(x,y) function clearly, but I just don't know how to deal with the constant.

Thanks!

[LAnonHubbard]

This is great but very tough on the learning to be suddenly swapped to an advertisment in the eighth minute :(

[patrickJMT]

@LAnonHubbard thanks for letting me know, it is gone now.

[Xero555000]

LEFTY!

[fcdog555]

Sal and Pat should have a math off

sal from Khanacad btw

both have saved me in calc:)

[tadm123]

@fcdog555 same here both of these guys are amazing

[locomotive147]

Please do a Kuhn-Tucker video... that thing is killing me :x

[YEUHNBD]

What grade do you learn this in? Or is this university?

[paparaka]

Great video thanks a lot.

[joshuaj92]

Does anyone know why he rationalized at the end? Seems easier to deal with the addition while they all have the same denominator.

[GuyBluesummers]

Thank you for helping break this down into something manageable. It's exactly what I was looking for!

[patchesohola]

u should try n get a sponsorship by like a marker company or something

[Mayitzin]

@patchesohola Just don't put videos at the beginning. Youtube already does that.

[andronicusyyz]

Good job. I have a question though. In your introductory example of Lagrangian method with 2 variables and 1 constraint, you were plugging in the numbers into the 1st degree partial of the lamda. However, in this video, you plugged in the numbers directly into the two constraints, instead of the first degree partials of lamda and mu respectively. Is there any specific reason for that?

Thanks in advance.

[broozbehani]

Super job!

[broozbehani]

Very good, a little weak on the min/max proof. You should proof whether the second derivative, in this case partial derivative is positive, to prove it is a minimum. Great jib anyway!

[BazteK7]

@broozbehani Dude he taught that in a previous vid, he doesn't have time to reteach everything again and again lol. That was vid one of this topic, so get with it...

[alroge]

ty man...ure a godsend compared to my college profs...

[NinjaXSong]

WOW Nice. 10/5. I just obtained a new weapon in my math arsenal for competitions.

[patrickJMT]

@NinjaXSong MATHLETE!

[xXxDoctaRxXx]

Thanks for this video, you don't know how much this helps=)

[Syruscleat]

Very tedious, but interesting. Thanks for taking the time to show us Math Junkies the procedure. Lambda was a gimme as is this video. On my way to watch part II. Danke.

[shogundapker]

Thanks for the upload! :D!