Added: 4 years ago
From: TheGrammarian
Views: 7,319
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (250)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Also, if you don't want a stigma change the name of your so called "Equal Rights Movement". Why not "Equal Rights Advocates" instead of "Feminists"? The word Feminist or Feminism implies gynocentricity.

  • what a brilliant essay! i had to send it to my sister after seeing it. when i mentioned to her that i was a feminist, she rolled her eyes and brushed it off as a college fad. little does she realize that by brushing off the ideals of feminism, she is simply oppressing herself. thank you so much for putting these concepts into fine words :) you are a marvelous woman with great things to say!

  • Your inability to present a single coherent fallacy-free argument is taxing

    Were done here.

    Lets analyze this comment, the first part uses a higher degree of vocabulary, good job i can use big words too but don't because generally people who do that are trying very hard to appear more intelligent than they are

    The second line is attempting to establish your dominance, and make it seem like you have control of the concersation. You dont, you can block me, but I still made valid points.

  • Feminism is Communism

  • I presented one, you just don't want to talk about it because your a feminist and it goes against your cause. Take off your blinders and wake up, we're pretty damn equal. Also my second point was valid too, we can do things you can't, you can do things we cant. WE ARE NOT EQUAL, suck it up already and stop annoying the hell out of people with common sense.

  • "Your making assumptions based on my gender" How about we stop watching Friends and learn what humor and satire is? Oh yeh, feminists don't feel emotion.

  • men and women arn't equal, if they were we'd ude the same public restrooms, women would walk around without a shirt on the beach, women would have huge biceps. no matter what you think we are not, nor will we ever be equal. And in my state they require a certain amount of girls for certain spots, I know what affirmative action is thank you for repeating it over and over, I'm not talking about that. I mentioned it because that too is unequal, I'm talking about chicks.

  • Your inability to present a single coherent fallacy-free argument is taxing.

    We're done here.

  • did you skip the part where they reserve slots for females only? I know your a girl, but I still though you could read. Almost every government job requires a certain amount of females, if theres 5 required and only 4 filled then a man from

    Yale with 6 years experiance is competing for that slot against a women who graduated from some no name college and has no experiance, the women gets the slot. But you guys don't care about inequality unless it's against women, hypocrites all of you...

  • You are conflating feminism with affirmative action, and committing a logical fallacy in doing so.

    You are also making assumptions about my intelligence because of my gender, which clearly showcases how "equal" you think men and women are.

  • "logical fallacy"??? I hope you didn't take a long time to think of that inappropriate use of words. The way you talk makes me think you are not attracted to men and have little respect for them. Otherwise, what do they have that you do not? You must think it's just so damned easy being a man. I would like to get a feminist like you a sex-change operation and you can see for yourself how damned easy it is.

  • Feminists are idiots, all bullshit and it pisses me off. I wanted a job, a very comptative job slot, there were 30 spots open. Thanks to unequal sexist laws 5 of those spots at least have to be female. So now theres 25. And thanks to racist laws five spots have to be afrian american, five have to be hispanic. So I'm Wondering....hmm, where are the laws to ensure a white male like myself is guarenteed a slot....oh wait only women and non whites are guarenteed a spot. Stop bitching already

  • Feminism = Affirmative Action

    Here is your fallacy, love.

  • He's not saying that Feminism = Affirmative Action. He's saying that if Feminists really wanted equality between men and women they would be against it.

    Are you against affirmative action? If not than you do not believe in equality. Affirmative Action activeley discriminates against a group. Does

    Discrimination = Equality ???

    No, so you say that Feminism = Equality, but it doesn't until every feminist denounces Affirmative Action and all other laws that discriminate against anyone.

  • Nice vid.

    Being a guy, calling myself a feminist when I was younger was so far off the scale that I found it fun. People didn't know how to respond. The 'you just hate men' response wan't really aplicable. Now I'm at university and all my friends, male and female, have no hesitation calling themselves feminists. So I never really had the 'coming out' difficulty. I still get upset about feminist steriotypes though, and its depressing how many lies are told about what important feminists have said

  • I'd say 90% of female feminists are man haters, self proclaimed male feminists are usually looking to fit in with a group or give their lives a sense of meaning. Me I believe everyone should be equal, feminism implies women are above other, and don't even try to argue a good percentage of feminists do think women are better. Now wheres that pie?

  • Well, it's a good thing that anecdotal evidence is bullshit, and it doesn't matter what you think. No point in arguing.

    If you believed men and women are equal, you'd have no problem making your own damned pie. How do you like them apples?

  • Sorry it took me so long to respond; I tend to avoid these comments because they're so full of hate.

    I completely agree with you.

  • I'm 19, and as a girl, i'm really glad to hear about feminism. My mom reminds me all the time what she went through at work, and how it used to be far worse than it now. Yet my mom also tells me there is such a very long way to go. I look forward to seeing more videos from you!

  • =)

    __

  • lol at Feminist

  • lol at Canada. ;)

  • women are stupid they complian about how men are dogs and just wont sex then they have it.

  • 2) You know, the kind of kids with virtually no real knowledge just their own preconceived notions of reality that are far from actual reality. So they focus on small details like you're opposed to your as their only weapon to hate. Which your initial response proved. You are here to hate. The women who struggled for equal rights did not stand on the streets hating. They intelligently made men understand their perspective, not focusing on unimportant details.

    You are a sexist not a feminist.

  • Thank you for your thoughts.

  • A 22 year old female doesnt really understand any struggle women had in the past. Women teach mainly because they are the primary care givers in the houshold, while men traditionally work for money and maintain the household property. Men and women are not equal either. Each has their strong points that should be emphasized. You seem angry that you arnt given all the benefits of both sexes not being happy with your own strengths. You're writing is bland and needs work.

  • Women and men are inherently equal -- they are both human. Yes, men are strong, but there are some pretty strong women out there as well. Yes, women can be very nurturing when providing care is absolutely necessary; I believe men can be as nurturing and caring as any woman, given the same situation.

  • Oh, and my age doesn't really have much to do with what I can or can't understand. As you said in your first comment, I am independent and intelligent (because men have allowed me to be, remember?). Your ageist argument is old and weak.

    Lastly, the irony in "you're" last sentence is absolutely hilarious!

  • Only an ignorant child could claim they are capable of understanding whatever think they can. It's many times different to actually experience it than read about it. Only a true fool would think otherwise. Also if you had any real knowledge about anything other than your hate group you would have done a little research about how the male and female brains operate differently. Their are several factual points that are not the same.

  • You should spend more time reading books, than on here talking like you know somthing. I'm sure as a 22 year old girl can actually grasp the pain and suffering people had to endure before you were even born. Why don't you try telling the Jews that are still alive from WW2 that you can feel their pain as if you were there with them in those days. Watch them laugh, and then spit on you for such a ridiculous statment. Lastly im please you're pathetic enough to find my grammerical error funny

  • Right, I should read more books because reading them will somehow make me understand something that someone my age can't quite possibly understand... You see the fallacy in your logic there?

    Ha! I'm please that you're pathetic enough to make the grammatical error in the first place!

  • You prove to me time and again how dumb you are. Your life seems very cyclic in that sense. Failure after failure in all its forms. You proved me correct by you avoiding the topic. Their is also a difference between knowledge that is gained by experience like living through hard times and studying the central nervous system, or maybe astronomy.

    I made the initial error purposely, because I had a feeling someone with your name on here would focus and laugh like 12 year olds do in chat rooms

  • Have a wonderful life, Night9989. You really are such an endearing person. I'm glad we've met.

    Thank you for your thoughts.

  • Passive aggressive, the last resort of the weak. I came in here knowing you couldnt give me an intelligent explaination of your stance. I was hoping you could though. Have a nice life, sitting in your house talking on here thinking people respect anything you have to say while you get even fatter. I wont post here anymore, or even read your responses. And yes, the fat thing was rude. It is the only thing I typed just for the sake of being rude.

  • =) Thanks.

  • "my age doesn't really have much to do with what I can or can't understand"

    and 20 years from now, you'll realize that at YOUR present AGE, you still don't know squat.

  • While it is true that my knowledge base may increase or decrease with age, my ability to attain and process information does not.

  • this is a very good piece of work, and whilst i don't necessarily agree with every comment you made here, i do think that you presented this in a fascinating and compelling manner.

  • Well, thank you. =)

  • this is a very good piece of work, and whilst i don't necessarily agree with every comment you made here, i do think that you presented this in a fascinating and compelling manner.

  • Before I leave though, your worries about how women are portrayed in the media are unfounded. All I see when I watch primetime, movies, commercials, is the idiotic way women are "over-portrayed" (If I can get away with that word). Seriously, a 105 lb. woman beatin the crap outta 200 lb. men?! On what frickin planet? Or my favorite: the clumsy, retarded husband and his perfect wife on...oh...every damn show! Or how about, every guy is afraid of his wife? I love that one. Seriously...*groan*

  • Guys, don't you see? All she wants is an arguement. Not to work things out, come to an agreement, make the world spin on a friendlier axis, but simply.....to fight others opinions. Anyone this hard headed will NOT bend, agree, absorb, or even pretend to muttle over any given facts or debate. She speaks with an air of superiority, rants about "imagined" unequal rights, an attacks anyone who posts even a fragment of thought that does not perfectly mirror hers. Let's just leave her to her misery..

  • Booooring....

  • apparently i'm a feminist. thanks. no joke either.

  • haha. Glad to be of use.

  • You draw conclusions based upon half truths and enormous generalizations. The basis of almost every aspect of what it is that you espouse is endlessly debateable at times and is ouright incorrect others.. This is the the type of rhetoric that feminists feed off of; its an us-against-them mentality that only succeeds in further solidifying the stigmas and stereotypes associated with your group.

  • I think you're letting your pre-existing biases against feminists cloud your judgment.

  • thanks for the regurgitation.

  • Ah, but it was directed at you. I think you are the proverbial "pot calling the kettle black."

  • But, you see, this statement was never directed toward you in the first place. I wasn't asking for your ignorant opinion. I assure you that Grammarian is perfectly capable of defending her own ideas if she so chooses. These are her ideals. I dont need your interpretations of what she may be thinking. You're simply looking for an meaningless confrontation. Piss off.

  • No, I think it was you who was looking for the "meaningless confrontation." This is apparent by your abbrasive tone. I assure you that HanifXHier is more than welcome to comment where ever he so pleases regardless of who is attacking my ideas.

  • Perhaps you should listen more carefully. I assume this is what HanifXHier was saying. The assignment was to make generalizations based on a small group of individuals. I very clearly stated this. Your pre-existing biases against feminists may have prevented you from understanding that this was one assignment, one class, one experience. It's my story, not a statement about men and women, not a statement about society, noting tested, no real statistics. It was just a story -- an expository essay.

  • Furthermore, even if this essay gave you the "us against them" tone, which I doubt it did, since it was an appeal to those who don't call themselves feminists by sharing a possibly common experience, it would have nothing to do with furthing the stigma against feminists. No where did I "burn my bra," try to castrate or emasculate men, or anything that is typically associated with feminism. If the stigma you're citing is that of an articulate and aggressive femle, however, you've got me pinned.

  • So when you say f@#k God. You are acknowledging that he does exist.

  • Yeah, when I was fifteen.

  • Hm, or perhaps, Ikiuyrtfglo, TheGrammarian was referring to the human construct "God," which is an idea, in the same way that someone might say "fuck femininity" or "screw postmodernism." The idea of god is a concept in our society, regardless of whether god exists.

  • Thank you, jadewolf. =)

  • The whining.. The Endless whining..

  • The whining comments... The endless whining comments..

  • Have you considered the possibility that the reason that none of your classmates said anything about your presentation is because your conclusions were so ridiculous that they were literally beyond rational commentary? Also, don't you realize how stupid the assignment you were given is? You cannot draw meaningful generalizations about humanity based on a few examples like you were asked to do. I feel bad for you as it sounds like you were on the receiving end of a poor education - and it shows.

  • Oh my fucking god, dude. That really hurt. I think I'll go slit my wrists (the wrong way since I'm so poorly educated) and then sue my college for the shitty education I received.

    Thanks for the comment!

  • OK, but why do a half-ass job? If you're going to do something, do it right! When it comes to slitting your wrists just remember: "it's down the street, not across the tracks." Now you can't say that I've never done anything for you.

    You're welcome.

  • What a wonderful idea! I might steal it. :)

  • ... which idea? Telling your "coming out" story?

  • yes

  • Sweet! Post as a reply! =)

  • Gender roles weren't created by men or the "patriarchy" it's created by nature.

    There are things that men are superior by nature (more than you think), and the same goes for women.

    And guys, it's pointless to change anybody's mind here, the same discussions will go on again and again.

    I've got fed up with it, I came back here because somebody replied to me: SuperPais, I know about the "ignore when somebody makes a point" thing. :)

  • "All societies, to a certain effect, have a gender/sex system, although the components and workings of this system vary markedly from society to society," Wikipedia article "Gender Roles."

    If gender roles were simply part of nature, there wouldn't be vast differences between societies. I think you're confusing biological differences with gender roles. Maybe look them up.

  • he was being sarcastic stupid and YOU HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS seriously what oyu want is wemon to be superior to men its like backwards sexist cmon before log we're gonna need the male equivalent of femenist (malenist?) they are equal already. and what do you want su to do change sitcoms to make them more female loving thats censorship and i wont stand for it.

  • Actually, I don't think "wemon" should be superior to men (or "wee-man" if that's what you were going for). Nice try putting words in my mouth, though. Also, there is already a movement for men's rights. It's called masculinism (but "malenist" was totally cute).

  • Noone should tell me how I should or should not act? Cool, no laws. Allright. Or do you mean to say that when my parent's told me NOT to act the way I felt I was being oppressed? When I WANTED to be rough and tumble, but my parents told me I should play with dolls I was being oppressed? So, should we tell little girls that they are just as strong as boys and THEY should be NAVY SEALS and Army Rangers? What do we tell them when they will fail?

  • People fail; it's part of life. There would be no success without failure. Assuming that women are completely inept and can only amount to failure is wrong. Yes, on the whole men are physically stronger than women. A woman would have to work a lot harder to match the strength of a man, but this is not to say that it is impossible.

    Notice your language: not "if" women fail-"when."

  • I didn't assume women are completely inept. There are some things that they will fail at. Should we alter things so that that never happens? If they fail, why gender norm? Ehat if this puts peoples lives at risk? Should it be done so we don't "offend" anyone? So noone feels "inferior"? So noone has thier feelings hurt?

  • "There are some things that they will fail at. Should we alter things so that that never happens?"

    No, and telling women they can't or shouldn't do things they might fail at is doing just that -- fixing it so that they won't fail. Failure happens. Deal with it. Infringing on someone's rights isn't justified by preventing this failure; that's absurd.

  • I understand that failure happens. It seems to be the feinist movement that WON'T let women fail. They won't let women have limitations and not be able to do things. If they can't make it through the physical part of the fireman's test, well, just ater it so that she will. That way she doesn't fail and we get to say that we're equal. Happens in Fire departments, police departments, the military. It really is a disservice to women.

  • Please see my video on Affirmative Action and my soon to be posted Benevolent Sexism video.

  • When is the one on Benevolent Sexism coming out? I'd like to see it.

  • Soon. I asked for everyone's opinion on the matter, collected lots of text from various YT users, and I've just to compile it all into one vid now.

    Go check out the video responses. They were very interesting.

  • What right is being infringed upon exactly? I am unclear. If I am physically unable to do a job that is limited by my gender or ability, then my rights are being infringed? HUH? If I say children shouldn't work construction because they're not strong enough, thier rights are being infringed? Or should we still let them try and fail at great expense of time and money, and still end up with no no difference?

  • I didn't get angry with you for agreeing at all. I am in utter disbelief that someone can believe that they are oppressed in a country like this.

    OK. Good reason to have a beef. But what's destructive? Movies where some 5-2' female is kicking some 6-4' Marine's ass? I agree, dangerous and unrealistic. Why shouldn't there be gender roles? Are there no differences between men and women? Differences in aptitudes, etc?

    Please don't assume what I have and have not read.

  • I didn't assume anything. You proved you were either unaware or misinformed of the goals and aims of Third Wave Feminism when you brought up politics (voting, freedom of speech, etc).

  • When I bring up politics, (i.e. voting, etc.), it is to show that since you have those rights, and none are denied, that any arguments about oppression are merely academic. Fine.

    Now, what should we tell boys and gorls and women and men? That they are NOT liited by thing such as strength and abilities? We should LIE to them or lie to everyone by forcing equality? Do you want equality or sameness? They are 2 different things entirely.

  • Gender roles are oppressive by definition. No one has the right to tell someone else how they should or should not act. Gender roles and patriarchal propaganda are so submersed within our media that we hardly even see that they are there.

  • Give me an example of "patriarchal propaganda" that is submerged within our media, please. Is it things like every TV show having stupid, incompetent and bumbling male characters whose wives and children are smarter than them? Or all the movies where women can outrun, outfight, outlast, outhink, and outsmart EVERY man? Where are women allowed to be human with limitations?

  • Maybe the messages are so subbtle that we barely notice because they're not there? It reminds me of people looking for ANY reason to claim to be wronged, no matter how small. People must spend hours, days looking for ANY sign of gender bias.

  • Days? No. Hours? Not quite.

    Watch any average family sitcom. Women are never shown at work, always at home. Men rarely are shown changing diapers or cleaning anything. Watch what the women and men eat. Women eat salads and very light meals. Men eat meat and dessert.

  • I flipped on the TV and went throough the channels and saw Grace (From Will and Grace) in her shop, Christine from New adventures of Old Christine at her job, Monica was working as a cook, Rachel was at the office doing fashion design, The Female Doctors on ER were in the hospital, as was the girl from SCRUBS, and this was just in 3 minutes. I have a much longer list.

  • Shall I go through and give you the list of what they were eating and how many diapers they changed? BTW, none of the single odern women in any of those shows changed diapers or know how to either.

  • No, the numbers of each diaper and salad will not be necessary. This debate has now been reduced to your opinion verses mine, and I'm not up for doing the research for you.

    Thanks for commenting.

  • It's not about opinion. You said that TV Shows (sitcoms in particular) never show women at work, and I told you they do. I can send you some clips from youtube showing the exact same things if you want. (Facts are inconvenient, I know). I did the research for you, and you don't seem to like the results.

  • ... and I could show you clips of women eating salads and men eating steak... but like I said, it's not necessary. Neither of us are able to go through all sitcoms and take a tally, so let's just drop it. Or, if it's uber-important to you, I'll just say you win. K?

  • Women in this country are SO OPPRESSED. They can't vote, have no freedom of speech, can't drive, can't have jobs, have no legal rights, thier lot in life is WORSE by FAR than in, say, Saudi Arabia.  There is NO equality at all in this country. You sound SOOOO OPPRESSED. I don't even know HOW you were even able to post this on youtube.

  • You're right. Sexism knows no boundaries and neither does Feminism. I'm sorry you feel so hostile. I pity you.

  • How about instead of "pitying" me answering when where and how exactly women are oppressed? Or is questioning the feminist orthodoxy oppression? Curious as to what rights and such are denied and what foorm oppression takes?  BTW, sarcasm isn't hostility. If you can't answer an argument, then why hold your beliefs?

  • Arguments don't require answers; they require rebuttals. Your sarcasm definitely muckied up your argument, but I thought it was that women are not oppressed as much here as in other countries, and to this, I responded. What more do you want from me?

  • You answer and argument with a rebuttal. That's just it, you didn't rebut. You just agreed that sexism knows no boundaries. I am positing that there is so little oppression here as to be negligible. I am curious as to when, where and how it exists? Women are outstripping men in education, especially higher education, thier salaries are on par with men's in many cases, we have women senators, congress people, judges, police chief's, CEO's, etc. Where's the inequality?

  • You're right. I agreed with you, and you got angry with me for agreeing. Maybe you should present arguments free of sarcasm and hostility so that it can be properly received.

    My biggest beef is gender roles as portrayed by our media. How women and men, boys and girls should act. It's destructive.

    If you are genuinely interested, I suggest you check out some information about first, second, and third wave feminism, but I suspect you're just looking for a fight rather than information.

  • listen up real hard. ther is no possible way you can shift the media its in our 1st amendmentthsi video is useless the media is uneffected by law so there is no way anything is gonna change.

  • I'm listening "real hard." Really, I am... Oh wait, no I'm not. Because that doesn't make sense.

    You're right. Nothing will change with an attitude like yours.

  • you need to realize that you cant change what the media thinks its imposible the more you try the more people are gonna rebel. btw we are equal in fact you have more rights then we do so stop complaining.

  • I think if you read all of your remarks on this comment board, you'd realize that you've done way more of the "complaining" than I have.

    BTW, your "us" and "them" mentality really isn't flattering.

  • Ever notice when Bougie, Feminist, Liberal White Women get together to discuss the need for diversity you see Bougie, Feminist, Liberal White Women. There is more diversity at Augusta National Golf Club.

    How come feminists prostituted themselves out to a rapist like Bill Clinton. (Keep in mind Juanita Broderick is reliable, because no women ever lies about rape)

  • I really liked this story/essay.

  • Yay! You came! Welcome! ;)

    I'm glad you like it.

  • Your agenda is old and outdated. Bitches have it as good as anyone in this day and age. Maybe if you all would lose some weight and fix yourselves up a bit, you'd get more out of life. You all look the same. Lose the mullet, its 2007 for crying out loud.

  • Wow.

  • Jboxton

    You just proved Feminist claims of repression so you know.

  • So you are admitting you have a mullet?

  • So are you admitting to be a moron? Oh wait, I guess you already implied it with your first response. Nevermind.

  • Yes I am a moron....now come clean (in a lawyer's voice) DO you or do you NOT have A MULLET!!!

  • Since we're being truthful... I can honestly say I do *not* have a mullet. I'm sorry to disappoint you, dear one.

  • OK it's either one or the other. Mullet or you weigh more than 200lbs. Guess you fall in the latter.

  • Nice try, but no.

    Ok, it's either one or the other. You're fourteen or you're a virgin. Or both... Wait, nevermind on that one or the other shit.

  • 200lbs is a figure of speech but you ARE fat. That's a given. You bitches need to learn you are good for 4 things:

    1..cook

    2..clean

    3..to hit

    4..to procreate

    That's all your good for. Have a good holiday and cook something! :)

  • Oh so you are a virgin! I knew it. If you wanted to hide that next time, you may want to shy away from the offensive attack immediate after you're questioned. Just a thought.

    Have a good holiday and learn something, young one.

  • Our agenda is a response to an old and outdated way of thinking (try thousands of years). Maybe If you lost your pathetic vocabulary, lousy rhetoric, lack of sentient thought, fucked up sense of self-worth, and flaming ignorance, you'd get more out of life. Lose the mysogonist attitude, its 2007 for crying out loud.

  • Nicely put.

  • But no one thinks the way you perceive any more. Men and women are treated equal...the ones who don't see that are the women who are attracted to other women. There's nothing wrong with that, but don't let your guilt in that fact cloud your vision. Oh...and most of you mullets.

  • Wow.

    "... most of you mullets."

  • Really? "Women and men are treated equal"? Well that may be the general attitude (trend?) in MOST of the united states and some other countries, this is not so in every corner of the world. What of the Fundamentalist LDS women, who are treated like slaves to thier husbands? What of the women in the middle east?

  • Who care about them...they are all savages anyway. That's like saying in the wild the female lions are not treated fairly by the male lions. I am talking about civilized human beings not animals.

  • You're aware of the fact that you JUST proved what feminists are trying to point out, right?

    For the record, though I kinda don't see how it matters, I don't have a mullet OR weigh a lot. I'm still a feminist. There are genuine inequalities in society between the genders, with women generally getting the worst of it. The fact that you are so defensive implies that you are insecure about yourself and your position.

  • I really don't see feminists going to the middle east to preach there. Oh and for the record, there are plenty of topics on muslim women, aparently they cover themselves up beacause they want to, that's their religion, good luck changing Islam :)

  • You wouldn't see feminists going to the Middle East to "preach" feminism. Just because people aren't doing what you think would be best for the movement isn't a reason to dismiss the entire movement as garbage. Nice try, though. Go research what I told you to research, and then we'll talk, eh?

  • Now, I know that this is out of topic but, Satans success around the world is in making people think that he doesn't exist and neither does God. So atheists can come with comebacks like the Big Bang. Sure, we know how it started, but they can NEVER explain to why it is, things don't start out of thin air.

  • Heh, everything went off-topic. This isn't about God, you have the right to choose.

    I just don't understand why do we need feminism in the modern world. It has achieved it's purpose. The only ones who keep it alive is the ones who do it for the money, or saw their goals achieved and now find themselves with no purpose, so they keep it alive through false statistics and promoting misandry at the same time.

  • I don't know if this is the comment you're bitching that I haven't yet responded. Either way, here you go:

    Anyone promoting misandry would not be labeled a feminist. Also, please go look up Third Wave Feminism in order to understand "the need for Feminism in the modern world."

  • not that it matters but things DO start out of mid air and there wastn't any air (aiethiest have ltos of holes in their retarded theory)

  • Atheists don't have a theory. "A" is a prefix that means not or without. "Theism" means belief in the existence of one God viewed as the creative source of the human race. Just because I don't believe in "God" doesn't mean I have a theory about the creation of the universe. If you're talking about evolution though, you may have wanted to mention that instead of "aeithiests."

  • so its even more stupid then i thought they base their religion on god not existing that means they cant possible be right thats funny.

  • youloseilol, you're really letting your ignorance show, hon. Get a grip on Wikipedia for Cryst's sake. First, Atheism isn't a religion. Second, you just created the most retarded tautology (another word for you to look up) I've ever heard.

  • wikipedia's only about 80% acurite "hun" and aithiesm is pretty much saying that you dont have a reliegon so i would consider it an abstance of religion so again my point stands they cant possible be right so reliegon>aithism

  • Even 80% would kick ass all over your last comment. Atheism doesn't have anything to do with religion. It literally means "without god." Consequently, if you don't believe in a god, you probably don't go to church or identify with a religion, but that's besides the point. You're not even making an argument. Again, look up tautology.

  • Feminism is a movement, and it has people in it, and last time I checked people have brains and often have their own agendas.

    That being said, how the hell can you protect it by reading it's the description from a dictionary, that doesn't mean anything.

    I can call myself a Christian and hurt people at the same time, does that make me a "good" one ?

    Feminism is good for women but up to a point, not all of it is that pink, try to think about that.

  • I quoted the dictionary because most people have an incorrect definition of feminism to begin with.

    And I'd say you were a good Christian if you hurt people because the bible tells you to do so (but this is the thesis of another video of mine). There are countless violent verses in Christian's holy text, but this is really beside the point.

  • Well, Jesus is the son of God, and while on Earth he changed the flaws in the Bible that were made by the corupt and the mentality of that era.

    Yes, some high-ranking priest changed it so it would be more to their liking. The only "violence" that Jesus promoted was the one which the man/woman is allowed to protect himself only if the other person threatens their family or themselves.

    To God there is no such thing as a man or a woman, just your actions.

  • Now that you have an argument, The feminist Gramararain will not answer you. lol.

  • No, SuperPais. You're wrong again.

    His argument is completely irrelevant to this video. That is why I will not answer him.

    Don't you have anything better to do than troll my vids and make shit up? If not, I sincerely pity your existence.

  • TheGrammarian (1 hour ago) " No, SuperPais. You're wrong again. His argument is completely irrelevant to this video. That is why I will not answer him."

    BUT 2 weeks ago:

    TheGrammarian " you were a good Christian if you hurt people because the bible tells you to do so. There are countless violent verses in Christian's holy text."

    So why you answer him 2 weeks ago ? ?

  • 22-

    Why? Cause you have double standards. When you answer him, is ABOUT THE topic. When he answers u back and you got no answer, IS OUT OF TOPIC .

  • You're right. I was drawn away by his red herring.

    Good call.

  • I am coming out of the Feminist closet right now, I just before I had always associated feminisim enough with man hating and thinking wemon 'should' work outside the home. I belive in equal rights for wemon, and I understand the benifits of stay at home parenting.

  • That's wonderful. And if you wanted to be a stay at home mom, that would be your decision. As a feminist, I stand for your right to make that decision. Welcome to the club. =)

  • hi can you delete my extra comments, they were supposed to be replies underneath some other comments, I hit the reply, but this is what happened, it looks stupid, this is a relpy too lets see what happens

  • beckezmail "I am coming out of the Feminist closet right now, " .... "it looks stupid, this is a relpy too lets see what happens "

    Well, what can I say ? You become feminist, so ....

  • SuperPais, that doesn't even make sense. You need to start writing you comments in your own language and then sending them through a translator. I bet we'd get a better read of what you're really trying to say, and you might even get someone to argue with you. Unfortunately, we can't understand your gibberish, so don't expect intelligence responses to your nonsense.

  • TheGrammarian, you are the only one complaing that my english is a non-sense. But, if you want to tell me "a translator", go ahead. It will be useful for my friends, males and women.

    Until them, if you dont understand, dont answer.

    Easy, even for a feminist lol.

  • See SuperPais, that is an ad hominem attack. Because I'm a feminist, I can't understand, right?

    You're a hypocrite.

    Please, do a Google search for a translator and stop commenting with gibberish bullshit or else I will block you and take away whatever sick pleasure you get out of harassing my viewers.

  • Seems to me that he doesn't need one, maybe your period is acting again.

  • Yes, it seems you would understand SuperPais's English.

    You masculist misogynists and your ad hominem attacks are really starting to irritate me. Make an argument or don't comment.

    PS My period doesn't act. It hasn't graduated from theater school yet.

  • I'm not a misogynist, I only respect women that deserve respect. Not some feminist bitch that messes around with statistics and wines about imaginary things.

    Oh and please, take your talented period and jump off a building.

  • And it's not "SuperPais's English" it's SuperPais' English. Maybe you should start learning english again.

  • You're a moron. You need to check your grammar before you challenge TheGrammarian. Possessives that end in a "s" stylistically can be written either with just an apostrophe or an apostrophe "s", but it is typically a no-no to use just an apostrophe when you're not indicating plural possessive.

    English is capitalized, idiot.

  • Again, make an argument or don't comment.

  • Oh well, you sure like to pick on other peoples English, well honey, I'm not from either England or America. And at least I can speak Romanian, English, French and some Spannish. How many can you speak if you're so smart.

  • Sugar, make an argument. This video is not about language. The only reason language came up was because I can't understand SuperPais. You're back pedaling because I called you out. Just drop it.

  • Well listen to the hypocrite and her tough talk. Make an argument or don't comment, huh? I've given some valid arguments and you couldn't respond. I tried to add more comments at a later date and I was blocked.

    The ONLY thing you're interested in is listening to the whiny people who agree with you, and belittle those who are not equipped enough to debate. Some intellectual you are.

    You'll remember me by my other name which is Kalago55.

  • You're a liar. You are not blocked and have never been blocked by my account. You posted minimal comments on other people's ideas, not your own, and they were addressed as such.

    Stop making shit up.

  • I posted comments on my ideas and also historical fact. Now those were addressed as such, so you stop making shit up!

  • Nice try, but no.

    I don't delete comments, nor do I block those who disagree with me.

    Now, make an argument or don't comment. Thanks!

  • yoo Grammy -- Mike is being a jerk -- not because he clearly disagrees but because he makes cheap shots and lies, then supposes that equals intelligent discussion or lends to his position. To me it just shows he's another forgettable angry troll that is taking out his emotions on youtube feminists. BOOORING!!!

  • LOL Grammy?? I'm 22! ;)

  • lol, don't like nicknames? I won't call you that anymore then --- but I give them to everyone regardless of age. I'm annoying ;)

  • Thank Grammarian for posting this video and sharing a bit of your journey as a feminist so far. And just because it seems appropriate: I am proud to say I'm a male feminist.

  • Thank you for your support! I really appreciate it. As you can see from the comments on this video, I mostly catch shit for my views. The support is a welcomed change. =)

  • I am not only a proud feminist, I am a card-carrying Radical Feminist ;)

    I can't even describe to you the hateful comments, as well as hate mail and threats, I have received from people (mostly men) because I publicly say I am a feminist.

    Keep truckin' Grammarian

  • Marriage shouldn't be like the russian roulette, if you don't keep a woman happy 24/7 she will leave with your child and half of your house. And she most of the time does that beacause the feminist crap.

  • Women are trying to make men their underdogs and destroying family, no country can't survive without family values, that's why there's so much shit in america right now. But they think we are just going to sit and watch, men's rights movement is growing every day. They are fighting a losing war, but we are the ones who will laugh in the end.

  • "Family Values" is a nonsensical political phrase that serves as a vehicle for pushing one's religious views on others. The reason there's so much "shit in america right now" is a subtle blend of twisted national consciousness, poor education, and divisiveness of the sort that is most frequently caused by religion.

  • NO country will survive without family values in the long run. And even though you're an atheist, you should pick up the bible from time to time, it certaily doesn't teach you bad things.

    If you don't like it shut up and don't diss God more than you already did.

  • Stoning adulterers? Punishing people for eating pork or planting wheat and corn in the same field? Those aren't bad things?

    The patriarchal family is just ONE social model. There are many other, perhaps better, choices.

  • HanifXHier "I never said anything even remotely like that! You're silly"

    I think jigodie dont say nothing about "stoning adulters", lol.

    Double standards, humm.

  • he was talking sbout things in the bible

  • beckezmail "he was talking sbout things in the bible "

    Who? Hanifax? Who cares what is talking about. The point is that Jigodie never talked about that, so, its a lie, or an "Ad Hominen " attack. A logical falacie.