What makes a nation great is not how many wars they can start or how many poor innocent ppl they can murder. A nations great ppl and great actions make it great.
bcause iran invented freedom, the wheel and has always caused the world to become more and more civillised or has contributed the most greatly to meet that end and some "proud to be white" or whATEVER assholes are jealous of Iran WHILE they are being led by their temptations and not doing anything to improve the world and the only way they hold on to their power is by SAYING IRAN IS THE ENEMY, AS IF THAT QUALIFIES THEM TO LEAD THE GREAT Nations they r in, like america or canada.
Can someone tell me why Pakistan/Israel and India, countries that surround IRAN have nuclear weapons without signing the NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY....and yet people still expect Iran to comply?
MajNorberg - maybe because Iran and Iraq along with Saudi have 70% of the remaining oil and with only 40 years of oil left the US needs to control it. Iran is a very tough war - the only quick cheap way to win it is with a Nuclear Strike - so all these dumb excuses relate to the need to exterminate the persians to take the oil.
A new assessment by American intelligence agencies made public Monday concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The U.S. national security adviser, Stephen Hadley
(Lawrence Jackson/The Associated Press) December 3, 2007
Accusing Iran is of course a convenient means for shifting blame for the failure in what was declared by President Bush to be a defining moment for the US war in Iraq—a key test of the ability of the US-trained Iraqi forces to operate independently. Petraeus, one of the architects of the so-called surge strategy, has to explain to Congress why the Iraqi security forces, on which Washington has spent more than $22 billion, proved unable to carry out the Basra operation. Symonds 07 Apr 2008
It is also a matter of public record that the USA demanded of the Taliban Afghan' government that they turn over Bin Laden to their custody and, when the Afghan' government asked for some measure of evidence - a normal requirement in extradition matters between sovereign states - this request was unilaterally refused by the USA.
Admiral William Fallon, the US military commander for the Middle East, has stepped down from his post amid reports he disagreed with the US president over his policies on Iran.
It is a shame that lies can give way to so much confusion.Every apparent riddle in this discussion arises from unquestioning trust in stated causes and reasons underlying US policy. It is not difficult to find that Iran, for example, poses no threat to the world and least of all to the US. US is not, and rarely has been, concerned about world security furthermore if the US gov. were concerned about it, the last thing it should do is invade another country justifying itself with false accusations
In this video it is been taken as truth the fact that there exist indications of intentions of manufacturing nuclear weapons by the iranian government take for example the words of Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency about the nonexistent secret nuclear enrichment facility:
"(baseless) accusations that information has been withheld from the Board about Irans nuclear programme.I am dismayed by the allegations of some Member states, which have been fed to the media, that information has been withheld from the Board. These allegations are politically motivated and totally baseless.Such attempts to influence the work of the Secretariat and undermine its independence and objectivity are in violation of Article VII.F. of the IAEA Statute and should cease forthwith".
it is weird... nuclear deterrence is like, an anti-Utopia. Everyone has these horrible devices, and as a result everyone is safe? It is weird, but it is also reasonable
Never in history has so much hatred towards the USA and Britain since the invasion of the middle east .this is the true reason for the collapse of US banking system. and loss of its superpower status. more big guns are pointing at the US than ever.
I agree more hatred of the US is caused by our over seas adventures.
Its not the cause of the banking collapse. You really want to know why banks collapsed? Fiat money, fractional reserve banking and really dumb regulations. Some that had nothing to do with consumer protection. I have a video that explains what fiat money is. Actually more then one. Check them out
it is disturbing how calm and cheerful these guys are acting while telling us about the corruption that goes on behind the back of the public.. i know they are the good guys, i'm merely commenting about how normal this seems to be in their mind
Here's my theory. If Iran does not develop nuclear weapons, "we" WILL invade it 100%, and quite possibly at the expense of a false-flag operation. If Iran does develop nuclear weapons, they will use them as a deterrent and will therefore not be invaded. I do not believe Iran is foolish enough to deploy them against anyone, for obvious reasons.
i would have to respectfully disagree on this one... i believe that "we" will never actually invade iran under the Obama administration because this would mean the demise of the american empire, unless we use nuclear force against them, which we will not do.... they have a huge army and everyone will become loyal to the ruling regime if an exterior force attacks.. Israel will strike first and then well be forced in with it and thats when we're screwed
We could beat them in a war.I don't believe that would end our empire but, the nation building that would proceed would end the empire for sure. I honestly believe that Iran always was more of a threat then Iraq could ever be. I also believe their neighbors should have taken care of it or at least take the main role. We should mind our own business pretty much.
if you mean the same way we beat Iraq, as in "mission accomplished" sure we can... but you will never have total control over it, our empire will fall because the whole population will fuel the insurgency that will become another vietnam, another afghanistan... so no we cant accomplish and kind of victory by going INTO iran... the only way would be to bomb it from outside by nukes which is nuts!
hang on, you said that "we will never actually invade Iran," but then you went on to say that we will "be forced in with it" when Israel "strike(s) first."
it is both just as i said and you reiterated after me lol ... we will never actually INVADE... we will back up.. the end result is the same, we will not gain anything
Who was threatening to invade Iraq prior to their nuclear development? Oh wait, that never happened. It's all to do with the timing of geopolitical action. You, Sir, are the fucking moron.
@1Nyro Learn to read Nero! I said Iran you fuking midget! Who was threatening to develop nuclear weapons? IRAQ! Who thumbed their nose at UN inspectors? IRAQ? Who kept shooting at US planes while they enforced the
"no fly zone" implemented by the UN? IRAQ? Who now has lost their country? IRAQ? Your are either five years old or just stupid.
@1Nyro No one was threatening to invade Iran prior to them attemting to develop nuclear weapons you mosquito. Now that they are threatening to develop nuclear weapons, they might face occupation! You are so bass-ackwards in your thoughts that you must be an Obama loving communist! You are aren't you? Confess commie pig!
I don't know where you get the idea that I support Obama or Communism, because I hate both and I am against war on Iran, which is primarily for Israeli interests. Understand that if they do not develop nuclear weapons, like Iraq failed to, they will be invaded, one way or another, I guarantee it. This is because if they have nuclear weapons, there will be a stalemate. Ever seen the movie WarGames?
@1Nyro The simple truth is that no one is threatening to invade Iran! Simple as that! No one! The only threats have come as a result of the pursuit of nuclear weapons. Period. WHO IS THREATENING TO INVADE IRAN PRIOR TO THEIR TRYING TO DEVELOP? You aren't making sense or you are trying to base your statements on movies you watch....One is real and one isn't!
@1Nyro Oh yeah, we couldn't wait to get into resource rich Afghanistan, right? Had Saddam headed our warnings and not played cat and mouse with UN inspectors, we wouldn't have invaded! Similarly, if Iran heads our warnings they will not be invaded. Iran is engaging in behavior that upsets the stability of the global security and will be dealt with harshly if they do not comply!
Its amazing, Obama and Brown, Sarkozy etc know better than the vast teams at their disposal who all say Iran gave up its pursuit in 2003, does that mean Obama etc are privy to information they are not sharing with their people....?
The former Israeli FM Tzipi Lvigni herself said on record that Iran does not pose a threat to Israel but that story was well buried
This has been flagged as spam show
hallo Brothers, Sisters
we must help and inform all people worldwide!
The Truth ist always patient ! the lie is calling for jugdement (but not with war!) ..with the POWER of TRUTH WORDS!
Jesus is Son of God and the true Christians and Muslims and all other are Brothers an have the Same GOD of LOVE and therfore of LIFE!
please sign the international PETITION
APOCALYPSE-NO. NET !!!
Thank you Wolfgang Eggert - a true german patriot
Viking78eh 1 year ago
What makes a nation great is not how many wars they can start or how many poor innocent ppl they can murder. A nations great ppl and great actions make it great.
seannouri 2 years ago 3
bcause iran invented freedom, the wheel and has always caused the world to become more and more civillised or has contributed the most greatly to meet that end and some "proud to be white" or whATEVER assholes are jealous of Iran WHILE they are being led by their temptations and not doing anything to improve the world and the only way they hold on to their power is by SAYING IRAN IS THE ENEMY, AS IF THAT QUALIFIES THEM TO LEAD THE GREAT Nations they r in, like america or canada.
seannouri 2 years ago
Can someone tell me why Pakistan/Israel and India, countries that surround IRAN have nuclear weapons without signing the NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY....and yet people still expect Iran to comply?
MajNorberg 2 years ago 2
MajNorberg - maybe because Iran and Iraq along with Saudi have 70% of the remaining oil and with only 40 years of oil left the US needs to control it. Iran is a very tough war - the only quick cheap way to win it is with a Nuclear Strike - so all these dumb excuses relate to the need to exterminate the persians to take the oil.
PeterSodhi 2 years ago
Because Iran is run by psychos! dah
dagon3458 1 year ago
A new assessment by American intelligence agencies made public Monday concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The U.S. national security adviser, Stephen Hadley
(Lawrence Jackson/The Associated Press) December 3, 2007
MajNorberg 2 years ago
Accusing Iran is of course a convenient means for shifting blame for the failure in what was declared by President Bush to be a defining moment for the US war in Iraq—a key test of the ability of the US-trained Iraqi forces to operate independently. Petraeus, one of the architects of the so-called surge strategy, has to explain to Congress why the Iraqi security forces, on which Washington has spent more than $22 billion, proved unable to carry out the Basra operation. Symonds 07 Apr 2008
MajNorberg 2 years ago
It is also a matter of public record that the USA demanded of the Taliban Afghan' government that they turn over Bin Laden to their custody and, when the Afghan' government asked for some measure of evidence - a normal requirement in extradition matters between sovereign states - this request was unilaterally refused by the USA.
MajNorberg 2 years ago
March.11(tues)2008
Admiral William Fallon, the US military commander for the Middle East, has stepped down from his post amid reports he disagreed with the US president over his policies on Iran.
MajNorberg 2 years ago
It is a shame that lies can give way to so much confusion.Every apparent riddle in this discussion arises from unquestioning trust in stated causes and reasons underlying US policy. It is not difficult to find that Iran, for example, poses no threat to the world and least of all to the US. US is not, and rarely has been, concerned about world security furthermore if the US gov. were concerned about it, the last thing it should do is invade another country justifying itself with false accusations
badiscas 2 years ago
In this video it is been taken as truth the fact that there exist indications of intentions of manufacturing nuclear weapons by the iranian government take for example the words of Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency about the nonexistent secret nuclear enrichment facility:
badiscas 2 years ago
"(baseless) accusations that information has been withheld from the Board about Irans nuclear programme.I am dismayed by the allegations of some Member states, which have been fed to the media, that information has been withheld from the Board. These allegations are politically motivated and totally baseless.Such attempts to influence the work of the Secretariat and undermine its independence and objectivity are in violation of Article VII.F. of the IAEA Statute and should cease forthwith".
badiscas 2 years ago
good video
pedroquintero 2 years ago
Literally the only reason were not invading Iran is because we realize they can defend themselves and were stretched for resources.
Like if that weren't the case there would be a bunch of neocons planning phoney pretexts for an invasion right now.
AndroidPolitician 2 years ago
No one should have control of something like a nuclear bomb. No one person or one country should be able to cause that much devastation so easily.
jim15ratm 2 years ago
it is weird... nuclear deterrence is like, an anti-Utopia. Everyone has these horrible devices, and as a result everyone is safe? It is weird, but it is also reasonable
Craigipedia 2 years ago
I agree that Iran should not have nukes only if Israel is disarmed of their 400 nukes
studape 2 years ago 10
personally i believe all countries should atleast have 1 nuke that would usher the beginining of a new era, an era of No Wars.
Iranians have seen what happened to Iraq, they would be foolish if they are infact not seeking a nuclear weapon
Bigwheels161616 2 years ago 2
@studape israel will NEVER be disarmed, trust
dradexx 8 months ago
gee, if another country occupied yours wouldn't you work to fortify your resistance. wow, great analysis, zzzzzzzzzz
drewster85 2 years ago
I love Ray McGovern. I could listen to him all day. Too bad smart guys like these two men in this video aren't listened to by those in charge.
JixMa 2 years ago
Never in history has so much hatred towards the USA and Britain since the invasion of the middle east .this is the true reason for the collapse of US banking system. and loss of its superpower status. more big guns are pointing at the US than ever.
melodymaker65 2 years ago
I agree more hatred of the US is caused by our over seas adventures.
Its not the cause of the banking collapse. You really want to know why banks collapsed? Fiat money, fractional reserve banking and really dumb regulations. Some that had nothing to do with consumer protection. I have a video that explains what fiat money is. Actually more then one. Check them out
Daniel44125 2 years ago
their hatred did not cause the collapse of the banking system.
1Nyro 2 years ago
Nuclear capability is a natural extension to any prosperous country.
Freedom to bear nuclear arms!
jesuschrustpizza 2 years ago
Iran is alright by me.
oldhacks 2 years ago 4
it is disturbing how calm and cheerful these guys are acting while telling us about the corruption that goes on behind the back of the public.. i know they are the good guys, i'm merely commenting about how normal this seems to be in their mind
zayadnay 2 years ago
Here's my theory. If Iran does not develop nuclear weapons, "we" WILL invade it 100%, and quite possibly at the expense of a false-flag operation. If Iran does develop nuclear weapons, they will use them as a deterrent and will therefore not be invaded. I do not believe Iran is foolish enough to deploy them against anyone, for obvious reasons.
Nuclear weapons= no war.
No nuclear weapons= war.
1Nyro 2 years ago 7
exactly!
Mahoivlich 2 years ago
i would have to respectfully disagree on this one... i believe that "we" will never actually invade iran under the Obama administration because this would mean the demise of the american empire, unless we use nuclear force against them, which we will not do.... they have a huge army and everyone will become loyal to the ruling regime if an exterior force attacks.. Israel will strike first and then well be forced in with it and thats when we're screwed
zayadnay 2 years ago
We could beat them in a war.I don't believe that would end our empire but, the nation building that would proceed would end the empire for sure. I honestly believe that Iran always was more of a threat then Iraq could ever be. I also believe their neighbors should have taken care of it or at least take the main role. We should mind our own business pretty much.
Daniel44125 2 years ago
if you mean the same way we beat Iraq, as in "mission accomplished" sure we can... but you will never have total control over it, our empire will fall because the whole population will fuel the insurgency that will become another vietnam, another afghanistan... so no we cant accomplish and kind of victory by going INTO iran... the only way would be to bomb it from outside by nukes which is nuts!
zayadnay 2 years ago
Yeah, pretty much
Daniel44125 2 years ago
hang on, you said that "we will never actually invade Iran," but then you went on to say that we will "be forced in with it" when Israel "strike(s) first."
which is it?
1Nyro 2 years ago
it is both just as i said and you reiterated after me lol ... we will never actually INVADE... we will back up.. the end result is the same, we will not gain anything
zayadnay 2 years ago
"back-up"; call it what you will, it is still an invasion. fuck zionism and everyone who sucks on it.
1Nyro 2 years ago 2
@1Nyro who was threatening to invede Iran prior to their nuclear development? No one. you are a moron
spock3283 1 year ago
Who was threatening to invade Iraq prior to their nuclear development? Oh wait, that never happened. It's all to do with the timing of geopolitical action. You, Sir, are the fucking moron.
1Nyro 1 year ago
@1Nyro Learn to read Nero! I said Iran you fuking midget! Who was threatening to develop nuclear weapons? IRAQ! Who thumbed their nose at UN inspectors? IRAQ? Who kept shooting at US planes while they enforced the
"no fly zone" implemented by the UN? IRAQ? Who now has lost their country? IRAQ? Your are either five years old or just stupid.
spock3283 1 year ago
@1Nyro No one was threatening to invade Iran prior to them attemting to develop nuclear weapons you mosquito. Now that they are threatening to develop nuclear weapons, they might face occupation! You are so bass-ackwards in your thoughts that you must be an Obama loving communist! You are aren't you? Confess commie pig!
spock3283 1 year ago
I don't know where you get the idea that I support Obama or Communism, because I hate both and I am against war on Iran, which is primarily for Israeli interests. Understand that if they do not develop nuclear weapons, like Iraq failed to, they will be invaded, one way or another, I guarantee it. This is because if they have nuclear weapons, there will be a stalemate. Ever seen the movie WarGames?
1Nyro 1 year ago
@1Nyro The simple truth is that no one is threatening to invade Iran! Simple as that! No one! The only threats have come as a result of the pursuit of nuclear weapons. Period. WHO IS THREATENING TO INVADE IRAN PRIOR TO THEIR TRYING TO DEVELOP? You aren't making sense or you are trying to base your statements on movies you watch....One is real and one isn't!
spock3283 1 year ago
Oh please, they always had their eye on Iran, just like they always had their eye on Iraq and Afghanistan.
1Nyro 1 year ago
@1Nyro Oh yeah, we couldn't wait to get into resource rich Afghanistan, right? Had Saddam headed our warnings and not played cat and mouse with UN inspectors, we wouldn't have invaded! Similarly, if Iran heads our warnings they will not be invaded. Iran is engaging in behavior that upsets the stability of the global security and will be dealt with harshly if they do not comply!
spock3283 1 year ago
At the expense of another false-flag operation, yeah?
1Nyro 1 year ago
its the way of the world you get desensitized to it if you're not green.
lordblazer 2 years ago
lol @ 6:46
Dorke1337 2 years ago
Its amazing, Obama and Brown, Sarkozy etc know better than the vast teams at their disposal who all say Iran gave up its pursuit in 2003, does that mean Obama etc are privy to information they are not sharing with their people....?
The former Israeli FM Tzipi Lvigni herself said on record that Iran does not pose a threat to Israel but that story was well buried
ancientoneuk 2 years ago 4
I know
There so many lies that you have to believe some them without knowing its a lie.
Kite208 2 years ago
Americans cants comprehend blow back. Doomed to fail i fear :(
martinaoe2 2 years ago 2
Same to you American!
h0tie 2 years ago
listen, fuck isreal and hiel Iran and Hiel Ahmadinejad.
UchihaAsif 2 years ago 4