Bill is such an asshole. Seriously. Rather than listening to Dawkins' arguments, Bill quickly cuts him off and throws out his prepared responses based entirely on faith.
"You give me the impression of someone who has never read the arguments againast your position."
My goodness, is religion the only reason Bill O'Reilly isn't going out and massacring men, women, and children? Certainly it hasn't stopped his sexual perversion.
There is no connection between Stalin's murdering and his balief in atheísm. Neither is there any connection between Hitler's murder and his belief in the Catholic Church.
@GaNopper Ah, but Hitler did attribute his actions to being inspired by Jesus and had the phrase "God with us" printed in German on the belt buckles of his soldiers. Besides that he held public sermons and talked about gods will in his book. Whether or not he would have done what he did, or done it as badly, without religion is merely speculation
Look. All the european religious nutjobs went over to america. It's only logical O'Reilly is so popular over there. America is a country made by european weirdos.
I can't believe that Fox puts an image up of Pol Pot, Mao & Stalin as ammunition against Atheists. These maniacal dictators may have been Atheists but that that had nothing to do with their bad behavior. It's an erroneous association that Jesus-Freaks commonly use when they can't keep up with a thinking Atheist. Maybe these three also liked rhubarb pie, but you wouldn't say that eating rhubarb pie causes you to kill people. It's all such bullshit. Dawkins for the win!
Why does he agree to do this? How appalling that all of Richard's achievements, contributions to science and works in science writing are reduced to simply 'Richard Dawkins: Atheist'.
Nevermind that Dawkins is an author, evolutionary biologist, or an emeritus fellow. Nevermind that he has taught at Oxford or Berkeley, and is arguably one of the great thinkers and mental liberators of our time. My 60 something parents who squander their time watching your network really only need to see him presented as...RICHARD DAWKINS - ATHEIST.
If you watch all of their arguments in order you can see how O'Rielly degenerates into just insulting Dawkins and verbally bashing him, he barely holds onto pretending to have a conversation and tries to remedy the situation and pretend he wasn't a prick for the thing by letting Dawkins have the last word.
WTF?!? What an idiot... Why is he shouting? What's wrong with that guy? A host should be objective and not biased as that. On german TV there are many dumb people - but they would never engage such a cretin! How can it be this O'Reilly is employed in a TV station of that big country?
Unbelievable O'Reilly! ... your interview with Mr Dawkins was disgusting and biased it reeks of low class ignorance and good old fashioned intolerance. Yet again your missing the point, there's a surprise. erm, saturday night sinner and sunday repentor springs to mind here very poor taste indeed ... tut tut.
@webhutspain omg ive never laughed so hard over stupidity before. Seince does know how the moon came to be. But if you would only google it for 5 seconds you would know that. But nooo that would mean acually doing rsearch and looking things up and dare i even say it... Using you're head to think for once.
@webhutspain omg ive never laughed so hard over stupidity before. Seince does know how the moon came to be. But if you would only google it for 5 seconds you would know that. But nooo that would mean acually doing rsearch and looking things up and dare i even say it... Using you're head to think for once.
@33stribe Go on then, tell me the science that shows us why the moon is there - then we'll see who is laughing. Remember, it's science we are looking for. Good luck.
@33stribe Just as I thought you present the GIH theory. There is no science behind this, you do realize this don't you?
Stuart Ross Taylor: "The Best models for lunar origin are the testable ones, but the testable ones are all wrong." Irwin Shapiro.The best explanation for the moon is that it is an illusion!
GIH has arisen not so much because of the merits of its theory as because of the apparent dynamical or geochemical short-comings of other theories. A Ruzicka (Inter. Geology Review)
@webhutspain Bill-O asked about where the moon goes at night; not where it came from. Dawkins was referring to the fact that the earth rotates around the sun. You -and Bill- should have learned that in the first grade.
The only thing worse than O'Reilly's style is the fact that there are legions of Americans who respect him and think it's acceptable for him to interview people like that
It's a mistake for Dawkins to bother with an arrogant idiot like O'Rielly. He barely lets him speak and even when he lets him have a few prompted words I don't think O'Rielly even understand what Dawkins is saying. Moron.
omg this interview is totally backfiring on O'Reilly. He's so deaf blinded. He keeps repeating the same pointless argument it's impossible to reason with O'Reilly. It's like talking to a rude, impolite, dogged, whiney and bad mannered 5 year old with a mental disease.
Dr Dawkins, why are you even taking this "Billy Boy" seriously?
Oh. My. God. O'Really is the scum that slimeballs scoff at. He's a complete child and the fact that he still has his show is one of the worst travesties of modern life.
Why did Dawkins think O'Reilly would give a good debate? O'Reilly is an idiot, but Dawkins even more so for having faith in FOX and O'Reilly. Never go on FOX...
@PaladinswordSaurfang He's weeping for the fact that he's more intelligent than everyone who was looking at him whether in life or on television at that moment combined.
Why oh why does Prof Dawkins continue to suffer fools and blow-hards like Bill O'Reilly? It is such a waste of a great mind to even speak to people like this narrow-minded f***-tard.
Bill O'Reilly couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag.
O'Reilly is an asshole his argument is all about not allowing Richard Dawkins a moment to defend his own beliefs fairly who the hell had the bright idea of giving him his own show.
People that listen to Dawkins are as blind as people that listen to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity. Its about saying whatever people want to hear and making a lot of money doing so.
I really can't understand why Dawkins shows up in O'Reilly factor. Bill is an absolute retard. According to his opinions being Christian is equal to not killing someone. As if all non-Christian people are killers and the only commandment of Christianity is "thou shall not kill". It gets even worse when we realize the politicians supported by Bill, George Bush, Dick Cheney etc caused death of millions in Iraq. So, does Bush have priviliges or is he not Christian?
i got to give to dawkins, he does a good job at keeping his cool. people like oreilly are the most annoying type of people to argue against, and therefore also most difficult i find.
I must say, O'Reilly behaved rather well in this clip. Sure he has his same stubborn and silly views, but he didn't throw away any regard for respectful conversation as he often does.
@martinjackson909 Nope not a fan-boy of Dawkins. Was just searching for for-and-against issues on the topic of religion. Not a part of this 'debate' as you call it but you clearly regard me as an opponent immediately (and wrongly so). I assume you are a fan-boy of O'Reilly, judging from your response. To your second question: obviously not? What a stupid question.
Only one who sees one self as an object and a slave to superstition can utter what O'Reilly just said.
There's Religion and there's State Religion.
Some believe there is a God and that he/she should be followed without giving it much fought
Being an Idiot (A)
Some believe they can create Religions where it is aimed to the state. In these cases you dont' have a invisible God in most cases, but instead follow a human as a God.
Oh whyyyyyyyy do intelligent people like Dawkins go on a retarded show with a close minded bigot like O'Reilly...... Clearly not one thought of logic has crossed Bills mind...and he makes him look like the idiot he is!!!
@HiatusofSociety It's a free form of advertising and reinforces their argument against religion. If anything Dawkins greatly benefited from his numerous appearances on shows which are highly popular and highly idiotic.
@MCAlchemyOfficial I have a question about your comparison of the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment and religion. I am curious what you think the "cyanide" that could possibly kill the cat is in the religion context. I can't think of of a possible cyanide because many religions claim their Gods as immortal and omnipotent with no weakness.
@BlongBarble Richard Dawkins's audience is not impressionable kids and idiotic adults, that is religions market. critical thinkers and people who value evidence are his audience. People who value science o
@BlongBarble Spirituality is not on the rise. in fact, if you look at polls in the US and around the world non-belief ( atheism agnostics secularists) are on the rise. I would much rather believe that I die, then have the proposition of either thinking for myself and being tortured for eternity or subjugating myself to a deity that condones at advocates rape and racism.
Bill O'Reilly - my version talking to his loyal audience.
I spoke to Richard Dawkins a few days ago.
Now here is the edited version cut down to 4 minutes, so I Bill O'Reilly will look great while keeping to our Fixed News talking points.
As all you loyal, yet really naive audience will recognize is that I Bill O'Reilly don't like live interviews as I have a tendency of getting my ass kicked when facts take precedent over opinions which is my specialty.
O'Rielly is such a lovely tool. I love watching him discuss intelligent people, it's almost like having Jerry Springer back, only at least the guest is usually intelligent with O'Rielly.
wow this is actually the first time i've seen Bill o'reilly not shouting , not calling names, and letting an ATHEIST SPEAK ... omg ... improvements indeed...
Why Dawkins bothers trying to talk on an intellectual level with this baffoon is beyond any reality i can quantify, perhaps it's dawkins fault for thinking that children might be able to grow up without religious doctines until they are old enough to make their minds up for themselves, instead of being yolked with the religion of the parents, how dare he bring a little truth and logic into the lives of the intellectually challenged.
Maher: If the bible was written by god, then why is there stuff in the bible that’s not true?
O’Reilly: Well, because it’s allegorical Bill. I’m sure you know, they’re parables that are meant to teach you a greater truth. You know, it’s not a literalist interpretation.
Dawkins: I’m talking about myths from all over the world…
O’Reilly: The Judah Christian philosophy isn’t a myth; it’s reality
O’Reilly: The Judah Christian philosophy isn’t a myth; it’s reality
This is a lie. Genesis creation, like any other creation story, is a myth. It is not supported by any amount of historical or scientific data and should only be regarded as mythology. To say that it is reality is a bald face lie.
Theists that were mass murders: Hitler, Ivan the Terrible, Hirohito, Mumar Khadafi, Saddam Hussein, Benito Mussolini, Timothy McVeigh, Genghis Khan, The Popes who conducted the Inquisition, The Pope who started the Crusades, etc.
There I listed a lot more than three. Not that it proves anything (eitherway)
You know why Christianity is so big: because the Bible (as far is the prose goes) is not attributed to anyone in particular. It’s easy to point to L. Ron Hubbard, or Joseph Smith and say, “that guys clearly full of shit”
It’s much harder to talk some sense into someone when they believe that their bible was written by god. Props to whoever decided to make the bibles creation so mysterious. He figured out the key ingredient to forming a cult.
Yet again, spencerbenedict2 spreading his bullshit holy words insinuating anyone who does not live by Christianity is inferior. When in fact he's an embarrassment to the human race!
The biggest obstacle today is not belief or non-belief... but rather egocentric arrogance and lack of humbleness. human progress will evolve slowly until we admit that we don't know anything really.
Oh... and both of these guys needs a heavy mushroom trip.
So if a country is "founded" on a religion, it is promoted from mythology to true? I'm pretty sure we have societies where the mainstream religion was not christianity. So Greek polytheism is true now?
Oreilly is either really, really stupid or very, very manipulative
WoodmanWire 6 hours ago
Bill is such an asshole. Seriously. Rather than listening to Dawkins' arguments, Bill quickly cuts him off and throws out his prepared responses based entirely on faith.
"You give me the impression of someone who has never read the arguments againast your position."
- Hitch
Jakster840 11 hours ago
My goodness, is religion the only reason Bill O'Reilly isn't going out and massacring men, women, and children? Certainly it hasn't stopped his sexual perversion.
CyborgNinja7 3 days ago
religion destroys the world, i have absolutely no problem having professor dawkins mock it
plantech101 3 days ago
wiwi' COM OOONNN...
Redeemer216 3 days ago
There is no connection between Stalin's murdering and his balief in atheísm. Neither is there any connection between Hitler's murder and his belief in the Catholic Church.
Both were simply insane sociopaths.
GaNopper 3 days ago
@GaNopper Ah, but Hitler did attribute his actions to being inspired by Jesus and had the phrase "God with us" printed in German on the belt buckles of his soldiers. Besides that he held public sermons and talked about gods will in his book. Whether or not he would have done what he did, or done it as badly, without religion is merely speculation
boochainletters12 18 hours ago
I can't belive Richard agreed to talk with this idiot again for the third time
genia10 3 days ago
Richard don't waste your time with this idiot
delahorga 3 days ago
"I don't believe a meteor crashed into the earth and made everything happen"
What the fuck? Who believes that?
Netlocd 4 days ago
fuck O'reilly is a stupid cunt. You can't get the conversation higher than " atheists are Idiots"
lockide 4 days ago 2
only in america can this guy get a tv show.
insidecurry 6 days ago
Structural stupidity
Schizopantheist 1 week ago
Pot, Mao and Stalin also had two eyes, two legs, two arms, two ears, but ONLY one nose!
BillyBobJr3rd 1 week ago
Look. All the european religious nutjobs went over to america. It's only logical O'Reilly is so popular over there. America is a country made by european weirdos.
ChrischanJunk 1 week ago 14
@ChrischanJunk
You know that most atheist-dominated countries are in Europe right? France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Czech Republic?...
BlackPanteraSociety 4 days ago
@ChrischanJunk to leave behind the european brainiacs, who eventually left religion behind
quicksteps41 2 days ago
I can't believe that Fox puts an image up of Pol Pot, Mao & Stalin as ammunition against Atheists. These maniacal dictators may have been Atheists but that that had nothing to do with their bad behavior. It's an erroneous association that Jesus-Freaks commonly use when they can't keep up with a thinking Atheist. Maybe these three also liked rhubarb pie, but you wouldn't say that eating rhubarb pie causes you to kill people. It's all such bullshit. Dawkins for the win!
Sweence 1 week ago
Onkneesforjesus? What a weird image im getting
espyd21c 1 week ago 12
Why has this been edited?
The interview wasn't very long. It makes people think you're trying to manipulate the content for your own agenda.
MrLtPink 1 week ago
@MrLtPink I think that is the point, sadly.
codynewill 1 week ago
I hope Bill O'Reilly dies.
grahamdunne 1 week ago
@grahamdunne going out on a limb here: i guarantee you that he will
quicksteps41 2 days ago
Why does he agree to do this? How appalling that all of Richard's achievements, contributions to science and works in science writing are reduced to simply 'Richard Dawkins: Atheist'.
AlexRichardVocat 1 week ago
I know a smart man who also would kick Bill's ass ----------> RON PAUL 2012!!!
RonPaulArabworld 1 week ago
really o'reilly? the stalin, hitler argument again? that was the same thing you said last time dawkins was on.
MrStuff414 1 week ago
Why does Bill O'Reilly even need guests? He has the entire argument by himself because he doesn't let anyone finish a sentence.
Flash33181 1 week ago
O RLY?!
westside1love 1 week ago 2
Nevermind that Dawkins is an author, evolutionary biologist, or an emeritus fellow. Nevermind that he has taught at Oxford or Berkeley, and is arguably one of the great thinkers and mental liberators of our time. My 60 something parents who squander their time watching your network really only need to see him presented as...RICHARD DAWKINS - ATHEIST.
NorCAljd 2 weeks ago 4
Comment removed
NorCAljd 2 weeks ago
Bill.... please shut the fuck up. Nobody likes you.
XxI3ioHazardxX 2 weeks ago 3
Bill O Reilly's very existence is a threat to the intelligent world
Can somebody help
TruthOnly142 2 weeks ago 5
What a redneck
LukaJacov 2 weeks ago
I love O'Reiley
HitmanEF 2 weeks ago
@HitmanEF seeing as you cant spell O'reilly that speaks volumes about your intelligence.
yogos44 2 weeks ago
@yogos44 and seeing as that you failed to put the apostrophe on ''can't'' speaks volume about your intelligence
HitmanEF 2 weeks ago
@HitmanEF I can, but you're just not worth the time.
yogos44 2 weeks ago
If you watch all of their arguments in order you can see how O'Rielly degenerates into just insulting Dawkins and verbally bashing him, he barely holds onto pretending to have a conversation and tries to remedy the situation and pretend he wasn't a prick for the thing by letting Dawkins have the last word.
DisoBizKit 2 weeks ago
so white people who killed grater parts of african and american population, where restrained by religion!
mabbeman 2 weeks ago
@mabbeman That's different, God wanted them too.
HessenDragoon 2 weeks ago
Billy, please just stop, you bigoted moronic clown penis.
ToadsMGodes 2 weeks ago
0:56 What the fuck was that AHA!
Oreilly is a cunty goose.
tkotomy 2 weeks ago
I mean, how can they offer a plattform for somebody like that O'Reilly?
c4sh3w 3 weeks ago
WTF?!? What an idiot... Why is he shouting? What's wrong with that guy? A host should be objective and not biased as that. On german TV there are many dumb people - but they would never engage such a cretin! How can it be this O'Reilly is employed in a TV station of that big country?
c4sh3w 3 weeks ago
@c4sh3w its america where anything is possible...
yogos44 3 weeks ago
@Chopofiev Yes, and Hitler killed Christians, but he still praises Jesus in Mein Kampf.
MrMichaelblake 3 weeks ago
@c4sh3w Because the viewers (The Rednecks) love O'reilly.
Zanazuah 3 weeks ago
Religion isn't a constraint, it is used to justify the commission of heinous crimes.
Apparently dumbass O'Reilly never heard of dictators like Augusto Pinochet. Where was the religion that was supposed to constrain him from killing?
Ravensteinzh 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain lying how exactly?
lashby123 3 weeks ago
Go Richard! Fuck you bill O'Reilly you smug cunt!
anonymuas 3 weeks ago 2
Dawkins lying again. Yawn.
webhutspain 3 weeks ago
Unbelievable O'Reilly! ... your interview with Mr Dawkins was disgusting and biased it reeks of low class ignorance and good old fashioned intolerance. Yet again your missing the point, there's a surprise. erm, saturday night sinner and sunday repentor springs to mind here very poor taste indeed ... tut tut.
Movidaify 3 weeks ago 3
I go to Harvard, I come back stupid.
YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN THAT.
iKickComputers 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@webhutspain omg ive never laughed so hard over stupidity before. Seince does know how the moon came to be. But if you would only google it for 5 seconds you would know that. But nooo that would mean acually doing rsearch and looking things up and dare i even say it... Using you're head to think for once.
33stribe 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain omg ive never laughed so hard over stupidity before. Seince does know how the moon came to be. But if you would only google it for 5 seconds you would know that. But nooo that would mean acually doing rsearch and looking things up and dare i even say it... Using you're head to think for once.
33stribe 3 weeks ago
@33stribe Go on then, tell me the science that shows us why the moon is there - then we'll see who is laughing. Remember, it's science we are looking for. Good luck.
webhutspain 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain starchild(dot)gsfc(dot)nasa(dot)gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question38(dot)html
33stribe 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain or physicsworld(dot)com/cws/article/news/17802 This is all from under 45 seconds of looking for the awnsor
33stribe 3 weeks ago
@33stribe Just as I thought you present the GIH theory. There is no science behind this, you do realize this don't you?
Stuart Ross Taylor: "The Best models for lunar origin are the testable ones, but the testable ones are all wrong." Irwin Shapiro.The best explanation for the moon is that it is an illusion!
GIH has arisen not so much because of the merits of its theory as because of the apparent dynamical or geochemical short-comings of other theories. A Ruzicka (Inter. Geology Review)
webhutspain 3 weeks ago
Dawkins lied through his teeth.
webhutspain 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain When exactly did he lie?
LenusGaul 3 weeks ago
@LenusGaul In many things, but in particular when he says science knows how the moon came about. It doesn't.
webhutspain 3 weeks ago
@webhutspain Bill-O asked about where the moon goes at night; not where it came from. Dawkins was referring to the fact that the earth rotates around the sun. You -and Bill- should have learned that in the first grade.
MrMichaelblake 3 weeks ago
The only thing worse than O'Reilly's style is the fact that there are legions of Americans who respect him and think it's acceptable for him to interview people like that
chernobility 3 weeks ago
I don't know whether I should like or dislike this... Either way, up yours O'Reilly you giant moron.
KhadaKuraki 3 weeks ago
It's a mistake for Dawkins to bother with an arrogant idiot like O'Rielly. He barely lets him speak and even when he lets him have a few prompted words I don't think O'Rielly even understand what Dawkins is saying. Moron.
markh1011 3 weeks ago
omg this interview is totally backfiring on O'Reilly. He's so deaf blinded. He keeps repeating the same pointless argument it's impossible to reason with O'Reilly. It's like talking to a rude, impolite, dogged, whiney and bad mannered 5 year old with a mental disease.
Dr Dawkins, why are you even taking this "Billy Boy" seriously?
DelBrisee 4 weeks ago
0:56 must be the sound O'Reilly makes when two of his brain cells successfully work.
satinsguard 4 weeks ago
Oh. My. God. O'Really is the scum that slimeballs scoff at. He's a complete child and the fact that he still has his show is one of the worst travesties of modern life.
Graynumber 4 weeks ago
O'Reilly is such a massive twat. Lock the pair in a room for 4 hours and let Dawkins destroy O'Reilly with fact and reason.
bazerrem 4 weeks ago
If anyone wants me, I'll be in my trailer.
Stevo6452 4 weeks ago
How close-minded can you get? :(
tontsa911 1 month ago
"AAHH HAAA" you are answering my question but i dont want to hear more so i will interupt...
potenza999 1 month ago
Lol on knees for Jesus. I guess he does accept anyone. As long as there on their knees after dinner
WaleedDaGreat 1 month ago
O'Reilly is an idiot
horanstreet 1 month ago
O'Reilley should marry Anne Coulter!
Marcoplo 1 month ago
O'Reilley is an Ass!
Marcoplo 1 month ago
o'reilly has perfected the art of public trolling :)
Diosukekun 1 month ago
Why did Dawkins think O'Reilly would give a good debate? O'Reilly is an idiot, but Dawkins even more so for having faith in FOX and O'Reilly. Never go on FOX...
Russiansdoitbest 1 month ago
right at the end it kinda looks like Dawkins is going to cry :/
PaladinswordSaurfang 1 month ago
@PaladinswordSaurfang He's weeping for the fact that he's more intelligent than everyone who was looking at him whether in life or on television at that moment combined.
Graynumber 4 weeks ago
O'Reilly is such a clown. He really is nothing more than a cartoon. I'm actually surprised that Dawkins rose to his obvious provocations!
tobo86 1 month ago 2
Why oh why does Prof Dawkins continue to suffer fools and blow-hards like Bill O'Reilly? It is such a waste of a great mind to even speak to people like this narrow-minded f***-tard.
Bill O'Reilly couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag.
nikolai082700 1 month ago 2
Bill never lets his guests complete an argument. Either he knows he'll be owned, or he doesnt want to hear anything else than his own shite.
muusers 1 month ago 13
I am very much against violence, but I would really, really like to punch O'Reillys face at this moment.
tontsa911 1 month ago 34
@tontsa911 Comment of the day!!!!
Rev1981 1 month ago
@tontsa911 *Get to line then.. After me.
koponenii 1 month ago
@tontsa911 I give you half of my power so that the punch break his nose into pieces :) He is the biggest dickhead ever.
XmXeXnXtXoXrX 4 weeks ago
i wonder how dawkins can bare not to yell at that bill O'Reilly... i cannot stand him.
RIMA142142 1 month ago
O'Reilly is an asshole his argument is all about not allowing Richard Dawkins a moment to defend his own beliefs fairly who the hell had the bright idea of giving him his own show.
mrstevost 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
People that listen to Dawkins are as blind as people that listen to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity. Its about saying whatever people want to hear and making a lot of money doing so.
martinjackson909 1 month ago
I really can't understand why Dawkins shows up in O'Reilly factor. Bill is an absolute retard. According to his opinions being Christian is equal to not killing someone. As if all non-Christian people are killers and the only commandment of Christianity is "thou shall not kill". It gets even worse when we realize the politicians supported by Bill, George Bush, Dick Cheney etc caused death of millions in Iraq. So, does Bush have priviliges or is he not Christian?
mrnolan91 1 month ago
Lol at comparing atheism to communism... they are so different!
edantjam 1 month ago
i got to give to dawkins, he does a good job at keeping his cool. people like oreilly are the most annoying type of people to argue against, and therefore also most difficult i find.
perwaaler 1 month ago
"THOU SHALT NOT KILL.. UNLESS YOU ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THEN ITS ALL GOOD".. I guess there's a new version of the bible?
prodigy051985 1 month ago
I love DAWKINS, he always has the best answers !
xtremezmoez 1 month ago 2
I must say, O'Reilly behaved rather well in this clip. Sure he has his same stubborn and silly views, but he didn't throw away any regard for respectful conversation as he often does.
MsHojat 1 month ago
WoW just fucking WoW!
Fealka 1 month ago
O'Reilly makes a fool of himself
Sehenwurdigkeiten 1 month ago 24
@Sehenwurdigkeiten keep telling yourself that. Its amazing the way you can convince yourself something that is not true.
martinjackson909 1 month ago
@martinjackson909 You're amazing too thanks (in actually coming to the defense of O'Reilly's comments in this video).
Sehenwurdigkeiten 1 month ago
@Sehenwurdigkeiten Are you a fan-boy of Dawkins? Do you think Dawkins is always right just because he is an atheist? And that he won this debate?
martinjackson909 1 month ago
@martinjackson909 Nope not a fan-boy of Dawkins. Was just searching for for-and-against issues on the topic of religion. Not a part of this 'debate' as you call it but you clearly regard me as an opponent immediately (and wrongly so). I assume you are a fan-boy of O'Reilly, judging from your response. To your second question: obviously not? What a stupid question.
Sehenwurdigkeiten 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sehenwurdigkeiten You said "O'Reilly makes a fool of himself" even though he did well in this debate.
martinjackson909 1 month ago
@martinjackson909 You're retarded.
Graynumber 4 weeks ago
O'Reilly is an idiot. He makes absolutely no rebuttals of Dawkins points, and instead spews out the same thing over and over again.
WaitingForAlex 1 month ago
Only one who sees one self as an object and a slave to superstition can utter what O'Reilly just said.
There's Religion and there's State Religion.
Some believe there is a God and that he/she should be followed without giving it much fought
Being an Idiot (A)
Some believe they can create Religions where it is aimed to the state. In these cases you dont' have a invisible God in most cases, but instead follow a human as a God.
Being a Idiot (B)
Both are RELIGION! "Bronze age myths"
ProdigyBigBoss89 1 month ago
At 0:27 and 3:27 there's a weird skip in this vid, editing?
aussj4link 1 month ago
@aussj4link Yep. Funny these silly religious fools still lose the arugment even when they manipulate the source.
RB201111 1 month ago
Dawkins owned
chuckycostigan 1 month ago
Is it just me, or does O'Reilly deserve a nice, swift kick to the face?
Vroom246 1 month ago
@Vroom246
Several.
TranquilDome 1 month ago
@BlongBlarble it doesn't matter what you WANT to believe in. It matters what the evidence points towards.
relauraba 1 month ago
Oh whyyyyyyyy do intelligent people like Dawkins go on a retarded show with a close minded bigot like O'Reilly...... Clearly not one thought of logic has crossed Bills mind...and he makes him look like the idiot he is!!!
HiatusofSociety 1 month ago 3
@HiatusofSociety It's a free form of advertising and reinforces their argument against religion. If anything Dawkins greatly benefited from his numerous appearances on shows which are highly popular and highly idiotic.
fistfulofknowledge 1 month ago
Fuck me, O'Reilly is thick
BKKRED2008 1 month ago
My belief? Religion is right, and at the same time it is wrong. How did i come to that conclusion? Two words. Shroedingers Cat.
MCAlchemyOfficial 1 month ago
@MCAlchemyOfficial I have a question about your comparison of the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment and religion. I am curious what you think the "cyanide" that could possibly kill the cat is in the religion context. I can't think of of a possible cyanide because many religions claim their Gods as immortal and omnipotent with no weakness.
Bhaskaratheteacher 1 month ago
What has God been DOING these last 2000 or so years?????? Watching us???? I wonder if He decided to restart in some other corner of the multiverse.
Bhaskaratheteacher 1 month ago
dawkins is so well mannered.
animalolz 1 month ago
@animalolz so is oreily
martinjackson909 1 month ago
@martinjackson909 type in youtube, "bill o reilly geraldo rivera"
animalolz 1 month ago
bill oreily is an idiot
SuperLiamcahill 1 month ago
@BlongBarble Richard Dawkins's audience is not impressionable kids and idiotic adults, that is religions market. critical thinkers and people who value evidence are his audience. People who value science o
uaintgotnopankakemix 1 month ago
@BlongBarble Spirituality is not on the rise. in fact, if you look at polls in the US and around the world non-belief ( atheism agnostics secularists) are on the rise. I would much rather believe that I die, then have the proposition of either thinking for myself and being tortured for eternity or subjugating myself to a deity that condones at advocates rape and racism.
uaintgotnopankakemix 1 month ago
Bill O'Reilly - my version talking to his loyal audience.
I spoke to Richard Dawkins a few days ago.
Now here is the edited version cut down to 4 minutes, so I Bill O'Reilly will look great while keeping to our Fixed News talking points.
As all you loyal, yet really naive audience will recognize is that I Bill O'Reilly don't like live interviews as I have a tendency of getting my ass kicked when facts take precedent over opinions which is my specialty.
I am the master of "truthiness".
MrHoolits 1 month ago
1:14 LOL
keepthefunk 1 month ago
Interesting that it says "Richard Dawkins, atheist" Not, "Dr Richard Dawkins, Phd, Author, Ethologist."
I mean whenever the host is on screen it doesn't say, "Bill O'Reilly, Stark raving idiot, lunatic, religious fanatic" does it?
Cal6009 1 month ago
O'Rielly is such a 'parochial dick'.
Nwanyinma 1 month ago
O'Rielly is such a lovely tool. I love watching him discuss intelligent people, it's almost like having Jerry Springer back, only at least the guest is usually intelligent with O'Rielly.
MojoRisinist 1 month ago
Yeah, what about the thirty years war? It was started because of Christianity and took the lives of 7 million people.
JohnWorkerFortis 2 months ago
Jesus was a Jew, go figure...
target1712 2 months ago
They all had one thing in common, they had hair.
Southparker100000000 2 months ago 3
"AHA!" I lol'd
ebag10 2 months ago 3
i i like how o'reilly tries to see things that aren't there, explains a lot about his belief.
ledzeppelinrools 2 months ago in playlist More videos from OnKneesforJesus4
Why does this guy have his own tv show? Im not american so excuse me but damn this video works against him.
twentyoneandsix 2 months ago
wow this is actually the first time i've seen Bill o'reilly not shouting , not calling names, and letting an ATHEIST SPEAK ... omg ... improvements indeed...
RaitoDenki 2 months ago
Bill O'Reilly is a Sociopath
33Crazydude 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
03:45 till end, Dawkins should have mentioned how scientists know how the tide works.
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
Comment removed
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
Why Dawkins bothers trying to talk on an intellectual level with this baffoon is beyond any reality i can quantify, perhaps it's dawkins fault for thinking that children might be able to grow up without religious doctines until they are old enough to make their minds up for themselves, instead of being yolked with the religion of the parents, how dare he bring a little truth and logic into the lives of the intellectually challenged.
stephenboing 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
O'reilly FTW!!!
bobcatallstar7 2 months ago
AHA!
Christ, Billy boy here has the conversational maturity of a six year old.
TheMinxTail 2 months ago
i have nothing against religious people but bill is an epic cunt!
MrDavetheman 2 months ago 2
Maher: If the bible was written by god, then why is there stuff in the bible that’s not true?
O’Reilly: Well, because it’s allegorical Bill. I’m sure you know, they’re parables that are meant to teach you a greater truth. You know, it’s not a literalist interpretation.
Dawkins: I’m talking about myths from all over the world…
O’Reilly: The Judah Christian philosophy isn’t a myth; it’s reality
kockisyummy 2 months ago 27
This has been flagged as spam show
@kockisyummy
O’Reilly: The Judah Christian philosophy isn’t a myth; it’s reality
This is a lie. Genesis creation, like any other creation story, is a myth. It is not supported by any amount of historical or scientific data and should only be regarded as mythology. To say that it is reality is a bald face lie.
UNLebanon 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*BUDDHIST
MrMichaelblake 2 months ago
Theists that were mass murders: Hitler, Ivan the Terrible, Hirohito, Mumar Khadafi, Saddam Hussein, Benito Mussolini, Timothy McVeigh, Genghis Khan, The Popes who conducted the Inquisition, The Pope who started the Crusades, etc.
There I listed a lot more than three. Not that it proves anything (eitherway)
Also,
POL POT WAS A BUDDISHT!
MrMichaelblake 2 months ago 17
@MrMichaelblake Well, technically, Buddhists can be atheist. Still, your point stands strong and firm.
Sloth7d 2 months ago
@MrMichaelblake Good point, but there's no god in Buddhism.
RobotsRule15 2 months ago
@RobotsRule15 Yes, but they're still considered a "religion"
Also, Pol Pot believed in some kind of afterlife and his views towards "god" are kind of confusing. It's kind of hard to label him anything.
MrMichaelblake 2 months ago
@MrMichaelblake Hussein wasn't religous. neither was Khadafi, nor Khan.
martinjackson909 1 month ago
@martinjackson909
Hussein: Sunni Muslim
Khadafi: Islamic
Khan: Shaman
MrMichaelblake 1 month ago
@MrMichaelblake thats all true and fact but religion is still a idiotic idea
travissokol 1 month ago
@MrMichaelblake Pol Pot killed Buddhists he did nothing in the name of Buddhism
Chopofiev 1 month ago
Why does O’Reilly always think he can get sanctimonious with people that have never verbally or sexually abused their employees?
Jeffholdsworth 2 months ago
Epic A-HA
idontgiveafuck48 2 months ago
Buck Fill O'Reilly!
mrnolan91 2 months ago
By the way, Bill...
You believe in god, yet you're the one in this conversation with sexual harassment lawsuit. Coincidence?
bla87 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
You know why Christianity is so big: because the Bible (as far is the prose goes) is not attributed to anyone in particular. It’s easy to point to L. Ron Hubbard, or Joseph Smith and say, “that guys clearly full of shit”
It’s much harder to talk some sense into someone when they believe that their bible was written by god. Props to whoever decided to make the bibles creation so mysterious. He figured out the key ingredient to forming a cult.
bla87 2 months ago
what good was showing the pictures of stalin and mao? just like 'here they are...'
IR17171717 2 months ago
This is like me saying, 'I can fly, prove me wrong' instead of me having to prove that I can fly lol
Hulkamania4eva 2 months ago
If you need a book to tell you what's moral then you're not really a moral person
zepbach1 2 months ago
I wish Prof Dawkins had asked him whether he was going against the Catholic Church teaching that we have evolved.
hutchalm 2 months ago
Bill Orielly destroyed dawkins.
Dathinkingman 2 months ago
@Dathinkingman You're delusional if that's what you saw.
oldsoftee 2 months ago
Bill o'moron.
Marcuys 2 months ago
Yet again, spencerbenedict2 spreading his bullshit holy words insinuating anyone who does not live by Christianity is inferior. When in fact he's an embarrassment to the human race!
NickLiang 2 months ago
The biggest obstacle today is not belief or non-belief... but rather egocentric arrogance and lack of humbleness. human progress will evolve slowly until we admit that we don't know anything really.
Oh... and both of these guys needs a heavy mushroom trip.
geostigma123 2 months ago
So if a country is "founded" on a religion, it is promoted from mythology to true? I'm pretty sure we have societies where the mainstream religion was not christianity. So Greek polytheism is true now?
trekgeek1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system