Added: 1 month ago
From: aburke673
Views: 882
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (139)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How do you explain ancient Egypt???!!!

  • @BIGBROTHERXXII Egyptians were white Hamites. the hyksos pharoahs were R1B western European caucasoids. White people were in China pre 3000 b.c.. check out white mummies found in China who built the pyramids. the asiatic scythes, from Japeth and Japeth and Ham, brought asiatic mongols to Egypt as slaves to build pyramids. these asiatic mongols bred with negroid canaanites to produce the euroasian african populations.

  • @BIGBROTHERXXII civilization came from the caucases post ice age.

  • unfortunately the chinese are now succumbing to pressure to hidethe "euro" influence on asia and have taken the tocharians mummies out of the "silk road exhibit".They are also trying to hide the pyramids in china by planting crops on them.Now there is some odd activity in the gobi desert that looks like some sort of covering of portions of the land with white powder or something .Maybe there is some big archeology find they are covering >speculation of course

  • @brendanmichaelpix they should be forced to run DNA tests on all these artifacts that belong to the world.

  • One of the esoteric aspects of Tibetan Buddhism is so called Aryan theory which they subscribe to and one of the reasons for the hatred of the dali lamma is his acceptance and insitance of this idea.Of coarse the swastika is one of the prime symbols of asia as well as it has been found on the tocharian artifacts.Afrocentrist are trying to cover all this up but they cant get refute the chinese records of who the kushan were.they have many statues and they are clearly white.

  • @brendanmichaelpix the funniest thing to me, is the domesticated horse and the invention of the wheel came from Thracians prior to 3000 b.c.. The oldest written laws are from the greek Pelasgians. How could blacks rule in Africa, without a military horse calvery, a wheel, and domesticated seeds for farming.

  • I dont know about khan but the great "eastern" religions were founded by whites of one sort or another.the Indian vedic system which degraded into a mess called hinduism was started by rishi arya or aryans.Also the 1st emperor of china was a white and the great philosopher Lao Tzu was a tall thin white.If you have not done so look up the Kushan and yehuzi(yehudim)as well as the tocharians in the gobi desert who looked like modern scots with tartan weaved robes whos mummies are some of the oldest

  • @brendanmichaelpix True. Buddha was also a white with blue eyes, who broke off from the Aryan caste system in India. I think Buddha was a thracian military elite Fir Bolg. the noble class in China in 3000 b.c. were whites. whites were the first people in America way before Christopher Columbus, a basque.

  • dear killdevil, I found out that if Ghenghis Khan was related to the Turkish Uyghers living in China, then it is very likely he was a kushite from Afghanistan. If he had R1a DNA he was a central asian scythian. If he had R1B bloodline he had the blood line of Japeth from Armenia. He probably was of a mixed blood line like ther khazars. the scythian nobles often intermarried into the races they governed. they had no desire to keep a pure blood lineage, but to be a warrior elite class.

  • continued; if Khan was from the line of Perrizzites or Hittites, he was what you would term serpent seed and I would term Canaanite.

  • continued; Perrizzites were living in Canaan before the Hebrew israelites from Shem, Eber, Abraham.

  • continued; Hitities wer forerunners of the iron age and were developing iron weapons prior to the 14th century b.c. Israel was supposed to genocide the Hittites according to the old testament.

  • @aburke673 (I got this from one of my sources) Since Kain represents the first earthly ruler in the Bible it is likely that Kah is an very ancient root for ruler. Kahn means ruler.

    In the Nile region the Ka/Kah was the divine power that endowed the ruler with spiritual authority. (very interesting right?) Ironically the rulers of this earth today is the Rothschild Dynasty (so-called Jews). My opinion KENITES!

  • @killdevilz4 yes. Khan means King. 

  • Pushtans were an Afghan Indian mountain military people. their name literally meant kill the hindu, meaning the Hindu plains peoples. If the khazars have middle east DNA it is from the Pushtuns not the tribe of Judah from which the Levites were descended from Aaron, and Moses.

  • Fantastic video!

  • @DenEldenKrieg cool. thanks

  • even when u call ur name ( the brith trust) white u still end up as slavs of the bloodline..

    the US civilsation was set up by the bloodline and the surety barons's descendents ..george washington was related to all 23 surety barons

    ROme the beast system is based on the setting up of artficial scarcity so that the white slaves are pitted against the black slaves ..the end result is debt slavery for one and resource scacrcity for the other..wealth osmosis to the bloodline

  • @kdcruz75 pagan rome is the beast system not holy Rome.

  • @aburke673

    which bible do you read ...

    first off the bible is a result of the council of nicea...

    look up the definition of christian ..it is a follower of the nicean creed..

    constantine the pagan till his death.authorised the bible ..

    it is fully coded and only the bishops of rome can teach that code , when they decide to ..

    u cant pick a book on quantum physics and look at the code and decide for yourself what the authors meant..you need a teacher to help u decipher it

  • @kdcruz75

    like any religious text ..it is high science..ie one sentence has multiple meanings

    there is astrotheology in the same sentence ..at the same time there is modern banking trust law..as above so below..its a fractal mapping to create an accounting system

    it also talks about teh bloodline 99.99% of the world are not bloodline..the bloodline basically are trustees of the chief accountant, the Pope is the trustee of the trust the blood covenent.. they are jsut bookkeepers

  • @kdcruz75 Yes. NIcean creed is Christian. So is the Apostles Creed, the Saint Athanasian creed, and the profession of faith from the Council of Trent with the words from Vatican 1 added to the profession of faith at Trent.

  • @aburke673 (part 2) Abram paid tithe to Melchizedek (How can that be if Abram was the high priest of God?). Who was Melchizedek and why would a high priest pay tithes to this Melchizedek???

    Unless hmm??

    Jesus said in st John ch 8:56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see MY day: AND HE SAW IT, and was glad.

    58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS, I AM. (meaning Jesus was Melchizedek a.k.a MY KING IS JUST--- theres only one King of Kings and HE IS JUST)

  • @killdevilz4 Because Shem is the eldest son of Noah? Shem was a priest king, Melchizedek his heir, as priest king of Jerusalem. these are all just speculations. Abraham defeated Nimrod and the enemies of his nephew lot. Melchisedek blessed Abraham, I assume for not throwing in with NImrod. Only Eber grandson of Shem and Abraham did not throw in with Nimrod. After the defeat of Nimrod all nations/races were seperated by sin, vernacular language. Shem and the sons of Abraham never race mixed

  • @aburke673 continued;  except half sons who did race mix.

  • continued; the half sons were from Abraham not Shem. I suspect besides Nimrods apostacy against the most high God, Nimrod applied eugenics to race mixing. He is said to have done this to create superior breeds of leopards and tigers to hunt. Modern Eugenics is nothing more than Nimrods attempts to create superior races through modern eugenic sciences. Only the sons of Shem will retain the eternal priesthood of Christ. they have not race mixed nor have they married outside of their faith.

  • continued; Ireland Portugal, parts of Spain were the sons of Shem are located will not lose the faith. I dont subscribe to the speculative Idea/heresy, Christ is Melchisidek because Christ is consubstantial incarnate born of the virgin Mary.

  • continued; if you think about it, the bible is saying Lots incestous sex with his daughters to carry on his lineage, is better than Nimrods apostasy and race mixing for eugenics. Abraham defended his nephew Lot, defeated his enemies than tithed to Melchisedech. God destroyed the giants for being a reprobate seedline.

  • @aburke673 (part 2) Analyze this please'.

    Hebrews 7:3Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the SON OF GOD; abideth a priest continually. 4Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils.

    (continue)

  • @killdevilz4 I will have to get out my saint Jeromes scriptural commentary and study it and get back to you. All I know is whatever opinion comes from Saint Jerome, will not contradict the unanimous consent of all the church fathers safeguarded by the churches 3 charisms of infalliblity. It will not contradict the 4 creeds of the church; apostles creed, Saint Athanasian creed, Nicene Creed, council of Trent with the words of Vatican 1 added. Will make a study and get back to you.

  • @aburke673 Hebrews 6:20...Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. Hebrews 7:1For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;

    [Who is the King of Righteousness?? Who is the King of Peace???]

    (continue)

  • @aburke673 Hebrews 6:20...Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. Hebrews 7:1For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;

    [Who is the King of Righteousness?? Who is the King of Peace???]

    (continue)

  • @aburke673 Hebrews 6:20...Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. Hebrews 7:1For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;

    [Who is the King of Righteousness?? Who is the King of Peace???]

    (continue)

  • @killdevilz4 the king of peace and rightousness in the old testament is Melchsidech who is from Shem's lineage. Only the sons of Shem specifically the grandson of Shem named Eber, refused to take part in Nimrods apostacy. Japeth's sons went to Indo asia, indo europe and later were Scythians who invaded Scotland and Ireland; the Tribe of Danu. the ring of power; occording to the occult, was held by several Scythian kings who worshipped a pagan cult/Dyonisus, Danu, known as the Danaan.

  • continued; the Danaan became Egyptian pharoahs in my opinion and mixed with Hams sons who became later Egyptian pharoahs. These Danaan were in my opinion the tribe of Danaan in Ireland. There is a good chance Ghengis Khan was from this Scythian lineage of Danaan kings. Abraham is from Shem, but Abraham had half sons and only Jacobs descendants who did not intermingle with the sons of Japeth, who were the Danaan pharoahs intermingled with Hamites cursed with the curse of canaan became Israel

  • @aburke673 Let me ask you a question, five me your honest interpritation of these verses..

    (John 8:56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

    57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I AM.)

    [keep in mind I AM is God's holy name]

    Jesus=I AM SAVIOR.. I AM THE WAY.. I AM THE TRUTH.. I AM THE LIGHT.. I AM THE WORD OF GOD..I AM THAT

  • @killdevilz4 Christ is consubstantial incarnate born of the blessed virgin Mary. If he wasnt he would be no eternal mediator between God and man. He would be a farce and a lie of satan. He is consubstantial incarnate born of the virgin Mary. He raised himself up in the high order of Melcisedech an eternal priesthood without sin. He is a priest and king which heretic protest-ants deny based on their apostacy of religous liberty for non catholics

  • @killdevilz4 John 8::5-6, Abraham sang a liturgical song of praise to Christ about Melchisidech and to his heir Christ, in whom Melchisidech prefigures Christ in the old testament.

  • @aburke673 (part 3) Hebrews 7:5And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham:6But he whose descent is not counted from them received tithes of Abraham, and blessed him that had the promises.

    (continue)

  • @killdevilz4 Shem is not Abrahams decendant.

  • @aburke673 Im sorry but what does Shem has to do with Melchizedek? Am I missing anything? *(Heb. 7:3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the SON OF GOD;)

  • @killdevilz4 Melchisedech must be from Shems lineage.

  • @aburke673 If its not in The Word of God i disagree.

  • @killdevilz4 the word of God is catholic so it can not contradict our infallible dogmas; the unanimous consent of all the church fathers safeguarded by the churches 3 charisms of infallibility. we wrote the scriptures along with all the sacred apostolic liturgies. truth can not contradict truth; our catholic scriptures. that is a vain argument.

  • @killdevilz4 Abraham was from Ur.  But at a later date, so were the sephardic jews who intermarried with Hams sons from cursed be Canaan. I dont read any heretical knock offs of the latin vulgate, translated from the east by saint Jerome. James I was a freemason serpent seed sumarian death culter from Ur, who took out the 7 books dropped by Herods kin because of the messianic prophecies to destroy edom who became canaan, and canaan. canaan became the amorites and others.

  • In short the heretical canaanite sumerian KVC should be burnt as heresy, along with James I.

  • @aburke673 So what your saying is that John 8:56-58 reads different on your bible?

    And second, can you please provide documentation chapter and verse in the BIBLE that proves that Melchizedek was from Shem.

    And if you can't its ok hun :).. like you said "Melchisedech MUST be from Shems lineage"... meaning your NOT very sure. Well the Word of God is sufficient you dont need no other source to find the truth.

    Chapter by chapter and verse by verse is the way God's elect study.

  • @killdevilz4 I will tell you what I am sure the bible is stating; that Melchisedech is not of Abrahams lineage but the reverse is true. Abraham is of the lineage of Melchisedech. Abraham is from Ur, a Mesopatamian city state, the sumerian luciferian brotherhood claim was ruled by Tubal Cain, a 7th generation decendant of Cain according to them using extra biblical sources. This means to me the sepharidic from Syrian, who much later setled in Ur, try to make their lineage older than Abraham

  • continued; The bible is telling us Shem is Noahs oldest son, unlike the modern canaanite Jews, who claim it is Ham, because they are from Hams loins. The bible is telling us Shem is the oldest son of Noah, and Melchisedech proceeds Abraham. The bible tells us only Shem and the lineage of Eber is rightous because only Eber refused to participate in the sins of Nimrod. Abraham is from Shem and Ebers lineage and Melchisidech proceeds Abraham/is not from his loins but is from Shem and Eber.

  • continued; the ashkenazi are not from Shems loins at all. The ashkenazi are from the loins of JAPETH. The ashkenazi so called modern jews behind secular zionism, are FROM JAPETH, NOT ABRAHAM. The only way the ashkenazi can trace their lineage back to Abraham is through ESAU EDOM IDUMEA ABSORBED INTO CANAAN, AND THE TRIBE OF DAN, who bred themselves out of the book of life. Sepharidic are from Abraham but went to Syria and breed with the Hamites/Canaanites because Ham is the son of Canaan.

  • The bible is assuring us of purity rightousness of the lineage of Shem, Eber, Melchisedech, Abraham, who is not the father of Melchisedech. the bible is also telling us Abraham sided rightly with Lot, because it was more rightous for Lot to save his bloodline through incestous sex, than the other tribes who participated in Nimrods apostacy. Protestants deny the priesthood of Melchisidech whom is biblically proclaimed as priest king forever/ they deny Christ raised himself up in this lineage

  • Since the biblical punishment FOR participating in NIMRODS SINS IS VERNACULAR LANGUAGE, WHY DO PROTESTANTS DEMAND THE SACRED SCRIPTURES BE PRINTED ONLY IN VERNACULAR, LIKE BIBLICAL BABEL. WHY DO THEY DENY THE ONLY WAY TO BECOME ADOPTED SONS OF THE RIGHTOUS LINEAGE IS THROUGH THE PRIESTHOOD OF SHEM/CHRIST, A PRIEST/KING OF JERUSALEM FOREVER. WHY DO PROTESTANTS USE A HERETICAL CANAANITE KNOCK OFF OF THE LATIN VULGATE THAT DROPS THE SAME BOOKS OF THE CATHOLIC BIBLE AS HERODS BLOODLINES?

  • Herods bloodlines formed freemasonry/ dropped 7 books of the bible that contain messianic prophecies. Especially the biblical destruction of EDOM ABSORBED INTO CANAAN/ DESTRUCTION OF CANAAN AT CONSUMATION/ JUDGEMENT? A catholic studies the scriptures and NEVER uses gnosticism to claim to be filled with the holy ghost to claim to interpret truth against truth/the written scriptures against the unanimous consent of all the church fathers safeguarded by the churches 3 charisms of infalliblity.

  • Saint Jerome and the unanimous consent of all the church fathers is good enough for me, when reading catholic scriptures.

    I do look at sciences that validate scriptures...Science cant explain every mystery.

  • @killdevilz4 Shem is the first born of Noah, his heir and first born son. Melchisidech prefigures Christ who will come in his own name and raise himself up in the high order of Melchisidech who is a priestking of Jerusalem forever without end. to say Melchisidech is Crhist is heretical since Christ is born of the virgin Mary. Please dont tell me you deny Christ is born of the virgin Mary consubstantial incarnate>

  • @killdevilz4 this is a liturigical hymn and allegory about hebrew tradition; the sons name is greater than the fathers, but what belongs to the father belongs to the son and what belongs to the son belongs to the father.

  • @aburke673 I always wondered if Genghis Khan lineage is from the Serpent seed? The reason i ask is because i remember my bible teacher once mentioned "Khan" has the same meaning of "Ken" translation english is "Cain".. So was Genghis a Kenite?

  • @killdevilz4 I dont know. I suspect he was from Japeth. I am trying to make an association between Khan and the tall white China mummies who built pyramids in China and were found with multiple scottish artifacts. I think he was a scythian king or Thracian King from Troy. Historians consider the thracians and scythians to be inseperable. I suspect they are from the same group who became the tautha danaan in Ireland. Khan supported the uyghers in China.

  • @killdevilz4 could you do me a favor and check out what I study when I speak about the saint Jerome scriptural commentary? It is scriptural.

  • the serpent seed was killed in the biblical flood because it was a reprobate seedline. somehow it continued post flood in a small remnant. the serpent seedline becomes canaan post flood. I dont have any way to verify if Khan had canaanite blood.. Anthropoligists believe thracians went to Sumeria and Egypt and brought technologies. supposedly Paris hid Helen of Troy in Egypt. Menelous was edomite and this makes sense for Paris, if the early pharoahs were thracians sons of tiras like the trojans

  • @killdevilz4 do you agree the serpent seedline was killed by the biblical flood except for a small remnant? do you believe this remnant became Canaan, and this is why Aaron, Moses Joshua, King David, attacked the canaanites for anceint Israel? King Solomon subjugated them to hard labor but allowed the danites intermarried into the Canaanites to become the phoenicians from Tyre. Dan was written out of the book of life for intermarrying into Canaan and this is one of the secrets of freemasonry

  • @aburke673 Actually i believe the offspring of Cain wasnt tottally wiped out. Yes a remnant survived. The reason i believe this is because The Word of God mentions it. The Prophecy of Genesis 3:15 (bruise his heel.) needed to be fullfilled. [Serpent seed nailed Christ heels to the cross] It was a Roman death sentence but the ones that accused him were so-called "jews". Like Jesus called them in Matthew 23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers,.. Serpent seed!

    Kenites still well alive today!

  • @killdevilz4 I think there is ample evidence both Thracians and Scythian nobles became ancient pharoahs, intermarried into the hamite line. Do you agree? If so they could have married into the Hamites, cursed with the curse of Canaan. I believe the Canaanites carried a remnant of the giants reprobate seedline. If the scythians intermarried into the Hamite pharoahs, then it is possible Khan was a remnant of serpent seedline from CURSED BE CANAAN, through Ham Canaan's son.

  • whoops; through Canaan, HAM'S SON.

  • @killdevilz4 I think it is possible he/KHAN, was of scythian/JAPETH nobility, hamite lineage/ therefore canaan, if it can somehow be proven his is related to the tautha danaan, and the scythian noble who married the daughter of Pharoah named SCOTA. I dobt it is a coincedence the scythian noble married pharoahs daughter named SCOTA AND SCOTLAND IS CALLED SCOTA'S LAND

  • @aburke673 My bible teacher mentioned "Scota" before it's funny you brought that up. Don't ask me to document this in the Word, my bible teacher said is not biblical but is history.. When King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon took Jerusalem and killed the sons of Zedekiah and eventually dragged Zedekiah to Babylon.. while all of this was happening Jeremiah took the daughters of Zedekiah and fled with them to Egypt. One of the daughters of Zedekiah name was "Scota". From Egypt they went to Scotland.

  • @killdevilz4 there is also a legend Scotia's tomb is in Ireland. Also do you believe Cains remnant is in the remnant of the giants?

  • @aburke673 Sorry i took so long to answer your question. Do i believe Cain's remnant is a remnant of the giants? My opinion.. Kenites were a Canaanitish people, but NOT from Ham's son Canaan. Kenites are Satans blood children (Matt.13:38,39)

    Even Freemasonry claims Cain as Satan's son. And it's these Sons of Cain that established the Satanic roots of Freemasonry.. NOT "Canaanites",NOT"Edomites",NOT "the tribe of DAN".

    But none other than the "Synagogue of Satan" aka Zionist Quadrillionaires!

  • @killdevilz4 that's okay. glad to hear back form you now.

  • @aburke673 (part 2) The Kenites were always merchants and blacksmiths. As you may know the definition of Kenite is "Smith". Kenites were amongst the first to manufacture weapons (Genesis 4:22..Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron:). They were also known from the begining of the bible to commit murder. And they were also the first known to build cities. They were highly intelligent.

    (continue)

  • @killdevilz4 I have read this opinion and I believe they consider themselves Kenites. Did you know Khazars are related to the Turkish Uyghers in China? They are related by blood DNA. they are also related by blood to central asian scythians. PIcts were ancient asian scythians with R1a blood DNA. R1a originated around Khazakstan. It is found in high percentages in Norway. R1a matches the Altai people and the uyghers. Khazars are part of the Ashina military clan that originated in Afghanistan

  • continued; G2c blood DNA originated from the Pashtans in Afghanistan. This blood line is related to the Uyghers as well. Some believe this bloodline followed the silk trade route from Afghanistan to China. They became a ruling noble class in China until they were pushed out of Central asia. Some were pushed up into the Altay mountains. From the Altay mountains some were pushed into Siberia where they picked up the Q blood line DNA. They have the R1B bloodline of a Japeth.

  • continued; Their own kings writings tell us they believed they were of the line of Japeth, Gomer, Togermah. the R1B bloodline originated in Armenia. I believe from Japeth when the ark came to rest a top a mountain in Armenia. This bloodline went up the Danube into southern Germany. It is related to the blood DNA found in northern Mesopatamia and Assyria where the 10 tribes of Issrael were scattered. This doesnt mean they were the 10 tribes. Japeth's line had the same blood as his brother Shem

  • Continued; the R1B bloodline is most prevelant in Western Europe; Ireland, Scotland, Western France, Portugal Spain for example. If they had this occult serpent seedline belief it must have come from northern Mesopatamia, Assyria or Afghanistan. Some of them believe they are from the phoenicians who claim to have been from Neandrathal and walked out of Africa 30000 years ago.

  • continued; the ruling class of Khazars were Turkish, scythian shamans. they were phallic worshippers and their scythian kings had a vampire cult. they claimed to convert to talmudic pharisism around the 7th century a.d. because they ruled by right of blood and they liked talmudic "chosen" peoples laws. they claimed to be from the Simeon levites which is nonsense and from the scattered 10 tribes of Israel. they also claim to be phoenicians who absorbed the tribes of Dan Ishtur and 2 others

  • They never claimed to be direct descendants of Shem, Eber, Abraham Jacob and Joseph except through their lies of being from a remnant of Simeons/Judah from Asia minor. they claim to be bloodline descendants of some of the lost 10 tribes. their blood DNA TELLS THE TRUTH. They are not a pure bloodline from Judah, nor are they of only the R1B bloodline from Japeth.

  • Pashtuns are a military clam from Iran/Afghanistan. They went into Turkey. Pashtuns originated 3500 years ago from the Kushites

  • @aburke673 (part 3) Ok now on a scholar perspective (haha im not a scholar but im a student :)).. Ok aburke lets analyze the couple of versus of the Bible that describe Cain so we could have a better understanding on who is his offspring of TODAY. Genesis 4:8-24 should give us a clue on who bare the "mark"(repobrates/unworthy to God), who are the murderers of the righteous, who are the fugitives and a vagabonds in the earth (Jews dont have a country they could call home) they are the fugitives

  • @killdevilz4 Yes. Jews carry the curse of Cain for murdering the prophets sent to them who prophecied the coming of the just one who is Christ and for calling the divine blood of Christ down on their evil heads. Christ cursed Judah to the face and said your house will remain desolate until you see me again; right before the second coming.

  • @aburke673 No. No. No. haha you misunderstood me. I didn't say Kenites were "Judah". Theirs a BIG difference between Judahites and "Jews". I will later inbox you with this article that explains the difference. Let me ask you a question do you think those that murdered Jesus were of the tribe of Judah (Judahites)? Second. do you think those Talmudic Jews of today are descendants of Judah? Or even Shemetic Israelites??

  • @killdevilz4 I understand the difference between Judahites from the tribe of Judah and those sepharidic and ashkenazi with the J DNA from Canaan and the E b1b1 dna of the phoenicians. I also understand the Edomites called themselves Jews. some people think this edomite dna is R1a. the Sanhedrin that did nt include the pharisees had a remnant of Judah. Idumea means edom in the greek. Herods pharisees were edomites, Phoenician, canaanites. Jews of today have the canaanite J dna.

  • continued; this is true of both sephardic and ashkenazi so called jews. both groups have canaanite J DNA. Ashkenazi have E1b1b and E1b1a and E1b1c of the phoenicians. They are not pure blood lineages from the tribes of Judah only like the Macabees, Levites, Simeons, Benjamin, all a part of the overall tribe of Judah. they are not pure decendants of Shem, Eber , Abraham, Jacob, Joseph then the 12 tribes. they may have some of the DNA of the lost tribes that interbred into Canaan like Dan

  • to answer your question yes there was a remnant of Judah in the high priest Caiphas for example. the answer to question 2 is no. todays talmudic jews are not descendants of Judah in any way nor are they pure blood semetic Israelites.

  • modern so called Jews of today may also have hamitic bloodlines.

  • @aburke673 MAYBE ONE OF THE REASONS FOR HATRED FOR WHITES

  • @brendanmichaelpix exactly. we are the greatest race on earth.

  • @killdevilz4 Judahites were from Shem, Eber, Abraham, Jacob, Josepth, the 12 tribes. they followed levitical laws/ Mosiac laws. modern jews have none of the bloodline of the 12 tribes nor do they have the original faith. the Levitical priesthood failed. Even in the time of Christ the sanhedrin were following what Christ called traditions of men. It could be only first temple Judah ism before King Jeroboam made COHENS NOT of LEVITES, but of phoenician baal worshippers is old testament Judah

  • continued; the old testment tells us King Solomons idolatry would be punished, and king Jeroboam made cohens not of the Levites from Aaron, Moses. Todays modern so called cohens have Canaanite J, DNA. 50% of them have the R1a DNA of the khazars. Todays Cohens both sephardic and ashkenzi are CANAANITES AND 50% OF THEM ARE R1a indo asian scythians from the khazar bloodline. parts of the 10 tribes along with parts of the Levites and simeons from Judah were scattered with Israel in 720 b.c.

  • continued; Judah was put into captivity by the babylon assyrians later in the 6th century as punishment for idolatry, when Jeremias hid the ark of the covenant from the phoenicians and canaanite sephardic as well as the babylonian assyrians frm the evil amorites. the Persian king Cyrus allowed the remnant of Judah to go back and build the second temple. It could be argued only first temple Judahism from Aaron and Moses is true Judah ism without the idolatry from king Solomon on.

  • continued; King Solomon failed to attack the phoenicians and Canaaanites of Tyre who absorbed the lost tribe of Dan. He worked with Hiram Abiff king of Tyre, founder of freemasonry. Hirams name for the hebrew God of the temple according to freemasonry is Ja for the hebrew God, Ba for Baal and On for Osirus/lucifer. the remnant of Jews who went into captivity in Assyria and went back under Cyrus the great of Persia, were Judah, but they had picked up the Assyrian idolatry in my opinion.

  • @aburke673 Those that were taken captive by the Assyrian was the 10 northern tribes also known as the "house of Israel". The house of Israel and the house of Judah are split. House of Israel were taken captive by the Assyrian and the house of Judah were taken captive by King of Babylon.

  • @killdevilz4 Yes. Also some of the levites and Simeons from Judah were scattered with the house of Israel. Some of the Levites somehistorians think were scattered to the Cimmerians who became the Sicamber in France, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, parts of Germany.

  • @aburke673 Wow you really know your blood type. Thats something i need to do more research in. But thanks for all the information you share with us. All your videos are very interesting and they also help me out with my research, thanx. I will pray for our heavenly Father to give you more wisdom to continue to enlighten us with that knowledge thats been kept hidden and now its coming out to light.

  • @killdevilz4 thanks very much for your kind remarks. the current so called canaanite jews with phoenician blood lines, are the phallic baal worshippers who usurped the levitical line in the north, when king Jeroboam made false coehns/priests not of the line of the Levites of Aaron and Moses. Edom was absorbed into Canaan. The amorites were absorbed into canaan. Both Sephardic and ashkenazi are of this edom/canaanite bloodline. They have absolutely no bloodline from Shem, Eber, Abraham.

  • @killdevilz4 Yes. Jews are fugutives who must hear the gospel but are never forced to convert to it. They are forced to hear the truth of their blood guilt.

  • @killdevilz4 'The original writings from which this history is translated are believed to have been carried away by Edward I, along with...Jacob's Pillow [the British coronation stone, the Stone of Scone] upon which the Caledonians crowned their kings at Scone Palace' (p. 2). THIS IS WHY ENGLISH MONARCHS ARE CORONATED ON SCOTAS STONE AS ANCIENT EGYPTIAN PHAROAHS

  • @killdevilz4 "Magog was also the progenitor of the Scythians, as well as of numerous other races across Europe and Central Asia." Josephus the ancient historian wrote the father of the scythians was Magog. Magog are of Japeths lineage. There is alot of evidence wherever the thracian/ trojans from Tiras went, the scythians from magog went. I believe Khan was a thracian/trojan or scythian/magog king.

  • @killdevilz4 And the word of God came to me, Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Mosoch and Thubal: and prophesy of him,

    Ezekial 38:1-2

    what do you think these verses mean?

    Could this Tubal be the Tubal Cain of freemasonry? The Tubal Cain of Ur? If so it would possibly mean Scythians intermarried into this serpent seed lineage and breed all over Europe and Asia, correct? Am I off base? I will check out my saint Jerome scriptural commentary.

  • @killdevilz4 And say to him: Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I come against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Mosoch and Thubal. Ezekial 38:3

    What do you think is the meaning of Ezekial 38:1-6?

  • The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tiras.[3]

    Is Ezekial speaking against these sons of Japeth; Tubal, Meshech, and Magog?

  • @killdevilz4 the saint Jeromes scriptural commentay tells us it is hebrew tradition the son INHERITS THE MORE EXCELLENT NAME... In this case the son who inherits the more excellent name is Christ, so Melchisidech father to Christs' priesthood shares in the sons more excellent name. Melchisidech is spoken of with the sons/Christ's more excellent merits as it is tradition for the son to inherit the more excellent name, and the father shares in the sons name and merits.

  • continued, the bible is making it clear; Christ the son in the high order of Melchisedech, existed begotten of the father, consubstantial, without begining and without end.

  • the saint Jeromes scriptural commentary tells us the father created the world IN THE NAME OF THE SON. The sons role is heir to the father, mediator to all creation, the son existed before all creation, before he appeared as man.Through the son the father created the world.Some scholars think Hebrews 7:3-4 contains a liturgical song like the psalms of King David. the author of the hymn describes the son as mediator of creation.and assimilates him to the personified wisdom of the old testament

  • Abraham is singing a liturgical hymn of praise for his defeat of the kings. He is praising the eternal wisdom of Christ personified in the OT priest king of Jerusalem Melchisidech. It is Hebrew tradition the inheriting sons name in this case Christ will be greater than Melchisedech.

  • continued; Abraham is praising Christ for Melchisedech, who is not from Abrahams loins, but is the prefigurement of Christ in the OT..

  • @aburke673 (part 4) Hebrews 7:8And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth. 9And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham. 10For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.

    (continue)

  • @aburke673 (part 5) Hebrews 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

  • @killdevilz4 yes. After King Jeroboam made priests not of the levitical line, God promised a new covenant where Israel is first and Judah is cursed and last... The prophet Jeremias hid the ark of the covenant from the Assyrian/syrian sepharidic and prophecied the new and eternal Israel the catholic church.

  • @killdevilz4 the levitical priesthood failed due to weakness and sin. this is ex cathedra the Council of Trent and saint Paul writes about this dogma; the levitical priesthood failed. the failure of the Levitical priesthood is in my opinion the reason the 10 tribes of Israel were scattered to the gentiles/nations, who already had the priesthood of Shem, Noahs oldest son.

    Abraham's prodgeny had a series of half sons but no such thing is said of Shem and his prodgeny.

  • @aburke673 (part 6) Hebrews 7:13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar. 14For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood. 15And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest, 16Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

  • @killdevilz4 these things are spoken of in the fixed rule canon of the mass in the Tridentine rite.

  • @aburke673

    all pagan systems are based on astrotheology ..which is what the bible is a about..

    the nicean creed just monopolised the accounting systems set up by the pagan systems..

    it runs it till people wake up from their child like state..ie ward of the estate..and claim beneficiary status to the trust..

    why do u think the birth certificate is on bonded papaer ..its a claim tha tur mother set upp .till u claim the accountants run the trust as their personal expense account.

  • @kdcruz75 the Nicean creed is the creed of Holy rome. The germanic Franks converted to the Nicean creed, when King Clovis I received water trinitarian baptism from Saint Remy.

  • @aburke673

    the religious text books are in coded form not to hide ..but to teach the subject at different levels with the same story line..the high preists are not teaching u the code because they dont want u to claim ur birth right ..and work under ur instructions..in the city empire accoun ting suystem

    pagan meams un civilised ..ie not under civil law..

    it s orginal word is pagus ..meaning people outside the city and its law..

    the rtoman empire is civilisation ..under trust law

  • @aburke673

    pagus comes form the word pax:

    A painted, stamped or carved tablet with a representation of Christ or the Virgin Mary, which was kissed by the priest during the Mass ("kiss of peace") and then passed to other officiating clergy and the congregation to be kissed.

    so Rome represents city civilsation ..if u think u are civilsed ur name is of ROME..and teh blood covement..they bring peace only when u wake up form ur child state

  • @kdcruz75 in the bible there are 7 world empires. The 7th is holy rome not pagan Rome. Pagan Rome is the beast, number 6. Pagan Rome of the edomites submitted to the white priesthood of Shem. the priesthood of Shem became holy Rome, the 7th world empire. out of the 7th wolrd empire come 10 popes and then the jewish anti christ numer 11 a complete usurper. He is jew anti pope Paul VI. John XXIII is an anti pope from the French cardinals and french BNAI BRITH

  • @aburke673

    pax also means peace..where do u find peace ..in a villag or a city ( which are jsut pens for human cattle and sheep to extract energy taking us away from our peaceful state..

    like how the native cultres lived..

    if ur not pagan ur still of ROME ..since u want to be under civil law..with ur name property of rome..until you understand ur divine nature .ur soul being not of this earth or world.if u want ur ego to cleave to the world of satan the illsuion.

  • in england the english are called by the bloodline ..caucasian ..ie the eltie describe their subjects/slaves as foreign to the land..being white is notohing special ..it just means a higher credit rating for the trust ur mother created ..and wherre has that got so called whites. they're neck deeop in debt ..supporting the so called civillisation run by the bloodline

    utube : US is East india company

  • @kdcruz75 It is special to me that the Scots can trace their blood line back to Shem and Japeth. They can trace an unbroken lineage back to Judah and to the 10 tribes of Israel scattered to the nations. It is true the basques and berbers are the tribe of Shem. the scots came through Iberia where the basques and celts lived, to Scotland.

  • there is no man or woman on earth who is physically white or black ..

    it is a legal fiction ..and white and black denotes credit rating in this system ..based on voluntary servitude ..through trickery..

    it is based on the stealing of the womb ..matrimoney by the patriarchs who walk around in frocks and night gowns..

    you r name is actually a trust created by ur mother ..the birth certificate is the receipt for the vessel she created ..and it still has the same dimensions and weights

  • @kdcruz75 what? my family is white and I can trace my blood line for 1000 years. moral relativism tries to make every thing including race and religion relative. it isnt.

  • the reason I care about the origin of my white race is because of history. the white race has been discriminated against and our true hisotry hidden from us by the Illuminati summerian brotherhood, who were canaanites

  • why the fk do we give a sht about the origin of whites or even care about race at all? the person who made this video is fked up

  • "Moses was white nationalist separatist." Now I've heard everything! I can die happy.

  • @ideologger Moses removed Israel from all canaanite influences, to form a self ruled state. that is the heart and soul of white nationalism. We have always been for a white celtic self ruled state, loyal to the papacy. Charles de Gualles uncle wrote about this movement. The Saxons are a Summerian death cult based on canaanite lore from Sumer and the city state of Ur..

  • @ideologger Robert the Bruce, 25 Scottish nobles wrote the Scots are an unbroken line of Kings from the 10 tribes of ancient Israel, who traveled through Scythians, Iberia where celts, basques lived. The basques/ berbers are the tribe of Shem. Japeth invaded Ireland and Scotland. Ancient Israel and the stone of destiny came to Scotland from Israel. The ancient Mayans were white berbers who spoke basque. my ancestry is celtic from Shem, Japeth and ancient Israel, both Judah and the 10 tribes

  • @aburke673 Wow- sounds like you're a Nazi Mormon. I guess if you're going to construct a fantasy, you may as well go all out.

  • @ideologger nazi mormon? Nazis worshipped dark energy and the dark sun. Mormons are freemasons. save your specious arguments and slanders for someone who cares.

  • @ideologger race mixing for eugenics purposes is apostacy/the idolatry of man as God. .

  • @ideologger by the way ignoramous; intentional race mixing by the state for eugenics purposes is apostacy.

  • @ideologger people like you never cease to amaze me. this view is based on facts/reality. but far be it from me to confuse a race mixer for eugenic purposes including genocide of the white race with facts. you are an utter apostate

  • The people bad mouthing white nationalism within a catholic construct are the Canaanites whom Moses despised.

  • In the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall devote them to complete destruction, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as the LORD your God has commanded (Deut. 20:16-17).

  • Moses despised the Canaanites because they respected not God's eternal laws.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more