New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson abandoned his nomination to become commerce secretary under pressure of a grand jury investigation into a state contract awarded to his political donors
Well he's the most qualified candidate in either party and has the best plans for Iraq and Global Warming. He has my vote. As for New Mexicans hating him... he was re-elected with 69% of the vote, the highest in New Mexico's history, including 40% of the Republican vote. Go Bill Richardson!
I'm a republican, and let me just say Richardson or Gravel are the only democrats I could consider voting for. I hope you democrats pick someone good - PLEASE NOT OBAMA OR HILLARY :(
I'm a Democrat, and I like Richardson's credentials. He's flubbed a few times, particularly his recent flub on Logo about homosexuality, but it doesn't do much to override his likability and impressive resume (Secretary of Energy, UN Ambassador, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize). With every candidate, you'd probably have to sacrifice some kind of morals since there are barely any candidates you can 100% agree with, and I'm prepared to do that with Richardson.
If you want to look something up, look up 'paranoia' if you honestly think anyone is going to "sell us" to Mexico, whatever THAT means. Richardson has an incredibly strong resumé with foreign affairs and is very popular in New Mexico, and to think that he'd turn us 3rd world, or that ANYONE from either party would turn us 3rd world like that, is paranoid and absurd. And hysterical.
He's not popular with Americans but very supportive of NAU/SPP. I suppose you didn't catch the THIRD meeting of Canada, Mexico and the US last week in Canada. Bush tells the sheeple that NAU is a conspiracy and Calderon goes on to say he feels that the unification of the North American continent is good for all the businessmen involved. As he let's the cat out of the bag, all the lame stream media cuts to the Space shuttle...yeah, I'm totally paranoid. It's a government website, FGS.
Americans barely know him; there is no significant disapproval rating. He is, however, very popular in New Mexico and has supported some great things, for Democrats especially. He has great foreign policy experience and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize four times. There is nothing there that shows he's "giving us up" to Mexicans; it's simply paranoia, the usual kind you see from political youtubers.
Well, I only know a few in NM and they hate him, so who knows. I haven't been impressed by the debates. But then, I'm against open borders and amnesty for law breakers, Universal health care and tax increases...so I guess I'm just paranoid.
He won his term of governor by one of the largest margins in NM's history; the people you know aren't indicative of his popularity there. The rest have nothing to do with "handing us over" to Mexico, and some are untrue. He declared a State of Emergency for the border of NM and also wants to reduce that immigration. It's straight from Ontheissues DOT Org. Yes, you are paranoid, and you've resorted to straw mans to try to derail him.
I'm not doing anything of the kind...I don't KNOW him, like I said...but he IS for amnesty, tax increase and universal health care, per his own admission. He is the most pro illegal of the lot, as well.
Pro-amnesty does not equal handing us over to Mexicans, especially when you consider how much more revenue the gov't can get if these people are taxed for being here. Pro universal health care does not equal being 3rd world. Canada is not 3rd world. Europe is not 3rd world. By saying otherwise, you're not only throwing hyperboles around, but you are also tossing around straw mans, and that's disingenuous.
OMG...talk about putting word's in someone else's mouth!!! WHAT is your problem?
Taxes IF and when they are withheld on minimum wage earners will NEVER ever equate to the social services they use. I, personally, am against universal health care and NEVER equated it to being third world, YOU did. Why do Libs always accuse, rather than debate? Talk about disingenuous.
are you fucking kidding me?? I'm from Mexico and I know for a fact he wont do that, shit his Border is one of the less penetrated out of all the border states, he wants to control the border not because of Illegal Immigration but because of the huge drug traffic going on there the real big problem. fucking bullshit propaganda fuck head.
He hasn't been asked about China yet, but he would deal with that crisis better than any other candidate by far...he negotiated with North Korea as recently as a month ago and succeeded!
Biden is a horrible candidate. He wants to disarm the law-abiding and give criminals free reign via gun control laws, and impliment all manner of socialist programs.
I like this guy too. I would trust him to take on immigration issues, I mean, the guy is the gov of a border state, and he's multicultural. I think if anyone can address the issue, he can!!!
Richardson was Sec. of Energy. That's the department that manages nuclear weapons. Wouldn't it be nice if when we negotiate with Iran and North Korea, the president actually knows something about nuclear weapons. It matters. there's a big difference between the two types, plutonium and U-235. Going the U-235 route, like Iran, they can only get, at most, a few bombs. Plutonium can be made by the ton. Meanwhile G W Bush can't even say `nuclear weapon' -- it always comes out ``NUCULAR''.
It would help if these commentators brough a little honesty and perspective to these debates on Pakistan's role in the "War on Terror". The Taliban / Al-Qaeda types in the area are the same religious warriors that Reagan proudly referred to as "Freedom Fighters" when they were fighting the Soviets. The CIA armed and funded these groups and created this problem FOR Pakistan, and now they want to pressure the Pakistani government for "not doing enough"? Give me a break.
Exactly! The democratically elected, American-educated Pakistani President Bhutto warned Reagan about arming the religious fanatics known as the mujahadeen. Now Pakistan is a military dictatorship with nuclear weapons and Bush supports them. Iraq was invaded for "maybe" having WMDs, but Pakistan "definitely" has them & contains more extremists & is our ally? It makes no sense.
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson abandoned his nomination to become commerce secretary under pressure of a grand jury investigation into a state contract awarded to his political donors
typical democrat
wiferachel 3 years ago
Bill Richardson practices
ritual child sacrifice with Bush and other elite scumbags: watch video =4CqMY96RvP8&feature=related
tf8252 4 years ago
Well he's the most qualified candidate in either party and has the best plans for Iraq and Global Warming. He has my vote. As for New Mexicans hating him... he was re-elected with 69% of the vote, the highest in New Mexico's history, including 40% of the Republican vote. Go Bill Richardson!
MitchHuber 4 years ago 2
I'm a republican, and let me just say Richardson or Gravel are the only democrats I could consider voting for. I hope you democrats pick someone good - PLEASE NOT OBAMA OR HILLARY :(
ChampionofLiberty 4 years ago
I'm a Democrat, and I like Richardson's credentials. He's flubbed a few times, particularly his recent flub on Logo about homosexuality, but it doesn't do much to override his likability and impressive resume (Secretary of Energy, UN Ambassador, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize). With every candidate, you'd probably have to sacrifice some kind of morals since there are barely any candidates you can 100% agree with, and I'm prepared to do that with Richardson.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
Richardson would turn the US into a 3rd World cesspool so fast, your head would spin!
3Haydens 4 years ago
lol, sure. Even the worst presidents in history didn't cripple the US like that. Please.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
Yeah, Richardson would proudly be the first to turn America over to his beloved Mexico, and Mexico would pay him VERY well to do it.
3Haydens 4 years ago
lmao. Okay, thanks for the laugh.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
Look up NAU/SPP.
3Haydens 4 years ago
If you want to look something up, look up 'paranoia' if you honestly think anyone is going to "sell us" to Mexico, whatever THAT means. Richardson has an incredibly strong resumé with foreign affairs and is very popular in New Mexico, and to think that he'd turn us 3rd world, or that ANYONE from either party would turn us 3rd world like that, is paranoid and absurd. And hysterical.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
He's not popular with Americans but very supportive of NAU/SPP. I suppose you didn't catch the THIRD meeting of Canada, Mexico and the US last week in Canada. Bush tells the sheeple that NAU is a conspiracy and Calderon goes on to say he feels that the unification of the North American continent is good for all the businessmen involved. As he let's the cat out of the bag, all the lame stream media cuts to the Space shuttle...yeah, I'm totally paranoid. It's a government website, FGS.
3Haydens 4 years ago
Americans barely know him; there is no significant disapproval rating. He is, however, very popular in New Mexico and has supported some great things, for Democrats especially. He has great foreign policy experience and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize four times. There is nothing there that shows he's "giving us up" to Mexicans; it's simply paranoia, the usual kind you see from political youtubers.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
Well, I only know a few in NM and they hate him, so who knows. I haven't been impressed by the debates. But then, I'm against open borders and amnesty for law breakers, Universal health care and tax increases...so I guess I'm just paranoid.
3Haydens 4 years ago
He won his term of governor by one of the largest margins in NM's history; the people you know aren't indicative of his popularity there. The rest have nothing to do with "handing us over" to Mexico, and some are untrue. He declared a State of Emergency for the border of NM and also wants to reduce that immigration. It's straight from Ontheissues DOT Org. Yes, you are paranoid, and you've resorted to straw mans to try to derail him.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
I'm not doing anything of the kind...I don't KNOW him, like I said...but he IS for amnesty, tax increase and universal health care, per his own admission. He is the most pro illegal of the lot, as well.
3Haydens 4 years ago
Pro-amnesty does not equal handing us over to Mexicans, especially when you consider how much more revenue the gov't can get if these people are taxed for being here. Pro universal health care does not equal being 3rd world. Canada is not 3rd world. Europe is not 3rd world. By saying otherwise, you're not only throwing hyperboles around, but you are also tossing around straw mans, and that's disingenuous.
Frightwolf 4 years ago
OMG...talk about putting word's in someone else's mouth!!! WHAT is your problem?
Taxes IF and when they are withheld on minimum wage earners will NEVER ever equate to the social services they use. I, personally, am against universal health care and NEVER equated it to being third world, YOU did. Why do Libs always accuse, rather than debate? Talk about disingenuous.
3Haydens 4 years ago
Well retard it is good for business, yet its not good for USA pride, shit is not even good for Mexican pride either.
gallomex13 4 years ago
Really...look up NAU/SPP...what? are YOU too paranoid to inform yourself? Look it up, read up, see where Richardson, et al stand on the issue.
3Haydens 4 years ago
are you fucking kidding me?? I'm from Mexico and I know for a fact he wont do that, shit his Border is one of the less penetrated out of all the border states, he wants to control the border not because of Illegal Immigration but because of the huge drug traffic going on there the real big problem. fucking bullshit propaganda fuck head.
gallomex13 4 years ago
He hasn't been asked about China yet, but he would deal with that crisis better than any other candidate by far...he negotiated with North Korea as recently as a month ago and succeeded!
skirandour 4 years ago
Biden/Richardson 08" VOTE Damn it! we have a better voting democracy in most of the world!
revisneb 4 years ago
Biden is a horrible candidate. He wants to disarm the law-abiding and give criminals free reign via gun control laws, and impliment all manner of socialist programs.
ChampionofLiberty 4 years ago
I like this guy allot, my problem as with everyone(all candidates) is immigration.
waveslider11 4 years ago
I like this guy too. I would trust him to take on immigration issues, I mean, the guy is the gov of a border state, and he's multicultural. I think if anyone can address the issue, he can!!!
mydogdavidbowie 4 years ago
who the fuck you are to replace a leader in another country, stop being police of the world, or you be vanished.
an1792 4 years ago
This guy is a fantastic candidate. Richardson/Biden 08
halvor311 4 years ago
I'd be happier with Richardson/Anybodyelse 08
grupolavolta 4 years ago
I can one up you: Obama/Richardson: Smiles and Smarts
judaoist 4 years ago
Richardson was Sec. of Energy. That's the department that manages nuclear weapons. Wouldn't it be nice if when we negotiate with Iran and North Korea, the president actually knows something about nuclear weapons. It matters. there's a big difference between the two types, plutonium and U-235. Going the U-235 route, like Iran, they can only get, at most, a few bombs. Plutonium can be made by the ton. Meanwhile G W Bush can't even say `nuclear weapon' -- it always comes out ``NUCULAR''.
charlie6997 4 years ago
It would help if these commentators brough a little honesty and perspective to these debates on Pakistan's role in the "War on Terror". The Taliban / Al-Qaeda types in the area are the same religious warriors that Reagan proudly referred to as "Freedom Fighters" when they were fighting the Soviets. The CIA armed and funded these groups and created this problem FOR Pakistan, and now they want to pressure the Pakistani government for "not doing enough"? Give me a break.
zulfishah 4 years ago
Exactly! The democratically elected, American-educated Pakistani President Bhutto warned Reagan about arming the religious fanatics known as the mujahadeen. Now Pakistan is a military dictatorship with nuclear weapons and Bush supports them. Iraq was invaded for "maybe" having WMDs, but Pakistan "definitely" has them & contains more extremists & is our ally? It makes no sense.
amurrica 4 years ago