For those of you that belive in Darlie's innocence, please visit and help her with your comments and more on Facebook "Free Darlie Routier". This site was set up by a friend of mine trying to help free her from this nightmare of unjust police and media work. Let's do what we can to get this woman some long over due justice. There are other supportive sites there as well. God bless us all and help out justice system protect the innocent regardless of there peraonal problems.
Yeah because some random dude is going to randomly come to your house, kill your two boys while you sopposely sleep threw it and he only gives you a few cuts and stabs and leaves the knife and runs? It astounds me that these evil mothers continue to lie about it no matter what evidence you throw at them.. But hey i guess it worked for Casey Anthony.
Note: sociopath with heavy narsistic traits...she names her kids devon damon and drake. Notices all the ds (narcissm). Also, all heavy devil like names..bitch has as much conscience as a can of silly string
the motive is age old...money. She was going to get $5,000 apiece for both kids from insurance policies (according to Hush Little Babies by Don Davis)
Hair on the screen??? She lived in the house! The dust on the sill was not disturbed because one does not have to touch a window sill that is that low to step through.
@LuckyBlueEyez The hair on the screen was tested and was not Darlie's. You may not have to touch the window going out of it - with no screen. Look at the narrow, cluttered pathway, the T-cut in the screen. Blood on the utility room door actually dripped down the door it was so heavy with blood. How did this "intruder" get through that screen with so much blood on him and get none on the screen or window?
@2hereagain One question that lingers in my mind. What was her motive? The murder was over kill. I somewhat believe that there was someone there who had rape in mind and had to get rid of the children that were there first. Maybe a secret stalker...but this murder is not what a mother like Darlie would have done. I just don't see where this makes any sense at all. Who knows, maybe the killer will admit this crime in the future. Hopefully before she is put to death.
@LuckyBlueEyez Motive... who knows why people do these things? Makes no sense on any level. A rapist would have used her children to make her submit to him. The attack on the children was personal and they were the intended targets. Alan Brantley of the FBI said that the children were killed by someone that knew them & knew them well. Darlie is the killer and she will never admit to what she's done.
@2hereagain No one knows that a rapist would have used the kids to make her submit. I don't believe that. That is not even an educated guess. A rapist would want to eliminate anyone else but the one he was targeting. That is my opinion. As for the FBI....they are not God! Their opinion is heresay and only speculation. They will always side with the police and believe me ...there are crooked cops!
lol... Sounds like you've had a bit of trouble with the law...
That doesn't change the facts of the case or the evidence against her, though. There was no rape, no rapist, no intruder. Darlie Routier murdered her children as they slept at her feet.
@LuckyBlueEyez "No one knows that a rapist would have used the kids to make her submit. I don't believe that. That is not even an educated guess."
No, it's not an educated guess, it's a statistical fact.
If a man comes in to rape a woman & there are children present, MORE LIKELY THAN NOT, the rapist will use the children to make the woman submit. If he kills her children first, she would go nuts on him & submit to nothing. Don't believe it. That's your choice but it won't change the facts.
@LuckyBlueEyez Ok... well, with that probability as well as the 97% probability that this was done by a parent and considering the blood evidence, her inconsistent stories and injuries... Yep... she did it.
Ignore 2hereagains comments, he or she is an evil person that makes Devon and Damon Routier roll over in their graves calling their mother a killer. I am going to go to 2hereagains house and stab him or her to death and show him or her what life threatening wounds are because all those forensic shows about the Routier case and the police have brainwashed the person into thinking Darlie is guilty. The real killer could confess and be arrested someday and 2hereagain would still be saying Darlie
@realityandgameshow The evidence against her is overwhelming. Darlie Routier killed her kids and now she has to pay for it. It has nothing to do with me.
@2hereagain Only a retard would think that Darlie killed her kids and only a dumb person would think that Darlie killed her kids and that makes you a dumb retard because you believe Darlie killed her kids.
@2hereagain It is not overwhelming, the police just put the clothes from the kids bodies in bags from albertsons and the blood evidence is contaminated. The police work is shotty and when Darlie goes free and the real killer is put behind bars you will realize that Darlie is innocent and you will also realize what a retard you are.
@realityandgameshow The blood evidence was not contaminated and the kids clothes weren't bagged up. Damon went to the hospital in what he had on at the time, Devon's body was left at the scene with what he had on.
Darlie will never go free. The only way for that to happen would be if they can prove that an intruder was in the house, which is not possible because there was no intruder.
@realityandgameshow That is why the police want to throw all on her and be done with the case as they always do. It's easier for them to close the books and take credit. Hide their mistakes by throwing the scent off of their trail. So many people are wrongly accused and spend their lives behind bars because of shoddy police work.
All these so-called experts wanna analyze every PAID detail of a persons crime while they're on trial! It's alot easier sometimes just to see someone for who they really are.It's in our DNA,for us to be able to know when we're being deceived.All these LAWS protecting criminals,makes you forget why they were a criminal! Lawyers get so caught up in the Political correctness that they forget about the NATURE of the ACCUSED,and what they've done! You'll see lawyers having a laugh with their clients
@JuJuMJFan4life If you were paying attention to the Darlie Routier segment of American Justice you would realize that Darlie's husband said he does not believe she slept through the attack that when the intruder knocked her unconscious she says she woke up.
@realityandgameshow Go to her first interview from prison in 1997 and you'll hear Darlie say the same thing... what's your point? She says she has no memory of what happened, by the way.
@2hereagain Tramatic experiences tend to alter memory and details are not processed correctly. Bits and pieces come back at times but the ordeal is not memorized with precision. One can do their best to recall but confusion and mixed thoughts intersect along with horrible scenes that play out in thoughts of what you saw.
@Godzillaman The baby was upstairs with Darin, the boys were downstairs with her. Darlie's little sister Dana came home with Darin that night, had dinner with them, Darin took her home. Darlie & Darin had a huge fight that night, which they denied in the beginning but eventually admitted to. There was considerable gossip about infidelity on both sides. She was mentally unstable & losing all that was dear to her. (con't)
@Godzillaman (con't) I think that she snapped. I think whatever they argued about that night made her so angry that all she could think about was revenge.
The 'Darlie Routier is Guilty' page and the 'Justice For Darlie' page. Maybe a couple of others as well. Just search her name and they'll all pop up..
I wonder how Robert Stack felt narrating and presenting some of these stories. Like, for some of them, he must've known the alternate scenario was bullshit but he had to tell the story. Heavy.
@Stara3181967 Your minds eye? ha ha ha lol and OMG... are you really serious??? Um, I don't think I'm gonna talk to you anymore. It seems like you really do have some kind of mental issues.
I thought about all possibilities and for an intruder to eliminate the kids as any witnesses, he would have to kill them. It is also possible that this was not a robbery but rather an attemped rape gone bad. That could be the reason for nothing taken. When everything got out of hand, the intruder freaked and fled. As for Darlie not feeling anything or hearing anything, this could be due to having some liquor the night before. It may have knocked her out, and the reason behind felling grogy.
@LuckyBlueEyez An intruder slaughters two sleeping children but leaves the only witness who could identify him alive? It is more likely than not that an intruder hell-bent on raping her would have used her children to get her to submit to him, not kill them first thing. It should be obvious to anyone that the children were the intended targets. Darlie's toxicology test came back clean, except for the prescription diet pills she was taking. No alcohol or drugs in her system.
The sock could have been what the intruder picked up in the house to hind any fingerprints. Then when he left while running away, he could have taken the sock off of his hand.
the difference and similarities between the casey anthony case and the darlie routier case is extremely bothersome. darlie was convicted because she was pretty, and for the way she acted. casey was ACQUITTED because she is pretty and the jury IGNORED the WAY SHE ACTED. i wonder what would have happened if casey anthony was treated the way darlie routier was. at least darlie showed emotion over her dead children. casey anthony, you suck.
It's Texas, tunnel vison, she did not do this. Babies dies, it;s easy to say it was the mother. She ran and through a tube sock blocks away to throw off the investigation? Texas is out of their minds. The real killer is free. What a messed up justice system.
@1965JLO Darlie Routier murdered her children. The sock was found 3 houses down, not "blocks" away. It's never easy to say the mother is the murderer, but strong forensic evidence says it was. The real killer is Darlie and she is right where she belongs.
@TheMedievalMan The silly string was a tradition. Even though the children were gone, she could still celebrate a birthday. I don't think she had come to terms with them being gone. She wanted to do something for the birthday and felt good about being close to them. Like she was still with them. This made her feel good and she just didn't want to think of them as gone. She was trying to avoid reality because in reality, they were dead. She would rather feel like time was being shared with them.
@LuckyBlueEyez "The silly string was a tradition" It was "inappropriate" for them to spray the silly string and Darlie's upcoming vow renewal that August, but perfectly appropriate for for it to be sprayed over the boys graves a week after they were murdered. I know that people do tacky things and that doesn't make them a murderer, it's just disturbing.
She was not forced to slep downstairs. That is an assumption, not fact. You weren't there. There was no blood on the sock because she did not have the sock in her possesion. There was plenty of blood in the house and more than enough of hers to get on everything. Maybe this happened, and maybe that happened. Stara, you could make up over 2 dozens scanarios but lacking evidence, Many that would make a great fiction movie if you could think of everything to make it sound more interesting to view.
@LuckyBlueEyez Okay... I dont know why you are telling me all of this. All I said was I am going to honor her with some silly string... you know, the same way she did with her sons.
@2hereagain I don't automatically think that just because Darlie is a mother that she couldn't murder her children because I know Susan Smith murdered her children, and what about Baby Grace whose body was in a box from walmart, I believe her mother Kimberly was responsible, what about Andrea Yates, I don't believe she is innocent of drowning her kids in the bathtub, when I hear about new murder cases of mothers murdering their children, I don't always think they are innocent but Darlie is.
jurors were never shown the pictures of darlie's body after her attack. she is so very bruised, obviously beaten....this alone should allow for a retrial. she is innocent and is being judged on the 'silly string' incident, which is absurd. again, the jury was not shown the entire tape of the memorial service, or how upset the family was. show ALL the evidence, especially in a death penalty trial....
@laceydays1 The pictures of Darlie's injuries were show to the jury. On Darlie's own support site is a list of evidence offered by both the state & defense. Trial transcripts/testimony reflect that the photos were shown and argued. They were a strong point of her defense. She was not judged on the SS tape. There was strong forensic evidence that pointed to no one but Routier.
@laceydays1 It was Routier's own attorney who chose not to show the memorial service tape... why do you think her own attorney wouldn't show a tape of her supposedly grieving when he knew that the state was showing the SS tape which shows her very obviously NOT grieving?
@laceydays1 "jurors were never shown the pictures of darlie's body after her attack. she is so very bruised, obviously beaten....this alone should allow for a retrial."
That would be a good reason for a new trial, if it were true. But it's not. The photo's of what injuries she did have were shown. And her "body" wasn't bruised, the underside of her arms were. Pretty strange for someone who went through this terrible beating not to have bruising anywhere else except the underside of her arms.
@2hereagain the bruises on her arms could have been left when one of her sons was kicking at the person who was attacking him. They did mention that one of them had bruises on his heels.
@hopefloats57 I agree. It was her oldest son Devon that was bruised and he was laying face up when she attacked him. So he probably gave her a fight. Bless his heart, poor babies. It makes me sick for them. I think she 'enhanced' her bruises also.
A majority of these things you are posting have already been back to court and ruled on, cowgirl! The blood in the garage not being tested, this was testified to in court, it was NOT blood, yet they keep telling that lie, because they know not everyone who reads it will check it out. Lies are the only way they can get/keep supporters. Like so many other of their lies, all you have to do is take what they say and back it up with the facts. Or you can stay blind to them. It's your choice.
@DantesBbyGrl07 How have you backed up one word you've said? You haven't. You have gone to Routiers website & taken everything they've said as the truth without taking even a moment to research a word of it. They depend on you & others like you for support. People who will go no further than her support sites & believe she was wronged. I can back up everything I say, but you are so afraid of hearing the truth that you've blocked me from sending you messages. You dont want to hear the truth.
@2hereagain Actually, No I haven't. You yourself have stated that the Transcript contained over 33,000 errors yet you keep trying to shove it down my throat. I won't believe anything in the transcript till the courts admit they flubbed up. Here's the deal sweetie, You have your OPINION and I have mine. Leave it at that.
@DantesBbyGrl07 So you're also saying that the the courts never admitted the transcripts were flawed, they were never corrected, and the ones that DARLIES SUPPORTERS have posted on DARLIES SUPPORT sites aren't valid or correct?
@2hereagain Duh, that's why I don't believe half of what I have seen on it. Of course her mom and husband are going to back her up and swear she's 100% innocent. That's why I have said another trail is in order and a possible life sentence, You HAVE to admit that much. I don't like killers in general, We have a former Ind state trooper convicted TWICE of killing his family, He gets a 3rd trial. That isn't right, two different juries convicted him, HE'S GUILTY.
@DantesBbyGrl07 "Duh, thats why I dont believe half of what I read on it" You dont believe half of what you read on what? Her website? Cant be the transcripts because you haven't been near those.You say that Darlies family lies for her but you quote those same lies as proof of her innocence. If you dont believe her website, the transcripts, any of the post-trial proceedings, what do you believe? You accused me of lying about Kee suing Rowlett, I provide proof and you still say its a lie??
@DantesBbyGrl07 There's criteria to meet in order to receive a new trial. You don't just get a new trial because you don't like the way the first one went. Your state trooper was obviously able to come up with something in order to get 2 new trials. Darlie can't even come up with something for ONE. She'll have to have new evidence, D and she doesn't. I'll ask you again, why hasn't the defense shown the public that prayer service tape? The one that supposedly shows her grieving?
@DantesBbyGrl07 "Duh, that's why I don't believe half of what I have seen on it. Of course her mom and husband are going to back her up and swear she's 100% innocent. That's why I have said another trail is in order and a possible life sentence"
@DantesBbyGrl07 Crons testimony concerning the mulch was much too long to post here so I sent it in a personal message. Not trying to 'stalk' you. But you claimed that the police/Cron were talking about mulch under the window with the cut screen and that's not true. I said I'd send documentation, so there you have it.
@DantesBbyGrl07 You can make all the smart aleck remarks & sling all the insults you want, but you aren't changing anything. The woman is guilty and is right exactly where she belongs.
@ElleCM2 "Explain the sock found near the house not belonging to Darlie and had other DNA not known to the police inside it."
The sock belonged to Darin. There was no unknown DNA. The sock had blood from both boys on it and none of Darlie's. It also had her skin cell DNA in the toe.
@ElleCM2 Every time someone says this I ask the same question but never get an answer: what evidence is there that proves her innocence? If you'll tell me what it is, I'll be glad to explain it. I'm not aware of any evidence that proves anything but her guilt.
** The police say there was no evidence of an intruder but: **
1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member. Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house.
2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found.
@ElleCM2 "1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member.
Straight from Darlie's website. The prints were wet, bloody prints that did not have enough points of comparison to be linked to anyone. That is not going to change. Nothing of any good will ever come from those prints for Darlie. They got permission 3 years ago to run them in the national database... what's up?
@ElleCM2 "Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house."
Darlie's defense team will have to be able to link those hairs to the bloody prints or something else that can definitively indicate that there was an intruder. There are simply too many ways that something like a
facial/ public hair could have been brought into the house through transfer before the murders occurred .
@ElleCM2 "2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found."
There is absolutely no proof of a second knife being used. Read the autopsy reports of both boys and the testimony of Dr Joni McLain and Dr Janis Townsend-Parchman.
@2hereagain Actually from what I have read it has not as of yet, some of it yes, but for the most part her attorney's are in the process of working her appeal. You really should be careful spreading your falsehoods and lies. They're not helping you at all, sweetie.
@2hereagain Or you can stay blind to them. It's your choice.
Yes you most certainly can stay blind to the facts of the case. but to spread your own lies only makes YOU look foolish and VERY uneducated, but It is what it is. Have fun with your delusions. I think your medication needs to be checked, it seemed to have stopped working, LOL
** The police say there was no evidence of an intruder but: **
1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member. Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house.
@DantesBbyGrl07 2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found. Also blood from the 7 year old was not on the knife that was found.
3) Witnesses of the intruders not taken seriously by officers, and not checked out - including sighting of a man fitting the description given earlier by Darlie.
See testimony of Officer Jimmy Patterson prior to taking the fifth.
@DantesBbyGrl07 Police did not break the law at the cemetary. Darin & DArlie's mom sued the city of Rowlett and LOST because police had permission from the owners of the cemetary & there's no expected privacy in a public place. They took the 5th on the stand because Mulder waited until they got on the stand to accuse them of a crime. They answered all of Mulders other questions. Mulder had to do SOMETHING because he knew he couldn't show that tape. The only thing left was to try to discredit it.
@2hereagain ROFLMFAO, If you say so. They did not and you know it, The police needed a little thing called a WARRANT to wiretap the grave, but you would know this if you weren't still in GRADE school. Honestly, how have you lived so long, being so STUPID. Oh well, it is what it is. Believe what you choose, I'll stick to the FACTS
@DantesBbyGrl07 ROFLMFAO, If you say so. They did not and you know it, The police needed a little thing called a WARRANT to wiretap the grave, but you would know this if you weren't still in GRADE school. Honestly, how have you lived so long, being so STUPID. Oh well, it is what it is. Believe what you choose, I'll stick to the FACTS
Are you saying that Routier and Kee did not sue the city of Rowlett over the taping at the gravesites???
@2hereagain So by your logical the police can wiretap anything anywhere w/o worry of charges against them. Wrong sweetie, They needed a warrant even to wiretap a grave despite any "permission" they may or may not have received and since all we have is YOUR word, (No fact to back that up) I'm going to wager a guess that it is another one of your falsehoods. If Ms Kee sued and lost than it was for other reasons than that.
Also, The officer NEVER did answer the question, he "lawyered up" and continued to plead the 5th on the matter
Your delusions are truly astounding. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragically sad, the way you're reaching and grasping at straws. I actually pity you, truly. BTW don't post from the Transcript either it has been shown that there are over 33,000 errors there, so that's not helping your case at all either
@DantesBbyGrl07 I'm sure you don't want to see those transcripts. They're full of Darlie's guilt. Look, you keep making these same old comments that have been proven incorrect over and over again. The transcripts are posted right there on Darlie's support site. If you choose to continue to ignore them and their contents, that is up to you. You are not interested in the truth or trying to find it. My response to you from now on, no matter what you say will be, "Darlie killed her sleeping kids."
@DantesBbyGrl07 No, not by my logic, by law. Did you even bother to Google KEE v. CITY OF ROWLETT TEXAS or are you just going to ignore that? You have got to be joking. You cannot possibly be this obtuse. The court documents are online for the entire world to read. Are you denying their existance? What more back up could you possibly want?
@DantesBbyGrl07 9) "No mulch under window with slit screen, despite police statements."
Cron checked outside the window to see if any debri from the yard had been tracked up to the window, such as pieces of grass, mulch - anything that might have been tracked up there by someone who had gone through dewy grass or mulch in the surrounding flowerbeds. He did NOT say there was mulch under the window that wasn't disturbed.He said the mulch in the surrounding fowerbeds had not been disturbed.
@2hereagain No, Foolish one, they said "THE MULCH UNDER THE WINDOW was undisturbed" Thank you for showing how little you really know about the case. I KNEW you hadn't read the case, had you you would have known about the mulch, ANYONE who knows how to read can see it.
They even tried to trap Darin with it, Darin even told them that there was no mulch under that window. Cron, never said he was looking for tracking thru the yard, He said THE MULCH UNDER THE WINDOW WAS UNDISTURBED
@DantesBbyGrl07 "10) Screen was proven in court to be cut from the outside despite early police press releases and sworn statements to the contrary."
It wasn't "proven in court" the screen was cut fotm the outside, it was proven in analysis the STATE ordered on the screen.
And by the way, the only way it could possibly matter what side the screen was cut from would be if it was impossible to be done one way or the other. But the screen could be cut easily by Darlie from either side.
@DantesBbyGrl07 5 Q. Okay. Again, did you find any 6 evidence of blood along either the top portion of the T 7 or the bottom portion of the T? 8 A. No, sir, the screen was devoid of 9 blood. 10 Q. Okay. Did you ever form an opinion as 11 to whether or not you thought this cut had been made from 12 the outside looking in or from the inside of the garage 13 looking out? 14 A. There is one microscopic finding that 15 is more suggestive of it being punched from the outside.
@DantesBbyGrl07 1 to be? 2 A. Some type of syrupy material, maybe 3 soda pop or Kool-Aid. 4 Q. That was negative for blood? 5 A. That's right. 6 Q. Okay. What other areas did you test 7 then? 8 A. We tested the powdered, red material 9 on the sign, approximately in front of the freezer and 10 that was positive for the presumptive presence of blood. 11 Q. Okay. And, did you then have samples 12 of that blood actually taken from the garage? 13 A. Yes, sir. Ms. Long took those.
@2hereagain Nope sorry, FACT that Damon was stabbed with one knife whose blade was more narrow than the one used on Damon and Darlie. I'm sorry you're to uneducated to know this fact. Good day to you uneducated one. Oh BTW your projecting of namecalling me doesn't effect me at all. YOU have the mental awareness of a piss ant.
@DantesBbyGrl07 A facial and a limb hair. Hmmmmm........ But not one single hair from the head of that shoulder-length haired intruder that struggled with Darlie?
They can run that wet print until the cows come home. Not enough points of comparison then, not enough now.
@rubbaduckgurl27 Don't worry about her, I have seen the same stuff and the lack of mulch officer claimed was there and untouched, the window so close to the ground anyone could easily step over it and NOT disturb dust. Her neck wound coming with 2mm of her CA. There is enough that I can see why she was convicted, but there is also enough to point to her being innocent as well, or least having not acted alone
@rubbaduckgurl27 Also, look at the fact the jury never saw the prayer meeting prior to the infamous silly string video, nor did they hear about Darlie's mom telling her to stop crying because she was scaring the other children at the party. There's a lot that points to her guilt but there is a lot more that points to her being innocent. Of course there a two LOSERS here who dispute that fact with me, but oh well It is what it is.
@DantesBbyGrl07 The jury never saw the "prayer tape" because Darlie's defense chose not to show it. There's is only one reason that they wouldn't show it and that would be that it didn't show one solitary thing to help Routier. The defense has had that tape for years. How come they haven't shown it at all, EVER??? They only thing you'll ever see are the little snippits we've all seen. They don't want you to see anything else in it and that's why the defense chose not to show it in court or ever.
@2hereagain You PRETEND to have an answer for everything don't you? Seeing her crying over her sons wouldn't have helped her case? If that isn't the dumbest comment I have seen from you yet, I don't know what is. I'm sorry you show me a tape of a mother grieving for her slain boys and her mom telling her to stop crying, One I'm going to be pissed at the older Mom and two I'm gonna take a hard look at her innocence. but hey if your way helps you sleep at night, go with it.
@rubbaduckgurl27 hmmm she seems to lie, why did she write letters from prison saying she knows who killed her kids ??? her defense team even said they wern't expecting that..
@rubbaduckgurl27 but no1 else has a motive to kill two boys ?? and not even robb anything from the house?? if ther were signs of a struggle why cnt she member at all what he/see looks like
what about the bloody fingerprint that was in the house that belongs to nobody living in the house? what about the many wounds she had that prosecution claims were self inflicted, any one of which could have killed her? If she had died, her guilt or innocence wouldn't be an issue. add to that the fact that darin made a deal to keep himself out of the public eye, and it looks more likely he could have done it or knows who did...darlie is just a scapegoat
@zephyrfalcon1966 Experts have compared that print to everyone who was at the scene that night and the only person they cannot rule out is Darlie.
Furthermore the defense's own expert has shown that the print most likely belonged to Darlie. Professor Jantz did an anthropological study on the print (you can read the results in his affidavits) and the end result is that the print was twice as likely to belong to a woman than a male.
@zephyrfalcon1966 None of Darlie's wounds were life-threatening. If she had died, IMO she would still have been found to be the killer when the lack of a blood trail would arise. Darlie isn't a scapegoat, she's a killer.
@2hereagain 2 mm from her CA isn't life threatening? C'mon, slice your throat that close to the CA and see what a doctor does. Oh BTW it's in the court and medical files that her neck wound came within 2mm of her CA, Go read it, that is IF you know how, LOSER.
@Incredevil No, it was later proven to not belong to anyone in the house, Although watch out here comes 2hereagainloser to say I'm incorrect. I swear that FAT COW ought to go into law, she's got the lying part down pat. Or maybe I should say REACHING part. Anyone disagrees with her mindset gets flamed all the way around, One word for ppl like her: IMMATURE, pure and simple.
@zephyrfalcon1966 Add to that the mulch that they say was untouched, when at the point of entry there was no mulch at all. Oh and the window sill being low enough to the ground at for an intruder NOT to disturb any "dust" that may have been there.
This has been flagged as spam show
Join us on Facebook:
The Darlie Routier Case, Free Darlie Routier, Justice For Darlie Routier, Darlie Routier is Guilty.... and lot's more.
2hereagain 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For those of you that belive in Darlie's innocence, please visit and help her with your comments and more on Facebook "Free Darlie Routier". This site was set up by a friend of mine trying to help free her from this nightmare of unjust police and media work. Let's do what we can to get this woman some long over due justice. There are other supportive sites there as well. God bless us all and help out justice system protect the innocent regardless of there peraonal problems.
holland1904 2 weeks ago
Yeah because some random dude is going to randomly come to your house, kill your two boys while you sopposely sleep threw it and he only gives you a few cuts and stabs and leaves the knife and runs? It astounds me that these evil mothers continue to lie about it no matter what evidence you throw at them.. But hey i guess it worked for Casey Anthony.
YouHaveATinyPenis 2 weeks ago
Note: sociopath with heavy narsistic traits...she names her kids devon damon and drake. Notices all the ds (narcissm). Also, all heavy devil like names..bitch has as much conscience as a can of silly string
Wayfarer515 1 month ago
the motive is age old...money. She was going to get $5,000 apiece for both kids from insurance policies (according to Hush Little Babies by Don Davis)
floydxpixie 1 month ago
how could she slept through while the intruder stabbed her two sons. The stab were so deep down through the carpet. She is as guilty as hell.
penny539 3 months ago
Hair on the screen??? She lived in the house! The dust on the sill was not disturbed because one does not have to touch a window sill that is that low to step through.
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez The hair on the screen was tested and was not Darlie's. You may not have to touch the window going out of it - with no screen. Look at the narrow, cluttered pathway, the T-cut in the screen. Blood on the utility room door actually dripped down the door it was so heavy with blood. How did this "intruder" get through that screen with so much blood on him and get none on the screen or window?
2hereagain 3 months ago
@2hereagain One question that lingers in my mind. What was her motive? The murder was over kill. I somewhat believe that there was someone there who had rape in mind and had to get rid of the children that were there first. Maybe a secret stalker...but this murder is not what a mother like Darlie would have done. I just don't see where this makes any sense at all. Who knows, maybe the killer will admit this crime in the future. Hopefully before she is put to death.
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez Motive... who knows why people do these things? Makes no sense on any level. A rapist would have used her children to make her submit to him. The attack on the children was personal and they were the intended targets. Alan Brantley of the FBI said that the children were killed by someone that knew them & knew them well. Darlie is the killer and she will never admit to what she's done.
2hereagain 2 months ago
@2hereagain No one knows that a rapist would have used the kids to make her submit. I don't believe that. That is not even an educated guess. A rapist would want to eliminate anyone else but the one he was targeting. That is my opinion. As for the FBI....they are not God! Their opinion is heresay and only speculation. They will always side with the police and believe me ...there are crooked cops!
LuckyBlueEyez 2 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez
lol... Sounds like you've had a bit of trouble with the law...
That doesn't change the facts of the case or the evidence against her, though. There was no rape, no rapist, no intruder. Darlie Routier murdered her children as they slept at her feet.
2hereagain 2 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez "No one knows that a rapist would have used the kids to make her submit. I don't believe that. That is not even an educated guess."
No, it's not an educated guess, it's a statistical fact.
If a man comes in to rape a woman & there are children present, MORE LIKELY THAN NOT, the rapist will use the children to make the woman submit. If he kills her children first, she would go nuts on him & submit to nothing. Don't believe it. That's your choice but it won't change the facts.
2hereagain 2 months ago
@2hereagain It's only your statistical fact. Statistics are not fact...they are merely probablity.
LuckyBlueEyez 2 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez Ok... well, with that probability as well as the 97% probability that this was done by a parent and considering the blood evidence, her inconsistent stories and injuries... Yep... she did it.
2hereagain 2 months ago
She didn't have time to run down the damn street 3 blockes away and run back...are you insane!
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LuckyBlueEyez "She didn't have time to run down the damn street 3 blockes away and run back...are you insane!"
She didn't run 3 BLOCKS away, she ran 3 HOUSES away. Three houses down the alley from her house.
2hereagain 3 months ago
I remember her.....
rahla53 3 months ago
I hope that white trash bitch burns in hell!!!
But first she needs to die a lonely painful slow death from the worst cancer possible!!!
Die Bitch
5050pete 4 months ago
Ignore 2hereagains comments, he or she is an evil person that makes Devon and Damon Routier roll over in their graves calling their mother a killer. I am going to go to 2hereagains house and stab him or her to death and show him or her what life threatening wounds are because all those forensic shows about the Routier case and the police have brainwashed the person into thinking Darlie is guilty. The real killer could confess and be arrested someday and 2hereagain would still be saying Darlie
realityandgameshow 5 months ago
@realityandgameshow The evidence against her is overwhelming. Darlie Routier killed her kids and now she has to pay for it. It has nothing to do with me.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@2hereagain Only a retard would think that Darlie killed her kids and only a dumb person would think that Darlie killed her kids and that makes you a dumb retard because you believe Darlie killed her kids.
realityandgameshow 5 months ago
@realityandgameshow LOL... what an educated, well thought out reply. All evidence points to Routier.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@2hereagain It is not overwhelming, the police just put the clothes from the kids bodies in bags from albertsons and the blood evidence is contaminated. The police work is shotty and when Darlie goes free and the real killer is put behind bars you will realize that Darlie is innocent and you will also realize what a retard you are.
realityandgameshow 5 months ago
@realityandgameshow The blood evidence was not contaminated and the kids clothes weren't bagged up. Damon went to the hospital in what he had on at the time, Devon's body was left at the scene with what he had on.
Darlie will never go free. The only way for that to happen would be if they can prove that an intruder was in the house, which is not possible because there was no intruder.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@realityandgameshow That is why the police want to throw all on her and be done with the case as they always do. It's easier for them to close the books and take credit. Hide their mistakes by throwing the scent off of their trail. So many people are wrongly accused and spend their lives behind bars because of shoddy police work.
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez "Hide their mistakes by throwing the scent off of their trail. "
You mean there was evidence of an intruder and the police decided to frame an innocent mother instead?
2hereagain 3 months ago
All these so-called experts wanna analyze every PAID detail of a persons crime while they're on trial! It's alot easier sometimes just to see someone for who they really are.It's in our DNA,for us to be able to know when we're being deceived.All these LAWS protecting criminals,makes you forget why they were a criminal! Lawyers get so caught up in the Political correctness that they forget about the NATURE of the ACCUSED,and what they've done! You'll see lawyers having a laugh with their clients
MrAmericanzombie 5 months ago
Who in the world sleeps through an attack? Give me a break.
JuJuMJFan4life 6 months ago 8
@JuJuMJFan4life If you were paying attention to the Darlie Routier segment of American Justice you would realize that Darlie's husband said he does not believe she slept through the attack that when the intruder knocked her unconscious she says she woke up.
realityandgameshow 5 months ago
@realityandgameshow Go to her first interview from prison in 1997 and you'll hear Darlie say the same thing... what's your point? She says she has no memory of what happened, by the way.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@2hereagain Tramatic experiences tend to alter memory and details are not processed correctly. Bits and pieces come back at times but the ordeal is not memorized with precision. One can do their best to recall but confusion and mixed thoughts intersect along with horrible scenes that play out in thoughts of what you saw.
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
@JuJuMJFan4life I'm just saying, I could sleep through anything.Especially if I been drinking.
scumgod13 2 weeks ago
What about forensics? Forensic technology is all the rage these days. They need to use more forensics for this case.
Godzillaman 6 months ago
@Godzillaman They have. It all points to Darlie.
2hereagain 6 months ago
@2hereagain
But why didn't she kill her husband? He had a pretty hefty life insurance policy on him.
Godzillaman 6 months ago
@Godzillaman I think her intention when she killed the kids was to hurt Darin. I don't think it had anything at all to do with money.
2hereagain 6 months ago
@2hereagain
If that was true, why didn't she kill all three instead of just two?
Godzillaman 6 months ago
@Godzillaman The baby was upstairs with Darin, the boys were downstairs with her. Darlie's little sister Dana came home with Darin that night, had dinner with them, Darin took her home. Darlie & Darin had a huge fight that night, which they denied in the beginning but eventually admitted to. There was considerable gossip about infidelity on both sides. She was mentally unstable & losing all that was dear to her. (con't)
2hereagain 6 months ago
@Godzillaman (con't) I think that she snapped. I think whatever they argued about that night made her so angry that all she could think about was revenge.
2hereagain 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are pages for both sides on Facebook:
The 'Darlie Routier is Guilty' page and the 'Justice For Darlie' page. Maybe a couple of others as well. Just search her name and they'll all pop up..
2hereagain 6 months ago
Hmmm does the sound on this suck for anyone else or is it just me?
AmberTrystan 7 months ago in playlist US Female Death Row Inmates 2
@AmberTrystan yes it sucks
71shelle 6 months ago
I wonder how Robert Stack felt narrating and presenting some of these stories. Like, for some of them, he must've known the alternate scenario was bullshit but he had to tell the story. Heavy.
thesuckpuppet18 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 I don't think anybody can explain anything to you... YIKES!!!
BS1Fan 7 months ago 2
@Stara3181967 Your minds eye? ha ha ha lol and OMG... are you really serious??? Um, I don't think I'm gonna talk to you anymore. It seems like you really do have some kind of mental issues.
BS1Fan 7 months ago 3
@Stara3181967 Watch and listen to what?
pamelac123 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 Now get??? ha ha ha You're quite an odd person but good for a laugh!
BS1Fan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Stara3181967 I DON'T HAVE A COLLEGE EDUCATION
we noticed
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 um... your stories are pretty goofy and don't make any sense. At least she makes sense!
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 Yeah... ha ha you're a whack job!!!
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 Are you serious with this sh*t??? This must be a joke!
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 ha ha... the post I replied to, professional.
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 Whats your point?
BS1Fan 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 LOL
pamelac123 7 months ago
I thought about all possibilities and for an intruder to eliminate the kids as any witnesses, he would have to kill them. It is also possible that this was not a robbery but rather an attemped rape gone bad. That could be the reason for nothing taken. When everything got out of hand, the intruder freaked and fled. As for Darlie not feeling anything or hearing anything, this could be due to having some liquor the night before. It may have knocked her out, and the reason behind felling grogy.
LuckyBlueEyez 7 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez An intruder slaughters two sleeping children but leaves the only witness who could identify him alive? It is more likely than not that an intruder hell-bent on raping her would have used her children to get her to submit to him, not kill them first thing. It should be obvious to anyone that the children were the intended targets. Darlie's toxicology test came back clean, except for the prescription diet pills she was taking. No alcohol or drugs in her system.
pamelac123 7 months ago
The sock could have been what the intruder picked up in the house to hind any fingerprints. Then when he left while running away, he could have taken the sock off of his hand.
LuckyBlueEyez 7 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez The sock had blood from both boys and none of Darlie's. Her skin cell DNA was found in the toe of the sock.
pamelac123 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 I agree they had a huge fight that night. But the rest of your post.......
pamelac123 7 months ago
@Stara3181967 Ridiculous...
pamelac123 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the difference and similarities between the casey anthony case and the darlie routier case is extremely bothersome. darlie was convicted because she was pretty, and for the way she acted. casey was ACQUITTED because she is pretty and the jury IGNORED the WAY SHE ACTED. i wonder what would have happened if casey anthony was treated the way darlie routier was. at least darlie showed emotion over her dead children. casey anthony, you suck.
barkpeeler2000 7 months ago
justicefordarliecom
TooHard2FakeItt 8 months ago
and he lied again 2 mths ago
MsLourie1 8 months ago
any da thats crazy enough to allow prostitution of women needs to sit next to her i have the pic to prove it on my bday
MsLourie1 8 months ago
It's Texas, tunnel vison, she did not do this. Babies dies, it;s easy to say it was the mother. She ran and through a tube sock blocks away to throw off the investigation? Texas is out of their minds. The real killer is free. What a messed up justice system.
1965JLO 9 months ago
@1965JLO Darlie Routier murdered her children. The sock was found 3 houses down, not "blocks" away. It's never easy to say the mother is the murderer, but strong forensic evidence says it was. The real killer is Darlie and she is right where she belongs.
2hereagain 9 months ago 10
@2hereagain There is equally enough evidence to prove she is innocent.
desertedsoulx 7 months ago
@desertedsoulx Really? What is it?
2hereagain 7 months ago
Comment removed
2hereagain 7 months ago
@desertedsoulx Its okay, when she dies, I will go honor her grave by spraying silly string on her tombstone.
TheMedievalMan 7 months ago
@TheMedievalMan The silly string was a tradition. Even though the children were gone, she could still celebrate a birthday. I don't think she had come to terms with them being gone. She wanted to do something for the birthday and felt good about being close to them. Like she was still with them. This made her feel good and she just didn't want to think of them as gone. She was trying to avoid reality because in reality, they were dead. She would rather feel like time was being shared with them.
LuckyBlueEyez 7 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez "The silly string was a tradition" It was "inappropriate" for them to spray the silly string and Darlie's upcoming vow renewal that August, but perfectly appropriate for for it to be sprayed over the boys graves a week after they were murdered. I know that people do tacky things and that doesn't make them a murderer, it's just disturbing.
pamelac123 7 months ago
She was not forced to slep downstairs. That is an assumption, not fact. You weren't there. There was no blood on the sock because she did not have the sock in her possesion. There was plenty of blood in the house and more than enough of hers to get on everything. Maybe this happened, and maybe that happened. Stara, you could make up over 2 dozens scanarios but lacking evidence, Many that would make a great fiction movie if you could think of everything to make it sound more interesting to view.
LuckyBlueEyez 7 months ago
@LuckyBlueEyez Okay... I dont know why you are telling me all of this. All I said was I am going to honor her with some silly string... you know, the same way she did with her sons.
TheMedievalMan 7 months ago 3
@TheMedievalMan Your message was loud and clear as well as sarcastic!
LuckyBlueEyez 7 months ago
@2hereagain I don't automatically think that just because Darlie is a mother that she couldn't murder her children because I know Susan Smith murdered her children, and what about Baby Grace whose body was in a box from walmart, I believe her mother Kimberly was responsible, what about Andrea Yates, I don't believe she is innocent of drowning her kids in the bathtub, when I hear about new murder cases of mothers murdering their children, I don't always think they are innocent but Darlie is.
realityandgameshow 5 months ago
jurors were never shown the pictures of darlie's body after her attack. she is so very bruised, obviously beaten....this alone should allow for a retrial. she is innocent and is being judged on the 'silly string' incident, which is absurd. again, the jury was not shown the entire tape of the memorial service, or how upset the family was. show ALL the evidence, especially in a death penalty trial....
laceydays1 10 months ago
@laceydays1 The pictures of Darlie's injuries were show to the jury. On Darlie's own support site is a list of evidence offered by both the state & defense. Trial transcripts/testimony reflect that the photos were shown and argued. They were a strong point of her defense. She was not judged on the SS tape. There was strong forensic evidence that pointed to no one but Routier.
2hereagain 10 months ago 4
@laceydays1 It was Routier's own attorney who chose not to show the memorial service tape... why do you think her own attorney wouldn't show a tape of her supposedly grieving when he knew that the state was showing the SS tape which shows her very obviously NOT grieving?
2hereagain 10 months ago
@laceydays1 "jurors were never shown the pictures of darlie's body after her attack. she is so very bruised, obviously beaten....this alone should allow for a retrial."
That would be a good reason for a new trial, if it were true. But it's not. The photo's of what injuries she did have were shown. And her "body" wasn't bruised, the underside of her arms were. Pretty strange for someone who went through this terrible beating not to have bruising anywhere else except the underside of her arms.
2hereagain 10 months ago 2
@2hereagain the bruises on her arms could have been left when one of her sons was kicking at the person who was attacking him. They did mention that one of them had bruises on his heels.
hopefloats57 10 months ago
@hopefloats57 I agree. It was her oldest son Devon that was bruised and he was laying face up when she attacked him. So he probably gave her a fight. Bless his heart, poor babies. It makes me sick for them. I think she 'enhanced' her bruises also.
2hereagain 10 months ago 2
sargeant poos
MeesterCrumpet 11 months ago
any bitch crazy enough to stab her little boys to death is crazy enough and capable of inflicting those injuries to herself
MeesterCrumpet 11 months ago 6
blood doesnt lie
MeesterCrumpet 11 months ago 5
She is so guilty, I hope that juice this murderer soon.
lundqkm 11 months ago 2
Comment removed
2hereagain 11 months ago
21 Q. When you were looking at this area,
22 the windowsill portion of this window, what types of
23 things were you looking for?
24 A. Signs of an intruder going through it.
25 Disturbed dust, foot prints, blood, any outside debris
Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter
2179
2hereagain 11 months ago
1 that might have been carried in through the clothing or
2 shoes of the intruder such as bark, mulch, any type of
3 damp vegetation, just any signs that an entry and exit
4 was made through the window, foreign material and
5 disturbed areas.
6 Q. Sir, did you find any scuff marks or
7 shoe prints, foreign material or any evidence whatsoever
8 that an entry had been made either in or out of that
9 window shown in State's Exhibit No. 41-A?
2hereagain 11 months ago
10 A. No. There was a solid layer of dust
11 along the entire length of the white windowsill and it
12 was undisturbed.
13 Q. What do mean undisturbed?
14 A. There was no streaks through it, no
15 signs of movement through it. It was an even layer, it's
16 sort of like new fallen snow. It was obvious that
17 nothing had gone through it.
2hereagain 11 months ago
A majority of these things you are posting have already been back to court and ruled on, cowgirl! The blood in the garage not being tested, this was testified to in court, it was NOT blood, yet they keep telling that lie, because they know not everyone who reads it will check it out. Lies are the only way they can get/keep supporters. Like so many other of their lies, all you have to do is take what they say and back it up with the facts. Or you can stay blind to them. It's your choice.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain At least I'm backing up what I say, You expect people to believe only your words. Which only make YOU look foolish and uneducated.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 How have you backed up one word you've said? You haven't. You have gone to Routiers website & taken everything they've said as the truth without taking even a moment to research a word of it. They depend on you & others like you for support. People who will go no further than her support sites & believe she was wronged. I can back up everything I say, but you are so afraid of hearing the truth that you've blocked me from sending you messages. You dont want to hear the truth.
2hereagain 11 months ago 2
@2hereagain Actually, No I haven't. You yourself have stated that the Transcript contained over 33,000 errors yet you keep trying to shove it down my throat. I won't believe anything in the transcript till the courts admit they flubbed up. Here's the deal sweetie, You have your OPINION and I have mine. Leave it at that.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 So you're also saying that the the courts never admitted the transcripts were flawed, they were never corrected, and the ones that DARLIES SUPPORTERS have posted on DARLIES SUPPORT sites aren't valid or correct?
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain Duh, that's why I don't believe half of what I have seen on it. Of course her mom and husband are going to back her up and swear she's 100% innocent. That's why I have said another trail is in order and a possible life sentence, You HAVE to admit that much. I don't like killers in general, We have a former Ind state trooper convicted TWICE of killing his family, He gets a 3rd trial. That isn't right, two different juries convicted him, HE'S GUILTY.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 "Duh, thats why I dont believe half of what I read on it" You dont believe half of what you read on what? Her website? Cant be the transcripts because you haven't been near those.You say that Darlies family lies for her but you quote those same lies as proof of her innocence. If you dont believe her website, the transcripts, any of the post-trial proceedings, what do you believe? You accused me of lying about Kee suing Rowlett, I provide proof and you still say its a lie??
2hereagain 11 months ago 2
@DantesBbyGrl07 There's criteria to meet in order to receive a new trial. You don't just get a new trial because you don't like the way the first one went. Your state trooper was obviously able to come up with something in order to get 2 new trials. Darlie can't even come up with something for ONE. She'll have to have new evidence, D and she doesn't. I'll ask you again, why hasn't the defense shown the public that prayer service tape? The one that supposedly shows her grieving?
2hereagain 11 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@DantesBbyGrl07 "Duh, that's why I don't believe half of what I have seen on it. Of course her mom and husband are going to back her up and swear she's 100% innocent. That's why I have said another trail is in order and a possible life sentence"
I thought you believed she was innocent?
2hereagain 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DantesBbyGrl07 Crons testimony concerning the mulch was much too long to post here so I sent it in a personal message. Not trying to 'stalk' you. But you claimed that the police/Cron were talking about mulch under the window with the cut screen and that's not true. I said I'd send documentation, so there you have it.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 You can make all the smart aleck remarks & sling all the insults you want, but you aren't changing anything. The woman is guilty and is right exactly where she belongs.
hopefloats57 9 months ago 15
@hopefloats57
Explain the sock found near the house not belonging to Darlie and had other DNA not known to the police inside it.
EXPLAIN all the evidence proving her innocence.
ElleCM2 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ElleCM2 "Explain the sock found near the house not belonging to Darlie and had other DNA not known to the police inside it."
The sock belonged to Darin. There was no unknown DNA. The sock had blood from both boys on it and none of Darlie's. It also had her skin cell DNA in the toe.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@ElleCM2 Every time someone says this I ask the same question but never get an answer: what evidence is there that proves her innocence? If you'll tell me what it is, I'll be glad to explain it. I'm not aware of any evidence that proves anything but her guilt.
2hereagain 5 months ago
** The police say there was no evidence of an intruder but: **
1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member. Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house.
2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found.
wwwDOTfordarlieroutierDOTorg/HerProof/indexDOThtml
ElleCM2 5 months ago
@ElleCM2 "1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member.
Straight from Darlie's website. The prints were wet, bloody prints that did not have enough points of comparison to be linked to anyone. That is not going to change. Nothing of any good will ever come from those prints for Darlie. They got permission 3 years ago to run them in the national database... what's up?
2hereagain 5 months ago
@ElleCM2 "Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house."
Darlie's defense team will have to be able to link those hairs to the bloody prints or something else that can definitively indicate that there was an intruder. There are simply too many ways that something like a
facial/ public hair could have been brought into the house through transfer before the murders occurred .
2hereagain 5 months ago
@ElleCM2 "2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found."
There is absolutely no proof of a second knife being used. Read the autopsy reports of both boys and the testimony of Dr Joni McLain and Dr Janis Townsend-Parchman.
2hereagain 5 months ago
@hopefloats57 You don't know that!
LuckyBlueEyez 3 months ago
@2hereagain Actually from what I have read it has not as of yet, some of it yes, but for the most part her attorney's are in the process of working her appeal. You really should be careful spreading your falsehoods and lies. They're not helping you at all, sweetie.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@2hereagain Or you can stay blind to them. It's your choice.
Yes you most certainly can stay blind to the facts of the case. but to spread your own lies only makes YOU look foolish and VERY uneducated, but It is what it is. Have fun with your delusions. I think your medication needs to be checked, it seemed to have stopped working, LOL
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
** The police say there was no evidence of an intruder but: **
1) There were bloody finger/palm prints at the scene that do not match any family member. Also hairs (facial and limb) were found and were not matched with any known person in the house.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 2) Two Murder weapons were used, only one was found. Two weapons because some of the deep wounds were too narrow to be made by the knife that was found. Also blood from the 7 year old was not on the knife that was found.
3) Witnesses of the intruders not taken seriously by officers, and not checked out - including sighting of a man fitting the description given earlier by Darlie.
See testimony of Officer Jimmy Patterson prior to taking the fifth.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07
4) Blood pattern on Darlie's clothes (w/ DNA map) is not consistent with her as the murderer.
5) The police contaminated the evidence by putting many of the bloody items in one bag before the blood was dry.
6) Contradicting statements within the four corners of the affidavit made by officer Jimmy Ray Patterson and used to swear out a warrant.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 7) Mistakes in facts in the affidavit used to swear out a warrant.
8) Blood found in the garage and seen in exhibits, despite police statements to the contrary.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 9) No mulch under window with slit screen, despite police statements.
10) Screen was proven in court to be cut from the outside despite early police press releases and sworn statements to the contrary.
11) There was a bloody sock found 75 yards from the house which could not have been left by Darlie or Darin because of the time line
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 Not to mention the police broke the law when they wiretapped the grave of the two boys, The officer even pleaded the fifth in court.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 Police did not break the law at the cemetary. Darin & DArlie's mom sued the city of Rowlett and LOST because police had permission from the owners of the cemetary & there's no expected privacy in a public place. They took the 5th on the stand because Mulder waited until they got on the stand to accuse them of a crime. They answered all of Mulders other questions. Mulder had to do SOMETHING because he knew he couldn't show that tape. The only thing left was to try to discredit it.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain ROFLMFAO, If you say so. They did not and you know it, The police needed a little thing called a WARRANT to wiretap the grave, but you would know this if you weren't still in GRADE school. Honestly, how have you lived so long, being so STUPID. Oh well, it is what it is. Believe what you choose, I'll stick to the FACTS
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DantesBbyGrl07 ROFLMFAO, If you say so. They did not and you know it, The police needed a little thing called a WARRANT to wiretap the grave, but you would know this if you weren't still in GRADE school. Honestly, how have you lived so long, being so STUPID. Oh well, it is what it is. Believe what you choose, I'll stick to the FACTS
Are you saying that Routier and Kee did not sue the city of Rowlett over the taping at the gravesites???
2hereagain 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 All you have to do is Google this: KEE v. CITY OF ROWLETT TEXAS
They did not have to have a warrant and they did nothing wrong. Darlie's defense had this tape, ehy don't they show it?
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain So by your logical the police can wiretap anything anywhere w/o worry of charges against them. Wrong sweetie, They needed a warrant even to wiretap a grave despite any "permission" they may or may not have received and since all we have is YOUR word, (No fact to back that up) I'm going to wager a guess that it is another one of your falsehoods. If Ms Kee sued and lost than it was for other reasons than that.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
Also, The officer NEVER did answer the question, he "lawyered up" and continued to plead the 5th on the matter
Your delusions are truly astounding. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragically sad, the way you're reaching and grasping at straws. I actually pity you, truly. BTW don't post from the Transcript either it has been shown that there are over 33,000 errors there, so that's not helping your case at all either
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 I'm sure you don't want to see those transcripts. They're full of Darlie's guilt. Look, you keep making these same old comments that have been proven incorrect over and over again. The transcripts are posted right there on Darlie's support site. If you choose to continue to ignore them and their contents, that is up to you. You are not interested in the truth or trying to find it. My response to you from now on, no matter what you say will be, "Darlie killed her sleeping kids."
2hereagain 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DantesBbyGrl07 No, not by my logic, by law. Did you even bother to Google KEE v. CITY OF ROWLETT TEXAS or are you just going to ignore that? You have got to be joking. You cannot possibly be this obtuse. The court documents are online for the entire world to read. Are you denying their existance? What more back up could you possibly want?
2hereagain 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 9) "No mulch under window with slit screen, despite police statements."
Cron checked outside the window to see if any debri from the yard had been tracked up to the window, such as pieces of grass, mulch - anything that might have been tracked up there by someone who had gone through dewy grass or mulch in the surrounding flowerbeds. He did NOT say there was mulch under the window that wasn't disturbed.He said the mulch in the surrounding fowerbeds had not been disturbed.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain No, Foolish one, they said "THE MULCH UNDER THE WINDOW was undisturbed" Thank you for showing how little you really know about the case. I KNEW you hadn't read the case, had you you would have known about the mulch, ANYONE who knows how to read can see it.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
They even tried to trap Darin with it, Darin even told them that there was no mulch under that window. Cron, never said he was looking for tracking thru the yard, He said THE MULCH UNDER THE WINDOW WAS UNDISTURBED
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
Comment removed
2hereagain 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 "10) Screen was proven in court to be cut from the outside despite early police press releases and sworn statements to the contrary."
It wasn't "proven in court" the screen was cut fotm the outside, it was proven in analysis the STATE ordered on the screen.
And by the way, the only way it could possibly matter what side the screen was cut from would be if it was impossible to be done one way or the other. But the screen could be cut easily by Darlie from either side.
2hereagain 11 months ago
2hereagain 11 months ago
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain DA statement not expert. Are you related to the DA, Maybe screwing him? You seem to be very biased and ill informed on the matter.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 11.Q All right. Now, I want to direct your
12 attention to the garage section of the house. Did you
13 and Miss Long make some determination at that point about
14 collecting some stuff there in the garage?
2hereagain 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 Only one murder weapon was used. The one that Darlie took out of her butcher block and stabbed her kids with.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain Nope sorry, FACT that Damon was stabbed with one knife whose blade was more narrow than the one used on Damon and Darlie. I'm sorry you're to uneducated to know this fact. Good day to you uneducated one. Oh BTW your projecting of namecalling me doesn't effect me at all. YOU have the mental awareness of a piss ant.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 A facial and a limb hair. Hmmmmm........ But not one single hair from the head of that shoulder-length haired intruder that struggled with Darlie?
They can run that wet print until the cows come home. Not enough points of comparison then, not enough now.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@rubbaduckgurl27 Don't worry about her, I have seen the same stuff and the lack of mulch officer claimed was there and untouched, the window so close to the ground anyone could easily step over it and NOT disturb dust. Her neck wound coming with 2mm of her CA. There is enough that I can see why she was convicted, but there is also enough to point to her being innocent as well, or least having not acted alone
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@rubbaduckgurl27 Also, look at the fact the jury never saw the prayer meeting prior to the infamous silly string video, nor did they hear about Darlie's mom telling her to stop crying because she was scaring the other children at the party. There's a lot that points to her guilt but there is a lot more that points to her being innocent. Of course there a two LOSERS here who dispute that fact with me, but oh well It is what it is.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@DantesBbyGrl07 The jury never saw the "prayer tape" because Darlie's defense chose not to show it. There's is only one reason that they wouldn't show it and that would be that it didn't show one solitary thing to help Routier. The defense has had that tape for years. How come they haven't shown it at all, EVER??? They only thing you'll ever see are the little snippits we've all seen. They don't want you to see anything else in it and that's why the defense chose not to show it in court or ever.
2hereagain 11 months ago
@2hereagain You PRETEND to have an answer for everything don't you? Seeing her crying over her sons wouldn't have helped her case? If that isn't the dumbest comment I have seen from you yet, I don't know what is. I'm sorry you show me a tape of a mother grieving for her slain boys and her mom telling her to stop crying, One I'm going to be pissed at the older Mom and two I'm gonna take a hard look at her innocence. but hey if your way helps you sleep at night, go with it.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
hmmmm...im not sure what to think. i think she did it. but why though??
nirvanalover16 1 year ago
Comment removed
andrewwLEGEND 1 year ago
bitch killed her kids
lisastevenson1022 1 year ago 5
a real killerr had first raped her and then her boys.no rape -no motive
TheUnknownGrower 1 year ago
@TheUnknownGrower ...ok...
2hereagain 1 year ago
@2hereagain
no one raped anyone. Darlie committed the murders
Christine5000 1 year ago
@Christine5000 I'm sorry... where did I state that Darlie had been raped?
2hereagain 1 year ago
why did experts find out that she was moving from room to room and not staying in one place where she said she was?
why was there so much blood on the kitchen floor and sink that had been washed off?
why were there NO bloody footprints of an intruder at all? he couldnt just magically kill the boys and hover over the ground.
why was the broken wine glass ON the bloodprints, and not vice versa? darlie said the glass broke first.
and, and, and...
PART II
Incredevil 1 year ago
Lots of evidence why she IS guilty:
No blood trail outside the house
Her wounds differ from those of her sons (she had cutting wounds, they had stab wounds)
she couldnt give a description of the killer
she said she was attacked on the sofa (there was no blood found though)
she said the killer dropped the knife in the kitchen (there was no bloody print)
they found fiber glass on the bread knife that was INSIDE the house, so she cut the screen door herself
PART I
Incredevil 1 year ago 2
Why would an alleged home invador/ attacker attack the kids??
Makes no sense whatsoever
rodanosamehr 1 year ago 11
no one had a motive? why did a sherriff rape me and mo say they are sorry?
MsLourie1 1 year ago
@rubbaduckgurl27 hmmm she seems to lie, why did she write letters from prison saying she knows who killed her kids ??? her defense team even said they wern't expecting that..
54321ade 1 year ago
@rubbaduckgurl27 but no1 else has a motive to kill two boys ?? and not even robb anything from the house?? if ther were signs of a struggle why cnt she member at all what he/see looks like
54321ade 1 year ago
what about the bloody fingerprint that was in the house that belongs to nobody living in the house? what about the many wounds she had that prosecution claims were self inflicted, any one of which could have killed her? If she had died, her guilt or innocence wouldn't be an issue. add to that the fact that darin made a deal to keep himself out of the public eye, and it looks more likely he could have done it or knows who did...darlie is just a scapegoat
zephyrfalcon1966 1 year ago
@zephyrfalcon1966 Experts have compared that print to everyone who was at the scene that night and the only person they cannot rule out is Darlie.
Furthermore the defense's own expert has shown that the print most likely belonged to Darlie. Professor Jantz did an anthropological study on the print (you can read the results in his affidavits) and the end result is that the print was twice as likely to belong to a woman than a male.
(con't)
2hereagain 1 year ago
@zephyrfalcon1966 None of Darlie's wounds were life-threatening. If she had died, IMO she would still have been found to be the killer when the lack of a blood trail would arise. Darlie isn't a scapegoat, she's a killer.
2hereagain 1 year ago
@2hereagain 2 mm from her CA isn't life threatening? C'mon, slice your throat that close to the CA and see what a doctor does. Oh BTW it's in the court and medical files that her neck wound came within 2mm of her CA, Go read it, that is IF you know how, LOSER.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@zephyrfalcon1966
look at all the other evidence.
plus, no one said the bloody finger print didnt belong to anyone in the house. it just couldnt be fully identified!
Incredevil 1 year ago
@Incredevil No, it was later proven to not belong to anyone in the house, Although watch out here comes 2hereagainloser to say I'm incorrect. I swear that FAT COW ought to go into law, she's got the lying part down pat. Or maybe I should say REACHING part. Anyone disagrees with her mindset gets flamed all the way around, One word for ppl like her: IMMATURE, pure and simple.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago
@zephyrfalcon1966 Add to that the mulch that they say was untouched, when at the point of entry there was no mulch at all. Oh and the window sill being low enough to the ground at for an intruder NOT to disturb any "dust" that may have been there.
DantesBbyGrl07 11 months ago