So if the Earth has doubled in diameter, and the has been no subduction (or very little)- the interior of the Earth MUST be hollow or there must be massive hollow spaces.
So the next question is where are these hollow spaces- crust area or middle earth. (sorry frodo)
As the universe and Earth expands and cools: Mars chills, the Earth becomes new mars. Earth chills, Venus becomes new earth. Venus chills, Mercury becomes new Venus. Venus chills, the sun runs out of fuel, then burns out.
@JuniperGaze He mentions this in the lecture just pay more attention. Gases came from the core once the earth cracked open. Over time Hydrogen and Oxygen collected and created the oceans. This is why the Oceans were small during the Jurassic period as an example. More gases spewed out over the millions of years. I personally believe that at one point the smaller earth was covered in water hence why we find ocean fossils on land. Earth expanded which decreased the ocean levels due to larger circ.
The size of Jupiter? Earth becoming a gas giant? I don't think he's thought very hard about that one. A Venus like situation maybe but stick with what you know about what's happened in the past - it's safer!
What's also been forgotten is that the Earths crust is thinner than the shell of an egg and floats around like slag on molten Iron. Continents may fit better with a smaller and expanding earth theory, the fact that they get crushed skewed and distorted has been completely forgotten.
Another question: why earth begun to inflate only after the permian and not before.? Does earth spread in relationship with universe acceleration??Or as by youtube BBC video THE DAY THE EARTH NEARLY DIED (and metheor and relative extintion) has something to do with earth consecutive developpment?
This also explains, how dinosaur came to antarctica. I'm sure that if we would look for fossiles in the antarctica, we will see that this continent was once entirely tropical.
the thing is,i got tought that The 'age of 'fishes' was in the paleozoic period, aprox 250 to 550 million years ago. we know this by carbon dating fossils(apparently). In his theory, ther were no seas and very little water!!!!!
I think that it was almost all under water at that time that why you find fossils of fish up in the mountains 250 to 550 million years ago no dinos or mammals or birds just sea animals.
Well this is actually somewhat curious to me. Because if the expanding earth theory is correct, which it appears very much to be given the evidence, then that would also mean that the earth is now something like 90% less dense than it originally was. And yet the crust is very hard very dense rock.
I know we take on board a lot of space ice each year. Ice turns out to be one of the most common substances in otherwise empty space.
But where all the rock comes from is anyone's guess.
That's your theory. (One should be very careful using terms like "Always" & "Never")
Many show the Earth DID in fact increase in mass. Thus in the past, when the planet was a quarter of the current size, gravity was a quarter of the current size.
^This is why the dinosaurs could grow to such massive size.
Perhaps in OUR CURRENT gravity, T-Rexes would have be slow (and thus be a scavenger) -- but on a planet with less gravity, they would be as agile as a lion. (and thus be a predator)
To get a quarter more mass (only with this explanation gravity could increase) a huge metheor for the lacking quarter should have hit the earth!!!!! If earth only expands for inside pression should not change its gravity. OR???
and instead of orbiting where it is now it was crossing the belt.
That would account for the heavy crust of granite
Where the ocean submerged to protect ocean life
But the crust would be like a cemetery because much of life would have impacted by asteroid and floated to the surface where it remained fossilized in the newly formed crust.
Slowly the water retreated until the planet resembled Mars (void of topwater)
@dinner4me: No seas? Of couse there have been seas. Small but quite deep ones. The fossil data doesn't tell anything about how much water there was, where the water was at the time the species eveovled, nor how big the population of the found species was. But because this thesis is more logical, you shouldn't find any fossiles on the ocean floor it existed. And I think this is correct.
One comment. Use an Earth model that looks, you know, like earth. The earth isn't pink. I was getting a headache just trying to see what was what. Im not denying this theory. I actually thinks its true. Just use BETTER graphics when modeling it.
Yeah he needs better models he should have been more prepared. I wish this guy was a better speaker! Its hard for me to understand what he is saying. Neal Adams is a good speaker and his videos are amazing!
It could give answers to: if the Universe is finite or not; if yes, how celestial objects react to the ever increasing expansion of Universe at an accelerating rate; possibly the future of the Universe and matter.
I haven't watched past part 6 yet, but remember that E=MC^2. If energy (solar, cosmic particles, etc.) can be somehow transfered into mass then that would give hints to how the planets' radius and mass can increase, or decrease.
It could give answers to: if the Universe is infinite or not; if yes -- how celestial objects, matter react to the ever increasing expansion of Universe at an accelerating rate; possibly the future of the Universe and matter.
I haven't watched past part 6 yet, but remember that E=MC^2. If energy (solar, cosmic particles, etc.) can be somehow converted into mass then that would give hints to how the planets' radius and mass can increase, or decrease. Earth's core = dynamo machine.
The Universe is infinite. Look into Nassim Haramein's work in physics. He's actually found The Grand Unified Field Theory that explains almost everything. Better quantum physics.
Question
Why hasnt it been pointed out that if earth has been rifting for 4.5 billion years the earth would have been covered over 15 times
If water is released at 15 20 percent of the volume in basalt
Earth should be completely engulfed in water since subduction does not allow growth of the basin.
TheMadhybrid 3 months ago
Makes sense cause almost everything in life grows and expands, just like the universe. It's part of life.
dellpartspeople 9 months ago 2
So if the Earth has doubled in diameter, and the has been no subduction (or very little)- the interior of the Earth MUST be hollow or there must be massive hollow spaces.
So the next question is where are these hollow spaces- crust area or middle earth. (sorry frodo)
kaderoder 1 year ago
Comment removed
CassiusChrysanthe 1 year ago
@kaderoder If fact the center is probably growing too. Just like cells multiply, the inner core has to have a growing cycle of life too.
dellpartspeople 9 months ago
As the universe and Earth expands and cools: Mars chills, the Earth becomes new mars. Earth chills, Venus becomes new earth. Venus chills, Mercury becomes new Venus. Venus chills, the sun runs out of fuel, then burns out.
johnsconstruction116 1 year ago
@johnsconstruction116 all planets are gravitating toward the sun
Angular momentum increases the closer a planet approaches the sun
Mars is exactly the size Earth would be if the ocean basin was omitted
It also has a 24 hour rotation
and 24 degree tilt in axis (four seasons like Earth)
Mars as it grows will increase surface speed and drop in inclination
once Mars reaches the size of Earth it will also be at the same distance Earth is from the sun now, including inclination.
TheMadhybrid 3 months ago
@JuniperGaze He mentions this in the lecture just pay more attention. Gases came from the core once the earth cracked open. Over time Hydrogen and Oxygen collected and created the oceans. This is why the Oceans were small during the Jurassic period as an example. More gases spewed out over the millions of years. I personally believe that at one point the smaller earth was covered in water hence why we find ocean fossils on land. Earth expanded which decreased the ocean levels due to larger circ.
ForbiddenArchaeology 1 year ago 2
@ForbiddenArchaeology is that why the oldest sea fossils are found not in the oceans but on land.
datzfast 1 year ago
The size of Jupiter? Earth becoming a gas giant? I don't think he's thought very hard about that one. A Venus like situation maybe but stick with what you know about what's happened in the past - it's safer!
What's also been forgotten is that the Earths crust is thinner than the shell of an egg and floats around like slag on molten Iron. Continents may fit better with a smaller and expanding earth theory, the fact that they get crushed skewed and distorted has been completely forgotten.
quatfro 1 year ago
Another question: why earth begun to inflate only after the permian and not before.? Does earth spread in relationship with universe acceleration??Or as by youtube BBC video THE DAY THE EARTH NEARLY DIED (and metheor and relative extintion) has something to do with earth consecutive developpment?
MsArgentana 1 year ago
Doctor James, what do you think about youtube "snow ball earth" video?? Tks
Claudia
MsArgentana 1 year ago
This also explains, how dinosaur came to antarctica. I'm sure that if we would look for fossiles in the antarctica, we will see that this continent was once entirely tropical.
WolYou 2 years ago 2
the thing is,i got tought that The 'age of 'fishes' was in the paleozoic period, aprox 250 to 550 million years ago. we know this by carbon dating fossils(apparently). In his theory, ther were no seas and very little water!!!!!
dinner4me 2 years ago
I think that it was almost all under water at that time that why you find fossils of fish up in the mountains 250 to 550 million years ago no dinos or mammals or birds just sea animals.
davidgran1967 2 years ago 2
Could it be that a Permian Earth was COMPLETELY underwater?
That would explain all the missing water.
The mass of this planet will always remain the same, no matter what happens or how old it is.
downundabruthahood 2 years ago
Maybe a Permian earth was COMPLETELY underwater. The Earth will ALWAYS have the same amount of mass, no matter how big/small it gets.
downundabruthahood 2 years ago
Well this is actually somewhat curious to me. Because if the expanding earth theory is correct, which it appears very much to be given the evidence, then that would also mean that the earth is now something like 90% less dense than it originally was. And yet the crust is very hard very dense rock.
I know we take on board a lot of space ice each year. Ice turns out to be one of the most common substances in otherwise empty space.
But where all the rock comes from is anyone's guess.
Individualism101 2 years ago
That's your theory. (One should be very careful using terms like "Always" & "Never")
Many show the Earth DID in fact increase in mass. Thus in the past, when the planet was a quarter of the current size, gravity was a quarter of the current size.
^This is why the dinosaurs could grow to such massive size.
Perhaps in OUR CURRENT gravity, T-Rexes would have be slow (and thus be a scavenger) -- but on a planet with less gravity, they would be as agile as a lion. (and thus be a predator)
GrandAbbot 1 year ago
@GrandAbbot
To get a quarter more mass (only with this explanation gravity could increase) a huge metheor for the lacking quarter should have hit the earth!!!!! If earth only expands for inside pression should not change its gravity. OR???
TKS FOR ANY COMMENT
MsArgentana 1 year ago
@downundabruthahood Maybe the earth was bombarded by asteroid
and instead of orbiting where it is now it was crossing the belt.
That would account for the heavy crust of granite
Where the ocean submerged to protect ocean life
But the crust would be like a cemetery because much of life would have impacted by asteroid and floated to the surface where it remained fossilized in the newly formed crust.
Slowly the water retreated until the planet resembled Mars (void of topwater)
until it rifts more
TheMadhybrid 3 months ago
Typical retard response to attack the theory. He is totally unaware that fish fossils are found on the continent.
Go away and think before you speak, dinner4 me.
ReligionOfSacrifice 2 years ago
@dinner4me: No seas? Of couse there have been seas. Small but quite deep ones. The fossil data doesn't tell anything about how much water there was, where the water was at the time the species eveovled, nor how big the population of the found species was. But because this thesis is more logical, you shouldn't find any fossiles on the ocean floor it existed. And I think this is correct.
WolYou 2 years ago
The fish that were this old were all found only on the continents -- Utah, Italy, China
and, yes... there were shallow seas over some of the continents when the world was smaller.
GrandAbbot 1 year ago
When looking in the oceans, they could not find a single fossil older than 70 million years old.
GrandAbbot 1 year ago
One comment. Use an Earth model that looks, you know, like earth. The earth isn't pink. I was getting a headache just trying to see what was what. Im not denying this theory. I actually thinks its true. Just use BETTER graphics when modeling it.
IDontKnowNorDoYou 3 years ago
Yeah he needs better models he should have been more prepared. I wish this guy was a better speaker! Its hard for me to understand what he is saying. Neal Adams is a good speaker and his videos are amazing!
wavepsychic 3 years ago
It could give answers to: if the Universe is finite or not; if yes, how celestial objects react to the ever increasing expansion of Universe at an accelerating rate; possibly the future of the Universe and matter.
I haven't watched past part 6 yet, but remember that E=MC^2. If energy (solar, cosmic particles, etc.) can be somehow transfered into mass then that would give hints to how the planets' radius and mass can increase, or decrease.
Edward1589 3 years ago
I love this theory, makes so much more sense then current tectonics theory, specially since physical evidence does not support tectonics.
gilgamesh1962 3 years ago 12
Magical isn't it, something awesome about hearing the history of the planet we all live on described in detail for the first time in human history...
stupidtreehugger 3 years ago
It could give answers to: if the Universe is infinite or not; if yes -- how celestial objects, matter react to the ever increasing expansion of Universe at an accelerating rate; possibly the future of the Universe and matter.
I haven't watched past part 6 yet, but remember that E=MC^2. If energy (solar, cosmic particles, etc.) can be somehow converted into mass then that would give hints to how the planets' radius and mass can increase, or decrease. Earth's core = dynamo machine.
Edward1589 3 years ago
The Universe is infinite. Look into Nassim Haramein's work in physics. He's actually found The Grand Unified Field Theory that explains almost everything. Better quantum physics.
Loveseekingmissile 3 years ago
Comment removed
CassiusChrysanthe 1 year ago
Pangaea finally explained correctly. By to PT.
dehilster 3 years ago 5
@dehilster Why? What did I do? Best regards, PT. :)
PracticalTheorist 1 year ago