My government told-me not to let the radical friends of terrorist CIA employees like the evil Australian non-Muslim substitute Osama Bin-Vanstone tell us stories that won't get posted on CNN or FOX or ABC or CBS or PBS or even DOD (Dumb Or Dumber) so when some puffed up crazy little psycho fcuk tries to tell me anything I'm going to wait until Dan Rather tells me it's true & Benny Hinn tells me to believe.
Darkside of the moon is a MASONIC FRATERNAL ORDER-TELLING YOU THE MOON IS ARTIFICIAL-IT IS HOLLOWED OUT-TOWED BY THE REPTILIAN RACE-BACKIN SUMERIA-AND ATLANTIS-THERE ARE PEOPLE LIVING IN BONDAGE THERE NOW-GOVERNMENT BASES-I CAN GO ON-PINK FLOYD HAS NO RIGHT TO THEIR MUSIC-THEY ARE PAWNS OF THE GAMES-DISTRACTING THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE-
Just one thing gives you pause? How about the identical scene of rocks on the terrain at different locations and on different days? The same rocks? Any modern day movie editor will allow you to compare scenes by the average person on an average computer. (something that was not foreseen in the appolo missions time.) Gotta Love that technology!
5:08 The Hubble space telescopes lenses, as powerful as they may be, cannot photograph the landing sites because if pointed at the moon the photographs distance from one end to another is about half a mile, you would need a telescope that could photograph about a quarter of a mile to see something. We have with the LRO. I suggest looking into it. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
@TheArchfiend Not back then, They had no rovers that could have gathered such a diverse selection of rocks. They would have needed a powerful Motorized Arm on the rover, The robotics of the day were just not advanced enough for a little 5 foot rover to pick up a 10 pound moon rock. If you ever looked into the Moon Landings with great detail you would know that Apollo 15 - 17 gathered rocks with a slightly different chemical and physical make up from each other. I am not a dimwit.
You've figured out the reason for this since 2008 right? I'm not saying this in a "you're an idiot!" sort of way, just interested since the video title hasn't been updated (if possible), nor if there an 'update' video or text update in the description..
I did see the "Ultra Cloe-up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site" photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter so at this point you DO know they exist.
If any part of your question remains it's why did it take so long? See pt. 2
There used to be a good video of thiSince everything else doesn't even 'debunked.' Absolute trash like "There are no stars."
There are no stars for the same reason that we don't see stars as well in the city as the country, and the same reason we don't see stars during the day time. It's too bright.
The sun was shining on the moon directly, without any atmosphere or anything to break it up (which is why it looks 'black' still) so they had to turn the film sensitivity WAY down.
I realize you probably know that but people don't. They take their limited knowledge of science and assume that their 'common sense' approach can work for comlex science.
If photography and optics were that simple we would have discovered it at least 1000 years earlier than we did. Don't you think NASA would have remembered to put stars in the photo?
I'm pretty sure they ESPECIALLY would had they wanted to fake it.
Also, why wouldn't Russia try to claim we didn't make it? They were
in the race at the time and arguably winning it. Had they had proof or the chance to take away the victory from us, they definitely would have. And if you think they would even POSSIBLY be in on it, then you are CRAZY.
We did a dangerous.. pretty fucking stupidly risky mission to launch the equivilent of a floating metal box into space (compared to todays technology) and succeeded because of YEARS of training. Apollo 8 flew around the moon, Apollo 9 practiced docking techniques,
Not to mention we went to the moon multiple times. Amateur radio enthusists could pinpoint and listen to the transmissions and had to point it based off complex math toward the current location of the craft and had to adjust it based on it's movement. If we faked all that and got literally hundreds of thousands of people in on it it would have been EASIER just to have actually done it.
@LanIost When they were travelling through the shadow of the moon, the sun was not visible, so you'd think they see one or two trillion stars out the window.
How man times you heard some old jewish man or woman complain. How come they can put a man on the moon and amd they cant make a car that gets 50 mpg or they can put a man on the moon and they cant make a coffee maker thats makes good coffee or they can put a man on the moon but they cant make a TV in the US that gets a good picture 50 Miles from the TV station. COme on people.
Let me help you decide--"Radiation," they couldn't have taken pictues on the Moon because of it, the film would have been ruined. Man could not have survived the radiation of the Van Allen Rad. belts between Earth and the Moon. Those suits could not have protected man from the Radiation, the extreme temperatures, and or, deliver Oxygen at the same time.
Good point, why not focus Hubble on those sites and end the debate---You forgot to mention the Land Rovers that they left.
@billy38010 Film was in metal boxes that protected it against radiation, Dr Van Allen himself said that the belts would not be a hazard to the astronauts, who are you? what extreme temperature? same suits provide Oxygen for space walkers today, Hubble cannot "see" objects that small, LRO has taken pictures of landing sites.
@musicbruv The Hassleblad Camera had no special coating for solar radiation, think X-Rays. The suits were "Not" space suits, they were basically rubber with a thin coating of aluminum. The Moon's temperature varies from -153 to 107 deg. Celsius...0 is freezing & 100 is the boiling point of water--it changes instantaneously from light to shade. The "Spacesuit" had to control instant heating and cooling and oxygen, what protected the Spaceman's head--all on a battery from 1969.
@billy38010 X-ray levels in space are low and would have trouble penertrating steel, temps you quoted are SURFACE temps, Apollo astros went during the lunar morn when this temp was 60-70 c, as there is no atmosphere on the moon there is nothing to heat up, a vaccum cannot be hot or cold. the space suit only had to deal with the astros body heat as it was white and reflected any heat radiation from the sun. Space suits had 9 layers look it up, battery was 300 watt hours good for 1 EVA
@musicbruv 60 to 70C = 140-153F, We are protected from cosmic and solar radiation on Earth, Astronauts are not, neither is "Film," metal boxes can not protect film from the extreme INSTANT temperature changes, nor can humans and film be protected from cosmic and solar radiation from the moons surface--Let alone traveling 1st through the V.A. radiation belt. Dont forget later forays to the moon were of far longer durations on the surface. If I'm wrong prove it!!!
@billy38010 You obviously dont understand the science, the camera is in a vacuum and a vacuum has no mass so there is nothing to heat up or cool down, the only heat the camera is exposed to is radiated from the sun, this is easily reflected by the white coating on the camera, they did NOT pass through the V.A belts they skirted the edge of the belts, what levels of radiation are present on the moon? if we did not go to the moon them why did you make the "later forays" statement?
@musicbruv The camera & film and human are exposed to Cosmic Rays, i.e. X-Ray's for "21 hr's & 31 min.", while on the Moon, effect was little understood at the time! Quote: Buz Aldrin-"No temp. difference in suit between sunlight & shade--He then said, his head felt warmer in Sunlight" OK, 21+ hrs.is "How Hot."
--Later flights, maybe?----One Astronaut said "I looked back at that little "Pea" sized blue Planet--Earth is 4Xs Moon size..." All 3 men said, NO Stars were seen---ever"???
@billy38010 There was no temp difference in light and shade, of course not because the outside temp did not make any difference as there is NO atmosphere, the only difference would be on the SURFACE of the moon under their heat proof boots, head felt warmer because heat inside the suit rises!! no stars...of course not stars can only be seen if they are in complete darkness, eyes and camera cannot see dim stars in bright conditions. what levels od x rays are found on the moon?
@musicbruv Surface of the Moon is the same as the surface of a Space craft, of a Man or of a Camera, the difference between light and shade is 250 degrees, instant change, (IMO).
Stars- Are you saying that Michael Collins-never-looked out of the Lunar Orbiter in that 21 hour period-What was he doing then?
What was protecting the head of the Moon Men-their communications Cap, even space-walkers today get space-sickness, just 200 mi. above Earth--It's called radiation exposure.
@billy38010 The surface temp was only 60-70 c the cam and the men were in a vacuum! they had a white coating which reflects radiated heat, about 90% , the camera case would get warm but then how does the heat reach the film? inside the camera is in a vacuum and heat cannot convect or conduct across a vacuum. Michael may have looked out of his window but if his crafts lights were on he would not see any stars outside. space sickness is like motion sickness nothing to do with radiation
@musicbruv Final Epilogue: Forget about the Science you think you know........Look up the Houston Astrodome (1966)...Get it....Astro--Dome....Houston...there seems to be a PROBLEM.....it's a Lie!
@billy38010 Its not the science I think I know it is the science I KNOW and understand, heat struggles to travel through a vacuum that is how a thermos flask works, white material or shiny material reflects heat radiation just like the inside of a thermos flask, you should try to understand this science then you will realise why your moon hoax claims are so easy to shoot down, this debate has not been about the moon landings but YOUR science which applies on Earth and it is WRONG.
When I was young I whole-heartedly believed that we landed on the moon- then I grew up. Have you ever seen any vids/pics/docs about the moon landing hoax? The conspiracy theorists' argument makes much more sense than any thing that the gov has force fed us all these years- especially Mythbusters. BTW, you are forgetting that this "landing" brought tons of MONEY to the gov via tax dollars! Look it up when you have time. Peace.
If you always have doubt, then you'll always be an idiot! Pictures of a round Earth from space does not stop flat Earthers, so what would pictures from the 6 difference lunar landing sites accomplish?
BTW, earth orbit satellites 200 miles up have an easier time photographing the Earth than 12.5 million square miles of the moon some 250,000 miles away.
No it hasnt "rained in the last 30 to 40 years"...lol check out the Laser reflector that WAS PLACED ON THE MOON.. and STILL RETURNS SIGNALS to this day;can measure distance to the moon in inches You answered your own question when you said you could see a detailed 1/4 mile crater... think... the items left on the moon are FEET... NOT MILES..
the goverment gives americans shit to eat ,, tells them its icecream , they smile and eat it all !!! HEY AMERICANS,, U GUYS ARE EATTING SHIT ! they answer , ARE U STUPID? WE ARE AMERICANS , WERE NUMBER 1,, THIS IS ICECREAM.
If you are subscribed to this man, please unsubscribe now. Don't watch anymore of his videos. Ignore him. No one can say anything this stupid and actually mean it. "Because I believe the government might have doctored photographs and created fake video of the first moon landing, I want them to give me photographs and video evidence the moon landing actually happened." I just saved everyone time watching this video.
@umopapisdn42 He doesn't trust the government when they say the moon landing video was real. Then he wants the government to give him video evidence or pictures for the moon landing today. They could more easily fake it today than back then so why bother asking? Plus, someone made a response video giving him exactly what he asked for not to mention he probably could have just looked on a search engine.
OMG he is actually stupid enough to ask why a telescope on earth can't take pictures of the Apollo equipment left behind on the moon this guy is an idiot.
@Blahblobify My guess is because the moon is actually very big and very far away and we have an atmosphere which blurs the tiny details. That is why we have telescopes in space.
I like what he has to say, it makes sense. I would love to see a close up of the Flag heck some lunar tracks from the rover would be nice, YET THERE ARE NONE. Thanks Archfiend.....
It's a shame that people in the year 2011 even have the slightest doubt on that. The scientific community does not feel obliged to show anything, not because there is little evidence, but because they have left that long behind. I suggest you do your research. I find this video slightly insulting. In other words, not my fault if you burned a few brain cells watching Discovery channel all day buddy. :)
@MrKwameR You ignorant idiot, there are no stars in the photo, because of the glare on the moon, and the camera was not that good, it was the 60s, what do u expect, how can u fake a rocket going into space, and then fake the parachute into the ocean that the astronaughts did, I mean why would they build an extremely expensive rocket, and then fake it, like wtf dud, think logically
@MrKwameR Thats exactly what a stupid person would have said, so you have just proved my point by saying that, cos u are an idiot, logic is what all humans need to figure out what things are real, and what things are fake, and since u have no logic whatsoever, then you are obviously wrong
@MrKwameR im pretty sure ur the brainwashed one if u still think it was fake just because the stars did not show up in the photo, not even the astronaughts could see the stars while they were on the moon, im sorry to say this, but you lose
@Harrywwebeltman there's more to it than that you dumb moron, but you refuse to consider any other POV, thus proving how stupid and irrevocably brainwashed you are.
@MrKwameR ok, if u know more than me, enlighten me with the facts, and if u can't then u are stupid, go on, see if u can make me believe in ur nonsense
@Harrywwebeltman as I said idiot, look up David Percy, they deal with some physical evidence, so start there, otherwise STFU as you're boring me to tears you dull moron.
@MrKwameR I looked up david percy and he is a bigger idiot than u, so thnx for nothing, I hope one day u will come to your senses and realise what an idiot you are, hopefully that will happen when u realise david percy is an idiot, ahh but I guess u are too brainwashed to know
@MrKwameR you can't conduct a reasonable discussion because your side of the discussion is invalid evidence, that makes no sense whatsoever, and are just stupid, ignorant claims, to try and say america faked it, well im sorry to say, that you and david percy both have something in common, you guys are wrong, and thats all there is to it, stop trying, you are getting no where, there is more evidence for the moon landing bieng real than it bieng a hoax
@Harrywwebeltman look stupid, if you won't read or can't understand what Percy's saying, then of course no reasonable discussion can occur as you're either oblivious or retarded.
It doesn't even sound like a 60's camera could operate on the Moon with it's temp range between -180 and then back to 180.....as was described, it's like freezing the cam and the microwaving it and expecting it to work.
@MrKwameR They made the camera especially for the moon they didn't take a normal camera up there u stupid retarded fuck who still thinks it was a hoax when most people know the real truth unlike u who can't seem to learn anything new other than what mr gay percy has told him, u really need to give up, i mean this is just getting ridiculous, I have never met someone as stupid as u before, and I hope never to, because all the scientists in the world will call you stupid, and shall laugh cos u are
@MrKwameR well it did withstand the range of temp, cos they did land on the moon, and they did film it, if it was a hoax, then where was it filmed, explain that, if u cannot prove where it was filmed other than the moon, then u have no say in the argument
@MrKwameR says the guy who still believes it was a hoax, even the scientists of the world weren't blinded by people like you, poor little hoax believer, all alone, too stupid to realise the truth, going against scientists and astronauts the world over, poor little hoax believer, I think you need a father figure in your life so u can stop bieng a stupid little ignorant bastard, its ok, you will eventually realise, we are all here to help
Hey Math is Hard guy - to get needed resolution 0.43m (like good spy-satellite), lunar-probe must has mirror 15 cm only on altitude 20 km(resolution of the telescope formula). Moon hasn't atmosphere therefor probe may go down almost to the surface. What problems?
Saturn-V threw to the moon almost 50 tons 10 times, but now probe with mass 100 kg it's problem. Тhis is so?
Are hundreds of people in on the scam of the century, and kept their mouths shut dispite the fame and fortune of going to the press in America???? Na, probably just landed on the moon. The internet is a playgound for people who dont understand human nature.
American people will start panicking if our government release files about aliens. America! Your brave enough to fight in wars? But not brave enough to meet our creators?
With photoshop I could fake images of our landers on the moon or video. I could do it here with my software, so what makes you think anything like that would convince anyone?
that's one of the big things that i think about every time this topic comes up. we can take photos of things light years away in perfect resolution why can't we just take one of the surface of the moon. it seems a little ridiculous to me.
in 1969 the USA did not have good engines for rockets ! The USA could not fly on moon in the 2011 USA buy at Russia old engines and it means that the USA does not have the engines ! in 1969 the USA did not have necessary engines !
Says the guy who lives in a country with probably the biggest streak of false propaganda in the history of man-kind. I don't know who feeds you this "the engines were not good" crap, it's just wrong. We had very good engines. These engines were strong enough to take us into deep space, which is something that the Russians could not do and they even admitted it.
We bought engines from russia? What kind of backwards ass history book did you read that from? We had sufficient engines even before Russia started their space program. Russia wouldn't of had rockets if it weren't for the U.S.
there's no point if nasa took the picture, coz they can just fake it and there's no way to prove it, and people will say they faked it. the mythbuster debunked some less than a quarter of the evidence i saw here in Youtube i think, and they picked only the easy ones,or at least not the one i want them to debunk.
You sound like a whiney little bitch. Who gives a shit what you think about the lunar landings. You're obviously a sceptic who needs to have his every concern backed up by more and more evidence, regardless of the fact the landings most certainly took place. However, if you need contemporary proof of the actual landings, start with the photography from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
" Regarding the Apollo missions I'm NOT sure these men walked on the Moon" says Mr B.O' Leary the NASA scientist who was a scientific adviser of the Apollo program and astronaut himself.
1. You think the lunar module landed in the ocean!? It was abandoned near the moon. Armstrong and Aldrin transferred to the Command Module. where Michael Collins was waiting for them in orbit around the moon.
2. There was no fly in the Lunar Module because the oxygen was vented.
3, The pictures of the six landing sites can be found if you google the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Your besserwisser attitude is irritating, after all the Moon is 380 000 km away!
Because there is overwhelming evidence against Apollo and the moon landings and the whole world is aware of this NASA are shit-scared to try and prove otherwise because it can't. So it probably believes that to protect their image and the status quo idiots like us can continue 'til we're blue in the face to argue amongst one another while they continue to sap the economy with money wasted on useless and fruitless projects. Your loss usa.
The Moon landing was a hoax.Wherever you are in this planet you entitled and you have every right to protest about the so called "moon landing" as the criminals of NASA used (and capitalized) on the very concept of mankind within their moon fraud, and don't forget the murders they did.
Send your emails to UN and USA foreign office asking for an official investigation of the Moon landing fraud.
"Did the United States FAKE Landing on the Moon???"
Yes. Yes, they did.
It is very obvious that ALL Apollo "landings" were faked, studio filmed, airbrushed, and their endless anomalies and auto-docked cameras, video-graphic anomalies, odd and fake rock distribution to some countries verified, color formatting fails have been verified, 32,000 photos and not even 1/10th released.
Strange enough?
I believe there weren't even any more photos than the ones that SEEMED real enough to publicize.
@firefirefuneralpyre but then wouldnt hat mean the other side of the world would see the other side because you said when were sleeping, umm theres always some part of the world sleeping. i was just trying to say they dont know exact spot so it might be a little hard on top of we dont even know if are side we see is the right side
But with this the USA bought the Russians telescope of over 1 billion dollars to by the telescope and they even went to that extent of bringing the guy the built it to America and most of the materials.
Go on youtube and search "Lunar Legacy" it debunks every moon hoax claim. It will reveal to you that all that "proof" you have been told, is all bullshit. We went to the moon. Simple fact.
I know this is an old video, but this guy really does make sense. Its a really pleasant change to listen to someone who does believe the moon landing happened, yet STILL questions the "official storyline". You really did get your point across.
@shagster1970 Not very convincing. You could say they doctored the images. The pictures are too high to really prove anything to be honest. I think most people don't doubt we went to the moon it's just you get called an idiot or dumb for simply asking questions. What if part of the Apollo mission were staged! So no one thinks the images are too perfect and landing on the moon that many times with no deaths or incidents is not questionable. It's history so why disbelieve it.
If we didn't land on the moon some other country would have called us out already. They all have telescopes too.
sugarpsycho 5 days ago
@TheArchfiend Do you think 9/11 was a inside job?
MegaYeshua33 6 days ago
Was that a poster of Kurt Cobain (as a child) behind you?
Janim8282 3 weeks ago
they did not fake it! get over it, it's a good thing! isn't it?
eyesdirect100 1 month ago
at first glance I thought his shirt read Meth Head
scout663 1 month ago
fuck you it was fake
lenege4 1 month ago
@lenege4 No it wasn't fuck mouth, they put a a laser reflector on the moon..to show the distance between the moon and earth. It still works too
Atheieye 1 month ago
This is a great example of non-critical thinking folks.....probably believes in magic
staIkervisions 1 month ago
your annoying
jonniekees 1 month ago
LRO has answered the lot:)
andschannll 1 month ago
popsci( dot )com/technology/article/2011-09/new-nasa-photos-show-footprints-moon
peefied 1 month ago
In your patience possess-ye your (Own) souls... (Some Jew called Christ)
spacelizardlaw 1 month ago
Fcuk the facts...
I'm an AMERICAN patriot man...
I'm a proud AMERICAN & I-love the flag...
My government told-me not to let the radical friends of terrorist CIA employees like the evil Australian non-Muslim substitute Osama Bin-Vanstone tell us stories that won't get posted on CNN or FOX or ABC or CBS or PBS or even DOD (Dumb Or Dumber) so when some puffed up crazy little psycho fcuk tries to tell me anything I'm going to wait until Dan Rather tells me it's true & Benny Hinn tells me to believe.
spacelizardlaw 1 month ago
Apparently there are beings living inside of it, even now. Its use was for practical reasons to be able to
have a “moon base” in close proximity to monitor and adjust the magnetic fields of the planet.
SmklookinGlass 2 months ago
Moon is an artificial satellite towed here many eons ago to be used as a Reptilian
and Grey base From the Guardian perspective our moon is an inorganic
structure and is artificial, and did not come from our solar system.
It was brought here during the last war between the Pleadians and Reptilians.
The moon is a craft stolen from war and stripped to be refitted for its current use as a Reptilian and Grey Alien base.
SmklookinGlass 2 months ago
Darkside of the moon is a MASONIC FRATERNAL ORDER-TELLING YOU THE MOON IS ARTIFICIAL-IT IS HOLLOWED OUT-TOWED BY THE REPTILIAN RACE-BACKIN SUMERIA-AND ATLANTIS-THERE ARE PEOPLE LIVING IN BONDAGE THERE NOW-GOVERNMENT BASES-I CAN GO ON-PINK FLOYD HAS NO RIGHT TO THEIR MUSIC-THEY ARE PAWNS OF THE GAMES-DISTRACTING THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE-
SmklookinGlass 2 months ago
@SmklookinGlass Then why are there pictures of the dark side of the moon?
tyfleguitar1987 1 month ago
this link does not work google took the video down
mcdonald1958 2 months ago
Just one thing gives you pause? How about the identical scene of rocks on the terrain at different locations and on different days? The same rocks? Any modern day movie editor will allow you to compare scenes by the average person on an average computer. (something that was not foreseen in the appolo missions time.) Gotta Love that technology!
asalamulekum 2 months ago
How can you have doubt about the moon landing yet have none when considering the 911 attacks. There is a lot more evidence for the latter.
chillywilly541 2 months ago
nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/lroc-20110906-skimming.html
Finnstudios 2 months ago
5:08 The Hubble space telescopes lenses, as powerful as they may be, cannot photograph the landing sites because if pointed at the moon the photographs distance from one end to another is about half a mile, you would need a telescope that could photograph about a quarter of a mile to see something. We have with the LRO. I suggest looking into it. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Finnstudios 2 months ago
2:04 The Rocks are the proof.
Finnstudios 2 months ago
@Finnstudios
LOL!! Yeah.. there is no possible way an unmanned rover could have gathered those rocks, dimwit.
TheArchfiend 2 months ago
@TheArchfiend Not back then, They had no rovers that could have gathered such a diverse selection of rocks. They would have needed a powerful Motorized Arm on the rover, The robotics of the day were just not advanced enough for a little 5 foot rover to pick up a 10 pound moon rock. If you ever looked into the Moon Landings with great detail you would know that Apollo 15 - 17 gathered rocks with a slightly different chemical and physical make up from each other. I am not a dimwit.
Finnstudios 2 months ago
@TheArchfiend You are annoying and irrelevant.
How's I get here in mediocrity-ville' ?
staIkervisions 1 month ago
@TheArchfiend Is that a child picture of Kurt Cobain in the background?
FeneGrenkle 1 week ago
we've been. the majority of the footage was shot here on earth. they couldn't show you what's really on the moon
AccountabilityBurns 2 months ago
@Thearchfield:
You've figured out the reason for this since 2008 right? I'm not saying this in a "you're an idiot!" sort of way, just interested since the video title hasn't been updated (if possible), nor if there an 'update' video or text update in the description..
I did see the "Ultra Cloe-up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site" photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter so at this point you DO know they exist.
If any part of your question remains it's why did it take so long? See pt. 2
LanIost 2 months ago
There used to be a good video of thiSince everything else doesn't even 'debunked.' Absolute trash like "There are no stars."
There are no stars for the same reason that we don't see stars as well in the city as the country, and the same reason we don't see stars during the day time. It's too bright.
The sun was shining on the moon directly, without any atmosphere or anything to break it up (which is why it looks 'black' still) so they had to turn the film sensitivity WAY down.
LanIost 2 months ago
I realize you probably know that but people don't. They take their limited knowledge of science and assume that their 'common sense' approach can work for comlex science.
If photography and optics were that simple we would have discovered it at least 1000 years earlier than we did. Don't you think NASA would have remembered to put stars in the photo?
I'm pretty sure they ESPECIALLY would had they wanted to fake it.
Also, why wouldn't Russia try to claim we didn't make it? They were
LanIost 2 months ago
in the race at the time and arguably winning it. Had they had proof or the chance to take away the victory from us, they definitely would have. And if you think they would even POSSIBLY be in on it, then you are CRAZY.
We did a dangerous.. pretty fucking stupidly risky mission to launch the equivilent of a floating metal box into space (compared to todays technology) and succeeded because of YEARS of training. Apollo 8 flew around the moon, Apollo 9 practiced docking techniques,
LanIost 2 months ago
Not to mention we went to the moon multiple times. Amateur radio enthusists could pinpoint and listen to the transmissions and had to point it based off complex math toward the current location of the craft and had to adjust it based on it's movement. If we faked all that and got literally hundreds of thousands of people in on it it would have been EASIER just to have actually done it.
Oh yeah, hes a great link.
LanIost 2 months ago
Great link of why we can't see the lunar lander, flag, etc from here on Earth with ANY telescope check out:
bit (dot) ly (slash) 17tg4g
[ special thanks to youtube for not allowing links, they must be in on the conspiracy eh? ;-) ]
The reason will have you smacking your had with a '"ohhh" when you read it. It's as simple as the stars issue if you know math.
Also the moon is still getting hit by meteorites, just like the Earth, In fact, much more since it has no atmosphere to stop it
LanIost 2 months ago
@LanIost When they were travelling through the shadow of the moon, the sun was not visible, so you'd think they see one or two trillion stars out the window.
ThePurpleHarpoon 2 months ago
How man times you heard some old jewish man or woman complain. How come they can put a man on the moon and amd they cant make a car that gets 50 mpg or they can put a man on the moon and they cant make a coffee maker thats makes good coffee or they can put a man on the moon but they cant make a TV in the US that gets a good picture 50 Miles from the TV station. COme on people.
websuspect 2 months ago
hahaha what a nice question & answer piece...
Efjayslim 3 months ago in playlist moon landing
watch the mythbusters episode :P
mopman100 4 months ago 2
what I ('67') don't get is why would you fake a moon landing. its pointless :/
VermilionOfficial 4 months ago
Let me help you decide--"Radiation," they couldn't have taken pictues on the Moon because of it, the film would have been ruined. Man could not have survived the radiation of the Van Allen Rad. belts between Earth and the Moon. Those suits could not have protected man from the Radiation, the extreme temperatures, and or, deliver Oxygen at the same time.
Good point, why not focus Hubble on those sites and end the debate---You forgot to mention the Land Rovers that they left.
It was faked!!!
billy38010 4 months ago 2
@billy38010 Film was in metal boxes that protected it against radiation, Dr Van Allen himself said that the belts would not be a hazard to the astronauts, who are you? what extreme temperature? same suits provide Oxygen for space walkers today, Hubble cannot "see" objects that small, LRO has taken pictures of landing sites.
musicbruv 3 months ago
@musicbruv The Hassleblad Camera had no special coating for solar radiation, think X-Rays. The suits were "Not" space suits, they were basically rubber with a thin coating of aluminum. The Moon's temperature varies from -153 to 107 deg. Celsius...0 is freezing & 100 is the boiling point of water--it changes instantaneously from light to shade. The "Spacesuit" had to control instant heating and cooling and oxygen, what protected the Spaceman's head--all on a battery from 1969.
billy38010 3 months ago
@billy38010 X-ray levels in space are low and would have trouble penertrating steel, temps you quoted are SURFACE temps, Apollo astros went during the lunar morn when this temp was 60-70 c, as there is no atmosphere on the moon there is nothing to heat up, a vaccum cannot be hot or cold. the space suit only had to deal with the astros body heat as it was white and reflected any heat radiation from the sun. Space suits had 9 layers look it up, battery was 300 watt hours good for 1 EVA
musicbruv 3 months ago
@musicbruv 60 to 70C = 140-153F, We are protected from cosmic and solar radiation on Earth, Astronauts are not, neither is "Film," metal boxes can not protect film from the extreme INSTANT temperature changes, nor can humans and film be protected from cosmic and solar radiation from the moons surface--Let alone traveling 1st through the V.A. radiation belt. Dont forget later forays to the moon were of far longer durations on the surface. If I'm wrong prove it!!!
billy38010 3 months ago
@billy38010 You obviously dont understand the science, the camera is in a vacuum and a vacuum has no mass so there is nothing to heat up or cool down, the only heat the camera is exposed to is radiated from the sun, this is easily reflected by the white coating on the camera, they did NOT pass through the V.A belts they skirted the edge of the belts, what levels of radiation are present on the moon? if we did not go to the moon them why did you make the "later forays" statement?
musicbruv 3 months ago
@musicbruv The camera & film and human are exposed to Cosmic Rays, i.e. X-Ray's for "21 hr's & 31 min.", while on the Moon, effect was little understood at the time! Quote: Buz Aldrin-"No temp. difference in suit between sunlight & shade--He then said, his head felt warmer in Sunlight" OK, 21+ hrs.is "How Hot."
--Later flights, maybe?----One Astronaut said "I looked back at that little "Pea" sized blue Planet--Earth is 4Xs Moon size..." All 3 men said, NO Stars were seen---ever"???
billy38010 3 months ago
@billy38010 There was no temp difference in light and shade, of course not because the outside temp did not make any difference as there is NO atmosphere, the only difference would be on the SURFACE of the moon under their heat proof boots, head felt warmer because heat inside the suit rises!! no stars...of course not stars can only be seen if they are in complete darkness, eyes and camera cannot see dim stars in bright conditions. what levels od x rays are found on the moon?
musicbruv 3 months ago
@musicbruv Surface of the Moon is the same as the surface of a Space craft, of a Man or of a Camera, the difference between light and shade is 250 degrees, instant change, (IMO).
Stars- Are you saying that Michael Collins-never-looked out of the Lunar Orbiter in that 21 hour period-What was he doing then?
What was protecting the head of the Moon Men-their communications Cap, even space-walkers today get space-sickness, just 200 mi. above Earth--It's called radiation exposure.
billy38010 3 months ago
@billy38010 The surface temp was only 60-70 c the cam and the men were in a vacuum! they had a white coating which reflects radiated heat, about 90% , the camera case would get warm but then how does the heat reach the film? inside the camera is in a vacuum and heat cannot convect or conduct across a vacuum. Michael may have looked out of his window but if his crafts lights were on he would not see any stars outside. space sickness is like motion sickness nothing to do with radiation
musicbruv 3 months ago
@musicbruv Final Epilogue: Forget about the Science you think you know........Look up the Houston Astrodome (1966)...Get it....Astro--Dome....Houston...there seems to be a PROBLEM.....it's a Lie!
billy38010 3 months ago
@billy38010 Its not the science I think I know it is the science I KNOW and understand, heat struggles to travel through a vacuum that is how a thermos flask works, white material or shiny material reflects heat radiation just like the inside of a thermos flask, you should try to understand this science then you will realise why your moon hoax claims are so easy to shoot down, this debate has not been about the moon landings but YOUR science which applies on Earth and it is WRONG.
musicbruv 3 months ago
When I was young I whole-heartedly believed that we landed on the moon- then I grew up. Have you ever seen any vids/pics/docs about the moon landing hoax? The conspiracy theorists' argument makes much more sense than any thing that the gov has force fed us all these years- especially Mythbusters. BTW, you are forgetting that this "landing" brought tons of MONEY to the gov via tax dollars! Look it up when you have time. Peace.
drla02 4 months ago
or maybe the technology is confedetial
born2love6 4 months ago
maybe it was on the dark side
born2love6 4 months ago
No.
StarDustSid 4 months ago
didnt they just release the pics real recently?
JULESRULES9969 5 months ago
I would love to listen to his points,but the Cobain Poster is just too distracting!
AnarchyDeathHate666 5 months ago
@jackdeath
He is obviously talking about a satellite made to take pictures of objects in space. For example, the Hubble Telescope.
MrIhatethoring 5 months ago
If you always have doubt, then you'll always be an idiot! Pictures of a round Earth from space does not stop flat Earthers, so what would pictures from the 6 difference lunar landing sites accomplish?
BTW, earth orbit satellites 200 miles up have an easier time photographing the Earth than 12.5 million square miles of the moon some 250,000 miles away.
jackdeath 6 months ago
Idiot.
sinclair61 6 months ago
It's a bit creepy that you've got a big ass kiddie picture of Kurt...
madeyes4u 6 months ago
you forget one thing,how come one other contry haven't try to go the moon and why Amstrong avoinding the media SO MUCH
GamerRangerX 6 months ago
i dont know...but if they did go there...theres a reason they never went back
jj1x0 6 months ago in playlist Favorites #2
I love your poster with baby Kurt Cobain
razvyIV96 6 months ago
No it hasnt "rained in the last 30 to 40 years"...lol check out the Laser reflector that WAS PLACED ON THE MOON.. and STILL RETURNS SIGNALS to this day;can measure distance to the moon in inches You answered your own question when you said you could see a detailed 1/4 mile crater... think... the items left on the moon are FEET... NOT MILES..
swin27you 7 months ago
the goverment gives americans shit to eat ,, tells them its icecream , they smile and eat it all !!! HEY AMERICANS,, U GUYS ARE EATTING SHIT ! they answer , ARE U STUPID? WE ARE AMERICANS , WERE NUMBER 1,, THIS IS ICECREAM.
felicidadehappy 7 months ago
"have doubt but still beleive " what a sheep!!!!!
saddleheadson 7 months ago
this dude said he dont and wont aggree with the facts hahahaha ppl tickle me
saddleheadson 7 months ago
Apollo 11: Uh... Houston, we have a ID 10 T error, please advise
Houston: Apollo please ignore, It's just a blip
prometheus882002 7 months ago
That American Flag was sure blowing in the wind! We never went to the moon, get REAL!!! Come on man!
ella5024 7 months ago
how do you know that russia (or wherever) isnt pissed and they didnt go up and sabotage us and get rid of the evidence? exactly.
pAjAk0INSANE 7 months ago
If you are subscribed to this man, please unsubscribe now. Don't watch anymore of his videos. Ignore him. No one can say anything this stupid and actually mean it. "Because I believe the government might have doctored photographs and created fake video of the first moon landing, I want them to give me photographs and video evidence the moon landing actually happened." I just saved everyone time watching this video.
RealisticParadoxes 7 months ago
@RealisticParadoxes
I might be completely retarted or just very tired (it's 3am) but how is what he's saying stupid?
umopapisdn42 7 months ago
@umopapisdn42 He doesn't trust the government when they say the moon landing video was real. Then he wants the government to give him video evidence or pictures for the moon landing today. They could more easily fake it today than back then so why bother asking? Plus, someone made a response video giving him exactly what he asked for not to mention he probably could have just looked on a search engine.
RealisticParadoxes 7 months ago
@RealisticParadoxes
Thank you! That is indeed retarted even though it made perfect sense to me at the time (haha). You are a gentleman and a scholar.
umopapisdn42 7 months ago
@RealisticParadoxes
OMG he is actually stupid enough to ask why a telescope on earth can't take pictures of the Apollo equipment left behind on the moon this guy is an idiot.
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@Blahblobify My guess is because the moon is actually very big and very far away and we have an atmosphere which blurs the tiny details. That is why we have telescopes in space.
RealisticParadoxes 7 months ago
@RealisticParadoxes Thanks
madeyes4u 6 months ago
I agree with you! Well done!
greenandyellow01 7 months ago
I like what he has to say, it makes sense. I would love to see a close up of the Flag heck some lunar tracks from the rover would be nice, YET THERE ARE NONE. Thanks Archfiend.....
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
It's a shame that people in the year 2011 even have the slightest doubt on that. The scientific community does not feel obliged to show anything, not because there is little evidence, but because they have left that long behind. I suggest you do your research. I find this video slightly insulting. In other words, not my fault if you burned a few brain cells watching Discovery channel all day buddy. :)
VonManavis 7 months ago
@VonManavis STFU idiot
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR
Your mom rocks!
VonManavis 7 months ago
To answer your questions, no landing occurred, that explains all of your points....it also explains why there's no stars in some of the photo's.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR You ignorant idiot, there are no stars in the photo, because of the glare on the moon, and the camera was not that good, it was the 60s, what do u expect, how can u fake a rocket going into space, and then fake the parachute into the ocean that the astronaughts did, I mean why would they build an extremely expensive rocket, and then fake it, like wtf dud, think logically
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman fuck logic!!!!
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR Thats exactly what a stupid person would have said, so you have just proved my point by saying that, cos u are an idiot, logic is what all humans need to figure out what things are real, and what things are fake, and since u have no logic whatsoever, then you are obviously wrong
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman Search on youtube for David Percy you dimwitted fool.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR nah he is probably an idiot like u who still thinks its a hoax
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman LOL, great method of discourse idiot.
Stupid brainwashed fuck
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR im pretty sure ur the brainwashed one if u still think it was fake just because the stars did not show up in the photo, not even the astronaughts could see the stars while they were on the moon, im sorry to say this, but you lose
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman there's more to it than that you dumb moron, but you refuse to consider any other POV, thus proving how stupid and irrevocably brainwashed you are.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR ok, if u know more than me, enlighten me with the facts, and if u can't then u are stupid, go on, see if u can make me believe in ur nonsense
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman as I said idiot, look up David Percy, they deal with some physical evidence, so start there, otherwise STFU as you're boring me to tears you dull moron.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR I looked up david percy and he is a bigger idiot than u, so thnx for nothing, I hope one day u will come to your senses and realise what an idiot you are, hopefully that will happen when u realise david percy is an idiot, ahh but I guess u are too brainwashed to know
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman fuck off you mindless goat, you sound stupid and certainly act it.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR says the person who still think we didn't land on the moon
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman can't conduct a reasonable discussion with a stupid little turd, so fuck off deadshit
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR you can't conduct a reasonable discussion because your side of the discussion is invalid evidence, that makes no sense whatsoever, and are just stupid, ignorant claims, to try and say america faked it, well im sorry to say, that you and david percy both have something in common, you guys are wrong, and thats all there is to it, stop trying, you are getting no where, there is more evidence for the moon landing bieng real than it bieng a hoax
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman look stupid, if you won't read or can't understand what Percy's saying, then of course no reasonable discussion can occur as you're either oblivious or retarded.
It doesn't even sound like a 60's camera could operate on the Moon with it's temp range between -180 and then back to 180.....as was described, it's like freezing the cam and the microwaving it and expecting it to work.
Now fuck off as you really are a dense cunt.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR They made the camera especially for the moon they didn't take a normal camera up there u stupid retarded fuck who still thinks it was a hoax when most people know the real truth unlike u who can't seem to learn anything new other than what mr gay percy has told him, u really need to give up, i mean this is just getting ridiculous, I have never met someone as stupid as u before, and I hope never to, because all the scientists in the world will call you stupid, and shall laugh cos u are
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman didn't matter, they felt the cam couldn't withstand the huge range of temps, but you'll overlook that as you're a fucken moron.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR well it did withstand the range of temp, cos they did land on the moon, and they did film it, if it was a hoax, then where was it filmed, explain that, if u cannot prove where it was filmed other than the moon, then u have no say in the argument
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
@Harrywwebeltman fuck off idiot, I'm not going to allow a fucken dumbcunt to dictate terms to me.
You're just a brainwashed jerk, like many people, so you're in good company...stupid cunt.
MrKwameR 7 months ago
@MrKwameR says the guy who still believes it was a hoax, even the scientists of the world weren't blinded by people like you, poor little hoax believer, all alone, too stupid to realise the truth, going against scientists and astronauts the world over, poor little hoax believer, I think you need a father figure in your life so u can stop bieng a stupid little ignorant bastard, its ok, you will eventually realise, we are all here to help
Harrywwebeltman 7 months ago
beefy
silentalarm1990 7 months ago
This moron still has this video up!!
Teenager clambers for more attention.......lol
Tweekerhead 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey Math is Hard guy - to get needed resolution 0.43m (like good spy-satellite), lunar-probe must has mirror 15 cm only on altitude 20 km(resolution of the telescope formula). Moon hasn't atmosphere therefor probe may go down almost to the surface. What problems?
Saturn-V threw to the moon almost 50 tons 10 times, but now probe with mass 100 kg it's problem. Тhis is so?
fuckyorutube 7 months ago
Math is Hard guy !
fuckyorutube 7 months ago
Just don't tell Buzz Aldrin that we didn't go to the moon unless you want to get your ass kicked by an old man.
mrslash11 7 months ago
How can we prove any of it..That's why it's called brainwashing.
LottsaLasagna 7 months ago
Are hundreds of people in on the scam of the century, and kept their mouths shut dispite the fame and fortune of going to the press in America???? Na, probably just landed on the moon. The internet is a playgound for people who dont understand human nature.
1965guitarboy 8 months ago
American people will start panicking if our government release files about aliens. America! Your brave enough to fight in wars? But not brave enough to meet our creators?
H2HELP 8 months ago
With photoshop I could fake images of our landers on the moon or video. I could do it here with my software, so what makes you think anything like that would convince anyone?
batmmannn 8 months ago
Comment removed
metalWeirdo77 8 months ago
@metalWeirdo77
LOL No. It's Kurt Cobain.
TheArchfiend 8 months ago
@TheArchfiend
Well that's some cool Archfiend trivia!
metalWeirdo77 8 months ago
i know this is a shocker to alot of sheep but our government lies on an epic scale all the time, we never landed on the moon..
Smperk33 8 months ago
that's one of the big things that i think about every time this topic comes up. we can take photos of things light years away in perfect resolution why can't we just take one of the surface of the moon. it seems a little ridiculous to me.
pulpfiction2122 8 months ago
in 1969 the USA did not have good engines for rockets ! The USA could not fly on moon in the 2011 USA buy at Russia old engines and it means that the USA does not have the engines ! in 1969 the USA did not have necessary engines !
The USA it is a country of lie
Roofius2 8 months ago
@Roofius2-"The USA it is a country of lie"
Says the guy who lives in a country with probably the biggest streak of false propaganda in the history of man-kind. I don't know who feeds you this "the engines were not good" crap, it's just wrong. We had very good engines. These engines were strong enough to take us into deep space, which is something that the Russians could not do and they even admitted it.
dalek14mc 8 months ago
@dalek14mc If at you good engines
What for you buy engines in Russia?
Roofius2 8 months ago
@Roofius2-"What for you buy engines in Russia?"
We bought engines from russia? What kind of backwards ass history book did you read that from? We had sufficient engines even before Russia started their space program. Russia wouldn't of had rockets if it weren't for the U.S.
dalek14mc 8 months ago
there's no point if nasa took the picture, coz they can just fake it and there's no way to prove it, and people will say they faked it. the mythbuster debunked some less than a quarter of the evidence i saw here in Youtube i think, and they picked only the easy ones,or at least not the one i want them to debunk.
theprops 8 months ago
"I'm not an expert..."
No shit.
timpovikings 8 months ago
I love your shirts
MrYoshidude100 8 months ago
You sound like a whiney little bitch. Who gives a shit what you think about the lunar landings. You're obviously a sceptic who needs to have his every concern backed up by more and more evidence, regardless of the fact the landings most certainly took place. However, if you need contemporary proof of the actual landings, start with the photography from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Tapiola2007 8 months ago
"Apollo 11 half way to the Moon part 2"
- this short video means the end of the moonhoax conspiracy nonsense.
Rob260259 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" Regarding the Apollo missions I'm NOT sure these men walked on the Moon" says Mr B.O' Leary the NASA scientist who was a scientific adviser of the Apollo program and astronaut himself.
watch?v=lOyYZIW0zvY
potrodsas 8 months ago
i think the mythbusters did debunk the moon landing.Americans did land in the MOON .
chaksa 8 months ago
What is math?
Chev4206 8 months ago
@Chev4206 mathematics
domantasbogdanas 8 months ago
@domantasbogdanas Yes, so abbreviated is 'maths'. Needs an extra S
Chev4206 8 months ago
I think the more important question is: Why do you have a poster of a young Kurt Cobain?
mohnjarston 8 months ago
I heve see these guy, he worke at the piggly wiggly in my town ;-)
marshalllucky 8 months ago
@marshalllucky why do you meke so many gramatical errors?
domantasbogdanas 8 months ago
@stanoscepan there are images of the landing sites and you can see the stuff . have you been living under a rock?
derrick713 8 months ago
You believe they landed on the moon yet ask for evidence, a contradiction in terms. Idiot.
Chev4206 9 months ago
@stanoscepan If only there were more intelligent people like us....
Chev4206 9 months ago
It's "Maths"
wrytch 9 months ago
1. You think the lunar module landed in the ocean!? It was abandoned near the moon. Armstrong and Aldrin transferred to the Command Module. where Michael Collins was waiting for them in orbit around the moon.
2. There was no fly in the Lunar Module because the oxygen was vented.
3, The pictures of the six landing sites can be found if you google the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Your besserwisser attitude is irritating, after all the Moon is 380 000 km away!
Try to get a close-up yourself!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
remember this face, it is the face of the deceived
goodnoah 9 months ago
Show me the baloney!
globalmack 9 months ago
math is hard
ATMeteorites 9 months ago
I totally agree! I would love to see these photographs too!
mrwonderfulman2011 9 months ago
Because there is overwhelming evidence against Apollo and the moon landings and the whole world is aware of this NASA are shit-scared to try and prove otherwise because it can't. So it probably believes that to protect their image and the status quo idiots like us can continue 'til we're blue in the face to argue amongst one another while they continue to sap the economy with money wasted on useless and fruitless projects. Your loss usa.
Chev4206 9 months ago
whats up with the picture of kurt?
xeadm 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Moon landing was a hoax.Wherever you are in this planet you entitled and you have every right to protest about the so called "moon landing" as the criminals of NASA used (and capitalized) on the very concept of mankind within their moon fraud, and don't forget the murders they did.
Send your emails to UN and USA foreign office asking for an official investigation of the Moon landing fraud.
potrodsas 9 months ago
You raise some good points albeit they've all been brought up before like 20 years ago. I still like the discussion though.
sportsportsport 9 months ago
The LROC has taken pictures of the equipment you want to see, so you can remove this video now.
Blahblobify 9 months ago
"Did the United States FAKE Landing on the Moon???"
Yes. Yes, they did.
It is very obvious that ALL Apollo "landings" were faked, studio filmed, airbrushed, and their endless anomalies and auto-docked cameras, video-graphic anomalies, odd and fake rock distribution to some countries verified, color formatting fails have been verified, 32,000 photos and not even 1/10th released.
Strange enough?
I believe there weren't even any more photos than the ones that SEEMED real enough to publicize.
AndyHarglesisBACKUP 9 months ago
Who the hell is this guy? Why should I listen to him?
tubedweeb 9 months ago
@tubedweeb
Who told you you have to?
Thank$ for watching thi$ video though.
TheArchfiend 9 months ago 9
@TheArchfiend well the moons always rotating/turning/spining so it might be a little hard
DoubleshotBDP 8 months ago
@DoubleshotBDP why do we see only one side?oh yeah, it spins while we sleep,...huh!!,...seriously?
firefirefuneralpyre 7 months ago
@firefirefuneralpyre but then wouldnt hat mean the other side of the world would see the other side because you said when were sleeping, umm theres always some part of the world sleeping. i was just trying to say they dont know exact spot so it might be a little hard on top of we dont even know if are side we see is the right side
DoubleshotBDP 7 months ago
@TheArchfiend LOL I see what you did there...good one.
TheBelowAverageG4mer 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tubedweeb why should you comment on his video?
Gezim911 8 months ago
@tubedweeb he has a footlong penis
MrKwameR 7 months ago
The Moon Landing -- that was real. The Internet -- Now THAT'S fake!
NovitasMaximus 9 months ago
The Moon Landing -- That was real; The Internet -- now THAT was fake!
NovitasMaximus 9 months ago
But with this the USA bought the Russians telescope of over 1 billion dollars to by the telescope and they even went to that extent of bringing the guy the built it to America and most of the materials.
Holden22ford 9 months ago
I hope they didn't fake the moon landing. If it was real they left a lot of historic junk parked on my acre of lunar land... (ha ha ha.)
jbodden6977 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go on youtube and search "Lunar Legacy" it debunks every moon hoax claim. It will reveal to you that all that "proof" you have been told, is all bullshit. We went to the moon. Simple fact.
audioblood87 10 months ago
I know this is an old video, but this guy really does make sense. Its a really pleasant change to listen to someone who does believe the moon landing happened, yet STILL questions the "official storyline". You really did get your point across.
Kudos to you dude!
TheTeflonTypist 10 months ago
i like it he raises a good point
Holden22ford 10 months ago
You didnt research that hard. Heres the link:
nasa[dot]gov /mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites[dot]html
shagster1970 10 months ago
@shagster1970 Not very convincing. You could say they doctored the images. The pictures are too high to really prove anything to be honest. I think most people don't doubt we went to the moon it's just you get called an idiot or dumb for simply asking questions. What if part of the Apollo mission were staged! So no one thinks the images are too perfect and landing on the moon that many times with no deaths or incidents is not questionable. It's history so why disbelieve it.
CProton69 9 months ago