The Bible is a Reliable Source: ALL New Testament Books Written Prior to A.D. 100 - Pt 3

[inyaazz]

This girl and Maximus Aruealius are full of shit. Take some college courses in humanity, biology, and anthropolgy to answers the question. You guys are so wrong it is mind blowing.

[xPrincessGarnetXVI]

@KristinaLovesJesus-Gluttony is a sin you hypocrite,look at yourself all dolled up like one of the Kardashians, you spoiled little bitch. you love jesus so much then give up your material things,and help the homeless and hungry. Also brush the cheese off your teeth,and get some braces

[MaximusArurealius]

The Bible, like many books, was written by eyewitnesses (Matthew, Mark, and John) to the events and circumstances that they recorded. That they were trustworthy witnesses is only to be expected, since God inspired them to co-author their respective portions of the Bible. But some ask: how can we know if the Bible's human co-authors were really reliable eyewitnesses? cont.

[MaximusArurealius]

The following eyewitness traits are emphasized in common law, law school, and Rules of Evidence.

A reliable witness will evidence honesty by his sincerity of speech, and be clearly motivated by a drive to speak the truth. The quality of a witness's observations can be observed by accurate memory, evidenced often by access to accurate records. The competency of his communication will be demonstrated by an ability to recall and describe observations, with accurate information and relevant details.

[MaximusArurealius]

Testimonial consistency is also a key factor in reliability. All Scripture has perfect evidentiary consistency. Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Moses, Daniel, Jude, and all of the other Bible's co-authors qualify as impeccably reliable eyewitnesses. Many of the Bible's writers suffered cruel treatment, even death, for their witness. To the obvious credibility of their writings is added the unshakeable belief that their testimony was so true that it was worth suffering and dying for.

[MaximusArurealius]

1. Although the Bible was written over 1,600 years by 40 different authors from widely different occupations and cultures, on varied, controversial subjects, yet they essentially agreed with each other -- a phenomenon unparalleled in literature. In addition, biblical creationists can point out examples where the scientific community was in error and the Bible was clearly correct.

[MaximusArurealius]

2. For example, until the 1970s the scientific consensus on how lions killed their prey was in error and the Bible turned out to be right in this matter. Also, for centuries the scientific community believed that snakes could not hear and the 1988 edition of The New Encyclopedia Britannica stated the snakes could not hear but that was mistaken and the Bible was correct in this matter.

[MaximusArurealius]

3. In addition, 19th century European naturalists were wrong concerning a matter regarding ant behavior and the Bible was correct. Many creationists such as the creationist at Creation Ministries International and CreationWiki assert that the Bible contains knowledge that shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed. In addition, Christianity had a profound influence in regards to the development of modern science.

[Yrhp8268]

@MaximusArurealius I agree. Also, to add to your points, watch a video on YouTube called:

"Can You Trust the Bible Historically? - Is it a Game of Telephone? - What about the Gnostic Gospels? "

It provides further convincing evidence of the Bible's historical legitimacy.

[Yrhp8268]

. @MaximusArurealius Plus, 2000 years before modern science, the Bible referred to our earth being a circular shape suspended in space. (Read JOB 26:7 & ISAIAH 40:22).

And the Bible referred to atoms. (Read HEBREWS 11:3)

Lastly, up until the 19th century, scientists believed that the universe was static and unchanging. However, they have since realized that the Bible is correct in that the universe was created and that, even now, it is still expanding. (Read JOB 9:8 & JOB 37:18)

[MaximusArurealius]

@Yrhp8268 THANKS

[drquad1]

Hottttt as

[mandrillx]

your using the old , if you repeat something over and over , people will eventually beleive as true. but, just because soething is rewriten many times does not change the fact that is is still false. The bible has many glareing erors both historical and science based. And the bible has many contridictions. the bible is extremely unrealible for anything other than a class b fictional book.

[1MoreMuslim]

What you have done in the 26 of March 1999? and what you  have said? Was it a sunny day?

Come on ! don't fool us, you have no idea!

[1MoreMuslim]

70 years wow that a lifetime, Do you remember what you have done 20 years ago?

[C00lblkatheist]

The bible isn't a reliable source for ANYTHING.. For it to be considered a reliable source, you must first prove God exists, and using the bible to prove God is something we like to call, circular reasoning.. Well the bible is reliable if you think pi=3, snakes can talk, the moon emits its own light, bats are birds, a 600 year old man put two of every animal in a boat (which is impossible) and plants didn't die during the storm, and believers should kill non-believers

[quasarsphere]

Well...the Bible is a reliable source of comedy.

[MaximusArurealius]

@C00lblkatheist You're a liar.

[daranac2]

amazing video! may the LORD give you strength to spred the truth!

God bless you

[Candy9355]

Great JOB!

[SAUNDERSacts2618]

I love this vid!

[seanpaynedotnet]

The only woman in the Bible who wore makeup was Jezebel.

2 Kings 9:30

Just remember that....

(Prove all things, because whatsoever is not done in faith is sin)

[Candy9355]

haha.. funny... old testament

[Epydemic2020]

wow.

[theheat151]

Were these early Christian fathers "Catholics"?

[DerekHowardM]

Catholic means "all" or "universal" so they were Catholic in the sense that they are part of the one holy catholic and apostolic Church.

If you are asking whether they were Roman Catholic, the answer would be no since the Great Schism did not happen until A.D. 1054.

[AgApE010]

Hey truthseeker,

I think there was a church historian who said that John wrote Revelation at the close of Domitian's reign, which was around 95AD (Sorry i don't remember his name, i'm sure you can look it up on the internet). Maybe that explains why Clement didn't quote any of John's epistles when writing from Rome in 95AD (it would've taken time for John's epistles to be distributed all the way to Rome. No FedEx in those days! :P ).

And i agree, preterism is an false view.

God bless you!

[What160]

YOU need to show how you did take it into context.

READ the Bible

I am TheBibleIsImmoral i think KristinaLovesJesus blocked my other channel.

[Tonloc1986]

Once again, another awesome fact filled video! How long will unbelievers continue to ignore the facts? I know it's true that the Bible is exactly right about those who love darkness rather than light. Great the awesome vids coming Kristina! God bless you! :-)

[TheBibleIsImmoral]

1 Samuel 15:2-3

2 Thus says the LORD of hosts: I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt. 3 Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.

[Tonloc1986]

Red herring anyone? Do you have something along the lines of refuting the information in the video? Or will you continue to post Bible verses that you've taken out of context? Focus on the information presented in the video, not your biased distortion of the Bible.

[TheBibleIsImmoral]

Or will you continue to post Bible verses that you've taken out of context?

haha This must be the way you ratinalizing the Unholy Bible?

Prove i took 1 Samuel 15:2-3

out of context.

[Tonloc1986]

I can prove it, but that is NOT the topic up for discussion in this video. I won't fall into your red herring logical fallacy nonsense. If you want to discuss that verse, send me a friends request and we can discuss it in PM's, but I WILL NOT discuss it on this video. The topic is about how the Bible is a reliable source, and there's LOTS of information being presented to prove it. Refute the information, don't post up Bible verses that say nothing about what's being discussed.

[CPatriot333]

You're videos are excellent. I really enjoy them.  Have you read any of Lee Strobel's books?

[CPatriot333]

oops... make that "Your" (just in case there are any grammar nazis around) :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

LOL you're so funny! "grammar nazis" hehehe. That's a funny question.. when the Lord was bringing closer to Him (before I was saved) I read a bit of Lee Strobel's "The Case for Faith." I found it at a tiny book for store 25 cents. I admit I need to reread it!! I've read a bit of "The Case for Christ," but I havn't done an indepth study on it. I think maybe I'll take a look into His books again. :D God bless you!!

[CPatriot333]

Awesome. :) When I went through a period of doubt during high school, I read "The Case for Christ" and it really opened my eyes to a lot of evidence that I was unaware of before. Anyway, keep up the great work. God Bless!

[KristinaLovesJesus]

oops I forgot to add "me" hehehe.. Gotta watch out for those grammar nazis lol :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

WOW I didn't realize how many mistakes I made in that paragraph I just wrote... LOL ;)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Okay thanks so much!! Aww and thank you for all your support!! God bless!! :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Oh, you're very welcome for responding lol. Ah, okay!! Thank you so much for the heads up! I'll do research on Preterism as well as Revelation. :)

[CPatriot333]

Preterism is just another orthodox interpretation of Revelation that is just as respectable as Futurism. It's hyper-preterism you have to worry about. Hyper-preterists believe that the second coming has already happened and that belief is NOT orthodox. For a good understanding of what traditional Preterists believe check out this video series:

youtube(dot)com/view_play_list­?p=C31A25E0CE0A1DC5

There are Bible-believing born-again Christians who are Preterists and others who are Futurists.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Oh wow, well thank you so much!!! I'll take a look! :D

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Hmm.. I do admit I'm fuzzy on this one. I'll try to do a bit more research on Revelation. Sorry I couldn't give you a quick answer! I'm just comparing the books by their details and who wrote them.. I'll get back to you on this one! :)

[struggle4all]

Great work sis! Continue to let the spirit work through you! God bless you!

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Aww God bless you!! :)

[siftedby666]

God Bless you for educating yourself and others on this

[KristinaLovesJesus]

God bless you too!!! :)

[axisapex]

good video -here is another good video - /watch?v=E8l0PlQ93B4&feature=c­hannel_page

[theTRUTHgroup]

You certainly have been doing a lot of reading and studying.

Good job.

Keep it up.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Thanks Daniel...

It's not for me... it's for the Lord. It's for all those individuals who I know, who NEED to hear the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ! It's for them... it's for those individuals I witness to on the street.. the ones I hand out Gospel tracts to.. God bless you Daniel. :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

..It's for my sister.. it's for my family.. I had a revelation yesterday about hell, and it sparked a change of thought about my life.. and how I can't afford to let time go wasted doing selfish things.. thanks for the support Daniel. :)

[theTRUTHgroup]

You're right, time IS short.

I'm SO glad that you're choosing to invest in important things.

God's really doing a work in you.

It's encouraging to see.

Don't stop!

[yrulooknatme]

Solid evidence!  Eye opening! Thanks!

[KristinaLovesJesus]

lol You're welcome.. it's my pleasure! God bless you!! :)

[boomya555]

Great vid.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

God bless you!! :)