When she said that statement she was talking about civil rights cases and actually said that a white judge can make a case on a civil rights case but it takes time and effort to be empathetic.
Specifically she was talking about the allowing of separate but equal by white judges.
Would a Black man, with the richness of his experiences (including underprivileged education) have come to the same conclusion? He would have not allowed it. Same goes for a latina women from that background.
That's not true. Clarence Thomas would have came to the same conclusion as the white judge. Judges are suppose to draw conclusions from an objective point of view, without any personal biases.
I know of no conservative, of any consequence, that would still hold a public office after making comments similar to those this woman has made. These attitudes and statements undeniably reflect the ideals and philosophy of the nominator.
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to be one of THee First to say wHat a Phrophet of God Has SaiD: Mitt Romney will be PresiDent in 2013...........
FireYourJOB 1 year ago
When she said that statement she was talking about civil rights cases and actually said that a white judge can make a case on a civil rights case but it takes time and effort to be empathetic.
Specifically she was talking about the allowing of separate but equal by white judges.
Would a Black man, with the richness of his experiences (including underprivileged education) have come to the same conclusion? He would have not allowed it. Same goes for a latina women from that background.
etbitmydogucf 2 years ago
That's not true. Clarence Thomas would have came to the same conclusion as the white judge. Judges are suppose to draw conclusions from an objective point of view, without any personal biases.
nasera24 2 years ago
Krauthammer is 100% right.
HeWhoPawns 2 years ago 2
Yeah, let's get support this guy! :D
zakard114 2 years ago
I know of no conservative, of any consequence, that would still hold a public office after making comments similar to those this woman has made. These attitudes and statements undeniably reflect the ideals and philosophy of the nominator.
poconopete50 2 years ago 3
Here is how Sotomayor decides: Whoever is from the most "historically discriminated" catagory wins the case, regardless of merit.
The question: Will we be able to dig out of the damage Obama is doing to the country, and if so, how long will it take?
Nokomisclub 2 years ago
Identity politics is not a democratic idea; it's a marxist idea. The democrats might as well change their name to the socialist party.
AlanCom1 2 years ago 2
Vote out all incumbents out of office 2010.
I pray the Republicans stop bending over to the rotten Democrats they all look stupid and stupid is as stupid does.
whitmts 2 years ago
If only the stupid republicans would listen to him!
connecticutmommmy 2 years ago
thank god for krauthhammer.
he makes sense of everything.
fubar28 2 years ago
Yeah, He really is! lol
zakard114 2 years ago
Krauthammer is the Stephen Hawking of politics.
tnekkc 2 years ago