needs to learn from sneijder, messi (argentina role),platini, iniesta, david silva and rooney at how to be a good playmaker #10 behind the main strikers (target man)
Quality tactical analysis again. The biggest myth going ATM is that he can play the Cesc role, HE CANNOT. He's proven again and again to be below average there. Really scared if Wenger is willing to sell Cesc to put Nasri in that role ...
@cwdcomps Fortunately it seems from pre-season games that Wenger's "A team" included Ramsey and Wilshere in midfield. I'd prefer Rosicky ahead of Nasri too.
@TacticalRenoog Yeah, that's a good point. Ramsey really could've been ready by now to replace Cesc without the injury, I think we've been a little unlucky in a couple situations like that. Gibbs should really have been ready to replace Clichy by now but 2 seasons of constant injuries have made it a big ask. I don't like blaming luck but injuries have played a part in a lot of factors over the past seasons.
Brilliant again mr renoog, his problem as you pointed out is he is too direct and elaborate for the main central role in Arsenal's team. Arsenal don't need an attacking midfielder in their system but rather someone who can sit in the centre and control the flow of the team (fabregas). Nasri is best for Arsenal on the wing where he is free to do his tricks and skills, but not in the centre where they need someone who can keep possesion well.
@deklinjj Totally agree, his best form so far has been in a direct role on the right around September-December last year. In some games his goalscoring instinct would be useful in the no.10 position, but the majority of the time I'd prefer a sharp, incisive passer like Fabregas over a goalscorer, the team takes priority IMO and the other 3 attacking players need servicing.
Nice one renoog, i could not agree with you more. Van Persie plays number 10 well. Nasri doesn't move the ball quick enough, and the trait of number 10s really has been a masterful first touch, (zidane, bergkamp) which he doesn't have. My main prob with nasri is his over-elaboration, taking too many touches. It's so difficult to find a good position for him. I think the only place for him would be as a deep lying playmaker like Xavi but he doesn't have the vision nor defensive responsibility.
@julianken2008 I think he's done well when played on the right in the Walcott role i.e. making diagonal runs from out wide to get into goalscoring positions. His finishing and tight control make him a good goalthreat, he doesn't really have the vision/speed of mind to be a playmaker IMO.
@bloodybutsa guess his cities problem now, and mancini must recognise that he cannot pull the strings for a team as successfully as fabregas or david silva, made no impact whatsover today, and only when silva came on city the team got chances,
make no mistake nasri has classs but he cant be the central figure and play in the playmaking role. he needs to accompany a number 10
u r very right in this analysis, with this theory being more evident in manchester city
needs to learn from sneijder, messi (argentina role),platini, iniesta, david silva and rooney at how to be a good playmaker #10 behind the main strikers (target man)
bloodybutsa 6 months ago
Quality tactical analysis again. The biggest myth going ATM is that he can play the Cesc role, HE CANNOT. He's proven again and again to be below average there. Really scared if Wenger is willing to sell Cesc to put Nasri in that role ...
cwdcomps 7 months ago
@cwdcomps Fortunately it seems from pre-season games that Wenger's "A team" included Ramsey and Wilshere in midfield. I'd prefer Rosicky ahead of Nasri too.
TacticalRenoog 7 months ago
@TacticalRenoog Yeah, that's a good point. Ramsey really could've been ready by now to replace Cesc without the injury, I think we've been a little unlucky in a couple situations like that. Gibbs should really have been ready to replace Clichy by now but 2 seasons of constant injuries have made it a big ask. I don't like blaming luck but injuries have played a part in a lot of factors over the past seasons.
cwdcomps 7 months ago
This video doesn't seem to play.
MrSimonpoole 7 months ago
@MrSimonpoole The video's not on youtube (for copyright reasons), if you check the description there's a link to view it on vimeo.
TacticalRenoog 7 months ago
Love the tactic vids!
RonneniPhone 7 months ago
@RazorsEdgeNZ agreed!
RoyalDevil3 7 months ago
Brilliant again mr renoog, his problem as you pointed out is he is too direct and elaborate for the main central role in Arsenal's team. Arsenal don't need an attacking midfielder in their system but rather someone who can sit in the centre and control the flow of the team (fabregas). Nasri is best for Arsenal on the wing where he is free to do his tricks and skills, but not in the centre where they need someone who can keep possesion well.
deklinjj 7 months ago
@deklinjj Totally agree, his best form so far has been in a direct role on the right around September-December last year. In some games his goalscoring instinct would be useful in the no.10 position, but the majority of the time I'd prefer a sharp, incisive passer like Fabregas over a goalscorer, the team takes priority IMO and the other 3 attacking players need servicing.
TacticalRenoog 7 months ago
Nice one renoog, i could not agree with you more. Van Persie plays number 10 well. Nasri doesn't move the ball quick enough, and the trait of number 10s really has been a masterful first touch, (zidane, bergkamp) which he doesn't have. My main prob with nasri is his over-elaboration, taking too many touches. It's so difficult to find a good position for him. I think the only place for him would be as a deep lying playmaker like Xavi but he doesn't have the vision nor defensive responsibility.
julianken2008 7 months ago
@julianken2008 I think he's done well when played on the right in the Walcott role i.e. making diagonal runs from out wide to get into goalscoring positions. His finishing and tight control make him a good goalthreat, he doesn't really have the vision/speed of mind to be a playmaker IMO.
TacticalRenoog 7 months ago
@TacticalRenoog well said
bloodybutsa 6 months ago
@bloodybutsa guess his cities problem now, and mancini must recognise that he cannot pull the strings for a team as successfully as fabregas or david silva, made no impact whatsover today, and only when silva came on city the team got chances,
make no mistake nasri has classs but he cant be the central figure and play in the playmaking role. he needs to accompany a number 10
u r very right in this analysis, with this theory being more evident in manchester city
spot on video man
bloodybutsa 1 month ago