I did watch this and the Liberals have edited it and taken so much from it that it only suports the fact that it was a terrorist attack. Brainwashed Liberals don't know that.
The people of my country U.S.A do we even matter to those behind gated communities who would trade the lives of working americans for a 7 billion dollar pay day? Its fucked up
Inside job... Northwood files... does it really even matter? Either way, the average American still has to go to a job every day to try and make ends meet. It's not complacency. It's existence. I'm poor, and I cut and burn metal for a living. I'm not the smartest guy on the planet, but I'm here to tell you that diesel fuel doesn't cut down a skyscraper in 15 minutes.
This really isn't a strong argument. Of course, you have insurance against terrorism for a WTC building! That happened before. Explosives are used when you demolish a building. After planes hit, the buildings were weak and needed to come down. I've looked at all the 9/11Truth stuff and there are so many holes in the theories. I want to believe the 9/11Truth but I just see it as unintelligent. We are all slaves and we get what they give us. Trying to build out of mass media a truth they gave us?
@screenname12341 I agree that this particular video is a weak argument. Its easy to spin facts and twist words to make any situation appear significantly different than it actually was. That being said, there are a few small things, like no plane bits at the pentagon, which point to us not getting the entire story.
This video states, "Blast, shoot, blow and pull are terms used in the demolition industry to refer to bringing down buildings, bridges and other structures." Then the evidence they provide to show that these are terms that are used in demolition, they have them saying blast, shoot and blow, but not pull. /facepalm I hope not many people fell for this video, because this is just one glaring example of what's wrong with this video.
@IturaldeRodel Were you even there and watching television and keeping up on this stuff? They were tying cables around the bits that were left standing and literally pulling them down.
@nexus1g As a matter of fact, being a member ADF, I was very interested in what was going on. I was keenly keeping up with what was going on. And having a family involved in construction, I know a few things about buildings, despite the fact we don't do demolitions. I would love for you to give me an example of where a multi story building is brought down by tying cables around it, and "pulling" that cable.
@IturaldeRodel They weren't pulling the whole building down, they were pulling down what was left standing. You can find images if you do a simply Google search of the cables around what's left standing of the buildings tied to a digger about to pull it over.
@nexus1g Mate, my initial comment to you was because I thought you were mistaken, and I just wanted to bring the "pull" part of the video to your attention. But I can see now that you are being purposely ignorant. That's fine, it's your choice, but please don't dig your self in deeper with comments like that... it's just silly.
@nexus1g Great vid. As for sides, pretty hard from 7 min to really take sides. Let me set you straight, I'm not a hard line conspiracy theorist. I don't know what happened that day. However, I am on the side of those who ask questions. Not with those who simply accept the "offical" story and leave it at that. Why ask questions? Because there ARE alot of things that don't add up that day. Actually, watch the entire Loose Change doco, it has many, many good questions...
@nexus1g However, what I find REALLY amazing, is that SO many people are OPPOSED to asking questions... WHY?! There are thousands of Americans being killed. Sons, daughters, siblings... thousands of people from other nations. If even the tiniest little thing didn't add up, wouldn't you want to know? Wouldn't you want to be sure? It's crazy enough imo that ppl aren't asking questions themselves, but to be calling down those that are? Amazing... can't think of another word.
@IturaldeRodel I have watched the whole video. It was painful to watch because of the blatant intellectual dishonesty and logical fallacies. People aren't opposed to asking questions, but they are opposed to people who haven't done proper research making sensational claims.
@nexus1g Yes, there are some really silly vids out there. To anyone purporting an idea, I ask, prove it. But I think the same onus should go on the officials also, especially if things don't add up. Disregard NORAD, disregard missing pentagon tapes, disregard the Shanksville crash (all BIG items which don't add up); tell me about WTC-7. A building with fire on SOME floors, burns a few hours, then collapses in less then 7 sec symetrically into its footprint? Come on man? That add up?
@nexus1g I did watch the video. The explanation that a fire caused all of the collumns to simultaniously collapse imo doesn't add up. Also, if you look at videos of WTC-7 collapsing you will see that it actually fell from the bottom. The bottom floors gave first, followed by the rest of the building, all collapsing neatly and symetrically into it's foot print. The explanation given by NIST doesn't explain that, and it was never mentioned in the 9/11 commission report at all.
@IturaldeRodel "he explanation that a fire caused all of the collumns to simultaniously collapse imo doesn't add up." Well your opinion doesn't really matter here. Facts matter. And no one said the columns simultaneously collapsed at once. And WTC7's internal structure collapsed, first one side then the other then the rest of the building came down. There's videos that show the roof objects falling in as the structure starts to collapse.
@nexus1g "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission), an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks"... from the front page. Note the work "full and complete account". WTC-7 wasn't a part of 9/11?
@IturaldeRodel And what do you mean NORAD and the Shanksville crash don't add up? Of course they do. And why do you expect to see tapes from the PENTAGON of all places?
@nexus1g As for NORAD, please look up plane interceptions over US airspace in 2000. Please look up average interception time, and miss rate. Then tell explain to me what happened on 9/11...
Shanksville crash. Look up any photos of airplane crashes, then compare them to the Shanskville one. Does it add up?
Over 80 possible videos that could show what hit Pentagon. Of 5 released, none show clearly what. Why? Especially if it debunks cons? And why does the damage not fit the explanation?
@IturaldeRodel First of all, there is no way that a U.S. fighter jet will shoot down an airliner full of civilians whether attacks are happening or not. There are no acceptable sacrifices like that. What if they ended up shooting down the wrong aircraft? Or an aircraft that had its hijackers subdued by the passengers? Let alone that the plane may then crash into other people on the ground. No, that just would never happen.
@nexus1g Actually, you're quite wrong. On ALL points. I urge you to do some research before stating things, but let me enlighten you on a couple of things. NORAD is contacted as soon as a plane, any plane, deviates significantly from it's flight path and/or cannot be contacted, and/or is lost from radar contact. All four planes were constantly tracked by radar so there is no chance of "mistaken identity". If a plane is to hit a target with high civilan casualties, it shouldnt be downed?
@IturaldeRodel The hijackers turned off the planes' transponders so, no, they were not identifiable. Any plane in the sky at the time with a malfunctioning transponder could have been the target of being shot down at that point. Do you start to see the problem? And, no, under no circumstances should we fire on a plane full of civilians. EVER. We try to get those in danger out of danger as quickly as possible, but we don't kill civilians.
@nexus1g In any case, should or shouldn't don't play a part. Prior to 9/11, fighter jets had to get approval from the president, or vp, before shooting down a commercial jet. Considering the time frame between the first plane impact, to the second, let alone third and fourth, they had plenty of time to do so.
Post 9/11, the law was specifically changed so that Air Force generals are authorised to down high jacked commercial jets without consulting the president.
@IturaldeRodel Again, we get people who are in danger our of danger as quickly as possible. We don't kill civilians under any circumstances -- even if it may seem like the lesser of two evils at the time. The right thing to do is what they did.
@IturaldeRodel A plane dived straight into the ground, and I'm to compare this to photos of planes in controlled crashes? watch?v=UJb08ZzejAA This is what happens even at a slow speed when an airplane goes into an uncontrolled crash in the ground. Now imagine that, nose first at the speed of sound. You'll be lucky to have any identifiable parts.
@nexus1g Controlled crash? I'm not sure what you mean by that, but here is an interesting fact. There has NEVER been an air crash with ANY similarity to that of the fourth plane. In all manner of accidents, be they mid air explosions, mid air collisions, ground crashes from high or low altitude (and if it's high altitude, it is high speed) there has ALWAYS been left over, indentifiable wreckage, and bodies. Nither was present at Shanskville.
@IturaldeRodel A controlled crash is a crash in which the plane had to "land" in an unfavorable location like water, forest, field, etc. Planes typically don't just drop like rocks when something goes wrong.
High altitude doesn't mean high speed. And your evidence is highly anecdotal. Please reform your argument.
@IturaldeRodel The last thing the government needs to concern itself with is debunking ignorant people who haven't done their research properly. And it doesn't matter if you have a video of a plane hitting it or not. A plane did, people on the plane died, people saw it, just because you don't have a video doesn't mean anything. There was a swath of damage through the Pentagon. That's a large, heavy object that hit it to carry that much energy through the building.
@nexus1g Asking for evidence, especially under the Freedom of Information Act, is not ignorant, and the government most definitely needs to concern itself with it's people. It most certanly DOES matter if there is a video of the plane, since that would show exactly what and how hit the Pentagon, rather than saying, "trust me, it was this plane". Even a court of law doesn't work that way. You need evidence, and the evidence of the plane is missing. No wreckage.
@IturaldeRodel A plane hit the Pentagon. Why do you doubt that? Even in Loose Change they show a turbine fan from the engine of the plane on the lawn of the Pentagon.
@nexus1g As for the swath of damage... well, let's look at that. What about the LACK of damage on the lawn? Lack of fusalage? Lack of Engines? Lack of damage consistant with a large plane hitting in the way it was explained? What about the exit hole at the back which was also never explained, and cannot be explained if was a plane?
@IturaldeRodel Why would there be damage to the lawn? The lawn right in front of the building wasn't mint, so there was some damage close to the impact as would be expected. Why would there even be a fuselage left? Did you watch the second video I linked you? As I said, even in Loose Change there's a picture of a turbine fan at the Pentagon. The damage was consistent. The exit hole is explainable. You didn't watch the first video I sent you.
@IturaldeRodel I don't know why I'm even bothering arguing with you when you're bringing things up that was already disproved in the videos I sent you (which you clearly didn't watch). You're ignorant and stubborn, and you like being that way.
UK CITIZENS VERY URGENT - Babar Ahmad is the longest detained without trial British citizen, now in his eighth year behind bars fighting against extradition to the US. He was beaten up by the British police when he was arrested. We need 100,000 signatures by 10/11/11 and Parliament will debate putting Babar on trial in the UK where he is more likely to get a fair trial. Visit freebabarahmad website for the link. Please spread.
@vipnon1965 You just listen to half-truths and outright fabrications. That's why you think it's an inside job. If you took time to verify the facts, you'd find that the conspiracy theorists are full of it to the brim.
Watch this video - Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens " & listen to the guy really well a few times & then listen to
Alex Jones again in the video above. They have the same tone, like its a complete staged act. IMO Alex Jones is a NWO Plant, a Pied Piper of sorts, leading the people to become angry at the Govt & to demonstrate. Of coarse He will say it must be
peaceful, but how many people are going to be able to hold back once they know
those 7,000,000,000 should be spread equally to the families that lost loved ones. Sounds to me like Population Control and World Order which is the control of the Middle East
The ignorance that prevails in the US is very very scary! when 9/11 happened I was only 16 and with zero notion of engineering or architectural knowledge I thought myself: how is possible that 2 steel towers collapse by just being hit by a plane of that dimension in the top of the tower? Then why is the US attacking Afghanistan? And then Why is it attacking Iraq? and all these Americans would solve those questions by watching TV! American leaders are a very evil cancer for the planet! Not off
@abstractadonis while i believe it was an inside job it really looks like the building fell from the plane impacts and fuel fires and not bombs. if u watch from all angles u can see the building break right where the plane hit and the top falls on the bottom half and demolishes it... people claim there was bombs in the lobby but if u watch closely the lobby is the last bit of the building to go.... world trade centre 7 on the other hand goes down very suspiciously from all angles
@figgywurmack if you examine wtc2 going down frame by frame you will see that it was demolition. on t.v. and even on most youtube videos it falls way to fast to actually see the demolition in action, but for the record you can see the building being blown out before the top fell on it.
@abstractadonis You have these questions because you were ignorant. You have zero knowledge of engineering and architecture -- stick with that and don't jump to conclusions. The war in Iraq was completely unrelated to 9/11 and had been a situation that had been boiling for 10 years prior to 9/11. The United States attacked Afghanistan because that is where Osama bin Laden made his home. We told the Taliban to give up Osama. They refused. We attacked.
@TheJmac777 This is what I call intellectual blackmail. Make a statement, provide no support for said statement and then state that only idiots would disagree with the statement. Definitely a logical fallacy.
@berletka There you go again making little sense and making extremely poor use of the language. Until you can get your ideas out there clearly, quit wasting my time.
@MyCrownOfWorms if you do not understand what i am saying it is clear that you would not understand 9/11 consequences, go watch some advertisements and serials and do not forget about crisps
@MyCrownOfWorms English is clearly not his first language, and somehow you think that speaking multiple languages is grounds for questioning someone's intellect? And he made an excellent point. His use of the English language has as much to do with whether one cares about 9/11 or not as what kind of toothpaste you use.
I was able to understand. I guess since you weren't capable of comprehending what he was saying, then it's your intelligence that is really in question.
@MyCrownOfWorms Of all the things that have happened on this planet in recent history, it's one of the things that truly do matter. The fall of the Soviet Union, Berlin Wall coming down, the splitting of Sudan, the attacks on 9/11... These are defining moments of history to the world. If anything is important, then it is events like these.
PEOPLE WERE IN THAT BUILDING THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO DESTROY AND THEY KNEW WHEN THOSE TOWERS FELL THAT IT WOULD RELEASE ALL TYPES OF POISONS TOXINS AND PRODUCTS!!!! WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE THEY WANT US DEAD!!! ITS NOT SPECULATION OR PARANOIA ITS REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
orson wells did it just to see if he could...technology being what it was then could be used as mass mind control. Hitler did it minus the technology. but your point is well taken Veronica
OH Get real your gene pool is made up of the exact same people inbreed mutant yukky ... Your country is built up with blood money so blow a pipe out ya ass mofo ! My country don't need you's as an ally because far as i'm concerned all your country wants is WAR and no thanks pathetic how innocent people died and all you can do is defend the monsters who did it ! As for history America hasn't spared a few yrs between wars ???
@TheJodee21 man, stfu. You are from a gene pool made up by rapist, homosexuals, criminals and such...the fucking scum the empire no longer wanted and shipped off to an island far far away - so if I were you, I wouldnt run my lips so tough on the internet. You are worthless, w/o the US as an Ally, your pos island would no longer be "yours" and your state language would be russian or Chinese...think about history for a bit before letting the shit in your brain spill out.
@USMCSRIG to be honest...being shipped off by the Empire of Britain is a mark of honor if nothing else. at least by the logic of your reasoning, so just stfu already. Youre a Roman apologist. this is my country as well, but im not asleep assshole. keep believing in the dream when its already been hijacked and traumatically transformed into some egregious and unrecognizable.
blood money for who?the govt said? talk to the hand........my other hand is holding all that insurance money and the comonation to the gold that was in the trade center.gold vault somewhere ?
jews mossad from zionist israel did it. jews in charge of clearing all wreckage debries, jews plotted every modern war, financial crisis, and in the end, the extermination of most of gentiles who they consider animals. talmud a satanic book judaism a satanic cult, jews , freemasons, CIA , fema , AIPAc, responsible for most of world crimes
@blaztmarket skinhead, you sound like a fucking nazi. Quit blaming the jews for everything. If a waiter drops your freaking food, i bet you'd blame the jews then too! Ass hole, Jewish people are good people they aren't out to seek destruction.
Just 1 thing when the first plane hit the tower why were there no fighter jets or helicopters to the crash site? why they did not shoot down the second plane? Why they attack then a country and occupy it for "peace keeping"? it should be Oil taking not keeping.... USA is a fucking greedy country and needs to stop and think about it that there are other countries and ppl out there not just them. AND i dont wanna offend the ppl living there its not your fault you are just a tool of many.
I am sure 911 was an inside job. I liked it, especially the pentagon getting missiled. Talk about shooting themselves in the foot. I wish more insurance salesmen died though, most of the people in the towers were on my deserves to die list. I had just gotten out of prison for a drug crime. I saw it as a well deserved reward by Karma herself. I laughed and cheered. I swear to god (me). LOL. Not the devil of the bible whose way to right a wrong is to kill something innocent. (jew god)
I'm always wondering, why they haven't blow building 7 while the north tower collapsed, this would be the easiest way to hide what exact causes the collapse! This makes no sense, even if i convinced that he really mean pull in order to bring it down, you can see it in his eyes as he spoke out!
for me it was the counter-intuitive agruments involving building 7 vs the towers. in the case of the towers, they claimed it would take WEEKS to rig a building to drop in its footprint yet when building 7 is mentioned, well hell, they rigged and dropped THAT edifice in a matter of hours. You can't have the lie point both ways in the same breath. At best, it was a colossal case of incompetence on the part of our "intelligence" community at worst, the fucks are complicit!
Why would Giuliani want to find shelter in a building that was 1) damaged and 2) right next to two buildings that were just hit by planes? That argument makes no sense to me.
it was not an inside job, they just knew they were going to do it and let it happen. do you think pearl harbor was any different? its easier to get involved in a war when you are attacked first.
@Marsdevilsvolta You should check out the movie loose change. It's really eye opening and points out a lot of weird coincidences that took place on that day.
if you guys believe or are interested in this and believe there is way more behind the government (not only having to do with the 9/11) and all that good stuff you should watch the "Zeitgeist" films. they're filled with information
@Superhero6734ify they killed osama bin laden on may 1st, The patriot act, which Obama absolutely hated during his campain was set to expire on may 31. Obama killed Osama, raised the terror alert status and signed the Patriot Act for another four years. You may want to add Barak Obama to your terrorist list.
@nightwolf9100 yea i know all about that, and on the 27th floor i believe it was, there was a SECRET BUNKER FOR BASICALLY ALL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO GO IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY; and they blew it up!
This could've been where it was pulled off, because otherwise why destroy that building??
And one more thing: Bush said that he said he saw the video of the first plane hitting the WTC before he went to read to the kids at the school... (video of this is on youtube)
Problem is, not ONE video that captured the first plane hitting the WTC was aired on 9/11, the videos were shown on 9/12....
And why won't they release a video that SHOWS what hit the pentagon? Only explosions.
Bin Laden is just another Lee Harvey Oswald, a patsy, and Americans are too dumb 2 realize
even if u dont believe all the other evidence that it was an inside job ... there can be no doubt that building 7 was a controlled demolition . why cant people see that or am i nuts?...... oh and im still waiting for a shoot of a plane approaching and hitting the pentagon..... one of THE most surveyed buildings in the world
Why would it be unusual for Mr. Silverstein purchase supplemental insurance to specifically protect against a terrorist attack, it's as if the WTC had been a previous target. As for why building 7 was demolished, as long as there is no concrete evidence neither the 9/11 "truthers" or anyone else can say with any authority that they know what happened, I can't tell you how annoying it is to listen to people tell me about Israeli made micro nuclear detonation devices. Get a life you fucking losers
you are all fucking morons! Lee Harvey Oswald and John Wilkes Booth were behind 9/11 everyone knows that. OK.....OK......OK.....just kidding. it was luke skywalker he was the real bastard who took the buildings down! COME ON CONPSIRACY NUT JOBS get out of mommy and daddys basement get a life, get a job, get laid! muslim terrorist did this! FUCKING ENOUGH!!!!!!!! There is NO logic in these arguments!
fo sure there is any lies and secrets hidden,,,,but the guy who took out iinsurance on the trade centre for 2001 means notthing ,,they dont tell that there were pevoius attemts on terroir attcks on the trade centre,,,
If the conspiracy theory is correct, then the explosives would need to be placed on the correct floor before the planes hit. How did the terrorist know exactly where to hit the building with the plane? Count floors on their flight in? Then, wouldn't a plane crashing into the building jeopardize the reliability of the detonation mechanism? That conspiracy theory is just a dumb idea that no one would try to implement because it just would not work.
oh and how the insider trading that went on before that? nah its all cooincendence huh? it was all a "day for firsts". what a bunch of horseshit. history repeats and false flag operations are an integral part of history. lets become awakened adults shall we?
our government isnt original it makes sense theyre attacking itself to justify war, just like seen by Hitler and inspired by the Orsen Wells scare of 1954
@VeronicaLee0x oh and no it doesnt happen magically. its called a black op jackass. you dont think we could pull a black op off on a civilan location? shit "they" were able to hit the Pentagon right? so why would it be so hard for anyone let alone our own covert ops to pull something like this off? it wouldnt, not at fucking all.
And the reason this building is taken down in a CD??!! For what? Your going to spend half a month loading it up with explosives (of which there are ZEEEERO sighs of) have it evacuated on the day. Then some mystery figure somewhere hits the plunger at it collapses??!!.. for what purpose? to crush a bunch of computers and file cabinets?
Yes.. GONE FOREVER!! We will never get those hard drives back.
@roquefortfiles The NIST report which shows WTC7 fell at free fall speed for 8 storeys - only possible explanation is controlled demonlition. Scientific fact, published by the official body responsible for examining the collapse. Case closed.
@GlobalSatori A few problems with that. Absolutely NOTHING in the way of CD materials were found afterward. And this material is EASY to locate. Fuse elements ALWAYS remain. A linear shaped charge is what would be needed to sever the columns. These items do not detonate in silence.
Explain how the chief of FDNY stands in front of this building and it drops..(in his words) without a sound.
Sure.. lots of "Evidence" to support your theory..
@GlobalSatori Dude.. you got it backwards!! There is NOTHING there to support what you are talking about. Those are FACTS!! And you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. CD don't take place MAGICALLY without any apparatus to do it and that material does not MAGICALLY vanish afterward. This stuff is EVERYWHERE afterward.. I been there, i know what it looks like. Trained people were on the pile afterwards. These people suddenly don't know their profession?
@roquefortfiles There is clear evidence of controlled demolition by the freefall collapse. There is clear evidence of explosives from the pieces of thermite found and confirmed by multiple scientific studies. The people who are saying otherwise, like yourself, have been paid to do so. It is no mystery. Those who speak the truth are either fired, discredited or murdered.
@GlobalSatori Oh..yeah i work for the government!! LOL!! For one thing thermite is not an explosive and it is no where NEAR powerful enough to blast a steel column enough to sever it. Are you on crack?? There is a REASON a linear shaped charge is used to do that. It cuts the steel quickly and efficiently. That is WHY conventional explosives are not used for this purpose. The shape charge was designed FOR THAT.
Spend your time looking at what are facts. Not what you WANT them to be.
@roquefortfiles The facts are that the building collapsed at freefall speed for 8 storeys and nothing, not what anyone says, not your claim there is a lack of detonator evidence and regardless of any accusations as to my mental state can change that FACT. What you are dealing in is conjecture. What I'm talking about are physical facts and it is very apparent you cannot face them.
@GlobalSatori I don't have a problem with that. Its what happened. Ron Craig a CD specialist said the connections failed. When you remove one major element of support the rest of the building is in jeopardy. B7 suffered MAJOR damage from WTC 1 when it collapsed. Fires burnt all day with no water to fight them.
But you don't get something for nothing and a CD does not happen "Magically" and the fact of the matter is there is NOTHING there to support it.
LOL. That is priceless. So you are suggesting that because you have not seen evidence of fuses that we should ignore the laws of physics which categorically PROVE the only explanation is a controlled demolition? That's your argument?
@GlobalSatori Are those the same laws that CATEGORICALLY prove the WTC couldn't collapse? (Is it written in some manual some where in the "TRUTH" movement headquarters?.. (B7 AND WTC..NOT ALLOWED TO COLLAPSE..WE FORBADE IT AND SO DO OUR LAWS!!)
If you had a clue as to what your talking about you might understand how silly it is to have this happen and have #1 no sound and #2 no CD debris. Both corroborated by the Chief and Trained people on the pile.
@roquefortfiles Actually I am referring to Newton's Laws of Motion which have been proven correct in classical physics for 300 years. You have been to school right? Even if what you were saying about a lack of sound or CD were true, a body cannot fall at freefall speed if it has ANY opposing force, therefore 8 storeys of 25 columns were instantaneously removed i.e. controlled demolition. It does not matter what the Chief of anything says - the laws of physics are not a matter of opinion.
@GlobalSatori Yeah well. remove major structural supports and it cascades to others now overloaded.
Whatever man. If it gives you comfort to WANT to believe this is a CD.. Great!! ENJOY!!..
(I don't really know what imploding ANY of the 911 buildings accomplishes anyhow besides crushing a few computers but i guess in the "TM" this constitutes a good idea)
Yes the planes were just not enough!!! WE NEED EXPLOSIVES!!
(I... KNOW!! what a load of nonsense it all is.. been there)
@roquefortfiles Yes, that's correct. A real natural collapse would involve stress moving from one member to another taking time and slowing the descent - not a freefall. Explosives needed because the towers were designed to cope with plane strikes and would not have fallen. Larry Silverstein leased the towers in Spring 2001, insured against acts of terror and add the right to REBUILD TOWERS IF DESTROYED in Summer 2001, and then didn't turn up there for a meeting on 9th September 2001? Murderer.
@roquefortfiles no planes were not enough... this is proven by Newton's 3rd law. you and others cannot refute it. if it gives YOU comfort to believe you live in a world were youre on the side of the good guys, then more power to you, or less as the case may be.
@runelord37 Linear shaped charges DO NOT detonate in silence.. absolutely absurd!!. And anyone with any knowledge of CD can instantly tell there is not an explosive in the building. If the WTC were stuffed full of explosives. There would be no need for material to be hurled 3 blocks. Explosives REMOVE the resistance as it falls.. that is why they are used!! The building would fall cleanly to its footprint because lower resistance is being removed.
@roquefortfiles who says they detonated in silence? there were tons of accounts of explosions going off that day? or do you not pay any attention at all. its been fuckin 10 years dude wake the fuck up.also you somehow nullify your own points in the same sentence. material would not have been hurled 3 blocks as it was without an explosive element to the situation. we clearly see concrete reduced to dust while the whole building cascades. no frame left below. stfu already. your an idiot
@runelord37 Explosions? What 45 minutes before they fall? Big deal. There is 10,000 gallons of jet fuel in the building. I am talking about AT COLLAPSE.. Not an hour before. And i don't require a dozen videos to make up my mind. ABC NEWS is across the street when WTC 2 goes. Shooting with PRO gear and not a sound comes from the tower. No explosions.. nothing. Linear charges do not go off in silence. Absolutely ABSURD. Explosives do not pulverize concrete. Gravity does.
@roquefortfiles but that gravity need to be in full acceleration. there was not a goddamn OUNCE of jet fuel in either of those buildings, because the huge majority had burned off on impact of the planes. you really cant grasp that? or that other forms of explosives like nano-thermite are relatively quiet compared to dynamite? there were many many people that heard these lower decibel explosions. many of them survivors from within the structure itself. these are highly specialized demo materials
@runelord37 Oh...! The building collapses and fails along the east wall. Exactly where the plane hit it. Every single one of those columns are still there up until the second of failure. On three floors of obliterated windows blown wide open for all to see across its 210 foot expanse, point out to me where this gigantic "thermite" reaction is taking place? Brighter than a welders torch,.. verging in to the SUPER bright.. ultra violet.
@roquefortfiles so your going to tell me structure fire up top erased the resistance from below? now thats fucking stupid...oh ya and its taking place on the interior where you cant fucking see it dumbass. its not about being open minded, its also about having a reasonable level of intelligence. your answers are flawed and your thinking is not logic based, nor is it sound. where do the core columns go after failure? they crumple like plastic and lose all integrity? ya , keep replying. im done
@runelord37 Floors dude!! Even Les Robertson (architect!) has said they were likely the originating point of the failure. The floors do not hold vertical loads. Only columns do that. The floors provide stability to the columns, like that matrix of criss cross cardboard in a beer case. Without the floors the exterior wall has no chance of holding the loads. Which you can clearly see are bowed inward drastically. The floors are held by a bracket and a 3/4 inch bolt.
@roquefortfiles even with pancake collapse it wouldnt have been close to free fall speed smart guy...it would have taken at least 30 + secs with a real pancake collapse? now i am. lol. there really no way for you to refute these things. its your way of looking at it thats flawed. go ahead and drink the coolaid up. i dont give a fuck. go ahead and get your last word in. thats what children do best.
@runelord37 Building engineers examined one of the WTC complex buildings hit by airplane debris. Not collapse debris,.. airplane debris. They were shocked at what they found. Major support connections had failed across a large areas. This was not supposed to happen according to blue prints etc. It showed them that this stuff is possible much more than they had believed.
B7? Was entirely a "Known" entity by the FDNY it was evacuated BECAUSE of fear of collapse.
Dude.. when a building is CD'd material is ALWAYS left over.. always. There is so much of this stuff that it has to be cleaned up. Fuse delay bundles, blasting caps.. The shit is everywhere and is actually a bit of a nuisance because there is so much of it.
People trained in this field were there at B7 after it fell.
Not one piece of anything related to a CD was found. Nothing.
@runelord37 Linear shaped charges are what would be required to take out these columns. Estimates of 1000 pounds per floor. (ALLOT of explosives!!)
Pay close attention to the START of this video. Not the collapse. BEFORE that is when charges would have to go off. Not a sound!! 700 ft away. With a PROFESSIONAL news camera. Pro audio and picture
@runelord37 I was completely open minded with all of this conspiracy stuff when this took place. I approached it with a .."Ok lets see" frame of mind. All it took for me was to see half a dozen videos of WTC collapse taking place in DEAD SILENCE!!. (I am talking explosions, shape charges).
Beyond absurd!!. the amount of explosives the "TM" would have us believe is in the building would be nothing short of ... MASSIVE!!! On the sound scale.
@runelord37 I know how this is going to go. you "TM" nuts are all the same. We will toss around a few points of view and once i start saying something that you cant understand or challenges your world view too much i'll get the... "BLOCKED".. and you will go back to living in your deluded fantasy land with the likes of Richard Gage and the other "Engineers and Architects and Keystone cops for 911 truth"
Nine minutes and one second of my life I wish I could reclaim.
jaketheoneeyedsnake 1 month ago
I did watch this and the Liberals have edited it and taken so much from it that it only suports the fact that it was a terrorist attack. Brainwashed Liberals don't know that.
ShadowoOfBlood 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ItWasTyped. com - the TRUTH about conspiracy theories & the people who believe them. look under 'conspiracy theories'
culturebully3 1 month ago
The people of my country U.S.A do we even matter to those behind gated communities who would trade the lives of working americans for a 7 billion dollar pay day? Its fucked up
shoboat81 1 month ago
Inside job... Northwood files... does it really even matter? Either way, the average American still has to go to a job every day to try and make ends meet. It's not complacency. It's existence. I'm poor, and I cut and burn metal for a living. I'm not the smartest guy on the planet, but I'm here to tell you that diesel fuel doesn't cut down a skyscraper in 15 minutes.
ions82 2 months ago
This really isn't a strong argument. Of course, you have insurance against terrorism for a WTC building! That happened before. Explosives are used when you demolish a building. After planes hit, the buildings were weak and needed to come down. I've looked at all the 9/11Truth stuff and there are so many holes in the theories. I want to believe the 9/11Truth but I just see it as unintelligent. We are all slaves and we get what they give us. Trying to build out of mass media a truth they gave us?
screenname12341 2 months ago
@screenname12341 I agree that this particular video is a weak argument. Its easy to spin facts and twist words to make any situation appear significantly different than it actually was. That being said, there are a few small things, like no plane bits at the pentagon, which point to us not getting the entire story.
Blasted2Oblivion 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you people are crazy
human151 3 months ago
These bastards killed our own for selfish greedy pleasure.....Execute every last one of these dirtbags.
DanglinSausage 3 months ago 2
This video states, "Blast, shoot, blow and pull are terms used in the demolition industry to refer to bringing down buildings, bridges and other structures." Then the evidence they provide to show that these are terms that are used in demolition, they have them saying blast, shoot and blow, but not pull. /facepalm I hope not many people fell for this video, because this is just one glaring example of what's wrong with this video.
nexus1g 3 months ago
@nexus1g Would you like to look at that video again? "Hello? Oh... we're getting ready to pull building six."
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel Were you even there and watching television and keeping up on this stuff? They were tying cables around the bits that were left standing and literally pulling them down.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g As a matter of fact, being a member ADF, I was very interested in what was going on. I was keenly keeping up with what was going on. And having a family involved in construction, I know a few things about buildings, despite the fact we don't do demolitions. I would love for you to give me an example of where a multi story building is brought down by tying cables around it, and "pulling" that cable.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel They weren't pulling the whole building down, they were pulling down what was left standing. You can find images if you do a simply Google search of the cables around what's left standing of the buildings tied to a digger about to pull it over.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Mate, my initial comment to you was because I thought you were mistaken, and I just wanted to bring the "pull" part of the video to your attention. But I can see now that you are being purposely ignorant. That's fine, it's your choice, but please don't dig your self in deeper with comments like that... it's just silly.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel Watch this: watch?v=stVmEmJ666M I'm on the side with the PM guys. You're on Loose Change's side.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Great vid. As for sides, pretty hard from 7 min to really take sides. Let me set you straight, I'm not a hard line conspiracy theorist. I don't know what happened that day. However, I am on the side of those who ask questions. Not with those who simply accept the "offical" story and leave it at that. Why ask questions? Because there ARE alot of things that don't add up that day. Actually, watch the entire Loose Change doco, it has many, many good questions...
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@nexus1g However, what I find REALLY amazing, is that SO many people are OPPOSED to asking questions... WHY?! There are thousands of Americans being killed. Sons, daughters, siblings... thousands of people from other nations. If even the tiniest little thing didn't add up, wouldn't you want to know? Wouldn't you want to be sure? It's crazy enough imo that ppl aren't asking questions themselves, but to be calling down those that are? Amazing... can't think of another word.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel I have watched the whole video. It was painful to watch because of the blatant intellectual dishonesty and logical fallacies. People aren't opposed to asking questions, but they are opposed to people who haven't done proper research making sensational claims.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Yes, there are some really silly vids out there. To anyone purporting an idea, I ask, prove it. But I think the same onus should go on the officials also, especially if things don't add up. Disregard NORAD, disregard missing pentagon tapes, disregard the Shanksville crash (all BIG items which don't add up); tell me about WTC-7. A building with fire on SOME floors, burns a few hours, then collapses in less then 7 sec symetrically into its footprint? Come on man? That add up?
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel You didn't watch the video I gave you, did you? They cover WTC7.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g I did watch the video. The explanation that a fire caused all of the collumns to simultaniously collapse imo doesn't add up. Also, if you look at videos of WTC-7 collapsing you will see that it actually fell from the bottom. The bottom floors gave first, followed by the rest of the building, all collapsing neatly and symetrically into it's foot print. The explanation given by NIST doesn't explain that, and it was never mentioned in the 9/11 commission report at all.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel "he explanation that a fire caused all of the collumns to simultaniously collapse imo doesn't add up." Well your opinion doesn't really matter here. Facts matter. And no one said the columns simultaneously collapsed at once. And WTC7's internal structure collapsed, first one side then the other then the rest of the building came down. There's videos that show the roof objects falling in as the structure starts to collapse.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel And buildings are designed to fall down, not over, so there's no reason for it to fall over.
You don't know what the 9/11 Commission Report was done for.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission), an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks"... from the front page. Note the work "full and complete account". WTC-7 wasn't a part of 9/11?
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel The Commission was to bring about accountability and faults that allowed 9/11 to happen.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel And what do you mean NORAD and the Shanksville crash don't add up? Of course they do. And why do you expect to see tapes from the PENTAGON of all places?
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g As for NORAD, please look up plane interceptions over US airspace in 2000. Please look up average interception time, and miss rate. Then tell explain to me what happened on 9/11...
Shanksville crash. Look up any photos of airplane crashes, then compare them to the Shanskville one. Does it add up?
Over 80 possible videos that could show what hit Pentagon. Of 5 released, none show clearly what. Why? Especially if it debunks cons? And why does the damage not fit the explanation?
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel First of all, there is no way that a U.S. fighter jet will shoot down an airliner full of civilians whether attacks are happening or not. There are no acceptable sacrifices like that. What if they ended up shooting down the wrong aircraft? Or an aircraft that had its hijackers subdued by the passengers? Let alone that the plane may then crash into other people on the ground. No, that just would never happen.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Actually, you're quite wrong. On ALL points. I urge you to do some research before stating things, but let me enlighten you on a couple of things. NORAD is contacted as soon as a plane, any plane, deviates significantly from it's flight path and/or cannot be contacted, and/or is lost from radar contact. All four planes were constantly tracked by radar so there is no chance of "mistaken identity". If a plane is to hit a target with high civilan casualties, it shouldnt be downed?
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel The hijackers turned off the planes' transponders so, no, they were not identifiable. Any plane in the sky at the time with a malfunctioning transponder could have been the target of being shot down at that point. Do you start to see the problem? And, no, under no circumstances should we fire on a plane full of civilians. EVER. We try to get those in danger out of danger as quickly as possible, but we don't kill civilians.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g In any case, should or shouldn't don't play a part. Prior to 9/11, fighter jets had to get approval from the president, or vp, before shooting down a commercial jet. Considering the time frame between the first plane impact, to the second, let alone third and fourth, they had plenty of time to do so.
Post 9/11, the law was specifically changed so that Air Force generals are authorised to down high jacked commercial jets without consulting the president.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel Again, we get people who are in danger our of danger as quickly as possible. We don't kill civilians under any circumstances -- even if it may seem like the lesser of two evils at the time. The right thing to do is what they did.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel A plane dived straight into the ground, and I'm to compare this to photos of planes in controlled crashes? watch?v=UJb08ZzejAA This is what happens even at a slow speed when an airplane goes into an uncontrolled crash in the ground. Now imagine that, nose first at the speed of sound. You'll be lucky to have any identifiable parts.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Controlled crash? I'm not sure what you mean by that, but here is an interesting fact. There has NEVER been an air crash with ANY similarity to that of the fourth plane. In all manner of accidents, be they mid air explosions, mid air collisions, ground crashes from high or low altitude (and if it's high altitude, it is high speed) there has ALWAYS been left over, indentifiable wreckage, and bodies. Nither was present at Shanskville.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel A controlled crash is a crash in which the plane had to "land" in an unfavorable location like water, forest, field, etc. Planes typically don't just drop like rocks when something goes wrong.
High altitude doesn't mean high speed. And your evidence is highly anecdotal. Please reform your argument.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel The last thing the government needs to concern itself with is debunking ignorant people who haven't done their research properly. And it doesn't matter if you have a video of a plane hitting it or not. A plane did, people on the plane died, people saw it, just because you don't have a video doesn't mean anything. There was a swath of damage through the Pentagon. That's a large, heavy object that hit it to carry that much energy through the building.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Asking for evidence, especially under the Freedom of Information Act, is not ignorant, and the government most definitely needs to concern itself with it's people. It most certanly DOES matter if there is a video of the plane, since that would show exactly what and how hit the Pentagon, rather than saying, "trust me, it was this plane". Even a court of law doesn't work that way. You need evidence, and the evidence of the plane is missing. No wreckage.
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel A plane hit the Pentagon. Why do you doubt that? Even in Loose Change they show a turbine fan from the engine of the plane on the lawn of the Pentagon.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g As for the swath of damage... well, let's look at that. What about the LACK of damage on the lawn? Lack of fusalage? Lack of Engines? Lack of damage consistant with a large plane hitting in the way it was explained? What about the exit hole at the back which was also never explained, and cannot be explained if was a plane?
IturaldeRodel 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel Why would there be damage to the lawn? The lawn right in front of the building wasn't mint, so there was some damage close to the impact as would be expected. Why would there even be a fuselage left? Did you watch the second video I linked you? As I said, even in Loose Change there's a picture of a turbine fan at the Pentagon. The damage was consistent. The exit hole is explainable. You didn't watch the first video I sent you.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@IturaldeRodel I don't know why I'm even bothering arguing with you when you're bringing things up that was already disproved in the videos I sent you (which you clearly didn't watch). You're ignorant and stubborn, and you like being that way.
nexus1g 1 month ago
obviously the mayor wouldnt hide in his secret panic room if its right beside where the attack took place its ony common sense
figgywurmack 3 months ago
Well ofcourse anybody would have insured against a terrorist attack for such a iconic and important landmark. thats common sense!
rupertreddle 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UK CITIZENS VERY URGENT - Babar Ahmad is the longest detained without trial British citizen, now in his eighth year behind bars fighting against extradition to the US. He was beaten up by the British police when he was arrested. We need 100,000 signatures by 10/11/11 and Parliament will debate putting Babar on trial in the UK where he is more likely to get a fair trial. Visit freebabarahmad website for the link. Please spread.
smuk1900 3 months ago
There is to much evidence screaming it's an inside job. Time to start the court trials for all the evil culprits.
vipnon1965 3 months ago 15
This has been flagged as spam show
@vipnon1965 No there's not.
TheHungrySnail 2 months ago
@vipnon1965 There's no evidence of that, and all the evidence is to the contrary of it being an inside job.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Yes Pigs do fly too :))
vipnon1965 1 month ago
@vipnon1965 You just listen to half-truths and outright fabrications. That's why you think it's an inside job. If you took time to verify the facts, you'd find that the conspiracy theorists are full of it to the brim.
nexus1g 1 month ago
Watch this video - Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens " & listen to the guy really well a few times & then listen to
Alex Jones again in the video above. They have the same tone, like its a complete staged act. IMO Alex Jones is a NWO Plant, a Pied Piper of sorts, leading the people to become angry at the Govt & to demonstrate. Of coarse He will say it must be
peaceful, but how many people are going to be able to hold back once they know
what Alex has told them???
madderthanalex 3 months ago
those 7,000,000,000 should be spread equally to the families that lost loved ones. Sounds to me like Population Control and World Order which is the control of the Middle East
1roiboi 3 months ago
The ignorance that prevails in the US is very very scary! when 9/11 happened I was only 16 and with zero notion of engineering or architectural knowledge I thought myself: how is possible that 2 steel towers collapse by just being hit by a plane of that dimension in the top of the tower? Then why is the US attacking Afghanistan? And then Why is it attacking Iraq? and all these Americans would solve those questions by watching TV! American leaders are a very evil cancer for the planet! Not off
abstractadonis 4 months ago 14
Comment removed
punkyhiphopdood 4 months ago
@abstractadonis while i believe it was an inside job it really looks like the building fell from the plane impacts and fuel fires and not bombs. if u watch from all angles u can see the building break right where the plane hit and the top falls on the bottom half and demolishes it... people claim there was bombs in the lobby but if u watch closely the lobby is the last bit of the building to go.... world trade centre 7 on the other hand goes down very suspiciously from all angles
figgywurmack 3 months ago
@figgywurmack if you examine wtc2 going down frame by frame you will see that it was demolition. on t.v. and even on most youtube videos it falls way to fast to actually see the demolition in action, but for the record you can see the building being blown out before the top fell on it.
vengencefrom1979 3 months ago
@abstractadonis You have these questions because you were ignorant. You have zero knowledge of engineering and architecture -- stick with that and don't jump to conclusions. The war in Iraq was completely unrelated to 9/11 and had been a situation that had been boiling for 10 years prior to 9/11. The United States attacked Afghanistan because that is where Osama bin Laden made his home. We told the Taliban to give up Osama. They refused. We attacked.
nexus1g 3 months ago
The buildings were defintely demolished. You are such a naive individual if you can not understand that.
TheJmac777 4 months ago
@TheJmac777 This is what I call intellectual blackmail. Make a statement, provide no support for said statement and then state that only idiots would disagree with the statement. Definitely a logical fallacy.
nexus1g 1 month ago
People still care about 9/11?
MyCrownOfWorms 4 months ago
@MyCrownOfWorms people will care until the killers and liars are punished and after that they will care for remembrance of evil human nature.
berletka 3 months ago
@berletka Well, aren't you just a cute little freedom fighter :3
MyCrownOfWorms 3 months ago
@MyCrownOfWorms i wish i could be a fighter but i thing i am cute some times ;) and you??? do you care???? or you just crisps eater and tv scam fan
berletka 3 months ago
@berletka How can you support these causes when you can't even use the English language properly?
MyCrownOfWorms 3 months ago
@MyCrownOfWorms well i can, even when i can't use English properly i still care ...... how can you not care when you use English properly ?????
berletka 3 months ago
@berletka There you go again making little sense and making extremely poor use of the language. Until you can get your ideas out there clearly, quit wasting my time.
MyCrownOfWorms 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MyCrownOfWorms if you do not understand what i am saying it is clear that you would not understand 9/11 consequences, go watch some advertisements and serials and do not forget about crisps
berletka 3 months ago
@MyCrownOfWorms English is clearly not his first language, and somehow you think that speaking multiple languages is grounds for questioning someone's intellect? And he made an excellent point. His use of the English language has as much to do with whether one cares about 9/11 or not as what kind of toothpaste you use.
I was able to understand. I guess since you weren't capable of comprehending what he was saying, then it's your intelligence that is really in question.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g tl;dr
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
@MyCrownOfWorms That's highly unfortunate two paragraphs is too long for you. School must have really been hard for you.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Nay, if simply comes down to my care being zero.
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
@MyCrownOfWorms I like how it suddenly hit zero when you're shamed.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g It's been zero since my first comment on this video. Fucking with 9/11ers is just too easy.
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
@MyCrownOfWorms What, pray tell, is a 9/11er?
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g People who give a shit about this bolognium.
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
@MyCrownOfWorms Why don't you?
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g Because it doesnt matter.
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
@MyCrownOfWorms Of all the things that have happened on this planet in recent history, it's one of the things that truly do matter. The fall of the Soviet Union, Berlin Wall coming down, the splitting of Sudan, the attacks on 9/11... These are defining moments of history to the world. If anything is important, then it is events like these.
nexus1g 1 month ago
@nexus1g That honestly made me laugh. You funny guy, I kill you last.
MyCrownOfWorms 1 month ago
PEOPLE WERE IN THAT BUILDING THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO DESTROY AND THEY KNEW WHEN THOSE TOWERS FELL THAT IT WOULD RELEASE ALL TYPES OF POISONS TOXINS AND PRODUCTS!!!! WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE THEY WANT US DEAD!!! ITS NOT SPECULATION OR PARANOIA ITS REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only1BlancaVixen 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do people still believe that it was Bin laden? I mean come on
MrTorch247 4 months ago
What was in those WTC buildings that the government wanted to destroy so badly?
MDSVes 4 months ago
orson wells did it just to see if he could...technology being what it was then could be used as mass mind control. Hitler did it minus the technology. but your point is well taken Veronica
runelord37 4 months ago
paranoid much? some people will fall for anything.
wantabraptured 4 months ago
the richman owner sounds like mr burns from the simpsons
vergajo222 4 months ago
/watch?v=4-tkBzcIb28
LOWRIDER4UNATL 4 months ago
Watch all to this if you want the truth or to attempt to debunk!
/watch?v=hVaGht6eHoQ
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist 9/11
OH Get real your gene pool is made up of the exact same people inbreed mutant yukky ... Your country is built up with blood money so blow a pipe out ya ass mofo ! My country don't need you's as an ally because far as i'm concerned all your country wants is WAR and no thanks pathetic how innocent people died and all you can do is defend the monsters who did it ! As for history America hasn't spared a few yrs between wars ???
TheJodee21 4 months ago
Shows how DUMB Americans are
TheJodee21 4 months ago 2
@TheJodee21 man, stfu. You are from a gene pool made up by rapist, homosexuals, criminals and such...the fucking scum the empire no longer wanted and shipped off to an island far far away - so if I were you, I wouldnt run my lips so tough on the internet. You are worthless, w/o the US as an Ally, your pos island would no longer be "yours" and your state language would be russian or Chinese...think about history for a bit before letting the shit in your brain spill out.
USMCSRIG 4 months ago
@USMCSRIG to be honest...being shipped off by the Empire of Britain is a mark of honor if nothing else. at least by the logic of your reasoning, so just stfu already. Youre a Roman apologist. this is my country as well, but im not asleep assshole. keep believing in the dream when its already been hijacked and traumatically transformed into some egregious and unrecognizable.
runelord37 4 months ago
What documentary is this from ?? when i first watched i was a believer ! inside job
TheJodee21 5 months ago
blood money for who?the govt said? talk to the hand........my other hand is holding all that insurance money and the comonation to the gold that was in the trade center.gold vault somewhere ?
orione56567 5 months ago
jews mossad from zionist israel did it. jews in charge of clearing all wreckage debries, jews plotted every modern war, financial crisis, and in the end, the extermination of most of gentiles who they consider animals. talmud a satanic book judaism a satanic cult, jews , freemasons, CIA , fema , AIPAc, responsible for most of world crimes
blaztmarket 5 months ago
@blaztmarket skinhead, you sound like a fucking nazi. Quit blaming the jews for everything. If a waiter drops your freaking food, i bet you'd blame the jews then too! Ass hole, Jewish people are good people they aren't out to seek destruction.
GrenMoyo 5 months ago
@blaztmarket clearly your balls only drop online
LordKaisen 5 months ago
Take your eyes off the Jews and put them onto the roman catholic organization,then you might be onto something
sharnirose 5 months ago
Just 1 thing when the first plane hit the tower why were there no fighter jets or helicopters to the crash site? why they did not shoot down the second plane? Why they attack then a country and occupy it for "peace keeping"? it should be Oil taking not keeping.... USA is a fucking greedy country and needs to stop and think about it that there are other countries and ppl out there not just them. AND i dont wanna offend the ppl living there its not your fault you are just a tool of many.
xXE4GLEyEXx 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MilitantPatriot com (Owned and operated by former Military personnel)
- Against all forms of Corruption (Federal Reserve/ UN / IRS / CFR )
- Against Police brutality/ Martial law
- Against New World Order/ the Elite/ illuminati/ Global Government
- Against Socialism, Fascism, Communism
anthonyontherocks 5 months ago
I am sure 911 was an inside job. I liked it, especially the pentagon getting missiled. Talk about shooting themselves in the foot. I wish more insurance salesmen died though, most of the people in the towers were on my deserves to die list. I had just gotten out of prison for a drug crime. I saw it as a well deserved reward by Karma herself. I laughed and cheered. I swear to god (me). LOL. Not the devil of the bible whose way to right a wrong is to kill something innocent. (jew god)
AJollyGoodFelon 5 months ago
So he decides to call up Osama?
jimmie481000 5 months ago
larry silverstein, you will most certianlly burn in hell you sick fucker, blood money scumbag...
drummingfordrunks 5 months ago
@drummingfordrunks Exactly what i was thinking
TheJmac777 4 months ago
guys chek out my channel your suport means alot
much respect
Chedah.
therisky666 5 months ago
I'm always wondering, why they haven't blow building 7 while the north tower collapsed, this would be the easiest way to hide what exact causes the collapse! This makes no sense, even if i convinced that he really mean pull in order to bring it down, you can see it in his eyes as he spoke out!
74pbg 5 months ago
for me it was the counter-intuitive agruments involving building 7 vs the towers. in the case of the towers, they claimed it would take WEEKS to rig a building to drop in its footprint yet when building 7 is mentioned, well hell, they rigged and dropped THAT edifice in a matter of hours. You can't have the lie point both ways in the same breath. At best, it was a colossal case of incompetence on the part of our "intelligence" community at worst, the fucks are complicit!
liljgoneman 5 months ago
Why would Giuliani want to find shelter in a building that was 1) damaged and 2) right next to two buildings that were just hit by planes? That argument makes no sense to me.
belowthepovertyline 5 months ago
it was not an inside job, they just knew they were going to do it and let it happen. do you think pearl harbor was any different? its easier to get involved in a war when you are attacked first.
Marsdevilsvolta 5 months ago
@Marsdevilsvolta You should check out the movie loose change. It's really eye opening and points out a lot of weird coincidences that took place on that day.
koalalauncher 5 months ago
What I mean is that plenty of videos with conclusions backed by nothing but suspicion and a filtered view, such as this, tend to be censored.
PsychoticSnake 5 months ago
I'm impressed that you allow people who say otherwise to you, to actually say otherwise.
PsychoticSnake 5 months ago
if you guys believe or are interested in this and believe there is way more behind the government (not only having to do with the 9/11) and all that good stuff you should watch the "Zeitgeist" films. they're filled with information
TurtalTheManWife 6 months ago
He said pull it because he was worried about the fire?
THIS BLATANTLY MEANS THAT HIS PEOPLE HAD ACCESS TO EXPLOSIVES INSIDE THE BUILDING
GOD ITS SO OBVIOUS!!!
LarryFlynn22 6 months ago
@Superhero6734ify they killed osama bin laden on may 1st, The patriot act, which Obama absolutely hated during his campain was set to expire on may 31. Obama killed Osama, raised the terror alert status and signed the Patriot Act for another four years. You may want to add Barak Obama to your terrorist list.
damaniseman 6 months ago
@nightwolf9100 yea i know all about that, and on the 27th floor i believe it was, there was a SECRET BUNKER FOR BASICALLY ALL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO GO IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY; and they blew it up!
This could've been where it was pulled off, because otherwise why destroy that building??
bradn6919 6 months ago
VOTE RON PAUL, MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS AND PROTECT OUR OWN BOARDERS.
MrDanimul6 6 months ago
all of you... are misinformed nut cases... all of you...
spikemugen22 7 months ago
@spikemugen22 Project northwoods, read about it. we profit from war. vietnam another example
MrDanimul6 6 months ago
@MrDanimul6 I realize that but that does not have to do with anything
spikemugen22 6 months ago
at 3:20 you can see staged explosions in this video
clrush47 7 months ago
When Silverstein said "pull it" he was talking about his finger
gd44 7 months ago
If I do remember osama bin laden made a video admitting to the attack you god damn nut cases
kamakazininja69 7 months ago
@kamakazininja69 Logic doesn't exist for you does it?
Urabus08 7 months ago
@kamakazininja69 Actually a second video came out a week or 2 later saying he WAS NOT responsible.
And when you look at the video where he "admits it", 'Osama' is shooting guns, eating, and gesturing with his right hand....
Osama Bin Laden was left-handed! And when you look at the video, he is about 4-6 inches smaller than OBL, and about 40 pounds heavier.
Experts even said that the accent that he spoke with proved that he was from Jordan
bradn6919 7 months ago
@kamakazininja69
And one more thing: Bush said that he said he saw the video of the first plane hitting the WTC before he went to read to the kids at the school... (video of this is on youtube)
Problem is, not ONE video that captured the first plane hitting the WTC was aired on 9/11, the videos were shown on 9/12....
And why won't they release a video that SHOWS what hit the pentagon? Only explosions.
Bin Laden is just another Lee Harvey Oswald, a patsy, and Americans are too dumb 2 realize
bradn6919 7 months ago
@kamakazininja69
There are no videos, nor anything else connecting Bin Laden with 9/11.
Otherwise, the FBI would have charged him with the crime, and they never did.
Go ahead, find some hard evidence on-line connecting him with the crime, and share it with us.
smujismuj 7 months ago
even if u dont believe all the other evidence that it was an inside job ... there can be no doubt that building 7 was a controlled demolition . why cant people see that or am i nuts?...... oh and im still waiting for a shoot of a plane approaching and hitting the pentagon..... one of THE most surveyed buildings in the world
imawakeish 7 months ago
Why would it be unusual for Mr. Silverstein purchase supplemental insurance to specifically protect against a terrorist attack, it's as if the WTC had been a previous target. As for why building 7 was demolished, as long as there is no concrete evidence neither the 9/11 "truthers" or anyone else can say with any authority that they know what happened, I can't tell you how annoying it is to listen to people tell me about Israeli made micro nuclear detonation devices. Get a life you fucking losers
maleki9 8 months ago
you are all fucking morons! Lee Harvey Oswald and John Wilkes Booth were behind 9/11 everyone knows that. OK.....OK......OK.....just kidding. it was luke skywalker he was the real bastard who took the buildings down! COME ON CONPSIRACY NUT JOBS get out of mommy and daddys basement get a life, get a job, get laid! muslim terrorist did this! FUCKING ENOUGH!!!!!!!! There is NO logic in these arguments!
hanvin375 8 months ago in playlist 9-11& Big Bro
@hanvin375 last i heard it was Elvis in a Michael Jackson outfit
Barre76 7 months ago
wake up !!!
Zofrane2011 8 months ago
fo sure there is any lies and secrets hidden,,,,but the guy who took out iinsurance on the trade centre for 2001 means notthing ,,they dont tell that there were pevoius attemts on terroir attcks on the trade centre,,,
davejones8 8 months ago
csb
PETAVER 8 months ago
If the conspiracy theory is correct, then the explosives would need to be placed on the correct floor before the planes hit. How did the terrorist know exactly where to hit the building with the plane? Count floors on their flight in? Then, wouldn't a plane crashing into the building jeopardize the reliability of the detonation mechanism? That conspiracy theory is just a dumb idea that no one would try to implement because it just would not work.
coolgreyoneabby 8 months ago
oh and how the insider trading that went on before that? nah its all cooincendence huh? it was all a "day for firsts". what a bunch of horseshit. history repeats and false flag operations are an integral part of history. lets become awakened adults shall we?
runelord37 8 months ago
our government isnt original it makes sense theyre attacking itself to justify war, just like seen by Hitler and inspired by the Orsen Wells scare of 1954
VeronicaLee0x 8 months ago
@VeronicaLee0x oh and no it doesnt happen magically. its called a black op jackass. you dont think we could pull a black op off on a civilan location? shit "they" were able to hit the Pentagon right? so why would it be so hard for anyone let alone our own covert ops to pull something like this off? it wouldnt, not at fucking all.
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 wtf are you talking about im saying 9/11 is an inside job watch who you called a dumbass dipshit
VeronicaLee0x 4 months ago
@VeronicaLee0x Lol...sorry. i must have clicked response to the wrong person..chill if you know im not talking to you, dang lady ;)
runelord37 4 months ago
And the reason this building is taken down in a CD??!! For what? Your going to spend half a month loading it up with explosives (of which there are ZEEEERO sighs of) have it evacuated on the day. Then some mystery figure somewhere hits the plunger at it collapses??!!.. for what purpose? to crush a bunch of computers and file cabinets?
Yes.. GONE FOREVER!! We will never get those hard drives back.
This constitutes a good idea in the "TM" brain.
Bunch of fucking morons if you ask me.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles Your guesses and conjecture about motives is irrelevant. The scientific evidence is what's relevant.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori And what is that "Scientific" evidence?. Backed up by hard data.
Tell us all.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles The NIST report which shows WTC7 fell at free fall speed for 8 storeys - only possible explanation is controlled demonlition. Scientific fact, published by the official body responsible for examining the collapse. Case closed.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori A few problems with that. Absolutely NOTHING in the way of CD materials were found afterward. And this material is EASY to locate. Fuse elements ALWAYS remain. A linear shaped charge is what would be needed to sever the columns. These items do not detonate in silence.
Explain how the chief of FDNY stands in front of this building and it drops..(in his words) without a sound.
Sure.. lots of "Evidence" to support your theory..
(try NONE!!)
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles You are trying to use conjecture, opinion and circumstantial evidence to refute scientific proof. That is pathetic.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori Dude.. you got it backwards!! There is NOTHING there to support what you are talking about. Those are FACTS!! And you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. CD don't take place MAGICALLY without any apparatus to do it and that material does not MAGICALLY vanish afterward. This stuff is EVERYWHERE afterward.. I been there, i know what it looks like. Trained people were on the pile afterwards. These people suddenly don't know their profession?
Your on glue
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles There is clear evidence of controlled demolition by the freefall collapse. There is clear evidence of explosives from the pieces of thermite found and confirmed by multiple scientific studies. The people who are saying otherwise, like yourself, have been paid to do so. It is no mystery. Those who speak the truth are either fired, discredited or murdered.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori Oh..yeah i work for the government!! LOL!! For one thing thermite is not an explosive and it is no where NEAR powerful enough to blast a steel column enough to sever it. Are you on crack?? There is a REASON a linear shaped charge is used to do that. It cuts the steel quickly and efficiently. That is WHY conventional explosives are not used for this purpose. The shape charge was designed FOR THAT.
Spend your time looking at what are facts. Not what you WANT them to be.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles The facts are that the building collapsed at freefall speed for 8 storeys and nothing, not what anyone says, not your claim there is a lack of detonator evidence and regardless of any accusations as to my mental state can change that FACT. What you are dealing in is conjecture. What I'm talking about are physical facts and it is very apparent you cannot face them.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori I don't have a problem with that. Its what happened. Ron Craig a CD specialist said the connections failed. When you remove one major element of support the rest of the building is in jeopardy. B7 suffered MAJOR damage from WTC 1 when it collapsed. Fires burnt all day with no water to fight them.
But you don't get something for nothing and a CD does not happen "Magically" and the fact of the matter is there is NOTHING there to support it.
YOU don't want to face that.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
LOL. That is priceless. So you are suggesting that because you have not seen evidence of fuses that we should ignore the laws of physics which categorically PROVE the only explanation is a controlled demolition? That's your argument?
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori Are those the same laws that CATEGORICALLY prove the WTC couldn't collapse? (Is it written in some manual some where in the "TRUTH" movement headquarters?.. (B7 AND WTC..NOT ALLOWED TO COLLAPSE..WE FORBADE IT AND SO DO OUR LAWS!!)
If you had a clue as to what your talking about you might understand how silly it is to have this happen and have #1 no sound and #2 no CD debris. Both corroborated by the Chief and Trained people on the pile.
Its a load of nonsense fella!!
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles Actually I am referring to Newton's Laws of Motion which have been proven correct in classical physics for 300 years. You have been to school right? Even if what you were saying about a lack of sound or CD were true, a body cannot fall at freefall speed if it has ANY opposing force, therefore 8 storeys of 25 columns were instantaneously removed i.e. controlled demolition. It does not matter what the Chief of anything says - the laws of physics are not a matter of opinion.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori Yeah well. remove major structural supports and it cascades to others now overloaded.
Whatever man. If it gives you comfort to WANT to believe this is a CD.. Great!! ENJOY!!..
(I don't really know what imploding ANY of the 911 buildings accomplishes anyhow besides crushing a few computers but i guess in the "TM" this constitutes a good idea)
Yes the planes were just not enough!!! WE NEED EXPLOSIVES!!
(I... KNOW!! what a load of nonsense it all is.. been there)
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles Yes, that's correct. A real natural collapse would involve stress moving from one member to another taking time and slowing the descent - not a freefall. Explosives needed because the towers were designed to cope with plane strikes and would not have fallen. Larry Silverstein leased the towers in Spring 2001, insured against acts of terror and add the right to REBUILD TOWERS IF DESTROYED in Summer 2001, and then didn't turn up there for a meeting on 9th September 2001? Murderer.
GlobalSatori 8 months ago
@GlobalSatori Right!!!
Over.. and out!!
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles no planes were not enough... this is proven by Newton's 3rd law. you and others cannot refute it. if it gives YOU comfort to believe you live in a world were youre on the side of the good guys, then more power to you, or less as the case may be.
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 Linear shaped charges DO NOT detonate in silence.. absolutely absurd!!. And anyone with any knowledge of CD can instantly tell there is not an explosive in the building. If the WTC were stuffed full of explosives. There would be no need for material to be hurled 3 blocks. Explosives REMOVE the resistance as it falls.. that is why they are used!! The building would fall cleanly to its footprint because lower resistance is being removed.
That is not what we see happening.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles who says they detonated in silence? there were tons of accounts of explosions going off that day? or do you not pay any attention at all. its been fuckin 10 years dude wake the fuck up.also you somehow nullify your own points in the same sentence. material would not have been hurled 3 blocks as it was without an explosive element to the situation. we clearly see concrete reduced to dust while the whole building cascades. no frame left below. stfu already. your an idiot
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 Explosions? What 45 minutes before they fall? Big deal. There is 10,000 gallons of jet fuel in the building. I am talking about AT COLLAPSE.. Not an hour before. And i don't require a dozen videos to make up my mind. ABC NEWS is across the street when WTC 2 goes. Shooting with PRO gear and not a sound comes from the tower. No explosions.. nothing. Linear charges do not go off in silence. Absolutely ABSURD. Explosives do not pulverize concrete. Gravity does.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles but that gravity need to be in full acceleration. there was not a goddamn OUNCE of jet fuel in either of those buildings, because the huge majority had burned off on impact of the planes. you really cant grasp that? or that other forms of explosives like nano-thermite are relatively quiet compared to dynamite? there were many many people that heard these lower decibel explosions. many of them survivors from within the structure itself. these are highly specialized demo materials
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 Oh...! The building collapses and fails along the east wall. Exactly where the plane hit it. Every single one of those columns are still there up until the second of failure. On three floors of obliterated windows blown wide open for all to see across its 210 foot expanse, point out to me where this gigantic "thermite" reaction is taking place? Brighter than a welders torch,.. verging in to the SUPER bright.. ultra violet.
Show me where that is happening?
I see nothing
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles so your going to tell me structure fire up top erased the resistance from below? now thats fucking stupid...oh ya and its taking place on the interior where you cant fucking see it dumbass. its not about being open minded, its also about having a reasonable level of intelligence. your answers are flawed and your thinking is not logic based, nor is it sound. where do the core columns go after failure? they crumple like plastic and lose all integrity? ya , keep replying. im done
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 Floors dude!! Even Les Robertson (architect!) has said they were likely the originating point of the failure. The floors do not hold vertical loads. Only columns do that. The floors provide stability to the columns, like that matrix of criss cross cardboard in a beer case. Without the floors the exterior wall has no chance of holding the loads. Which you can clearly see are bowed inward drastically. The floors are held by a bracket and a 3/4 inch bolt.
Are you still done?
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles even with pancake collapse it wouldnt have been close to free fall speed smart guy...it would have taken at least 30 + secs with a real pancake collapse? now i am. lol. there really no way for you to refute these things. its your way of looking at it thats flawed. go ahead and drink the coolaid up. i dont give a fuck. go ahead and get your last word in. thats what children do best.
runelord37 8 months ago
@runelord37 Building engineers examined one of the WTC complex buildings hit by airplane debris. Not collapse debris,.. airplane debris. They were shocked at what they found. Major support connections had failed across a large areas. This was not supposed to happen according to blue prints etc. It showed them that this stuff is possible much more than they had believed.
B7? Was entirely a "Known" entity by the FDNY it was evacuated BECAUSE of fear of collapse.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@runelord37 Reasonable level of intelligence? !!
Dude.. when a building is CD'd material is ALWAYS left over.. always. There is so much of this stuff that it has to be cleaned up. Fuse delay bundles, blasting caps.. The shit is everywhere and is actually a bit of a nuisance because there is so much of it.
People trained in this field were there at B7 after it fell.
Not one piece of anything related to a CD was found. Nothing.
You want to talk Logic still. Or are you done?
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@runelord37 Linear shaped charges are what would be required to take out these columns. Estimates of 1000 pounds per floor. (ALLOT of explosives!!)
Pay close attention to the START of this video. Not the collapse. BEFORE that is when charges would have to go off. Not a sound!! 700 ft away. With a PROFESSIONAL news camera. Pro audio and picture
watch?v=0IvicKnhANs
Now a CD shot from nearly 1800 feet away
watch?v=YIDPoEMk9V0&feature=related
So loud the mic can't handle it!!
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@runelord37 I was completely open minded with all of this conspiracy stuff when this took place. I approached it with a .."Ok lets see" frame of mind. All it took for me was to see half a dozen videos of WTC collapse taking place in DEAD SILENCE!!. (I am talking explosions, shape charges).
Beyond absurd!!. the amount of explosives the "TM" would have us believe is in the building would be nothing short of ... MASSIVE!!! On the sound scale.
I have been there and i know!!. Its a joke
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@runelord37 I know how this is going to go. you "TM" nuts are all the same. We will toss around a few points of view and once i start saying something that you cant understand or challenges your world view too much i'll get the... "BLOCKED".. and you will go back to living in your deluded fantasy land with the likes of Richard Gage and the other "Engineers and Architects and Keystone cops for 911 truth"
You are ALL so predictable. And ill informed.
Just do it now get it over with.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago