Added: 2 years ago
From: smithnya
Views: 4,320
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • none of the other 4000 officers behind kennedy match up with those spots? come on.

  • Oh by the way they doubled check those scientist findings to make sure they were positive about 4 shots being fired they All said they were 95% accurate and all of sudden this dale myers says some bs that differs and everthing said back than was wrong? I don't think so

  • Fuckin Annoying ass docu that discovery channel pulled from their ass to cover the government no way in hell this guy can pinpoint exactly where the officer was actually at I will believe what was said in 1978 their was 4 shots cuz that makes way more sense than this bullshit.

  • this was proven to be false.

  • who knows but he was killed not by oswald

  • I do believe that a front shot took place, but The 4th shot or the 4th noise on the recording could have been his head exploding.

  • Wait a second. Dale myers is back to his old bag of tricks. How do we know the synchronization of the lower left film w/ the z film is accurate? He is using gross aproximation to "guess" where mcclain is and passing it off as fact. Are we really supposed to believe that 4 suspect gunshots w/ perfect acoustic signatures as well as matching attenuation patterns can all be a coincidence? Only an infant would think like that....oh wait it's Dale Myers.

  • drill bAby drill

  • guvment tryin to block this video

  • CT'ers have been "hanging their hat" on the peg of acoustic evidence for years. This video clearly removes that peg and eliminates it as their so-called "proof" of a second gunman and the claim of conspiracy.

    It's been nearly 50 years since the assassination and with all the noise the CT'ers have been making for the past half century we're still waiting for their evidence that shows a conspiracy took place.

    It doesn't exist for one simple reason: A non event leaves no evidence.

  • It is impossible for the shooter to have fired from the front. The mess you see on the front of JFK's head is a fucking exit wound. Anyone who says there was a second shooter knows diddly shit about guns, bullets or their effects.

  • @yesiamawizardjonny What most of the doctors saw, is a massiv exit wound at JFKs back of the head. Maybe you should inform...

  • The problem with Dale Myers theory is that the person he identifies as Officer McClain may be Officer Courson instead. Nice try though.

  • that does not mean shit, someone else could have left their microphone, that simple.

  • I have to believe that a plaza of brick and stone buildings creates perfect conditions for sound echoing, causing some people to think they heard more shots than were actually fired.

  • @DevSodDribble That is, in a nutshell, what happened. But a conspiracy involving every one and their mothers appeals to the masses.

  • @smithnya Exactly. I live in a complex of brick apartment buildings, and the 4th of July firecrackers echo from every brick, sounding like there are 5 times as many going off. A 47 year old muddy recording of something similar could easily be misinterpreted.

  • @DevSodDribble I actually included that point in the video I'm working on disproving the second shooter theory.

  • the dictaphone clicks and pops were one minute after the shooting and you can hear chief Bill Decker instructing his men.

  • Bill Decker is on another channel where the recording was starting and stopping with transmissions, the channel that recorded the shots was running continuously because the microphone was keyed continuously.

    What are the odds noise could line up and correlate within 1 millisec of recorded test shots echoes for 4 shots? Almost ZERO.

    What that means is that the odds are over whelming the recrorded did capture the echoes which will PROVE conspiracy.

    WHY THE LIES? Easily answered now!

  • there was no conspiracy except the one in LHO's fevered mind

  • I can and HAVE PROVEN otherwise, LHO could not have acted alone.

    You are going to be amazed how simple the truth is, guys like Vince Bugliosi will be destroyed by it.

    Part of the lie is that we can't know the truth, I'm gong to show that is simply not true. In fact, History will look back on this story like we look back on those who thought the Earth was flat.

  • @SCGATOR2001 PM me of your so called proof of a second shooter. I will shoot it down in one message. Be prepared to get owned buddy.

  • @SCGATOR2001 Yes, it´s easily answered, but the CIA-Agents all around here at Youtube, still get paid.

  • The acoustic evidence has been disproven on so many counts, I can't believe it still gets such attention. Dale Myer's synchronization of the assassination films alone drives a fatal stake into it.

  • What is "Acousic" evidence?

  • @bapyou Acoustic evidence refers to the only audio recording that was made in Dealey Plaza during the assassination. The recording was of the police radio. A microphone on a motorcycle was keyed to transmit several minutes before to after the shooting.

    Look at my video THE BIG LIE and I show you that the sound recording does align to the Zapruder Film, if you look at SOLVING THE BIGGEST MYSTERY you'll see the alignment explained, it shows the US Government has finally been caught in their lie

  • Yeah, I know what the word "acoustic" means. I was trying to bring to the attention of the poster that he spelled the word incorrectly in the video title. Notice he's corrected it. It used to read "acousic."

  • Do you realize that the acoustic evidence has been proven to be valid, i.e. it did capture the sounds of the shots?

    Knowing that, then you know there were five shots and they were fired by three different people. You can say that is true as the odds are astronomical the recording was made in Dealey Plaza during the shooting.

    This will not make sense until you realize that many things in the JFK assassination are not mysteries, they are lies.

  • Do you realize that my initial comment on this video had nothing to do with the "evidence"? My initial comment had to do with proper spelling.

    Cheers.

  • @Scgator2001,

    Um, no it hasn't. It's been very controversial at best.

    1978 - HSCA, based on the dictabelt, conclude that it there was a conspiracy (and more then 1 shooter)

    1978 - Sprague finds potential flaws in the HSCA analysis

    2001 - Donald Thomas in Science and Justice concludes that the HSCA was probably correct.

    2003 - O'Dell finds errors in Thomas' conclusions

    2003 - Court TV finds that the dictabelt sounds do not match recorded test sounds.

    2003 - ABC tv conclude that it could not...

  • ... have come from Dealey Plaza.

    2005 - Work commenced on restoring the audio and digitising it, as the original recording was deteriorating vastly.

  • @bersaba You left out the most important conclusions, reached by the National Academy of Sciences panel, based on musician Steve Barber's discovery, which included two Nobel prize winning physicists on the Committee on Ballistic Acoustics. They proved the dictabelt contains NO gunshots, based upon speech that was coming from the channel 2 police radio. Barber was on both Court TV 2003, and PBS' Nova 1988 JFK specials

  • @IwshIcldstrtover

    Firstly not an expert on the matter (and am firmly in the middle, I'm not sure if it was a conspiracy or not). Regardless, I was trying to give a quick view at the controversy over the dictabelt, and that it's not simply "yeah, it's valid".

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more