But how does that apply to the 1,000,000,000,000 Approx cells in the human body. What i mean is that this informative video is great if dealing with a singular cell that then replicates. But multi cellular beings (eg humans), unless the change has been somehow included in the dna carried by the sperm or egg it wont be passed on.
It's no wonder people maintain and, worse yet, disseminate superstitious beliefs: it takes much persistence to start to grasp concepts like RNA, DNA, nucleotides, transcription, replication etc. For many, it's just too hard. Because we humans need to have attachments to mental models of how our 'world' works, many opt for simpler models (religious ones, nontheist spiritual ones, quasi-mechanistic ones.) I think this is the most obvious difference between the warring parties.
This is crab are u telling me a cell from the big band made all this? Neurons ,DNA ,RNA SR RNA ??? Now scientist cannot real explain all this ,expecting a cell creating them? Neurons able to communicate and store information, our body machine able to copy DNA to RNA and the machine does not take rest or have eyes to see where are the DNA that they had to read:)
They think with time a non-living thing can start to live, a non aware being can start to aware,Information (like DNA) can be formed without intellegence,
social behaviour and techniques of animals and insects are in the genes ! an the best is this stuff : /watch?v=dOyc98tV5kA did? evolved wings ! and the ability to fly !
throug random mutations and naturel selection, needless to speak about the evolution of plantes ...
lordplenty, It so happens that American children who come out of religious based educational institutions do much better on standardized achievement tests than do children from the public schools dominated by liberal curriculum and dogma including evolution.Therefore I think the correlation goes the other way.SAY TOU-CHE!
No need for that. There are no "evolutionists" in the first place, as there are no "gravitationists". Also, most theists do accept evolution (and gravity, germ theory etc.). The only proper division is creationists vs rest of the world. Creationism is a growing problem in the US, but so is poor education. Can you see the correlation?
You have not said where genes come from, you just repeat their chemical makeup. o where does the ability to reproduce (copy) their genes? Where does the chemical and physical laws that allow elements to form proteins come from? Everything has a designer and thus a creator.
The chemical law is affinity, the physical law is electromagnetism which together allow elements to form molecules, then into compounds and larger structures, which again via chemical affinity are ability to bind complimentary with amino acids and when thats carried out in sequence and close proximity to another, the amino acids form peptide bonds to create protein strands
These laws come from force carrier particles that spawned along with the matter and anti-matter
Ah, so you must believe in an infinite amount of creators.
You can't say everything requires a creator, but God itself does not as if he exists outside the realm of needing a creator. That's totally retarded. But if you want to go there, then I can just as easily say the primordial atom (big bang) also existed outside the realm of needing creation because it DID in fact exist in a 0 point dimension with out spacetime
@confettibrains What then exists that did not have a creator? Your remark of 0 point dimension is purely dreaming. Theories that will never be proved one way or the other until Christ returns, then it is proven False! lol
You cannot with ANY logic make the fallacious claim that something requires a creator (universe) but another thing (supernatural entity) does not. If you say God requires no creator, you must balance the equation and say the universe also did not require a creator.
"Your remark of 0 point dimension is purely dreaming"
It's true, singularities have 0 dimensions. That's what a point is
@confettibrains Men think of God in worldly senses. However, this creator God is not of this world and is not bound by it laws. His powers and intelligence are so far above what man can understand but, man thinks himself equal or above HIm. Science can understand How God's creation works and then they try to duplicate it in the lab and are successful in many ways. To prove there is no God, start with a vacuum and create one little element, or pixie dust that makes one fly....
"However, this creator God is not of this world and is not bound by it laws"
Fallacy. The universe, originally having no dimension nor spacetime (if the standard model is correct and not M theory), would exist outside of "worldly" laws. And indeed we see proof that the laws of physics were different at the start of this universe. The 3 forces were once one single force, the speed of light was different, and the gravitational constant was much greater.
Yes, this is shown in the bible and practically every other religion/mythical culture by the fact they all depict deities/Gods as humanoid. The bible itself unequivocally says man (adam) was made to LOOK like God. "man b'Tzellem Elohim" in the bible's original hebrew language unambiguously states "in the appearance of Elohim" (elohim = god).
Since the first humans were black-skinned, this means God looks like a black man.
"To prove there is no God, start with a vacuum and create one little element, or pixie dust that makes one fly...."
Or simply prove that particles of energy, or strings of energy, or other universes and dimensions exist outside of our own would disprove God. We could also disprove God by proving how our universe was created. And indeed there are many sound mathematical models that offer complete explanations, and none indicate a need for a supernatural being
@confettibrains You cannot prove how the universe was created because no man was there and all people have ideas, theories, that will never be proven. I do like a theory I read about one time and that all elements started from one, and decayed into all other elements. Since the nuclear age, new elements have been found to fill in the the periodic table. Now that is believable but then again, what power started the reactor and who designed how the decay would go? There is where God is...
"You cannot prove how the universe was created because no man was there and all people have ideas"
Well, what we can prove is that it started as an explosion of highly energetic (very hot) energy, consisting only of quarks which congealed into matter and anti-matter, both then annihilating each other and only a fraction of a percent of all that energy remaining as normal matter due to a slight imbalance during the matter/antimatter formation.
"both then annihilating each other and only a fraction of a percent of all that energy remaining as normal matter due to a slight imbalance during the matter/antimatter formation"
The universe we see today, all the stars, the billions of galaxies, are less than 1% of what once existed.
If only matter was generated in the big bang, our universe would be more bright than it is dark.
"I do like a theory I read about one time and that all elements started from one, and decayed into all other elements"
Yes, all elements started as hydrogen, they did not decay though into heavier elements, they combined in the cores of massive stars by nuclear shell fusion, then were distributed through the cosmos in nova and supernova explosions. Our solar system formed in the remnants of these giant gas clouds.
"He did and the laws for fusion/fissions and everything else you can think of."
Ok, so do you acknowledge that the elements we are made of, the ground we stand on, the sun we bathe under, is a result of nuclear fusion and simple gravitational attraction some 5-7 billion years ago?
@confettibrains Models are made by men entering data to fit within a program, again designed by men, to give out data. How credible is this data, it depends on the information entered, and who entered it and what they are trying to prove. A spectra gamma ray tool differentiates between isotopes injected in oil wells and an engineer said that they could write a program to show what ever they wanted to and weather models are far from accurate 100% of the time.
If there is a God, one as religion describes him, then our reality is a computer program.
Personally I don't like the idea of an arrogant entity pushing buttons as if all life are insignificant characters in a Sim's video game. I will never understand how that comforts some people.
@confettibrains Did the computer have a designer and creator, or did it just grow out of a pile of electrical trash? I have children and in raising them, we had rules for them to follow as all families and societies have in order to keep people in line. Break the rules, you get punished in some way. God is not arrogant, He is just. He set forth rules for men to follow and they did and could not follow them. God made several ways for His people to repent by sacrificing cont.
@pbodymathis something of value to them like their most prized animal to pay for not following God's laws. God also used fire and brim stone, water, and the sword to punish people who did not follow. Death to man is the ultimate but, in fact it is just the beginning. Out of all the time in the universes history, man's life span is not even a dot on that line. To you and other non believers, this is all you get. To Christ followers, it is the next life we look forward to. God gave us life
"God also used fire and brim stone, water, and the sword to punish people who did not follow"
Yep, the description of God in the old testament (with moses) was EXACTLY that of a volcano. (tsunami, cloud plume, lightning strikes, flaming pilar of light ontop of a mountain, ect) Do you think God is a volcano?
"Did the computer have a designer and creator, or did it just grow out of a pile of electrical trash?"
Our computers, or God's computer? Our computer of course did not, nor can this be analogous to life since computers cannot replicate with a slight margin of error like DNA can
@confettibrains But what made the "code" that DNA carries to tell what the organism will be and when to start differentiating and making different organ systems?
@confettibrains Why can't it? Mathematically speaking, it is more probable for a tornado to ripe through a junk yard and leave behind a fully functional 747 than for life to evolve from nothing here on earth. All things are designed and then created. Computers, cars, houses, and all living things. Most species found here on earth are in the fossil records. Why did they not change according to the theories of evolution?
@confettibrains Do you believe everything man puts on the web? I learned in college that an educated person never believes everything he sees, reads, or hears. He should research and get as many facts as possible to make an intelligent decision based on those facts and, if the facts change, he should also be willing to change his previous decision. Most of science is theories, neither proved right or wrong but forced as fact! Jesus is returning, and that is not a theory!
"Most of science is theories, neither proved right or wrong but forced as fact"
A theory exists when it is not proven wrong, nor has any substantiated claim against it, and if it offers the most logical explanation for something
They're never forced as fact. EVERY scientist simply acknowledges them to be the most likely explanation at the moment. If intelligent design had the same empirical data and mathematical proof as evolution has, it would then be acceptable
@confettibrains Did you pay for that? lol Reading the exerts from his book, I can see where he is mixed up. If you look at the Roman Catholic church over the centuries, it has and always will be a church of power. Look at other Christian churches on TV and you may see the same. Jesus came to save us. In doing so, he provided a way for all believers to have counsel with God through Him, that is why we pray in His name. Man is corrupt, the Jewish leaders, the pope, and all others are ..
@pbodymathis cont. 2 subject to falling into sin. Pride, greed, what ever sin you want to name, man does them all in order to achieve something in this world.
Jesus said that He was the way, the truth, and the life. The way to God through Him, the truth in all matters, and eternal life. If you do not want to believe, that is fine but this Jesus will always love you and all others who hate and and curse His name.
"Pride, greed, what ever sin you want to name, man does them all in order to achieve something in this world"
This supports the idea that God looks like a human male and has a personality like one, because God also expresses extreme pride and prejudice. He's also a total bigot.
If you think God is benevolent, you clearly do not understand your religion. You are worshipping nothing but a malevolent supernatural entity. How primitive!
@confettibrains All men have a chance to meet God, just look around, His signature is everywhere. But now they are dead, they have met him or at least understand that He exist. These species cannot be proven to be as modern man, with the ability of free will. Apes have no soul as well as all other animals. Only humans.
@pbodymathis First: Prove there is a soul. Then: Prove humans are the only ones with souls. Then: prove there is a god. ( And don't be an idiot and claim the signs are everywhere without presenting examples. Keep in mind those examples can't have any explanations except for god.) Then, prove its the Christian god (or whatever denomination you are). You have your work cut out for you. If you can't answer these things, shut up.
@anarki1211 To prove God is real? Easy, just go to a quiet place by yourself and humble yourself on your knees and be quiet. Softly speak to Him by first telling him that you do not believe in Him but would like to know if what this idiot on YT is saying about Him is true. You have to be very sincere cause God knows your motives and your heart! Another thing, God cannot listen to sinful men so admit to God all of your sins and He knows everything you have ever done or thought. Cont..
@pbodymathis cont 2... Ask God to come into your heart and change you so that you can see Him. If you are sincere, honest, and humble when you say these little prayers to God, He will listen. When will He reveal Himself to you? I cannot say. It could be that instant, that day, within a week, a month, or a year. It all depends on your sincerity in getting to know Him. Remember, He knows your motives and knows your heart. Do this everyday as long as it takes. How will God reveal Himself?
@pbodymathis cont.3.. I cannot say. It could be in a spirit that you sense or in a dream. It could be in meeting people. God's love for you is very patient, forgiving, and very slow to anger. If you are SINCERE about knowing that there is a God, then do this everyday. Oh and one other thing, do this in Jesus Christ's name. He is the one who bore your sins on a cross and paid with HIs life for you to have the chance for God to hear your prayers. I pray to God that you do this.
@pbodymathis Okay, that falls under the category of having other explanations besides god. If you think about listening to god, you will hear a voice that your mind makes up. If you think you're going to sit and listen to god, then your mind will trick you. Its like when you think about itching, you start to itch. Also, why do the 2000+ religions claim the same thing? Does he talk to everybody? Even the suicide bombers? And why doesn't god tell everybody to be christian? So many logic errors...
@pbodymathis Remember, the bible says that if you don't worship jesus, you will not have infinite life. Why does god not save people from other faiths?
its a shame science is too complicated for the average person to understand, thats why creationists exist, because they don't understand. there are however a few deluded creationist scientists who are being silly
insert a random gene huh? why dont they go make a gene from scratch from elements in nature..dummys refuse to recognize that a creator exists, Allah/elohim/God is who originates creation..period
@tazprince It will not be long before we create life from scratch, there are several chemists and biologists who are trying, and they have already managed to create certain kinds of self-replicating molecules. This is the first step. Everything religion has claimed impossible science has managed to show, religion on the other hand gives us a prophet that rapes 8 year old children.
@astroboomboy we already have. kind of.we created the dna of a bactiera that causes uti put it in a diffrent bacterias nucleas and it became the first type of bacteria
I suppose I just cant stand stupidity. It triggers something inside of me that makes me need to say something about it. Even though I know that some forms of stupidity are self-inflicted and cannot be cured.
Either way, the commenters nickname is not the most disturbing thing about him. Its the comment.
How can one demonstrate such stupidity and such arrogance in the same short sentence? Blows my mind...
@Koekjedrbij1 If you spent your time responding to every idiot, you would quickly run out of time to live. Why pick on this one in particular, you will not win a battle against stupid. You couldn't even physically beat some sense into certain stupid people. It is helpless. If you give a man reason, hell think for a lifetime. If you give a man religion, he'll never have any reason. This man has religion, therefore combating his statements is a pure waste of time...and then theres his username.
This world needs more people like you, sir. Perhaps, when your research schedule allows, you can produce work that the curious-but-lay mind can wrap itself around; that would be of great value to our scientifically ignorant society!
in india ,tamilnadu ,human souls are taken under earth ,under rocks ,even to several thousnds kilometers under rocks under old revenges ,vengenes ,conspirancies ,polatics and given different shapes .in sevrages and made like aliens .please save ..taking under earth and beating and burning .please save .to every one .every molecules .and request to bring all the souls ,creatures from under earth to on earth .please save from pains sufferings .please save
@drshamast There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals), peer reviewed(in main stream scientific journals) scientific papers on evolution, in the past 150 years. Yet you say you can disprove the theorum. Please post the published (main stream scientific journal), peer reviewed (main stream scientific journal) paper that does.
@wizard970 "There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals " most of Biologists in the world did not agree with Weak hypothesis of evolution untile 1940,s with the popitical sift main stream scientific journals changes it doesn't mater what main stream think the trueth is..Assumptions and imagination do not make weak hypothesis of evolution true
@ClaudeWard96 Oh yeah, cause everyone who watches his vids just happens to understand natural selection. Oh, wait, no they don't. Considering he is trying educate people who don't know, shortening it becomes illogical. Considering the point is to teach someone a complete understanding.
@PaperSoapy Well i would of thought that people should know what natural selection is, if they don't then im sure this video would be far to compehensive for a person who does not understand natural selection my freind. By shortening it, it does not become illogical, in my understanding it would make it even easier to understand and if not shorten, he could of atleast stated the fact that it is natural selection.
a web spindle gene taking from a common spider implant it into a living organism maybe a gamete fertilisation occurs mother nature sorts out the rest and there you go genetically making spiderman
? "fortuitous mutation"... as akin to a plastic glass; oxymoronic, at best. This is just another hyped-up, disinforming, albeit aesthetically alluring video.
invented by Jacob Davis, Calvin Rogers and Levi Strauss in 1873, originally designed for work, became popular among teenagers starting in the 1950s. Historic brands include Levi's, Lee and Wrangler in fits, including skinny, tapered, straight, boot cut, or flare
@SwordofSpirit1 Evolution explains why we have the genes for a fully functional tail, chicken have genes for teeth, ostriges have wings and so on. But it mostly explains the diversity of life.
Evolution does not answer any question about the universe, only about biology.
Evolution has passed the scientific method test and therefore is science, if you like it or not. Now stop trolling.
@ivanlagrossemoule I wasn't 'trolling.' That was my honest opinion. Had I realized you angry athiests had your own debased lingo and kept the conversational low, I wouldn't have offered it to begin with. It was to open a debate, but all I get from this site are angry reprobates. KEEP YOU GARBAGE COMMUNITY!
@SwordofSpirit1 Angry? Then I can agree to talk to you in a proper manner. I'll just tell you why some of us easily get angry. The first times I saw people who had a similar opinion to you I tried to talk to them in a very calm and nice way. At first it goes OK. Then you realize most of them ignore your answers and just bring up the same arguments that were given a few comments ago and refuted. After some time you understand that lots of them are trolls.
This sounds like a cake recipe: all started from random events taking place in a loong (undetermined)period of time with a little flavor of chance. Is this lab science?
you know its almost as if i inherited the thoughts of my common ancestors becuase i almost remember swinging on trees and being in this monkey kingdom and i actually undertood the others communiction
@48acar19 You want to hear facts? I advise you to find a book on Amazon.com called "Confessions of a Rocket Scientist" written by Dr. Stanley Swinney, he is one of the rocket scientists who helped put man on the moon. He was one of the main contributers to the apollo missions, and he is a very credible resource. His book talks about How physics corresponds directly with the bible in MANY aspects. Don't dis it till you read it, I know it's kind of an athiest tendency to decide before research.
Even good scientists have sometimes a crappy thinking,
For example Newton used to have two cats. He was bothered about the fact that he needed to interrupt his work many times a day, to allow the cats to go outside or come back. So he made two holes in his door: a large one for the big cat and a small one for the small cat.
@48acar19 Just read the book. All the way through. It's probably like 10-15 years old, but much of the subject matter is still relevant to today. He talk about a lot of the parallels between the bible and modern physics. And as for the cats... that is a bit creepy, lol. But anyway you should REALLY check it out. You probably don't realize how dead set some scientists are on ignoring things that suggest a creator or a "young" universe. They simply ignore it. Not how science it meant to done.
@RHCP723 "You probably don't realize how dead set some scientists are on ignoring things that suggest a creator or a "young" universe. They simply ignore it. Not how science it meant to done."
It is how science is meant to be.
If you really understood what the scientific method is, you would not be making this comment. ANY suggestion of a god or supernatural entity is not, by definition, science. Science deals with the natural world, not the supernatural.
@48acar19 You're a fucking moron. I tried to be civil, but that's not an common trait among ignorant athiests. Knew nothing? The author was one of the scientists that helped put man on the moon... I'd say he's probably a little bit smarter than you. But of course, being that you're completely ignorant like everyone else in your belief system, you will probably never even think about reading any book that I suggest. I think you're just scared to see that you're wrong. Your turn. Excuse?
@48acar19 I'm not a little kid. Don't you think it's a little bit childish on your part to change the subject to a spelling error when you don't have a suitable argument? LMFAO! What's this, did you really use the incorrect form of there/their/they're while correcting my english? That's classic! You should do yourself a favor and just shut the fuck up, lolol!
@48acar19 BULLSHIT ASSUMPTIONS..with ZERO testable chemistry to back it. DNA forming by chance in some mud puddle or deep sea vent .....even under amazing conditions in labs in test tubes nothing forms..worse is getting around the problem of chirality to assemble anything!!..WHAT BULLSHIT!!!..there is ZERO chance of some primitive cell forming!!!!
@48acar19 You answer nothing you moron..and you have no idea what Homochirality is!!!..evolution will not survive in this information code age we are in..molecular machines and RNA forming is impossible
Incidentaly I am vey familiar with chirality, because I work in that field.
You should never accuse somebody before knowing something about it
I know that usually the so-called creationists are choosing a very particular and very secondary aspect of something and they are stressing to death how crucial it is for their so-called theory.
I have underlined the basic flaw (not a trifle!) in your statements: your premise is flawed if you think that evolution occurs at random!
Incidentaly I am vey familiar with chirality, because I work in that field.
You should never accuse somebody before knowing something about it
I know that usually the so-called creationists are choosing a very particular and very secondary aspect of something and they are stressing to death how crucial it is for their so-called theory.
I have underlined the basic flaw (not a trifle!) in your statements: you think that evolution occurs randomly!
@48acar19 You dont work in in this field your full of shit. your not a biochemist..next you will tell me you have a PhD..and you know more than Dean Kenyon.that worked for NASA..he believes in intelligence
@48acar19 All amino acids in proteins are ‘left-handed’, while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are ‘right-handed’.
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture. Which is toxic to life!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do is copy information,thats not creating anything!!..moron atheists !!.your full of shit
I know exactly these details since I also took post-graduate molecular biology courses at Berkeley.
Whatever you don't seem to understand is the fact that these are just details, and that the nature is far more inteligent than you. You think some things are impossible, but the practical experience says different things!
Why don't you read any any issue of "Science"? You might find a cure for your "creationst" illness!
@Apologist315 "nature can not select for a single gene in a single cell, that's impossible"
This is not true, and in fact this is exactly how natural selection works. Furthermore, it is well documented that different genes have differential rates of mutation and evolution and that this mutation and evolution rate for specific genes is consistent across species at the homologous locus.. Again, why do you think this?
"Duplication mutations don't duplicate genes, they duplicate nucleotides."
Not true. Nucleotides would actually be the least likely duplication event. Entire genes and chromosomal regions can be duplicated and this has been observed many times.
"Natural selection works on the phenotype level, not genotype."
Not true. NS MUST act on the genotypic level because you cannot alter phenotype in a heritable way. Otherwise you're arguing against Lamarck.
@Apologist315 Both of your comments are untrue. Where did you get these ideas from? This is completely wrong. I mean this seriously, I'm not trying to be insulting. But with my scientific background, I know that everything your saying is untrue. So my question is, why do you believe this? Did you read this somewhere and misinterpret what you read? Or did you just make this up? Or did you read it somewhere where somebody else had made it up? It's really stunning.
@FreeeeS Because that's what dominated? For whatever reason, luck or what have you, four bases and the 20 amino acids that DNA consists of won out in the end. If our reproductive structure used something else, 6 bases or a different set of amino acids, you'd be asking "Why exactly 6 bases, and why *new DNA-equivalent*? questions questions! :P"
If you can understand this clip, then please add your own beliefs to it and come up with a common ground. Some truth has been told but you have to fill in the blanks.
Discovered in 2003: The underlying law of nature. . Discovered in 2008: The empirical process by which one may identify the underlying law of nature first hand, for oneself. . This knowledge comes with no middleman wearing a fancy hat, cape, scarf, ring or necklace to obey and pay. . Think about it. . The underlying law of nature is the observable, constant, most fundamental way of all things -- all matter, energy, forms, forces, thoughts, behaviour, events and conditions. . Google it.
jeez! thanks for this video i finally have an assignment... ei! 1BS1 Psych... i already got this video so better look for another one!! thanks so much! ^_^
Who decides if a mutation is good or bad for the organism? Who is the supervisor of the DNA? This is the funny part, that evolutionist do not understand that we have no idea what happens in our DNA. To decide if a mutation is good or bad, it means that our DNA has a testing system and has the capacity of making comparisions and of critical analysis.
@AndradaDava Natural process, those with genes that allow better chance of survival is able to pass on those genes. There's no deciding "good" or "bad" gene.
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz - this is what you think, that there is no "deciding good or bad genes". In the reality, the chance for a "good" mutation to happen is mathematical impossible, but in the reality it happens. This means, that our DNA has the capacity to pick up from billions of billions of billions the ONLY possbile solution. Like a computer does. A computer has the capacity of analyzing very fast billions of data and to choose the right one. Our DNA has the same capacity.
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz I did understand your explanation. I just told you that the chance for a mutation to happen is very small, almost impossible, and the simple fact that it happens even tough the odds are so small, means that our DNA has the capacity of producing from bilions of billions of mutations, the one which can give a good solution. This is very similar to the way a computer work.
bless Allah the best of creators
ladoyah 4 days ago
that was just not good enough for me to understand......don't confused with variation of
spices and evolution...... do you really think that we were once just bactarial???
how come i ve ever seen a monkey talking ???? Evolution happened in the past...
why not now?? DNA is made out of gods sound energy(word,code,amino acid)
look at everything god made? think about Faboccino?
it is all in mathmetical order....god is highly intelligent and made us.........
it didn't take...trillons of year
ghostbison 2 weeks ago
@ghostbison it's too complicated to be created by a single thing like a god....
victoriscool1 1 week ago
But how does that apply to the 1,000,000,000,000 Approx cells in the human body. What i mean is that this informative video is great if dealing with a singular cell that then replicates. But multi cellular beings (eg humans), unless the change has been somehow included in the dna carried by the sperm or egg it wont be passed on.
madmanorgenius2011 3 weeks ago
m not getting it :/ :/ gene ?? :o
ayesha749 3 weeks ago
It's no wonder people maintain and, worse yet, disseminate superstitious beliefs: it takes much persistence to start to grasp concepts like RNA, DNA, nucleotides, transcription, replication etc. For many, it's just too hard. Because we humans need to have attachments to mental models of how our 'world' works, many opt for simpler models (religious ones, nontheist spiritual ones, quasi-mechanistic ones.) I think this is the most obvious difference between the warring parties.
rawdonwaller 3 weeks ago
This is crab are u telling me a cell from the big band made all this? Neurons ,DNA ,RNA SR RNA ??? Now scientist cannot real explain all this ,expecting a cell creating them? Neurons able to communicate and store information, our body machine able to copy DNA to RNA and the machine does not take rest or have eyes to see where are the DNA that they had to read:)
tungchunho 1 month ago
Good video.
vernonaicht 1 month ago
Wow, I had no idea. That's absolutely freaking amazing. Random DNA stretches evolve to form novel adaptations. Incredible. :D
kurzweilfreak 1 month ago
Phew, that's awfully complicated, I'll have to watch that again.
XXYSexChromosomes 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They think with time a non-living thing can start to live, a non aware being can start to aware,Information (like DNA) can be formed without intellegence,
social behaviour and techniques of animals and insects are in the genes ! an the best is this stuff : /watch?v=dOyc98tV5kA did? evolved wings ! and the ability to fly !
throug random mutations and naturel selection, needless to speak about the evolution of plantes ...
YamiYami17 1 month ago
Arguing with religious people? Don´t. It is like throw diamonds to the pigs.
I´ve been doing it for nearly 2 years and saw no progress because of their narrow mindedness. I tried doing it for the sake of humanity.
My advise, just leave them alone to rot in their own ignorance.
AllNamesWereOccupied 1 month ago
@AllNamesWereOccupied the problem is their children they will become shitpeople cause of them
ComAntNeLib 1 month ago
lordplenty, It so happens that American children who come out of religious based educational institutions do much better on standardized achievement tests than do children from the public schools dominated by liberal curriculum and dogma including evolution.Therefore I think the correlation goes the other way.SAY TOU-CHE!
Wanda7771 2 months ago
BEWARE OF EVOLUTIONISTS "VOTEBOTS" ON CREATIONIST WEBSITES.THAT'S WHAT YOU DO. STOP PROJECTING
Wanda7771 2 months ago
@Wanda7771
No need for that. There are no "evolutionists" in the first place, as there are no "gravitationists". Also, most theists do accept evolution (and gravity, germ theory etc.). The only proper division is creationists vs rest of the world. Creationism is a growing problem in the US, but so is poor education. Can you see the correlation?
lordplenty 2 months ago
You have not said where genes come from, you just repeat their chemical makeup. o where does the ability to reproduce (copy) their genes? Where does the chemical and physical laws that allow elements to form proteins come from? Everything has a designer and thus a creator.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis - Your right. FSM, of course! (R)amen brah!
RosyBibliophile 2 months ago in playlist More videos from cdk007
@pbodymathis
The chemical law is affinity, the physical law is electromagnetism which together allow elements to form molecules, then into compounds and larger structures, which again via chemical affinity are ability to bind complimentary with amino acids and when thats carried out in sequence and close proximity to another, the amino acids form peptide bonds to create protein strands
These laws come from force carrier particles that spawned along with the matter and anti-matter
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"Everything has a designer and thus a creator"
Ah, so you must believe in an infinite amount of creators.
You can't say everything requires a creator, but God itself does not as if he exists outside the realm of needing a creator. That's totally retarded. But if you want to go there, then I can just as easily say the primordial atom (big bang) also existed outside the realm of needing creation because it DID in fact exist in a 0 point dimension with out spacetime
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains What then exists that did not have a creator? Your remark of 0 point dimension is purely dreaming. Theories that will never be proved one way or the other until Christ returns, then it is proven False! lol
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"What then exists that did not have a creator?"
How about you ask yourself that.
You cannot with ANY logic make the fallacious claim that something requires a creator (universe) but another thing (supernatural entity) does not. If you say God requires no creator, you must balance the equation and say the universe also did not require a creator.
"Your remark of 0 point dimension is purely dreaming"
It's true, singularities have 0 dimensions. That's what a point is
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains Men think of God in worldly senses. However, this creator God is not of this world and is not bound by it laws. His powers and intelligence are so far above what man can understand but, man thinks himself equal or above HIm. Science can understand How God's creation works and then they try to duplicate it in the lab and are successful in many ways. To prove there is no God, start with a vacuum and create one little element, or pixie dust that makes one fly....
pbodymathis 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pbodymathis
"However, this creator God is not of this world and is not bound by it laws"
Fallacy. The universe, originally having no dimension nor spacetime (if the standard model is correct and not M theory), would exist outside of "worldly" laws. And indeed we see proof that the laws of physics were different at the start of this universe. The 3 forces were once one single force, the speed of light was different, and the gravitational constant was much greater.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"man thinks himself equal or above HIm"
Yes, this is shown in the bible and practically every other religion/mythical culture by the fact they all depict deities/Gods as humanoid. The bible itself unequivocally says man (adam) was made to LOOK like God. "man b'Tzellem Elohim" in the bible's original hebrew language unambiguously states "in the appearance of Elohim" (elohim = god).
Since the first humans were black-skinned, this means God looks like a black man.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"To prove there is no God, start with a vacuum and create one little element, or pixie dust that makes one fly...."
Or simply prove that particles of energy, or strings of energy, or other universes and dimensions exist outside of our own would disprove God. We could also disprove God by proving how our universe was created. And indeed there are many sound mathematical models that offer complete explanations, and none indicate a need for a supernatural being
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains You cannot prove how the universe was created because no man was there and all people have ideas, theories, that will never be proven. I do like a theory I read about one time and that all elements started from one, and decayed into all other elements. Since the nuclear age, new elements have been found to fill in the the periodic table. Now that is believable but then again, what power started the reactor and who designed how the decay would go? There is where God is...
pbodymathis 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pbodymathis
"You cannot prove how the universe was created because no man was there and all people have ideas"
Well, what we can prove is that it started as an explosion of highly energetic (very hot) energy, consisting only of quarks which congealed into matter and anti-matter, both then annihilating each other and only a fraction of a percent of all that energy remaining as normal matter due to a slight imbalance during the matter/antimatter formation.
confettibrains 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@confettibrains
"both then annihilating each other and only a fraction of a percent of all that energy remaining as normal matter due to a slight imbalance during the matter/antimatter formation"
The universe we see today, all the stars, the billions of galaxies, are less than 1% of what once existed.
If only matter was generated in the big bang, our universe would be more bright than it is dark.
Tell me why God would work so inefficiently?
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"I do like a theory I read about one time and that all elements started from one, and decayed into all other elements"
Yes, all elements started as hydrogen, they did not decay though into heavier elements, they combined in the cores of massive stars by nuclear shell fusion, then were distributed through the cosmos in nova and supernova explosions. Our solar system formed in the remnants of these giant gas clouds.
Or do you think God created elements too....?
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains He did and the laws for fusion/fissions and everything else you can think of.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pbodymathis
"He did and the laws for fusion/fissions and everything else you can think of."
Ok, so do you acknowledge that the elements we are made of, the ground we stand on, the sun we bathe under, is a result of nuclear fusion and simple gravitational attraction some 5-7 billion years ago?
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains Models are made by men entering data to fit within a program, again designed by men, to give out data. How credible is this data, it depends on the information entered, and who entered it and what they are trying to prove. A spectra gamma ray tool differentiates between isotopes injected in oil wells and an engineer said that they could write a program to show what ever they wanted to and weather models are far from accurate 100% of the time.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
If there is a God, one as religion describes him, then our reality is a computer program.
Personally I don't like the idea of an arrogant entity pushing buttons as if all life are insignificant characters in a Sim's video game. I will never understand how that comforts some people.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains Did the computer have a designer and creator, or did it just grow out of a pile of electrical trash? I have children and in raising them, we had rules for them to follow as all families and societies have in order to keep people in line. Break the rules, you get punished in some way. God is not arrogant, He is just. He set forth rules for men to follow and they did and could not follow them. God made several ways for His people to repent by sacrificing cont.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis something of value to them like their most prized animal to pay for not following God's laws. God also used fire and brim stone, water, and the sword to punish people who did not follow. Death to man is the ultimate but, in fact it is just the beginning. Out of all the time in the universes history, man's life span is not even a dot on that line. To you and other non believers, this is all you get. To Christ followers, it is the next life we look forward to. God gave us life
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis cont 3 and only God can take it from us. Some times man dies, and comes back to life. You Tube, near death accounts. Look into them.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"God also used fire and brim stone, water, and the sword to punish people who did not follow"
Yep, the description of God in the old testament (with moses) was EXACTLY that of a volcano. (tsunami, cloud plume, lightning strikes, flaming pilar of light ontop of a mountain, ect) Do you think God is a volcano?
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"Did the computer have a designer and creator, or did it just grow out of a pile of electrical trash?"
Our computers, or God's computer? Our computer of course did not, nor can this be analogous to life since computers cannot replicate with a slight margin of error like DNA can
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains But what made the "code" that DNA carries to tell what the organism will be and when to start differentiating and making different organ systems?
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@confettibrains Why can't it? Mathematically speaking, it is more probable for a tornado to ripe through a junk yard and leave behind a fully functional 747 than for life to evolve from nothing here on earth. All things are designed and then created. Computers, cars, houses, and all living things. Most species found here on earth are in the fossil records. Why did they not change according to the theories of evolution?
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@confettibrains soon we will make computer design our computers and then they will evolve
circle601 4 weeks ago
@pbodymathis
"Your remark of 0 point dimension is purely dreaming"
Black holes, which are quantifiable objects in our universe, exist as a 0 point dimension.
You thinking zombie Christ is coming, or the fact you think Jesus even existed (vvv,jesusneverexisted,com) is the only dream state here.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains Do you believe everything man puts on the web? I learned in college that an educated person never believes everything he sees, reads, or hears. He should research and get as many facts as possible to make an intelligent decision based on those facts and, if the facts change, he should also be willing to change his previous decision. Most of science is theories, neither proved right or wrong but forced as fact! Jesus is returning, and that is not a theory!
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"Most of science is theories, neither proved right or wrong but forced as fact"
A theory exists when it is not proven wrong, nor has any substantiated claim against it, and if it offers the most logical explanation for something
They're never forced as fact. EVERY scientist simply acknowledges them to be the most likely explanation at the moment. If intelligent design had the same empirical data and mathematical proof as evolution has, it would then be acceptable
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains Did you pay for that? lol Reading the exerts from his book, I can see where he is mixed up. If you look at the Roman Catholic church over the centuries, it has and always will be a church of power. Look at other Christian churches on TV and you may see the same. Jesus came to save us. In doing so, he provided a way for all believers to have counsel with God through Him, that is why we pray in His name. Man is corrupt, the Jewish leaders, the pope, and all others are ..
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis cont. 2 subject to falling into sin. Pride, greed, what ever sin you want to name, man does them all in order to achieve something in this world.
Jesus said that He was the way, the truth, and the life. The way to God through Him, the truth in all matters, and eternal life. If you do not want to believe, that is fine but this Jesus will always love you and all others who hate and and curse His name.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pbodymathis
"Pride, greed, what ever sin you want to name, man does them all in order to achieve something in this world"
This supports the idea that God looks like a human male and has a personality like one, because God also expresses extreme pride and prejudice. He's also a total bigot.
If you think God is benevolent, you clearly do not understand your religion. You are worshipping nothing but a malevolent supernatural entity. How primitive!
confettibrains 2 months ago
@pbodymathis
"The way to God through Him, the truth in all matters, and eternal life"
I guess all the homo sapiens for the past 150k years never got to meet God, then.
Nor the dozen other humanoid species who also had sentience and moderate intelligence for the last 4 million years
confettibrains 2 months ago
@confettibrains All men have a chance to meet God, just look around, His signature is everywhere. But now they are dead, they have met him or at least understand that He exist. These species cannot be proven to be as modern man, with the ability of free will. Apes have no soul as well as all other animals. Only humans.
pbodymathis 2 months ago
@pbodymathis First: Prove there is a soul. Then: Prove humans are the only ones with souls. Then: prove there is a god. ( And don't be an idiot and claim the signs are everywhere without presenting examples. Keep in mind those examples can't have any explanations except for god.) Then, prove its the Christian god (or whatever denomination you are). You have your work cut out for you. If you can't answer these things, shut up.
anarki1211 1 month ago
@anarki1211 To prove God is real? Easy, just go to a quiet place by yourself and humble yourself on your knees and be quiet. Softly speak to Him by first telling him that you do not believe in Him but would like to know if what this idiot on YT is saying about Him is true. You have to be very sincere cause God knows your motives and your heart! Another thing, God cannot listen to sinful men so admit to God all of your sins and He knows everything you have ever done or thought. Cont..
pbodymathis 1 month ago
@pbodymathis cont 2... Ask God to come into your heart and change you so that you can see Him. If you are sincere, honest, and humble when you say these little prayers to God, He will listen. When will He reveal Himself to you? I cannot say. It could be that instant, that day, within a week, a month, or a year. It all depends on your sincerity in getting to know Him. Remember, He knows your motives and knows your heart. Do this everyday as long as it takes. How will God reveal Himself?
pbodymathis 1 month ago
@pbodymathis Why do I have to jump through hoops to know him? Is he lazy? Why do I have to make an effort to hear him?
anarki1211 1 month ago
@pbodymathis Last, why do my motives matter? Can't god speak to me regardless of my motives?
anarki1211 1 month ago
@pbodymathis cont.3.. I cannot say. It could be in a spirit that you sense or in a dream. It could be in meeting people. God's love for you is very patient, forgiving, and very slow to anger. If you are SINCERE about knowing that there is a God, then do this everyday. Oh and one other thing, do this in Jesus Christ's name. He is the one who bore your sins on a cross and paid with HIs life for you to have the chance for God to hear your prayers. I pray to God that you do this.
pbodymathis 1 month ago
@pbodymathis Okay, that falls under the category of having other explanations besides god. If you think about listening to god, you will hear a voice that your mind makes up. If you think you're going to sit and listen to god, then your mind will trick you. Its like when you think about itching, you start to itch. Also, why do the 2000+ religions claim the same thing? Does he talk to everybody? Even the suicide bombers? And why doesn't god tell everybody to be christian? So many logic errors...
anarki1211 1 month ago
@pbodymathis Remember, the bible says that if you don't worship jesus, you will not have infinite life. Why does god not save people from other faiths?
anarki1211 1 month ago
1:10 that happens all the time :D
Oslokiddo 2 months ago
a grape has 30,434 genes
vampirenosferatu 2 months ago
take that creationist fools!
astroboomboy 3 months ago
i know these all things
Arif115531 3 months ago
su my bitches
yomamma2756 3 months ago
a+b gene is not answer to increased number of genes,.somone must have vision of exactly what is doing, genes are only coseqence of somones idea!
krstajic80 3 months ago
@krstajic80 idc
yomamma2756 3 months ago
Great video. Wish I was that smart ^^
10/10 rating
ProdigyBigBoss89 3 months ago
Excellent well done video. Thank you for posting and for keeping us informed.
macmarty2025 3 months ago
its a shame science is too complicated for the average person to understand, thats why creationists exist, because they don't understand. there are however a few deluded creationist scientists who are being silly
RelativelyHostile1 3 months ago
insert a random gene huh? why dont they go make a gene from scratch from elements in nature..dummys refuse to recognize that a creator exists, Allah/elohim/God is who originates creation..period
tazprince 4 months ago
@tazprince It will not be long before we create life from scratch, there are several chemists and biologists who are trying, and they have already managed to create certain kinds of self-replicating molecules. This is the first step. Everything religion has claimed impossible science has managed to show, religion on the other hand gives us a prophet that rapes 8 year old children.
astroboomboy 3 months ago
@astroboomboy we already have. kind of.we created the dna of a bactiera that causes uti put it in a diffrent bacterias nucleas and it became the first type of bacteria
@tazprince
in 5-15 years they will be able to. but why? when you can get a it already made
circle601 3 months ago
@circle601 I don't understand your comment.
astroboomboy 3 months ago
@astroboomboy we can create the dna a of a cell or virus.soon we might be able to create the rest of the cell
circle601 2 months ago
Billions and billions of years. Take all the time you need. I have an intelligent creator.
subd3 4 months ago
No weapon is too small to beat other people up with.
arturobastard 4 months ago
Ty for posting this. Got to say it.
darkbear1strb 6 months ago
the magic of life = GOD, not science...
TupacwuzaGorillaPimp 6 months ago
@TupacwuzaGorillaPimp
People lying to themselves about retarded nonsence like demons and talking snakes, thats a miracle.
Koekjedrbij1 6 months ago
@Koekjedrbij1My friend, Why are you giving your time of day to a commenter named "Tupac was a gorilla pimp."?
jnwpse 5 months ago
@jnwpse
I suppose I just cant stand stupidity. It triggers something inside of me that makes me need to say something about it. Even though I know that some forms of stupidity are self-inflicted and cannot be cured.
Either way, the commenters nickname is not the most disturbing thing about him. Its the comment.
How can one demonstrate such stupidity and such arrogance in the same short sentence? Blows my mind...
Koekjedrbij1 5 months ago
@Koekjedrbij1 If you spent your time responding to every idiot, you would quickly run out of time to live. Why pick on this one in particular, you will not win a battle against stupid. You couldn't even physically beat some sense into certain stupid people. It is helpless. If you give a man reason, hell think for a lifetime. If you give a man religion, he'll never have any reason. This man has religion, therefore combating his statements is a pure waste of time...and then theres his username.
jnwpse 5 months ago
@jnwpse That's true. Feeding trolls is rather unproductive. Feeding dim-witted and/or religiously indoctrinated trolls is particularly unproductive.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
This world needs more people like you, sir. Perhaps, when your research schedule allows, you can produce work that the curious-but-lay mind can wrap itself around; that would be of great value to our scientifically ignorant society!
ssilz 6 months ago
thx for subtitles!
esraretin 6 months ago
in india ,tamilnadu ,human souls are taken under earth ,under rocks ,even to several thousnds kilometers under rocks under old revenges ,vengenes ,conspirancies ,polatics and given different shapes .in sevrages and made like aliens .please save ..taking under earth and beating and burning .please save .to every one .every molecules .and request to bring all the souls ,creatures from under earth to on earth .please save from pains sufferings .please save
bgupta2001 7 months ago
Assumptions and imagination do not make weak hypothesis of evolution true..........
watch?v=4zK81Zti9BM&feature=channel_video_title
drshamast 7 months ago
@drshamast There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals), peer reviewed(in main stream scientific journals) scientific papers on evolution, in the past 150 years. Yet you say you can disprove the theorum. Please post the published (main stream scientific journal), peer reviewed (main stream scientific journal) paper that does.
wizard970 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wizard970 "There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals " most of Biologists in the world did not agree with Weak hypothesis of evolution untile 1940,s with the popitical sift main stream scientific journals changes it doesn't mater what main stream think the trueth is..Assumptions and imagination do not make weak hypothesis of evolution true
watch?v=nnj_OtkUK3I&feature=channel_video_title
drshamast 6 months ago
you could of shortened it by stating that it is natural selection near towards the start. anyway helpfull video. :)
ClaudeWard96 8 months ago
@ClaudeWard96 Oh yeah, cause everyone who watches his vids just happens to understand natural selection. Oh, wait, no they don't. Considering he is trying educate people who don't know, shortening it becomes illogical. Considering the point is to teach someone a complete understanding.
PaperSoapy 8 months ago
@PaperSoapy Well i would of thought that people should know what natural selection is, if they don't then im sure this video would be far to compehensive for a person who does not understand natural selection my freind. By shortening it, it does not become illogical, in my understanding it would make it even easier to understand and if not shorten, he could of atleast stated the fact that it is natural selection.
ClaudeWard96 8 months ago
Or as peanut would say. "zzzzzzZZOOOOMM!!!" *Flings hand over the top of his head*
PaperSoapy 8 months ago
This is a better knowledgeable short video about genes!
watch?v=_zzCjnvEtgo
BirdMoments 8 months ago
Fuck you. I don't know y
Gandalfgrey93 9 months ago
a web spindle gene taking from a common spider implant it into a living organism maybe a gamete fertilisation occurs mother nature sorts out the rest and there you go genetically making spiderman
philslegacy 10 months ago
? "fortuitous mutation"... as akin to a plastic glass; oxymoronic, at best. This is just another hyped-up, disinforming, albeit aesthetically alluring video.
veeveevenn 11 months ago
Well, I bought my jeans at JCPenny.
physiologics1 1 year ago
Wow great video!! Thanks for sharing!!
iversonmatthew 1 year ago
invented by Jacob Davis, Calvin Rogers and Levi Strauss in 1873, originally designed for work, became popular among teenagers starting in the 1950s. Historic brands include Levi's, Lee and Wrangler in fits, including skinny, tapered, straight, boot cut, or flare
slowmopoke 1 year ago
Comment removed
SwordofSpirit1 1 year ago
I was very deep, so deep that I can re-write the study of DNA and genes because there is a lot of error. It will take some time to recover.
heartlessvietboy 1 year ago
@SwordofSpirit1 Evolution explains why we have the genes for a fully functional tail, chicken have genes for teeth, ostriges have wings and so on. But it mostly explains the diversity of life.
Evolution does not answer any question about the universe, only about biology.
Evolution has passed the scientific method test and therefore is science, if you like it or not. Now stop trolling.
ivanlagrossemoule 1 year ago
@ivanlagrossemoule I wasn't 'trolling.' That was my honest opinion. Had I realized you angry athiests had your own debased lingo and kept the conversational low, I wouldn't have offered it to begin with. It was to open a debate, but all I get from this site are angry reprobates. KEEP YOU GARBAGE COMMUNITY!
SwordofSpirit1 1 year ago
@SwordofSpirit1 Angry? Then I can agree to talk to you in a proper manner. I'll just tell you why some of us easily get angry. The first times I saw people who had a similar opinion to you I tried to talk to them in a very calm and nice way. At first it goes OK. Then you realize most of them ignore your answers and just bring up the same arguments that were given a few comments ago and refuted. After some time you understand that lots of them are trolls.
ivanlagrossemoule 1 year ago
This sounds like a cake recipe: all started from random events taking place in a loong (undetermined)period of time with a little flavor of chance. Is this lab science?
ShadowManRO 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you know its almost as if i inherited the thoughts of my common ancestors becuase i almost remember swinging on trees and being in this monkey kingdom and i actually undertood the others communiction
carbonfconfusion 1 year ago
Scientists Rule !!!! Thank you Sir for this great video.
just4comments123 1 year ago
Even inteligent people with one hundred PHD's, might happen to believe in shit.
Not the inteligence decides if something is true or not.
The FACTS decide on that!
And the facts are clear: there is absolutely no alternative to evolution, whatever somebody's belief system is!
Up to this very moment there is no alternative hypothesis (not to speak about theories, which are proven hypothesis!) to evolution!
The rest is Bullshit!
Jesus-crap!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 You want to hear facts? I advise you to find a book on Amazon.com called "Confessions of a Rocket Scientist" written by Dr. Stanley Swinney, he is one of the rocket scientists who helped put man on the moon. He was one of the main contributers to the apollo missions, and he is a very credible resource. His book talks about How physics corresponds directly with the bible in MANY aspects. Don't dis it till you read it, I know it's kind of an athiest tendency to decide before research.
RHCP723 1 year ago
@RHCP723
Even good scientists have sometimes a crappy thinking,
For example Newton used to have two cats. He was bothered about the fact that he needed to interrupt his work many times a day, to allow the cats to go outside or come back. So he made two holes in his door: a large one for the big cat and a small one for the small cat.
Anyway, this is shit here, not science.
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 Just read the book. All the way through. It's probably like 10-15 years old, but much of the subject matter is still relevant to today. He talk about a lot of the parallels between the bible and modern physics. And as for the cats... that is a bit creepy, lol. But anyway you should REALLY check it out. You probably don't realize how dead set some scientists are on ignoring things that suggest a creator or a "young" universe. They simply ignore it. Not how science it meant to done.
RHCP723 1 year ago
@RHCP723
Yes, scientists are right to ignore shit.
When Einstein was a clerk in a Patent Office in Bern, he did not read all the so-called "patents" about the "perpetuum mobile".
His job required him to throw them to the garbage bin.
This is the case with all the "creationist" junk too. It has to be discarded!
48acar19 1 year ago
@RHCP723 "You probably don't realize how dead set some scientists are on ignoring things that suggest a creator or a "young" universe. They simply ignore it. Not how science it meant to done."
It is how science is meant to be.
If you really understood what the scientific method is, you would not be making this comment. ANY suggestion of a god or supernatural entity is not, by definition, science. Science deals with the natural world, not the supernatural.
burkerow 1 year ago
@RHCP723
I reccomend you not to read shit written in a different era by people who knew nothing.
Please read the periodicals "Science", "Scientific American", "new Scientist" and others. Don't read shit!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 You're a fucking moron. I tried to be civil, but that's not an common trait among ignorant athiests. Knew nothing? The author was one of the scientists that helped put man on the moon... I'd say he's probably a little bit smarter than you. But of course, being that you're completely ignorant like everyone else in your belief system, you will probably never even think about reading any book that I suggest. I think you're just scared to see that you're wrong. Your turn. Excuse?
RHCP723 1 year ago
@RHCP723
You are saying: "You're a fucking moron. I tried to be civil, but that's not an common trait among ignorant athiests."
I see!
On the other hand you should go to school; learn some spelling lessons.
The correct spelling is still "Atheist", because it comes from "a" and "theos". That means "without...god". (theos means god in the Ancient Greek).
I suppose you are a little kid and this is why I would reccomend you to go to school. You can learn there civility too.
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 I'm not a little kid. Don't you think it's a little bit childish on your part to change the subject to a spelling error when you don't have a suitable argument? LMFAO! What's this, did you really use the incorrect form of there/their/they're while correcting my english? That's classic! You should do yourself a favor and just shut the fuck up, lolol!
RHCP723 1 year ago
@48acar19 AND you spelled recommend wrong. How embarrassing...
RHCP723 1 year ago
@RHCP723 "I know it's kind of an athiest tendency to decide before research."
Shouldn't you say that about Christians?
burkerow 1 year ago
Erata: Organic c hemist
48acar19 1 year ago
For cell biology I recommend Lodish or Alberts. It's what we use in our med school :)
ashevm 1 year ago
238 negative arrows means 238 stupid creationists, which is in fact a pleonasm. All creationists are stupid!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 BULLSHIT ASSUMPTIONS..with ZERO testable chemistry to back it. DNA forming by chance in some mud puddle or deep sea vent .....even under amazing conditions in labs in test tubes nothing forms..worse is getting around the problem of chirality to assemble anything!!..WHAT BULLSHIT!!!..there is ZERO chance of some primitive cell forming!!!!
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
If you are not irremediably brainwashed, I would advise you to read "Science", the periodical with scientific novelties.
It was a huge surprise when scientists hava managed to obtain a quick process of evolution...in the presence of only some proteins.
Before saying bullshit you need to be informed!
The Jesus-science does not exist!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 RNA must all be right-handed instead of the normal half and half...learn homochirality..There is ZERO chance of RNA forming.
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
You must be highly ignorant if you are saying that things happen randomly!
Why don't you take my advice to consult what scientists have done, in "Science"?
It was an extraordinary find to see that evolution happens, against all odds, extremely quickly under some specific circumstances!
Are you a religionist creationist, Sir?
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 You answer nothing you moron..and you have no idea what Homochirality is!!!..evolution will not survive in this information code age we are in..molecular machines and RNA forming is impossible
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
Incidentaly I am vey familiar with chirality, because I work in that field.
You should never accuse somebody before knowing something about it
I know that usually the so-called creationists are choosing a very particular and very secondary aspect of something and they are stressing to death how crucial it is for their so-called theory.
I have underlined the basic flaw (not a trifle!) in your statements: your premise is flawed if you think that evolution occurs at random!
48acar19 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
@5tonyvvvv
Incidentaly I am vey familiar with chirality, because I work in that field.
You should never accuse somebody before knowing something about it
I know that usually the so-called creationists are choosing a very particular and very secondary aspect of something and they are stressing to death how crucial it is for their so-called theory.
I have underlined the basic flaw (not a trifle!) in your statements: you think that evolution occurs randomly!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 You dont work in in this field your full of shit. your not a biochemist..next you will tell me you have a PhD..and you know more than Dean Kenyon.that worked for NASA..he believes in intelligence
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
Incidentally I am an organic henist and for me chirality is ...job-realted stuff.
But I don't see the meaning of this discussion, as long as your premises are false.
The details don't matter!
Creationism is still the stupidest thing in the world, and your aggresive yelling doesn't change that!
48acar19 1 year ago
@48acar19 All amino acids in proteins are ‘left-handed’, while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are ‘right-handed’.
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture. Which is toxic to life!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do is copy information,thats not creating anything!!..moron atheists !!.your full of shit
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
I know exactly these details since I also took post-graduate molecular biology courses at Berkeley.
Whatever you don't seem to understand is the fact that these are just details, and that the nature is far more inteligent than you. You think some things are impossible, but the practical experience says different things!
Why don't you read any any issue of "Science"? You might find a cure for your "creationst" illness!
48acar19 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
More than that, who told you that things occur randomly?
This is extremely stupid of you to say it!
48acar19 1 year ago
so ... humans are chimps?
vardanology 1 year ago
@vardanology no.
iouakick 1 year ago
@iouakick
chimps are human? lol j/k
vardanology 1 year ago
@vardanology hehe ;D
iouakick 1 year ago
@iouakick
Latest news....Santa filed bankruptcy yesterday. 20,000 Elfs got layoff.
vardanology 1 year ago
I eated a spider. It tickled!
tanton1 1 year ago
@tanton1 hahaahahaha
NikkDriver 1 year ago
@Apologist315 "nature can not select for a single gene in a single cell, that's impossible"
This is not true, and in fact this is exactly how natural selection works. Furthermore, it is well documented that different genes have differential rates of mutation and evolution and that this mutation and evolution rate for specific genes is consistent across species at the homologous locus.. Again, why do you think this?
EpigeneticEngineer 1 year ago
@Apologist315 "Even if a new stretch of DNA formed a functional protein, natural selection wouldn't be able to see it."
Explain why this would be true. It's not, but I'd like to see you try to explain it.
EpigeneticEngineer 1 year ago
@Apologist315 Here's where you're wrong.
"Duplication mutations don't duplicate genes, they duplicate nucleotides."
Not true. Nucleotides would actually be the least likely duplication event. Entire genes and chromosomal regions can be duplicated and this has been observed many times.
"Natural selection works on the phenotype level, not genotype."
Not true. NS MUST act on the genotypic level because you cannot alter phenotype in a heritable way. Otherwise you're arguing against Lamarck.
EpigeneticEngineer 1 year ago
@Apologist315 Both of your comments are untrue. Where did you get these ideas from? This is completely wrong. I mean this seriously, I'm not trying to be insulting. But with my scientific background, I know that everything your saying is untrue. So my question is, why do you believe this? Did you read this somewhere and misinterpret what you read? Or did you just make this up? Or did you read it somewhere where somebody else had made it up? It's really stunning.
EpigeneticEngineer 1 year ago
why exactly 4 bases and why DNA? questions questions! :P
FreeeeS 1 year ago
@FreeeeS Because that's what dominated? For whatever reason, luck or what have you, four bases and the 20 amino acids that DNA consists of won out in the end. If our reproductive structure used something else, 6 bases or a different set of amino acids, you'd be asking "Why exactly 6 bases, and why *new DNA-equivalent*? questions questions! :P"
Anthropic principle, man. Look it up.
ThePhilosophicalDoc 1 year ago
So far 236 creationist-tards have seen this video.
winterstellar 1 year ago
@winterstellar
yup
pufixas 1 year ago
Bacteria FTW! Rapid reproduction > creationists arguments that would regularly take millions of years to disprove!
ToulBoi 1 year ago
man i just LOVE your videos! AWESOME!
kheffah 1 year ago
whats your say on matt ridley's hypothesis about the more advance bacterias?
BioBoosterSoldier 1 year ago
If you can understand this clip, then please add your own beliefs to it and come up with a common ground. Some truth has been told but you have to fill in the blanks.
Escekar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Escekar can someone help? how do i know if i have good genes?
futb0lista7777777 1 year ago
ang lalim mo teng! hindi ko ma-reach. lol
inday811 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Comment removed
stubbornVN 1 year ago
congrats! fantastic video!!
peavy82 1 year ago
jeez! thanks for this video i finally have an assignment... ei! 1BS1 Psych... i already got this video so better look for another one!! thanks so much! ^_^
ERie315 1 year ago
Who decides if a mutation is good or bad for the organism? Who is the supervisor of the DNA? This is the funny part, that evolutionist do not understand that we have no idea what happens in our DNA. To decide if a mutation is good or bad, it means that our DNA has a testing system and has the capacity of making comparisions and of critical analysis.
AndradaDava 1 year ago
@AndradaDava Natural process, those with genes that allow better chance of survival is able to pass on those genes. There's no deciding "good" or "bad" gene.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz - this is what you think, that there is no "deciding good or bad genes". In the reality, the chance for a "good" mutation to happen is mathematical impossible, but in the reality it happens. This means, that our DNA has the capacity to pick up from billions of billions of billions the ONLY possbile solution. Like a computer does. A computer has the capacity of analyzing very fast billions of data and to choose the right one. Our DNA has the same capacity.
AndradaDava 1 year ago
@AndradaDava Omg...you obviously did not understand my explanation, its not "decided" its passed on.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz I did understand your explanation. I just told you that the chance for a mutation to happen is very small, almost impossible, and the simple fact that it happens even tough the odds are so small, means that our DNA has the capacity of producing from bilions of billions of mutations, the one which can give a good solution. This is very similar to the way a computer work.
AndradaDava 1 year ago