Wasn't keen on this one. Casino Royale was way better, it was a really emotional film that portrayed Bond as a vulnerable and rather troubled agent. It showed that Bond is not unstoppable. That he has flaws.
@SuburbianKnights It reveals the point of the organization from the first craig film. They are elites working behind the scenes to control national interests. They influence global politics, national interests and who pursues them, and have a hold on both west/east powers. This organization doesnt really want money, it wants -power-. Water will be more valuable that oil one day. Plot indeed.
if you believe that james bond is supposed to be grateful, suave, sophisticated, you are clearly more ignorant than a typical bond fanboy, i will say this DANIEL CRAIG IS SUPPOSED TO BE PLAYING THE BOND THE WAY HE WAS ORIGINALLY CHARACTERIZED IN IAN FLEMMINGS NOVELS as DARK, IRONIC, COLD, MENACING and DANGEROUS with a DRY SENSE OF HUMOR,
The film was very dissapointing it had little plot,no character development and all the action was terribly edited which made the action impossible to follow
Hmm I feel a little confused about the bad guys intentions, stealing a 3rd world country's water supplies? I just feel like the bond-villains has lowered their standards, no more world domination :(
@ankerman92 yeah especially since it basically compromised on everything that made the Bond movies special and uniqe. I am what you can call a true Bond fan, I have read all the books and seen every movie but I will never call this a good bond movie. Its nothing more than an average action movie.
@heavytom89 actually what promted me to write that comment i have no idea lol i must of been high on something at the time, casino was waaaaaay better, hopefully bond 23 next year will own both previous installments, they announced the actor thats playing the villain today, the guy that was in no country for old men
I think it was disjointed, and had an action-driven plot.
It wasn't bad, but it wasn't good, either, especially after the masterpiece that was Casino Royale. Overall, I think we got our hopes too high for this one.
ok movie definately not as good as casino royale, not that great action, sooooo confusing, i think this wasn't amazing, the only cool gadget was the touch screen thing, in the previous film at least there was the cool car fold out drawer thing and a kind of gadgety feel, want a better action movie see bourne, better bond movie see casino royale, I think at this point in the franchise each new bond should be better than the last
This was a very action-lacking movie, barely any action. They took away what made Bond truly awesome. The gadgets, the suaveness, the guns, the women, and the action. Sure, it has some weaker versions of this, but its not what I expected.
Well, he didn't, so I will take the liberty to! This movie was ALL action. There would be a ten minute action sequence, then a two minute talking scene, then another ten minuter action scene. Bond showed no pain, he seemed to be some kind of super human who could just get the crap knocked out of him, beat the guy up, say oww, then go to the next action scene. There is no development, there is none of the swagger, none of the gadgets, and none of Bond being Bond. Just Daniel Craig beating stuffup
even if you hate this movie, you gotta admit the last 5 minutes between bond and M was a great scene.
goldwaterproductions 10 months ago
Wasn't keen on this one. Casino Royale was way better, it was a really emotional film that portrayed Bond as a vulnerable and rather troubled agent. It showed that Bond is not unstoppable. That he has flaws.
Coruscant98 1 year ago
It's funny to watch old 007's and see all the things that Q thinks is Hi-tech and worth millions, then you realise you bought it for $10.
17thSHIT 1 year ago
THIS FILM HAD NO FREAKIN' PLOT!
SuburbianKnights 1 year ago
@SuburbianKnights It reveals the point of the organization from the first craig film. They are elites working behind the scenes to control national interests. They influence global politics, national interests and who pursues them, and have a hold on both west/east powers. This organization doesnt really want money, it wants -power-. Water will be more valuable that oil one day. Plot indeed.
thepatient08 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK all of you daniel craig haters
if you believe that james bond is supposed to be grateful, suave, sophisticated, you are clearly more ignorant than a typical bond fanboy, i will say this DANIEL CRAIG IS SUPPOSED TO BE PLAYING THE BOND THE WAY HE WAS ORIGINALLY CHARACTERIZED IN IAN FLEMMINGS NOVELS as DARK, IRONIC, COLD, MENACING and DANGEROUS with a DRY SENSE OF HUMOR,
lored96 1 year ago
The film was very dissapointing it had little plot,no character development and all the action was terribly edited which made the action impossible to follow
eddyc09 1 year ago
I know obviously he wouldn't be able to play him be but I wish sean Connery was still bond
ThEhOmiesSWaLrUs 1 year ago
Completely agree, the new films are awful in my opinion.
RockbandDrumist 2 years ago
THE SECOND WROST BOND MOVIE
luis61961944 2 years ago
Hmm I feel a little confused about the bad guys intentions, stealing a 3rd world country's water supplies? I just feel like the bond-villains has lowered their standards, no more world domination :(
hellheimer 2 years ago
good film but a bit too short
capownz 3 years ago 6
IGN movie reviews are pretty crap.
80smusicfanNO1 3 years ago 3
lol it's so damn lame how it's becoming cool to rip this movie because it wasn't as good as casino royale.
haroof 3 years ago
From what I've heard this doesn't compare to Casino Royale, but I'm going to watch it anyway.
spannerman100 3 years ago
im SO getting this on blue-ray when it comes out
WattsBrotherPro 3 years ago
7.5 superb film.
RogueRotting360 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
was a crap film
skateboard4zero 3 years ago
this movie was fuckin awsum, fuck the haters, any true bond fan would have loved the movie like i did, better than casino royale in my opinion
ankerman92 3 years ago 7
@ankerman92 yeah especially since it basically compromised on everything that made the Bond movies special and uniqe. I am what you can call a true Bond fan, I have read all the books and seen every movie but I will never call this a good bond movie. Its nothing more than an average action movie.
heavytom89 4 months ago
@heavytom89 actually what promted me to write that comment i have no idea lol i must of been high on something at the time, casino was waaaaaay better, hopefully bond 23 next year will own both previous installments, they announced the actor thats playing the villain today, the guy that was in no country for old men
ankerman92 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it sucked a huge letdown 5.7/10
erdem559 3 years ago
i think the next Bond movie should have a male sidekick with him.
well there should be a girl too as always but the male is gay and die at the end.
this should me bond movie more interesting.
VividFps 3 years ago
I think it was disjointed, and had an action-driven plot.
It wasn't bad, but it wasn't good, either, especially after the masterpiece that was Casino Royale. Overall, I think we got our hopes too high for this one.
StealthyBug 3 years ago
i agree
guitarboytv 3 years ago
ok movie definately not as good as casino royale, not that great action, sooooo confusing, i think this wasn't amazing, the only cool gadget was the touch screen thing, in the previous film at least there was the cool car fold out drawer thing and a kind of gadgety feel, want a better action movie see bourne, better bond movie see casino royale, I think at this point in the franchise each new bond should be better than the last
oofuu222 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quantum sucked, the sory sucked and the fighting wasn't THAT good. It was only OK.
arbtr333 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude this movie sucks wtf
iGl3n8483 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This was a very action-lacking movie, barely any action. They took away what made Bond truly awesome. The gadgets, the suaveness, the guns, the women, and the action. Sure, it has some weaker versions of this, but its not what I expected.
EnjoiTh3Panda 3 years ago
Dude.
Quantum sucked SO bad.
JacksonHagin 3 years ago
explain.
drumguy2007 3 years ago 2
Well, he didn't, so I will take the liberty to! This movie was ALL action. There would be a ten minute action sequence, then a two minute talking scene, then another ten minuter action scene. Bond showed no pain, he seemed to be some kind of super human who could just get the crap knocked out of him, beat the guy up, say oww, then go to the next action scene. There is no development, there is none of the swagger, none of the gadgets, and none of Bond being Bond. Just Daniel Craig beating stuffup
cheeseleader09 3 years ago
i'll go watch it
rodm07 3 years ago
Meh.
LippyProductions 3 years ago
lol i heard this movie sucked from my friend but this is the exact opposite
nancyboy07 3 years ago
it is a good action film, but a crap bond film. It tries to be like the Bourne series.
eldeano1 3 years ago 3
6th, woot
good movie
flight1991 3 years ago
sweet
Shadow809 3 years ago
ehh no ur not..?lol idiot
lethal234 3 years ago
this looks like a good movie
sk8terhumes12345 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first
Roary1214 3 years ago
kool
lethal234 3 years ago