@12345anonymousperson ...Argerich's recording is extremely low quality. She does not play anything ugly. he has a great sound in everything she plays... If her interpretation is not what you consider "pretty"...that is a matter of opinion
Its absolutely very impressive piano performance, but it has always been said that Chopin played his music in a soft tone. shouldnt this piece be played not as a fireworks stunner but as a rapid subdued windy sigh????
@otirudam what chopin wanted does not apply in a modern age. the bible preaches that homosexual's should be killed, but why don't we do that? its a modern age. on a modern piano, in a modern concert hall, compromise must be gifted. personally i think its much more electric like he played it.
chopins music is (thank God) very far away from religious discussions, and everybody is entitled to interpret him, in any way they like. But if anybody knows of a pianist that interprets Chopins music in a soft subdued way (as he was supposed to play his own music) please let me know. I would appreciate that very much. Thank you.
Is really hard to believe that Chopin used to play this prelude so fast, I don't think he did and if he did was just to show off. I challenge anybody that's reading this to play this piece really slow and realize the beauty that it is as a composition. Example, play measure 30 and 31, it sounds like a beautiful love song, I wish we could talk to Chopin and ask him how he played this prelude.
I really don't get it, why are all these pianists playing this piece so freakin' fast. I play this piece on the piano, my technique is nowhere near any of these pianists, but I have to say that when the piece is played slow the beauty of the composition really sticks out. Played at this speed it sounds like the pianist is on crack cocaine, like a chipmonk. Anyways, I'm not a classical musician so what I'm saying could be nothing but BS, I really think a lot is lost when played so fast.
@lifeinmusictv A) It's fine playing it slower and all, but what Chopin did with his music was not only to have it serve that purpose, but to also allow a pianist a more freelance way of practicing, (if you haven't noticed, a lot of his pieces are pretty damn difficult) B) they all play it this fast because it is simply dictated in the music, if it were learned any other way, the pianist wouldn't be performing it, they'd just be enjoying it.
You can actually hear the rythm and all the notes when you listen Kissin, I haven't heard better versions. It has more dynamics and a clear structure. All the others are like bunch of notes everywhere, drowning in pedal... And Kissin doesn't play even much slower!
@Rislundman really? I love Kissin but I think Sergio Tiempo has him beat in this one :P maybe the quality of this video makes sergio look better (not that video quality matters, but the sound quality is crap :p)? idk, i think sergios dynamics are amazing. KIssin however, is genius regardless :p
@oas1s2004 I just listened to Sergio Tiempo playing this piece and at 0:18 i felt that Sergio lost the force in his left hand, and at 0:30 Sergio didn't have the same strong base feeling that Kissin has in this clip.
.33-.35~ is a part where Sergio's base just fades away due to pedal use, in theese parts I compare him to kissin where i hear a strong hammering sound of the base, which is something I personally like, i'd say that Sergio used too much pedal for MY taste.
I think that was a really awesome performance. Although his speed is just as fast as many others, he doesn't obscure the melody as much as many do. The line remains clear and audible...wonderful.
man i don't say i don't like him ... actually i adore Kissin and i think he is the best pianist alive plus he plays the piece amazingly but Claudio plays it faster and this didn't matter to me cause the music isn't about speed but what matters is with an amazing speed Arrau expression was great now Evgeny's expression is very good but at a slower speed (still very fast compare to any living pianist) so i admire Arrau's ability to combine enormous speed with deep expression.
@gcaee Of course he did. Argerich may have the technical skill to play this, but she just rushes through it. Yes it's supposed to be fast, but it feels like she's just zipping through it.
@OriginalBasaliskos I completely agree. Sometimes I feel like her tendency to play quickly (for whatever reason, whether it's showing off or simple impatience or taste) makes her miss the point of certain pieces. She has the ability to ingeniously grasp massive concepts in massive pieces, but in other pieces I feel like she completely misses the bus.
@OriginalBasaliskos Interesting! It doesn't surprise me. I'm fond of some of her Chopin (the scherzos, of course, polonaise no6, concertos, etc), but others just really turn me off.
swag
christinendanelian 1 week ago
schön die linke Hand raugeholt. sehr sauber ...bravo
wiesnase8 1 month ago
Mucho Mejor Martha Argerich :) ♥ Mil Veces Mejor
camilita361 2 months ago
Not very good. The left hand is clumsy throughout. And at :35 he loses it momentarily in the right hand too.
ivelosthewilltolive 4 months ago
@ivelosthewilltolive
by your username I can understand why you would say that
Adolf32 4 months ago 7
Standing O!
Bravo!
lllllllllllllll88 5 months ago
He can play anything. This prelude is relentless! Hades is apropos...
lllllllllllllll88 5 months ago
kissin is god.
youcorrupt 5 months ago 2
Argerich's version of this piece is not ugly when you hear it live...trust me...it is for the reason that the video was old...
aizendarwin 5 months ago
Of course we're all entitled to our opinions. I think that the right hand is horribly muddled and uneven.
pianistconductor 5 months ago
His left hand dynamics control is otherworldly.
gunz300 5 months ago 2
increible
lucianoallegroni 6 months ago
phenomenal fingerwork
LuDeLuJia 6 months ago
@12345anonymousperson ...Argerich's recording is extremely low quality. She does not play anything ugly. he has a great sound in everything she plays... If her interpretation is not what you consider "pretty"...that is a matter of opinion
davidbaker03 7 months ago
Oh... my goodness!!
videosuperginko 7 months ago
O O
lllllllllllllll88 7 months ago
Chopin my god he was a freakin beast D:!
PublicLibraryx 9 months ago
The ugliest I have heard so far...
pianopat 9 months ago
@pianopat go fuck yourself
christinendanelian 9 months ago 4
@pianopat Not ugly at all.
OriginalBasaliskos 7 months ago
Dio ti benedica...!
videosuperginko 9 months ago
IMO, argerich has the most effortless performance of this in YTube, particularly in those those LH ocatves
jjg7 9 months ago
bloody dengerous
model23girl23 11 months ago
Its absolutely very impressive piano performance, but it has always been said that Chopin played his music in a soft tone. shouldnt this piece be played not as a fireworks stunner but as a rapid subdued windy sigh????
otirudam 11 months ago
@otirudam what chopin wanted does not apply in a modern age. the bible preaches that homosexual's should be killed, but why don't we do that? its a modern age. on a modern piano, in a modern concert hall, compromise must be gifted. personally i think its much more electric like he played it.
wagneristhebest 11 months ago
chopins music is (thank God) very far away from religious discussions, and everybody is entitled to interpret him, in any way they like. But if anybody knows of a pianist that interprets Chopins music in a soft subdued way (as he was supposed to play his own music) please let me know. I would appreciate that very much. Thank you.
otirudam 11 months ago
and people think playing clocks from coldplay is cool! HAH!
rod3067 1 year ago 4
Evgeny Kissin = The Shredder of the Piano!
kossolas 1 year ago
Is really hard to believe that Chopin used to play this prelude so fast, I don't think he did and if he did was just to show off. I challenge anybody that's reading this to play this piece really slow and realize the beauty that it is as a composition. Example, play measure 30 and 31, it sounds like a beautiful love song, I wish we could talk to Chopin and ask him how he played this prelude.
lifeinmusictv 1 year ago
I really don't get it, why are all these pianists playing this piece so freakin' fast. I play this piece on the piano, my technique is nowhere near any of these pianists, but I have to say that when the piece is played slow the beauty of the composition really sticks out. Played at this speed it sounds like the pianist is on crack cocaine, like a chipmonk. Anyways, I'm not a classical musician so what I'm saying could be nothing but BS, I really think a lot is lost when played so fast.
lifeinmusictv 1 year ago
@lifeinmusictv A) It's fine playing it slower and all, but what Chopin did with his music was not only to have it serve that purpose, but to also allow a pianist a more freelance way of practicing, (if you haven't noticed, a lot of his pieces are pretty damn difficult) B) they all play it this fast because it is simply dictated in the music, if it were learned any other way, the pianist wouldn't be performing it, they'd just be enjoying it.
yodamvpplayer 1 year ago
Arrau
d11os 1 year ago 2
@d11os ... Agree with you...
Ray0X0 1 year ago
HE FINISHED IT IN ONE MINUTE!!!!!!
DAAAAAAAAAANG
he played it better and clearer than Argerich
farah73 1 year ago
You can actually hear the rythm and all the notes when you listen Kissin, I haven't heard better versions. It has more dynamics and a clear structure. All the others are like bunch of notes everywhere, drowning in pedal... And Kissin doesn't play even much slower!
Impressionist1 1 year ago 4
@Impressionist1 exactly!!!!!!!!!
christinendanelian 1 year ago
And that is just what he plays to warm up..
Rislundman 1 year ago 33
@Rislundman really? I love Kissin but I think Sergio Tiempo has him beat in this one :P maybe the quality of this video makes sergio look better (not that video quality matters, but the sound quality is crap :p)? idk, i think sergios dynamics are amazing. KIssin however, is genius regardless :p
oas1s2004 10 months ago
@oas1s2004 I just listened to Sergio Tiempo playing this piece and at 0:18 i felt that Sergio lost the force in his left hand, and at 0:30 Sergio didn't have the same strong base feeling that Kissin has in this clip.
.33-.35~ is a part where Sergio's base just fades away due to pedal use, in theese parts I compare him to kissin where i hear a strong hammering sound of the base, which is something I personally like, i'd say that Sergio used too much pedal for MY taste.
But yes, the quality sucks
Rislundman 10 months ago
never better than argerich, but he mastered it
richclayderman 1 year ago
best of best ,.....very good...oh my god...
kiesworld86 1 year ago
sokolov
sidewinderxx 1 year ago
this is my favorite version of this piece! and of course evgeny kissin is my favorite pianist :)
missglory1 2 years ago
I think that was a really awesome performance. Although his speed is just as fast as many others, he doesn't obscure the melody as much as many do. The line remains clear and audible...wonderful.
MaestroTJS 2 years ago 2
that's a decision your own personality and taste are making. i don't want 'something' more than Chopin intended, and i feel this is it.
dhakhair 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He is great but Claudio Arrau Play it a lot better .
mesho512 2 years ago
I agree - Arrau's recording is one of the best of this piece.
Waldszenen 2 years ago
kissin is young and not experienced yet like the master arrau but i think he can be there sometime in the future
rvn10rvn17 2 years ago
man i don't say i don't like him ... actually i adore Kissin and i think he is the best pianist alive plus he plays the piece amazingly but Claudio plays it faster and this didn't matter to me cause the music isn't about speed but what matters is with an amazing speed Arrau expression was great now Evgeny's expression is very good but at a slower speed (still very fast compare to any living pianist) so i admire Arrau's ability to combine enormous speed with deep expression.
mesho512 2 years ago
& kissin isn't young anymore he is in his forties now as i think .. and he actually had made it to the class of greatest pianists on history.
mesho512 2 years ago
i think he played better than agrerich and her aprentice.
gcaee 2 years ago 25
@gcaee
I just wrote the same thing before i read your comment! :)
we think alike
farah73 1 year ago
@gcaee Of course he did. Argerich may have the technical skill to play this, but she just rushes through it. Yes it's supposed to be fast, but it feels like she's just zipping through it.
OriginalBasaliskos 1 year ago
@OriginalBasaliskos
Don't be stupid !
Both are great.
The55555SSSSS 1 year ago
@The55555SSSSS Of course both are "great," but neither are my favorite.
OriginalBasaliskos 1 year ago
@OriginalBasaliskos I completely agree. Sometimes I feel like her tendency to play quickly (for whatever reason, whether it's showing off or simple impatience or taste) makes her miss the point of certain pieces. She has the ability to ingeniously grasp massive concepts in massive pieces, but in other pieces I feel like she completely misses the bus.
mmoynan 1 year ago
@mmoynan I think I heard her say in an interview once that whenever she played Chopin it never seemed to go the way she wanted it.
OriginalBasaliskos 1 year ago
@OriginalBasaliskos Interesting! It doesn't surprise me. I'm fond of some of her Chopin (the scherzos, of course, polonaise no6, concertos, etc), but others just really turn me off.
mmoynan 1 year ago
@gcaee No... the articulation, clarity, and dynamic control in such fast notes is clearly better in argerich's apprentice
davidbaker03 7 months ago
That really is VERY SOMETHING. Lovin' it (Y) I love from 38-43 seconds.
BenjyTehJet 2 years ago 3
Love it! x
theminx01 3 years ago 3