Secondresponcetoreppress Concerning Bhutto's Death

[BrutusCass]

representativepress What on earth do my videos have to do with you getting banned from posting at Huffington Post. I have 135 Subscribers and 246 people on my friends list, are you now claiming that my videos have effected you! Go and resolve your problems at the source!

[representativepress]

WHY? Because she had just 100 seconds earlier said the name. THAT is why.

It makes no sense at all for her to use the word "murdered" so the whole idea that she said the name she intended on saying made no sense. People stop misdirecting people when the fact is the US government supports horrific crimes.

While you post these illogical videos, I am getting banned from posting at Huffington Post. Do you realize what the REAL political suppression is?

[BrutusCass]

Look First there is nothing illogical in examining thing in death! As you have said the whole idea that she said the name she intended on saying made no sense! If you see no sense then why are you making such a fuss about it?

If you want to claim that your video has any greater logical value then this then you are misleading yourself!

Do you have any idea what MI really is?

I don't think you do, you don't seem able to grasp what I am talking about here!

[BrutusCass]

While you whining about your suppression, we are gearing up to open another front! If you are have problems posting at Huffington Post. I suggest that you complain to them or try posting elsewhere! As if your failure there is in anyway connected to me!

[BrutusCass]

Your comment here makes no sense!

Your video has been viewed 6,267 times this one only 180 time and several times by the same people!

Don't you think that any problems that you are having with posting at Huffington Post are most likely to be due to reaction of people watching your videos!

As to what the REAL political suppression is! I wonder if you really have any idea yourself!

I personally don't trust people who are unwilling to show their face!

[pretender92macgyver]

Or simpler:

"If it wasn't a slip-up; what do the [powers-that-be] have to gain by keeping the 'myth' that Bin-Laden is still alive"

[BrutusCass]

A very good point, and one that many seem to have missed. The problem with all of this is that we are in the realm of speculation and conjecture, however we have certain tools which we can use to analysis these things. The first is Psychology.

 others include geo-strategic thinking.

[BrutusCass]

Both need some study, but are not really as difficult as many would have you believe, they are human thoughts after all, put yourself in various scenarios and take your time to examine different out comes, now on or two will be plain guess work, but enough of them will be pattern forming! Basic observational skills, now that makes you wonder why some people have such and aversion to such methods.

[pretender92macgyver]

It is easier in some instances to prove someone is alive by simply pointing to them and saying 'alive, definitely alive..'; but quite another to prove them not-dead without having the someone to point-out...

I agree here with your thought..

Ayn Rand: "...You cannot challenge a claim to certainty by means of an arbitrary declaration of a counter-possibility, . . . you cannot manufacture possibilities without evidence . . . ."Maybe we should consider the evidence of each, rather then the conject..

[BrutusCass]

Sometimes Ayn Rand did make a lot of sense ;-)) But if you neither have a live Osama nor a dead one, what are you truly left with. Other than the words of others. Yes we must consider all the evidence, even those little piece of little weight, for many little piece can far out weigh one big lie dressed as truth.

[pretender92macgyver]

Why Brutus, you don't mean to infer...of the Bin-Laden inside all of us, would you now... ; ~ )

[camb702]

So, you see these financiers (Red Shields, Rockafeller's et el) as the ones pulling the all strings?

i.e. National Socialists (Na-zi) ??

[BrutusCass]

If you take a little time to look into the history of Germany, from Bismark on (Ferdinand Lassalle is a very interesting chap ;-)), I am still digging into Luther but I am pretty sure that he was either a pawn, or more involved in the game, this is not to say that all was planned back then but a general scope was in mind. As for the Nazi party, the question here is who where the bankers behind the financing of the re-birth of Germany?

[camb702]

Didn't the socialists slip into 2 camps post-WWI (fabian and nationalists)? They were certainly in cahoots with one another (or so I understand).

With regard to the Nazi party, I.G. Farben, Union Bank of America, and Union Oil spring to mind; the postwar ERP under the Marshall Plan was merely a form of economic US imperialism. I'll have to do some more digging on this one (I know Churchill was selling the idea of communist Russia as a threat to Western "democracy").

Thanks for the referral.

[BrutusCass]

Ah the fabians, they weren't part of the Zionists, yes the ideas coincide, but there are many groups and it all gets rather complex.

Have you looked into the members, Orwell and Shaw, now one has to ask what they where up to in their work and writing, they would seem to be give a warning to anyone who was awake enough to listen.

It's a complex game and there are many players, we can take down one or two if we focus and then the others will either have to toe the line or face the same fate.

[BrutusCass]

I would say that Churchill was an honest man (A complete bastard, but honest)he saw what was coming with Germany and then saw the threat with Stalin, his interest lay only in Britain and her Empire, which makes him a bastard, but not in the hands of the Red Shields. There are many crimes and many criminals, I am going after those which are the greatest, I am not so much interested to punishment than true change.

[camb702]

I haven't heard Larouche's views on Nuclear energy/Israel. I do know there are, at present, only 3 countries using depleted uranium munitions (France, UK and the US). I forget how many thousands of tonnes of the stuff we've dumped over Iraq and Bosnia, but I know it does not "go away" once used (half life of ~4.5 million years).

It's shaping up to be a war on resources more than anything else.

[BrutusCass]

Yes a war of resources, but it is more of who will control those, and it will not be the British or The Americans, they may be under the delusion that they will, Just as the Germans where Fooled into playing along with the plans of the Khazarian pretenders.

[camb702]

I'll admit, I've not heard Larouche (or Tarpley for that matter) talking much on Israel's involvement in all of this (maybe a mention of 1917 Balfour Declaration, blame the Anglo-Dutch imperialists, business as usual). Maybe they [Israel] are merely a receivership arm for the oligarchy of the City of London.

I always remember Bill Cooper charmingly referring to the U.S. as the United States of Israel (see PNAC, AIPEC, Rahm Emmanuel, 1953 attack on USS Liberty, and so forth).

[BrutusCass]

They both seem to side steep the Rothschild issue! Which is the one true and continuous connection in all of this, I have not read all of their stuff, but as yet have not come across any they have stated about the Leftist (socialist) Zionists, who where wiped out in Europe between 1940 and 1950, the Rothschilds belong the the Right wing (national Socialist) Zionists! Just something to consider! Fed ref 1914, Balfour Rothschild agreement 1917, this was a very interesting move.

[camb702]

Good observation. You're certainly way ahead of me on this (I'm still learning as I go along so to speak).

I only began researching all this a few weeks ago (there's some serious catching up to do).

((-:

[BrutusCass]

Be careful in your research, don't get lost down the rabbit whole, many are digging blindly and many others are falling in, look for your own truth, take all information as interest and do your own research into things, be satisfied with you own truth, but at the same time always try to disprove your self, that is the true scientific method. Whatever is left however improbable.... ;-))

[camb702]

Nice video (so that's you).

I agree, the geostrategic significance of Pakistan is immense; south of Russia, a corridor joining between Iran and China, and a serving entrance point to the Persian Gulf.

It would be coup for the Anglo-Dutch establishment. They're certainly trying their utmost to sell us the idea.

(R.I.P. Bhutto)

Peace.

[BrutusCass]

Yes that's my ugly mug ;-)) The British have been working on this since 1904 (lord Mckinder's pivot and his Heart land report of 1914 to the royal society) I have just added a link to give a little more idea on this. I see that you have up loaded Webster Tarpley on Mumbai Attacks, I will watch them later, in the warmth of my home;-)) I say this because I saw him a few years ago here in Milan, in a very Cold old school hall one evening in winter ;-)

[camb702]

Thanks, Brutus (I'll check out the link you provided). With so much (dis)information out there it's hard to know what to digest without going mad (I'm sprinting just to keep up). Part of the problem is some are so eager for truth that they'll blindly accept anything running contrary to public opinion (equally as dangerous).

So you met Tarpley? Heh. He does get around it seems. Very similar in thinking to Lyndon Larouche I find.

[BrutusCass]

Yes that is a big problem, and one I know well, it is the main reason that I have held back on really stating very much on what is going on in the world today. I will not say that I am 100% in agreement with Tarpley though I do find his research to be very interesting and well based on historical facts, I asked him what he suggested as a solution to the problems he was exposing, but he didn't provide any answer!

[BrutusCass]

He does share a lot with Larouche, I agree less with him and am a little suspect as to his concepts of certain things. My main problem with the Larouche Camp here on YouTube is that the filter comments and are not open to debate! He thoughts on Nuclear energy and Israel also worry me a little. As I have stated here the Nuclear issue is a none stater. It has been predicted that demand for Uranium will out strip supply by 2018 under present plans!

[BrutusCass]

So that means more conflict for control of the sources and inefficiently and malpractice in mining a clean up. The mining of Uranium is not a clean operation.