athiest are well i am anyways there are diffrent types of people i dont believe in god bc i dont know where we come from i dont know and its okay to say that i dont know yet that doesnt mean i have to put god in the blank people in the middle ages thought it was the will of god that people died of plague they didnt know what disease is so they substitute it for god but it didnt mean they right it was god who did it it was a virus ,
If we all came from the furnace of a dying star, then who created that star? The theory of evolution lacks an origin which only religion holds. You might say we are volcanic ash or pieces of a dying star, but that star didn't pop out of nowhere.
@IliketoGHOSS The theory of evolution explains the existance of all these species and how they were created, not the creation of the universe. Nice strawman, and I reflect the question back to you- if something complex always needs a creator, who created god? And who created him? And the one who created that one?
@TomRaphaelWolf No the thing about god is he was supposed to be the origin, he didn't have to be created. Thats what the theory is at least. And i didn't say that the theory of evolution is supposed to have an origin, I'm saying there is a reason it doesn't have an origin, because there is no other reasonable answer besides a higher being.
@IliketoGHOSS If something complex can be "the origin" why can't something simple that has the same rules (cannot be created or destroyed) be the same? Why can't matter just "exist" forever- its change into something able to sustain life being seen as everything being "created". And lol. The theory of evolution goes very well without need of a deity.
@TomRaphaelWolf If matter existed forever man would progress at a way slower rate due to overpopulation. The world would be full of useless people who serve no innovative purpose to the planet. The world would be a pig sty.
@IliketoGHOSS If matter existed forever it would answer the "where did everything come from"- it never "came" from anything. It's been there all along, but its form changes. If matter existed forever, that would explain the "Well, what created that?" paradox that not even your run of the mill god can solve. Matter existing forever =/= hindering progress. Matter thankfully CHANGES FORM and pollutes the earth in different ways (Carbon dioxide, etc.). Just like it CHANGES FORM to create life.
@IliketoGHOSS Saying just because we don't know what happened before the formation of the Universe, doesn't mean you can put God in the gap. The fact Christians have to keep falling back and revising their ideas speaks volumes as to how much conviction they really have. A few hundred years ago, God made everything as it was. Now most of you have to conceed the Earth was formed by planetary formation, and the Universe began after the Big Bang. Won't be long until you have to fall back again.
@IliketoGHOSS There's no reason why you'd ask why "Someone" created it. The point of this video is that your stance offers NO EMPIRICALLY TESTED EVIDENCE for your claims, all the while you place it on par with evolution and claim to know it as fact.
I've read morals and dogma and was sucked into it too. Notice how all the mythologies and gods of each respective culture on earth all have the same stories. The reason why this is is because they were all contacting the same demonic entities just under different names. Also Satan stole the identity of Lucifer to make it appear like he is the lightbringer.Isaiah 12 was referring to the King of Babylon not Satan.It's a deception just like Christ was based off of Krishna please look at my channel.
can someone just explain to me why christians believe the earth to be 6000 years old? this is a serious question as I went to a catholic school and never heard of this until i was at least 25, and im a bit confused as to where it comes from. (im not a christian anymore by the way, would just like to know the why's and how's
your video is well informed....im curious what u have to say about race differences in human beings...u seem to be suggesting evolution of physical traits through geographic adaptation or isolation. what do u have to say about MC1R found in blue eyed whites of blood type o.....and why does no old world ape have type o blood ?? yet type O makes up 43% or all humans and is common to the white human race...
gorillas are type B and chimps are Type A, orangutans can be both A or B.
all speculation at best ,IF man evolved from apes hwere did the apes come from ?what is the origin of life? a primordial soup that was hit by lighting ? lmaooooo and he questions gods creation.
"Finally, about 200 000 years ago, Homo Sapiens arose from Homo Erectus in Africa, and about 140 000 later, followed the footsteps of Homo Erectus, eventually populating the world, taming livestock, cultivating crops, building cities and inventing gods."
Oh - as you see, believers, the God concept came very, very, very late in the evolution.
I keep saying this over and over and over. Just because evolution exists and its proven by science still doesn't mean God doesn't exist. I don't get where the idea that a God doesn't exist just because the bible and or religion was wrong. Its a fucking book for Gods sakes and the religion was based on what people believed but it still does NOT count out the possibility that a higher power created us originally. Besides religion is faith based. If faith was easy then it wouldn't acceptable.
@Onizuma13 I keep saying THIS. In any culture, in any religion, in ANY time in history, there is not one SPECK of VERIFIABLE evidence for ANY god. . . E - V - E - R . . N - O - N - E ! ! ZERO. But this astonishing revelation just bounces off the bucket you wear on your head. Why would the supposed creator of every atom and every outcome not leave the religiously afflicted ONE instance of VERIFIABLE evidence to back their INSANE claims, and debunk the Athiests ? He/she/it doesn't exist ! !
@Onizuma13 I disagree, faith is easy for it can be indoctrinated. All you need to have faith is to fill the gap of ignorance with "god did it," instead of I don't know yet. It much easier to believe the teaching of your parents, church, community, and culture than relying on reason and logic to engage in scientific inquiries. It's even harder to forgo your beliefs once the evidences prove them to be wrong.
@Onizuma13 so your saying people who claim that the bible is the true word of god and accept it as such, can still believe in god if we prove one thing wrong in the bible, why would there be something thats wrong in the bible if god is perfect? surely his words would be nothing but perfect? and with evolution we win either way, cus if we evolved from primordial ooze then theres no god, but then if u say god made the ooze, it took billions of year for us to get here not 7 days, so we win again :D
@lisn92 Humans made the bible. Not God. The bible has been translated over into English and whatever other languages. Do you think the bible was the bible in Noahs time? No because for one the bible didn't exist back then and two people we're speaking a different language. The bible was translated from old religious scrolls or something. Don't quote me on that. I just know that humans rewrote it over & over. Its not like john whatever heard Gods voice and wrote the entire thing over night.
@lisn92 So obviously (adding to what I wrote) the bible isn't perfect because God didn't write it. People did over time. Some may have been directly from God. Thats all speculation but a lot of it is just religious history. Also who's to say if its all truth? Too me its really just a huge parable and jesus christ himself spoke in parables so fuck it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this guy is soooooo stupid....wow. evolutionists say how can anyone believe in something thats just solely pure faith....well...they believe the earth formed accidently 20 billion years ago...how the hell can you possibly know that? thats solely on faith also. especially to believe it all happened by chance...lllmmmmaaaaooo...omg...im dying here. one thing is apparently inherent here...STUPIDITY!!!!!!
@polo1178 I'll preface this by saying that I am on your side in disagreeing with him but your argument is flawed when you consider the size of the universe. take a million coins and tell me to flip them all. Most likely they will be close to 50% heads and 50% tails bu that doesn't mean that it is impossible that they all land heads. with the amount of places in the universe, it is not a stretch to believe that something profound would occur somewhere. The age of the earth is estimated using data
WOW....willingly ignorant. do you know how amazing the human body is? we cant come anywhere near the brilliance of creating a human life. way to complex..yet, we're here. how can it be anything but god to create us? an accident? lmao...wow. chances are..none of you ppl even picked up a bible. therefore, you'll try to explain everything with your level of understanding.you do not want to retain god in your knowledge.
When evolutionists explain to me where the very first atom came from, then I will believe. I dont believe that something came from nothing. Everything has a source.
Where matter came from doesn't have anything to do with evolution. Evolution takes place on matter. Evolution doesn't claim to have explanatory power about the formation of matter.
My understanding is that high energy gamma rays likely collided to create matter. I doubt this resolves your issues with evolution.
I wouldn't call myself an evolutionist. I'm not devoted to evolution. Evolution just seems to fit the evidence I've seen maybe a better explanation will come along.
Well lets see if you can do better, no man has ever seen something born outside of its kind.Do you contend to know what other molecules can be used in creating life?In fact the synthetically created cells that man has made uses the same genetic code,hence this proves creation in the sense that it took intelligences to make life.
darwin proved God's existence when he filled his theory with INTENTIONS of creation and change. It's like the physicists' argument - the universe can and has created itself from "nothing" but we don't know WHY. "why?" is key here... With respect to life on earth the truth is probably in the middle - creationists can explain the beginning, evolutionists the rest...
No one can explain the unknowable. God is invisible and remains obscure. God clothed himself in light. I will try to explain faith. All good hearted people love the message of Jesus and believe. Sometimes our faith is tested and some lose faith.
When a person comes to Jesus with a contrite heart and hears the words of love and peace it resonates with his being. God heals the broken hearted. A persons faith grows.
@oldlite I am actually very glad you brought up the topic of the eye, because it has been part of the debate against evolution, mainly because some cannot fathom how such a thing could be created through mutation and adaptation. Since I don't have many words here, i will say i am not refuting any claim of yours, I respect all theories because I can learn from them, i just want to share ideas. Please message me because i want to teach and learn about both of our topics more in depth. Thanks
@oldlite "evolution can not explain the complexities of say the eye"
I'm no biologist but after a quick Google search I was able to find plenty of information that explains the evolution of the eye. It's complicated stuff and we're talking about hundreds of millions of years, but that's what evolution is. It sounds to me like you're unwilling to research anything that would contradict your version of "the truth".
@oldlite "evolution can not explain the complexities of say the eye"
Bullshit, not only can it explain, we pretty much have the evidence of its evolution right before our eyes. Namely the more primitive eyes of more primitive species, right down to the light sensitive skin of some platworms.
Mutation may not be evolution, but its is a vital part of it.
I have to admit that i love when creationists bring up the eye, because if there was creation, not evolution, its actually the glaring exemple that the creator was a moron.
The receptive membrane in our eyes actually faces backwards, in our heads, while the axons of the neurons attached to them, are facing outside. This causes us to have our blind spots where these "cables" are collected into one bundle. If someone designed this, he or she must have been really stupid. All it would take...
@oldlite Oh whistling dixie up your anus !! now there is a evolutionary leap!!! Maybe there is no need for evolution to correct it I see just fine that would be the best reason. As far as god being stupid welll he dosent exist so his stupidity is irrelevent..
@oldlite I'm pretty sure Hyeesa is not calling evolution stupid. They are pointing out the difference in eye structure between us and octopi. And one reason for the eye to stop 'evolving' is that we have other means of compensating for that 'blind spot'. Our ears for example, if you're looking in a bush and can't see a rabbit, your ears will tell you something is there if it moves, same for the nose with odors. We can compensate in other ways, thus eliminating the need to change the eye
All it would take it to make it correctly, is to turn around the receptor membrane.
Interestingly enough it was done correctly for some animals. Namely, octopus and their relatives. They dont suffer from this problem. I mean what the hell god? He cared enough for sealife but not for the design of the human body apparently.
So you decide. Evolution? Or the god who apparently favors octopuses to you. :D
This perfectly demonstrates the absurdity of so-called "intelligent Design." Another couple of examples which help to drive this point home is; a god giving us one tube to eat & breathe with! Thousands a year choke to death b/c of this brilliant design. The other example means much to us guys, and that is; a designer who runs our urinary tube strait thru the Prostate Gland...a sure recipe for serious trouble.
Funny u should mention that. After some considerable time studying scripture & early Judaism, I've come to the conclusion that you may very well be right. To get a really good insight into how much this bible war god despised man, take a serious study of the story of Job....and that's just one of the better examples. This bible god was a barbarian (just like the men who invented him), and downright evil!
@Cootabux The Hebrews were His 'favorite' though. 300 hundred years as slaves, 40 years in the desert, allowed His son to be railroaded and crucified, hated by seemingly ever other tribe, race or peoples since time began, 6,000,000 slaughtered by the Nazi's, and if all that isn't bad enough, oh yeah, cut the ends of your dicks off. Hey Yahweh, no more favors OK?
If He treats His favorites with such hatred, it's no wonder He shits on the rest of us. :)
Fantastic video. Well spoken, with clarity and detail. I've been watching a lot of videos that break down the processes of evolution which are often misrepresented and misunderstood by propagandists, and this is one of my favorites so far. I'm going to keep this one handy. Thanks!
Similarity of DNA, genetics or diets, all support common designer. "All living creatures have the same DNA it is merely put together differently, by the same designer.".......The law of common designer.
The main problem in reconstructing the origins of man is lack of fossil evidence: all there is could be displayed on a dinner table." - New Scientist 20 May 1982 pg 491.
"Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various interpretations. Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is absent altogether". (Henry Gee, Nature vol. 412 p. 131, 2001).What did he say? "extensive fossil records?he lies,
@xtiml "The main problem in reconstructing the origins of man is lack of fossil evidence: all there is could be displayed on a dinner table." - New Scientist 20 May 1982 pg 491"
Not only is this a 30 year old quote (30 years of additional hominid fossil collection), but isn't accurate. That would have to be one VERY large dinner table. :)
recent evidence for an out of place red shift presented by Halton Arp recently in the Astrophysical Journal (10 February 2005). Arp and fellows have found a quasar with an extreme red shift of z = 2.114 embedded within galaxy NGC 7319 with a red shift of only z = 0.022. The reason they believe the galaxy and quasar are connected is because of observed gaseous interaction between the two. Evidence such as this strongly suggests that red shift has nothing to do with distance, nor expansion.
"It can be stressed , however, that discordant red shifts are not discovered in just one or two cases that have no relation . in all cases we test - large clusters, groups, companions to nearby galaxies, companions to middle distance galaxies, companions linked by luminous filaments, galaxies interacting gravitationally, chains of galaxies - in every conceivable case, we come out with the same answer: the same discordant red shifts for the same general class of younger, fainter galaxies"
quantity of energy in the Universe is constant. Thus, the cosmic egg could not come into being from nothing. . According to the Big Bang theory, asked to believe that all this energy came into being from nothing!Explosions are anything but accurate! "Explosions throw matter out, the Big Bang mysteriously produced the opposite , with matter clumping in galaxies Another problem is that a explosion has led to a ordered system of galaxies systems near perfect back ground radiation
@xtiml "asked to believe that all this energy came into being from nothing!"
You agreed with my previous statement..."very true.thank you." If you do agree, then you know that nobody is asking to to believe in anything. Science is a tool used to solve problems. You don't believe in science, you use it to solve problems. I suppose you could believe in your hammer if you like, but a hammer won't do anything until you use it.
In fact, in an unchanging environment, stabilizing selection would tend to keep an organism largely unchanged. if we are to believe that life began in the primordial broth as single celled organisms such as bacteria, then why are fossilised examples of bacteria such as cyanobacteria identical to living cyanobacteria today? If the environment for all these organism was such that they did not need to change, where was the environment that caused all the changes?
I have been exposed to these professorsI accepted evolution with out much examination and then i got outside uni and recently available free info not taught in schoolsturns it all upside down,history anthropology(not regarded as hard science by the way..I know what they are from all the info they left out(on purpose)to instill a desired mind direction.still question remains,radiation had beneficial mutation? name one...
It is significant that, according to evolutionists, no fossils of chimpanzee have ever been found. Some have suggested that fossil chimpanzees and other primates actually have been found but they were interpreted as human ancestors rather than as fossil primates.The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change ...... All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions are abrupt.
Fail, all life is based on matter, and this is energy. Without it no carbon based life could exist. Even if evolution is true it is not the beginning.
You need to be looking at when the Earth was without form and void to be anywhere near the beginning of life.
Even if we do come from chimps, correct me if I am wrong but the beast/animals was created before we were according to the bible, and before those came the fish and the plants etc. . Sound familiar?
OH MY GOD U LEGEND I LOVED UR BIT " SHOW ME THE FOSSIL OF JUDUS" Halarious m8 i genuinely laughed out loud well done m8 , i'm studying evolutionary biology at university and i'm so sharing this . thanks man u made evolution funny. go on son
It is important to understand that their is a BIG, BIG difference between science and religious belief systems. Science is a tool used to solve problems. Religious belief systems are things you believe in. You don't believe in science. Instead, you use it to solve problems just like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems. Science and religious belief systems are completely unrelated and unfit for comparison.
@TCupUK "Science has a history of being proven wrong. It is not infallible."
Failure is one of sciences virtues. Science isn't "truth"; rather, it is a tool used to solve problems. It's wrong all the time. Each time it is wrong, something new is learned which strengths it.
@TCupUK "Science has a history of being proven wrong. It is not infallible."
Failure is one of sciences virtues. Science isn't "truth"; rather, it is a tool used to solve problems. It's wrong all the time. Each time it is wrong, something new is learned which strengths it.
No problem! Unfortunately, many people confuse science with a religious belief system. They are inclined to "believe" in useful scientific models, theories, principles and laws. Chemists don't "believe" in atomic theory, they use it to solve problems... and they do it all the time. Vaccines don't make themselves... instead APPLICATION of the evolutionary model is what improves vaccines. NOT belief.
This video was 4 years ago, and some things he states is now invalid. We just don't have all the answers, and can only speak of what is proven at the time...which can change the next day. That's the only thing that irks me...Freaking egomaniacs. One thing I know for sure, is that Science and Spirituality HAS to work together, or we'll blow ourselves up because of EGO. There's evidence we HAVE destroyed ourselves before, possibly 3 times, & had to start over from nothing. I believe it.
Ok, so if the viral dna has to have a living cell to inject into....where did the living cell come from? I'm talking about original creation...the chances of viruses finding themselves pure living cells to start growing is way too far out. I thought it was bacteria however...not viruses. What about the Flagella? These organisms are described by some scientists as being gears and motors, like a boat motor. Some might call this of God, but I call it an intelligence we don't quite understand.
the priets of science can be just as dogmatic and dishonest as any other human and they are.if you dopnt go along with the line you aint going anywhere.read about the woamn digging in mexico who found way out of palce stuff and she insisted on presenting they took her tenure and flushed her down the toilet.if it upsets their rice bowl they bury it dent it or discredit it.such ascomets aint ice and rock bslls jamming around and the sun isnt a giant nuclear reactor,it is smug to think all is known
insects have much of the same dna as humans,he says there are numerous fossills demonstrating evolution from so called lower human forms.when in fact it is very scarce and dubious at best.Lies of ommission are common. many scientits dont believe in evolution and there is not much proof and never has it been demonstrated beyond doubt that a lower animal changed into a higer animal ,he leaps of logic as chimps and hunmans cmmon ancestor ,reasonable accuracy? he is pure speculation and bad ones.
insects have much of the same dna as humans,he says there are numerous fossills demonstrating evolution from so called lower human forms.when in fact it is very scarce and dubious at best.Lies of ommission are common. many scientits dont believe in evolution and there is not much proof and never has it been demonstrated beyond doubt that a lower animal changed into a higer animal ,he leaps of logic as chimps and hunmans cmmon ancestor ,reasonable accuracy he is pure speculation and bad ones.
@Xenophile665 radiation has NEVER made a beneficial mutation for animals,name one if so.evolution is a religion requiring faith in liars and puffy professors in their ivy halls of the mis educatuion system.they need these long time sopans to splain the oh so gradual and quite remarkable changes, do you believe in shapeshifting? what about all the massive boneyards all over the earth?and no i dont think earth is 10 thou years old but mayhaps the grand canyon was formed quickly not in eons
@xtiml Asserting that "evolution is a religion requiring faith in liars" is a logical fallacy. The available evidence supports evolution.
Biologists don't "need these long time spans." Radiometric evidence supports them. No evidence suggests otherwise.
What do "shapeshifting" and "massive boneyards" have to do with this discussion?
"MAYHAP the grand canyon was formed quickly not in eons?" The only "evidence" to support this is baseless assumption claimed by an actual liar, Kent Hovind.
fossilized huamns footprints in same fossils as dinosaurs,shapeshifting is akin to species change and the boneyards have everykind of animal in them from fuish to dinasaurs to everything that was alive including animals not supposed to be together alive at the time. you believe himans have only been around 40 50 thousdand years?what about pottery and obviously man made items found deep in coal mines, and dinasaurs drawn on pottery ,and cave drawings of humans that look like cartoon portraits?
You ever seen someone try to explain Chess to a four-year-old?
xtiml is clearly either uneducated, unable to think, or both. You aren't going to make any progress with him, I'm afraid. He's got his mind so filled with nonsense that he's practically immune to reason, rational thought. "The priests of science can be just as dogmatic..." He's clearly never even tried to understand science, he just parrots what he's been told to believe... and that's good enough for him it seems.
@xtiml BTW, stating that "evolution is a religion" is flawed logic. There is no dogma in science, unlike religion. Science is based on evidence, not faith. If a scientist has evidence that supports a view that conflicts with previous hypotheses, then it is accepted by the scientific community.
Honest scientists look for evidence. Dishonest "scientists" declare their hypotheses as truth (dogmatic inference). Men such as Hovind, Hamm, Behe and Gish are examples of dishonest "scientists."
@Xenophile665 comets are not balls of ice and rocks,the sun is not a giant nuclear reactor,the red shift is for expanding univere is flawed as to be unreliable,exploding universe is not a fact,do you believe in magic?were you taught truth and nothing but the truth in your education?lol.
@xtiml Comets are composed of ice and rocks. The sun is a nuclear reactor. The red shift does clarify the theory of an expanding universe. All of this is based on evidence. Your assertions, lacking evidence, are based on your opinion, which is irrelevant.
No, I don't believe in magic. No, I was taught falsehoods along with truths in my education. Most of the falsehoods stemmed from early religious upbringing.
Sadly Creationists will have stopped listening to this video about 2 seconds in. They decisively and willfully reject actually knowledge in favor of fairy tales.
Religion aside, here is a question i hope you can answer. Evolution theory says that we evolved from Apes. But what if it was the opposite, what if Apes evolved from humans. Once it was thought that dodos evolved into pigeons, but later it was found that pigeons was the ones that evolved into dodos.We like to think we are supremo with our intelligent. But in the world of mother nature, a hand to hand battle, An ape would win a battle, as they are stronger and better climbers than us
We had a common ape ancestor BOTH chimps and us but we parted ways and survived BOTH in our new respective environment. Evolution has no goal, in a billion years the most intelligent creaturer on earth will look nothing like we do today. We're just a snapshot.
Pigeons did not evolve INTO anything. They changed over time to not only dodos but a lot of other birds as well..
If we move to a valley where there are no strong competition we'll survive. No need for battles ...
The "god" is just illusion in brain of the lost soul!!! If the god made us, do ju really think that he need to write down how to live, in some farytales book like bible or koran?!? Much easyer to him will be that he implant this into our brains, dont u think that! If we have a car, we dont need to hike!
But anyway bible is a nice farytale of old storis, who made dragon of a lizard, and a giant from the warior!
This is like blowing up a junkyard and it all lands in one place as a 1920 Ford model A.Can you tell me why the # of chromosomes are randomly scattered thruoghout species?It doesn't follow a pattern according to how intellegent a creature is. Humans 46,etc.This is why dogs and cats could never haveoffspring. Fact is that the fossil record is vast and yet not one half this or half that exists.All your quotes of neandrethals etc. were exposed as frauds by the scientific community of their day.
@dragonloses I'm no pro but if you look at developing young inside any mammal. And many other animals too, You will see that a the early stages of dolphin, elephant, human cats, dogs etc start from a similar stage. Also note how humans have tails then loose them during development.
@dragonloses Evolution never says that an organism will be half cat and half dog this isnt fucking pokemon where things simply change abruptly. And its not like your ridiculous metaphor. Evolution doesnt have a goal. THe 1920 ford model would need a goal in mind. The thing is, evolution has been witnessed it is demontrably true. How else would you explain how bacteria become immune to vaccinations.
@asdfbobbyasdf Bacteria adapting to be drug resistant is a far cry from proving evolution..Used to be an atheist and evolutionist myself.Why isn't the fossil record full of transistional animals?Lies are still in school and college textbooks.Look into my comment about the dna structure and the # of Chromosones.They are staggered without rhyme or reason,if it was proof of evolution it would follow a pattern according to known laws.Life breaks down and makes things simpler,water flows downhill,etc
@dragonloses See i don't know that answer, but im sure if you ask a BIOLOGIST they could give you a REAL answer. And the fossil record is full of transitional forms. There are videos dedicated on this sight to nothing BUT transitional forms that we know of. Of course it isn't going to be perfect since EVERY GENERATION IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM. No matter how trans fossils are found, Creatards are always going to ask for the inbetween steps. To say there are no trans. forms is a profound lie.
@Samura1gamer Because you are not supposed to think. So, let's see, that would be 400 members of the television worshipping crowd. Show them this on Television and they would be an absolutely captive, hypnotized audience. Why do you suppose that is?
@isurfu2ube yes maybe he does reject the biblical god's existence.whats the difference between u and him? u reject thousands of religions and tens of thousands of gods already. he happens to reject one more and he bases that to his logic. do u have any other instrument in ur disposal beyond human logic?
@Samura1gamer Because a lot of people enjoy bearing false witness, when they say they believe in a literal translation of the Bible. As in Adam and Eve didn't just have two boys, and the boys married girls. One of the girls being from land of Nod... which is the literal part of the Bible you can stick all of evolution and the age of the universe into. Instead, they think that they did have girls too, but someone forgot to write it down, and that the whole "from the land of Nod" thing was a typo.
@greedyfoot u can stick all the evolution science in the bible just because it says "there was a girl in the land of nod" ? there are more things to it than just the mysterious whereabouts of someone's wife.
Nothing that is said in the bible corresponds to scientific findings.absolutely nothing. It's hard to imagine why would god deliberately sends us looking in the opposite direction.
@Samura1gamer Not science for me, maybe for some people our own frontal lobes are the enemy, for me its the reptilian voice within me and all its superstition and fear it can bring.
@Samura1gamer I suspect it's because after almost 15 minutes of explanation he decides to antagonize by making fun of religion. As a result, all he's done up to that point goes out the window, and those Christians who were fence sitters and who might have been convinced by the evidence and arguments he's given just tune him out as another enemy of Christianity. They are pushed in the direction of Creationism, not away from it. Pity, because the rest of the video is good.
@Naiant u r probably right.when i wrote that comment i hadn't finished watching the video. still,a christian watching a science video knows in advance that a "QUICK,CHANGE THE CHANNEL" moment coming when science crosses roads with religion and that is the real pity
@Samura1gamer According to this video some human baby had a chimp for a mother. And that baby went off to produce people as we know it now. get out of here.
@oldlite take my advice;open up a book (not the bible) about evolution and notice how u will not find a statement like that in it. or do something easier and download some documentaries from torrents "pbs nova becoming human" recommended
no human was born from monkeys.everything is a transitional being between their ancestor and their descendant.today's animals werent present 100 mil years ago nor will they be 100m years after.u are a transitional being between Homo heidelbergensis and the next
Baby steps to Christianity is Atheism! Because they work sooooooooo hard to disprove Christianity and its their favorite subject? Why might you say? I guess its that curiosity that God put into human brains to find out what really going on and who created us why are we created and who is the creator?
So thanks for taking a leap of faith in your Creator your making the right decision!
Most Atheists become believers because they come to the point they cannot rebel against the shocking facts!!
@MindfulFuture Just a thought. The only way 'God' can control all is to BE all. Basically God IS the actual universe. And let's be honest, even God has to obey rules of science. So if God is consists of every molecule in exsistance. It probably explains why God doesn't care if he drops a church roof on more of 'himself'.
Well that's what a funny Red dude with pointy horns told me.
@stufaman I agree. My point was, unexplained 'creation' by a deity itself requires an explanation. It's an ever regressing tautology otherwise..'..god did it..'
Wonderfully informative with use of clear language and descriptions so that even the average joe (like me ^^) can understand it. Thank you brilliant video
lol at 3:00 bears really like it doggy style phnarrf phnarrf! ...which is interesting given their genetic relationship to dogs... other than that... excellent video... 5 stars... 6 if they were available....and subscribed...
You are an excellent communicator. so drop the ticker... or if its for the hard of hearing...then please make it a little smaller.
first of all how is genetic evidence planted by a thing that cannot be detected? god and satan cannot be dected in our physical reality because it dosent exist. wake up and apply some critical thinking. just because someting happens that you do not or cannot understand dosent mean an enitity like god or satan did it. thats like saying god makes it rain when you do not know meterology.
Is this video suppose to show evidence of Darwinist evolution? If it was, then it's a fail! So our DNA is related to bananas...Yeah, so? God created all creatures & plants from the same source. Tell us something we don't already know!
Dude... they have found FOSSILS OF GIANTS...
1xThreeDaysGrace1x 3 days ago
chuck norris will kick any1s ass
Machinegunkitteh1 3 weeks ago
Just a theory.
willfreedo 4 weeks ago in playlist Playlist . . . OF DOOM!!!
Simply beautiful!
offwithurhead 2 months ago
Some say: God is dead! That is not true. God never existed!
WalterJoergLangbein 3 months ago 2
What kind of genius designer builds the sewer-drain right through the amusement-park?
WalterJoergLangbein 3 months ago 2
CLAPS !!!! Great ,consistent and Solid dude , thanks.
FractalSequoia 3 months ago
fantastic video.
lazycackle 4 months ago
athiest are well i am anyways there are diffrent types of people i dont believe in god bc i dont know where we come from i dont know and its okay to say that i dont know yet that doesnt mean i have to put god in the blank people in the middle ages thought it was the will of god that people died of plague they didnt know what disease is so they substitute it for god but it didnt mean they right it was god who did it it was a virus ,
killuall9999 5 months ago
If we all came from the furnace of a dying star, then who created that star? The theory of evolution lacks an origin which only religion holds. You might say we are volcanic ash or pieces of a dying star, but that star didn't pop out of nowhere.
IliketoGHOSS 5 months ago
@IliketoGHOSS The theory of evolution explains the existance of all these species and how they were created, not the creation of the universe. Nice strawman, and I reflect the question back to you- if something complex always needs a creator, who created god? And who created him? And the one who created that one?
TomRaphaelWolf 5 months ago
@TomRaphaelWolf No the thing about god is he was supposed to be the origin, he didn't have to be created. Thats what the theory is at least. And i didn't say that the theory of evolution is supposed to have an origin, I'm saying there is a reason it doesn't have an origin, because there is no other reasonable answer besides a higher being.
IliketoGHOSS 5 months ago
@IliketoGHOSS If something complex can be "the origin" why can't something simple that has the same rules (cannot be created or destroyed) be the same? Why can't matter just "exist" forever- its change into something able to sustain life being seen as everything being "created". And lol. The theory of evolution goes very well without need of a deity.
TomRaphaelWolf 5 months ago
@TomRaphaelWolf If matter existed forever man would progress at a way slower rate due to overpopulation. The world would be full of useless people who serve no innovative purpose to the planet. The world would be a pig sty.
IliketoGHOSS 5 months ago
@IliketoGHOSS If matter existed forever it would answer the "where did everything come from"- it never "came" from anything. It's been there all along, but its form changes. If matter existed forever, that would explain the "Well, what created that?" paradox that not even your run of the mill god can solve. Matter existing forever =/= hindering progress. Matter thankfully CHANGES FORM and pollutes the earth in different ways (Carbon dioxide, etc.). Just like it CHANGES FORM to create life.
TomRaphaelWolf 5 months ago
@IliketoGHOSS Saying just because we don't know what happened before the formation of the Universe, doesn't mean you can put God in the gap. The fact Christians have to keep falling back and revising their ideas speaks volumes as to how much conviction they really have. A few hundred years ago, God made everything as it was. Now most of you have to conceed the Earth was formed by planetary formation, and the Universe began after the Big Bang. Won't be long until you have to fall back again.
andromidius 4 months ago
@IliketoGHOSS There's no reason why you'd ask why "Someone" created it. The point of this video is that your stance offers NO EMPIRICALLY TESTED EVIDENCE for your claims, all the while you place it on par with evolution and claim to know it as fact.
Bleumange 4 weeks ago
I've read morals and dogma and was sucked into it too. Notice how all the mythologies and gods of each respective culture on earth all have the same stories. The reason why this is is because they were all contacting the same demonic entities just under different names. Also Satan stole the identity of Lucifer to make it appear like he is the lightbringer.Isaiah 12 was referring to the King of Babylon not Satan.It's a deception just like Christ was based off of Krishna please look at my channel.
Ravenous11yt 6 months ago
can someone just explain to me why christians believe the earth to be 6000 years old? this is a serious question as I went to a catholic school and never heard of this until i was at least 25, and im a bit confused as to where it comes from. (im not a christian anymore by the way, would just like to know the why's and how's
Richdavt 6 months ago
Read the book "one heart beat away". open your mind for once
ridgearice149 6 months ago
your video is well informed....im curious what u have to say about race differences in human beings...u seem to be suggesting evolution of physical traits through geographic adaptation or isolation. what do u have to say about MC1R found in blue eyed whites of blood type o.....and why does no old world ape have type o blood ?? yet type O makes up 43% or all humans and is common to the white human race...
gorillas are type B and chimps are Type A, orangutans can be both A or B.
so wheres the O
MyBelowme 6 months ago
@MyBelowme Type O could be just limited to humans, they didn't necessarily have to had had it passed down by a common ancestor.
TomRaphaelWolf 6 months ago
all speculation at best ,IF man evolved from apes hwere did the apes come from ?what is the origin of life? a primordial soup that was hit by lighting ? lmaooooo and he questions gods creation.
prime440 6 months ago
"Finally, about 200 000 years ago, Homo Sapiens arose from Homo Erectus in Africa, and about 140 000 later, followed the footsteps of Homo Erectus, eventually populating the world, taming livestock, cultivating crops, building cities and inventing gods."
Oh - as you see, believers, the God concept came very, very, very late in the evolution.
aboyborninjune 6 months ago
Christian answer to the proven fact of evolution: "SATAN DID IT!"
aboyborninjune 6 months ago
Not all life is based on DNA. Some viruses are RNA based and prions are replicating proteins.
T0X0PHILUS 6 months ago
@T0X0PHILUS viruses are no life, prions neither.
Bonzenpunk 6 months ago in playlist say it right
@Bonzenpunk That does depend on one's definition of life. But I agree it is a point on which people disagree.
T0X0PHILUS 6 months ago
I always have that immature smirk when Homo Erectus comes up.
Alexc3217 6 months ago
For me, the best evidence against intelligent design? T-Rex arms.
biggingeryeti 6 months ago
wwwdotJoyofSatandotcom
wwwdotExposingChristianitydotcom
Learn about Satan before you speak.
GahdeMalprigi1488x 7 months ago
@GahdeMalprigi1488x Satan isn't real.
4ingP 7 months ago 8
Long Video.
Great Video.
This should be required viewing in every church in the world.
It is time mankind stopped believing the explanations of reality; fabricated by ancient people who were intellectually immature.
Evolution disproves the Book of Genesis.
Without Genesis there is no basis for any religion that believes in the God of Abraham.
No Adam and Eve, No Talking Snake, and No Original Sin.
We are not "Born into sin".
Jesus had no sin to die for!
Why would God require sacrifice?
legion1a 7 months ago 2
I keep saying this over and over and over. Just because evolution exists and its proven by science still doesn't mean God doesn't exist. I don't get where the idea that a God doesn't exist just because the bible and or religion was wrong. Its a fucking book for Gods sakes and the religion was based on what people believed but it still does NOT count out the possibility that a higher power created us originally. Besides religion is faith based. If faith was easy then it wouldn't acceptable.
Onizuma13 7 months ago
@Onizuma13 I keep saying THIS. In any culture, in any religion, in ANY time in history, there is not one SPECK of VERIFIABLE evidence for ANY god. . . E - V - E - R . . N - O - N - E ! ! ZERO. But this astonishing revelation just bounces off the bucket you wear on your head. Why would the supposed creator of every atom and every outcome not leave the religiously afflicted ONE instance of VERIFIABLE evidence to back their INSANE claims, and debunk the Athiests ? He/she/it doesn't exist ! !
evidenceonlythanx 7 months ago 2
@evidenceonlythanx Whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.
Onizuma13 7 months ago
@Onizuma13 I disagree, faith is easy for it can be indoctrinated. All you need to have faith is to fill the gap of ignorance with "god did it," instead of I don't know yet. It much easier to believe the teaching of your parents, church, community, and culture than relying on reason and logic to engage in scientific inquiries. It's even harder to forgo your beliefs once the evidences prove them to be wrong.
petion2010 6 months ago
@Onizuma13 so your saying people who claim that the bible is the true word of god and accept it as such, can still believe in god if we prove one thing wrong in the bible, why would there be something thats wrong in the bible if god is perfect? surely his words would be nothing but perfect? and with evolution we win either way, cus if we evolved from primordial ooze then theres no god, but then if u say god made the ooze, it took billions of year for us to get here not 7 days, so we win again :D
lisn92 6 months ago
@lisn92 Humans made the bible. Not God. The bible has been translated over into English and whatever other languages. Do you think the bible was the bible in Noahs time? No because for one the bible didn't exist back then and two people we're speaking a different language. The bible was translated from old religious scrolls or something. Don't quote me on that. I just know that humans rewrote it over & over. Its not like john whatever heard Gods voice and wrote the entire thing over night.
Onizuma13 6 months ago
@lisn92 So obviously (adding to what I wrote) the bible isn't perfect because God didn't write it. People did over time. Some may have been directly from God. Thats all speculation but a lot of it is just religious history. Also who's to say if its all truth? Too me its really just a huge parable and jesus christ himself spoke in parables so fuck it.
Onizuma13 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy is soooooo stupid....wow. evolutionists say how can anyone believe in something thats just solely pure faith....well...they believe the earth formed accidently 20 billion years ago...how the hell can you possibly know that? thats solely on faith also. especially to believe it all happened by chance...lllmmmmaaaaooo...omg...im dying here. one thing is apparently inherent here...STUPIDITY!!!!!!
polo1178 7 months ago
@polo1178 I'll preface this by saying that I am on your side in disagreeing with him but your argument is flawed when you consider the size of the universe. take a million coins and tell me to flip them all. Most likely they will be close to 50% heads and 50% tails bu that doesn't mean that it is impossible that they all land heads. with the amount of places in the universe, it is not a stretch to believe that something profound would occur somewhere. The age of the earth is estimated using data
RedDevilFan10 7 months ago
@polo1178 you trolling or are you really an idiot
FIGHTFANNERD3 7 months ago
@polo1178 chances are you are an idiot.
TerryStoneNL 7 months ago
WOW....willingly ignorant. do you know how amazing the human body is? we cant come anywhere near the brilliance of creating a human life. way to complex..yet, we're here. how can it be anything but god to create us? an accident? lmao...wow. chances are..none of you ppl even picked up a bible. therefore, you'll try to explain everything with your level of understanding.you do not want to retain god in your knowledge.
polo1178 7 months ago
I have got to hand it to you RabidApe, that 4 years after postiing this video is still the best 15 minute video on ERV's.
i think you explain the concept really really well.
I'm not sure the "4 mutations on average" is correct though, it seems a tad conservative, but perhaps that's on purpose..
Btw, how about a video on the Big Bang ;p
mindwis3 8 months ago
When evolutionists explain to me where the very first atom came from, then I will believe. I dont believe that something came from nothing. Everything has a source.
sunandmoon111 8 months ago
@sunandmoon111
Where matter came from doesn't have anything to do with evolution. Evolution takes place on matter. Evolution doesn't claim to have explanatory power about the formation of matter.
My understanding is that high energy gamma rays likely collided to create matter. I doubt this resolves your issues with evolution.
I wouldn't call myself an evolutionist. I'm not devoted to evolution. Evolution just seems to fit the evidence I've seen maybe a better explanation will come along.
ekpil2000 8 months ago
@sunandmoon
"when evolutionists explain to me where the very first atom came from".
I think you're asking the wrong people.
i would not trust an "evolutiionist" to answer that question, i'd turn to cosmologists ;)
"I dont believe that something came from nothing"
understandably, yet there is this thing called 'vacuum fluctuations"
'm not sure there "exists " something like "nothing" (always sounds weird :)
You could search for : A universe from nothing, by Lawrence Krauss
mindwis3 8 months ago
Well lets see if you can do better, no man has ever seen something born outside of its kind.Do you contend to know what other molecules can be used in creating life?In fact the synthetically created cells that man has made uses the same genetic code,hence this proves creation in the sense that it took intelligences to make life.
clawedification 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURN IN HELL FOREVER OR BELIEVE IN JESUS
EVOLUTION IS THE GREATEST MASTERPIECE FROM SATAN
fuckmania07 8 months ago
oh, the guy's an idiot... how can you read the Bible mot-a-mot? Who did you make the vid for? 1st graders??? waste of time...good title though...
unomnacajit111 8 months ago
darwin proved God's existence when he filled his theory with INTENTIONS of creation and change. It's like the physicists' argument - the universe can and has created itself from "nothing" but we don't know WHY. "why?" is key here... With respect to life on earth the truth is probably in the middle - creationists can explain the beginning, evolutionists the rest...
unomnacajit111 8 months ago
thumb's up for bear's humping.
isrealjason 8 months ago
I am sure that most of the dislikes are from the religious right.
connerjd 8 months ago
No one can explain the unknowable. God is invisible and remains obscure. God clothed himself in light. I will try to explain faith. All good hearted people love the message of Jesus and believe. Sometimes our faith is tested and some lose faith.
When a person comes to Jesus with a contrite heart and hears the words of love and peace it resonates with his being. God heals the broken hearted. A persons faith grows.
oldlite 8 months ago
@oldlite You want to know how easy it was for evolution to create the eye? well her you go! /watch?v=eQnMWyZ-nzA and watch the whole thing !
Carta82 8 months ago
Comment removed
oldlite 8 months ago
@oldlite please, give me some of your evidence for why evolution is false, i really want to know so i can quickly disprove you.
ibleedHALO 8 months ago
Comment removed
oldlite 8 months ago
@oldlite I am actually very glad you brought up the topic of the eye, because it has been part of the debate against evolution, mainly because some cannot fathom how such a thing could be created through mutation and adaptation. Since I don't have many words here, i will say i am not refuting any claim of yours, I respect all theories because I can learn from them, i just want to share ideas. Please message me because i want to teach and learn about both of our topics more in depth. Thanks
ibleedHALO 8 months ago
@oldlite "evolution can not explain the complexities of say the eye"
I'm no biologist but after a quick Google search I was able to find plenty of information that explains the evolution of the eye. It's complicated stuff and we're talking about hundreds of millions of years, but that's what evolution is. It sounds to me like you're unwilling to research anything that would contradict your version of "the truth".
TylerOmega 8 months ago
@TylerOmega watch this ;) /watch?v=eQnMWyZ-nzA evolution created the eye over and over again in very different ways ;)
Carta82 8 months ago
@oldlite E x a c t l y.
SicSkatez 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oldlite "evolution can not explain the complexities of say the eye"
Bullshit, not only can it explain, we pretty much have the evidence of its evolution right before our eyes. Namely the more primitive eyes of more primitive species, right down to the light sensitive skin of some platworms.
Mutation may not be evolution, but its is a vital part of it.
Hyeesa 8 months ago
I have to admit that i love when creationists bring up the eye, because if there was creation, not evolution, its actually the glaring exemple that the creator was a moron.
The receptive membrane in our eyes actually faces backwards, in our heads, while the axons of the neurons attached to them, are facing outside. This causes us to have our blind spots where these "cables" are collected into one bundle. If someone designed this, he or she must have been really stupid. All it would take...
Hyeesa 8 months ago
Comment removed
oldlite 8 months ago
@oldlite Oh whistling dixie up your anus !! now there is a evolutionary leap!!! Maybe there is no need for evolution to correct it I see just fine that would be the best reason. As far as god being stupid welll he dosent exist so his stupidity is irrelevent..
berrywoke 8 months ago
@oldlite I'm pretty sure Hyeesa is not calling evolution stupid. They are pointing out the difference in eye structure between us and octopi. And one reason for the eye to stop 'evolving' is that we have other means of compensating for that 'blind spot'. Our ears for example, if you're looking in a bush and can't see a rabbit, your ears will tell you something is there if it moves, same for the nose with odors. We can compensate in other ways, thus eliminating the need to change the eye
redwolf602 8 months ago
All it would take it to make it correctly, is to turn around the receptor membrane.
Interestingly enough it was done correctly for some animals. Namely, octopus and their relatives. They dont suffer from this problem. I mean what the hell god? He cared enough for sealife but not for the design of the human body apparently.
So you decide. Evolution? Or the god who apparently favors octopuses to you. :D
Hyeesa 8 months ago
Hyeesa
Funny, but effective point
This perfectly demonstrates the absurdity of so-called "intelligent Design." Another couple of examples which help to drive this point home is; a god giving us one tube to eat & breathe with! Thousands a year choke to death b/c of this brilliant design. The other example means much to us guys, and that is; a designer who runs our urinary tube strait thru the Prostate Gland...a sure recipe for serious trouble.
An "intelligent" designer? I think not!
Cootabux 8 months ago 8
@Cootabux Maybe He just doesn't like us. :)
SweatyShivers 6 months ago
SweatyShivers
U said; "Maybe He just doesn't like us. :)"
Funny u should mention that. After some considerable time studying scripture & early Judaism, I've come to the conclusion that you may very well be right. To get a really good insight into how much this bible war god despised man, take a serious study of the story of Job....and that's just one of the better examples. This bible god was a barbarian (just like the men who invented him), and downright evil!
Cootabux 6 months ago
@Cootabux The Hebrews were His 'favorite' though. 300 hundred years as slaves, 40 years in the desert, allowed His son to be railroaded and crucified, hated by seemingly ever other tribe, race or peoples since time began, 6,000,000 slaughtered by the Nazi's, and if all that isn't bad enough, oh yeah, cut the ends of your dicks off. Hey Yahweh, no more favors OK?
If He treats His favorites with such hatred, it's no wonder He shits on the rest of us. :)
SweatyShivers 6 months ago
@oldlite I have removed the former comment. Not all evolutionists are swine.
oldlite 8 months ago
@Benlucky13 your teachers are over paid.
oldlite 8 months ago
@Benlucky13 You are just another kid with a false sense of self worth.
oldlite 8 months ago
Comment removed
oldlite 8 months ago
Thanks for this video!
gastarbeiter1 8 months ago
Fantastic video. Well spoken, with clarity and detail. I've been watching a lot of videos that break down the processes of evolution which are often misrepresented and misunderstood by propagandists, and this is one of my favorites so far. I'm going to keep this one handy. Thanks!
bobsmeerfak 9 months ago
Similarity of DNA, genetics or diets, all support common designer. "All living creatures have the same DNA it is merely put together differently, by the same designer.".......The law of common designer.
warriorprince1010 10 months ago
Really great video. Your explanation of the dynamics of retrovirus indicating common lineage was really clear and compelling. Thanks!
torputube 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and inventing gods Haha!! love that part!
yeye12344 10 months ago
The main problem in reconstructing the origins of man is lack of fossil evidence: all there is could be displayed on a dinner table." - New Scientist 20 May 1982 pg 491.
"Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various interpretations. Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is absent altogether". (Henry Gee, Nature vol. 412 p. 131, 2001).What did he say? "extensive fossil records?he lies,
xtiml 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xtiml "The main problem in reconstructing the origins of man is lack of fossil evidence: all there is could be displayed on a dinner table." - New Scientist 20 May 1982 pg 491"
Not only is this a 30 year old quote (30 years of additional hominid fossil collection), but isn't accurate. That would have to be one VERY large dinner table. :)
blaisingm 11 months ago
recent evidence for an out of place red shift presented by Halton Arp recently in the Astrophysical Journal (10 February 2005). Arp and fellows have found a quasar with an extreme red shift of z = 2.114 embedded within galaxy NGC 7319 with a red shift of only z = 0.022. The reason they believe the galaxy and quasar are connected is because of observed gaseous interaction between the two. Evidence such as this strongly suggests that red shift has nothing to do with distance, nor expansion.
xtiml 11 months ago
"It can be stressed , however, that discordant red shifts are not discovered in just one or two cases that have no relation . in all cases we test - large clusters, groups, companions to nearby galaxies, companions to middle distance galaxies, companions linked by luminous filaments, galaxies interacting gravitationally, chains of galaxies - in every conceivable case, we come out with the same answer: the same discordant red shifts for the same general class of younger, fainter galaxies"
xtiml 11 months ago
quantity of energy in the Universe is constant. Thus, the cosmic egg could not come into being from nothing. . According to the Big Bang theory, asked to believe that all this energy came into being from nothing!Explosions are anything but accurate! "Explosions throw matter out, the Big Bang mysteriously produced the opposite , with matter clumping in galaxies Another problem is that a explosion has led to a ordered system of galaxies systems near perfect back ground radiation
xtiml 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xtiml "asked to believe that all this energy came into being from nothing!"
You agreed with my previous statement..."very true.thank you." If you do agree, then you know that nobody is asking to to believe in anything. Science is a tool used to solve problems. You don't believe in science, you use it to solve problems. I suppose you could believe in your hammer if you like, but a hammer won't do anything until you use it.
blaisingm 11 months ago
In fact, in an unchanging environment, stabilizing selection would tend to keep an organism largely unchanged. if we are to believe that life began in the primordial broth as single celled organisms such as bacteria, then why are fossilised examples of bacteria such as cyanobacteria identical to living cyanobacteria today? If the environment for all these organism was such that they did not need to change, where was the environment that caused all the changes?
xtiml 11 months ago
I have been exposed to these professorsI accepted evolution with out much examination and then i got outside uni and recently available free info not taught in schoolsturns it all upside down,history anthropology(not regarded as hard science by the way..I know what they are from all the info they left out(on purpose)to instill a desired mind direction.still question remains,radiation had beneficial mutation? name one...
xtiml 11 months ago
It is significant that, according to evolutionists, no fossils of chimpanzee have ever been found. Some have suggested that fossil chimpanzees and other primates actually have been found but they were interpreted as human ancestors rather than as fossil primates.The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change ...... All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions are abrupt.
xtiml 11 months ago
Fail, all life is based on matter, and this is energy. Without it no carbon based life could exist. Even if evolution is true it is not the beginning.
You need to be looking at when the Earth was without form and void to be anywhere near the beginning of life.
Even if we do come from chimps, correct me if I am wrong but the beast/animals was created before we were according to the bible, and before those came the fish and the plants etc. . Sound familiar?
TCupUK 11 months ago
OH MY GOD U LEGEND I LOVED UR BIT " SHOW ME THE FOSSIL OF JUDUS" Halarious m8 i genuinely laughed out loud well done m8 , i'm studying evolutionary biology at university and i'm so sharing this . thanks man u made evolution funny. go on son
Brainiac659 11 months ago
It is important to understand that their is a BIG, BIG difference between science and religious belief systems. Science is a tool used to solve problems. Religious belief systems are things you believe in. You don't believe in science. Instead, you use it to solve problems just like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems. Science and religious belief systems are completely unrelated and unfit for comparison.
blaisingm 11 months ago
@blaisingm Science has a history of being proven wrong. It is not infallible.
TCupUK 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TCupUK "Science has a history of being proven wrong. It is not infallible."
Failure is one of sciences virtues. Science isn't "truth"; rather, it is a tool used to solve problems. It's wrong all the time. Each time it is wrong, something new is learned which strengths it.
blaisingm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TCupUK "Science has a history of being proven wrong. It is not infallible."
Failure is one of sciences virtues. Science isn't "truth"; rather, it is a tool used to solve problems. It's wrong all the time. Each time it is wrong, something new is learned which strengths it.
blaisingm 11 months ago
@blaisingm very true.thank you.
xtiml 11 months ago
@xtiml "very true.thank you."
No problem! Unfortunately, many people confuse science with a religious belief system. They are inclined to "believe" in useful scientific models, theories, principles and laws. Chemists don't "believe" in atomic theory, they use it to solve problems... and they do it all the time. Vaccines don't make themselves... instead APPLICATION of the evolutionary model is what improves vaccines. NOT belief.
blaisingm 11 months ago
apparently 397 people so far have been ignorant and closed minded for another 15 minutes and 28 seconds. lol i laugh at them
itwaslogan 11 months ago
This video was 4 years ago, and some things he states is now invalid. We just don't have all the answers, and can only speak of what is proven at the time...which can change the next day. That's the only thing that irks me...Freaking egomaniacs. One thing I know for sure, is that Science and Spirituality HAS to work together, or we'll blow ourselves up because of EGO. There's evidence we HAVE destroyed ourselves before, possibly 3 times, & had to start over from nothing. I believe it.
Fesheca 11 months ago
Ok, so if the viral dna has to have a living cell to inject into....where did the living cell come from? I'm talking about original creation...the chances of viruses finding themselves pure living cells to start growing is way too far out. I thought it was bacteria however...not viruses. What about the Flagella? These organisms are described by some scientists as being gears and motors, like a boat motor. Some might call this of God, but I call it an intelligence we don't quite understand.
Fesheca 11 months ago
the priets of science can be just as dogmatic and dishonest as any other human and they are.if you dopnt go along with the line you aint going anywhere.read about the woamn digging in mexico who found way out of palce stuff and she insisted on presenting they took her tenure and flushed her down the toilet.if it upsets their rice bowl they bury it dent it or discredit it.such ascomets aint ice and rock bslls jamming around and the sun isnt a giant nuclear reactor,it is smug to think all is known
xtiml 11 months ago
Not to be a boring nitpick, but that's Virii. One virus, several virii. ;)
ShyTooShy 11 months ago
insects have much of the same dna as humans,he says there are numerous fossills demonstrating evolution from so called lower human forms.when in fact it is very scarce and dubious at best.Lies of ommission are common. many scientits dont believe in evolution and there is not much proof and never has it been demonstrated beyond doubt that a lower animal changed into a higer animal ,he leaps of logic as chimps and hunmans cmmon ancestor ,reasonable accuracy? he is pure speculation and bad ones.
xtiml 11 months ago
insects have much of the same dna as humans,he says there are numerous fossills demonstrating evolution from so called lower human forms.when in fact it is very scarce and dubious at best.Lies of ommission are common. many scientits dont believe in evolution and there is not much proof and never has it been demonstrated beyond doubt that a lower animal changed into a higer animal ,he leaps of logic as chimps and hunmans cmmon ancestor ,reasonable accuracy he is pure speculation and bad ones.
xtiml 11 months ago
it's sad that people prefer ancient books over new found modern knowledge that is highly accurate.
Requiemxtoxinnocence 11 months ago
I love that the "designer" is the Monty Python god.
kartorus 11 months ago
this guy is a liar
xtiml 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xtiml - "this guy is a liar"
Would you please show me where he lied. I assume that you have peer-reviewed, empirical evidence for your claim.
What! You don't! Well, that is surprising.
CamW30 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xtiml - "this guy is a liar"
Would you please show me where he lied. I assume that you have peer-reviewed, empirical evidence for your claim.
What! You don't! Well, that is surprising.
CamW30 1 year ago
@xtiml You aver that "this guy is a liar."
You mean the host of the video, RabidApe? List the lies he's told. Otherwise, "Halt's Maul!"
Xenophile665 11 months ago
@Xenophile665 radiation has NEVER made a beneficial mutation for animals,name one if so.evolution is a religion requiring faith in liars and puffy professors in their ivy halls of the mis educatuion system.they need these long time sopans to splain the oh so gradual and quite remarkable changes, do you believe in shapeshifting? what about all the massive boneyards all over the earth?and no i dont think earth is 10 thou years old but mayhaps the grand canyon was formed quickly not in eons
xtiml 11 months ago
@xtiml Asserting that "evolution is a religion requiring faith in liars" is a logical fallacy. The available evidence supports evolution.
Biologists don't "need these long time spans." Radiometric evidence supports them. No evidence suggests otherwise.
What do "shapeshifting" and "massive boneyards" have to do with this discussion?
"MAYHAP the grand canyon was formed quickly not in eons?" The only "evidence" to support this is baseless assumption claimed by an actual liar, Kent Hovind.
Xenophile665 11 months ago
fossilized huamns footprints in same fossils as dinosaurs,shapeshifting is akin to species change and the boneyards have everykind of animal in them from fuish to dinasaurs to everything that was alive including animals not supposed to be together alive at the time. you believe himans have only been around 40 50 thousdand years?what about pottery and obviously man made items found deep in coal mines, and dinasaurs drawn on pottery ,and cave drawings of humans that look like cartoon portraits?
xtiml 11 months ago
@xtiml What is "huamns?" What is "fuish?" What is "himans?" What is "thousdand?" Please learn to spell and proofread before posting.
Now, back to the topic: Can you answer the question I posed earlier? What do "shapeshifting" and "massive boneyards" have to do with this discussion?
Xenophile665 11 months ago
@Xenophile665
You ever seen someone try to explain Chess to a four-year-old?
xtiml is clearly either uneducated, unable to think, or both. You aren't going to make any progress with him, I'm afraid. He's got his mind so filled with nonsense that he's practically immune to reason, rational thought. "The priests of science can be just as dogmatic..." He's clearly never even tried to understand science, he just parrots what he's been told to believe... and that's good enough for him it seems.
Boy75402 11 months ago
@xtiml BTW, stating that "evolution is a religion" is flawed logic. There is no dogma in science, unlike religion. Science is based on evidence, not faith. If a scientist has evidence that supports a view that conflicts with previous hypotheses, then it is accepted by the scientific community.
Honest scientists look for evidence. Dishonest "scientists" declare their hypotheses as truth (dogmatic inference). Men such as Hovind, Hamm, Behe and Gish are examples of dishonest "scientists."
Xenophile665 11 months ago
@Xenophile665 comets are not balls of ice and rocks,the sun is not a giant nuclear reactor,the red shift is for expanding univere is flawed as to be unreliable,exploding universe is not a fact,do you believe in magic?were you taught truth and nothing but the truth in your education?lol.
xtiml 11 months ago
@xtiml Comets are composed of ice and rocks. The sun is a nuclear reactor. The red shift does clarify the theory of an expanding universe. All of this is based on evidence. Your assertions, lacking evidence, are based on your opinion, which is irrelevant.
No, I don't believe in magic. No, I was taught falsehoods along with truths in my education. Most of the falsehoods stemmed from early religious upbringing.
Xenophile665 11 months ago
Great video! But why the name? Tricking creationists into watching this?
python1996 1 year ago
This just proves that noah and the ark is true. Thanks for increasing my faith!
deathknight228 1 year ago
Sadly Creationists will have stopped listening to this video about 2 seconds in. They decisively and willfully reject actually knowledge in favor of fairy tales.
xephyr1000 1 year ago
Religion aside, here is a question i hope you can answer. Evolution theory says that we evolved from Apes. But what if it was the opposite, what if Apes evolved from humans. Once it was thought that dodos evolved into pigeons, but later it was found that pigeons was the ones that evolved into dodos.We like to think we are supremo with our intelligent. But in the world of mother nature, a hand to hand battle, An ape would win a battle, as they are stronger and better climbers than us
JaynalM 1 year ago
@JaynalM
We had a common ape ancestor BOTH chimps and us but we parted ways and survived BOTH in our new respective environment. Evolution has no goal, in a billion years the most intelligent creaturer on earth will look nothing like we do today. We're just a snapshot.
Pigeons did not evolve INTO anything. They changed over time to not only dodos but a lot of other birds as well..
If we move to a valley where there are no strong competition we'll survive. No need for battles ...
aNdYmAtTeR 1 year ago
@JaynalM You might add smarter too.
oldlite 8 months ago
The "god" is just illusion in brain of the lost soul!!! If the god made us, do ju really think that he need to write down how to live, in some farytales book like bible or koran?!? Much easyer to him will be that he implant this into our brains, dont u think that! If we have a car, we dont need to hike!
But anyway bible is a nice farytale of old storis, who made dragon of a lizard, and a giant from the warior!
jcage001 1 year ago
@jcage001 U Suck
glbrt711 11 months ago
Comment removed
jcage001 1 year ago
This is like blowing up a junkyard and it all lands in one place as a 1920 Ford model A.Can you tell me why the # of chromosomes are randomly scattered thruoghout species?It doesn't follow a pattern according to how intellegent a creature is. Humans 46,etc.This is why dogs and cats could never haveoffspring. Fact is that the fossil record is vast and yet not one half this or half that exists.All your quotes of neandrethals etc. were exposed as frauds by the scientific community of their day.
dragonloses 1 year ago
@dragonloses I'm no pro but if you look at developing young inside any mammal. And many other animals too, You will see that a the early stages of dolphin, elephant, human cats, dogs etc start from a similar stage. Also note how humans have tails then loose them during development.
stufaman 1 year ago
@dragonloses Evolution never says that an organism will be half cat and half dog this isnt fucking pokemon where things simply change abruptly. And its not like your ridiculous metaphor. Evolution doesnt have a goal. THe 1920 ford model would need a goal in mind. The thing is, evolution has been witnessed it is demontrably true. How else would you explain how bacteria become immune to vaccinations.
asdfbobbyasdf 1 year ago
@asdfbobbyasdf Bacteria adapting to be drug resistant is a far cry from proving evolution..Used to be an atheist and evolutionist myself.Why isn't the fossil record full of transistional animals?Lies are still in school and college textbooks.Look into my comment about the dna structure and the # of Chromosones.They are staggered without rhyme or reason,if it was proof of evolution it would follow a pattern according to known laws.Life breaks down and makes things simpler,water flows downhill,etc
dragonloses 1 year ago
@dragonloses See i don't know that answer, but im sure if you ask a BIOLOGIST they could give you a REAL answer. And the fossil record is full of transitional forms. There are videos dedicated on this sight to nothing BUT transitional forms that we know of. Of course it isn't going to be perfect since EVERY GENERATION IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM. No matter how trans fossils are found, Creatards are always going to ask for the inbetween steps. To say there are no trans. forms is a profound lie.
asdfbobbyasdf 1 year ago
@dragonloses
You may have believed in evolution at one time, but it's pretty obvious that you never really understood it.
ClumsyRoot 1 year ago
WHY ON EARTH would a video explaining how dna works would have 400 dislikes?
is science an enemy of mankind?
Samura1gamer 1 year ago 32
@Samura1gamer Because you are not supposed to think. So, let's see, that would be 400 members of the television worshipping crowd. Show them this on Television and they would be an absolutely captive, hypnotized audience. Why do you suppose that is?
528htz 1 year ago
@Samura1gamer no but this guy mocks and rejects God's existence! by using science human logic! God created time he exists out of time!
isurfu2ube 1 year ago
@isurfu2ube yes maybe he does reject the biblical god's existence.whats the difference between u and him? u reject thousands of religions and tens of thousands of gods already. he happens to reject one more and he bases that to his logic. do u have any other instrument in ur disposal beyond human logic?
Samura1gamer 1 year ago 16
@Samura1gamer Yes mad scientists arel destroying this world.
oldlite 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Samura1gamer Yes mad scientists are destroying this world.
oldlite 8 months ago
@Samura1gamer Because a lot of people enjoy bearing false witness, when they say they believe in a literal translation of the Bible. As in Adam and Eve didn't just have two boys, and the boys married girls. One of the girls being from land of Nod... which is the literal part of the Bible you can stick all of evolution and the age of the universe into. Instead, they think that they did have girls too, but someone forgot to write it down, and that the whole "from the land of Nod" thing was a typo.
greedyfoot 1 year ago
@greedyfoot u can stick all the evolution science in the bible just because it says "there was a girl in the land of nod" ? there are more things to it than just the mysterious whereabouts of someone's wife.
Nothing that is said in the bible corresponds to scientific findings.absolutely nothing. It's hard to imagine why would god deliberately sends us looking in the opposite direction.
Samura1gamer 1 year ago
@Samura1gamer Maybe people don't like those subtitles. lol
Koich14 11 months ago
@Samura1gamer Not science for me, maybe for some people our own frontal lobes are the enemy, for me its the reptilian voice within me and all its superstition and fear it can bring.
musicalentities 11 months ago
@Samura1gamer I would say science is the enemy of stupidity. :P
Davidbasque15 11 months ago
@Samura1gamer I suspect it's because after almost 15 minutes of explanation he decides to antagonize by making fun of religion. As a result, all he's done up to that point goes out the window, and those Christians who were fence sitters and who might have been convinced by the evidence and arguments he's given just tune him out as another enemy of Christianity. They are pushed in the direction of Creationism, not away from it. Pity, because the rest of the video is good.
Naiant 11 months ago
@Naiant u r probably right.when i wrote that comment i hadn't finished watching the video. still,a christian watching a science video knows in advance that a "QUICK,CHANGE THE CHANNEL" moment coming when science crosses roads with religion and that is the real pity
Samura1gamer 11 months ago
@Samura1gamer According to this video some human baby had a chimp for a mother. And that baby went off to produce people as we know it now. get out of here.
oldlite 8 months ago
@oldlite take my advice;open up a book (not the bible) about evolution and notice how u will not find a statement like that in it. or do something easier and download some documentaries from torrents "pbs nova becoming human" recommended
no human was born from monkeys.everything is a transitional being between their ancestor and their descendant.today's animals werent present 100 mil years ago nor will they be 100m years after.u are a transitional being between Homo heidelbergensis and the next
Samura1gamer 8 months ago
@Samura1gamer there are people who like living in the darkness!
flightkiller09 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Baby steps to Christianity is Atheism! Because they work sooooooooo hard to disprove Christianity and its their favorite subject? Why might you say? I guess its that curiosity that God put into human brains to find out what really going on and who created us why are we created and who is the creator?
So thanks for taking a leap of faith in your Creator your making the right decision!
Most Atheists become believers because they come to the point they cannot rebel against the shocking facts!!
isurfu2ube 1 year ago
@isurfu2ube Hahah how ridiculous are you?! Go study comparitive religion and then you might have something worth contributing. Have a nice day.
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
Yeah God made it work that way duh!!
isurfu2ube 1 year ago
Yeah and God created all that that you said!!
isurfu2ube 1 year ago
@isurfu2ube who created 'god' then?
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
Comment removed
isurfu2ube 1 year ago
@MindfulFuture Just a thought. The only way 'God' can control all is to BE all. Basically God IS the actual universe. And let's be honest, even God has to obey rules of science. So if God is consists of every molecule in exsistance. It probably explains why God doesn't care if he drops a church roof on more of 'himself'.
Well that's what a funny Red dude with pointy horns told me.
stufaman 1 year ago
@stufaman thanks, I'm not looking for psuedo-scientific answers, it was a rhetorical question thrown at a believer who talks more than he thinks.
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
@MindfulFuture Oh sorry. I'd say we created God. I mean we invented the letter 'G' so...
stufaman 1 year ago
@stufaman I agree. My point was, unexplained 'creation' by a deity itself requires an explanation. It's an ever regressing tautology otherwise..'..god did it..'
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
Wonderfully informative with use of clear language and descriptions so that even the average joe (like me ^^) can understand it. Thank you brilliant video
Teristar1 1 year ago
is anyone else getting the feeling like the text and pictures are all moving around after watching that vid?
Nice vid, thanks.
kendrawhisp 1 year ago
thanks... fantastic video.
oneki 1 year ago
lol at 3:00 bears really like it doggy style phnarrf phnarrf! ...which is interesting given their genetic relationship to dogs... other than that... excellent video... 5 stars... 6 if they were available....and subscribed...
You are an excellent communicator. so drop the ticker... or if its for the hard of hearing...then please make it a little smaller.
MumblingMickey 1 year ago
Brilliant video
joshie92 1 year ago
seriously pointless video.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
first of all how is genetic evidence planted by a thing that cannot be detected? god and satan cannot be dected in our physical reality because it dosent exist. wake up and apply some critical thinking. just because someting happens that you do not or cannot understand dosent mean an enitity like god or satan did it. thats like saying god makes it rain when you do not know meterology.
MrJackclarke 1 year ago
Is this video suppose to show evidence of Darwinist evolution? If it was, then it's a fail! So our DNA is related to bananas...Yeah, so? God created all creatures & plants from the same source. Tell us something we don't already know!
potjhm1 1 year ago