2 failures out of well over 100 launches is an extraordinary statistic for spaceflight. Everything about space is hostile, from the vacuum to radiation to debris, and getting there and back is all but a miracle of science. The shuttle has also had a number of incidents that were disruptive, but not fatal, which demonstrates the the relative toughness of its systems.
Remember that the Apollo program had one (nearly two) fatal flights after just 17 missions.
@DrDontDoDis Compare with the Russian Soyuz, 2 fatal flights on 112 missions since 1967 and still used today. By far the most reliable spacecraft built.
@helljumpr5150 Umm... the space shuttle had 135 flights with two fatal. That's at least as reliable. Soyuz rockets also failed on two occasions, both of which required aborts, one of which seriously injured the crew. And the Soyuz were the least problematic craft the Soviets had, other rockets killed hundreds of technicians. It was safer to fly a Soviet rocket than it was to fuel one!
It should of exploded just off the launch pad from that O ring deal, but because Challenger was such a tough shuttle, it took a combo of events to finally destroy it. That turbulence they hit at throttle up was the last cause event. The old man that knew was powerless to stop the launch. Maybe he should of tried chaining himself to some part of the launch pad. That might of delayed launch, while they took him into custody.
"Nine trouble-free flights" isn't really true. On Challenger's eighth mission, one of its main engines failed during ascent and it had to enter a lower orbit than planned.
I know some people are blind to this fact, so just to bring it their attention, Christa was not the only person on that shuttle, there were 6 others up there. I mean, I might not be very NASA knowledgable, but last time I checked a school teacher doesnt know how to operate a space shuttle. R.I.P to ALL who died that day.
The problem was both Columbia and Challenger had engineer's in NASA warning of serious problems, and rather listen, upper management decided, hey everythings fine. So the so called "Smart" engineers we have hired and pay very well, we're not going to listen to them, and instead take a chance. We still would be 130 for 130 had someone inside NASA listened and done something. Afternoon launch for Challenger and spacewalk for Columbia, but I know this is all hindsight the easiest sight of all...
The problem was both Columbia and Challenger had engineer's in NASA warning of serious problems, and rather listen, upper management decided, hey everythings fine. So the so called "Smart" engineers we have hired and pay very well, we're not going to listen to them, and instead take a chance. We still would be 130 for 130 had someone inside NASA listened and done something.
The astronauts had time to switch from the shuttles oxygen supply to their independent space suit supply which means their deaths weren't quick and they survived the initial explosion at least for a few seconds.
The astronauts had time to swithc from the shuttles oxygen supply to their independant space suit supply which means their deaths weren't quick and they survived the initial explosion at least for a few seconds.
I feel so sad for people on the challenger!!! I heard that they didn't die from the explosion, it was from the impact from hitting the water, but it might not be true.
Ignoring the warnings and red flags before this disaster is just one of the many reasons NASA needs to be shut down....and the ones that ignored the warnings should be tried for 7 counts of murder.
I can watch footage of the 9/11 attacks (and I actually SAW that happening from across the river in NY), I can watch the footage of the Columbia breakup, I can watch almost anything... but this Challenger footage still cuts into me like a knife, 25 years later. :(
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Typical scrap US design. It is a miracle no people have died if you look with what kind of scrap they fly into space. The problem was the US could not steal the technology from other country's this time, that's why the design was so bad this time.
@bildtker76 All due respect to the deceased crew, but this 'scrap' you refer to has 2 operational failures for 130 successful flights.
NASA admittedly made some bad calls, but spaceflight is a constant gamble. Unless you design your own more successful orbital vehicle, I'll enjoy smirking at your irrelevant and ignorant comment.
@tko741 I know NASA doesn't make crap, but 2 failures is pretty bad. Especially considering we only have built 5 shuttles (enterprise was used only for testing) and 2 of them were destroyed. Soyuz is cheaper and far more reliable.
That's one crash every 65 flights. A failure rate that high in any other machine or device would be considered a total calamity, especially if each failure resulted in several deaths. Few would purchase a car, for example, if that resulted in a deadly crash after only a few weeks (±30 round trips to work or the store).
@tko741 In other words, the space shuttle could be built with the highest technology and equipped with state of the art safety equipment, but there's always going to be a risk going up into space.
As opposed to the flawless space shuttles produced in the Netherlands, right? Oh wait, thats right, your country hasn't done shit for space exploration compared to the US, LOL.
Bit of an unfair comparison me thinks given the difference in size, population and spending power between the Netherlands and USA. It would be like asking Massachusetts to run and fund all of NASA. The Dutch do contribute to ESA and a lot of satelites, probes and instruments have been built there. Not quite up there with NASA I know but more than people think. Thing is the Dutch don't shout about everything they've done.
Not much to shout about, lol. And pardon us for thinking that orbiting the earth, getting the first man on the moon and exploring space is "something to shout about." How rude of us.
Yes very rude LOL ;). Just sticking up for the little country. Seriously though I wish ESA, the Russians etc would invest as much as NASA in space. Everything happens so slowly. I hope I'm still around when when they land on Mars.
poor design on part of the americans, the russians launch rockets from sub-zero temperatures because their rockets are designed to operate in such environments. It's hard to believe the americans never designed the shuttle to fly in cold temperatures.
That Boisjoly guy was honest, responsible and caring man, he did everything possible to stop this disaster, but there was nothing he could do against mighty beast called “nasa administration”
what is the name of the engineer for Morton-Thiokol, is it Ronger.....(last name???)
he has to be one of the best Rocket engineer at the time to know the risks of the effects of the cold weather on the shuttle O rings, and be 100% correct. To bad Nasa didnt listen to him.
what is the name of the engineer for Morton-Thiokol, is it Tom.....(last name???)
he has to be one of the best Rocket engineer at the time to know the risks of the effects of the cold weather on the shuttle O rings, and be 100% correct. To bad Nasa didnt listen to him.
00:40, the way the narrator says 'millions of television viewers' sounds so creepy, like as if it was his evil plan lol
before the challenger and columbia disasters, everybody knew what was happening. but the astronauts didn't and the press didn't, and thats all that mattered, they just crossed their fingers. come to find out that nasa could have sent up atlantis to the columbia shuttle to rescue them in plenty of time, but would you risk another several astronauts lives to save the others?
The subtlety in pronunciation leads to the rampant misuse of this phrase; however “would of” is never correct and may make you appear as if you are not educated and stupid - which you probably are.
@eltonfan30 Am i reall the one who is stupid, you care about my grammar and im the stupid one.. find something real to talk about n go cry to mommy about it..
What a total sadistic TWAT!...get.a.fuckingggg...life!
how much attension do you have to pay to somones comment,to notice that,and then feel you need to comment about a mispelt comment...what a full scale nob you are.
NASA is pathetic i mean they knew all of this and still let it fly what a lack of pure safety concern so lazy.
biggary2485 3 months ago
NASA managers were warned, but decided to risk the astronaut's lives without telling them.
Thats pretty close to murder
betamale3 3 months ago
I had a test that day and there were tons of people around the television. I wouldn't have been able to concentrate that day.
I wondered for years if the people were ever found.
Still find it sickening the camera focused on Christa MacAuliffe's parents as they realized their daughter was gone. It was a sickenenly crass moment
garycalgary 4 months ago in playlist Seconds From disaster
2 failures out of well over 100 launches is an extraordinary statistic for spaceflight. Everything about space is hostile, from the vacuum to radiation to debris, and getting there and back is all but a miracle of science. The shuttle has also had a number of incidents that were disruptive, but not fatal, which demonstrates the the relative toughness of its systems.
Remember that the Apollo program had one (nearly two) fatal flights after just 17 missions.
DrDontDoDis 4 months ago
@DrDontDoDis Compare with the Russian Soyuz, 2 fatal flights on 112 missions since 1967 and still used today. By far the most reliable spacecraft built.
helljumpr5150 2 months ago
@helljumpr5150 Umm... the space shuttle had 135 flights with two fatal. That's at least as reliable. Soyuz rockets also failed on two occasions, both of which required aborts, one of which seriously injured the crew. And the Soyuz were the least problematic craft the Soviets had, other rockets killed hundreds of technicians. It was safer to fly a Soviet rocket than it was to fuel one!
DrDontDoDis 2 months ago
LOW FPS ...
Mrmephostophilis 5 months ago
does anyone know the music playing from 3:05 to 3:52??
chikowen 5 months ago
It should of exploded just off the launch pad from that O ring deal, but because Challenger was such a tough shuttle, it took a combo of events to finally destroy it. That turbulence they hit at throttle up was the last cause event. The old man that knew was powerless to stop the launch. Maybe he should of tried chaining himself to some part of the launch pad. That might of delayed launch, while they took him into custody.
Boogyman4050 6 months ago
"Nine trouble-free flights" isn't really true. On Challenger's eighth mission, one of its main engines failed during ascent and it had to enter a lower orbit than planned.
Squamata2468 6 months ago
nasa is changes
golfgirl778 6 months ago
I was 7 years old, a day before my 8th b-day, watched this on T.V and could not believe it happened, very sad.
mjwible27 7 months ago
Should have listen to that man.
callofdutywawcj1 9 months ago
I know some people are blind to this fact, so just to bring it their attention, Christa was not the only person on that shuttle, there were 6 others up there. I mean, I might not be very NASA knowledgable, but last time I checked a school teacher doesnt know how to operate a space shuttle. R.I.P to ALL who died that day.
pattisgirls 9 months ago
It's like when Peter griffin ordered the soup but wanted the salad but it was too late...
jdelgado360 9 months ago
shoulda listened to the old guy smh!
neerredd 9 months ago
Those astronauts were still alive when they hit the water
hhluvzmagik 9 months ago
@hhluvzmagik Yeah, that is scary knowning that they were alive when they were falling towards earth.
GravityKaguya 8 months ago
i guess the negative comments here were russians
radlert4DF 10 months ago 6
hell ya man
1997girlygurl1997 9 months ago
So "long" ago but I still remember those pictures on TV back then, when I was a kid ... may they rest in peace :-(
inachinch 10 months ago
0:31. anyone notice something leaking. like fuel.
400sean 10 months ago
wasnt it a water pipe that burst or something like that that made all the ice on the pad?
TheWittumator 10 months ago
The problem was both Columbia and Challenger had engineer's in NASA warning of serious problems, and rather listen, upper management decided, hey everythings fine. So the so called "Smart" engineers we have hired and pay very well, we're not going to listen to them, and instead take a chance. We still would be 130 for 130 had someone inside NASA listened and done something. Afternoon launch for Challenger and spacewalk for Columbia, but I know this is all hindsight the easiest sight of all...
jnhinman1 10 months ago
The problem was both Columbia and Challenger had engineer's in NASA warning of serious problems, and rather listen, upper management decided, hey everythings fine. So the so called "Smart" engineers we have hired and pay very well, we're not going to listen to them, and instead take a chance. We still would be 130 for 130 had someone inside NASA listened and done something.
jnhinman1 10 months ago
The astronauts had time to switch from the shuttles oxygen supply to their independent space suit supply which means their deaths weren't quick and they survived the initial explosion at least for a few seconds.
IIIIandrew 10 months ago
The astronauts had time to swithc from the shuttles oxygen supply to their independant space suit supply which means their deaths weren't quick and they survived the initial explosion at least for a few seconds.
IIIIandrew 10 months ago
no one cares about the russian space adveture thou :/
arongutten9107 11 months ago
this is so sad.. R.I.P to those who died that day.
KSKSKS03 11 months ago
I feel so sad for people on the challenger!!! I heard that they didn't die from the explosion, it was from the impact from hitting the water, but it might not be true.
horselover8997 1 year ago
It was too cold that morning!
babylad 1 year ago
Ignoring the warnings and red flags before this disaster is just one of the many reasons NASA needs to be shut down....and the ones that ignored the warnings should be tried for 7 counts of murder.
pittman6786 1 year ago
@pittman6786 I agree, or at least manslaughter.
I can watch footage of the 9/11 attacks (and I actually SAW that happening from across the river in NY), I can watch the footage of the Columbia breakup, I can watch almost anything... but this Challenger footage still cuts into me like a knife, 25 years later. :(
jjobie 11 months ago
@pittman6786 Yes go ahead and shut NASA down. Then the crew really would have died in vain. Idiot.
bubblinbrownsugar616 10 months ago
how sad!! Gotta feel bad for the families
LOLMAN22 1 year ago
25 years ago from today.
sideslide23 1 year ago 8
dick scooby
solsisod 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Typical scrap US design. It is a miracle no people have died if you look with what kind of scrap they fly into space. The problem was the US could not steal the technology from other country's this time, that's why the design was so bad this time.
bildtker76 1 year ago
@bildtker76 All due respect to the deceased crew, but this 'scrap' you refer to has 2 operational failures for 130 successful flights.
NASA admittedly made some bad calls, but spaceflight is a constant gamble. Unless you design your own more successful orbital vehicle, I'll enjoy smirking at your irrelevant and ignorant comment.
tko741 1 year ago 31
@tko741 I'd say they fucked up.
newmanbeatbox 1 year ago
@tko741 "NASA admittedly made some bad calls"? I'd say they fucked up.
newmanbeatbox 1 year ago
@tko741 It's even a bigger gamble when there were obvious red flags that were ignored
tittyj2020 1 year ago
@tko741 and 2 in 130 is not safe at all. It is awful.
DLPBurke 1 year ago
@tko741 I know NASA doesn't make crap, but 2 failures is pretty bad. Especially considering we only have built 5 shuttles (enterprise was used only for testing) and 2 of them were destroyed. Soyuz is cheaper and far more reliable.
mgibbs88 1 year ago
@tko741 Thank you for taking the idiot to school. Sick of these stupid idiots who don't think before they type.
bubblinbrownsugar616 10 months ago
@tko741
That's one crash every 65 flights. A failure rate that high in any other machine or device would be considered a total calamity, especially if each failure resulted in several deaths. Few would purchase a car, for example, if that resulted in a deadly crash after only a few weeks (±30 round trips to work or the store).
stewartx5 9 months ago 2
@tko741 2 in 130 is a bad odd. Very bad.
DLPBurke 7 months ago
@tko741 Especially when nasa puts money before safety. It has done that twice.
DLPBurke 7 months ago
@tko741 In other words, the space shuttle could be built with the highest technology and equipped with state of the art safety equipment, but there's always going to be a risk going up into space.
scorpianofthesun 4 months ago
@bildtker76
As opposed to the flawless space shuttles produced in the Netherlands, right? Oh wait, thats right, your country hasn't done shit for space exploration compared to the US, LOL.
loner1878 1 year ago
@loner1878
Bit of an unfair comparison me thinks given the difference in size, population and spending power between the Netherlands and USA. It would be like asking Massachusetts to run and fund all of NASA. The Dutch do contribute to ESA and a lot of satelites, probes and instruments have been built there. Not quite up there with NASA I know but more than people think. Thing is the Dutch don't shout about everything they've done.
sidoney101 1 year ago
@sidoney101
Not much to shout about, lol. And pardon us for thinking that orbiting the earth, getting the first man on the moon and exploring space is "something to shout about." How rude of us.
loner1878 1 year ago
@loner1878
Yes very rude LOL ;). Just sticking up for the little country. Seriously though I wish ESA, the Russians etc would invest as much as NASA in space. Everything happens so slowly. I hope I'm still around when when they land on Mars.
sidoney101 1 year ago
poor design on part of the americans, the russians launch rockets from sub-zero temperatures because their rockets are designed to operate in such environments. It's hard to believe the americans never designed the shuttle to fly in cold temperatures.
bombarderoazul 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dick and june hehehehe
griffy1988 1 year ago
dick hehehehe
griffy1988 1 year ago
By the way, you would think they are launching from Siberia, I didn't know it gets so cold down in Florida. I am not from states so I don't know.
TheLadyG32 1 year ago
@TheLadyG32 usually it doesnt.....
antiKWM 1 year ago
That Boisjoly guy was honest, responsible and caring man, he did everything possible to stop this disaster, but there was nothing he could do against mighty beast called “nasa administration”
TheLadyG32 1 year ago
Comment removed
quadcatfly 1 year ago
@quadcatfly Watch your mouth you racist bitch.......This country has move past those times
TnsuTuba13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is the name of the engineer for Morton-Thiokol, is it Ronger.....(last name???)
he has to be one of the best Rocket engineer at the time to know the risks of the effects of the cold weather on the shuttle O rings, and be 100% correct. To bad Nasa didnt listen to him.
tealmarlin 1 year ago
what is the name of the engineer for Morton-Thiokol, is it Tom.....(last name???)
he has to be one of the best Rocket engineer at the time to know the risks of the effects of the cold weather on the shuttle O rings, and be 100% correct. To bad Nasa didnt listen to him.
tealmarlin 1 year ago
that man was right
jmsschooner 1 year ago
8:25 "The NASA can't do no wrong"... Well it clearly seems they can. NASA are also people that might fuck up. Sad but true.
Lancer2884 1 year ago
These helmets look like motorbike helmets, not astronauts helmets!
grosquipue 1 year ago
my moms school when she wa a kid she wachs all thes shuttls go.
but thay stopt doing that cuz of thes.
mattstorm360 1 year ago
00:40, the way the narrator says 'millions of television viewers' sounds so creepy, like as if it was his evil plan lol
before the challenger and columbia disasters, everybody knew what was happening. but the astronauts didn't and the press didn't, and thats all that mattered, they just crossed their fingers. come to find out that nasa could have sent up atlantis to the columbia shuttle to rescue them in plenty of time, but would you risk another several astronauts lives to save the others?
under0ath316 1 year ago
If this shit exploded on 4th of july it would of been like a killer bottle rocket and it would be a classic!!!!
vtecivicsib18 1 year ago
@vtecivicsib18
Diaf. FFS
sakar181 1 year ago
@vtecivicsib18
It is 'Would Have' NOT 'Would of'
The subtlety in pronunciation leads to the rampant misuse of this phrase; however “would of” is never correct and may make you appear as if you are not educated and stupid - which you probably are.
eltonfan30 1 year ago
@eltonfan30 Am i reall the one who is stupid, you care about my grammar and im the stupid one.. find something real to talk about n go cry to mommy about it..
vtecivicsib18 1 year ago
@eltonfan30
What a total sadistic TWAT!...get.a.fuckingggg...life!
how much attension do you have to pay to somones comment,to notice that,and then feel you need to comment about a mispelt comment...what a full scale nob you are.
M4DDZ 1 year ago
I've never seen the Whiteroom recordings before... amazing...
HunkeyPunk 1 year ago
Where's part 2?
ftegger4347899 2 years ago
It is on youtube.
trekkiepro 2 years ago