Extrasolar Planet Gliese 667 Cb (2009) [720p]

[rwp041980]

Has anyone seen the movie Pandorum? Good sci fi movie.

[rwp041980]

We need Dennis Quaid, Cam Gigandet, Ben Foster and Cung Le and 59,996 more people to make a huge gothic looking spaceship and put them in suspended animation.

[shtuphJT]

Well...that was boring.

[geneskin]

ive heard that there is aready some polish people living on gliese 667cb

[UNSCful]

that 1 biggest Sun and Two dwarf sun in 0:17

In life if happen our sun has 2 or 3 might it 3 shadow and too hot and too much energy for earth right ?

[TheWickedEnd0851]

We need some kind of technology that beams us to a destination thats in sight,i would love nothing more then to go to a planet just like earth :D

[morpheusxnyc]

@TheWickedEnd0851 - Well, even if matter disassembly, transmission and reassembly (a.k.a. beaming) technology existed, it would probably be out of the question due to the distance and the amount of debris in between.

However, assuming we could create on, some type of warp drive/tachyon field might do the trick as they either ignore the speed of light barrier as in the case of a tachyon field or warp space time so severely as to compress the distance massively. Theoretically speaking, of course.

[restlesspride666]

thumbs up if you knew facts even before google came out.

[AaaaghJOE]

some people are really stupid. ty djx for explaining to them

[djxatlanta]

@AaaaghJOE - it's more effective in person when I get to do my *snap-snap* =)

[TrueHamal]

Why do they do these researches when we can find exo-planets using WWT, Google Sky, Wikisky, and so on? Why do they say exo-planets cant' be seen excepted in the way they do their researches? Why do they lie to the People?

[djxatlanta]

@TrueHamal - dude, what the f*ck are you talking about? The vast majority of planets discovered so far are only detectable indirectly by either carefully watching their gravitational effects on their parent stars over the course of months or years or by waiting to see if they happen to transit their parent stars (like an eclipse). Only a small fraction -- perhaps only a half dozen or so -- have been imaged directly either by Hubble or large ground-based observatories.

[TrueHamal]

@djxatlanta

You are the only one.

[restlesspride666]

@TrueHamal LOL@U

[FFVNet]

@TrueHamal Your stupid everything on google sky has already been discovered. They are pics of the universe taken by NASA or who evers telescopes

[TrueHamal]

@FFVNet

Maybe you are the more stupid man among us.

[Nickah37]

@TrueHamal You can't seriously be that stupid...?

[1700tt]

you really can't see stars when your in space. It's for cinematic purposes only why do it in movies and such.

[djxatlanta]

@1700tt - just as on Earth, it depends on the viewing conditions... if you're in a spacecraft with bright interior illumination, you would not see any stars looking outside a porthole. If all the lights were switched off and astronauts' eyes were accustomed to the dark, then absolutely you would see stars -- more clearly than most places on Earth (save for extremely remote and dry locations).

[Jenivera]

it's REACH! help them fight off the.... monsters....

[lzoli18B]

did you do this animation? it looks pretty cool.

[mikefan09]

majestic, glorious, and enchanting! what wonders await when we can go to these far away "earths"

[CO2Junkie]

@mikefan09 - Yep. The cosmos is beautiful... and not to be a negative Nelly but I have to wonder what horrors await any 'nearby' civilizations that can't fend us off :-\

[vamponular01]

i guess all of this stuff about gliese 581 g has made 667 been forgotten but now it might be re-remembered? :}

[AZTECAZfilm]

how humans want to find new planets if it can barely explore the earth



[Diddds79]

@AZTECAZfilm you on about the ocean we've covered this earth there is most likely not 1 square metre of this earth ie dry land that hasnt had human feet on it yes the ocean has yet to be totally discovered but why when we cant breath freely down there ?

[tcsdef]

@Diddds79

You're right for some points, but still slightly off

yes, more people have been to outer space than the depths of the pacific ocean

but forget the Earth, we humans haven't even figured ourselves out yet like how the human brain transforms a disturbance in a medium,(noise) into sound we hear in our heads

And the reason why humans can't breathe underwater is because we don't have gills and there isn't any physically breathable oxygen (g) inside water

[elazar79]

Video Bisu!!!

[Justina508]

does not look like it it should be white green and a little bit of yellow

[gamefreak101xxx]

HOLY SHIT ITS PLANET REACH!!!! ....oh?

[bikoy123456]

shut up its a joke

[Rahavin1]

wheres the audio?

[djxatlanta]

@Rahavin1 - no audio -- this visualization is video only. =)

[SURSouthRider]

I Always Thought That This Planet (2x Times The Size Of Earth) Glise 581g Would Be Heaven, When People Die They Go There (If There Good)...That Would Be My Crazy Opinon...

[kawasakikx250ff]

2 bad we will never go there :D

[anonymous133711]

planet reach

[andycook1111]

@anonymous133711 no dude it is not reach. fail

[alexdragoon74]

True name is Gliese 667 Cb  a planet of the third star of this system...

[Torrriful]

I swear to god on every video that has to do with this planet, there's always a comment like OMFG IT'S PLANET REACH

[djxatlanta]

@Torrriful - this isn't even the same planet that's been in the news of late (which unfortunately has been discounted)... there are plenty of stars with the name Gliese as a prefix. But yes, it does get really tiring to hear the same comments over and over again. We're just at the beginning of being able to find Earth-like planets... there will be plenty more to come -- and once we find some where water or oxygen are detected, all the drama will start up again. LOL

[mesfest]

Et phone home XD

[antiazazel]

@cyber8000, we shall see who realy are the dumbasses. in fact soon enough you shall see for yourself. BTW massive difference between religion and faith actually.

It sure as hell doesnt matter how many planets are found so far away. There just is no way at all anyone here on earth can go there.

[xXxnoctis]

OMG ITS REACH!!

[MessUrnebes]

yes, yes, yes... i'm so happy now... i was thinking that i will newer meet e.t... ppppp

[KarbineKyle]

Awesome! Astronomy is one of my favorites! I wonder how long it will be when we figure out ways to get to these strange new worlds? But, depending on how far away is the tricky part: Once you get there, it will be different or not even exist anymore! It's like this: Imagine you are on a world 65 million years away, and you could see Earth. You would see Pangea, and dinosaurs roaming the Earth, soon before they become wiped out. The faster you get to an exoplanet/star, the faster it'll change.

[cazaret]

Gliese 581G not 667 C

[djxatlanta]

@cazaret - This is Gliese 667C... please read the description. There are many stars that share the Gliese name. Also note that I posted this 11 months ago. Thanks for playing. =)

[cyber8000]

Every body look up ''Gliese 581 g'' New earth like planet found!!!!!!

[cyber8000]

@JMGEntertainmentify OMFG LOOK UP ''Gliese 581 g''

[JMGEntertainmentify]

@cyber8000 HOLY SHIT IT LOOKS LIKE EARTH

[paniiz]

haha les good!

[LakeemSkyhook]

looks fake

[MultiMario2011]

looks like coruscant

[homerbear46]

I wouldn't fancy going there...I got sick going to the Philippines...that planet probably has massive mosquitoes and sh*t

[CasualGamerDude]

It would be funny if the citizens on that planet are thinking the exact same about us? lol.Gliesian: "We believe that we have found a planet that can possibly hold life as we know it. We call it 'Sun 875 C'.

I really do hope it houses intelligent life like humans. That would be too cool. Oh if only I was born about 100 years latter. Maybe then we would have some decent technology to be able to confirm anything. If tech advances like it is doing now, 100 years would provide something decent.

[TheKakoa]

I believe in extraterrestrial life, remembers the settlers? until recently have they thought? is there life beyond the ocean, have paved the world, we are in an infinite ocean of dark matter, we are nothing in the middle of everything, thinking there other planets with life, it is very stupid, remember that the universe follows an order this order is repeated physically, so we're just an island of life in the midst of so many..

[camilosilvalindo]

surely life on this planet, but our technology does is weak, there is some technological advancement, such as super machines? something like this?.

[djxatlanta]

It is very unlikely that there is life on this planet. This planet orbits so close to its star that it is tidally locked with one side facing Gliese 667 (warm) and one side facing away (very cold), causing tremendous winds blowing from the day side to the night side. The planet is likely very old, so there would be no tectonic forces and internal heat to serve as chemical sources of energy for microorganisms (as for the black smokers at the bottom of Earth's oceans). Sorry!

[sarahsimagination]

I figure, why not use the dark energy in space for traveling, there is a difference between dark energy and dark matter, dark energy causes the dark matter in space to inevitably expand, the dark energy is composed of electromagnetic and micro waves that form a kinetic energy meaning constant energy. I'm sure we can figure out a way to use that dark energy as a form of power for example, how we take the suns solar energy and use it as a form of energy and power.

[djxatlanta]

Dark energy is thought to act as an anti-gravitational force on massive scales (on objects the size of galaxies and larger), but beyond that, we really don't know what it is, but it is likely not part of the electromagnetic spectrum (of which microwaves are a part). Just as atomic forces acting on each other have no effect on you or me in our macroscopic world (and gravity has no effect in the atomic world), dark energy would have no effect in our macroscopic world.

[sarahsimagination]

It wouldn't hurt to see if the dark energy would work as an energy source.

If we really don't know what it is, why not experiment and discover?

[djxatlanta]

We do know a few things about it ... that it acts on only super huge objects -- galaxies and galaxy clusters. It would have near zero effect on objects the size of stars, planets or people. It would make a very inefficient source of energy compared to solar power or (eventually) fusion power. Another item to consider is that at the scale of planets and people, dark energy is so weak that it can't even be measured directly in a laboratory -- we can only measure its effects on galaxies.

[sarahsimagination]

why don't we use a different method of space travel instead of using the old methods. This will be a step up for mankind with astrophysics.

[djxatlanta]

We can't... as it is right now with our energy equations, we would need an infinite amount of energy to travel exactly at the speed of light (or at least more energy than the entire planet can afford even to travel at 90% the speed of light). The only other option is to open a wormhole through a 5th dimension outside the 4 dimensions of spacetime we live in so we can tunnel from point A to point B without moving or taking up any time. But, we don't know how to do that. Yet. :-)

[sarahsimagination]

the answer is simple, energy is all around us, the universe is energy. Why not use electro-magnetic energy? It is safe and natural.

[djxatlanta]

There are spacecraft designs using solar sails that accelerate from the pressure of sunlight (or lasers or microwaves beamed from Earth). The problem with this design is that the larger the spacecraft (to house the crew, equipment and provisions), the larger the solar sail needs to be (at least a mile or more in diameter)... and these types of spaceships take a LONG time to accelerate to speeds fast enough to travel anywhere.

[djxatlanta]

There are also special gravitational corridors throughout the solar system that spacecraft can coast along, like surfers on a wave. The Genesis spacecraft used them a few years in its mission to collect solar particles in space and return them to earth. They reduce the amount of fuel needed on a mission, but it takes longer to get where you're going.

[sarahsimagination]

How interesting, I never heard of this. Do you know why the gravitational corridors were used for collecting solar particles? Also, what type of solar particles? Do you mean as in matter or in forms of energy or gas. You are talking about teleportation technology right? As in teleporting micro-particles? If that is the case, why not build stargates to makes space exploration a faster and easier process.

[djxatlanta]

The gravitational corridors were used for navigating, not collecting. They are areas of space where the combined gravitational effects of the sun and planets are lessened, making it possible for spacecraft to "coast" from destination to destination. They're not always the quickest way to get way to get anywhere, but they're very energy-efficient. And the particles Genesis collected were atoms and ions blown off the sun by solar flares, captured in specially-build collectors onboard.

[djxatlanta]

Teleportation technology is a long way off and has nothing to do with any space mission -- past, present or planned. Scientists are only able to teleport a few photons or an atom or two at a time. Perhaps in 5-15 years molecules will be able to be teleported. In 20-30 years, physicists could be teleporting simple organisms like viruses or bacteria. Even if we could teleport humans, the computing power required is beyond anything what we have today -- but quantum computers will be changing that.

[ImSuperhuman]

@djxatlanta amen!

[Kosomolomolo]

Holy grail!

She found the answer !!!

lol jk . dont we all wish it was this easy..  :)

[Globox822]

@sarahsimagination How about we first help 5 billion people on this Earth that live in poor conditions and then we can consider wasting money on space projects.

[SkullSyker]

There are actually 3 new planets discovered, that are about 28 lightyears away from us,so pretty close too Earth! with the technology today we still cant reach it.. but its only a manor of time, and scientist will go check it out.. the smallest one is 5 times bigger than Earth, and the biggest one is 25 times bigger than Earth!

HURRAY!

[SkullSyker]

sorry typo, 32 new planets

[djxatlanta]

Fortunately, scientists are getting pretty good at being able to figure out much about all the new planets we're discovering without leaving home. We're able to tell the mass of the planets, and we're starting to be able to tell what gases are in their atmospheres. It won't be long (probably another 10-20 years) before we'll be able to tell if there is vegetation on earth-sized planets (plant life shows up as a bright red when viewed in certain frequencies of infrared light).

[SkullSyker]

Very, Very interesting! :D

Huzzah for technology

[bengacris]

@SkullSyker no, mate 25 time more bigger than earth dont reach Jupiter size, the biggest must be 3 times Jupiter size ;)

[xlDrOpShOtSlx]

@bengacris jupiter is aproximately 10 times bigger than earth

[austincmcm]

@SkullSyker WRONG, unless you are talking soley about rocky exoplanets.

There are gas giants many times larger than jupiter found and 100s of times larger than earth

[PivotDemon548]

@SkullSyker Yay for 2 week plane flights!

[JheakrynaKyAlur]

@SkullSyker

5 times bigger... about same density

woah... 7 to 10 g of gravity

no way i'm going their ;)

[shoshanish]

@JheakrynaKyAlur dude, on earth we have about 5-9G's

not big difference.

[JheakrynaKyAlur]

@shoshanish

no it's 1 G

1G = acceleration of 9,81 m/s²

so pls, try reading a book once in a while, and get your facts right.

you won't survive a permament acceleration of 4 G.

that's the upper limit for rollercoasters to be build.

[shoshanish]

@JheakrynaKyAlur sorry, i just woke up when i wrote that, and i was in a pissy mood

your right, AND I DO READ BOOKS, and i watch plenty of science shows, like nova, horizon, naked science and the universe(tv show).

[Shketri]

@SkullSyker 5-25x bigger than earth? which means the gravity is too high for us to inhabit them right? -.-'

[coolerxd23]

@SkullSyker yeah,,,, another planet to be ready getting jacked up,,,,,,

[MrLinovo]

@SkullSyker

yeah this is  gracy

did u belive

[drtony999]

@SkullSyker Hahaha! Great!

[nascar51523fan]

@SkullSyker manor of time? and you're wrong Gliese 581G is 3 times bigger than the earth

[Oblivionsurveyor]

@SkullSyker The size of the planet may not matter as much as what the materials the planet is composed of. Led for instance.

[ironmaiden0902]

@SkullSyker i hope we have the technology to go time space warp, but what if deadly races resides in those worlds?, might be a death trap

[mikejonsony]

No, no. This is real footage!!

It was taken by a new scout ship on it's way to the planet Krypton.

ARE YOU FOR REAL OR WHAT?

[bigevilchan]

tis is surely computer jenerated

[chris34178]

is this an real video of the planet or computer jenerated

[djxatlanta]

Yes, this is computer-generated... it's just a visualization of what scientists think planet Gliese 667 Cb might look like... although I think they were a bit generous on the water. This planet is about 5-6 times larger than Earth.

[RanDomRahuL]

LOL