our kids will wonder what driving a car was like ( with a oil using internal combustion engine) why winters are so toughas they are walking to work and why we dont have some kinds of foods on our table in the winter like salad greens or citrus fruits,like grandma and grandpa had year round.
You posted this on the wikipedia discussion as well. I think you have a gross misunderstanding of what Kurzweil is talking about in terms of the exponential growth of information systems.
Peak oil is entirely different.
Is your argument, that when oil runs out, information technology will stop? Do you realize there are other forms of energy?
Also it does NOT say "the more rapidly we *consume* our resources" but "the more rapidly we *MINE* our resources". Yes, it’s still a bullshit statement. But the conclusion you’re making is just as much bullshit.
And it was going so well until now…
Another example of why one should always make one’s arguments as short, elegant and concise as possible. With the length of the argument, the likeliness that you trip up grown exponentially too. ^^
The idea that "the more optimistic the prediction" the more likely it would be to be faulty, is itself flawed. First of all, it depends on how you define optimistic. And secondly, for predictions that predict *bad* things, it would obviously be "the *less* optimistic the prediction". Despite it not making the rest of the video wrong, this is bad error, for riding such a high horse, Mr. Bartlett.
I'm beginning to lose interest... and wonder if he's ever going to get around to calculating how long it would take us to run out of wind, sunshine or water currents should we ever... ya know, maybe think about combustion not being the only source of energy...
@BastionKnight prob is oil is energy dense, wind sun does not have the energy concentration that oil gives us. wind power and sun to power our cars trucks good luck....
@wildwindsca I think the bigger problem is that oil companies own the US government. Nikola Tesla has over 6000 patents locked up under the pretext of having military applications, many of them are zero point energy machines which can't be metered and would provide free energy for everyone. I limited my previous suggestions to the solutions we're "allowed" to discuss seriously. Electric cars are still feasible. Electro-magnetic railways would be much better for shipping.
@wildwindsca Magnet rail systems can propel train cars nearly as fast as jets fly. They're emit no carbon, the rails are designed above ground to not obstruct rural wildlife, and they have no risk of crashing like trucks do... If we grid that to every major urban area we could eliminate long haul truck driving entirely, and have distribution centers making short runs with smaller trucks, which could at least be run on bio-diesel.
@BastionKnight typo: They emit*. And I'd like to stress "like trucks do". Everything that moves runs the risk of crashing. They would be severely newsworthy in the case of cargo trains, unlike 18 wheelers which overturn and cause pileups so often that only people directly affected by them remember the incidents a week later.
Search for "FREE ENERGY Home Generator -Zero Point Energy - Off the Grid" on YouTube to find another example of how we are NOT the problem, we are the SOLUTION!
My intention is NOT to troll this series! I want to give others an alternative viewpoint... only that!
@TheHeurist Jesus, you're trolling ALL of these videos?
Settle down, bro. If dumb-asses want to believe in Global Warming they will. Yelling at them for being stupid won't make them read. Live well and people will listen. Being upset and pissy will drive people away. Yes, Global Warming is nonsense. People will do what they believe in regardless of what you have to say about it. So chill out and accept that people do silly things.
Global warming is supported by actual evidence, if you have actual evidence disproving it, please show it.
CO2 traps heat in the Earth(laboratory tested ). And if it traps heat in Earth, doesn't it make sense that MORE CO2 in the atmosphere means MORE heat in the Earth?
This guy talks exponential. Well, MMGW is very similar. The heat grows exponentially as the ice caps shrink because the ice caps deflect heat.
@Seedofwinter The Earth was a lot warmer when humans weren't around. The total flux is well within any normal variation we've seen over the last few million years.
I'm much more concerned about dumping mercury in the ocean than wearing a tank-top.
@bobbygnosis Regardless of how hot it was in the past, doesn't change the fact that WE are the ones making this planet hotter now. And you also fail to acknowledge that some of that heat could be attributed to MASSIVE volcanic eruptions, that killed off lots of species and plants
It's not a fraud as you claimed. Whether it's dangerous for us or not, I think so. We don't even fully understand how we got an ice age or how the dinosaurs went extinct(matter of factly)
@bobbygnosis Regardless of how hot it was in the past, doesn't change the fact that WE are the ones making this planet hotter now. And you also fail to acknowledge that some of that heat could be attributed to MASSIVE volcanic eruptions, that killed off lots of species and plants
It's not a fraud as you claimed. Whether it's dangerous for us or not, I think so. We don't even fully understand how we got an ice age or how the dinosaurs went extinct(matter of factly)
@bobbygnosis I see where you're going. You think I'm linking global warming to an ice age, which I'm not. All I meant by that comment was to say that humanity doesn't understand everything about the Earth or the Universe. Thus I wouldn't only worry about "wearing a tank top" by throwing our entire atmosphere out of equilibrium.
My main point is to say that WE are making this Earth hotter, and it is NOT a myth. And we don't know the ramifications of such action. Facts will always be facts
@TheHeurist - I know that and I will address that lie also. There are MANY different assumptions in this series. We have a population management problem and NOT overpopulation!
It's great stuff about doubling times and such, but it is bad science! It is based upon globalist scarcity lies. The professor is completely given over to those lies. He simply provides a convincing plausibility for this scripted scarcity. Wake up people, you are being lied to. We are NOT running out of oil. Oil does NOT come from dinosaurs and dead plant life! Stop believing these lies.
@TheHeurist : "Oil does NOT come from dinosaurs and dead plant life! Stop believing these lies."
So where do you propose oil comes from then? Hey, I know! Maybe it comes from dead arabs and *that's* why the US is always going to war in the middle east! ... :-|
People will want to find a way to cover their needs sure todays mode of transport will not suffice for the future so lets say we got really efficient and switched from a 30 mpg car to a motorcycle what could we expect? Right now ~70mpg if we got a 250cc what could we do to increase economy while still delivering a human. We already reduced the load the next is reduce the drag.When you reduce drag you reduce the need for as powerful a engine. See Ecomoder for examples of people saving fuel.
everyone here needs to open you mind - let go of the money system which is DEAD and look toward how your gonna save your soul when all goes titis up ....
Dan Winter is a modern day Einstein - his videos ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEOS you'll EVER see
these companys are keeping there share holders happy by bragging how much they dont have saying they do have and then make money in said shares its obvious business sense and i havnt even got a degree i like these videos tho
Just what The Zeitgeist Movement have been saying, just check their webite, aslo you can visit The Venus Project which is the solution for this and other problems. Also if you wanna help with your computer research cures/treatment for diseases like AIDS, Cancer, etc, visit my channel; I have the addresses of both projects in my channel.
Assholes have turned the world into a septic tank and experts like that exist in an attempt to prevent us form poking our heads out of the bullshit they have spent so much time burying us in.
this would probably be a non issue in the future. we will use up all our coal and oil but by then technology will help us use renewable energy to power all the cities (prob not wind or solar, but maybe something else) But until then big oil companies are going to buy or suppress these technologies until they sqeeze all the money out of us and use up all the resources
you base your argument on the notion that we are in control but you are wrong we are NOT in control. God creates evil.Isa; 45;7 says I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.
He has caused it all. So you may think that if you act or dont act will effect the outcome, it wont because even your actions are predetermined before time began. For more TRUTH go to grace and truth.net
You stupid phucks are missing the point. The point that is important isn't buried within these 8 videos. The point is that this isn't new. Throughout history the wealth has remained in the same families, as they have known from other failed civilizations before them that eventually people need to be killed off. Ever wonder why only .001% of millionaired are "self made"? That's why. It's not about doom and gloom or conspiracy theory. It's called COMMON PHUCKING SENSE! Wake up dumbasses!
This has inspired me to re-learn math the right way. I just took my Calculus exam yesterday and got a 70 on it, even after studying all week for it, trying to memorize the formulas. Instead, I should have learned proofs much better. That way, I'd have been able to follow the logic of the functions instead of memorizing them. Never too late to start...
This has inspired me to re-learn math the right way. I just took my Calculus exam yesterday and got a 70 on it, even after studying all week for it, trying to memorize the formulas. Instead, I should have learned proofs much better. That way, I'd have been able to follow the logic of the functions instead of memorizing them. Never too late to start...
We cant keep tapping an oil well until theres nothing left. When an oil well is 40-50% it starts to become incredibly difficult to extract oil. The sweet light stuff is at the top, and the heavy, full of sand plus other crap is at the bottom. Not only does it take more energy to extract but you get less energy out of it.
So whenever you get to the point when it takes the energy of 100 barrels of oil to extract 100 barrels youre wasting your time, and wasting oil!
@robertklein2000 Tar sands arent oil wells. They havent had to drill through x miles of rock, then pressurize the well(not always a must) plus consume as much water as you get oil out of the ground. Did you know that we've basically got to the point where humans demand for water to drink, bathe, water plants etc is equalling the demand for water to pump oil? Like in Saudi Arabia? So the rate at which we pump oil will eventually have to slow unless we want to cause deaths by drought.
>> Values need to change; those that are pro-life need to watch this video lol.
-- Whether someone is pro-life or pro-murder has NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
-- Population reduction is not a conversation on this video. Slowing or reducing population growth is.
-- Reducing growth doesn't mean abort babies. You can reduce growth just by having people of the world have 3 kids or less. Yes THREE. Disease & famine will reduce kill off that 3rd "growth" automatically.
@MikeSPx24bj9 Eventually there will be policy which limits children etc. I think we are still far from such concepts considering we have televisions about 20+ children families.
2:24 "Don't believe any prediction of the life expectancy of a non-renewable resource until you have confirmed the prediction by repeating the calculation"
Although the message should be in a new bible, some of the points he makes are faulty. In the politician's statements, they are talking about maximizing self-sufficiency by using more US resources instead of foreign resources, obviously derived from the crises in the 70's.
I hope we dont use our reserves until it runs out elsewhere. Its a safety Military factor. This is scary stuff for those countries who have huge populations and are tempted to attack their neighbor or the other countries who still have natural resources. When will they attack, at 2/3 bottle full?
Bartlett's entire line of reasoning is flawed, for he conflates the idea of procurement with that of consumption. Notably at 2:49 and 3:19. He also injects loose corollary in a failed attempt to counter loose corollary. The man's not a genius, at best a decent salesman to impressionable minds.
@tacoland2000 I am so impressed with your confidence that I'm dying to see your re-calculation of Bartlett's numbers, sans the flaws in his line of reasoning. When will we run out of coal? oil? Us impressionable minds are yearning for a better salesman.
@PRIMEx420 I'm sure you ARE yearning for a better salesman! The fact that even minimally educated skeptics deflate your demagogues must be irritating, to say the least. What numbers are you referencing? Because numbers without viable formulas are worthless.
"When will we run out of coal or oil?" you ask. You ask the wrong questions, assuming many stupid things. Humanity isn't some beast progressing on a linear (or even an exponential) trajectory. You are simple, so you love oversimplification.
@tacoland2000 way to "yes u R" my sarcasm. zing! anyways, u seem minimally-educated enough, go ahead, deflate away. btw, name-calling is a poor sub for facts. u still havent pointed out the flaws in his reasoning, OR mine. if u really had something to say, u'd suggest the "right" questions to ask, vs
@tacoland2000 vs just saying that mine are "wrong". u're either a frustrated pseudo-intellectual or a genius above my understanding. however the latter wouldn't have bothered at all, while the former probably got hard typing
@tacoland2000 you have a point there ... but the statement of time magazine also is very vague ... it does not mention why we should mine coal as much as we can? and how mining coal at a faster rate would help us achieve self sufficiency.. it is safe to assume that ... humans mine coal to consume and not just to procure and "store it up" ... because ... whats the point in mining it and storing it up ... when coal is already safely stored in the ground ?
The question he poses: Are human beings smarter than bacteria on plated media or yeast cells in a warm bottle of corked fruit juice?? (every yeast population will grow exponentially producing carbon dioxide and alcohol from sugar until alcohol reaches 11% where they kill themselves off....with their own waste product...ethyl alcohol.)
Until humans can understand that "things that cannot go on forever generally don't".
who cares about volcanos you idiots. CO2?? who cares about that either??
water vapor is a much more insidious greenhouse gas. go out on a cloudy night and its much warmer than a clear night . youve noticed that right? the only way to cool the poor earth is to 1st get it hot enough to burn all this pesky water vapor off. eventually the empty ocean basins will provide arable land, and just think how easy fishing will be (at least till they rot.) oh and tsunami warnings will cease too.
432,000,000,000/100,000,000 is4320 tonnes that each 'large' electric plant would use for the entire 800 years. lol divide 4320/800 and you get each of the 'large' hundred million (ROFL) plants consuming 5.4 tonnes of coal/year.
Of course, Forbes, Businessweek and such all cook up their data routinely to make the picture as rosy or as glum as the government tells them to. This is no surprise.
If it were true that individual volcanic eruptions dominated human emissions and were causing the rise in CO2 concentrations, then these CO2 records would be full of spikes -- one for each eruption. Instead, such records show a smooth and regular trend. The fact of the matter is, the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions.
@picobravo30 the records are absolutely full of localized spikes. These are easily observed and have been reported in every scientific journal I've looked at in the last 15 years that covered the topic at all. You have to know there is such a thing as a CARBON ISOTOPE to figure out the localization, to start. You're very very wrong. Global warming is a fact like gravity. CO2's role is a fact like gravity is a fact. Human CO2 emission needs accurate measure even now, so I'll let it go there
what scientific journals are you talking about exactly? can you please reference them for me as i am very very interested.. be as specific as you can..
Science, Nature, I've read a lot in the last 10 years. It's too much hassle to shove all the URL's here past the youtube filter. I'll save your message so I can get back to it. You can do the searching yourself even faster. If you're not willing, that's not my problem.
wow you're amazing. How does it feel to be so all-knowing.. to never be wrong or ever have to doubt yourself? Don"t you ever worry that such absolute conviction in yourself might obscure other possibilities? can anybody be completely right about anything?
I'm not done searching. I DID FIND your quotation with a few words changed to mean the PRECISE OPPOSITE of your claim about volcanoes, showing they are no more than 1/150th of human CO2 output so far. I'm still searching. It's not about being all-knowing, it's about refusing fraud at every step and doing my due diligence homework.
It's about having no absolute conviction, only an absolute refusal of fraud.
i changed nothing you fool.. and writing in CAPITAL LETTERS does absolutely nothing except prove to me that you're exactly what i think you are.. just another loud-mouthed know-it-all north american with shit for brains and way too much time on his hands.. you're a joke
humans cause global warming. Period. Volcanoes are a small factor. The C14 isotope thing is still on my list of things to find. The c12/c13 ratio is what I found. Anyhow, joke's on you, happy travels Cap'n Chuckles.
looks like all your study and reading hasn't taught you much.. read my original comment again my confused friend and you will see that you are arguing against nothing.. humans cause global warming- yes.. volcanoes are a small factor- yes... the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions... what don't you understand dumb ass? i've been in agreement with you the whole time.. your confusion has been pretty funny actually..
by the way sister (because you have been a bitch) you really should try to understand what someone is saying before you start rubbing sand into your pussy and getting all worked up like that.. you dumb ass
If you really have a science degree why do you have to boast with it? Is this your best argument? A degree in IT does not qualify you to be a climate scientist as well. Claiming something like "...humans cause global warming, period" end of discussion, does sound like it is so, 'cause I say so! Is this how you defended your thesis at the University? If you had been my student I would have kicked you out of my department,...period!
>> humans cause global warming. Volcanoes are a small factor.
==> Global warming a lie, a hoax, & part of a new religion, Scientists abandon WorldNetDaily com
650 to dissent at U.N. climate change conference
Dec 11, 2008
-- WASHINGTON – A United Nations climate change conference in Poland is about 2 get a surprise from 650 leading scientists who scoff at doomsday reports of man-made global warming – labeling them variously a lie, a hoax & part of a new religion.
• Warming fears are the "worst scientific scandal in the history ... . When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists." -- U.N. IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning Ph.D. environmental physical chemist.
@MikeSPx24bj9 that is a fucking lie and you know it. That's OK.
I will ensure to personally kill, in the future, every person who is guilty of making the problem worse. It is my duty to human kind and to my own survival
==> Global warming: lie, a hoax, & part of a new religion, Scientists abandon [WorldNetDaily com]
650 to dissent @ U.N. climate change conference
12/11/2008
-- WASHINGTON – A United Nations climate change conference in Poland is about 2get a surprise from 650 LEADING scientists who scoff at doomsday reports of man-made global warming – labeling them variously a lie, a hoax & part of a new religion.
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
@MikeSPx24bj9 Whether it's some precondition to the apocalypse is another matter in itself BUT the problem needs to be fixed and policy enforced immediately.
We need to change our ways asap. I think at this point in type, with all that is going on, most people are aware that things aren't sustainable.
-- They're not sustainable AS LONG AS we're relying on non-renewable energy sources. Other than that California, USA has enough farmland to provide enough food for the whole world. They currently supply 65% of the worlds' food anyway.
>> Your obviously not aware of the states *severe* water shortages which limits farming by a large margin
-- There is plenty of water that can B channeled from the ocean. Salt water isn't harmful to crops. If we can make 1000s of miles of underground plumbing, railroads, roads, electrical cords, so can we with ocean water.
-- Also, ppl can grow their own mini-farms & w/ rain can produce enough for them & their neighbors.
-- Never will there be a food shortage. That's a myth.
@MikeSPx24bj9 said "-- Never will there be a food shortage. That's a myth."
The Irish Potato Famine was a myth? The masses of starving, disease-infected, people in African 3rd-world countries are a myth? I think you know better and perhaps misspoke.
There don't have to be food shortages, but they do happen all over the world for various reasons. And a world-wide shortage of palatable food is conceivable under unchecked population growth.
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com is a Top 500 website, according to Alexa . com, the search and ratings agency affiliate of Amazon.com, and the No. 1 independent newssite. WorldNetDaily currently attracts nearly 5 million unique visitors a month and more than 40 million pageviews, according to its own internal monitoring software.
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com was voted the most popular website on the Internet every week for nearly two years running between 1999 and 2001 on the independent, European-based Global100 . com.
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com consistently ranks as the "stickiest" newssite on the Internet, meaning readers spent more time on it than on any other - including giants CNN, MSNBC and ESPN.
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com often ranks at the top of the news pack in number of pageviews per user and minutes per page - two other important categories measured by Internet ratings agencies.
@MikeSPx24bj9 Everyone who says global warming is a hoax is a mass murderer as bad as Hitler. All island nations are put at risk by global warming of being killed off due to rising oceans and killing ocean life due to acidification of the oceans. Mass murderers must be killed. Choose
>> Everyone who says global warming is a hoax is a mass murderer as bad as Hitler.
-- Okay. We'll all believe you LATER.
• "Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined." -- Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, PA.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
• "The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It doesn't have open minds ... . I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists." -- Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the U.N.-supported International Year of the Planet.
• "It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming." -- U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
@MikeSPx24bj9 doubling the CO2 concentration will cause most mammals on earth to have cardiac problems and temperatures will rise high enough some places will simply stop having winter at all. Ever again.
You are the stupidest most ignorant and certainly most wrong human on the face of this earth. Shame on you and may your life be made thankfully short by the people you hurt. You are scum.
-- 75% of carbon emission are from animal "emissions"
-- Global warming is a tool of elitists to help create a centralized government worldwide without borders which would end the middle class and create a global slave society ruled by our debtors.
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
• "Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapor and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will." -- Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
• "Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined." -- Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, PA.
• "Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense ... . The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning." -- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
• "CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another ... . Every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so ... . Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver's seat and developing nations walking barefoot." -- Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
The winter was so warm and dry that now we have a drought where I live. The temperature was above 0 C in December 3 times, one time overnight 8 C.
The global temperature measurements are ALL TOO HIGH and getting higher.
PWN ON YOU , award for being Always Right AGain for me. What the hell makes you such a tard? Your lies are still lies. The earth warmed FASTER than predicted, NO COOLING IN SIGHT. Rising oceans, death for island nations. Fact, Fact, Fact, Fact, fact
@MikeSPx24bj9 So your stupid enough to think that your local weather has anything to do with the average climate of the world over a multi-year stretch?!! Yup its confirmed you are the fucktard now get back in class.
>> So your stupid enough to think that your local weather has anything to do with the average climate of the world over a multi-year stretch?!!
-- Are you sure what "your" saying?
-- I never said anything about local whether in all my posts all over the entire Internet since the first time I logged on. I never talk about LOCAL WEATHER ANYWHERE. What are you smoking?
-- My post was awhile ago. When you post you need to quote what someone else has sd, just as I have done.
As you say, you first have to detach yourself from all your normal loyalties, and just look at the facts, and come to a conlusion, totally impartially.
I have done loads of laymans research, and am HORRIFIED. History is altered to make murderers and thieves and liers, look like th egood guys.
They guys who murdered and enslaved your village, then wrote history books, telling you how nicely it all happened. And your ancestros cry, in graves.
this old guy worked for GMC, no wonder he now teaches this non sense, all hes saying is that need to kill alot of people, they need alot of more oil, or else the whole USA economy will go to hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;
WHY DOESNT HE SAY USA USES 25 % OF THE WORLDS OIL, AND INFLATION IS PRODUCED THANKS TO MASS MEDIA AND COMSUMPTION, AND CALLING IT ECONOMIC GROUTH, AND WHY DOESNT HE GIVE ANY REAL SOLUTION LIKE RENEWABLE ENERGY, MAYBE BECAUSE HUGE INDUSTRIES WOULD LOOSE PROFITS, HMMM....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
So this guy just said that previous oil figures were faulty; faked by the oil companies actually. Than goes on to say that the alaska oil is an estimate aka not accurate. But he has the nerve to say that this graphic is accurate. Even if it is based on the same oil company estimates as the last..
This removes the need to believe whether global warming is man-made or not......consumer society is on an inevitable road to self destruction! I hope you're appreciating this golden age!!!
@ooothatsinteresting Golden age? I hope thats sarcasm. I don't think consuming the worlds energy as fast as we can before the end constitutes a Golden age, I think its an Age of Ignorance, and The 21st century will be looked at with shame in future years.
He is absolutely correct about the mathematics and the ignorance of the potential effects, but he does make some logical errors.
For instance, he repeatedly conflates the idea of drilling or mining with consuming. Drilling for reserves is not consumption. To prove out reserves, wells are drilled and then capped. That is not the same a consumption.
@Furiens I would imagine that depends on the quality of the find, since that determines the final cost. The lower the quality (and thus the higher extraction/refining) the cost. More expensive would be kept offline longer.
@djmusic111 Minor point, but what I mean is that *extracting* oil is consumption and decreases supply. It is used up. Drilling and capping is not consumption. All it does is increase the size of proven reserves. It does not decrease the supply, since none of that oil is used until it is later extracted. Still a great set of video's... ;-)
@freedomsadvocate You are the one who is making a very simple economic mistake. As a mining company, you don't produce surplus energy, you only respond to demand otherwise it devalues the value of what you are producing. You only produce so much as to meet the demand.
What is "overpopulation"? When does it accur? Oh, you don't know? ^^
Is it when you do not have enough food or is it when you don't have enough room for all the people or if you don't have enough room in the swimming pool or you don't have enough room room in a university?
Well, the "elite" decides who have enough and who don't... ; )
Funny you should mention the 'elite', I think they're making lies and propaganda at an ever faster rate, because the common people are starting to wake up.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is fear mongering if I have ever seen it. This matter is a serious concern but this professor is using data which only benefits his calculations. He is still living in the 70's.
I just want to make sure it is clear that I'm not scared about this. It should be of concern "but" the law of nature will take its course and we will adapt.
then why is this fear mongering? I thank those people who stick out their necks to what sound more to "realisation" to me. But, always check facts yourself...just like the professor said...
lol, what cave have u been sleeping in? Do your homework, and you'll see he is just giving facts. Besides, don't shoot the messenger for giving you bad news!
Enter the middle eastern supplies.
audiopro316 3 weeks ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
@audiopro316 I know right?! This entire series I was just thinking about the war after 9-11.
As if it wasn't already smack in your face obvious, now there's some beautiful math behind it.
lundinlucas91 1 week ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
price and productivity can and do mitigate the problems outlined here
FreedomAtRisk 1 month ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
Down the curve on schedule? Life is fucking racecar ain't it.
zssamgh 1 month ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
our kids will wonder what driving a car was like ( with a oil using internal combustion engine) why winters are so toughas they are walking to work and why we dont have some kinds of foods on our table in the winter like salad greens or citrus fruits,like grandma and grandpa had year round.
wildwindsca 2 months ago
we humans have pretty much screwed our selfs over, mainly because we have the urge to know and want more.
ThePariky 3 months ago
4:48 is proof right there, that Ray Kurzweil’s concept of the “singularity” is silly pseudo-scientific bullshit.
Evi1M4chine 3 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
@Evi1M4chine
You posted this on the wikipedia discussion as well. I think you have a gross misunderstanding of what Kurzweil is talking about in terms of the exponential growth of information systems.
Peak oil is entirely different.
Is your argument, that when oil runs out, information technology will stop? Do you realize there are other forms of energy?
charlesdarwin321 2 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
Also it does NOT say "the more rapidly we *consume* our resources" but "the more rapidly we *MINE* our resources". Yes, it’s still a bullshit statement. But the conclusion you’re making is just as much bullshit.
And it was going so well until now…
Another example of why one should always make one’s arguments as short, elegant and concise as possible. With the length of the argument, the likeliness that you trip up grown exponentially too. ^^
Whatever, it was still very interesting and good.
Evi1M4chine 3 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
The idea that "the more optimistic the prediction" the more likely it would be to be faulty, is itself flawed. First of all, it depends on how you define optimistic. And secondly, for predictions that predict *bad* things, it would obviously be "the *less* optimistic the prediction". Despite it not making the rest of the video wrong, this is bad error, for riding such a high horse, Mr. Bartlett.
Evi1M4chine 3 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
I'm beginning to lose interest... and wonder if he's ever going to get around to calculating how long it would take us to run out of wind, sunshine or water currents should we ever... ya know, maybe think about combustion not being the only source of energy...
BastionKnight 3 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
@BastionKnight prob is oil is energy dense, wind sun does not have the energy concentration that oil gives us. wind power and sun to power our cars trucks good luck....
wildwindsca 2 months ago
@wildwindsca I think the bigger problem is that oil companies own the US government. Nikola Tesla has over 6000 patents locked up under the pretext of having military applications, many of them are zero point energy machines which can't be metered and would provide free energy for everyone. I limited my previous suggestions to the solutions we're "allowed" to discuss seriously. Electric cars are still feasible. Electro-magnetic railways would be much better for shipping.
BastionKnight 2 months ago
@wildwindsca Magnet rail systems can propel train cars nearly as fast as jets fly. They're emit no carbon, the rails are designed above ground to not obstruct rural wildlife, and they have no risk of crashing like trucks do... If we grid that to every major urban area we could eliminate long haul truck driving entirely, and have distribution centers making short runs with smaller trucks, which could at least be run on bio-diesel.
BastionKnight 2 months ago
@BastionKnight typo: They emit*. And I'd like to stress "like trucks do". Everything that moves runs the risk of crashing. They would be severely newsworthy in the case of cargo trains, unlike 18 wheelers which overturn and cause pileups so often that only people directly affected by them remember the incidents a week later.
BastionKnight 2 months ago
i like how he talks about a teacher like they're a peon
anonymouslol 5 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
Hello people.
i'm from Saudi Arabia, and here is what i know.
the Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources published a statement for a newspapers here in Saudi Arabia.
he said quote:
" the Kingdom can continue to produce crude oil at current levels for eighty years"
he actually said the word "current levels" in Arabic! for 80 years!
you can do the calculation and try to guess how many years really left ahead
i'm just sayin'....
TheAerosmither 6 months ago
Search for "FREE ENERGY Home Generator -Zero Point Energy - Off the Grid" on YouTube to find another example of how we are NOT the problem, we are the SOLUTION!
My intention is NOT to troll this series! I want to give others an alternative viewpoint... only that!
TheHeurist 6 months ago
The DATA is false. Try searching YouTube for "Climategat 2-US Government Involved in Data Manipulation" and you'll get the 'run down' on it!
TheHeurist 6 months ago
@TheHeurist Jesus, you're trolling ALL of these videos?
Settle down, bro. If dumb-asses want to believe in Global Warming they will. Yelling at them for being stupid won't make them read. Live well and people will listen. Being upset and pissy will drive people away. Yes, Global Warming is nonsense. People will do what they believe in regardless of what you have to say about it. So chill out and accept that people do silly things.
Help your friends, family and community.
And chill out.
bobbygnosis 6 months ago
@bobbygnosis - I'm not trolling anything! That is not my intent. You are reading me wrong.
TheHeurist 6 months ago
@bobbygnosis - I am not trolling these videos. That is a false characterization of what I am doing.
I do not think people are dumb asses, do you?
I am not shouting.
People my believe what they want to, but I have every right to provide them with an alternative to what is being said here.
TheHeurist 6 months ago
@bobbygnosis How is global warming nonsense?
Global warming is supported by actual evidence, if you have actual evidence disproving it, please show it.
CO2 traps heat in the Earth(laboratory tested ). And if it traps heat in Earth, doesn't it make sense that MORE CO2 in the atmosphere means MORE heat in the Earth?
This guy talks exponential. Well, MMGW is very similar. The heat grows exponentially as the ice caps shrink because the ice caps deflect heat.
Evidence matters
Seedofwinter 4 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
@Seedofwinter The Earth was a lot warmer when humans weren't around. The total flux is well within any normal variation we've seen over the last few million years.
I'm much more concerned about dumping mercury in the ocean than wearing a tank-top.
bobbygnosis 4 months ago
@bobbygnosis Regardless of how hot it was in the past, doesn't change the fact that WE are the ones making this planet hotter now. And you also fail to acknowledge that some of that heat could be attributed to MASSIVE volcanic eruptions, that killed off lots of species and plants
It's not a fraud as you claimed. Whether it's dangerous for us or not, I think so. We don't even fully understand how we got an ice age or how the dinosaurs went extinct(matter of factly)
Seedofwinter 4 months ago
@bobbygnosis Regardless of how hot it was in the past, doesn't change the fact that WE are the ones making this planet hotter now. And you also fail to acknowledge that some of that heat could be attributed to MASSIVE volcanic eruptions, that killed off lots of species and plants
It's not a fraud as you claimed. Whether it's dangerous for us or not, I think so. We don't even fully understand how we got an ice age or how the dinosaurs went extinct(matter of factly)
Seedofwinter 4 months ago
@Seedofwinter If you don't understand how the ice age happened then how can you claim that you know about anthropogenic global warming?
bobbygnosis 4 months ago
@bobbygnosis I see where you're going. You think I'm linking global warming to an ice age, which I'm not. All I meant by that comment was to say that humanity doesn't understand everything about the Earth or the Universe. Thus I wouldn't only worry about "wearing a tank top" by throwing our entire atmosphere out of equilibrium.
My main point is to say that WE are making this Earth hotter, and it is NOT a myth. And we don't know the ramifications of such action. Facts will always be facts
Seedofwinter 4 months ago
@TheHeurist - I know that and I will address that lie also. There are MANY different assumptions in this series. We have a population management problem and NOT overpopulation!
TheHeurist 6 months ago
free enrgy.
keshe foundation
see at red ice radio
first depapoulation masons.
wearish 6 months ago
It's great stuff about doubling times and such, but it is bad science! It is based upon globalist scarcity lies. The professor is completely given over to those lies. He simply provides a convincing plausibility for this scripted scarcity. Wake up people, you are being lied to. We are NOT running out of oil. Oil does NOT come from dinosaurs and dead plant life! Stop believing these lies.
TheHeurist 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheHeurist : "Oil does NOT come from dinosaurs and dead plant life! Stop believing these lies."
So where do you propose oil comes from then? Hey, I know! Maybe it comes from dead arabs and *that's* why the US is always going to war in the middle east! ... :-|
dustyroot 6 months ago in playlist The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
I thought population/usage growth was always taken into consideration when making such predictions.
saturdayat6 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
spend tons of money on idiotic social issues,,, die anyway,,,
Sun remains a main sequence star, continually growing warmer and brighter by ~10% every 1 billion years.
no matter what you do,,, the sun will GET you in the end,,,
unless you LEAVE,,, that is where mankind needs to spend its money,,,
on LEAVING,,,
lars008 7 months ago
People will want to find a way to cover their needs sure todays mode of transport will not suffice for the future so lets say we got really efficient and switched from a 30 mpg car to a motorcycle what could we expect? Right now ~70mpg if we got a 250cc what could we do to increase economy while still delivering a human. We already reduced the load the next is reduce the drag.When you reduce drag you reduce the need for as powerful a engine. See Ecomoder for examples of people saving fuel.
cdltpx 7 months ago
@nicosmind..I agree but your mistake is thinking us oil addicts will not suck at that sand
Dogeatsdogs 8 months ago
everyone who wants to learn about the oil crisis just look up "peak oil"
BULZZixAGP 8 months ago
everyone here needs to open you mind - let go of the money system which is DEAD and look toward how your gonna save your soul when all goes titis up ....
Dan Winter is a modern day Einstein - his videos ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEOS you'll EVER see
Tradewindow 9 months ago
these companys are keeping there share holders happy by bragging how much they dont have saying they do have and then make money in said shares its obvious business sense and i havnt even got a degree i like these videos tho
Jamieduk999 9 months ago
Just what The Zeitgeist Movement have been saying, just check their webite, aslo you can visit The Venus Project which is the solution for this and other problems. Also if you wanna help with your computer research cures/treatment for diseases like AIDS, Cancer, etc, visit my channel; I have the addresses of both projects in my channel.
saultube44 9 months ago
Assholes have turned the world into a septic tank and experts like that exist in an attempt to prevent us form poking our heads out of the bullshit they have spent so much time burying us in.
darkblood626 9 months ago
this would probably be a non issue in the future. we will use up all our coal and oil but by then technology will help us use renewable energy to power all the cities (prob not wind or solar, but maybe something else) But until then big oil companies are going to buy or suppress these technologies until they sqeeze all the money out of us and use up all the resources
defgill 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you base your argument on the notion that we are in control but you are wrong we are NOT in control. God creates evil.Isa; 45;7 says I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.
He has caused it all. So you may think that if you act or dont act will effect the outcome, it wont because even your actions are predetermined before time began. For more TRUTH go to grace and truth.net
artymarty100 1 minute ago
artymarty100 1 year ago
Just say fuck. You sound retarded.
bfnasianceno 1 year ago
You stupid phucks are missing the point. The point that is important isn't buried within these 8 videos. The point is that this isn't new. Throughout history the wealth has remained in the same families, as they have known from other failed civilizations before them that eventually people need to be killed off. Ever wonder why only .001% of millionaired are "self made"? That's why. It's not about doom and gloom or conspiracy theory. It's called COMMON PHUCKING SENSE! Wake up dumbasses!
vaginaflypaper 1 year ago
man i wish i kept learning maths, this guy explains it well
dombower 1 year ago
Hubbert has been proven wrong. This guy is full of crap.
echosyst 1 year ago
@echosyst Hubbert hasn't been proven wrong. Technology pushes the peak away, but that can only last for so long. Oil is non renewable dude.
jimbobanalbeats 10 months ago 5
@jimbobanalbeats Absolutely correct. Well said mate.
supertuber97 10 months ago
HA-ha-ha, (laughing) 2 million people saw Part 1 of the 8 part talk and only 160K got this far.
LOL
atthehops 1 year ago
@atthehops i find that frightening. Nobody cares about anything real anymore.
Steaksngainers 1 year ago
This has inspired me to re-learn math the right way. I just took my Calculus exam yesterday and got a 70 on it, even after studying all week for it, trying to memorize the formulas. Instead, I should have learned proofs much better. That way, I'd have been able to follow the logic of the functions instead of memorizing them. Never too late to start...
Kakarot21591 1 year ago 44
This has inspired me to re-learn math the right way. I just took my Calculus exam yesterday and got a 70 on it, even after studying all week for it, trying to memorize the formulas. Instead, I should have learned proofs much better. That way, I'd have been able to follow the logic of the functions instead of memorizing them. Never too late to start...
Kakarot21591 1 year ago
I like this video. Thank you for your sharing. Hope to see next your video.
many9662 1 year ago
Lol, 3:11 "Simon says", that was a fun game.
TheAlexander356 1 year ago
Videos are fun to watch; however, I challenge the listeners to find a few logical errors in his arguments (there are many).
YourNameHere1212 1 year ago
@YourNameHere1212 He may take some liberties for effect, but his math is not wrong.
Beauxdeauxfinglok 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cool i like it
soclives182 1 year ago
We cant keep tapping an oil well until theres nothing left. When an oil well is 40-50% it starts to become incredibly difficult to extract oil. The sweet light stuff is at the top, and the heavy, full of sand plus other crap is at the bottom. Not only does it take more energy to extract but you get less energy out of it.
So whenever you get to the point when it takes the energy of 100 barrels of oil to extract 100 barrels youre wasting your time, and wasting oil!
NicosMind 1 year ago 48
@NicosMind ha, nice comment. How are they getting access to the tar sands then?
robertklein2000 1 year ago
@robertklein2000 Tar sands arent oil wells. They havent had to drill through x miles of rock, then pressurize the well(not always a must) plus consume as much water as you get oil out of the ground. Did you know that we've basically got to the point where humans demand for water to drink, bathe, water plants etc is equalling the demand for water to pump oil? Like in Saudi Arabia? So the rate at which we pump oil will eventually have to slow unless we want to cause deaths by drought.
NicosMind 1 year ago
@NicosMind You dah man (>_o) (^^^^)
UniversalVision 10 months ago
does take in effect of EPA not allowing us to drill. but i do agree with his point. start buying commodities!
motto775 1 year ago
I like this man he is trying to open people eyes= If you don't come to your senses nature will take control and force things to be in balance.
Unfortunatly I think people don't like to belive him it could force them to say no to themself.
I like nature and sustainable housing I haven't found many people who share that intrest with me.
But keep up the good work.
gunnhildur77 1 year ago
We will have feedback to work with.
There is such a thing as a census bureau and luckily population is closed-system meaning be are able to measure growth every year.
What I do agree with whole-heartedly is if we are negligent of these *facts* it will be considerably ugly.
Values need to change; those that are pro-life need to watch this video lol.
scout6686 1 year ago
@scout6686,
>> Values need to change; those that are pro-life need to watch this video lol.
-- Whether someone is pro-life or pro-murder has NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
-- Population reduction is not a conversation on this video. Slowing or reducing population growth is.
-- Reducing growth doesn't mean abort babies. You can reduce growth just by having people of the world have 3 kids or less. Yes THREE. Disease & famine will reduce kill off that 3rd "growth" automatically.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 Eventually there will be policy which limits children etc. I think we are still far from such concepts considering we have televisions about 20+ children families.
scout6686 1 year ago
-- My favorite part. So right.
2:24 "Don't believe any prediction of the life expectancy of a non-renewable resource until you have confirmed the prediction by repeating the calculation"
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
Although the message should be in a new bible, some of the points he makes are faulty. In the politician's statements, they are talking about maximizing self-sufficiency by using more US resources instead of foreign resources, obviously derived from the crises in the 70's.
bagruj 1 year ago
I hope we dont use our reserves until it runs out elsewhere. Its a safety Military factor. This is scary stuff for those countries who have huge populations and are tempted to attack their neighbor or the other countries who still have natural resources. When will they attack, at 2/3 bottle full?
CORPARANOID 1 year ago
Genious? He explained it in simple arithmetic.
I see a lot of confused and voluntarily blind people.
Any doubts we're fucked?
Try that as a thesis.
Forcado101 1 year ago
Bartlett's entire line of reasoning is flawed, for he conflates the idea of procurement with that of consumption. Notably at 2:49 and 3:19. He also injects loose corollary in a failed attempt to counter loose corollary. The man's not a genius, at best a decent salesman to impressionable minds.
tacoland2000 1 year ago
@tacoland2000 I am so impressed with your confidence that I'm dying to see your re-calculation of Bartlett's numbers, sans the flaws in his line of reasoning. When will we run out of coal? oil? Us impressionable minds are yearning for a better salesman.
PRIMEx420 1 year ago
@PRIMEx420 I'm sure you ARE yearning for a better salesman! The fact that even minimally educated skeptics deflate your demagogues must be irritating, to say the least. What numbers are you referencing? Because numbers without viable formulas are worthless.
"When will we run out of coal or oil?" you ask. You ask the wrong questions, assuming many stupid things. Humanity isn't some beast progressing on a linear (or even an exponential) trajectory. You are simple, so you love oversimplification.
tacoland2000 1 year ago
@tacoland2000 way to "yes u R" my sarcasm. zing! anyways, u seem minimally-educated enough, go ahead, deflate away. btw, name-calling is a poor sub for facts. u still havent pointed out the flaws in his reasoning, OR mine. if u really had something to say, u'd suggest the "right" questions to ask, vs
PRIMEx420 1 year ago
@tacoland2000 vs just saying that mine are "wrong". u're either a frustrated pseudo-intellectual or a genius above my understanding. however the latter wouldn't have bothered at all, while the former probably got hard typing
PRIMEx420 1 year ago
@tacoland2000 you have a point there ... but the statement of time magazine also is very vague ... it does not mention why we should mine coal as much as we can? and how mining coal at a faster rate would help us achieve self sufficiency.. it is safe to assume that ... humans mine coal to consume and not just to procure and "store it up" ... because ... whats the point in mining it and storing it up ... when coal is already safely stored in the ground ?
mintoo2cool 1 year ago
@tacoland2000
"... he conflates the idea of procurement with that of consumption."
Please illustrate what benefits the procurement of oil provides that are in now way associated with consumption.
"He also injects loose corollary in a failed attempt to counter loose corollary."
Please specify exactly what it is you believe he has injected that you regard as loose corollary.
x8z3 1 year ago
The question he poses: Are human beings smarter than bacteria on plated media or yeast cells in a warm bottle of corked fruit juice?? (every yeast population will grow exponentially producing carbon dioxide and alcohol from sugar until alcohol reaches 11% where they kill themselves off....with their own waste product...ethyl alcohol.)
Until humans can understand that "things that cannot go on forever generally don't".
poosta7 1 year ago 2
don't you believe a word of it. don't trust any of it. lies.
thepofmeister 1 year ago
who cares about volcanos you idiots. CO2?? who cares about that either??
water vapor is a much more insidious greenhouse gas. go out on a cloudy night and its much warmer than a clear night . youve noticed that right? the only way to cool the poor earth is to 1st get it hot enough to burn all this pesky water vapor off. eventually the empty ocean basins will provide arable land, and just think how easy fishing will be (at least till they rot.) oh and tsunami warnings will cease too.
extremetea 1 year ago
432,000,000,000/100,000,000 is4320 tonnes that each 'large' electric plant would use for the entire 800 years. lol divide 4320/800 and you get each of the 'large' hundred million (ROFL) plants consuming 5.4 tonnes of coal/year.
Of course, Forbes, Businessweek and such all cook up their data routinely to make the picture as rosy or as glum as the government tells them to. This is no surprise.
justaname5 1 year ago
hello
ytmaser 1 year ago
hi = )
scavenski 1 year ago
If it were true that individual volcanic eruptions dominated human emissions and were causing the rise in CO2 concentrations, then these CO2 records would be full of spikes -- one for each eruption. Instead, such records show a smooth and regular trend. The fact of the matter is, the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions.
picobravo30 1 year ago
@picobravo30 the records are absolutely full of localized spikes. These are easily observed and have been reported in every scientific journal I've looked at in the last 15 years that covered the topic at all. You have to know there is such a thing as a CARBON ISOTOPE to figure out the localization, to start. You're very very wrong. Global warming is a fact like gravity. CO2's role is a fact like gravity is a fact. Human CO2 emission needs accurate measure even now, so I'll let it go there
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
what scientific journals are you talking about exactly? can you please reference them for me as i am very very interested.. be as specific as you can..
picobravo30 1 year ago
Science, Nature, I've read a lot in the last 10 years. It's too much hassle to shove all the URL's here past the youtube filter. I'll save your message so I can get back to it. You can do the searching yourself even faster. If you're not willing, that's not my problem.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
wow you're amazing. How does it feel to be so all-knowing.. to never be wrong or ever have to doubt yourself? Don"t you ever worry that such absolute conviction in yourself might obscure other possibilities? can anybody be completely right about anything?
picobravo30 1 year ago
I'm not done searching. I DID FIND your quotation with a few words changed to mean the PRECISE OPPOSITE of your claim about volcanoes, showing they are no more than 1/150th of human CO2 output so far. I'm still searching. It's not about being all-knowing, it's about refusing fraud at every step and doing my due diligence homework.
It's about having no absolute conviction, only an absolute refusal of fraud.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
i changed nothing you fool.. and writing in CAPITAL LETTERS does absolutely nothing except prove to me that you're exactly what i think you are.. just another loud-mouthed know-it-all north american with shit for brains and way too much time on his hands.. you're a joke
picobravo30 1 year ago
you're a joke.
I actually have a science degree (computers).
Do you?
humans cause global warming. Period. Volcanoes are a small factor. The C14 isotope thing is still on my list of things to find. The c12/c13 ratio is what I found. Anyhow, joke's on you, happy travels Cap'n Chuckles.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
looks like all your study and reading hasn't taught you much.. read my original comment again my confused friend and you will see that you are arguing against nothing.. humans cause global warming- yes.. volcanoes are a small factor- yes... the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions... what don't you understand dumb ass? i've been in agreement with you the whole time.. your confusion has been pretty funny actually..
picobravo30 1 year ago 3
um.
Yes.
D'oh.
Well... I guess that's it
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@picobravo30 well why not just explain this to me shortly so i wont have to listen to all this id appreciate that
TrueDominguez 11 months ago
@picobravo30 global warming it was -27 in sudbury ontario canada last week ,not warm. at all.
ianfmazal 11 months ago
by the way sister (because you have been a bitch) you really should try to understand what someone is saying before you start rubbing sand into your pussy and getting all worked up like that.. you dumb ass
picobravo30 1 year ago
If you really have a science degree why do you have to boast with it? Is this your best argument? A degree in IT does not qualify you to be a climate scientist as well. Claiming something like "...humans cause global warming, period" end of discussion, does sound like it is so, 'cause I say so! Is this how you defended your thesis at the University? If you had been my student I would have kicked you out of my department,...period!
McDoulgham 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming. Volcanoes are a small factor.
==> Global warming a lie, a hoax, & part of a new religion, Scientists abandon WorldNetDaily com
650 to dissent at U.N. climate change conference
Dec 11, 2008
-- WASHINGTON – A United Nations climate change conference in Poland is about 2 get a surprise from 650 leading scientists who scoff at doomsday reports of man-made global warming – labeling them variously a lie, a hoax & part of a new religion.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• Warming fears are the "worst scientific scandal in the history ... . When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists." -- U.N. IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning Ph.D. environmental physical chemist.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 that is a fucking lie and you know it. That's OK.
I will ensure to personally kill, in the future, every person who is guilty of making the problem worse. It is my duty to human kind and to my own survival
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
==> Global warming: lie, a hoax, & part of a new religion, Scientists abandon [WorldNetDaily com]
650 to dissent @ U.N. climate change conference
12/11/2008
-- WASHINGTON – A United Nations climate change conference in Poland is about 2get a surprise from 650 LEADING scientists who scoff at doomsday reports of man-made global warming – labeling them variously a lie, a hoax & part of a new religion.
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 Whether it's some precondition to the apocalypse is another matter in itself BUT the problem needs to be fixed and policy enforced immediately.
We need to change our ways asap. I think at this point in type, with all that is going on, most people are aware that things aren't sustainable.
scout6686 1 year ago
@scout6686,
>> things aren't sustainable.
-- They're not sustainable AS LONG AS we're relying on non-renewable energy sources. Other than that California, USA has enough farmland to provide enough food for the whole world. They currently supply 65% of the worlds' food anyway.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 Your obviously not aware of the states *severe* water shortages which limits farming by a large margin.
scout6686 1 year ago
@scout6686,
>> Your obviously not aware of the states *severe* water shortages which limits farming by a large margin
-- There is plenty of water that can B channeled from the ocean. Salt water isn't harmful to crops. If we can make 1000s of miles of underground plumbing, railroads, roads, electrical cords, so can we with ocean water.
-- Also, ppl can grow their own mini-farms & w/ rain can produce enough for them & their neighbors.
-- Never will there be a food shortage. That's a myth.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 said "-- Never will there be a food shortage. That's a myth."
The Irish Potato Famine was a myth? The masses of starving, disease-infected, people in African 3rd-world countries are a myth? I think you know better and perhaps misspoke.
There don't have to be food shortages, but they do happen all over the world for various reasons. And a world-wide shortage of palatable food is conceivable under unchecked population growth.
vclxrr 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 Water isn't the problem. It's soil and oil. Take a geology course.
jimbobanalbeats 10 months ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 The fucktard is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
85Funkadelic 1 year ago
@85Fuckadelic,
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com is a Top 500 website, according to Alexa . com, the search and ratings agency affiliate of Amazon.com, and the No. 1 independent newssite. WorldNetDaily currently attracts nearly 5 million unique visitors a month and more than 40 million pageviews, according to its own internal monitoring software.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@85Fuckadelic,
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com was voted the most popular website on the Internet every week for nearly two years running between 1999 and 2001 on the independent, European-based Global100 . com.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@85Fuckadelic,
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com consistently ranks as the "stickiest" newssite on the Internet, meaning readers spent more time on it than on any other - including giants CNN, MSNBC and ESPN.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@85Fuckadelic,
>> The fucktard? is anyone who thinks worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
-- WorldNetDaily's unique and aggressive reporting style ...:
• WorldNetDaily . com often ranks at the top of the news pack in number of pageviews per user and minutes per page - two other important categories measured by Internet ratings agencies.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 Everyone who says global warming is a hoax is a mass murderer as bad as Hitler. All island nations are put at risk by global warming of being killed off due to rising oceans and killing ocean life due to acidification of the oceans. Mass murderers must be killed. Choose
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> Everyone who says global warming is a hoax is a mass murderer as bad as Hitler.
-- Okay. We'll all believe you LATER.
• "Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined." -- Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, PA.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
-- PWND AGAIN!
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It doesn't have open minds ... . I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists." -- Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the U.N.-supported International Year of the Planet.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming." -- U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 doubling the CO2 concentration will cause most mammals on earth to have cardiac problems and temperatures will rise high enough some places will simply stop having winter at all. Ever again.
You are the stupidest most ignorant and certainly most wrong human on the face of this earth. Shame on you and may your life be made thankfully short by the people you hurt. You are scum.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
-- 75% of carbon emission are from animal "emissions"
-- Global warming is a tool of elitists to help create a centralized government worldwide without borders which would end the middle class and create a global slave society ruled by our debtors.
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapor and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will." -- Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined." -- Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, PA.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense ... . The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning." -- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
• "CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another ... . Every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so ... . Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver's seat and developing nations walking barefoot." -- Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
-- It is 4 degrees Celsius (39 Fahrenheit) today in Poznan, Poland, where the U.N. conference is being held.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> humans cause global warming.
-- PWND!
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 YOU GOT PWNED.
The winter was so warm and dry that now we have a drought where I live. The temperature was above 0 C in December 3 times, one time overnight 8 C.
The global temperature measurements are ALL TOO HIGH and getting higher.
PWN ON YOU , award for being Always Right AGain for me. What the hell makes you such a tard? Your lies are still lies. The earth warmed FASTER than predicted, NO COOLING IN SIGHT. Rising oceans, death for island nations. Fact, Fact, Fact, Fact, fact
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7,
>> The winter was so warm and dry that now we have a drought where I live
-- Have you looked at the polar ice caps on Mars & Saturn lately how they've reduced? What PEOPLE caused that?
-- Internet class is over today. You're excused for being a FUCKTARD.
-- I rule. 4,934,344,322 people agree with me after posting this comment.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
@MikeSPx24bj9 So your stupid enough to think that your local weather has anything to do with the average climate of the world over a multi-year stretch?!! Yup its confirmed you are the fucktard now get back in class.
85Funkadelic 1 year ago
@85Fuckkadelic,
>> So your stupid enough to think that your local weather has anything to do with the average climate of the world over a multi-year stretch?!!
-- Are you sure what "your" saying?
-- I never said anything about local whether in all my posts all over the entire Internet since the first time I logged on. I never talk about LOCAL WEATHER ANYWHERE. What are you smoking?
-- My post was awhile ago. When you post you need to quote what someone else has sd, just as I have done.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ytgv3fc7,
>> The temperature was above 0 C in December 3 times, one time overnight 8 C.
The global temperature measurements are ALL TOO HIGH and getting higher.
-- Have you confirmed that prediction by repeating the calculation?
PWND!!!!!!!!!!!!
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
You WLL find many answers, with your approach.
As you say, you first have to detach yourself from all your normal loyalties, and just look at the facts, and come to a conlusion, totally impartially.
I have done loads of laymans research, and am HORRIFIED. History is altered to make murderers and thieves and liers, look like th egood guys.
They guys who murdered and enslaved your village, then wrote history books, telling you how nicely it all happened. And your ancestros cry, in graves.
mikeybrumbrum 1 year ago
FACT look it up climate change retards
Volcanoes around the world emit 130 Million Tones of CO2 every year
one volcano produces more CO2 in a year than all the man made CO2 in a decade
polar ice caps on mars is melting
sun is getting hotter as it realigns with galactic plan
geneticists finally proved black people the original humans, the white man is a genetic recessive gene emerging just 10,000-8000 BC
Skin cancer amongst whites have surged
white people are dying off
godscuttingyoudown 2 years ago
@godscuttingyoudown
I've never listened to a volcano, I didn't now CO2 was musical.
Humans emit BILLIONS of tons of CO2 each year. Volcanoes not nearly so much.
Who lives on Mars? more denialist cherry picking.
Galactic Plan ?! You must have missed your medication today.
geneticists (?!) .. so you have no real arguments, just trying to distract.
Skin cancer, white people .. what does this blathering have to do with climate change?
So not only are you delusional, but you're racist too.
Charlesincharge42 1 year ago
this old guy worked for GMC, no wonder he now teaches this non sense, all hes saying is that need to kill alot of people, they need alot of more oil, or else the whole USA economy will go to hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;
WHY DOESNT HE SAY USA USES 25 % OF THE WORLDS OIL, AND INFLATION IS PRODUCED THANKS TO MASS MEDIA AND COMSUMPTION, AND CALLING IT ECONOMIC GROUTH, AND WHY DOESNT HE GIVE ANY REAL SOLUTION LIKE RENEWABLE ENERGY, MAYBE BECAUSE HUGE INDUSTRIES WOULD LOOSE PROFITS, HMMM....
godonio84 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So this guy just said that previous oil figures were faulty; faked by the oil companies actually. Than goes on to say that the alaska oil is an estimate aka not accurate. But he has the nerve to say that this graphic is accurate. Even if it is based on the same oil company estimates as the last..
SovietSlayer 2 years ago
The extra -optimistic figures come from those interested in the NON development of alternative sources of energy.
shapein 2 years ago
This removes the need to believe whether global warming is man-made or not......consumer society is on an inevitable road to self destruction! I hope you're appreciating this golden age!!!
ooothatsinteresting 2 years ago 20
@ooothatsinteresting golden age :(
SC2nerd 1 year ago
@ooothatsinteresting energy crisis and man made anthropogenic global warming have nothing to do with each other
winnah2314 1 year ago
@ooothatsinteresting Golden age? I hope thats sarcasm. I don't think consuming the worlds energy as fast as we can before the end constitutes a Golden age, I think its an Age of Ignorance, and The 21st century will be looked at with shame in future years.
Steaksngainers 1 year ago 2
@Steaksngainers as does all other centuries
amosjohansen1 1 year ago
@amosjohansen1 thats highly optimistic, but i like it. :)
Steaksngainers 1 year ago
He is absolutely correct about the mathematics and the ignorance of the potential effects, but he does make some logical errors.
For instance, he repeatedly conflates the idea of drilling or mining with consuming. Drilling for reserves is not consumption. To prove out reserves, wells are drilled and then capped. That is not the same a consumption.
Great overall set of videos!
freedomsadvocate 2 years ago 4
Yes that struck me as odd. How long is a drilled reserve generally kept? I've never really wondered that before.
Furiens 2 years ago
@Furiens I would imagine that depends on the quality of the find, since that determines the final cost. The lower the quality (and thus the higher extraction/refining) the cost. More expensive would be kept offline longer.
freedomsadvocate 1 year ago
@freedomsadvocate big deal......whether it is or isn't classified as consumption, it is depleting the supply.....
djmusic111 1 year ago
@djmusic111 Minor point, but what I mean is that *extracting* oil is consumption and decreases supply. It is used up. Drilling and capping is not consumption. All it does is increase the size of proven reserves. It does not decrease the supply, since none of that oil is used until it is later extracted. Still a great set of video's... ;-)
freedomsadvocate 1 year ago
@freedomsadvocate
drills use oil as fuel, thus consuming fuel
keepyournoseclean 1 year ago 2
@freedomsadvocate You are the one who is making a very simple economic mistake. As a mining company, you don't produce surplus energy, you only respond to demand otherwise it devalues the value of what you are producing. You only produce so much as to meet the demand.
tugger 1 year ago
@freedomsadvocate
wrong. wells are not capped if they can produce.
Withnail1969 1 year ago
What is "overpopulation"? When does it accur? Oh, you don't know? ^^
Is it when you do not have enough food or is it when you don't have enough room for all the people or if you don't have enough room in the swimming pool or you don't have enough room room in a university?
Well, the "elite" decides who have enough and who don't... ; )
ThompsonXP 2 years ago
It is 11:59 and 1/2 right now.
Funny you should mention the 'elite', I think they're making lies and propaganda at an ever faster rate, because the common people are starting to wake up.
Charlesincharge42 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is fear mongering if I have ever seen it. This matter is a serious concern but this professor is using data which only benefits his calculations. He is still living in the 70's.
hershbergerpaul 2 years ago
we were taught these things back in the 80's. Eviromental problems and lack of fossile energy.
If this scares you already, I woulnd't watch Zeitgeist or Jim Marrs if I were you....
FakeNoMore 2 years ago
I just want to make sure it is clear that I'm not scared about this. It should be of concern "but" the law of nature will take its course and we will adapt.
hershbergerpaul 2 years ago
then why is this fear mongering? I thank those people who stick out their necks to what sound more to "realisation" to me. But, always check facts yourself...just like the professor said...
FakeNoMore 2 years ago
Haha! You are right, we will adapt. The key question is "how".
Tommyfmx 2 years ago
The law of nature will take its course ...
... meaning enormous casuatlies due to famine, diseases and war (like it has always been).
zupahzmurv 2 years ago
@hershbergerpaul Nature will take its course? Haiti is adapting to nature's course right now.
italianserge 2 years ago
from which year is this video?
NaRutO1304 2 years ago
Comment removed
mussedeq 2 years ago
Nature always wins... always.
vtbluedragonfly 2 years ago
This is not the truth!
This guys couse this problems and then offer a solution, that benefits only themselfs and couse more problems for others.
ThompsonXP 2 years ago
lol, what cave have u been sleeping in? Do your homework, and you'll see he is just giving facts. Besides, don't shoot the messenger for giving you bad news!
FakeNoMore 2 years ago
truth hurts. this is the truth.
sustainability is the future.
binoyrakesh 2 years ago
Exactly.
Check out Permaculture .. oops there goes the controlled centralized society :)
PS: Real Permaculture , like from the Australian Permaculture institute (Geoff Lawton)
Charlesincharge42 1 year ago
The auto industry will see a comeback when there is no gas to power the gas cars most people have.
baigandine 2 years ago
one or no child policy is the most peacefull version of a solution if you ask me.
Xabesroth 2 years ago