ammmmmmm no it isn't regular Wankel engine, the shape is realy different and combustion chambers are conected with each other... and i can tell that this engine is more efficient than simple Wankel rotary engine :)
Serial compounding,just like you did. I think it's unfair to state only the disadvantages of the device.The device has very many advantages.The rotor could be made smaller,and you would have a huge size to volume advantage,High compression ratio, better sealing, since seals are tangential to the chamber,and no chamber constrictions that plague the Wankel.Good Luck. Sorry I had to remove earlier comments due to some mistakes .(Cat on keyboard).
Great job on the animation. The device is not new however; It dates back to the early 1900. Look at Wolfington 1918 US patent # 1277018,Doyer US patent #3285189 (1966),Campbell #3967594. There are tons of the variations. I did a lot of research on the device,and almost made it my final engineering project before changing my mind. One of the disadvantages is that one would need some valves for a single rotor if a 4 stroke engine is intended, the way around that is serially compounding the rotor .
it looks like the most inefficient motor design...
sorry
born2stab 3 months ago
and machining for repairs? at a standard machine shop its basically impossible
Ryknfjor 3 months ago
hahaaha hell no.. this would not work
adam3176 4 months ago
Its wouldnt run,the compression is too sloppy, and it would vibrates itsself to bits,
it doesnt look like its efficiently doing the processes it should be doing, like a Mazda engine does.
KreatorOfDeath1985 5 months ago 6
are exhaust gasses evacuated completely? how are the valves operated/placed? lubrication? and when will you have a model?
art1618 6 months ago
looks like weird goggle eyes
Ultralphawolf 8 months ago
i wonder how they have mounted the crankshaft
bertineke1 9 months ago
And...thats based off your fully functional running prototype? Or is it based off assumption and computer software?
RotorMedic7 10 months ago
Looks like a standard ROTARY engine with 4 combustion chambers as opposed to a Wankel design that has 6 chambers...so why would yours be better?
RotorMedic7 10 months ago
ammmmmmm no it isn't regular Wankel engine, the shape is realy different and combustion chambers are conected with each other... and i can tell that this engine is more efficient than simple Wankel rotary engine :)
zimukassz 10 months ago
@r1ccardo yeah seems like there would be a balance issue but then, it is just a simple animation so probably not seeing the whole picture
zeppelin67637 1 year ago
it would find its way out way before 8k :)
sh3lbot 1 year ago
@r1ccardo are you an engineer?
LedKenji666 2 years ago
@LedKenji666 it looks to me it'd have issues with sealing...it seems from what i can see a pair of DKW pumps turned into engines.
dvdprui 1 year ago
design isnt impratical
Killazz77 2 years ago
i love my rotarys and i like the look of this good luck with it. would like one in my car if it goes well..
13bROT8N 2 years ago
Serial compounding,just like you did. I think it's unfair to state only the disadvantages of the device.The device has very many advantages.The rotor could be made smaller,and you would have a huge size to volume advantage,High compression ratio, better sealing, since seals are tangential to the chamber,and no chamber constrictions that plague the Wankel.Good Luck. Sorry I had to remove earlier comments due to some mistakes .(Cat on keyboard).
324Ben 2 years ago
Great job on the animation. The device is not new however; It dates back to the early 1900. Look at Wolfington 1918 US patent # 1277018,Doyer US patent #3285189 (1966),Campbell #3967594. There are tons of the variations. I did a lot of research on the device,and almost made it my final engineering project before changing my mind. One of the disadvantages is that one would need some valves for a single rotor if a 4 stroke engine is intended, the way around that is serially compounding the rotor .
324Ben 2 years ago
Comment removed
324Ben 2 years ago
Comment removed
324Ben 2 years ago
Comment removed
324Ben 2 years ago
Great job
324Ben 2 years ago