SUPER STEELERS!!!!! SUPERBOWL XIII WAS WITHOUT A DOUBT THE GREATEST SUPERBOWL I HAVE EVER SEEN!! HOW IN THE BLOODY HELL CAN THE COWBOYS BE CALLED "AMERICA'S TEAM" IN THE 70'S WHEN THEY ONLY WON TWO SUPERBOWLS WHILE THE SUPER STEELERS WON FOUR?! I HEARTILY AGREE WITH SUPERBOWL X MVP LYNN SWANN (#88) WHEN HE STATED: "WE WERE AMERICA'S TEAM IN THE 70'S SINCE WE WON FOUR SUPERBOWLS"! GO GET 'EM STEELERS!!!!
I thought this video was about all the super bowls in 70's... ¬¬ well, i'm a spanish cowboys fan but steelers was great and they still are great. Bradshaw is an underrated Qb
Football has supposedly progressed, but we've been reduced to a ball pinned against a guy's helmet and calling that the greatest Super Bowl catch? Watch Swann's catch on the sideline in Super Bowl X, the same game as the juggling catch they showed. it's even better. Swann did this shit in the 70s. I kind of liked watching him jump over cars too.
I'm a Dallas Cowboys fan since 1970 and have enjoyed 5 Super Bowl victories. However, there is simply no denying that the Steelers of the 1970's, is without question.....THE GREATEST TEAM EVER
@gf19711 I said nothing about the other teams, so how does that make me a dumbass? Fuck you, you derelict piece of shit. Publicized sports and their history is a joke.
@Ivantheterrible666 Because you very incorrectly insinuated the Steelers were the only team at the time with players on the juice, dipshit. Figure it out.
@gf19711 Incorrectly insinuated? I did no such thing... you just assumed that because the Steelers were the subject. You took that way out of context and committed an argumentative fallacy. I never said "ONLY THE STEELERS TOOK ROIDS OTHER TEAMS IZ GEWD," did I? No, I INSINUATED that the Steelers of the 70's were not the greatest teams ever, and now you look foolish for falsely restating my argument.
@gf19711 Spin it? LMAO dude read what you said... how hilarious. I never once mentioned another team, but somehow, you are saying that I did. The simple fact of the matter is that I am correct about the matter of you committing a reductive fallacy. Now please, relog on your steelergold1 account and trash talk me there.
@gf19711 I didn't even say their name lmfao. I wasn't even talking to your stupid ass, you dumb faggot. Your logic is by leaps and bounds below that of anyone I have ever met. I am not now, nor have I at any time said that the steelers were the only teams taking steroids. I am not now, nor have I INSINUATED that the steelers were the only team taking steroids. You are overly defensive, and now, I'm going to end this conversation. Don't get upset because 4 of your teams trophies are tainted.
@gf19711 Dude, stop using two profiles. I know that you're just logging on the other name to troll me while using this one to try and sound rational in order to bring me down. It's really pathetic... and your use of logic is shameful. Please, get real sister. I never said any of the things that you claim I did. You should be down right embarrassed at your inaccuracy.
@gf19711 Two profiles or not, you have no clue what yo ar talking about. Maybe you can fool others, but not me. I'm an english major, and I know how to conduct myself in an argument. You jumped the gun and committed a fallacy - You lose. End of story.
@Ivantheterrible666 It's been my experience that whenever someone starts to brag about their academic credentials, it's a sure sign they're actually lacking intellectually and are insecure about it. Fact remains you clearly insinuated that the Steelers were the only team in the league in the '70s that juiced, and further reinforced that insinuation by calling the four Super Bowls they won during that period "tainted." Now go away already, kid, you bother me.
@gf19711 It's obvious that other teams from back then juiced BESIDES the steelers. You jumped to a conclusion, and now you're too prideful to admit that you have done so. Also, I'm not a "kid," and you're the one who bothered me in the first place. Another set of fallacies thrown at me by you; although it's not like I wasn't expecting something of the kind.
@gf19711 Their four superbowls were tainted, as well as many other teams' are, and I never CLEARLY said anything except for that they juiced. Fact of the matter is that they are well known for having juiced, as well as many other teams from that era are, and it may in some way stain the legacy. It's you interpretation of what I said and not an insinuation. You speak from "your experience" which is showing me that you choose to see things from only your perspective.
@Ivantheterrible666 First of all the entire NFL was on sterioids in the 70s so the playing field was even because they were not illegal. Plus, the steroids the Steelrs used were cortizone to heal faster and not anabolic to make one bigger, faster asd stronger.
The Steelers were actually considerd smaller for their day as they relied on quickness instead of power and none of the players 40 times increased in the Pros from college.
IvantheF'nMoron- Ah Excuse me but your dead wrong in your assumption ab out the Steelers. Just hate to break the news, but ESPN along with the NFL Channel, then backed up by Sports Illustrated named the 70's Steelers over not just 1 but for a 10 Yr Period are hands down the Greatest Dynasty in the History of the NFL
The Show aired only 3 weeks ago on ESPN. Sports Illustrated with Votes from the Top Pros from yesterday & today echoed the Same. Oh wait, so sorry, almost forgot you know better
@SteelerGold1 ESPN, SI, and the NFL do not space themselves from the steroid era and I wouldn't either if I were them. It's detrimental to the sport and to the fanbase of the sport as a whole to undermine the body of work produced by histories great athletes. I'm not saying the steelers of the 70's weren't great teams, but I don't think that they were the gretest teams. Now get off of your fucking high horse and go write some more lies in your profile.
IvantheTheFuckingMoron Lies? Lies you say? Well then how about a WAGER? Theres a firm on line that will take bets from individuals in a Utmost Secure manner. Now that i have that out of the way, lets agree on a Wager that ALL the info i gave in my previous Post is Truthful & accurate. Here, i'll make this interesting-- My $5,000 to your $500.00. Great odds huh? You see, I'm calling your Out on your remarks, unless of course you are the GIANT PUSSY I think you are. WELL? I said WELL? PUSSY OR?
IvantheAssHole. Dearest Chimp, you do realize you can buy a back copy containing the Article I posted, or would you rather Bury your head in the proverbial sand. Regarding what ESPN aired on the Subject, you can always call them direct and request a DVD from them Regarding Lies in my Profile as you say, again that comes under the category of WAGER. Are you reading to back up your accusation, or will you PUSSY out? In other words, are you ready to back up your words like a REAL MAN, Or a PUSSY?
IvantheIDIOT- TRANSLATION: I'm done with you meaning, i Realize i'm way out of my league when it comes to matching Intellect. Also, its the easiest way out to save face, I understand Little man, I understand. At least i give you credit for having enough smarts to know when you've been destroyed. BTW: You are number 212 in terms of the tube members who dared take on the Supreme Master, who went the same way you just did. GAME--SET--MATCH. Just another conquest. BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LOL LOVE IT!!!
IvantheIdiot PS: No one was remotely close when it came down to a Vote by the Pro's. Some of the very best to play the game. Regards the Sports Illustrated article, it was in the May Edition, 2010, Pages, 78 & 79. After reading a number of your posts, i have come to the conclusion, you know less than JACK SHIT about the game. You see, i can say that, with good reason. Care to know why, dickhead? You see, i deal in FACTS, you, Conjecture Coupled with JEALOUSY. Bring it on As i will HUMILIATE you
dude, i can give the rothlesberger a pass on the first time. but, twice is suspicious. it is obvious he needs to mature quickly. he may be a great QB but, his life's decision making sucks the big one.
@002less was it proven? (NO) 2 girls say he did and nether of them can prove it ...sounds a little fishy when nether one can prove it or even make a case so it goes to court ...so do the math.. 2 girls accuse a man of rape + a man with a lot of money+ether girl can prove he did it =he was falsely accused
@TheSteelersrock--Rothelberger is classless. It's a surprise that the Rooneys, classly people, have kept him in the team. In fairness to Rothlesberger, he isn't the only athlete guilty of sexual indiscretions, but that doesn't give him a pass.
at 3:09 he says los angles rams...i thought it was st.louis..?
bloodonmykill 3 days ago
@bloodonmykill no before the rams changed to st.louis they was LOS ANGELES RAMS
javier40856 1 day ago
SUPER STEELERS!!!!! SUPERBOWL XIII WAS WITHOUT A DOUBT THE GREATEST SUPERBOWL I HAVE EVER SEEN!! HOW IN THE BLOODY HELL CAN THE COWBOYS BE CALLED "AMERICA'S TEAM" IN THE 70'S WHEN THEY ONLY WON TWO SUPERBOWLS WHILE THE SUPER STEELERS WON FOUR?! I HEARTILY AGREE WITH SUPERBOWL X MVP LYNN SWANN (#88) WHEN HE STATED: "WE WERE AMERICA'S TEAM IN THE 70'S SINCE WE WON FOUR SUPERBOWLS"! GO GET 'EM STEELERS!!!!
MsKeith1969 3 weeks ago
I thought this video was about all the super bowls in 70's... ¬¬ well, i'm a spanish cowboys fan but steelers was great and they still are great. Bradshaw is an underrated Qb
dabyd1304 3 weeks ago
Football has supposedly progressed, but we've been reduced to a ball pinned against a guy's helmet and calling that the greatest Super Bowl catch? Watch Swann's catch on the sideline in Super Bowl X, the same game as the juggling catch they showed. it's even better. Swann did this shit in the 70s. I kind of liked watching him jump over cars too.
mrrusss 1 month ago
Wow, i was a cowboy fan, but no one had an arm like Bradshaw........
lendljr 1 month ago
AWESOME!!!! ROCK ON!!!!!!
MrMegaFredzeppelin 1 month ago
best vidieo ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mataflower 1 month ago
With exceptions of course
dirtyrussianspy 1 month ago
The number 12 is the number of the elite quarterbacks
dirtyrussianspy 1 month ago
There were 2 Super Bowl 13's in your video
atomicgorillalover 2 months ago
Comment removed
spamchuckerjones 3 months ago
jack ham, jack lambert ,len swan, franco , bradshaw, and joe green beast players for steelers and one els know any more?
TheGreenbeanman 4 months ago
why is it all steelers?
MegaGboys 4 months ago
@MegaGboys 70s were the steelers prime years they were the patriots times five
xXZOMBIE666Xx 4 months ago
I'm a Dallas Cowboys fan since 1970 and have enjoyed 5 Super Bowl victories. However, there is simply no denying that the Steelers of the 1970's, is without question.....THE GREATEST TEAM EVER
3ringsAIKMAN 4 months ago
@3ringsAIKMAN Except for the fact that they juiced..
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 Right along with every other team in the league at the time, dumbass...
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 I said nothing about the other teams, so how does that make me a dumbass? Fuck you, you derelict piece of shit. Publicized sports and their history is a joke.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 Because you very incorrectly insinuated the Steelers were the only team at the time with players on the juice, dipshit. Figure it out.
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 Incorrectly insinuated? I did no such thing... you just assumed that because the Steelers were the subject. You took that way out of context and committed an argumentative fallacy. I never said "ONLY THE STEELERS TOOK ROIDS OTHER TEAMS IZ GEWD," did I? No, I INSINUATED that the Steelers of the 70's were not the greatest teams ever, and now you look foolish for falsely restating my argument.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 Riiiight. Way to spin it.
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 Spin it? LMAO dude read what you said... how hilarious. I never once mentioned another team, but somehow, you are saying that I did. The simple fact of the matter is that I am correct about the matter of you committing a reductive fallacy. Now please, relog on your steelergold1 account and trash talk me there.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 You didn't HAVE to explicitly mention another team. That's how insinuation works. Brush up on your logic some more.
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 I didn't even say their name lmfao. I wasn't even talking to your stupid ass, you dumb faggot. Your logic is by leaps and bounds below that of anyone I have ever met. I am not now, nor have I at any time said that the steelers were the only teams taking steroids. I am not now, nor have I INSINUATED that the steelers were the only team taking steroids. You are overly defensive, and now, I'm going to end this conversation. Don't get upset because 4 of your teams trophies are tainted.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 Yawn...
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 Dude, stop using two profiles. I know that you're just logging on the other name to troll me while using this one to try and sound rational in order to bring me down. It's really pathetic... and your use of logic is shameful. Please, get real sister. I never said any of the things that you claim I did. You should be down right embarrassed at your inaccuracy.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 Two profiles? Paranoia will destroy ya. LOL
gf19711 3 months ago
@gf19711 Two profiles or not, you have no clue what yo ar talking about. Maybe you can fool others, but not me. I'm an english major, and I know how to conduct myself in an argument. You jumped the gun and committed a fallacy - You lose. End of story.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 It's been my experience that whenever someone starts to brag about their academic credentials, it's a sure sign they're actually lacking intellectually and are insecure about it. Fact remains you clearly insinuated that the Steelers were the only team in the league in the '70s that juiced, and further reinforced that insinuation by calling the four Super Bowls they won during that period "tainted." Now go away already, kid, you bother me.
gf19711 3 months ago
Comment removed
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@gf19711 It's obvious that other teams from back then juiced BESIDES the steelers. You jumped to a conclusion, and now you're too prideful to admit that you have done so. Also, I'm not a "kid," and you're the one who bothered me in the first place. Another set of fallacies thrown at me by you; although it's not like I wasn't expecting something of the kind.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@gf19711 Their four superbowls were tainted, as well as many other teams' are, and I never CLEARLY said anything except for that they juiced. Fact of the matter is that they are well known for having juiced, as well as many other teams from that era are, and it may in some way stain the legacy. It's you interpretation of what I said and not an insinuation. You speak from "your experience" which is showing me that you choose to see things from only your perspective.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
@Ivantheterrible666 First of all the entire NFL was on sterioids in the 70s so the playing field was even because they were not illegal. Plus, the steroids the Steelrs used were cortizone to heal faster and not anabolic to make one bigger, faster asd stronger.
The Steelers were actually considerd smaller for their day as they relied on quickness instead of power and none of the players 40 times increased in the Pros from college.
pricepittsburgh 1 month ago
@gf19711 Then every SB in the 70s and early 80s are tainted so don't watch the NFL
pricepittsburgh 1 month ago
@pricepittsburgh Great logic. \sarcasm
gf19711 1 month ago
@gf19711 It must hurt to be wrong
pricepittsburgh 1 month ago
@pricepittsburgh Not nearly as painful as being a dumbass, which you obviously are.
gf19711 1 month ago
@gf19711 That's original. Did you come up with the insult dumbass yourself?
pricepittsburgh 1 month ago
@Ivantheterrible666 As an English major, you are aware that English is supposed to be captilized. Right?
alishaba909 3 months ago
@alishaba909 Yes, I think that is well known. Thank you dearly for your input; clearly no greater contribution has been made to this debacle.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
IvantheF'nMoron- Ah Excuse me but your dead wrong in your assumption ab out the Steelers. Just hate to break the news, but ESPN along with the NFL Channel, then backed up by Sports Illustrated named the 70's Steelers over not just 1 but for a 10 Yr Period are hands down the Greatest Dynasty in the History of the NFL
The Show aired only 3 weeks ago on ESPN. Sports Illustrated with Votes from the Top Pros from yesterday & today echoed the Same. Oh wait, so sorry, almost forgot you know better
SteelerGold1 3 months ago
@SteelerGold1 ESPN, SI, and the NFL do not space themselves from the steroid era and I wouldn't either if I were them. It's detrimental to the sport and to the fanbase of the sport as a whole to undermine the body of work produced by histories great athletes. I'm not saying the steelers of the 70's weren't great teams, but I don't think that they were the gretest teams. Now get off of your fucking high horse and go write some more lies in your profile.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
IvantheTheFuckingMoron Lies? Lies you say? Well then how about a WAGER? Theres a firm on line that will take bets from individuals in a Utmost Secure manner. Now that i have that out of the way, lets agree on a Wager that ALL the info i gave in my previous Post is Truthful & accurate. Here, i'll make this interesting-- My $5,000 to your $500.00. Great odds huh? You see, I'm calling your Out on your remarks, unless of course you are the GIANT PUSSY I think you are. WELL? I said WELL? PUSSY OR?
SteelerGold1 3 months ago
IvantheAssHole. Dearest Chimp, you do realize you can buy a back copy containing the Article I posted, or would you rather Bury your head in the proverbial sand. Regarding what ESPN aired on the Subject, you can always call them direct and request a DVD from them Regarding Lies in my Profile as you say, again that comes under the category of WAGER. Are you reading to back up your accusation, or will you PUSSY out? In other words, are you ready to back up your words like a REAL MAN, Or a PUSSY?
SteelerGold1 3 months ago
@SteelerGold1 lmao you're a fuckin pathetic loser. I'm done with you... you're probably mentally ill and for that, I feel sorry for you. Good bye.
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
IvantheIDIOT- TRANSLATION: I'm done with you meaning, i Realize i'm way out of my league when it comes to matching Intellect. Also, its the easiest way out to save face, I understand Little man, I understand. At least i give you credit for having enough smarts to know when you've been destroyed. BTW: You are number 212 in terms of the tube members who dared take on the Supreme Master, who went the same way you just did. GAME--SET--MATCH. Just another conquest. BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LOL LOVE IT!!!
SteelerGold1 3 months ago
IvantheIdiot PS: No one was remotely close when it came down to a Vote by the Pro's. Some of the very best to play the game. Regards the Sports Illustrated article, it was in the May Edition, 2010, Pages, 78 & 79. After reading a number of your posts, i have come to the conclusion, you know less than JACK SHIT about the game. You see, i can say that, with good reason. Care to know why, dickhead? You see, i deal in FACTS, you, Conjecture Coupled with JEALOUSY. Bring it on As i will HUMILIATE you
SteelerGold1 3 months ago
@SteelerGold1 My posts say nothing about football... so please, go ahead and expell your wealth of knowledge to me. Lmao #Biased steelersfan
Ivantheterrible666 3 months ago
pitts suits look like piss yellow!!!
fasteddy007 4 months ago
@fasteddy007 thats not what your mom said.
wes6ify 3 months ago
Why are a number of you talking about Big Ben here, when the video is about the 4 SB wins?? Are you that freakin Weak? Buy a clue asswipes
SteelerGold1 4 months ago
IN LESS THAN TEN YEARS THEY WINFOUR SUPERBOWLS GOOOOOO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!:)
BUMBLEBEEYEAR3 6 months ago
dude, i can give the rothlesberger a pass on the first time. but, twice is suspicious. it is obvious he needs to mature quickly. he may be a great QB but, his life's decision making sucks the big one.
002less 1 year ago
minnesoda?
Rhezoloution 1 year ago
hey why would you want him to go jail hes the only really good qb we have well better then dixon
smithsonion71992 1 year ago
great video.... go steelers.... rothlesberger go to hell you sex offender
002less 1 year ago 2
@002less was it proven? (NO) 2 girls say he did and nether of them can prove it ...sounds a little fishy when nether one can prove it or even make a case so it goes to court ...so do the math.. 2 girls accuse a man of rape + a man with a lot of money+ether girl can prove he did it =he was falsely accused
TheSteelersrock1010 1 year ago
@TheSteelersrock--Rothelberger is classless. It's a surprise that the Rooneys, classly people, have kept him in the team. In fairness to Rothlesberger, he isn't the only athlete guilty of sexual indiscretions, but that doesn't give him a pass.
TheMenghi1 11 months ago
@TheMenghi1 he was never proven guilty so to me if no one can prove your guilty then you must not be thats how i see it .
TheSteelersrock1010 11 months ago
This is one kick ass team
EricCarrForever 2 years ago