@johngotti68 Considering the fact that you made the name soccer, dickhead, I wouldn't tell us we're stupid for calling it the same thing. Congrats for being an idiot.
It´s good to see you in the north trying too play soccer. but that ball is not for that kind of match. you were playin´ in a "five men field" or "in door". The ball has to be more little and a bit heavier . there are special ones made for this kind of matchs. Any way keep trying have fun
you cant compare soccer to basketball. you have to be much more athletic to play soccer then basketball. look at your most athletic player lebron james and now compare him to leonel messi. or kobe bryant to cristiano ronaldo. soccer players are far more advanced.
@taha32 not quite. basketball players need to be tall. your average point guard would be considered a tall football player, while the tallest of footballers are only average in height in terms of basketball. when you factor in the size and weight of basketball players, than you realize that they are much more athletic than football players of the same height. basketball is unique because it requires extreme height to go along with either strength, quickness or athleticism.
@taha32 I am generally with you here but you have to consider the fact that a 2.00 meter person struggles way much more than a 1.80m to be athletic. The center of gravity is way too high. If you take players like d wade lebron james. Just imagine the height/athleticism ratio. But yes when we are talking about Ronaldo or messi we are deffinitelly in another level.
tbh basketball is all about being agile, having a very very good condition (you know when you actually play basketball) and the court vision is one of the most important things so I think your argument is invalid
I would say that soccer players are generally more "skilled" than basketball players. Size and physicality goes a looooong way in basketball. Any athletic, coordinated person who is over 7" tall can be a good basketball player. Nearly every player on the pitch in soccer has excellent control of the ball. Shaq, one of the best players in the NBA, has a free throw percentage of 54%! With enough practice, I'm pretty sure I could do better than that.
100 meters, highjump, lonjump, tripplejump, weightlifting.....and so on...what do you think. Best of the both worlds wor each sport you can come up with.
I´d put my money on basketballplayers hands down...
ok please everyone understand, henry tried to nutmeg him (put the ball through his legs) but it didnt work... baron david had no clue where the ball was...
BUT in saying that, he did tackle a million dollar footballer so he must of done something right..
lol the game was a joke, he let davis have it... but i think there is no question basketball players are better athelets then soccer. The only thing a soccer plaer may have on a baskketball player is stamina, and even that is debatable
i agree basketball players are better atheletes. most of it is about pure force. in soccer most players have to be intelligent morr so than atheletes. and infact if you are more ripped it slows you down. u have 2 b smart because of the size of the field. dictate pace of the game, players decide the tactics etc
?? No way man, there is no characteristic bar jumping that a basketball player has over a soccer player, theyre faster, stronger, fitter, more agile, and the vision and awareness needed for football is a at a much higher level then it is in basketball. I like both sports though.
i rly cant believe u just said soccer players r stronger, thats probably one of the dumbest things u cud have said... google dwight howard or lebron james and then say that.. not only r those guys stronger but they r 6'9 and 7'1 much harder to be that wide when ur that size... agile, prolly about the same in the 2 sports i give the edge to babsketball but .... next post
w.e,, speed again too close foor every player that runs a 4.4 40 i can give u a basketball player.... and vision ahahah watch john stockton play nuff said
i know who they are, i go too america a lot, theyre big guys but they are plenty of players in football who are stronger. be that wide when ure that size? that is complete rubbish, its impying the shorter u r the easier it is to be more muscular and stocky. no sense there. just go search some basketball players and some footballers pics and ull see, no question,look at the physiques,there exceptions but overall footballers are stronger and in better shape. kobe even comments on it in one video.
@kwakai that is not true
iRunner15 3 months ago
Too many players for such a small field.
amjan 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oh its not called soccer its FOOTBALL we invenetd the game (english) and use are name for it u fatt american basterd
johngotti68 1 year ago 5
its not soccer dickhead its football,
johngotti68 1 year ago 18
@johngotti68 its in new york, its soccer
wade2bosh 1 year ago
@johngotti68 soccer is a sub-branch of football. dickhead.
hmwillow 1 year ago
@johngotti68 Considering the fact that you made the name soccer, dickhead, I wouldn't tell us we're stupid for calling it the same thing. Congrats for being an idiot.
zer0ga 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@johngotti68 did you know that it can be either one? Or are you too ignorant?
MuckingBucket 6 months ago
@johngotti68 soccer!
thizizheat4ever 1 month ago
It´s good to see you in the north trying too play soccer. but that ball is not for that kind of match. you were playin´ in a "five men field" or "in door". The ball has to be more little and a bit heavier . there are special ones made for this kind of matchs. Any way keep trying have fun
sacamedeaca 1 year ago
you cant compare soccer to basketball. you have to be much more athletic to play soccer then basketball. look at your most athletic player lebron james and now compare him to leonel messi. or kobe bryant to cristiano ronaldo. soccer players are far more advanced.
taha32 1 year ago
@taha32 not quite. basketball players need to be tall. your average point guard would be considered a tall football player, while the tallest of footballers are only average in height in terms of basketball. when you factor in the size and weight of basketball players, than you realize that they are much more athletic than football players of the same height. basketball is unique because it requires extreme height to go along with either strength, quickness or athleticism.
montenegrin2010 1 year ago
@taha32 I am generally with you here but you have to consider the fact that a 2.00 meter person struggles way much more than a 1.80m to be athletic. The center of gravity is way too high. If you take players like d wade lebron james. Just imagine the height/athleticism ratio. But yes when we are talking about Ronaldo or messi we are deffinitelly in another level.
topografer 1 year ago
@kwakai
LeBron isn't fast? He runs a 4.4- 40 and he's 6'8. That's insane.
TheOtherView 1 year ago
tbh basketball is all about being agile, having a very very good condition (you know when you actually play basketball) and the court vision is one of the most important things so I think your argument is invalid
sznj94 2 years ago
I would say that soccer players are generally more "skilled" than basketball players. Size and physicality goes a looooong way in basketball. Any athletic, coordinated person who is over 7" tall can be a good basketball player. Nearly every player on the pitch in soccer has excellent control of the ball. Shaq, one of the best players in the NBA, has a free throw percentage of 54%! With enough practice, I'm pretty sure I could do better than that.
bluemarsss 1 year ago
what i dont get is why are you talking bout bball players on a soccer video?
and by the way soccer is way more conditioning and running!
kingballer19 2 years ago
100 meters, highjump, lonjump, tripplejump, weightlifting.....and so on...what do you think. Best of the both worlds wor each sport you can come up with.
I´d put my money on basketballplayers hands down...
thuga101 2 years ago
and footballers are faster, how can u question that, not too say basketball players arent quick.
chiliz999 2 years ago
son have u ever seen play allen iverson in the early 00's?
warrick82 2 years ago
mutu was there too :)
mrprettyboy23 2 years ago
failed ole by Henry lmao
DaBombastic7 2 years ago
Baron was forced to play out of position in that match; he's more of the box-to-box midfielder type.
otprice 2 years ago
LMAO!....he was wearing jordans while playing soccer LMAO!
shakman84life 2 years ago
Where was this?
What was this?
When was this?
How is this?
Someone explain!!! ahhhhhhhh!!!
brightlights456X 2 years ago
ok please everyone understand, henry tried to nutmeg him (put the ball through his legs) but it didnt work... baron david had no clue where the ball was...
BUT in saying that, he did tackle a million dollar footballer so he must of done something right..
taha32 2 years ago
lol the game was a joke, he let davis have it... but i think there is no question basketball players are better athelets then soccer. The only thing a soccer plaer may have on a baskketball player is stamina, and even that is debatable
dadackbutterproject 2 years ago
WOW! hang on i cant believe you even said that, vision of a soccer player is at minimum 100x better then any basketballer...
2nd soccer is faster.
3rd soccer is had a max of 3 subs with no drink breaks except half time so they must but fitter in every way..
quick question have you ever play soccer? i dont mean at the park with a mate im talking in a competition??
taha32 2 years ago
i agree basketball players are better atheletes. most of it is about pure force. in soccer most players have to be intelligent morr so than atheletes. and infact if you are more ripped it slows you down. u have 2 b smart because of the size of the field. dictate pace of the game, players decide the tactics etc
CapiTen10 2 years ago
@taha32 u said it best!!!
sencella 1 year ago
wow you really are fuckin dumb
N28Freestyle 2 years ago
?? No way man, there is no characteristic bar jumping that a basketball player has over a soccer player, theyre faster, stronger, fitter, more agile, and the vision and awareness needed for football is a at a much higher level then it is in basketball. I like both sports though.
chiliz999 2 years ago
i rly cant believe u just said soccer players r stronger, thats probably one of the dumbest things u cud have said... google dwight howard or lebron james and then say that.. not only r those guys stronger but they r 6'9 and 7'1 much harder to be that wide when ur that size... agile, prolly about the same in the 2 sports i give the edge to babsketball but .... next post
dadackbutterproject 2 years ago
w.e,, speed again too close foor every player that runs a 4.4 40 i can give u a basketball player.... and vision ahahah watch john stockton play nuff said
dadackbutterproject 2 years ago
i know who they are, i go too america a lot, theyre big guys but they are plenty of players in football who are stronger. be that wide when ure that size? that is complete rubbish, its impying the shorter u r the easier it is to be more muscular and stocky. no sense there. just go search some basketball players and some footballers pics and ull see, no question,look at the physiques,there exceptions but overall footballers are stronger and in better shape. kobe even comments on it in one video.
chiliz999 2 years ago
it is absolutly 100 percent a known fact that it is easier to be thicker when u are shorter... im actually kinda scared that ur saying it isnt
dadackbutterproject 2 years ago
shame on you henry
issah2 3 years ago
henry just let him have it lol
b3rs3rk 3 years ago
baron has some big ass feet
anchaelkee 3 years ago
because he plays basketball all nba players have big feet but you dont notice it until they are with non basketball players
vika01 3 years ago
can baron play for real? soccer i mean
winchester208 3 years ago
haha dang, baron davis got some d on henry. i wish i was there
xshawnyxboyx 3 years ago