Oh my God! What a master! An absolute master! As a pianist myself, I am hymbled by his performance! What great insight! what technique! Cortot had the reputation in his later years of being sloppy with his accuracy, But here we hear him with a flexible mechanism, breathtaking conception, towering intelect, a real force of nature! I'm so greatgeful to have stumbled on this. If you have any more like this, keep them coming.
Look, I'm only a younger teen, so I can't express what I feel fully like the people who have the top two rated comments, but I can say this: I love this piece, and I cannot wait for when my abilities qualify for me to be able to play this.
@sukinorules there's no greater praise one can give to composer than loving and wanting to perform his or her music! All best wishes with your piano studies.
always with Cortot one is aware of a razor sharp intellect at work. That coupled with his enchanting sound and poetic approach is what make him so great. I will also metion the incisive and sometimes even whiplash quality of his technique. For more proof listen to his Saint-Saens 'Etude en Forme de Valse' 1919 acoustic recording.
Cortot played the right notes in the wrong order but he was great in his interpretation unlike junk lin. The greatest Liszt exponent was Cziffra Gyorge and now Leslie Howard.
Awfully ugly comment! in my opinion Cziffra is the greatest Liszt performer along with Horowitz, and Jung Lin's Liszt is extraordinary. Cortot was also an extraordinary pianist!
BTW Jung Lin and Leslie Howard both played at the IKIF NY, all the videos are on YT, listen to her Mendellsohn and learn! Leslie sounds better recorded, but have to agree his CDs are incredible Liszt.
This manages to be so Hungarian, and played by this, oh, so rationalistic Frenchman, too. The man is loaded with pianistic sensibility to the gills, probably comes out of wine you could get in France at that time, these days you is SOL...
Sorry rontomcol... I wanted to agree with you and in my enthusiasm put the wrong vote !!! CORTOT is exactly what you say. He was also a pupil of Sophie MENTER, Liszt's pupil.... as he was a pupil of Emile DESCOMBES...CHOPIN's pupil...
what i like about cortot are the collours of his sound...he can play one piece over and over and never will be boring.....in comparison many many jung pianists with "superb" technique can bore me in 20 seconds...oh if they just listened a bit to those old masters the compeosers would also have better sleep in their graves...
This is the greatest and most fascinating performance of this I ever heard. What Cortot and several other of the great pianists had was the ability to weave a story; they created atmosphere and excitement from the first note.
I totally agree with you ! Something happens when he plays, he really has something to tell us when he plays, even if sometimes we don't agree on all points; Its better than technique and technique..
I like Rachmaninoff, too. In an interesting way, his recording is not unlike Cortot's: the interpretations are completely different, of course; but both are born of the romantic impulse to unabashedly inject one's personality into/over-the-top-of the music. Interesting also that they both composed a cadenza for the piece.
This performance leaves little to desire in terms of imagination, but I prefer Rachmaninoff's as well--the pianism is simply too incredible to resist!
Imagination, intelligence, nobility, virtuosity as a means of expression, honesty, so many colours... no barriers between oneself, the music one is playing and the instrument one is playing it on. This is what I hear when Cortot plays.
i completly agree with vincecharus.there are some great technicians and players out there today but musically everything is starting to sound the same.alot of these younger players are being programmed into thinking and playing alike no matter what school they come from or what part of the world.
Back in those days, everyone played differently, whether grandmasters like Cortot or music students or lovers.
Nowadays, with these circuits of competitions, recordings, concerts, etc., interpretations are standardized. If you don't play a piece adhering to a certain 'school' of interpretation, people think you're wrong. Instead of paying attention, people stop paying attention to your 'incorrect' interpretation.
In this sense, I think musicianship has gone backwards over they years.
yes. and above all the musicianship has gone backwards over the years in our communities..listen to the radio to current "pop" music..thats not very musically anymore, the most songs are monotonous and contain around 3 chords...
I think that musicians often distinguish between technique and musicality. Sometimes you can hear that in performances, but not in this one. With Cortot its always one big melting pot of feelings and seriousness, good and evil, love and melancholy... Bravo
It sounds like he considers every note a split moment before he plays it, adding a sense of "agitato" in a very romantic manner. Not so planned out; maybe flowing with his most current feeling of emotion.
One of the greatest pianists that ever lived. Supreme explosive musicianship full of freedom, excesses fresh ideas and fantastic playing, combined. His playing so unique, is intantly recognizable and impossible to imitate.
There was a lot of inconsistency back then in regards to tuning pianos, you had a lot of hacks out there that would tune the piano's higher register an 8th step higher than the rest of the piano, and in this recording you can really tell. This piano, unfortunately, is a victim of those hacks, and the recording suffers because of it.
God I wish I would have paid attention to who performed this on the tape I used to have of it. I never realized how may ways people could ruin this until I started searching it on YouTube. I liked Bugs Bunny's version better. Do what you want with the rest, but at least don't corn up the beginning, and give me a crescendo at that part at 1:00 where it obviously belongs.
Maybe you should pay attention to the recording...
1. It's distant.
2. It's old, and the dynamic range of the louder parts is limited; listen to the passages that should be loud and compare to the moderate passages, it's not that different besides the tone.
3. He does do a small crescendo at 1:00. Not only that, he changes tone, which is a definite indicator of dynamics.
Listening over the higher quality (128kbps) version again... I'm probably wrong on my 2nd point. There are parts where the sound clips/overdrives, which gives more evidence for that.
I think mrrusss was looking not for a "crescendo", but an immediate change in loudness, which happens to an extreme range in the Bugs Bunny cartoon.
Btw, there's actually a higher quality recording on YT.
Yes, I actually do agree the range may be withheld slightly, but I think that it was recorded with the best technology for the time, so it is exceptional compared to what some from the time period may have been. I think it is pleasant to be honest :)
Gorgeous, unique rendition! Cortot is phenomenal, what a discovery! I'd never heard him before youtube.. thanks for posting.
Never known for his technique? yeah I've heard it said that he made some fluffs, and you can hear some smudged notes but who cares? :) Anyway check out the rapidity of his repeated notes... improvised cadenza... leggiero passage work... sounds pretty amazing to me.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow did he fuck with ending. what happened to the alternating left and right hand octave 16th notes? too hard for him? listen to hofmann do it right. even maksim at least attempts to do it right.
In the score, Liszt indicates that the pianist is supposed to improvise the cadenza, which most pianists nowadays do not do-they just use the one that Liszt wrote down. Cortot was faithful to that performance direction. Go look at the score yourself.
Xianquik got that dead-on! I think what would be great is to play it exactly as written; then move into an 'interpretation' - by consolidating the two, all that were listening could see the flexibility of this piece, as well as the magnificence.
I like the way Liberace would integrate passages from this composition, with other powerful and resounding rhapsodies and concertos. Diane
the cadenza is a short, self-written section that pianists write to flaunt their talent. "Ad lib cadenza" does not mean "fuck with the ending. Cadenza and ending are two different parts. ad lib cadenza is heaven sent for virtuosos because it gives them the opportunity to write their own section to insert into the song. the best example of this is hamelin's cadenza. but main point is that the ending was written to be played, and the option to insert a cadenza has no bearing on the ending
the part from 8:00 to 8:58 is the cadenza. it's not in the score, check it out. that's the part cortot composed himself. the ending, on the other hand, is to be played as written after the (optional) cadenza.
I'll admit that some of the halting notes were just that - halting - rather than expressive, but I like the way that he pulled off the finale. When I listened to Horowitz I kind of felt jipped when it came to that part and when I listened to people like Maksim and Lang Lang I just felt totally repulsed and could actually SEE the lack of skills compared to the older pianists. I really enjoyed this despite it being such an old recording.
Peut-être ne saviez vous pas que Cortot était et reste le plus grand pianiste du monde ? technique transcendante, musicalité et lecture hors norme... Magnifique !
@almax154 C'est absolument subjectif ! Personne n'a entendu Chopin ou Liszt jouer, personne n'a entendu debussy ( excellent interprète de chopin paraît-il ) non plus.
How would Liszt would have want him to play? You talk to Liszt lately? Lol, to me his interpretation is beautiful: Cortot was really a poet, he looked for anything that was extraordinary...
Is the Cadenza actually written by Cortot, by the way? The same cadenza (transposed down a semitone) is featured in Franz Bendel's version for piano duet.
never read anything about Chopin´s anti-semitism, except for some contemporary internet blogger.. I read many Chopin biographies and many of his own writings and never found trace of it. Also his contemporaries never wrote about this. On internet there are bloggers who claim that even Mendelsohn was antisemitc !(he is jewish btw).
as a jew i hate cortot and all that he represent polyticaaly , but lets no forget that GOD gave him a gift,for us peopele to enjoy and appriciate,for me he is one of the great pianist/musicianes of the 21 century
Cortot also produced a Duo Arte roll version of this Rhapsody in 1927. The same year he demonstrated afterwards in playing live and by roll alternatively that it was almost impossible to distinguish with your eyes closed which was which. I first thought you took the roll too, but the strong background hiss and the limitation in dynamics is a sure sign of 78rpm disk being used. For those of you who dislike Lang Lang as much as I do: listen to Yundi Li instead. His Chopin is OK.
The 'limitation in dynamics' is the sign that this is a 78 over a roll? I think that a rather better sign is the beauty of cantabile and the audible variety of dynamics in the playing (despite the recordings quality). I assure you that I have heard very few piano rolls that are not easily identifiable by ear. Cortot is a pianist whose distinctive style suffers extremely badly on piano rolls. No roll captures his cantabile as genuine recordings do.
This interpretation is absolutely gorgeous! Alfred Cortot is still the best french pianist ever, I think. But let's not forget taht he was also a fucking nazi who collaborated
Great!!! On eof the most interesting version here in youtube.... modern pianists are so boring and dumb! Those few, but great, of the past will always be the best! Rachmaninov, Cortot, Fiorentino... that's almost all... Horowitz, of course, and very few more... Richter... Argerich.. I don't know! Lang Lang must fuck himself and keep practising!
I believe that practice is the last thing Lang Lang needs. He has such technical capability that all he dreams becomes sound reality...it's just so unfortunate that he uses those abilities to be a fucking goof. The man needs a real life, with real pain, with real love, with real mundainities; else, he'll remain a fucking goof
there are many, MANY pianists with just as good fingers as Lang Lang. technique has alot more to do with playing notes fast and loud. tone production, dynamic range, sense of structure colors and pedaling. he might as well be banging on pots and pans. i know that is harsh but he can console himself with his box office receipts.
Oh my God! What a master! An absolute master! As a pianist myself, I am hymbled by his performance! What great insight! what technique! Cortot had the reputation in his later years of being sloppy with his accuracy, But here we hear him with a flexible mechanism, breathtaking conception, towering intelect, a real force of nature! I'm so greatgeful to have stumbled on this. If you have any more like this, keep them coming.
pianoxpert 1 month ago
for sure one of the most important pianists of the 20th century
44STYLE187 8 months ago
what a lesson learned just by listening to his phrasing...
bummy33 8 months ago 2
驚きました!臭いを感じます。この臭いはいったい何の臭いだろう。
コルトーでなければ弾けない。
MeikoEgloff 9 months ago
Look, I'm only a younger teen, so I can't express what I feel fully like the people who have the top two rated comments, but I can say this: I love this piece, and I cannot wait for when my abilities qualify for me to be able to play this.
sukinorules 10 months ago 2
@sukinorules there's no greater praise one can give to composer than loving and wanting to perform his or her music! All best wishes with your piano studies.
rontomcol 9 months ago
so exiting
granadaredhouse 1 year ago
QUEL BONHEUR ......
etiam161036 1 year ago
always with Cortot one is aware of a razor sharp intellect at work. That coupled with his enchanting sound and poetic approach is what make him so great. I will also metion the incisive and sometimes even whiplash quality of his technique. For more proof listen to his Saint-Saens 'Etude en Forme de Valse' 1919 acoustic recording.
aardvaark069 1 year ago
I don't really like this piece much. It is too hammy. He plays it very well indeed, though!
cynic150 1 year ago
彼のこの演奏には、私の「テクニック」に対する概念を根底から覆されました。
これはもはや「ピアノの音」ではない。
これはこの作品の描くジプシーの楽団の世界そのものであり、そもそも「クラシック」という概念でくくってしまえない。
929bluebird 1 year ago
Cortot played the right notes in the wrong order but he was great in his interpretation unlike junk lin. The greatest Liszt exponent was Cziffra Gyorge and now Leslie Howard.
TheCourtwick 1 year ago
@TheCourtwick
Awfully ugly comment! in my opinion Cziffra is the greatest Liszt performer along with Horowitz, and Jung Lin's Liszt is extraordinary. Cortot was also an extraordinary pianist!
BTW Jung Lin and Leslie Howard both played at the IKIF NY, all the videos are on YT, listen to her Mendellsohn and learn! Leslie sounds better recorded, but have to agree his CDs are incredible Liszt.
Bret6464 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
imho this is the best interpretation of this piece to this day
sbubuzzolo 1 year ago
imho this is the best interpretation of this piece to this day
sbubuzzolo 1 year ago
Although the recording is kind of low quality, it still sounds amazing!
Eeli2008 1 year ago
Fantastisch gespielt. Und super recording zu der Zeit. 5*****
wickipere 1 year ago
what an incredible poet of the piano. his push and pull of the sound draws one in
123norenberg 1 year ago
This manages to be so Hungarian, and played by this, oh, so rationalistic Frenchman, too. The man is loaded with pianistic sensibility to the gills, probably comes out of wine you could get in France at that time, these days you is SOL...
fredericfranc 1 year ago
Forget the offer to download the cadenza. I got a load of casino spam and then the cadenza never appears only the excuse "file damaged".
daveA3535 1 year ago
Sorry rontomcol... I wanted to agree with you and in my enthusiasm put the wrong vote !!! CORTOT is exactly what you say. He was also a pupil of Sophie MENTER, Liszt's pupil.... as he was a pupil of Emile DESCOMBES...CHOPIN's pupil...
AllaBreve3 1 year ago
I hope Lang Lang could do something like this... I mean play a cadenza by HIMSELF, not always plays the Horowitz' version...
felix0911176727 2 years ago 7
Poetic sentiment not to be able to do composition power and mimicry though it is beautiful of what touch and free.
It is at a loss for words at this performance.
..Cortot.. through all eternity.
nyankothecat 2 years ago 2
what i like about cortot are the collours of his sound...he can play one piece over and over and never will be boring.....in comparison many many jung pianists with "superb" technique can bore me in 20 seconds...oh if they just listened a bit to those old masters the compeosers would also have better sleep in their graves...
bassann22 2 years ago 9
YES! Totally agree.
ongalexander 2 years ago
This is the greatest and most fascinating performance of this I ever heard. What Cortot and several other of the great pianists had was the ability to weave a story; they created atmosphere and excitement from the first note.
billyguns2 2 years ago 5
@billyguns2
i also like cziffra and hofmann on this :))
libetta 1 year ago
@bassann22
I totally agree with you ! Something happens when he plays, he really has something to tell us when he plays, even if sometimes we don't agree on all points; Its better than technique and technique..
pianopianissima 2 years ago
@bassann22 Cortot has complete control and understanding of his phrasing, whereas other pianists are concerned with 'sound' whatever that is..
acortot 1 year ago
Comment removed
takhirviolinest 2 years ago
I like Rachmaninoff, too. In an interesting way, his recording is not unlike Cortot's: the interpretations are completely different, of course; but both are born of the romantic impulse to unabashedly inject one's personality into/over-the-top-of the music. Interesting also that they both composed a cadenza for the piece.
This performance leaves little to desire in terms of imagination, but I prefer Rachmaninoff's as well--the pianism is simply too incredible to resist!
keenanonie 1 year ago
Imagination, intelligence, nobility, virtuosity as a means of expression, honesty, so many colours... no barriers between oneself, the music one is playing and the instrument one is playing it on. This is what I hear when Cortot plays.
rontomcol 2 years ago 14
Bravo !!.....
shela2 2 years ago 4
Superbe ! Quel merveilleux pianiste !
Iseutsachs 2 years ago 4
The beginning part reminds me of some Spanish melody.
ShinFuYux 2 years ago
beautiful 5 stars
Jtking3000 2 years ago 4
i completly agree with vincecharus.there are some great technicians and players out there today but musically everything is starting to sound the same.alot of these younger players are being programmed into thinking and playing alike no matter what school they come from or what part of the world.
bassshred37 2 years ago 5
Back in those days, everyone played differently, whether grandmasters like Cortot or music students or lovers.
Nowadays, with these circuits of competitions, recordings, concerts, etc., interpretations are standardized. If you don't play a piece adhering to a certain 'school' of interpretation, people think you're wrong. Instead of paying attention, people stop paying attention to your 'incorrect' interpretation.
In this sense, I think musicianship has gone backwards over they years.
vincecharus 3 years ago 44
Absolutely! That's why we music is mechanicallized also.
emrebozkurt800 3 years ago
No ! Lang Lang is very different ! LOL
Paulo78180 2 years ago
Different in a bad way. All glitter.
junglejim66 2 years ago 7
I cannot agree with you more!!
tawtsai 3 years ago
@vincecharus
yes. and above all the musicianship has gone backwards over the years in our communities..listen to the radio to current "pop" music..thats not very musically anymore, the most songs are monotonous and contain around 3 chords...
44STYLE187 8 months ago
@vincecharus Agree! Nowadays interpretations have become ¨"globalized". Everywhere people want to play the same way!
SEMPRELISZT 2 months ago
Marvelous interpretation! Bravo...
I think that musicians often distinguish between technique and musicality. Sometimes you can hear that in performances, but not in this one. With Cortot its always one big melting pot of feelings and seriousness, good and evil, love and melancholy... Bravo
Donluggy 3 years ago 2
Man I love it when richard kastle doesn't bash videos like this. A true interpretation with REAL emotion. It is very soothing....
magicfreak123 3 years ago 3
My favorite play on this piece. Beautiful rubatoes all the way.
AquaBlueNoemi 3 years ago 2
Jeez...what a unique interpretation. I loved it.
ffurgy 3 years ago 7
Come on! They should at least put a cutting point where the Friska starts!!
This is the first of Cortot I've ever heard. Marvelous details.
airad2 3 years ago
I like this original version more than Horowitz´s
elcosmopolita 3 years ago 5
Sounds like every note was considered. Amazing performance.
Saxopwnerer 3 years ago 8
Yeah, it's teeming with magic.
blakeada999 3 years ago 2
It sounds like he considers every note a split moment before he plays it, adding a sense of "agitato" in a very romantic manner. Not so planned out; maybe flowing with his most current feeling of emotion.
boomzxz 3 years ago 3
unico
raulraulius 3 years ago 2
One of the greatest pianists that ever lived. Supreme explosive musicianship full of freedom, excesses fresh ideas and fantastic playing, combined. His playing so unique, is intantly recognizable and impossible to imitate.
stephenTGV 3 years ago 5
I fully agree. You have in relatively few words exactly caracterized this wonderful musician.
cortor3652 3 years ago
There was a lot of inconsistency back then in regards to tuning pianos, you had a lot of hacks out there that would tune the piano's higher register an 8th step higher than the rest of the piano, and in this recording you can really tell. This piano, unfortunately, is a victim of those hacks, and the recording suffers because of it.
Purenicotine 3 years ago
Oh my god, didn't they have punkbuster back then?? Frigin cheaters with hacks oh my god!!
boomzxz 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Not computer hacks, you 12 year old imbecile. Like a hack, a so called "Perfect pitch tuner".
Purenicotine 3 years ago
The only comments you ever leave anyone are hostile. Lighten up a bit mate :)
boomzxz 3 years ago
I agree.
Purenicotine 3 years ago
Cortot, Cortot, Cortot....e ancora Cortot...!!!
dido93 3 years ago
I didn't realize that that part was the cadenza, I thought he messed up. :S
Now that I know it isn't, it sounds good. :)
NGS712 3 years ago
Did you hear that cadenza????
aldebussy 3 years ago
Stunning! Bravo! TY.
paulostroff99 3 years ago
God I wish I would have paid attention to who performed this on the tape I used to have of it. I never realized how may ways people could ruin this until I started searching it on YouTube. I liked Bugs Bunny's version better. Do what you want with the rest, but at least don't corn up the beginning, and give me a crescendo at that part at 1:00 where it obviously belongs.
mrrusss 3 years ago
Maybe you should pay attention to the recording...
1. It's distant.
2. It's old, and the dynamic range of the louder parts is limited; listen to the passages that should be loud and compare to the moderate passages, it's not that different besides the tone.
3. He does do a small crescendo at 1:00. Not only that, he changes tone, which is a definite indicator of dynamics.
RabidCh 3 years ago
I think you underestimate the technology.
boomzxz 3 years ago
Listening over the higher quality (128kbps) version again... I'm probably wrong on my 2nd point. There are parts where the sound clips/overdrives, which gives more evidence for that.
I think mrrusss was looking not for a "crescendo", but an immediate change in loudness, which happens to an extreme range in the Bugs Bunny cartoon.
Btw, there's actually a higher quality recording on YT.
RabidCh 3 years ago
Yes, I actually do agree the range may be withheld slightly, but I think that it was recorded with the best technology for the time, so it is exceptional compared to what some from the time period may have been. I think it is pleasant to be honest :)
boomzxz 3 years ago
man this guy had fast fingers!
matildamother69 3 years ago
This is great! rare document!!!
horowitzvs 3 years ago
Gorgeous, unique rendition! Cortot is phenomenal, what a discovery! I'd never heard him before youtube.. thanks for posting.
Never known for his technique? yeah I've heard it said that he made some fluffs, and you can hear some smudged notes but who cares? :) Anyway check out the rapidity of his repeated notes... improvised cadenza... leggiero passage work... sounds pretty amazing to me.
AlexPxr8 3 years ago
He plays the beginning of the Friska (2nd part) so fast that the rhythm sound like it's in cut time. Quite interesting.
Lontano 3 years ago
shrinkinggglasses the website you show for getting free sheet music is that horowitz virson?
Joe15980 3 years ago
No, it's just cortot's cadenza
shrinkingglasses 3 years ago
Cortot is the greatest pianist of th 20th century, nobody will never play Chopin, Shumann and Liszt like him. Besides, the poet os the piano.
bernardocarmopiano 3 years ago
you're forgeting Wilwelm Kempf.... Ouch
Alfencequinty 3 years ago
Thank you for mentioning Wilhelm Kempff who made som stunning Liszt recordings in the 1950-ies and 1970-ies (DECCA resp.DG)
cortor3652 3 years ago 2
I prefer Hofmann's version as well, but it's good to listen to other interpretations. Not everyone has to like the same version.
NGS712 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow did he fuck with ending. what happened to the alternating left and right hand octave 16th notes? too hard for him? listen to hofmann do it right. even maksim at least attempts to do it right.
whitepower6900 4 years ago
haha, attempts. cortot was never known for his technique! but his lyricism...
serox901 3 years ago
In the score, Liszt indicates that the pianist is supposed to improvise the cadenza, which most pianists nowadays do not do-they just use the one that Liszt wrote down. Cortot was faithful to that performance direction. Go look at the score yourself.
xiangyik 3 years ago
Xianquik got that dead-on! I think what would be great is to play it exactly as written; then move into an 'interpretation' - by consolidating the two, all that were listening could see the flexibility of this piece, as well as the magnificence.
I like the way Liberace would integrate passages from this composition, with other powerful and resounding rhapsodies and concertos. Diane
oldladyplayspiano 3 years ago
which part is the cadenza? i'm not good with musical terms.
matildamother69 3 years ago
the cadenza is a short, self-written section that pianists write to flaunt their talent. "Ad lib cadenza" does not mean "fuck with the ending. Cadenza and ending are two different parts. ad lib cadenza is heaven sent for virtuosos because it gives them the opportunity to write their own section to insert into the song. the best example of this is hamelin's cadenza. but main point is that the ending was written to be played, and the option to insert a cadenza has no bearing on the ending
whitepower6900 3 years ago 2
the part from 8:00 to 8:58 is the cadenza. it's not in the score, check it out. that's the part cortot composed himself. the ending, on the other hand, is to be played as written after the (optional) cadenza.
whitepower6900 3 years ago
Very interesting interpretation.
sab3156 4 years ago
I'll admit that some of the halting notes were just that - halting - rather than expressive, but I like the way that he pulled off the finale. When I listened to Horowitz I kind of felt jipped when it came to that part and when I listened to people like Maksim and Lang Lang I just felt totally repulsed and could actually SEE the lack of skills compared to the older pianists. I really enjoyed this despite it being such an old recording.
KazukiriMishamiota 4 years ago
interesante
necuhoctli 4 years ago
Hasta donde se y conozco ,a mi modo de ver, Liszt es , tras el gran Ludwig Van Bethoven el segundo más grande música que jamás haya existido
La interpretación es sencillamente lindando con lo sublime
Gracias
arsfilosofo 4 years ago
Fascinant...
Emlomor 4 years ago
je trouve cette version si différente de ce que j'ai pu entendre, si personnelle, et j'aime la façon personnelle dont Cortot aborde les oeuvres.
J'aime cette interprétation !! je le dit.
Bien sur, ce n'est pas la "bonne" manière de la jouer. Mais peu importe selon moi.
rhadamanthes82 4 years ago
Ben, tu crois que y'a une version officielle?!
K189T 4 years ago
Peut-être ne saviez vous pas que Cortot était et reste le plus grand pianiste du monde ? technique transcendante, musicalité et lecture hors norme... Magnifique !
almax154 4 years ago 2
C'était le maître de mon maître! ;)
godelike 3 years ago
qui était ton maître?
K189T 3 years ago
Jean Micault! ;)
godelike 3 years ago
connais pas, il est bien? :P
K189T 3 years ago
Très.
godelike 3 years ago
@almax154 C'est absolument subjectif ! Personne n'a entendu Chopin ou Liszt jouer, personne n'a entendu debussy ( excellent interprète de chopin paraît-il ) non plus.
Cthulhussama 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This version of the rhapsody of the rhapsodies hurts my ears!:S I think this is not the correct way to play this.
maci25 4 years ago
How would Liszt would have want him to play? You talk to Liszt lately? Lol, to me his interpretation is beautiful: Cortot was really a poet, he looked for anything that was extraordinary...
K189T 4 years ago
this is an old recording you jackass, thats why it doesn't sound that great
fantastic playing from Cordot though
RustyRagnarok 4 years ago
An old recording is not a problem at all. It mustn't prevent you appreciating the piece.
K189T 4 years ago
I think he fits more feeling in half of this piece than most pianists do in the whole thing. There isn't just speed in it. I like it.
pandawatch87 4 years ago
@maci25
this ain't mathematics child. there's no wrong or right way
libetta 1 year ago
Is the Cadenza actually written by Cortot, by the way? The same cadenza (transposed down a semitone) is featured in Franz Bendel's version for piano duet.
Nyiregyhazi 4 years ago
Statements about nazi/jews are hardly relevant. Chopin supposedly hated jews but that does not lessen my love for his music.
junglejim66 4 years ago
never read anything about Chopin´s anti-semitism, except for some contemporary internet blogger.. I read many Chopin biographies and many of his own writings and never found trace of it. Also his contemporaries never wrote about this. On internet there are bloggers who claim that even Mendelsohn was antisemitc !(he is jewish btw).
voolare 4 years ago
as a jew i hate cortot and all that he represent polyticaaly , but lets no forget that GOD gave him a gift,for us peopele to enjoy and appriciate,for me he is one of the great pianist/musicianes of the 21 century
and for that BRAVO CORTOT
jonatan871 4 years ago
this touches the soul
we all know our talk to god in a moment so alone
japidon87 4 years ago
Cortot also produced a Duo Arte roll version of this Rhapsody in 1927. The same year he demonstrated afterwards in playing live and by roll alternatively that it was almost impossible to distinguish with your eyes closed which was which. I first thought you took the roll too, but the strong background hiss and the limitation in dynamics is a sure sign of 78rpm disk being used. For those of you who dislike Lang Lang as much as I do: listen to Yundi Li instead. His Chopin is OK.
donthuis 4 years ago
The 'limitation in dynamics' is the sign that this is a 78 over a roll? I think that a rather better sign is the beauty of cantabile and the audible variety of dynamics in the playing (despite the recordings quality). I assure you that I have heard very few piano rolls that are not easily identifiable by ear. Cortot is a pianist whose distinctive style suffers extremely badly on piano rolls. No roll captures his cantabile as genuine recordings do.
cziffra1980 4 years ago
grande alfred!!..mi hai sbalordito...da te non credevo!
gianbattista83 4 years ago
This interpretation is absolutely gorgeous! Alfred Cortot is still the best french pianist ever, I think. But let's not forget taht he was also a fucking nazi who collaborated
IrritableChicken 4 years ago
Actually he was from Switzerland. And he indeed supported the Vichy regime, but his wife was of Jewish origin.
pianopera 4 years ago
Why shouldn't we forget? Because it's so nice and easy to be wise in retrospect? Fucking moron.
jo1u 4 years ago
Sorry, Cortot was never a member of the nazi party.
cortor3652 3 years ago 7
Is there an orchestal version of this great piece?
chopinalpiano 4 years ago
yes there is, you'll find it on Itunes store
IrritableChicken 4 years ago
There's a version here in youtube: watch?v=goeOUTRy2es
shrinkingglasses 4 years ago
Thanks for posting this. I've got this version on a 78rpm sp, but the edge is broken an I couldn't listen to about 30 seconds (15 a side).
StrivetobeDust 4 years ago
Great!!! On eof the most interesting version here in youtube.... modern pianists are so boring and dumb! Those few, but great, of the past will always be the best! Rachmaninov, Cortot, Fiorentino... that's almost all... Horowitz, of course, and very few more... Richter... Argerich.. I don't know! Lang Lang must fuck himself and keep practising!
abbjorko 4 years ago 2
I believe that practice is the last thing Lang Lang needs. He has such technical capability that all he dreams becomes sound reality...it's just so unfortunate that he uses those abilities to be a fucking goof. The man needs a real life, with real pain, with real love, with real mundainities; else, he'll remain a fucking goof
ProkofievRules 4 years ago 5
there are many, MANY pianists with just as good fingers as Lang Lang. technique has alot more to do with playing notes fast and loud. tone production, dynamic range, sense of structure colors and pedaling. he might as well be banging on pots and pans. i know that is harsh but he can console himself with his box office receipts.
brianCIM 4 years ago 3
thats NOT TRUE
who ever told you that is wrong
pianoking100 4 years ago
Priceless! Thank you.
snaaptaker 4 years ago
That's a great pic of Cortot.
mlleprufrock 4 years ago