i must admit im totally clueless about biology. . how do you know what side of the DNA ladder your sequencing. . you get a sequence, say ATCCTA, how can you tell if its that and not 1/2 the "right side and 1/2 "the left"??
Assertion city. Tell me what "older literature" that causes doubts about "sincerity of these authors", and I'll consider it. Science makes no attempt to pit itself against god, it merely seeks to explain the world naturally rather than supernaturally. So far, it seems to have worked out well. Wouldn't you say so, using a computer build on scientific principles and powered by a grid system that depends, among other things, on nuclear fusion, quantum mechanics and other "theories"?
Evolution has been a lie from day one, period. Some of the older literature have clauses that make you think about the sincerity of these authors. Its as if they knew of their own deception. The sad thing is that there has been an attempt to pit science against the bible, and the God of the bible.
The ultimate knowledge comes from God. It was He who made all things from the foundation. Before the any scientist discovered that the earth was round, Isaiah the prophet said so. Explain that one.
@Bobbyaf Isaiah may have heard it from the ancient greeks, who said it earlier (the atomic theory came from a greek philosophy: atomism)
You speak of honesty, but you prefer a book where human sacrifice is not only condoned, but encouraged (as is slavery and a lot of other fun things)
Nobody ever pit science against the Bible. it's just that science discovers facts that oppose the "truths" of the Bible, so theists take it as an attack,when none was aimed at no one.
@Bobbyaf The words of Isaiah say nothing of atoms. They are named atmos after the atomists (Atomos = smallest)
His words say nothing of a round Earth either. He said he could reach the end of it though (round Earth with an end...)
You first called about old authors that may have doubted about the truth of their work. I say older authors (religious texts) were so sure of themselves they taught illusions.
@Xgya2000 It didn't have to. Besides the name was merely philosophically based. It was not proven then. Isaiah called the earth a circle. Is a circle round? LOL...The expression "to the ends of the earth" is an expression connoting the idea that no one can hide from God. He's omnipresent. When we say our hands are tied, are they literally? No. Besides, why would any author be doubtful of their work after spending time doing it? Why be bothered? Makes sense to you?
@Xgya2000 Can history lie? Don't expect you to read with any accuracy what you don't understand. Besides, God forbad human sacrifices. What you call slavery was in fact a servant type like of service where those who served were paid and fed, which is typical of what you do for a living. Its either you're daft because I told you that Isaiah lived before the Greeks.
Since you're able to defend what others have written for you just say so and stop hitting on a history book.
@Bobbyaf What do you mean? DNA is a much more ancient text than anything one can make up for example, god. Just because you don't know how to read it, don't simply dispute it. Maybe you should read some science text books or journals, then you will know that religion is against scientific theory, not the other way around. Look in the mirror and wonder who the antagonists are.
I am a medical scientist so what are you saying? LOL....My understanding of what I have studied, doesn't support the lies of the theory of evolution. Life could not have conveniently come about by chance. That is bulls, and you know it.
@Bobbyaf a medical scientist that doesn't believe in evolution is an author that doesn't believe in printing. Evolution is a basis for everything and anything related to biology
Evolution has given so much to medicine, so much as to understanding how a previously well fought virus could fight off the medicine that once could kill it.
To anyone else reading my comments: Sorry for feeding the troll, but our "scientist" needs to learn some science.
@Bobbyaf: Isaiah says that god "sits above the circle of the earth". Jewish cosmology, in common, not surprisingly, with other Mesopotamian civilizations, projects the Earth as a flat circular disk (google it if you don't believe me), so there is nothing at all odd about this expression, although the idea of him sitting on the edge and dangling his feet over is a bit comic. A spherical earth model, though known to classical Greeks, eluded most of Christianity until middle age times.
Einstein pointed to the nature and origin of symbolic information as one of the profound questions about the world as we know it. He could identify no means by which matter could bestow meaning to symbols. The clear implication is that symbolic information, or language, represents a category of reality distinct from matter and
Because the symbol/meaning association at the heart of language is purely non-physical, there is no way that a purely physical interaction can create it. Information and language always arise from a mind that is not locked into the physical realm, and is able to step outside physical constraints into the world of ideas to form the abstract associations needed for a language structure to exist.
Evolutionists are backed up into a corner. The SCIENCE is on the side of Intelligent Design. What do they do? They RE FRAME the argument as one of "science vs. religion."
Richard Dawkins is a perfect example. After losing BIG in a debate against a Creationist at Oxford, he vowed to never debate another Creationist again. Instead he devoted his time to writing books and giving lectures about the "evils" of GOD and religion!
DNA is NOT "religion." DNA is scientific proof that God exists.
There is no such thing as one genus (KIND) evolving into another genus (KIND).
Evolutionists finally admit that. The problem is that they have not removed General Evolution Theory from the text books and are still pushing it on people via "suggestive" means. For example, PBS keeps running Evolution programs where they fail to clarify that humans have always been humans and animals have always been animals. They 'suggest' man evolved from animals.
Evolution is a scientific fact! it's not going anywhere!
Please give us the name of the Evolutionists you're talking about here who supposedly admitted Evolution is wrong, or is a lie.
WHAT!! There R 2 dozen transitional forms in our human branch, that spans from the most primitive 2 our present form!! And u have the gall 2 say humans were always humans???
If we were created fully formed, why do we have atavistic dna? Why vestigial organs? Humans grow tails in early embryonic stage!
I've seen some serious cases of denial before, but you're the worst!
I'm sorry if science is breaking your fantasy bubble, but u just need to mature, and deal with it!
The "invisible god did it" scenario is utter bullshit! That's a fact that I've personally researched and have evidence for!
If you have a strong psyche & can handle the truth, I'll give you that info. But I have to warn u, it will knock the foundation right out from under the Judeo-christian religion!
Correct me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that many amino acids fold in relatively similar ways. Thus you can have a single letter mutation at a specific site and still get a functional protein.
fascinating information. I really liked the use of visuals in the explanation of the protein shapes. (i personally have two different coloured eyes :)
Eye color is an example of a polygenic trait. Eye color is controlled by the production of melanin and eumelanin to produce different pigment colors. Since Blue and Brown are encoded by the same gene, brown being dominand and blue being recessive, and green is its own gene, either green (dominant) or not green (recessive) it is possible to have an incomplete dominance resulting in blue eyes with brown spots, or eye color which fluctuates between pigments, usually blue to green.
Interesting, as I have a couple of brown spots on one of my eyes and they both go from a deep blue to a green. Thank you. I plan on researching this topic more, as it is quite fascinating.
in proteins, shape has everything to do with function, proteins can be modeled using programs like pymol, btw there is no such thing as a synthetic protein.
@Cootabux: Most protein functions depend upon the 3D positioning of electrical charges in that "activation area" of a protein. Any changes to a protein which leaves the active areas unchanged probably doesn't affect the usefulness of the protein. For example, there are billions of different codings for the protein which synthesizes vitamin C in the body, but it happens that a mutation has affected the active area of the human copy, making it necessary that we get our vit-C from the environment.
I think it's rather that they are most easily recognized by their shape, the shape itself doesn't provide any attributes. At least, that's how I interpreted that
It is very difficult to predict how a string of hundreds of amino acids will fold. In fact, even non-coding parts of mRNA can effect the final shape of the protein even though the amino acid sequence in preserved. But, we can make synthetic proteins and look for beneficial uses.
forger - the "shape is everything" because it determines what molecules will bind with it and how strongly. The physical hills and valleys, and the electrical attraction determine this and is the primary attribute.
@TheStoicAgnostic: Let's better say that there is much that remains to be known about our genome - the potential uses of the "junk dna", the locations and effects and controls on regulating genes, and the similar effects of epigenetic materials which control the wrapping and activation of genes, for starters.
there's a game called foldit you can create dna and fold it .. but it's not just a game it's research .. super computers can't do it but scientists made this in the hope that someone can do it .. that the brain can work it out...
i must admit im totally clueless about biology. . how do you know what side of the DNA ladder your sequencing. . you get a sequence, say ATCCTA, how can you tell if its that and not 1/2 the "right side and 1/2 "the left"??
braunblender 2 months ago
Creationists can't handle truth.
That's just too damn bad.
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
lol, sound effects are pretty fun
FantasyandJesus101 1 year ago
im a hindu and i believe in aircrafts and rocket science more than flying chariots and monkeys...
08arijit 1 year ago
This stuff is so trippy, i love it.Should watch this on shrooms ;D
Matu1 1 year ago
Derp Derp Im a Creationist
Derp Derp Im an Evolutionist
Keep it in church/thoughts/away from me
Aldawok12 1 year ago
@Aldawok12 Don´t worry, the discussion will go on with or without you. If it didn´t, we´d all be stuck like you.
ThePhilosorpheus 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aldawok12 Don´t worry, the discussion will go on with or without you. If it didn´t, we´d all be stuck like you.
ThePhilosorpheus 9 months ago
Assertion city. Tell me what "older literature" that causes doubts about "sincerity of these authors", and I'll consider it. Science makes no attempt to pit itself against god, it merely seeks to explain the world naturally rather than supernaturally. So far, it seems to have worked out well. Wouldn't you say so, using a computer build on scientific principles and powered by a grid system that depends, among other things, on nuclear fusion, quantum mechanics and other "theories"?
puncheex 1 year ago
Evolution has been a lie from day one, period. Some of the older literature have clauses that make you think about the sincerity of these authors. Its as if they knew of their own deception. The sad thing is that there has been an attempt to pit science against the bible, and the God of the bible.
The ultimate knowledge comes from God. It was He who made all things from the foundation. Before the any scientist discovered that the earth was round, Isaiah the prophet said so. Explain that one.
Bobbyaf 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf Isaiah may have heard it from the ancient greeks, who said it earlier (the atomic theory came from a greek philosophy: atomism)
You speak of honesty, but you prefer a book where human sacrifice is not only condoned, but encouraged (as is slavery and a lot of other fun things)
Nobody ever pit science against the Bible. it's just that science discovers facts that oppose the "truths" of the Bible, so theists take it as an attack,when none was aimed at no one.
Xgya2000 1 year ago
@Xgya2000
The prophet existed before Greece began as a dynasty.
Bobbyaf 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf The words of Isaiah say nothing of atoms. They are named atmos after the atomists (Atomos = smallest)
His words say nothing of a round Earth either. He said he could reach the end of it though (round Earth with an end...)
You first called about old authors that may have doubted about the truth of their work. I say older authors (religious texts) were so sure of themselves they taught illusions.
Xgya2000 1 year ago
@Xgya2000 It didn't have to. Besides the name was merely philosophically based. It was not proven then. Isaiah called the earth a circle. Is a circle round? LOL...The expression "to the ends of the earth" is an expression connoting the idea that no one can hide from God. He's omnipresent. When we say our hands are tied, are they literally? No. Besides, why would any author be doubtful of their work after spending time doing it? Why be bothered? Makes sense to you?
Bobbyaf 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf He called it a circle, in the flat sense.
He also talked about how he could have fallen off the earth, so "ends of the world" is not an expression in this case
When you say your hands are tied, they can literally be. The words just have two meanings
The work of a scientist is to doubt everything already in place
Why be bothered? Because it brings you influence.
The reason evolution is taught as true is because all evidence points towards it, and none against. It's not based on faith
Xgya2000 1 year ago
@Xgya2000 Can history lie? Don't expect you to read with any accuracy what you don't understand. Besides, God forbad human sacrifices. What you call slavery was in fact a servant type like of service where those who served were paid and fed, which is typical of what you do for a living. Its either you're daft because I told you that Isaiah lived before the Greeks.
Since you're able to defend what others have written for you just say so and stop hitting on a history book.
Evolution is a lie.
Bobbyaf 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf god asked people to sacrifice their sons and daughters.
What you call servant-like is making a human being your property, paid to the original owner, not to the servant. They were fed though
Why treat a fable like a history book? Because you like having someone over your head that could drown the whole planet if he wanted?
Xgya2000 1 year ago 2
@Bobbyaf What do you mean? DNA is a much more ancient text than anything one can make up for example, god. Just because you don't know how to read it, don't simply dispute it. Maybe you should read some science text books or journals, then you will know that religion is against scientific theory, not the other way around. Look in the mirror and wonder who the antagonists are.
dunnyhf 1 year ago
@dunnyhf
I am a medical scientist so what are you saying? LOL....My understanding of what I have studied, doesn't support the lies of the theory of evolution. Life could not have conveniently come about by chance. That is bulls, and you know it.
Bobbyaf 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf a medical scientist that doesn't believe in evolution is an author that doesn't believe in printing. Evolution is a basis for everything and anything related to biology
Evolution has given so much to medicine, so much as to understanding how a previously well fought virus could fight off the medicine that once could kill it.
To anyone else reading my comments: Sorry for feeding the troll, but our "scientist" needs to learn some science.
Xgya2000 1 year ago
@Bobbyaf: Isaiah says that god "sits above the circle of the earth". Jewish cosmology, in common, not surprisingly, with other Mesopotamian civilizations, projects the Earth as a flat circular disk (google it if you don't believe me), so there is nothing at all odd about this expression, although the idea of him sitting on the edge and dangling his feet over is a bit comic. A spherical earth model, though known to classical Greeks, eluded most of Christianity until middle age times.
Your ball.
puncheex 1 year ago
are DNA strands visible with a microscope? or is it a dffrnt method
negativethoughts 1 year ago
Did there have to be a dick on the running human graphic guy.. -.-
D34dFilms 1 year ago
@D34dFilms: Sorry, they don't do non-anatomically correct models. I hope you don't in your films as well.
puncheex 1 year ago
You people should look up David Suzuki.....incredible scientist from Canada... also a very good speaker
national treasure in Canada!
themooddisorders 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mutations are not information.
Information is the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.
Mutations are like typeos. They destroy or impede information.
A Random Mutations Generator will prove this to you. See for yourself whether random mutations create or destroy information by using a standard RMG:
randommutation(dot)com
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
DNA serves the death blow to Evolution.
Einstein pointed to the nature and origin of symbolic information as one of the profound questions about the world as we know it. He could identify no means by which matter could bestow meaning to symbols. The clear implication is that symbolic information, or language, represents a category of reality distinct from matter and
energy.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
As Einstein points out the obvious.
Because the symbol/meaning association at the heart of language is purely non-physical, there is no way that a purely physical interaction can create it. Information and language always arise from a mind that is not locked into the physical realm, and is able to step outside physical constraints into the world of ideas to form the abstract associations needed for a language structure to exist.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
(A) Information is: the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.
(B) Information exist independent of its medium.
(the same information can be stored in one's mind, expressed verbally, written on paper, typed on a computer etc.)
(C) Code = Language. Language originates in a MIND.
Only language known to man is: (1) That of human mind origin (2) DNA code.
Information is not matter or energy.
Language is not matter or energy.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
Evolutionists are backed up into a corner. The SCIENCE is on the side of Intelligent Design. What do they do? They RE FRAME the argument as one of "science vs. religion."
Richard Dawkins is a perfect example. After losing BIG in a debate against a Creationist at Oxford, he vowed to never debate another Creationist again. Instead he devoted his time to writing books and giving lectures about the "evils" of GOD and religion!
DNA is NOT "religion." DNA is scientific proof that God exists.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
Mr.88
Sorry, that's where you're wrong. Evolution is a fact, and has nothing 2 do with the origin of life.
Why do u lie??
Have u ever heard of directed panspermia?
U think that design automatically proves your version of god??
Directed Panspermia makes much more pratical & logical sense! Not an invisible god who waves his magic wand!!
Instead of believing all that crap you've cut & pasted, why not stick with science?
There is no proof of god's existence, most certianly not the Xian god
Cootabux 1 year ago
General Evolution has been proven to be a lie.
There is no such thing as one genus (KIND) evolving into another genus (KIND).
Evolutionists finally admit that. The problem is that they have not removed General Evolution Theory from the text books and are still pushing it on people via "suggestive" means. For example, PBS keeps running Evolution programs where they fail to clarify that humans have always been humans and animals have always been animals. They 'suggest' man evolved from animals.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
Me88
Evolution is a scientific fact! it's not going anywhere!
Please give us the name of the Evolutionists you're talking about here who supposedly admitted Evolution is wrong, or is a lie.
WHAT!! There R 2 dozen transitional forms in our human branch, that spans from the most primitive 2 our present form!! And u have the gall 2 say humans were always humans???
If we were created fully formed, why do we have atavistic dna? Why vestigial organs? Humans grow tails in early embryonic stage!
Cootabux 1 year ago
Mr.88
I've seen some serious cases of denial before, but you're the worst!
I'm sorry if science is breaking your fantasy bubble, but u just need to mature, and deal with it!
The "invisible god did it" scenario is utter bullshit! That's a fact that I've personally researched and have evidence for!
If you have a strong psyche & can handle the truth, I'll give you that info. But I have to warn u, it will knock the foundation right out from under the Judeo-christian religion!
Cootabux 1 year ago
the correct verbage is that it's fascinating how everything 'evolved'.
aburling7 2 years ago 2
oopscanda, i trust you are using the term "designed" figuratively"
aburling7 2 years ago
It is fascinating how everything was designed. I agree.
oopscanada 2 years ago
oop..
As in nature's design, yeah!
Cootabux 1 year ago
blue eye color is caused by defective proteins my ass!
justnaesman 2 years ago
Correct me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that many amino acids fold in relatively similar ways. Thus you can have a single letter mutation at a specific site and still get a functional protein.
omegavalerius 2 years ago
fascinating information. I really liked the use of visuals in the explanation of the protein shapes. (i personally have two different coloured eyes :)
navmachine 2 years ago 17
DNA to MRNA to Proteins to all the incredibly diverse functions of our body, from acid production to growth of hair.
DNA is truly a powerfull kind of molecule.
qanazir 2 years ago
Love it. Love it a lot. This was a spectacular video, awful naked CG man notwithstanding. : P
Bobbiethejean 2 years ago
Hey, I can see his weiner!!
WhiteBull 2 years ago
What if my eyes change color? Blue to Green?
Awesome video!
KARIN094 2 years ago
Eye color is an example of a polygenic trait. Eye color is controlled by the production of melanin and eumelanin to produce different pigment colors. Since Blue and Brown are encoded by the same gene, brown being dominand and blue being recessive, and green is its own gene, either green (dominant) or not green (recessive) it is possible to have an incomplete dominance resulting in blue eyes with brown spots, or eye color which fluctuates between pigments, usually blue to green.
biomanwin 2 years ago
Interesting, as I have a couple of brown spots on one of my eyes and they both go from a deep blue to a green. Thank you. I plan on researching this topic more, as it is quite fascinating.
KARIN094 2 years ago
bio...
I love this subject. But tell me, I'm Indian (Amer.) and my eyes are black. Why is that and where does it come from? I'd really like to know.
Cootabux 1 year ago
in proteins, shape has everything to do with function, proteins can be modeled using programs like pymol, btw there is no such thing as a synthetic protein.
sandblastedred 2 years ago
That's not true at all, there *are* synthetic proteins. A simple search will find them...
Gerafix 2 years ago
san...
Now that's interesting! I'd heard the shape is as ifluencial as the coding...or can be. Is that true?
Cootabux 1 year ago
@Cootabux: Most protein functions depend upon the 3D positioning of electrical charges in that "activation area" of a protein. Any changes to a protein which leaves the active areas unchanged probably doesn't affect the usefulness of the protein. For example, there are billions of different codings for the protein which synthesizes vitamin C in the body, but it happens that a mutation has affected the active area of the human copy, making it necessary that we get our vit-C from the environment.
puncheex 1 year ago
awesome video!
ngarbo00 2 years ago
Check youtube vid clip from the film Renegade aka Blueberry by blurreal.
SphericSenseS 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am speechless!
danben72 2 years ago
Comment removed
danben72 2 years ago
Blue eyes are a genetic defect? Hitler wouldn't have been happy to hear that ;)
forger42 2 years ago 5
Incidentally, desire to have a moustache like Hitler's is also a genetic defect.
Joerexia 2 years ago 2
Defect? maybe a mutation...
anglaismoyen 2 years ago
hahaha! xD
I have blue eyes, and that is freakin helarious!
Hitler: "Blue eyes are superior!!!"
Scientist:"Actually, it's because the eye is handicapped."
DayDark87 2 years ago 29
If shape is everything to a protein, then could synthetic proteins be modelled based on using the right shape?
WouldbeSage 2 years ago
I think it's rather that they are most easily recognized by their shape, the shape itself doesn't provide any attributes. At least, that's how I interpreted that
forger42 2 years ago
shape does have a big factor, but i don't know enofe to answer your question sorry
StandAloneForever 2 years ago
It is very difficult to predict how a string of hundreds of amino acids will fold. In fact, even non-coding parts of mRNA can effect the final shape of the protein even though the amino acid sequence in preserved. But, we can make synthetic proteins and look for beneficial uses.
forger - the "shape is everything" because it determines what molecules will bind with it and how strongly. The physical hills and valleys, and the electrical attraction determine this and is the primary attribute.
drchaffee 2 years ago
Excellent vid! Good quality stuff!
Paxmax 2 years ago
there way more unknown than what is known about DNA
and it's probably going to stay that way for a long time
TheStoicAgnostic 2 years ago
That was a very agnostic thing to say, lol, but it is truth...
segerocker 2 years ago
@TheStoicAgnostic: Let's better say that there is much that remains to be known about our genome - the potential uses of the "junk dna", the locations and effects and controls on regulating genes, and the similar effects of epigenetic materials which control the wrapping and activation of genes, for starters.
puncheex 1 year ago
7:51 - why is there a solar system model in the picture? How is that related to the topic at hand?
Excellent video.
1RadicalOne 2 years ago
They're just recycling clips. :)
Abengoshis 2 years ago
Yes, I noticed. They used the running skeleton again.
1RadicalOne 2 years ago
so having blue eyes is bad?
JahLoveOnline 2 years ago
Nope, it's just one of the many neutral mutations that can occur that does no harm, and doesn't really provide a natural advantage.
Woad25 2 years ago 3
no, he was just using that as an example.
Zovex11 2 years ago
an example of what?
JahLoveOnline 2 years ago
Excellent video; I'll bet the CG artist was a woman with a BIG imagination.
DustyMay1944 2 years ago
This should be in my science class 0-0
MarowakDidIt 2 years ago 2
These videos are so wonderful. Keep them up.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago 2
there's a game called foldit you can create dna and fold it .. but it's not just a game it's research .. super computers can't do it but scientists made this in the hope that someone can do it .. that the brain can work it out...
HolidayNova 2 years ago 3
i hope they dont flag this vid
toloverufan2 2 years ago
i saw a penis o_o
n1bigdaddy 2 years ago
Or to give it it's scientific names. Knob, Shlong, Tallywhacker.
Zed1967 2 years ago
Or Pecker, one eyed monster, johnson.
SucculentJuniper 2 years ago
Or Weiner, Dick, Willy lmao XD
The scene from the Austin Powers movie is going through my mind now LMFAO
Zed1967 2 years ago
accidental 2 star
Singebuggercat 2 years ago
Absolutely fascinating.
Thanks a lot for posting.
bshieldsbb01 2 years ago
Excellent video
noelplum99 2 years ago 3
Awesome vid as always!
ZwiffleOwnsU 2 years ago 3
second
zincsaucier1 2 years ago
I'm going to make that ladder someday, and create the greatest whore ever known to man!
Nades129 2 years ago
hahaha lol
n1bigdaddy 2 years ago