if space is in absolute equilibrium so we can not feel it then the opposite reaction to it which is reality should also be in absolute equilibrium....but why do we feel it?
You need to allow yourself to believe this is true or there is no point of watching. I think some people are scared to realise how small and insignificant we are to the the universe and that there is no God watching over us.
Quantum physics nasty infinity search, lead me to this wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/timelike-entanglement/
posted 1/21/2011 Keep your minds open, Nassim is oviously very intelligent, and is the pioneer in this line of thinking on unified "quantum" field theory.
In ordinary entanglement, two particles (usually electrons or photons) are so intimately bound that they share one quantum state — spin, momentum and a host of other variables- between them.[Excerpt from this recent post]
@RidingTheWaves101 Strangely, I pasted your link, but it didn't work. But if you search for 'timelike-entanglement' on the Wired site, you'll get the article. It's an interesting article, dunno how robust it is. But with the best will in the world, I can't see any of it connected to Nassim's theories. The article mentions black holes... er... is that it?
Two things you might notice from the comments on Haramein's videos:
(a) there are a number of people giving reasoned explanations, with relevant references, to explain just some of the hundreds of logical flaws, inconsistencies, discrepancies from observation, misunderstandings in his work;
(b) he has a large number of very obnoxious supporters.
@steeltable218, think what you want, it's not as if we're in a scientific award ceremony. my comments are merely pieces of information, not to be taken at face value. you can either keep them installed in what limited brain memory you have left, or leave them lying outside the scope of your horizon.
@TheBobathon - aka I'm right, your wrong, I'm smart, your dumb. Pretty much the crutch of your argument? One you've been spending a huge amount of time/energy on in youtube comments section. GL with that.
I've explained in detail why Haramein's ideas are false, and also why they disagree blatantly with observations of protons in the real world. My argument is about facts and reasoning and observation.
Search for schproton if you want to see what my argument is, rather than just shouting boo from the sidelines. Let me know what's wrong with anything specific that I've said, or what evidence you think you have in favour of anything specific of Haramein's. That'd be fun.
@TheBobathon sorry friend. Had a look at your site. Thats a nasty obsession you have their. If you were to point to actual articles you've published where you can demonstrate this I think it would go a long way in supporting your argument.
@10100003 I disagree that investigating the truth, explaining it to others as clearly as I can and inviting discussion is a nasty obsession. I can see you prefer an argument from authority, which is not my style.
If you understand what I've written and disagree, please say what you disagree with, and why. If you don't understand, you can ask for clarity, we can discuss it.
I suspect you are not interested in trying to understand it. That's fine. Just admit it and stop being childish.
@TheBobathon nice one. I post a reply on your page and its marked as spam. Go grind your ax elsewhere. Don't waste your time with bobathon, his user name means masturbation (google it). He's a troll. ignore.
@TheBobathon btw doesn't the various strands of string theory suggest the possibility of multiply realities? Was reading an article by stephen hawking in new scientists a while back. Only up to 6/45, but so far not that dissimilar.
if you're unable to think in higher dimensions, it's not your fault. maybe you've been 'conditioned'. You're just another slave, trapped inside a box.
2+2=4 and 2x2=4. don't think any differently. there is no such thing as finding the square root of -1, or dividing infinities. it's just outside of your realm. you are a rational human being that uses 5% of his brain.
stick to your ordinary mathematics. please don't work your brain too hard otherwise it might overheat and break down.
@tdcnetwork Seems to me from everything you've said that you have trouble thinking in just 3 dimensions, my friend. By the way, 2 + 2 actually is 4, except in a fascist state.
Probably none of you are ready for this information. Remember, it is only information. You believe it whether you want to or not. Each point is infinite, therefore every word that comes out of this guys mouth can be real, unreal, or neither of them. You decide. The possibilities are endless. What is truth?
Your house burned down yesterday. You ate a whole bowl of rat's droppings for breakfast. Every atom in your body weighs more than the world's largest oil tanker. All the members of your family wear fluorescent jackets all day. Every time you say the word "squid", a piano will fall on your head.
You're probably not ready for this information.
I believe we're capable of figuring out the truth of a great deal of things.
@sleepingwhale No they don't. The last thing the world needs is people hell-bent on casting judgement on ideas without bothering to understand them...
If you really want to see a hoax just turn to the big bang theory. Nassim doesn't rank with the scoundrels who support this bullshit theory—he is much too intelligent.
its subjective. science is essentially the winners logic. just because this man isnt backed by corporates doesnt mean he is a fraud. for a fraud he certainly puts the hours in.
@MrHEMPKING you don't think there's any objective truth? This guy makes shit up. Physicists do experiments, work things out in detail, test them, investigate them, explore them. You're saying there's no difference?
If I invented a list of what's in your fridge, and then you looked in your fridge and told me I was wrong, would you be out of line because all perspectives are valid?
That'd be a very silly world, MrH. Very silly indeed.
@steeltable218 Ofcourse chemistry works, but we will build bigger and bigger particle accelerators and we'll never find the most fundamental building blocks of matter.
@TinyCoconut: you coconut head.. I'm positive that you don't understand a thing of what you've learnt at school. I'm sure that you just have a good memory and keep repeating steatment (like a pray) in order to get one day the phd! you poor fuckker!
this is like reasing the mind of someone who will revolutionize physics a little bit short into the future, or have these theories already been accepted? awsom video uploads
@TheBobathon His most recent scientific paper, “The Schwarzschild Proton,” was chosen by a panel of 11 peer reviewers, Haramein's paper won the prestigious "Best Paper Award" in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation.” at the University of Liège, Belgium during the 9th International Conference CASYS'09 (Computing Anticipatory Systems).
@aakuster amazes me that people are still rattling that one off. It wasn't awarded by a University. He presented it at a computing systems conference and the other guys there judged it the best "physics, quantum mechanics, etc." paper at that single conference. They weren't even scientists. Get real.
@TheBobathon I'm not trying to convert your way of thinking. I just feel you are inacurate when you claim his theories have been disproven, that's your opinion.
@aakuster it's no more my opinion than the fact that gravity pulls objects towards the earth. The whole thing is fundamentally flawed from the outset. Basic physics is basic physics, it's not a matter of opinion.
The mass of a proton very clearly isn't 885 million tonnes. And the force holding them together very clearly isn't 7.49x10^47 dynes. It's like someone trying to say the Sun is the size of a grain of sand.
@TheBobathon We'll see how it all plays out. All I know is that I don't go watch lectures about theories I think are b.s. and spend my time commenting on them and arguing w/ people.
@aakuster see how what plays out? If facts like those don't make it clear, I can't imagine what you're waiting to hear.
I'm not being deliberately antagonistic. But I do think it's worthwhile letting people know when someone is making a living from fake science and pretending to be something he's not.
Whether individuals such as yourself want to take any notice is another matter, of course. You have every right to believe that every proton in your body weighs 885 million tonnes if you choose to.
@TheBobathon Are you one of those people who views mainstream science aka Hawking, Dawkins, Green, as fact not theory? As dare I say, Gospel? Thats the divide we have here, your belief system is based on mainstrem physics, which Haramein and others view as fundamentally flawed. As I said, only time will tell. Peace.
@aakuster no, I don't treat anything as gospel at all. It's nothing to do with attachment to mainstream views.
What kind of view could possibly disagree with the two facts I just gave you.
What could you be waiting for time to tell you?
It's hard to understand why you're trying to argue about my belief system instead of reading and trying to understand the paper you seem to think is true.
If you don't understand his paper, why in heaven are you arguing about it?
@aakuster Do you want to argue about what plants I have in my garden too? Will you tell me your crazy theory of what's in my garden, and assert that I can't actually know that either, and only time will tell which of us is right? That strikes me as a little silly.
@aakuster Illusions don't play out, they just disappear. And if you don't watch/interact with points of view or theories you don't agree with, doesn't that mean that you end up agreeing with everything? Vital in the New Age, I suppose. And it's vital that with material like Haramein's there are dissenting voices somewhere, as he's utterly - and rightly - ignored by most of the educated. Bobathon sees him as an exploitative fake and he's pointing out why. I agree with him and applaud his motives.
What I do know about scientists is the fact that they do not know the exact nature of an atom! And in fact, no scientist can give the exact nature of space. In fact there is no such thing as absolute empty space. Let's say, for want of words, that the infinite whole, is vibration. Then what causes the manifestation of reality of the objective world is the RATE of vibration, that causes the infinite number of divisions that we see in the real objective world. In essence all is vibration.
@TheBobathon, oh yeah, your right Nassim knows no physics, he was only up there just talking about the relationship between the Easter Bunny and Saddam Hussein.
1.616 x 10 -33, hmmm...That's funny, considering how "616" was once considered by Bible scholars as and "alternate number for the Beast, and...of course, the 33 degrees of Freemasonry. Of course, if they said: "Decimeters" then it would be 10 -34, and if they said "millimeters", it would be 10-32. But no...Convention says it is in centimeters. Measurements in physics are all about religion.
It's actually quite astonishing how dismissive the majority of you are. If you have such a thorough understanding of physics, then i invite you to read through the papers that he has published on his website (resonanceproject) go through the complex mathematics yourselves, then and only then when you have read all he has to offer and understand it, come back and back up your claims.
@reshad1 And if I do read them, understand them, and show you reason after reason why they're nonsense from start to finish, would you read it, consider it and respond to it?
I'm asking because it's often a waste of time - many people lay down challenges like these, but when it comes to it, they don't really want to engage with reasoning that might threaten their views.
Perhaps that doesn't apply to you - maybe you're genuinely asking a question here. If so, I'll happily take you up on that.
@TheBobathon of course mate :) i'm assuming that you have a reasonable mathematical and physics based background or at least a sufficient interest in the latter to be able to go through what he has to say and to make your point. I love maths and physics, they're just academic puzzles to me lol, but more than that i love 'personal paradigm shifts in understanding!'. This guy has struck a chord with me, as he has with many. I look forward to hearing from you mate :) all the best, resh
There is a whole sect of people in our world, that believe this stuff. They work this in to their guru theories, that make absolutely no real sense and cannot be verified mathematically or physically, but yet they still believe and pass on the information like an urban legend. Its pretty scary to me because there seems to be so many people like this who believe in the Icke's and Nassim's of the world.
@ghpink ...it;s relative...they are part of the different perspectives portrayed around the globe....What do you have to say about the world apart from futile skepticism?
@SagaSudaka There is a difference between skepticism and common sense. I am not being skeptic. I just know more physics then Nassim does. That is not hard either because he has a low level of knowledge about physics. The things he says are logical, IF you have no background in physics or the sciences. And most people do not have this background. So it seems intelligent. But to anyone who has a basic knowledge of physics, it just doesn't work and there is no math to back it up. Period
@ghpink ok, well would you show me where is he wrong exactly? I recognize I'm not much of a physics person either and you may be right, but you are not any different from him [Nassim] if you don't explain where you are going. Have you given a second thought to the philosophy and others subjects behind his thinking?
@SagaSudaka Well I am open to anything personally, so I guess that's why I am here. Some basic mistakes he makes are saying that the "Phlanck Length" is where "the universe goes to that small then stops". Planck Length is basically a point in the scale that we can detect with present technology. Also renormalization is just a tool used by many fields of physics and math, for mathematical purposes. He clearly doesn't understand it.
Man has built in himself images as a fence of security—religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates mans thinking, his relationships, and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems for they divide man from man. His perception of life is shaped by the concepts already established in his mind. The content of his consciousness is his entire existence. Truth is a pathless land.
I've yet to hear some legitimate explanations for those slanderous words as well besides the fact that he sells his DVDs around 75 bucks but hey, everyone's got to make a living eh?
If you go back through the other threads, many people have listed specific examples of harameins errors. However, much of what he says is not even tractable, it is so monumentally wrong as to be like trying to explain why the tooth fairy doesn't exist.
If you want physics for everyone, try Neil Tyler or Carl Sagan or Brian Cox or Michio Kaku... there are loads of great people who can communicate brilliant ideas about the cosmos, but who know what they're talking about. And tell the truth.
None of them will claim to know it all.
A lot of people do "like" Nassim's ideas, but he knows no physics. If you want analysis of why he's wrong, and why he's manipulative (or maybe very delusional, who can tell), search for Haramein fraud or sage.
@TheBobathon I don't think Nassim's self-aware enough to be manipulative, so
I don't think he's a conscious fraud (the idea that he buys his own hype may be more frightening), but pepper a massive sense of self-importance with a tiny bit of knowledge in a few related fields and chuck in a scientifically ignorant audience, and hey, you've got a performance. I enjoyed your blogs btw, amazing at the emotionally-driven attacks you get for simply pointing out basic errors.
@steeltable218 thanks. You could be right. I think some combination of the two, but who knows. I find it hard to believe there isn't an inkling of conscience in there.
The thing is, even if there is, once you've got all these people thinking you're the next Einstein, how do you back out even if you want to? Do you (a) admit you're a fake, (b) fade into obscurity or (c) milk the uninformed?
TinyCoconut idk why i pay mind to you but you really piss me off, go watch your Cherry Ferretti or something thats just as stupid. The past 40min of his presentation has just been over one thing, that is the concept of "infinite".
Count the number of times where he says "like, oh my god!"
Real physicists do real research with particle accelerators, spectrometers and hours of tedious calculation. This guy looks (and sounds) like he does all his 'research' with a bong and some pills.
All you need to do is make up any science-y sounding shit and say it with enough confidence; there will be no shortage of braindead morons who'll just assume 'you are too smart for them'.
@TinyCoconut ..."hours of tedious calculation"? Isn't calculation done with a calculator these days?
Your second paragraph fairly describes why I would pay no attention to your post. Everything in physics and math aside, his simple explanation of the pyramids and what the "phd's or "academics" official explanation for them are, make the side your are putting yourself on, look near retarded. Backwoods 2 digit IQ virginia hillsmen can understand it's wrong. Egyptologists are right?
@TinyCoconut ..."hours of tedious calculation"? Isn't calculation done with a calculator these days?
Your second paragraph fairly describes why I would pay no attention to your post. Everything in physics and math aside, his simple explanation of the pyramids and what the "phd's or "academics" official explanation for them are, make the side your are putting yourself on, look near retarded. Backwoods 2 digit IQ virginia hillsmen can understand it's wrong. So egyptologists are correct, right?
@999silverrush So do you know what a calculation is? Tends to be a bit more to it than the kind of thing you'd use a calculator for.
Don't let a lack of imagination convince you that all academics do is invent school textbook explanations, as Haramein would love you to believe. He's massively naive, and relies on massive naivety in his audience.
@EleanorHandcart "Don't let a lack of imagination convince you..." What is this 1984 newspeak? "academics do is invent school textbook explanations...." so called "race-based slavery", WW1, Korea, Vietnam gulfoftonkin, panama, grenada, iran, pro-sadaam funding, wmd's, "forensic science"... "and of course they oblige"... the academics must have researched those things on a monday. Even if you had an iq of 190, you would still be dumb.
u sound like an iluminati agent dude, when u make fun of him, u make fun of all the ancient civilisations , and without the sience of the ancient civilisation, u donkeys from west wouldent have SHIT, JACK SHIT
thank the Eyptian the greeks, the persian, the chinese the mayan the indian
u stupied white boy, we are at least 1000 years ahead of u , when it comes to the sience of energy, u just re define some of the old formulas WE GAVE URE U
@Meriamen . thanx people need to speak when these white devils talkes to much, when these white trash people dont understand, they turn to their ego and jeliousy
this is the tradtion of the white man. 1 love, keep up the good work, keep trusting in God / Peace om Iran
Anicent people used bio tech, which means, they understood the powers from within.
the white man, use tech and high tech. but tech and high tech can only explain what u can observe with ure eyez ,and with the help of machines.
with bio tech u just need to tune in , in the planets electro magnetic field, sience electro magnetics has memory, theirfore it will reavil many secrets. They know this !
@BenjiPars thank you for that currently some troll keeps sending me messages about chemtrails not BEING REAL my god what is going to take to get rid of these devils. I want my planet back and I am willing to behead whoever to get it.
@TinyCoconut you dont have to be surrounded by recording equipment working within the boundries to come up with something new..sometimes brilliant people come along that tear the arse out of our known understanding by stepping away from conventional thinking..then theres people like you who will not believe an unconventional view like rats in a maze waiting for a corner so that they can change direction..wake up my friend theres a whole new world out there that isnt flat..peace light and love
@TinyCoconut Wow! Dear fellow YouTubian... :) Most of our current knowledge in mathematics and physics was discovered in the ancient times; the Greek contribution is taught at school for the most part, like Thales, Pythagoras, Aristotle (yes, him too), or Archimedes to name a few. Those people were not researchers - they were THINKERS! By thinking logically & following a certain reasonable pattern, i.e. like Descartes in 'Meditations,' they came up with what we know today as fact! Without CERN!
first off chocoass if phisics was were it should be you would have to worry about real mutants running around and second if everyone thats disputing this guy why dont they come up with better theorys to beat the belief systems already proposed.its like when i teach guitar there are myriad better methods out there that you discover the more you break down a theory.its a hell of an awsome thing hes doing 'imagine greater'DICKHEADS.GO FUCK YOURSELF NERDS
Evasius, my attitude to nassims videos comes from actually knowing physics. Here's a simple example;- inform yourself on the Planck Length, then look at nassims ridiculous claim that this is where "the universe goes to that small then stops". In fact, Planck Units are a non-anthropocentric scale of measurement, physics doesn't "stop" there at all.
@zybyl The reason why this seems logical to people is they have not studied the basic physics. Then you have this guy Nassim who uses the words in physics and doesn't really understand it. He is then trying to explain the physics he doesn't understand, to people who have no base at all in physics. Its pretty funny. Watching these videos, I found way too many mistakes to even begin to comment on them. Its funny what people will believe in, if left to their own...
@zybyl If you saw how he showed infinite boundaries in a circle, and noticed that he only used plancks constant as an example, not a rule, would you change your mind about what you think? In fact you just made nassim's lecture more credible! He is being sarcastic when he claims "the universe goes to that small and stops". How did you not notice that @5:50 ?
A naive audience laughing at a delusional clown as he blunders thru a string of fallacies and misconceptions supposedly "overturning" established science. If only this audience would have armed themselves with some bona fide science before they turned up at this train wreck of a "lecture".
@zybyl yes, can you even imagine him presenting this talk in a seminar of trained, educated and experienced mathematicians and physicists? I'd give him 10 minutes before he was left talking to himself (and, no, it wouldn't be because he was challenging their ideas...). A charismatic delusional suffering from a classic Dunning-Kruger effect.
@steeltable218 Dunning-Kruger effect. Mmm, thanks for introducing me to that :-)
I've started to realise how many people seem to suffer from a pathological inability to acknowledge the limits of their understanding of some topic. Haramein is a clear example, as are those who spout forth about the 'mainstream' and feel they're actually debating with scientists.
There's something badly wrong with education if it's so unacceptable to admit a lack of understanding that people are driven to this.
@TheBobathon A very interesting point. Perhaps it's a subtle effect of an information-rich culture. Simple ignorance may cause a guilt reaction in many of us. Maybe 'not knowing' is seen as some shameful measure in an era when the sum of human knowledge is within easy reach. Many feel we ought to know on a subliminal level, or we're lessened in some way. Knowing is success, while unknowing is failure. So many embrace and inflate their sense of the first, and deny the other...
@TheBobathon Mastery of a subject, like an instrument, can take decades. Many, like Haramein, want to take a quick-fix-short-cut past the basics and expect the serious-minded to take him seriously. Like a toddler who's learned the xylophone trying to take apart a Mozart composition. But this kind of hubris is an insult to the majesty of nature and the millions of brilliant individuals who have dedicated their lives to uncovering its workings. But we can dismiss all that as 'mainstream' can't we?
@blasphemylolz I don't think zybyl is worried about surviving. I think he's just saying what a number of people have also observed - that your guy's talking shite.
In context to the calculation of infinity: Quantum physics and general relativity are like 2 circles, each resounding within each other to infinity.......'we' the observers of both realities of concepts are what links both circles together contecting the observation of infinity : )
@BinAlladin lol you loser. Its so simple because you have a simple mind and its simply not true. If it makes sense to you, you need to head back to school for a grade 10 to 12 physics course. You would then see what nonsense it really is..
his ideas on a total equilibrium vacuum is actually in accordance to the zero-vector systems that zero-point energy researchers have. Basically its untapped source of infinite energy that can solve the world's energy problems, its free energy for all.
I love this guy. I want to see a character in a movie (maybe done by depp) inspired by him. its like comic genius waiting to be exploited. and the reason I laugh is because I know how right he is. its damn great.
Take some shrooms.. You'll see he is right
kroese1870 4 weeks ago
1:33 till 1:54
He explains Pi right there.
Yezpahr 2 months ago
9:56 But we can feel different density. By the water!
ikemkrueger 4 months ago
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win you're still retarded.
Megadeathsherald 4 months ago 8
Instead of trying to prove this intelligent man wrong.. why not take what he is saying and use the parts that seem true to you and run with it.
JustThatGood23 4 months ago 5
if space is in absolute equilibrium so we can not feel it then the opposite reaction to it which is reality should also be in absolute equilibrium....but why do we feel it?
xtceeee1 6 months ago
WHY DOES THE NEXT VIDEO NOT WORK ggrrrrr
SailorReyes 11 months ago
You need to allow yourself to believe this is true or there is no point of watching. I think some people are scared to realise how small and insignificant we are to the the universe and that there is no God watching over us.
jakzak92 11 months ago
@jakzak92 Knowing that makes you feel so good doesn't it? Enjoy your insignificant life. You will never amount to anything.
TheMushshroom 5 months ago
if you think about it,.. there can not be infinitely small without infinitely big...
JBld1967 11 months ago
Quantum physics nasty infinity search, lead me to this wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/timelike-entanglement/
posted 1/21/2011 Keep your minds open, Nassim is oviously very intelligent, and is the pioneer in this line of thinking on unified "quantum" field theory.
In ordinary entanglement, two particles (usually electrons or photons) are so intimately bound that they share one quantum state — spin, momentum and a host of other variables- between them.[Excerpt from this recent post]
RidingTheWaves101 11 months ago
@RidingTheWaves101 Strangely, I pasted your link, but it didn't work. But if you search for 'timelike-entanglement' on the Wired site, you'll get the article. It's an interesting article, dunno how robust it is. But with the best will in the world, I can't see any of it connected to Nassim's theories. The article mentions black holes... er... is that it?
steeltable218 11 months ago
Two things you might notice from the comments on Haramein's videos:
(a) there are a number of people giving reasoned explanations, with relevant references, to explain just some of the hundreds of logical flaws, inconsistencies, discrepancies from observation, misunderstandings in his work;
(b) he has a large number of very obnoxious supporters.
TheBobathon 1 year ago 2
@TheBobathon
Two things you might notice from the comments on Haramein's videos:
(a) TheBobathon is a F****** TWAT.
(b) TheBobathon is also a TOSSER.
tdcnetwork 11 months ago
@tdcnetwork And, yup, any lingering integrity you had just got flushed down the toilet...
steeltable218 11 months ago
@steeltable218, think what you want, it's not as if we're in a scientific award ceremony. my comments are merely pieces of information, not to be taken at face value. you can either keep them installed in what limited brain memory you have left, or leave them lying outside the scope of your horizon.
tdcnetwork 11 months ago
@TheBobathon - aka I'm right, your wrong, I'm smart, your dumb. Pretty much the crutch of your argument? One you've been spending a huge amount of time/energy on in youtube comments section. GL with that.
10100003 8 months ago
@10100003 Hardly.
I've explained in detail why Haramein's ideas are false, and also why they disagree blatantly with observations of protons in the real world. My argument is about facts and reasoning and observation.
Search for schproton if you want to see what my argument is, rather than just shouting boo from the sidelines. Let me know what's wrong with anything specific that I've said, or what evidence you think you have in favour of anything specific of Haramein's. That'd be fun.
TheBobathon 8 months ago
@TheBobathon sorry friend. Had a look at your site. Thats a nasty obsession you have their. If you were to point to actual articles you've published where you can demonstrate this I think it would go a long way in supporting your argument.
10100003 8 months ago
@10100003 I disagree that investigating the truth, explaining it to others as clearly as I can and inviting discussion is a nasty obsession. I can see you prefer an argument from authority, which is not my style.
If you understand what I've written and disagree, please say what you disagree with, and why. If you don't understand, you can ask for clarity, we can discuss it.
I suspect you are not interested in trying to understand it. That's fine. Just admit it and stop being childish.
TheBobathon 8 months ago
@TheBobathon nice one. I post a reply on your page and its marked as spam. Go grind your ax elsewhere. Don't waste your time with bobathon, his user name means masturbation (google it). He's a troll. ignore.
10100003 8 months ago
@10100003 you haven't posted anything on my page - there's nothing in my spam. I don't censor anything.
Asking you not to be childish didn't work, did it :-) Is that now your best argument? Nice.
TheBobathon 8 months ago
@TheBobathon btw doesn't the various strands of string theory suggest the possibility of multiply realities? Was reading an article by stephen hawking in new scientists a while back. Only up to 6/45, but so far not that dissimilar.
10100003 8 months ago
if you're unable to think in higher dimensions, it's not your fault. maybe you've been 'conditioned'. You're just another slave, trapped inside a box.
2+2=4 and 2x2=4. don't think any differently. there is no such thing as finding the square root of -1, or dividing infinities. it's just outside of your realm. you are a rational human being that uses 5% of his brain.
stick to your ordinary mathematics. please don't work your brain too hard otherwise it might overheat and break down.
tdcnetwork 1 year ago
@tdcnetwork Seems to me from everything you've said that you have trouble thinking in just 3 dimensions, my friend. By the way, 2 + 2 actually is 4, except in a fascist state.
steeltable218 11 months ago
@steeltable218, seems to me you're just another twat. 1 twat + 1 twat = 2 twats. Compute that in your tiny little brain.
tdcnetwork 11 months ago
Probably none of you are ready for this information. Remember, it is only information. You believe it whether you want to or not. Each point is infinite, therefore every word that comes out of this guys mouth can be real, unreal, or neither of them. You decide. The possibilities are endless. What is truth?
tdcnetwork 1 year ago
@tdcnetwork Truth is what is.
Your house burned down yesterday. You ate a whole bowl of rat's droppings for breakfast. Every atom in your body weighs more than the world's largest oil tanker. All the members of your family wear fluorescent jackets all day. Every time you say the word "squid", a piano will fall on your head.
You're probably not ready for this information.
I believe we're capable of figuring out the truth of a great deal of things.
Don't just listen to this crap - investigate it.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
you are hilarious.
i've already listened to this crap anyway, so have you.
you are a piece of slimy dog shit - that's a fact.
tdcnetwork 1 year ago
some people are ridiculously stupid. seriously and ridiculously stupid. Let me give you some lyrics written by one of the best rappers in the world...
This soul's escaping, through this hole that is gaping
This world is mine for the taking
Make me king, as we move toward a, new world order
Lose Yourself - Eminem
Open your minds children. Read the first sentence. Sounds like someones talking about black holes.
tdcnetwork 1 year ago
the haters just dont know...
sleepingwhale 1 year ago
@sleepingwhale No they don't. The last thing the world needs is people hell-bent on casting judgement on ideas without bothering to understand them...
TheBobathon 1 year ago
If you really want to see a hoax just turn to the big bang theory. Nassim doesn't rank with the scoundrels who support this bullshit theory—he is much too intelligent.
mujaku 1 year ago
Hes like Good Will Hunting, except hes more "Hunting" than "Good Will."
zachpowell 1 year ago
This is great :-)
jag5599 1 year ago
everything you see is a perspective, not a truth.
its subjective. science is essentially the winners logic. just because this man isnt backed by corporates doesnt mean he is a fraud. for a fraud he certainly puts the hours in.
MrHEMPKING 1 year ago
@MrHEMPKING you don't think there's any objective truth? This guy makes shit up. Physicists do experiments, work things out in detail, test them, investigate them, explore them. You're saying there's no difference?
If I invented a list of what's in your fridge, and then you looked in your fridge and told me I was wrong, would you be out of line because all perspectives are valid?
That'd be a very silly world, MrH. Very silly indeed.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Science fails at fundamental molecular level, you know that man
blasphemylolz 1 year ago
@blasphemylolz no it doesn't, you nutter
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@blasphemylolz So chemistry doesn't work?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 Ofcourse chemistry works, but we will build bigger and bigger particle accelerators and we'll never find the most fundamental building blocks of matter.
blasphemylolz 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut: you coconut head.. I'm positive that you don't understand a thing of what you've learnt at school. I'm sure that you just have a good memory and keep repeating steatment (like a pray) in order to get one day the phd! you poor fuckker!
ALGAMANCHANNEL 1 year ago
this is like reasing the mind of someone who will revolutionize physics a little bit short into the future, or have these theories already been accepted? awsom video uploads
Zee96969696 1 year ago
@Zee96969696 no, they've been disproved and discredited. But don't let me put you off enjoying yourself.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon His most recent scientific paper, “The Schwarzschild Proton,” was chosen by a panel of 11 peer reviewers, Haramein's paper won the prestigious "Best Paper Award" in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation.” at the University of Liège, Belgium during the 9th International Conference CASYS'09 (Computing Anticipatory Systems).
aakuster 1 year ago
@aakuster amazes me that people are still rattling that one off. It wasn't awarded by a University. He presented it at a computing systems conference and the other guys there judged it the best "physics, quantum mechanics, etc." paper at that single conference. They weren't even scientists. Get real.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon I'm not trying to convert your way of thinking. I just feel you are inacurate when you claim his theories have been disproven, that's your opinion.
aakuster 1 year ago
@aakuster it's no more my opinion than the fact that gravity pulls objects towards the earth. The whole thing is fundamentally flawed from the outset. Basic physics is basic physics, it's not a matter of opinion.
The mass of a proton very clearly isn't 885 million tonnes. And the force holding them together very clearly isn't 7.49x10^47 dynes. It's like someone trying to say the Sun is the size of a grain of sand.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon We'll see how it all plays out. All I know is that I don't go watch lectures about theories I think are b.s. and spend my time commenting on them and arguing w/ people.
aakuster 1 year ago
@aakuster see how what plays out? If facts like those don't make it clear, I can't imagine what you're waiting to hear.
I'm not being deliberately antagonistic. But I do think it's worthwhile letting people know when someone is making a living from fake science and pretending to be something he's not.
Whether individuals such as yourself want to take any notice is another matter, of course. You have every right to believe that every proton in your body weighs 885 million tonnes if you choose to.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Are you one of those people who views mainstream science aka Hawking, Dawkins, Green, as fact not theory? As dare I say, Gospel? Thats the divide we have here, your belief system is based on mainstrem physics, which Haramein and others view as fundamentally flawed. As I said, only time will tell. Peace.
aakuster 1 year ago
@aakuster no, I don't treat anything as gospel at all. It's nothing to do with attachment to mainstream views.
What kind of view could possibly disagree with the two facts I just gave you.
What could you be waiting for time to tell you?
It's hard to understand why you're trying to argue about my belief system instead of reading and trying to understand the paper you seem to think is true.
If you don't understand his paper, why in heaven are you arguing about it?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Oh I get it now. You're a "have the last word guy". Go ahead, send me one more. Peace.
aakuster 1 year ago
@aakuster ok
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@aakuster Do you want to argue about what plants I have in my garden too? Will you tell me your crazy theory of what's in my garden, and assert that I can't actually know that either, and only time will tell which of us is right? That strikes me as a little silly.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@aakuster Illusions don't play out, they just disappear. And if you don't watch/interact with points of view or theories you don't agree with, doesn't that mean that you end up agreeing with everything? Vital in the New Age, I suppose. And it's vital that with material like Haramein's there are dissenting voices somewhere, as he's utterly - and rightly - ignored by most of the educated. Bobathon sees him as an exploitative fake and he's pointing out why. I agree with him and applaud his motives.
steeltable218 1 year ago
What I do know about scientists is the fact that they do not know the exact nature of an atom! And in fact, no scientist can give the exact nature of space. In fact there is no such thing as absolute empty space. Let's say, for want of words, that the infinite whole, is vibration. Then what causes the manifestation of reality of the objective world is the RATE of vibration, that causes the infinite number of divisions that we see in the real objective world. In essence all is vibration.
111RobinHood 1 year ago
@TheBobathon, oh yeah, your right Nassim knows no physics, he was only up there just talking about the relationship between the Easter Bunny and Saddam Hussein.
EricFinnerty 1 year ago
He has ideas but is obviously nuts
Buzzlybonk 1 year ago
@Buzzlybonk ohh yea....einstein was completely nuts too.
SagaSudaka 1 year ago
1.616 x 10 -33, hmmm...That's funny, considering how "616" was once considered by Bible scholars as and "alternate number for the Beast, and...of course, the 33 degrees of Freemasonry. Of course, if they said: "Decimeters" then it would be 10 -34, and if they said "millimeters", it would be 10-32. But no...Convention says it is in centimeters. Measurements in physics are all about religion.
floatingtux 1 year ago
It's actually quite astonishing how dismissive the majority of you are. If you have such a thorough understanding of physics, then i invite you to read through the papers that he has published on his website (resonanceproject) go through the complex mathematics yourselves, then and only then when you have read all he has to offer and understand it, come back and back up your claims.
reshad1 1 year ago
@reshad1 And if I do read them, understand them, and show you reason after reason why they're nonsense from start to finish, would you read it, consider it and respond to it?
I'm asking because it's often a waste of time - many people lay down challenges like these, but when it comes to it, they don't really want to engage with reasoning that might threaten their views.
Perhaps that doesn't apply to you - maybe you're genuinely asking a question here. If so, I'll happily take you up on that.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon of course mate :) i'm assuming that you have a reasonable mathematical and physics based background or at least a sufficient interest in the latter to be able to go through what he has to say and to make your point. I love maths and physics, they're just academic puzzles to me lol, but more than that i love 'personal paradigm shifts in understanding!'. This guy has struck a chord with me, as he has with many. I look forward to hearing from you mate :) all the best, resh
reshad1 1 year ago
@reshad1 Excellent. :) Do a search for haramislead, and let me know what you think over there.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
He actually makes fun of the fact that it doesn't, I think its just his showmanship
EdSter125 1 year ago
There is a whole sect of people in our world, that believe this stuff. They work this in to their guru theories, that make absolutely no real sense and cannot be verified mathematically or physically, but yet they still believe and pass on the information like an urban legend. Its pretty scary to me because there seems to be so many people like this who believe in the Icke's and Nassim's of the world.
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink ...it;s relative...they are part of the different perspectives portrayed around the globe....What do you have to say about the world apart from futile skepticism?
SagaSudaka 1 year ago
@SagaSudaka There is a difference between skepticism and common sense. I am not being skeptic. I just know more physics then Nassim does. That is not hard either because he has a low level of knowledge about physics. The things he says are logical, IF you have no background in physics or the sciences. And most people do not have this background. So it seems intelligent. But to anyone who has a basic knowledge of physics, it just doesn't work and there is no math to back it up. Period
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink ok, well would you show me where is he wrong exactly? I recognize I'm not much of a physics person either and you may be right, but you are not any different from him [Nassim] if you don't explain where you are going. Have you given a second thought to the philosophy and others subjects behind his thinking?
thx
SagaSudaka 1 year ago
@SagaSudaka Well I am open to anything personally, so I guess that's why I am here. Some basic mistakes he makes are saying that the "Phlanck Length" is where "the universe goes to that small then stops". Planck Length is basically a point in the scale that we can detect with present technology. Also renormalization is just a tool used by many fields of physics and math, for mathematical purposes. He clearly doesn't understand it.
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink check this page... theresonanceproject(dot)org/bob(dot)html
SagaSudaka 1 year ago
@SagaSudaka or just search for drbobathon in Google.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
The mathematical term for what Nassim calls infinitely small is zero.
newbetterandhappy 1 year ago
Man has built in himself images as a fence of security—religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates mans thinking, his relationships, and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems for they divide man from man. His perception of life is shaped by the concepts already established in his mind. The content of his consciousness is his entire existence. Truth is a pathless land.
OliverKopec 1 year ago
I've yet to hear some legitimate explanations for those slanderous words as well besides the fact that he sells his DVDs around 75 bucks but hey, everyone's got to make a living eh?
BecauseItRocks 1 year ago
If you go back through the other threads, many people have listed specific examples of harameins errors. However, much of what he says is not even tractable, it is so monumentally wrong as to be like trying to explain why the tooth fairy doesn't exist.
KatieSpecks 1 year ago
@KatieSpecks
Thanks! I'll go take a look.
BecauseItRocks 1 year ago
If you want physics for everyone, try Neil Tyler or Carl Sagan or Brian Cox or Michio Kaku... there are loads of great people who can communicate brilliant ideas about the cosmos, but who know what they're talking about. And tell the truth.
None of them will claim to know it all.
A lot of people do "like" Nassim's ideas, but he knows no physics. If you want analysis of why he's wrong, and why he's manipulative (or maybe very delusional, who can tell), search for Haramein fraud or sage.
TheBobathon 1 year ago 2
Sorry, that should say Neil Tyson, not Tyler :)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon I don't think Nassim's self-aware enough to be manipulative, so
I don't think he's a conscious fraud (the idea that he buys his own hype may be more frightening), but pepper a massive sense of self-importance with a tiny bit of knowledge in a few related fields and chuck in a scientifically ignorant audience, and hey, you've got a performance. I enjoyed your blogs btw, amazing at the emotionally-driven attacks you get for simply pointing out basic errors.
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 thanks. You could be right. I think some combination of the two, but who knows. I find it hard to believe there isn't an inkling of conscience in there.
The thing is, even if there is, once you've got all these people thinking you're the next Einstein, how do you back out even if you want to? Do you (a) admit you're a fake, (b) fade into obscurity or (c) milk the uninformed?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
TinyCoconut idk why i pay mind to you but you really piss me off, go watch your Cherry Ferretti or something thats just as stupid. The past 40min of his presentation has just been over one thing, that is the concept of "infinite".
kilikadork 1 year ago
Count the number of times where he says "like, oh my god!"
Real physicists do real research with particle accelerators, spectrometers and hours of tedious calculation. This guy looks (and sounds) like he does all his 'research' with a bong and some pills.
All you need to do is make up any science-y sounding shit and say it with enough confidence; there will be no shortage of braindead morons who'll just assume 'you are too smart for them'.
Please stop giving this scam artist attention.
TinyCoconut 1 year ago 2
@TinyCoconut . study the pray coconut.. and keep repeating it. doesen't matter if you don't understand. you don't need it COCONUT!
ALGAMANCHANNEL 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut ..."hours of tedious calculation"? Isn't calculation done with a calculator these days?
Your second paragraph fairly describes why I would pay no attention to your post. Everything in physics and math aside, his simple explanation of the pyramids and what the "phd's or "academics" official explanation for them are, make the side your are putting yourself on, look near retarded. Backwoods 2 digit IQ virginia hillsmen can understand it's wrong. Egyptologists are right?
999silverrush 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut ..."hours of tedious calculation"? Isn't calculation done with a calculator these days?
Your second paragraph fairly describes why I would pay no attention to your post. Everything in physics and math aside, his simple explanation of the pyramids and what the "phd's or "academics" official explanation for them are, make the side your are putting yourself on, look near retarded. Backwoods 2 digit IQ virginia hillsmen can understand it's wrong. So egyptologists are correct, right?
999silverrush 1 year ago
@999silverrush So do you know what a calculation is? Tends to be a bit more to it than the kind of thing you'd use a calculator for.
Don't let a lack of imagination convince you that all academics do is invent school textbook explanations, as Haramein would love you to believe. He's massively naive, and relies on massive naivety in his audience.
And of course they oblige.
EleanorHandcart 1 year ago
@EleanorHandcart "Don't let a lack of imagination convince you..." What is this 1984 newspeak? "academics do is invent school textbook explanations...." so called "race-based slavery", WW1, Korea, Vietnam gulfoftonkin, panama, grenada, iran, pro-sadaam funding, wmd's, "forensic science"... "and of course they oblige"... the academics must have researched those things on a monday. Even if you had an iq of 190, you would still be dumb.
999silverrush 1 year ago
@999silverrush er.... oh, I see, you're a senseless nutter. Never mind then.
EleanorHandcart 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut Which one of his arguments don't you like? Seems like you just don't like what he's saying? Or maybe you don't like him?
blasphemylolz 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut
u sound like an iluminati agent dude, when u make fun of him, u make fun of all the ancient civilisations , and without the sience of the ancient civilisation, u donkeys from west wouldent have SHIT, JACK SHIT
thank the Eyptian the greeks, the persian, the chinese the mayan the indian
u stupied white boy, we are at least 1000 years ahead of u , when it comes to the sience of energy, u just re define some of the old formulas WE GAVE URE U
u need to shut da fuck up =) and listen
BenjiPars 1 year ago
@BenjiPars no doubt
Meriamen 1 year ago
@Meriamen . thanx people need to speak when these white devils talkes to much, when these white trash people dont understand, they turn to their ego and jeliousy
this is the tradtion of the white man. 1 love, keep up the good work, keep trusting in God / Peace om Iran
BenjiPars 1 year ago
@Meriamen
I am goving to give a term which u can use :
we have bio tech - tech and high tech
Anicent people used bio tech, which means, they understood the powers from within.
the white man, use tech and high tech. but tech and high tech can only explain what u can observe with ure eyez ,and with the help of machines.
with bio tech u just need to tune in , in the planets electro magnetic field, sience electro magnetics has memory, theirfore it will reavil many secrets. They know this !
BenjiPars 1 year ago
@BenjiPars thank you for that currently some troll keeps sending me messages about chemtrails not BEING REAL my god what is going to take to get rid of these devils. I want my planet back and I am willing to behead whoever to get it.
Meriamen 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut you dont have to be surrounded by recording equipment working within the boundries to come up with something new..sometimes brilliant people come along that tear the arse out of our known understanding by stepping away from conventional thinking..then theres people like you who will not believe an unconventional view like rats in a maze waiting for a corner so that they can change direction..wake up my friend theres a whole new world out there that isnt flat..peace light and love
scomberscombrus 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut Wow! Dear fellow YouTubian... :) Most of our current knowledge in mathematics and physics was discovered in the ancient times; the Greek contribution is taught at school for the most part, like Thales, Pythagoras, Aristotle (yes, him too), or Archimedes to name a few. Those people were not researchers - they were THINKERS! By thinking logically & following a certain reasonable pattern, i.e. like Descartes in 'Meditations,' they came up with what we know today as fact! Without CERN!
IDeeAlystiQ 1 year ago
I LOVE YOU HARAMEIN !!! :-)
elgyn11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
first off chocoass if phisics was were it should be you would have to worry about real mutants running around and second if everyone thats disputing this guy why dont they come up with better theorys to beat the belief systems already proposed.its like when i teach guitar there are myriad better methods out there that you discover the more you break down a theory.its a hell of an awsome thing hes doing 'imagine greater'DICKHEADS.GO FUCK YOURSELF NERDS
ninjafretshadow 2 years ago
all the smart guys come here it and lay it out for everyone on YouTube
dasgroover 2 years ago
maybe we are just players in a game.
thecitywalls 2 years ago
5:30 ish haha. this is way small.
TheUFOeffect 2 years ago
Evasius, my attitude to nassims videos comes from actually knowing physics. Here's a simple example;- inform yourself on the Planck Length, then look at nassims ridiculous claim that this is where "the universe goes to that small then stops". In fact, Planck Units are a non-anthropocentric scale of measurement, physics doesn't "stop" there at all.
zybyl 2 years ago 2
Maybe the universe is the result of a fallacy.
JarethGT 2 years ago
@zybyl The reason why this seems logical to people is they have not studied the basic physics. Then you have this guy Nassim who uses the words in physics and doesn't really understand it. He is then trying to explain the physics he doesn't understand, to people who have no base at all in physics. Its pretty funny. Watching these videos, I found way too many mistakes to even begin to comment on them. Its funny what people will believe in, if left to their own...
ghpink 1 year ago
@zybyl If you saw how he showed infinite boundaries in a circle, and noticed that he only used plancks constant as an example, not a rule, would you change your mind about what you think? In fact you just made nassim's lecture more credible! He is being sarcastic when he claims "the universe goes to that small and stops". How did you not notice that @5:50 ?
alexchubb8 1 year ago
A naive audience laughing at a delusional clown as he blunders thru a string of fallacies and misconceptions supposedly "overturning" established science. If only this audience would have armed themselves with some bona fide science before they turned up at this train wreck of a "lecture".
zybyl 2 years ago 2
I'm surprised you made it to part 6 with an attitude like that.
Evasius 2 years ago
Comment removed
dasgroover 2 years ago
@zybyl yes, can you even imagine him presenting this talk in a seminar of trained, educated and experienced mathematicians and physicists? I'd give him 10 minutes before he was left talking to himself (and, no, it wouldn't be because he was challenging their ideas...). A charismatic delusional suffering from a classic Dunning-Kruger effect.
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 Dunning-Kruger effect. Mmm, thanks for introducing me to that :-)
I've started to realise how many people seem to suffer from a pathological inability to acknowledge the limits of their understanding of some topic. Haramein is a clear example, as are those who spout forth about the 'mainstream' and feel they're actually debating with scientists.
There's something badly wrong with education if it's so unacceptable to admit a lack of understanding that people are driven to this.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon A very interesting point. Perhaps it's a subtle effect of an information-rich culture. Simple ignorance may cause a guilt reaction in many of us. Maybe 'not knowing' is seen as some shameful measure in an era when the sum of human knowledge is within easy reach. Many feel we ought to know on a subliminal level, or we're lessened in some way. Knowing is success, while unknowing is failure. So many embrace and inflate their sense of the first, and deny the other...
steeltable218 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Mastery of a subject, like an instrument, can take decades. Many, like Haramein, want to take a quick-fix-short-cut past the basics and expect the serious-minded to take him seriously. Like a toddler who's learned the xylophone trying to take apart a Mozart composition. But this kind of hubris is an insult to the majesty of nature and the millions of brilliant individuals who have dedicated their lives to uncovering its workings. But we can dismiss all that as 'mainstream' can't we?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@zybyl He makes good points, kinda hurts doesn't it? It'l be okay man, you'll survive :)
blasphemylolz 1 year ago
@blasphemylolz I don't think zybyl is worried about surviving. I think he's just saying what a number of people have also observed - that your guy's talking shite.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@zybyl you talke alot of shit bro, u need to shut a hell up and listen, imagination is the key to all reallity, thats step one ;)
BenjiPars 1 year ago
They should put THIS stuff up in movie theatres as opposed to the next X-Men nonsense film :P
chocoboasylum 2 years ago
In context to the calculation of infinity: Quantum physics and general relativity are like 2 circles, each resounding within each other to infinity.......'we' the observers of both realities of concepts are what links both circles together contecting the observation of infinity : )
Peace
joethepro3 2 years ago
The problem with some guys is they always makes a fraud on purpose (in financial system, in physics) to achive POWER.
We need more people like him to change this world.
pitbbpl 2 years ago
Why does it keep cuttn offf at times? its gettnin annoying...like he sayin things than it cuts off than it goes back to it..
icemanguitar 2 years ago
He is far more advance than other scientist and he keep this so simple!
BinAlladin 2 years ago
@BinAlladin lol you loser. Its so simple because you have a simple mind and its simply not true. If it makes sense to you, you need to head back to school for a grade 10 to 12 physics course. You would then see what nonsense it really is..
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink you piece of shit....it´s nonsense for you "scientific" mind, just shows how open minded perhaps you are or you do not understand at all ....
BinAlladin 1 year ago
@BinAlladin Thanks for the intelligent comment :) It makes sense that people like you, would be into this stuff. Does it make you feel smart?
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink no, I´m not smart. I think you are much smarter then me...and I´m very thankful for what I have and will always share it with other....
BinAlladin 1 year ago
@BinAlladin yeah just like you shared it with me, with your shit comment. Well, I dont want to share your shit :)
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink are you still in kindergarten and playing with your toys??
BinAlladin 1 year ago
his ideas on a total equilibrium vacuum is actually in accordance to the zero-vector systems that zero-point energy researchers have. Basically its untapped source of infinite energy that can solve the world's energy problems, its free energy for all.
jimboybaboy 2 years ago
Just Brilliant...
Gugamixxx 2 years ago
this man is brilliant !
cefrio 2 years ago
I love this guy. I want to see a character in a movie (maybe done by depp) inspired by him. its like comic genius waiting to be exploited. and the reason I laugh is because I know how right he is. its damn great.
HuckleberrySlim 3 years ago
He mentioned Burning Man! lol, sounds like he's utilized more than just his 3rd eye to visualize the infinite enternal!
ntelekt1 3 years ago