ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 You idiot the entropy argument comes from the much abused Four Laws of Thermodynamics. Those are ONLY applicable to heat transfer in CLOSED systems. The universe, sadly for your argument, is not a closed system. Nor does your entropy arguments have to do with heat transfer (the THERMO in thermodynamics.)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Holy mother of nothing. This was one of the funniest creationist fails I heard in my life and I thought to assume that so called "evolutionists" believe that humans evolved from rocks could not be topped. Silly me assuming that human stupidity is not bottomless...
Fucking christ on the cross I mountain dew just covered my keyboard and monitor when I heard the nostril catching on fire shit. Just....words....my brain.....owwwww
i thought lying was a sin? why does every creationist "scientist" fucking lie. and they're not even good lies, if you're older than 20 months how could you believe this shit? flaming nostrils... fuck...
@HimesInu Exactly! I get my information on God and ancient aliens from History channel documentaries! If they're on History channel, they must be true!
if someone brings up this crap about breathing quickly sets your nose on fire just tell them to test it. if they don't you say it's false then and if they do you get the joy of seeing someone looking really stupid
Paleoanthropologist Lee Berger in 2008 found the full form fossils of 2 primates. They were dated 2 million y/o. They are clear evidence of transitional fossils. They have the qualities homo Erectus and Primate. Small brain, long arms and smaller human like hands. New Species: Sadiva. They've been casted and dispersed throughout the scientific community. They are being studied and verified by hundreds of paleontologists, biologists and anthropologists. Here is 100% undeniable proof.
There was a time period where insects were rather large(not necessarily this large), MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO. Which would still make this a creationist fail.
@jimmyphonghater first off , yes they were this large only due to the fact that insects sizes are only limited by the amount of available oxygen in the atmosphere since (and this was mentioned in the video too) they take oxygen in through their skin. Insects are one of the few organisms which function in this way so we would still have had "normal" sized other forms of life and giant insects (and of course the Dinos).
@fraglimat Only the Picard double facepalm while doing the Picard maneuver and following the Borg sphere in the temporal anomaly would suffice for that.
just for info, the Mkele-Mbembe mentioned in this vid was discovered to be a species of dwarf rhino, oddly enough, this was discovered by zoologisits using the ground breaking technique of showing pictures of animals to the pigmys and seeing which one they pointed at and said thats a Mkele-Mbembe, with that stunning piece of eye whitness testimony, its pretty clear the Mkele-Mbembe is a Rhino, not a dinosaur.
@GregJPreece oo, he doesnt explain that, but hes on the wrong track anyway, before the ice age floods, there was a lot more ozone due to biomass. Experiments have shown that creatures that grow in an environment with a highly protective ozone layer grow much larger and live much longer due to added protection from the suns rays. There is a documentary vid on youtube about.
Is he confusing horestails and cattails? Because there is a big difference (like confusing a sponge and a starfish level of difference). I have heard of the former and never of the later.
@logsdonj Probably the creationists who disagree with the creationists who came up with these insane claims. You know, because creationists aren't all carbon copies of eachother, just like scientists aren't all agreeing with eachother on every single scientific theory ever conceived.
To this day I still laugh hysterically whenever I hear him say their nostril caught on fire. Even though I watched this multiple times and I know its coming, it still catches me off-guard to hear something that absolutely bat-shit insane come out of someones mouth with such a serious, grave, deadpan tone...
Hilarious, absolutely hilarious potholer54, i don't know about a tortoise but you can see a leatherback seaturtle, aren't those like 12foot or fairly close to that?
ok let's get this straight, God creates dinosaurs, God floods earth, flood reduces oxygen in atmosphere, dinosaurs die due to lack of oxygen therefore God killed the dinosaurs!?
@TheKab112 It makes me feel better because I can see a 'doctor' trying to make this argument and realize that even if I had gotten that educated and spent thousands of dollars doing it, I could still be just that stupid. I don't feel like I wasted time on what I did instead.
@sweetmikser Why did you put the video "Atheist and Darwinist Logical FAILS" in this video response and then block comments? If your going to try and challenge atheism with every straw man you can pull out your hat don't you at least want some kind of response? Or are you afraid that every argument you make would be torn to pieces and blocking the comments is the only thing stopping that. Based on your comments to Potholer54 your research is non-existant, ignorance is the only argument you have.
@mancno1 I know this one,Because the first rule of being a creationist is to embrace censorship with all your heart,Then proceed to shutout and ignore any and all comments exposing your incorrect statements.
If you've done the following you are now certified to be a creationist.
- it is entirely plausible that replicating entities can come to exist through chance. Even if very unlikely it only needs to happen once before they will become more and more numerous.
- what is the aim of your Mars argument? Are you anticipating the discovery of life on Mars and ensuring that this isn't taken to disprove creationism? There are plenty of existing reasons why creationism is an invalid theory- you should focus on those.
- Einstein didn't believe in God- any quotes where he mentions God is using it as a personification of nature.
- the only limit to evolution is time. Species can become divided for many reasons- physical incompatibility (great Danes and chiuauas), natural divides (earthquakes/floods) or simply migration.
@Mogley52 Maybe over the course of millions of years, You will evolve in to shit flinging masturbating monkey. And you don't think we came from primates. WE HAVE NO CHOICE LEFT BUT TO INSULT YOU. Tell God to tongue my balls!
You had me until you mentioned reindeer I know for a fact Rudolph is real this past Christmas I performed a scientific experiment.I went out hunting brought the deer home strung it up and painted it's nose red and told the kids no Santa this year i got Rudolph,after being chased around with pitchforks and crosses i can say flying reindeer are real.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
@Mogley52 get a life and take your fucking bible and role it into a dildo and shove it into ur ass. Dont take up the whole fucking comment section with ur uneducated presumptions, dont go making up quotes and saying stuff that you really have no idea about, quoting einstein, thats a million years too early for a creationist. The 'quote' that you are using can be the same for God, did he come out of my ass and make the universe? or was it the invisible unicorn in my backyard?
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 But the beginning is not your God. There is no way to prove that. I can say that an alien named Ted accidentally created universe after blowing his apartment while trying to make beer. You cannot disprove it since you and I weren't around during then but I know it happened since Ted told me in a dream and I have faith. You have your crazy ideas and I have mine. But other religions have their own ideas on the universe's origins and you cannot prove any of them wrong either.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
INFORMATION ARGUMENT NOT DESTROYED: The genetic chemicals exist in all species to make new genetic information but that doesn't mean random rearrangement of those chemicals by the environment will produce new genetic information anymore than randomly rearranging the letters in a love story novel will change it into a book on astronomy, and if the book were living the process of such random rearrangement would kill it! Read my popular Internet article, HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
I HAVE GIVEN OVER A DOZEN LECTURES defending scientific creationism before evolutionist science faculty and students at colleges. At the end, I would open up for questions, comments, rebuttals. The science faculty, for the most part, was silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true. Some in the science faculty offered tricky rebuttals and I successfully answered them. It's those who don't know enough science that I've found the most challenging to convince.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
@Mogley52 Your stupidity is overwhelming. Before you comment on evolution perhaps you should read a book or 10 so you have at least some understanding of what evolution is. Species didnt one day have no organs etc then the next spontaneously started evolving some. They already had basic methods of staying alive(eg photosynthesis) and over time their vital systems etc became more complex and efficient. It's also the evolution within species that leads to new species being formed
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Aside of the the obvious hilarious and ridiculous bit about spontaneous nasal combustion (and the fast that nasal passage size doesn't have THAT much of an impediment on breathing; just look at elephants...), the obvious flaw seem to be this:
... What did the flood do to get rid of all that oxygen, exactly?
Theist's exist to believe in, and spread lies. What other purpose do they fulfill? Remember the good old days when dinosaur bones were placed by Satan to make us think that the world was older than 6-7000 years? Why can't they just accept the truth, instead of making themselves look stupider every time science forces them to rethink their beliefs? Understanding is so much easier with the Imaginary Skyman and religious indoctrination out of the equation.
NOOOOOO, I'm imagining it! AHHHH!
facetiousbadger 1 hour ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 hours ago
@Mogley52 You idiot the entropy argument comes from the much abused Four Laws of Thermodynamics. Those are ONLY applicable to heat transfer in CLOSED systems. The universe, sadly for your argument, is not a closed system. Nor does your entropy arguments have to do with heat transfer (the THERMO in thermodynamics.)
facetiousbadger 1 hour ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE
Mogley52 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 4 hours ago
Holy mother of nothing. This was one of the funniest creationist fails I heard in my life and I thought to assume that so called "evolutionists" believe that humans evolved from rocks could not be topped. Silly me assuming that human stupidity is not bottomless...
TheLadyOfG 18 hours ago
A cockroach 18 inches long? Yeah it's called FALLOUT
beatboxpeej 23 hours ago
How would an 18 inch cockroach even get in somebody's cabinet?
belolacove 1 day ago
Hahahah this is like a Monty Python skit
tjmetaldrummer666 3 days ago 3
If this guy is a doctor, why are there still patients?
cbooth2004 6 days ago
@cbooth2004 lol!
aaronzvz 4 days ago
what a kent
marcobarros23 6 days ago
Fucking christ on the cross I mountain dew just covered my keyboard and monitor when I heard the nostril catching on fire shit. Just....words....my brain.....owwwww
jtheist32 1 week ago
I wanna breath fire.. *starts hyperventilating* *passes out*
chrism4n14 1 week ago
i thought lying was a sin? why does every creationist "scientist" fucking lie. and they're not even good lies, if you're older than 20 months how could you believe this shit? flaming nostrils... fuck...
emailtheoldies 1 week ago
Creationists really are the scum of the Earth.
werebee 1 week ago 2
Oh my fucking Thor (or which god you actually believe in)! Why was god so cruel to the dinosaurs and let their nostrils catch fire?
JeenaParadies 1 week ago 2
Dragons aren't real? But Animal Planet had a mockumentary about it a fews years ago.
HimesInu 1 week ago
@HimesInu Exactly! I get my information on God and ancient aliens from History channel documentaries! If they're on History channel, they must be true!
werebee 1 week ago
I FUCKING LOVE YOU! SUBSCRIBED!
TheVJackV 1 week ago
Its weird to me to hear these guys with British accents talking about measurements in inches and feet instead of in the metric system, hehe.
Grimtheorist 1 week ago
if someone brings up this crap about breathing quickly sets your nose on fire just tell them to test it. if they don't you say it's false then and if they do you get the joy of seeing someone looking really stupid
taylan637 1 week ago
The end was priceless.
MenwithHill 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
By far Potholer's funniest work. A gem.
kanojo1969 1 week ago
@kanojo1969
Lol. The comedic style reminds me of Monty Python a bit.
Mattm1986 1 week ago
I don't HAVE to imagine it .you gots pictures....gawrsh
thanksforthemessdick 1 week ago
God I fucking love British humor.
SeedsOfHatred 1 week ago
if dragons could breath fire they would die from it.
doombybbr 1 week ago
Comment removed
rijilfreekdaredevil 1 week ago
Flaming...nostril....OUCH! I thought the brain did not have any abilty to feel pain. I need some acetaminophen.
Jesses001 1 week ago
@490er None of it does, it's the cries of desperation as even the religions majority of the world grow more and more moderate.
AmericanAviator 1 week ago
Can you imagine creatards ever learning how to think? Well, just because I can imagine it, doesn't mean it's ever going to happen.
pirbird14 1 week ago
Monty python + High-Pitch voice + Fake experiments = WIN
MenwithHill 2 weeks ago in playlist Epic creationist fails of our time
Probably the funniest video on youtube.
InsanoGerbil 2 weeks ago
Ball park figure, you would need to breath about Mach 5 in order to ignite... Of course your nose would shock wave at mach 1
mrjohnfish 2 weeks ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAA
jplb96 2 weeks ago
Paleoanthropologist Lee Berger in 2008 found the full form fossils of 2 primates. They were dated 2 million y/o. They are clear evidence of transitional fossils. They have the qualities homo Erectus and Primate. Small brain, long arms and smaller human like hands. New Species: Sadiva. They've been casted and dispersed throughout the scientific community. They are being studied and verified by hundreds of paleontologists, biologists and anthropologists. Here is 100% undeniable proof.
paramattic70 2 weeks ago
@paramattic70 1 evidence isnt proof, but evol has a lot more.
animaljp3 1 week ago
thanks for mentioning that Serge Gainsbourg song.. been a long time since I gave it listen :)
rasoros 2 weeks ago
lol, can you imagine that?
maynard789 2 weeks ago
There was a time period where insects were rather large(not necessarily this large), MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO. Which would still make this a creationist fail.
jimmyphonghater 2 weeks ago 12
@jimmyphonghater first off , yes they were this large only due to the fact that insects sizes are only limited by the amount of available oxygen in the atmosphere since (and this was mentioned in the video too) they take oxygen in through their skin. Insects are one of the few organisms which function in this way so we would still have had "normal" sized other forms of life and giant insects (and of course the Dinos).
OkamsRazer 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
based on the battle between evolution and creation, check out our new sci fi movie EVOLUTION CREEK decide for yourself!
chauncyhead 2 weeks ago
pardon me while i burst into flames....
gotohellgooglization 2 weeks ago
This was superb. I tip my hat to you, sir.
WindmillStalker 2 weeks ago 2
can you imagine that.
breasthound 2 weeks ago
Okay, I'm back and I told the nostrils on fire story to one of my friend who's a biology student and she had a mental blue screen of death...
kalajel 2 weeks ago
Nostrils on fire? NOSTRILS ON FIRE!? I don't believe it; I finally found something so stupid that even a facepalm won't do...
kalajel 2 weeks ago
@kalajel What about the picard double facepalm?
fraglimat 2 weeks ago
@fraglimat Only the Picard double facepalm while doing the Picard maneuver and following the Borg sphere in the temporal anomaly would suffice for that.
kalajel 2 weeks ago
I fucking LOVE how you talk to these people in that high pitched voice!
HRRyan2 2 weeks ago
Ugh... Why do creationists even bother with science. Just why...
ChainsawVsGod 2 weeks ago
@ChainsawVsGod Well, they don't really, since they have no clue what fact or logic means, except for the pounding headache they get when trying it.
fraglimat 2 weeks ago
But, but....The Flintstones is Historical Docu-drama-comedy !!
Urfullobull 3 weeks ago
OMGosh!!! I was giggling like a schoolgirl though out the entire video. *Subscribe*
RosyBibliophile 3 weeks ago
just for info, the Mkele-Mbembe mentioned in this vid was discovered to be a species of dwarf rhino, oddly enough, this was discovered by zoologisits using the ground breaking technique of showing pictures of animals to the pigmys and seeing which one they pointed at and said thats a Mkele-Mbembe, with that stunning piece of eye whitness testimony, its pretty clear the Mkele-Mbembe is a Rhino, not a dinosaur.
Shofoxy 3 weeks ago
Does he ever explain how a flood is supposed to have changed the atmosphere and removed a large percentage of the planet's oxygen?
GregJPreece 3 weeks ago 2
@GregJPreece oo, he doesnt explain that, but hes on the wrong track anyway, before the ice age floods, there was a lot more ozone due to biomass. Experiments have shown that creatures that grow in an environment with a highly protective ozone layer grow much larger and live much longer due to added protection from the suns rays. There is a documentary vid on youtube about.
Shofoxy 3 weeks ago
Is he confusing horestails and cattails? Because there is a big difference (like confusing a sponge and a starfish level of difference). I have heard of the former and never of the later.
SephieRothe 3 weeks ago
59 people hit the dislike button? Can YOU IMAGINE that?
logsdonj 3 weeks ago 40
@logsdonj This is the best comment on a video i have seen in a long time. LOL
Antimidation 2 weeks ago
@logsdonj but there's no f~*%$g carbon in it!
guwest2 2 weeks ago
@logsdonj Probably the creationists who disagree with the creationists who came up with these insane claims. You know, because creationists aren't all carbon copies of eachother, just like scientists aren't all agreeing with eachother on every single scientific theory ever conceived.
DrMadolite 1 week ago
@logsdonj I can't a imagine that! Don't ask me!
TheVJackV 1 week ago
@logsdonj
No! I can't imagine that!
thegameulost 1 week ago
@logsdonj
NOOOOO
Confusedfurry 1 week ago
@logsdonj that would frighten the life out of me!
rooftopsniper13 3 days ago
OH MY GOD! With the nostrils catching fire, my jaw hit the floor!
kyral210 3 weeks ago
Just makin' shit up for jesus! Luv it!
almightycatman 3 weeks ago
Oh geez, listening to that song made my pubes AND nostrils spontaneously combust.
SgtTwinkleToes 3 weeks ago
the start to this vid just made me laugh .... great job :) !!!!
Grimmy67 3 weeks ago
Notice how this guy said the dinosaurs' nostrils are not ADAPTED to a low oxygen environment? cough
DeinosDinos 3 weeks ago
To this day I still laugh hysterically whenever I hear him say their nostril caught on fire. Even though I watched this multiple times and I know its coming, it still catches me off-guard to hear something that absolutely bat-shit insane come out of someones mouth with such a serious, grave, deadpan tone...
soasertsus 3 weeks ago
Please try not to make these videos so damn funny. Listening on my headphones at work and laughing out loud are a bad combination.
VideoKRadioStar 3 weeks ago
Holy shit. Religion is silly as it is, but creationism is bat-shit CRAZY.
MrMetallidude 3 weeks ago
I was eating a skittle and I choked on skittle-saliva when he said their nostrils would catch on fire.
GuacamoleKun 3 weeks ago
Richard Kent, Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, Kirk Cameron... Something about the letter ''K'' makes people retarded.
Reasonwillwin 3 weeks ago 2
Mrs Anne Elk (Miss). You have a new theory about the brontosaurus.
dproctor18 3 weeks ago
hahaha, good one, thanks for the video
echafaud 3 weeks ago
At 4:09 I facepalmed so quickly that my hand caught on fire. I guess that proves the existence of wizards?
Quintopex 3 weeks ago
My brain. My poor brain.
I recommend having 4:05 - 4:11 be reclassified as "cruel and unusual punishment".
gimmethegepgun 3 weeks ago
Wow. Well done sir. I laughed so hard my nostrils got a little toasty.
movalboy 3 weeks ago
hearing these guys reminds me of a dump i took the other day.
TheMike5790 3 weeks ago
Nostrils catching on fire from breathing too heavily. I have never heard that paticaular bit of nonsense before.
MisterTutor2010 1 month ago in playlist Creationism Exposed #2
Hilarious, absolutely hilarious potholer54, i don't know about a tortoise but you can see a leatherback seaturtle, aren't those like 12foot or fairly close to that?
shakeval 1 month ago
wow! this guy is a douch....frikkin creationalists!!!!!!
deadcopperhead 1 month ago
Don't make me imagine that. Soooo funny!!!
gregg4 1 month ago
can you imagine that?
hostyle0 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wait! Wouldn't the humans have been in proportion to the bugs? Then the bugs would have been proportionately the same size they are today.
baldurus1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wait! Wouldn't the humans have been in proportion to the bugs? Then the bugs would have been proportionately the same size they are today.
baldurus1 1 month ago
Wait! Wouldn't the humans have been in proportion to the bugs? Then the bugs would have been proportionately the same size they are today.
baldurus1 1 month ago
I've had five glasses of wine... and I'm still caught agape by his theory that tiny nostrils would catch on fire.
Teastudent 1 month ago
The best so far. Thanks Peter Hadfield. Thadfield.
Zierlerpin 1 month ago
I paused at 4:15 and laughed for about three minutes straight.... I can't breath.... OH NO MY NOSTRILS WILL CATCH ON FIRE!!!!!!
hahahahahaaaaaa....
mikeandrewp 1 month ago
ok let's get this straight, God creates dinosaurs, God floods earth, flood reduces oxygen in atmosphere, dinosaurs die due to lack of oxygen therefore God killed the dinosaurs!?
Wow God's a grade A prick
Darconda90 1 month ago
Haha love it!
Peaceeverbody 1 month ago
Fuck me, I haven't laughed this hard since I was 7 and pissed myself at school.
beatsdown 1 month ago
It's not only awesome science, it's awesome comedy. Thanks, Potholer54, for making my life better!
yvranx 1 month ago
Wow, those evolutionists are stupid, aren't they?
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick ....... i hope your joking, fucking incest redneck.
Ipowne3g 3 weeks ago
lol'd hard
BrendanIsCool 1 month ago
Whenever I need a laugh because I am depressed, I just watch one of these videos and I feel better.
cloudstone123 1 month ago 42
@cloudstone123 Really? They always rather depress me.. that people are this ignorant.
TheKab112 4 weeks ago
@TheKab112 It makes me feel better because I can see a 'doctor' trying to make this argument and realize that even if I had gotten that educated and spent thousands of dollars doing it, I could still be just that stupid. I don't feel like I wasted time on what I did instead.
cloudstone123 4 weeks ago
This world would be so much more fun if creationists were right!
tdurran 1 month ago
How does a cockroach that is 18inch long get into the cupboard underneath my kitchen sink in the first place??? Perhaps God put it there???
XR8xSHOCKWAVE 1 month ago
@sweetmikser Why did you put the video "Atheist and Darwinist Logical FAILS" in this video response and then block comments? If your going to try and challenge atheism with every straw man you can pull out your hat don't you at least want some kind of response? Or are you afraid that every argument you make would be torn to pieces and blocking the comments is the only thing stopping that. Based on your comments to Potholer54 your research is non-existant, ignorance is the only argument you have.
mancno1 1 month ago
@mancno1 I know this one,Because the first rule of being a creationist is to embrace censorship with all your heart,Then proceed to shutout and ignore any and all comments exposing your incorrect statements.
If you've done the following you are now certified to be a creationist.
MonTag666 1 month ago
@MonTag666 :)
sexyxrs 1 month ago
Let this video be an inspiration to all rational medical students, just remember when times get rough, this guy did it
dopeasfuckk 1 month ago
@Mogley52
- it is entirely plausible that replicating entities can come to exist through chance. Even if very unlikely it only needs to happen once before they will become more and more numerous.
- what is the aim of your Mars argument? Are you anticipating the discovery of life on Mars and ensuring that this isn't taken to disprove creationism? There are plenty of existing reasons why creationism is an invalid theory- you should focus on those.
DaveUK84 1 month ago
@Mogley52
Wow, you're annoying.
- Einstein didn't believe in God- any quotes where he mentions God is using it as a personification of nature.
- the only limit to evolution is time. Species can become divided for many reasons- physical incompatibility (great Danes and chiuauas), natural divides (earthquakes/floods) or simply migration.
DaveUK84 1 month ago
"Spontaneous combustus nostrolie" lmfao XD
MrAdampersian 1 month ago
Very Monty Python-esque
Good video regardless
sol3a1 1 month ago 49
@sol3a1 you say that like its a bad thing!
vertigo0331 2 weeks ago
@vertigo0331: Not at all now go away or I shall taunt you for a 2nd time!
sol3a1 2 weeks ago
@Mogley52 Maybe over the course of millions of years, You will evolve in to shit flinging masturbating monkey. And you don't think we came from primates. WE HAVE NO CHOICE LEFT BUT TO INSULT YOU. Tell God to tongue my balls!
paramattic70 1 month ago
0:56
"Well that's what the fossil record actually shows"
"I don't care"
This sums up something...
clubpenguindino 1 month ago 2
You had me until you mentioned reindeer I know for a fact Rudolph is real this past Christmas I performed a scientific experiment.I went out hunting brought the deer home strung it up and painted it's nose red and told the kids no Santa this year i got Rudolph,after being chased around with pitchforks and crosses i can say flying reindeer are real.
philosophicalreason 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 1 month ago
@Mogley52 get a life and take your fucking bible and role it into a dildo and shove it into ur ass. Dont take up the whole fucking comment section with ur uneducated presumptions, dont go making up quotes and saying stuff that you really have no idea about, quoting einstein, thats a million years too early for a creationist. The 'quote' that you are using can be the same for God, did he come out of my ass and make the universe? or was it the invisible unicorn in my backyard?
chuckn0rris100 1 month ago
@chuckn0rris100 roll*
chuckn0rris100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 1 month ago
@Mogley52 But the beginning is not your God. There is no way to prove that. I can say that an alien named Ted accidentally created universe after blowing his apartment while trying to make beer. You cannot disprove it since you and I weren't around during then but I know it happened since Ted told me in a dream and I have faith. You have your crazy ideas and I have mine. But other religions have their own ideas on the universe's origins and you cannot prove any of them wrong either.
XxI3ioHazardxX 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 1 month ago
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 1 month ago
@Mogley52 RETAAAAAAARD
Reasonwillwin 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INFORMATION ARGUMENT NOT DESTROYED: The genetic chemicals exist in all species to make new genetic information but that doesn't mean random rearrangement of those chemicals by the environment will produce new genetic information anymore than randomly rearranging the letters in a love story novel will change it into a book on astronomy, and if the book were living the process of such random rearrangement would kill it! Read my popular Internet article, HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 1 month ago
I HAVE GIVEN OVER A DOZEN LECTURES defending scientific creationism before evolutionist science faculty and students at colleges. At the end, I would open up for questions, comments, rebuttals. The science faculty, for the most part, was silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true. Some in the science faculty offered tricky rebuttals and I successfully answered them. It's those who don't know enough science that I've found the most challenging to convince.
Mogley52 1 month ago
Did he really say hard breathing cause fire...???
Well less sex then.
S00rabh 2 months ago
bloody hilarious xD
geyza0711 2 months ago
another great video, lmao
AngstromJohnny 2 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52
Peer revwied material or GTFO.
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Your stupidity is overwhelming. Before you comment on evolution perhaps you should read a book or 10 so you have at least some understanding of what evolution is. Species didnt one day have no organs etc then the next spontaneously started evolving some. They already had basic methods of staying alive(eg photosynthesis) and over time their vital systems etc became more complex and efficient. It's also the evolution within species that leads to new species being formed
hawkins1905 2 months ago
@hawkins1905
I think Mogley52 is a bot. He spams the same message on every video.
Atriviality 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 2 months ago
Aside of the the obvious hilarious and ridiculous bit about spontaneous nasal combustion (and the fast that nasal passage size doesn't have THAT much of an impediment on breathing; just look at elephants...), the obvious flaw seem to be this:
... What did the flood do to get rid of all that oxygen, exactly?
TheBanile 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This was absolutely hilarious. Thumbs up.
slashingraven 2 months ago
Theist's exist to believe in, and spread lies. What other purpose do they fulfill? Remember the good old days when dinosaur bones were placed by Satan to make us think that the world was older than 6-7000 years? Why can't they just accept the truth, instead of making themselves look stupider every time science forces them to rethink their beliefs? Understanding is so much easier with the Imaginary Skyman and religious indoctrination out of the equation.
TheCrimsonification 2 months ago
I'm still pissing myself at this video over 4 months later. Thanks again!
xtro1969 2 months ago
I wish we still had the star rating because this would have definitely earned about 10 :) Made me actually Laugh out Loud!
lilredfilmgeek 2 months ago