ROFL Was this white shirt kid for real?! Talk about denying freaking common sense! Hovind's point was perfect: If you had a math book that stated 2+2 equals 5 in it, would you not want that to be corrected? Basically, this kid's response was "Yes, because it promotes creativity." or whatever crap he thought he was saying. Yeah, creativity for crack heads. Freakin grow up, kids! That's all I got to say about that.
The kid in the white shirt and blue cap is probably the worst debater of all time "so called lies", Now HOW STUPID do you have to be to not realise its a lie? Look it up, if its bullshit, DONT TEACH IT. I could say, swallowing spit over long periods of time causes cancer, how does that help us cure cancer? ITS NOT TRUE..... I'm starting to wonder if natural selection really does work, we somehow managed to breed ourselves stupider.
Amazing how WEAK the arguments from the students are - they had NOTHING! Just goes to show how shaky the ground is under the theory of evolution. It just needs to be given a bit of a push and it will topple. Scientists, however, want to keep their job/funding/position.
Again he does this comparison to non-living things. Similarities in bonestructures supports evolution. But Hovind tries to compare this fact to cars. Cars don't reproduce, how can it be so hard to see?
@GoaHead80 what he is getting at is similar doesnt mean same. for instance a housecat has 4 legs, an alligator also has 4 legs. all he is saying is that rather than saying they evolved from the same source is that they were designed by the same "designer". in the same sense having triangular wheels for a car wouldnt work too well. what it means is that although they are similar it might just mean god in this case saw it fit that the design of these bonestructures was ideal for the functions.
@Falcondick69 This shows again that you guys don't understand how evolution works. It's not only the fact that the animals have 4 legs that leads to support evolution. I understand that you are trying to say that cars and skateboards both have wheels and because they were designed, so must animals. However, because they don't reproduce it's a bad comparison. And there are also genetics and other things that you totally ignore.
@Falcondick69 I'm not a scientist, so my own explanation is not as good as a scientist. But here's a link where you can see how different species have homologies of the forelimbs. You should also read about evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles. And think about this: Science is based on testable predictions and explanations, while creation is based on beliefs and absolutely NO research.
@Falcondick69 First of all it's not a belief. Scientists make the observations and predictions. You can't expect everyone who trusts the scientific method and have a basic understanding of science to know every detail in every aspect of science. I can defend my view, but looking at a scientific article will be better if you want a detailed explanation. "Major fail".. How mature.
Now I expect you to refute evolution of mammalian auditory ossicle, if not I assume you can't defend your own belief..
I forgot to paste the link earlier: wwwdotbritannicadotcom/EBchecked/media/45466/Homologies-of-the-forelimb-among-vertebrates-giving-evidence-for-evolution
3) 'It's not true that the Embryo has gill slits'. They're actually referred to as Pharyngeal Pouches and they are present in all Vertebrate Embryos. These all form from the same pre-cursor tissue, the Neural Crest.
4) The four limb structures don't prove Evolution they support it. It doesn't really support ID, because this is an Apomorphic characteristic and evidence of a Nested Set. Using human enterprise as the example you can easily see that 'design' generally creates in non-nested sets.
How can you observe a rock producing anything today. Oh yes it has to rain on the rock for millions and millions of years. (Sounds like a galaxy far far away).
State education is about being a consumer, not a critical thinker. Remembering and reciting what is taught as fact is indoctrination, not education. As soon as these students are challenged they turn to logical fallacies, emotional outbursts or irrelevant analogies.
these are the same little evolutionist shits that go around on youtube and comment things like... ''your i.q is low and DONT UNDERSTAND EVOLUTION!!'' LOL what are we teaching these kids??? seriously there is a big problem here.
@hudfadz Programming, backed by a supposed intellectual superiority. The plain fact is, these evolution believing indivduals automatically discount what they call "creationist science" because they claim it to be biased, whilst believing "evolutionary science" which they automatically believe is true. That is a logical fallacy and a product of indoctrination. When a mind is deprogrammed there is necessarily emotional trauma due to a dramatic paradigm shift.
wow cannot believe these arguments these kids are presenting.. they are stubborn, they just want to be right even though they are clearly wrong... Put lies in the textbooks because or else there wont be any content... hmmm wonderful argument
LOL The satanists working on youtube for the new world order / new age will have a hard time protecting their evolution theory here! How could they even think protecting those students who gets knocked down so easily by Kent Hovind. Its incredible! Those are university students!??
@axe414 Yes SOME of these students are out-debated easily by Hovind. He is a practiced debater and these young kids are STUDENTS in their early 20's. You only have to be at college for a day to be a student.
... and SATANISTS?!?!? everyone who believes in evolution is a satanist? Don't you at least have to believe in Satan to be a satanist?
We see light from stars a billion light years away and date trees to over 10,000 years just by counting the rings and he thinks the earth is 6,000 years old!
@swilson3d ''everyone who believes in evolution is a satanist?'' Have I ever said that? By the way those students have been powned by Hovind :P Because they have NO arguments! You also have no arguments and by the way I don't believe a word out of your mouth because you put words in my mouth and I do not trust someone who lies to try to prove me wrong :). ''dated trees to over 10,000 years'' With the same fake techniques Hovind explained?? :P
@axe414 Have you ever said that? - This is what you said :: "LOL The satanists working on youtube for the new world order / new age will have a hard time protecting their evolution theory here!"
You talk about Satanists and their 'evolution theory'
So yeah, you kinda said that.
As for the students having no argument, I don't know that it falls to 20-year-old college students to defend science that is accepted by 95% of all scientists. Their debate abilities are irrelevant.
@swilson3d Wow You are good to twist words out of my mouth! First, All satanists believes in evolution. You want to know why? Because they believe they are evolving to become a God. I said that the satanists who are working on youtube (there is real satanists working on youtube) I haven't said that All evolutionist are satanists! I said All satanists are evolutionists! Do you know what Satanism is all about? Satanists are Humanists. Now do you understand or I have to make a drawing for you???
1> How can satanists believe in evolution if they must inherently believe that God is real?
2> Just because dendrochronology proves trees have a minimum age doesn't imply a maximum age
3> I think if scientists can split the atom and measure light speed, they can count tree rings and interpret the significance
4> first you say that a bunch teenagers can't defend evolution but then the opinions 95% of scientists have no bearing? Opinion of scientific majority is what peer review is about
1> Its clear you don't know anything about satanism... Search about the new age and Luciferianism. Its a good start.
2> LOL find me a tree that is 4.3 billion years :P. This argument dosen't make any sense and proves nothing.
3> Yep this is what YOU think. Dosen't prove evolution anyways
4> First of all you are inventing the ''95%''. This idea is in your mind. There is more people than you think that believes in creation. Even scientists. Majority dosen't mean truth.
1> I'll grant you I don't know much about satanism; I think I can safely say it's one of the rarest religions though and even more illogical than Christianity. Not worthy of research, and if they believe in Satan but still evolution, they are fools.
2> It proves that the earth is older than 6000 years, OTHER evidence proves 4.5 billion. Counting tree rings is hard to argue with though is the point.
3> see above
4> "95% of scientists" stat is cold hard fact, verifiable anywhere.
@swilson3d Well If you knew about Satanism and its influence in our society and especially in our governments and in secret societies (skull and bones is just one example) and its agenda, you would understand why evolution is a key in bringing about this new world order/ new age. All your arguments do not prove anything about evolution. I would suggest you to question your position on this subject. Your argument about the scientists simply prove even more to me that the conspiracy. Search plzz.
Saying that 95 % of scientists believe the same thing is so fallacious! By the way Evolution is not a science. Evolution only takes place in your mind! Believing you came from a Rock (This is what you should believe if you believe in evolution) is science??! by the way Hitler said this :
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”
If you want more information about the new world order, private message me.
@axe414 Look into dendrochronology. I just said that SIMPLY BY COUNTING TREE RINGS we can know the trees are over 10,000 years old.
Carbon dating confirms the same ages.
Hovind is a deceiver, using arguments he knows have been refuted. Scientists know for instance that shellfish and bottom feeders do not date accurately with carbon dating. The technique is not used there. Ocean dwellers in general date less accurately. Such is not the case with woolly mammoths, ancient humans and trees.
@swilson3d dendrochronology... First of all its possible to have more than 1 ring per year. Especially if the tree is really old. Second Does that prove evolution???!! Wait lets compare. Kent Hovind say the earth is 6000 years old. You say 4.3 billions years old... I think your argument is FOR the creationists! Thank you! By the way Carbon dating is unreliable plzz do not use this argument with me... You have NO arguments for evolution. Your fairy tale story of evolution is still dumb...
Dr Hovind made these Berkeley students look dumb. If he can explain his point in plain english and make it look simple how come evolutionist can't. They tend to explain their theories with long winded explanations whereas Dr Hovind can make me understand it in under an hour.
@swilson3d He is in jail because he exposed the New world order depopulation agenda. The IRS is the fraud. The whole economic system is the fraud. Rothchild, Rockefeller etc... You are a liar and probably working for the new world order. Plzz repent of your sin and come to Jesus...
@axe414 Out of his own mouth you hear him talk about his resentment of taxes and what they're used for many many times. He hasn't exposed anything but his own ignorance. Which Rothchild / Rockefeller are you talking about?
Have you ever considered how you sound from the point of view of someone accused of "working for the New World Order" who obviously knows that they don't work for any such thing?
He is in jail for not only not paying his taxes but lying to get out of paying them.
@swilson3d LOLL you say he lied about paying them. Have you ever maybe considered that maybe just maybe the IRS framed him??? By the way I retire my argument about the Doctor Hilpman. I don't think he works for the New world order. He was not good enough :P.
@axe414 Have you ever considered that people whose job it is to make sure people pay their taxes are more tipped off by his statements about tax resentment than they are about some depopulation conspiracy? How would a major depopulation happen and why? Why would the IRS be in on it?
Doesn't it make more sense that he simply committed a crime? People do that.
From sickeness cured to deformities fixed to injuries healed..... I HAVE SEEN AND PERFORMED THE SAME GOD GLORIFYING WORKS THAT JESUS PERFORMED. We are dealing with a massive massive massive God who is beyond our wildest dreams and comprehension. He is life and sustains all life and created all life and anyone who misses out on knowing him misses out on the real truth. CHRISTIANS WAKE UP! THERE IS SO MUCH MORE TO YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS; OTHERS WAKE UP! THERE IS A GOD WHO CARES 4 AND LOVES U
Personally I don't need the evidence to refute evolution because I know beyond all doubt that any evidence that does not stack up against the Gospel is therefore false. The only truth you will find is in the Gospel. How do I know? Because I have an active relationship with the only TRUE GOD and CREATOR. It is a tangible, real, physical, spiritual relationship. I feel his presence, have seen his presence, heard his voice, seen incredible miricles with my own eyes and continue to see them
@ginjaninja1988 Praise God forever.... once you had that experience it really does not matter what people say.. all we can do is shine our light a be the salt of the earth.. Praise God and great comment
Honestly some of these so called scientists of the future are real thick....... Just listening to their comments and arguements makes me laugh. They shoot themselves in the foot over and over again. I mean come on...... Not removing the lies from text books results in the betterment of education?? Honestly?? This is spiritual blindness, when folly and reason are thrown to the side and forgotten for the passion of a lost cause all so one may think he is not responsible to a God who will judge one
If you've never listened to a counter argument on this subject, then you have no right to say what is right and what isn't right. Listen to someone who has studied in this field, and you'll find that they make more sense than this guy. All of his facts can be proven wrong, and it's a shame that people are really believing what he's saying. Stop looking at arguments that agree with you, and look for ones that don't. Watch it with an open mind, and you never know, you might see some sense in them.
I love how Hovind pretends to be so much smarter than these people who are so much more equipped to answer questions about biology than him, and then he lands in the slammer for being a thief and a liar, yes he is indeed a GOOD CHRISTIAN MAN. Ramen my brothers
@LuckyIzzy659 Yeah how dare they question the established scientific fact of evolution that the overwhelming majority of the smartest people in the world agree on...yeah...dumb kids...
@LuckyIzzy659 Oh...lets shine some much needed perspective on the situation. If this guy believed that the earth was 6000 years old....then I along with yourself would also act as arrogant in my questing. BUT...you just might believe that lunacy. So lets say he was saying the earth is flat. There is almost as much evidence for the spherical shape of the earth as there is for evolution by natural selection. Just as there is for a whole slew of other accepted scientific facts. Like gravity.
@SSGWhit So you're saying evolution is a fact? Comparing it to gravity would make it a law. Did you even watch the video? I'm going to quote Honvind and say give me some evidence for evolution. That makes it a theory at the least. And a theory in science has to be thrown out if there's no evidence for it.
@SSGWhit Reputed creationist scientists proves time and time again that evolution is debunked. The Bible proved that the earth is round, scientists discovered it only a couple of centuries ago. Who was right first, the Bible or scientists?
@MrPieter1978 Proved? Proof in demonstrable or quantitative not insertion. When you say "Creationist Science"....give me one peer reviewed creationist paper that "debunks" evolution. Just one. Also your bible fallacy is not just false but concedes that you know very little of the bible....or arguments. So yeah...just post the link to one peer reviewed paper debunking Evolution....Right here.
@MrPieter1978 What proof have creationist offered? And how did the bible PROVE the earth was flat? Didn't the bible say the earth has four corners, indicating that the earth if flat and squareshaped? Perhaps you're one of the christian fanatics who's never read the bible.
@GoaHead80 Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@LuckyIzzy659 Hovind is the disrespectful one. he has his beliefs and do we, but he is calling our beliefs a lie. everyone has their own viewpoints and he needs to leave it that way. I hear hovind and he's being a dick to everyone
What religion are you speaking of, the religion of science and reason? If you must know I was raised a baptist, fortunately I came quickly to my senses. Ironically I was reading the bible that set the ball rolling toward agnosticism, which inevitably turned to atheism.
Did your parents farce Yah on you or something?
PS: this Yah you speak of must really be a pussy if he needs your sissy ass to defend him.
@ridgetownpimp He doesn't need me to defend Him. He needs me to introduce His Word to you, so that I can be the vessel through which He can come into your life.
lol Your funny I'v got to give you that, but your still wrong.
LIKE WHAT? you ask, well genetics for one. Genetics confirmed the theory of common descent, that is that all living things share common ancestors.
As for evolving from apes, I'v got news for you we (you included) have never stopped being apes.
Of cores we don't live in the bronze age, stupid. But that book you mentioned before, yeah that one. The book you get your "science" from, its a bronze age relic.
Like I said before its fucking stupid of you to assert something is true b/c 95% think that way. That simply means 95% of people still hold on to silly bronze age beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I also don't give a rat's ass what the bible says, I was simply saying just b/c the majority of people once believed the earth was flat did not make it so.
@ridgetownpimp A large amount of people believe in evolution, this doesn't make it right. They're holding on to pre-Atomic Age beliefs. I don't give a rat's ass what evolution says.
Also, the "flat earth" MYTH was invented in the last 1800s.
Yeah I think you'd find that those who "believe" in evolution generally are smart people. I would also say its F**KING STUPID of you to assert something is true or false based on how many followers it has.
Remember how the majority of people use to "believe" the world was flat? Of course that did not make it true, Did it?
@ All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'.Chirality
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!!!. Which is toxic to life!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do is copy information,thats not creating anything! Intelligence created life!
This level of stupidity can only be achieved through higher education.
spalmer718 1 month ago
ROFL Was this white shirt kid for real?! Talk about denying freaking common sense! Hovind's point was perfect: If you had a math book that stated 2+2 equals 5 in it, would you not want that to be corrected? Basically, this kid's response was "Yes, because it promotes creativity." or whatever crap he thought he was saying. Yeah, creativity for crack heads. Freakin grow up, kids! That's all I got to say about that.
MrKiddyIcarus 2 months ago in playlist More videos from jesusLostChildren777 4
This kid in the white shirt needs to get of the crack
LASuper38 2 months ago
I can't believe this kid thinks that gill slits in embryos is an observation! It's a lie! Why the heck would you want lies in the text?
TheIzkool 3 months ago
3:49 Dumbass gets owned.
MagnusCattus 5 months ago
The kid in the white shirt and blue cap is probably the worst debater of all time "so called lies", Now HOW STUPID do you have to be to not realise its a lie? Look it up, if its bullshit, DONT TEACH IT. I could say, swallowing spit over long periods of time causes cancer, how does that help us cure cancer? ITS NOT TRUE..... I'm starting to wonder if natural selection really does work, we somehow managed to breed ourselves stupider.
MagnusCattus 5 months ago
Amazing how WEAK the arguments from the students are - they had NOTHING! Just goes to show how shaky the ground is under the theory of evolution. It just needs to be given a bit of a push and it will topple. Scientists, however, want to keep their job/funding/position.
jbooks888 6 months ago
Again he does this comparison to non-living things. Similarities in bonestructures supports evolution. But Hovind tries to compare this fact to cars. Cars don't reproduce, how can it be so hard to see?
GoaHead80 6 months ago
@GoaHead80 what he is getting at is similar doesnt mean same. for instance a housecat has 4 legs, an alligator also has 4 legs. all he is saying is that rather than saying they evolved from the same source is that they were designed by the same "designer". in the same sense having triangular wheels for a car wouldnt work too well. what it means is that although they are similar it might just mean god in this case saw it fit that the design of these bonestructures was ideal for the functions.
Falcondick69 5 months ago
@Falcondick69 This shows again that you guys don't understand how evolution works. It's not only the fact that the animals have 4 legs that leads to support evolution. I understand that you are trying to say that cars and skateboards both have wheels and because they were designed, so must animals. However, because they don't reproduce it's a bad comparison. And there are also genetics and other things that you totally ignore.
GoaHead80 5 months ago
@GoaHead80 then explain how it works.
Falcondick69 5 months ago
@Falcondick69 I'm not a scientist, so my own explanation is not as good as a scientist. But here's a link where you can see how different species have homologies of the forelimbs. You should also read about evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles. And think about this: Science is based on testable predictions and explanations, while creation is based on beliefs and absolutely NO research.
GoaHead80 5 months ago
@GoaHead80 so you cant explain or defend your own beliefs? major fail
Falcondick69 5 months ago
@Falcondick69 First of all it's not a belief. Scientists make the observations and predictions. You can't expect everyone who trusts the scientific method and have a basic understanding of science to know every detail in every aspect of science. I can defend my view, but looking at a scientific article will be better if you want a detailed explanation. "Major fail".. How mature.
Now I expect you to refute evolution of mammalian auditory ossicle, if not I assume you can't defend your own belief..
GoaHead80 5 months ago
I forgot to paste the link earlier: wwwdotbritannicadotcom/EBchecked/media/45466/Homologies-of-the-forelimb-among-vertebrates-giving-evidence-for-evolution
GoaHead80 5 months ago
3) 'It's not true that the Embryo has gill slits'. They're actually referred to as Pharyngeal Pouches and they are present in all Vertebrate Embryos. These all form from the same pre-cursor tissue, the Neural Crest.
4) The four limb structures don't prove Evolution they support it. It doesn't really support ID, because this is an Apomorphic characteristic and evidence of a Nested Set. Using human enterprise as the example you can easily see that 'design' generally creates in non-nested sets.
Scienceandorigins 7 months ago
How can you observe a rock producing anything today. Oh yes it has to rain on the rock for millions and millions of years. (Sounds like a galaxy far far away).
MrPieter1978 7 months ago
@fatpeso thats not Hovinds point. His point is that since neither sides can be proved so teach what we can. Not lies. and then let the kids decide.
CloverfieldMonster95 8 months ago
I'm offering 25 grants to anyone who can give me a bullet proof proof of Gods existence.
fatpeso 8 months ago
I understand what hovind is saying, but unless you have faith, what he is saying wont fly.
LuckyIzzy659 10 months ago
State education is about being a consumer, not a critical thinker. Remembering and reciting what is taught as fact is indoctrination, not education. As soon as these students are challenged they turn to logical fallacies, emotional outbursts or irrelevant analogies.
mrgmakin 11 months ago
these are the same little evolutionist shits that go around on youtube and comment things like... ''your i.q is low and DONT UNDERSTAND EVOLUTION!!'' LOL what are we teaching these kids??? seriously there is a big problem here.
hudfadz 1 year ago
@hudfadz Programming, backed by a supposed intellectual superiority. The plain fact is, these evolution believing indivduals automatically discount what they call "creationist science" because they claim it to be biased, whilst believing "evolutionary science" which they automatically believe is true. That is a logical fallacy and a product of indoctrination. When a mind is deprogrammed there is necessarily emotional trauma due to a dramatic paradigm shift.
mrgmakin 11 months ago
wow cannot believe these arguments these kids are presenting.. they are stubborn, they just want to be right even though they are clearly wrong... Put lies in the textbooks because or else there wont be any content... hmmm wonderful argument
heightboosting 1 year ago
Take your hat off, show respect. Stop just attacking Mr. Hovind.
Codenamelumiere 1 year ago
these kids are so brainwashed
BrophyBass 1 year ago 3
@BrophyBass brainwashed??? bahahahahahaha
scottpastry 1 year ago
LOL The satanists working on youtube for the new world order / new age will have a hard time protecting their evolution theory here! How could they even think protecting those students who gets knocked down so easily by Kent Hovind. Its incredible! Those are university students!??
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Yes SOME of these students are out-debated easily by Hovind. He is a practiced debater and these young kids are STUDENTS in their early 20's. You only have to be at college for a day to be a student.
... and SATANISTS?!?!? everyone who believes in evolution is a satanist? Don't you at least have to believe in Satan to be a satanist?
We see light from stars a billion light years away and date trees to over 10,000 years just by counting the rings and he thinks the earth is 6,000 years old!
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d ''everyone who believes in evolution is a satanist?'' Have I ever said that? By the way those students have been powned by Hovind :P Because they have NO arguments! You also have no arguments and by the way I don't believe a word out of your mouth because you put words in my mouth and I do not trust someone who lies to try to prove me wrong :). ''dated trees to over 10,000 years'' With the same fake techniques Hovind explained?? :P
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Have you ever said that? - This is what you said :: "LOL The satanists working on youtube for the new world order / new age will have a hard time protecting their evolution theory here!"
You talk about Satanists and their 'evolution theory'
So yeah, you kinda said that.
As for the students having no argument, I don't know that it falls to 20-year-old college students to defend science that is accepted by 95% of all scientists. Their debate abilities are irrelevant.
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d Wow You are good to twist words out of my mouth! First, All satanists believes in evolution. You want to know why? Because they believe they are evolving to become a God. I said that the satanists who are working on youtube (there is real satanists working on youtube) I haven't said that All evolutionist are satanists! I said All satanists are evolutionists! Do you know what Satanism is all about? Satanists are Humanists. Now do you understand or I have to make a drawing for you???
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414
1> How can satanists believe in evolution if they must inherently believe that God is real?
2> Just because dendrochronology proves trees have a minimum age doesn't imply a maximum age
3> I think if scientists can split the atom and measure light speed, they can count tree rings and interpret the significance
4> first you say that a bunch teenagers can't defend evolution but then the opinions 95% of scientists have no bearing? Opinion of scientific majority is what peer review is about
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d
1> Its clear you don't know anything about satanism... Search about the new age and Luciferianism. Its a good start.
2> LOL find me a tree that is 4.3 billion years :P. This argument dosen't make any sense and proves nothing.
3> Yep this is what YOU think. Dosen't prove evolution anyways
4> First of all you are inventing the ''95%''. This idea is in your mind. There is more people than you think that believes in creation. Even scientists. Majority dosen't mean truth.
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414
1> I'll grant you I don't know much about satanism; I think I can safely say it's one of the rarest religions though and even more illogical than Christianity. Not worthy of research, and if they believe in Satan but still evolution, they are fools.
2> It proves that the earth is older than 6000 years, OTHER evidence proves 4.5 billion. Counting tree rings is hard to argue with though is the point.
3> see above
4> "95% of scientists" stat is cold hard fact, verifiable anywhere.
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d Well If you knew about Satanism and its influence in our society and especially in our governments and in secret societies (skull and bones is just one example) and its agenda, you would understand why evolution is a key in bringing about this new world order/ new age. All your arguments do not prove anything about evolution. I would suggest you to question your position on this subject. Your argument about the scientists simply prove even more to me that the conspiracy. Search plzz.
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 I think he needs a few drawings.
Codenamelumiere 1 year ago
@Codenamelumiere Indeed he does.... Tu parles français j'imagine?
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Je voudrais pouvoir parler français, mais malheureusement j'ai pris le nom d'un anime. Désolé. Google traduction pour la victoire.
Codenamelumiere 1 year ago
@Codenamelumiere :) my mistake! God bless you!
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Haha no problem, you as well.
Codenamelumiere 1 year ago
Saying that 95 % of scientists believe the same thing is so fallacious! By the way Evolution is not a science. Evolution only takes place in your mind! Believing you came from a Rock (This is what you should believe if you believe in evolution) is science??! by the way Hitler said this :
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”
If you want more information about the new world order, private message me.
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Look into dendrochronology. I just said that SIMPLY BY COUNTING TREE RINGS we can know the trees are over 10,000 years old.
Carbon dating confirms the same ages.
Hovind is a deceiver, using arguments he knows have been refuted. Scientists know for instance that shellfish and bottom feeders do not date accurately with carbon dating. The technique is not used there. Ocean dwellers in general date less accurately. Such is not the case with woolly mammoths, ancient humans and trees.
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d dendrochronology... First of all its possible to have more than 1 ring per year. Especially if the tree is really old. Second Does that prove evolution???!! Wait lets compare. Kent Hovind say the earth is 6000 years old. You say 4.3 billions years old... I think your argument is FOR the creationists! Thank you! By the way Carbon dating is unreliable plzz do not use this argument with me... You have NO arguments for evolution. Your fairy tale story of evolution is still dumb...
axe414 1 year ago
Dr Hovind made these Berkeley students look dumb. If he can explain his point in plain english and make it look simple how come evolutionist can't. They tend to explain their theories with long winded explanations whereas Dr Hovind can make me understand it in under an hour.
fobbyo 1 year ago
Kent Hovind taught science in a high school that HE STARTED. He has no real credentials. He is in jail for fraud.
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d He is in jail because he exposed the New world order depopulation agenda. The IRS is the fraud. The whole economic system is the fraud. Rothchild, Rockefeller etc... You are a liar and probably working for the new world order. Plzz repent of your sin and come to Jesus...
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Out of his own mouth you hear him talk about his resentment of taxes and what they're used for many many times. He hasn't exposed anything but his own ignorance. Which Rothchild / Rockefeller are you talking about?
Have you ever considered how you sound from the point of view of someone accused of "working for the New World Order" who obviously knows that they don't work for any such thing?
He is in jail for not only not paying his taxes but lying to get out of paying them.
swilson3d 1 year ago
@swilson3d LOLL you say he lied about paying them. Have you ever maybe considered that maybe just maybe the IRS framed him??? By the way I retire my argument about the Doctor Hilpman. I don't think he works for the New world order. He was not good enough :P.
axe414 1 year ago
@axe414 Have you ever considered that people whose job it is to make sure people pay their taxes are more tipped off by his statements about tax resentment than they are about some depopulation conspiracy? How would a major depopulation happen and why? Why would the IRS be in on it?
Doesn't it make more sense that he simply committed a crime? People do that.
Was Ted Haggard a victim of the same conspiracy?
What color is the sky in your world?
swilson3d 1 year ago
wow. the educational system has brain washed these people into defending the lies in texts books, even when hovind pointed it our for them.
that ladies and gentlemen is called close minded.
Gods0n1 1 year ago
that asian kid is retarded, he should be embarassed
elrugged1 1 year ago
PRAISE JESUS FOREVER AND EVER AND EVER AND EVER!
ginjaninja1988 1 year ago
From sickeness cured to deformities fixed to injuries healed..... I HAVE SEEN AND PERFORMED THE SAME GOD GLORIFYING WORKS THAT JESUS PERFORMED. We are dealing with a massive massive massive God who is beyond our wildest dreams and comprehension. He is life and sustains all life and created all life and anyone who misses out on knowing him misses out on the real truth. CHRISTIANS WAKE UP! THERE IS SO MUCH MORE TO YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS; OTHERS WAKE UP! THERE IS A GOD WHO CARES 4 AND LOVES U
ginjaninja1988 1 year ago
Personally I don't need the evidence to refute evolution because I know beyond all doubt that any evidence that does not stack up against the Gospel is therefore false. The only truth you will find is in the Gospel. How do I know? Because I have an active relationship with the only TRUE GOD and CREATOR. It is a tangible, real, physical, spiritual relationship. I feel his presence, have seen his presence, heard his voice, seen incredible miricles with my own eyes and continue to see them
ginjaninja1988 1 year ago
@ginjaninja1988 Praise God forever.... once you had that experience it really does not matter what people say.. all we can do is shine our light a be the salt of the earth.. Praise God and great comment
photocrop7 1 year ago 2
Honestly some of these so called scientists of the future are real thick....... Just listening to their comments and arguements makes me laugh. They shoot themselves in the foot over and over again. I mean come on...... Not removing the lies from text books results in the betterment of education?? Honestly?? This is spiritual blindness, when folly and reason are thrown to the side and forgotten for the passion of a lost cause all so one may think he is not responsible to a God who will judge one
ginjaninja1988 1 year ago
If you've never listened to a counter argument on this subject, then you have no right to say what is right and what isn't right. Listen to someone who has studied in this field, and you'll find that they make more sense than this guy. All of his facts can be proven wrong, and it's a shame that people are really believing what he's saying. Stop looking at arguments that agree with you, and look for ones that don't. Watch it with an open mind, and you never know, you might see some sense in them.
heyrayadele 1 year ago
Einstein's theory wasn't popular opinion. It's always been the people going against the grain who make the break threws.
calebstone22 1 year ago
I love how Hovind pretends to be so much smarter than these people who are so much more equipped to answer questions about biology than him, and then he lands in the slammer for being a thief and a liar, yes he is indeed a GOOD CHRISTIAN MAN. Ramen my brothers
gonzolotik 1 year ago
These kids are SO rude and immature. They all talk the same and act the same and its shameful that they're growing up being disrespectful.
LuckyIzzy659 1 year ago 24
@LuckyIzzy659 - The sad truth is that no one is dumber than college kids. This video is perfect proof.
GlorifiedTruth 1 year ago
@GlorifiedTruth Its sad that my generation is full of a bunch of dumbasses.
Im 16 btw.
LuckyIzzy659 1 year ago
@LuckyIzzy659 - LOL, don't feel bad. Every generation is.
GlorifiedTruth 1 year ago
@LuckyIzzy659 Yeah how dare they question the established scientific fact of evolution that the overwhelming majority of the smartest people in the world agree on...yeah...dumb kids...
SSGWhit 10 months ago
@SSGWhit Uhm you can question something without acting like a jerk. And these kids should realize that.
LuckyIzzy659 10 months ago
@LuckyIzzy659 Oh...lets shine some much needed perspective on the situation. If this guy believed that the earth was 6000 years old....then I along with yourself would also act as arrogant in my questing. BUT...you just might believe that lunacy. So lets say he was saying the earth is flat. There is almost as much evidence for the spherical shape of the earth as there is for evolution by natural selection. Just as there is for a whole slew of other accepted scientific facts. Like gravity.
SSGWhit 10 months ago
@SSGWhit Does that still give them the right to act rude? Had they acted nicer they maybe would have gotten farther.
LuckyIzzy659 10 months ago
@SSGWhit So you're saying evolution is a fact? Comparing it to gravity would make it a law. Did you even watch the video? I'm going to quote Honvind and say give me some evidence for evolution. That makes it a theory at the least. And a theory in science has to be thrown out if there's no evidence for it.
RueMyView 10 months ago
@RueMyView That deserves an Applause
ryourhm 8 months ago
@SSGWhit Reputed creationist scientists proves time and time again that evolution is debunked. The Bible proved that the earth is round, scientists discovered it only a couple of centuries ago. Who was right first, the Bible or scientists?
MrPieter1978 7 months ago
@MrPieter1978 Proved? Proof in demonstrable or quantitative not insertion. When you say "Creationist Science"....give me one peer reviewed creationist paper that "debunks" evolution. Just one. Also your bible fallacy is not just false but concedes that you know very little of the bible....or arguments. So yeah...just post the link to one peer reviewed paper debunking Evolution....Right here.
SSGWhit 7 months ago
@MrPieter1978 What proof have creationist offered? And how did the bible PROVE the earth was flat? Didn't the bible say the earth has four corners, indicating that the earth if flat and squareshaped? Perhaps you're one of the christian fanatics who's never read the bible.
GoaHead80 6 months ago
@GoaHead80 I can see you dont understand the bible at all. Hovind was talking about origins and cells!
5tonyvvvv 5 months ago
@GoaHead80 Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 5 months ago
@LuckyIzzy659 Hovind is the disrespectful one. he has his beliefs and do we, but he is calling our beliefs a lie. everyone has their own viewpoints and he needs to leave it that way. I hear hovind and he's being a dick to everyone
OverdoseIndustries 8 months ago
@OverdoseIndustries But they think his beliefs are a lie too. Atheists hate christianity just as much as christians hate atheism.
I on the other hand, no matter what I believed, would not hate the other. Because without one, the other is not challenged.
LuckyIzzy659 8 months ago
evolutionists are clearly in denial, to believe otherwise is absolute stupidity
trackguy2 1 year ago
1:20 Did the kid in the white shirt say: there'd be a sh#t load of good biology!
RudySpino 1 year ago
Holy crap this kid is dumb.
NTMCG 1 year ago
What religion are you speaking of, the religion of science and reason? If you must know I was raised a baptist, fortunately I came quickly to my senses. Ironically I was reading the bible that set the ball rolling toward agnosticism, which inevitably turned to atheism.
Did your parents farce Yah on you or something?
PS: this Yah you speak of must really be a pussy if he needs your sissy ass to defend him.
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp He doesn't need me to defend Him. He needs me to introduce His Word to you, so that I can be the vessel through which He can come into your life.
dougmoerhoffman 1 year ago
lol Your funny I'v got to give you that, but your still wrong.
LIKE WHAT? you ask, well genetics for one. Genetics confirmed the theory of common descent, that is that all living things share common ancestors.
As for evolving from apes, I'v got news for you we (you included) have never stopped being apes.
Of cores we don't live in the bronze age, stupid. But that book you mentioned before, yeah that one. The book you get your "science" from, its a bronze age relic.
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
Way to refute stuff I never even mentioned.
Like I said before its fucking stupid of you to assert something is true b/c 95% think that way. That simply means 95% of people still hold on to silly bronze age beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I also don't give a rat's ass what the bible says, I was simply saying just b/c the majority of people once believed the earth was flat did not make it so.
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp A large amount of people believe in evolution, this doesn't make it right. They're holding on to pre-Atomic Age beliefs. I don't give a rat's ass what evolution says.
Also, the "flat earth" MYTH was invented in the last 1800s.
dougmoerhoffman 1 year ago
Yeah I think you'd find that those who "believe" in evolution generally are smart people. I would also say its F**KING STUPID of you to assert something is true or false based on how many followers it has.
Remember how the majority of people use to "believe" the world was flat? Of course that did not make it true, Did it?
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
Yeah, I'm serious.
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
Only Nerds Believe in Evolution!!!!!
vipsamsam 2 years ago 20
naw only smart people do
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'.Chirality
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!!!. Which is toxic to life!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do is copy information,thats not creating anything! Intelligence created life!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
5:25. Cute how Hovind gets caught in his own lie.
Stitchman3875 2 years ago
yellow guy is stupid MAN!
narupiece 2 years ago
Lmao lolol!
ThePerrynator 2 years ago
the boy with the hat is a complete idiot. "limiting knowlege" your a dumb idotic fool. MAN lol.
narupiece 2 years ago
who's the guy in the suit with hovind, some drone from hyles anderson?
agnostaxian 2 years ago