Nobody is suggesting a system without any organistion.The idea is a democratic system organised from the bottom up rather then the top down ie that the power is not concentrated in the hands of a few powerful people but in the hands of people like you and I who can act for their own interests. It's that simple, and it's very hard to disagree with. Anarchy is not a belief in chaos. Nobody wants Chaos. The word has a lot of negative connotations. Blame the sex pistols.Try democratic socialism
what makes you think anarchists are all young, in fact the most noted anarchists where anything but young. Did you know that thomas jefferson had anarchistic ideals? not to be rude but know your facts before you start an argument, i dont bother with moronic debates.
I didn't say that they are all young, I said feel young.
Anarchists know that their "anarchy" is never actually going to happen, so they feel safe in purporting their absurd views.
Look at the London protests - the anarchists, those idiots running around with black hoods and scarfs around their faces, trying to look cool and look tough, when in fact they were just a bunch of bored people who were trying to look rebellious and "different"
Its called black bloc, the hoods and mask keep them from being reconized, only an idiot would put himself in jail and think he can make a difference. There are more reasons then what you think all you have to do is stop observing for a moment and investigate.
So they go to a protest and anticipate being arrested? What are they planning to do there, cause violence? Putting on the ridiculous mask and hoody makes you MORE of a target to the police, you silly person!
And lets be clear about why they like to wear them - it makes them feel really rebellious, they think they look really tough and "different"
"oh look, im against the system!"
Those idiots in hoods at the London protests were a total embarassment.
Childish is wanting someone "smarter" than you to make your decisions for you. The people in power aren't smarter than anyone of course, they score average to poorly when tested academically with the rest of society. But they are smarter than you because they make decisions and you don't. The entire concept of the "system" is based on the assumption that people are too stupid to think for themselves. So they must be told what to do by... other people :) That's nationalism for you fucktard.
So you are suggesting a system without any sort of organisation.
So when you have a football team, there is no need for a manager to organise the team?
When somebody sets up a company and employs people, that person should have no authority in the way the company is run?
Thankfully, complete fucktards like you are irrelevant in this country, and are normally found with a beer can and black headscarf trying to look cool.
I know you are so desperate to look "different" and its so sad.
irm I know alot of people who are too dumb to think for themselves these people have thrived since the rules on borrowing money have been relaxed which was based on the idea people can think for themselves this subprime mortgage and loan crisis tells us otherwise.
he cleared that in front of the American senate (you can find this on youtube) he actually turned the tables around on them!! they couldent get any prof accept a story from a newspaper!
and if you want to choose peace for a solution then you should start by showing to people that you can act differently and more fair than the other polititians instead of taking people away from your speach.
Anarchy is not without order, it is order by the people, not the few elite.
RaWBLooD 2 years ago 4
Nobody is suggesting a system without any organistion.The idea is a democratic system organised from the bottom up rather then the top down ie that the power is not concentrated in the hands of a few powerful people but in the hands of people like you and I who can act for their own interests. It's that simple, and it's very hard to disagree with. Anarchy is not a belief in chaos. Nobody wants Chaos. The word has a lot of negative connotations. Blame the sex pistols.Try democratic socialism
danzo240 2 years ago 3
God, I hate anarchists. They don't understand the purpose of a government and constitution.
Cheshirecat55 2 years ago
They are simply attention seekers, that are desperate to look different, and rebellious.
It's so very very sad.
yington 2 years ago
We understand it only too well which is why we oppose it.
DoJaenin 2 years ago
George Galloway seeks to produce a state that is anything but Anarchy.
yington 2 years ago
Oh look im an anarchist, i want to be cool and look really rebellious. and want to feel young forever
yington 2 years ago
what makes you think anarchists are all young, in fact the most noted anarchists where anything but young. Did you know that thomas jefferson had anarchistic ideals? not to be rude but know your facts before you start an argument, i dont bother with moronic debates.
AnarchistCommunity 2 years ago
I didn't say that they are all young, I said feel young.
Anarchists know that their "anarchy" is never actually going to happen, so they feel safe in purporting their absurd views.
Look at the London protests - the anarchists, those idiots running around with black hoods and scarfs around their faces, trying to look cool and look tough, when in fact they were just a bunch of bored people who were trying to look rebellious and "different"
"oh look, im against the system"
childish.
yington 2 years ago
Its called black bloc, the hoods and mask keep them from being reconized, only an idiot would put himself in jail and think he can make a difference. There are more reasons then what you think all you have to do is stop observing for a moment and investigate.
AnarchistCommunity 2 years ago
So they go to a protest and anticipate being arrested? What are they planning to do there, cause violence? Putting on the ridiculous mask and hoody makes you MORE of a target to the police, you silly person!
And lets be clear about why they like to wear them - it makes them feel really rebellious, they think they look really tough and "different"
"oh look, im against the system!"
Those idiots in hoods at the London protests were a total embarassment.
Please, grow up.
yington 2 years ago
Childish is wanting someone "smarter" than you to make your decisions for you. The people in power aren't smarter than anyone of course, they score average to poorly when tested academically with the rest of society. But they are smarter than you because they make decisions and you don't. The entire concept of the "system" is based on the assumption that people are too stupid to think for themselves. So they must be told what to do by... other people :) That's nationalism for you fucktard.
Ril74 2 years ago
So you are suggesting a system without any sort of organisation.
So when you have a football team, there is no need for a manager to organise the team?
When somebody sets up a company and employs people, that person should have no authority in the way the company is run?
Thankfully, complete fucktards like you are irrelevant in this country, and are normally found with a beer can and black headscarf trying to look cool.
I know you are so desperate to look "different" and its so sad.
yington 2 years ago
irm I know alot of people who are too dumb to think for themselves these people have thrived since the rules on borrowing money have been relaxed which was based on the idea people can think for themselves this subprime mortgage and loan crisis tells us otherwise.
I prefer nationalism over anarchy anyday.
anthonyo4 2 years ago
he cleared that in front of the American senate (you can find this on youtube) he actually turned the tables around on them!! they couldent get any prof accept a story from a newspaper!
DSSNTC 3 years ago
Honestly how can you know what an anarchist looks like? It looks like one lonely drunk kid who heckles for a laugh.
TIP: if you want to heckle proper, make sure you have more suppoters then they have stewards
spokrocks 3 years ago
i was one of the people who had to show this mad man the door. he was completely out of control.
he had no reason for wanting to storm the stage. he just wanted to be a nuisence
jaystewart1975 3 years ago
He was completely out of control? That sounds a bit suspicious to me....whose control, yours?
Maybe he doesn't want you to control him eh?
What about you try to control yourself in future and keep your hands to yourself too...or maybe we should control you.
wilsparky 3 years ago
I'm in this video at 0:36 woop woop!
brett18uk 3 years ago
and if you want to choose peace for a solution then you should start by showing to people that you can act differently and more fair than the other polititians instead of taking people away from your speach.
santazilia 3 years ago