yet now without nukes iran is the biggest danger, feeding several international antisemite and terror powers, - also in Germany. With the steady danger of iran nukes, ISRAEL and (other) friends of freedom constantly will be threatened by nuke backed islam terrorism. So, if RUSSIA (and GERMANY) will feed IRAN with strategical hardware further on, a WAR WILL be enevitable ! see about develope of NAZI-ISLAMism w.STOPtheBomb , w.photospalestine.free.f, w.tellTheChildrenTheTruth.co
Nuclear weapons really put this little guy into perspective. Watch Shot Grable of Operation Upshot-Knothole at the Nevada test site. The shell yeild was 15KT(2000 BLU-82) which is also weak in terms of mondern nuclear weapons but still enough to destroy any moderately sized city and most of its inhabitants. For those interested in the effects of an even bigger explosion watch Nuclear War: A Guide To Armaggedon. This documentary simulates the effects of a 1MT(66 Grables) air burst over Britian.
@collinr77 I would say the dead us troops, the crippled for life troops, the 100's of thousands of dead Iraqi civilians when Saddam and his men could have been taken out with 1 patriot missile = FAIL. Now tell me how Vietnam was a success too LOL
@mookixox Saddam and his men with 1 missile huh? Interesting. You should have told our government that you knew when Saddam and thousands of his Baathists were all together. And I guess that patriot missile would solve the insurgency and nation building after as well? Vietnam was a complete failure, only due to our ridiculous government leaders and strategists
@collinr77 So you're saying what is good for Ghadaffi and his regime was no good for Saddam? Oh that's right I forgot the rebels fighting Ghaddaffi also include Alqaeda linked muslim fighters. Well gee I sure feel safer giving more guns, explosives, funding and political power to Alqaeda in Libya...(sarc).
@mookixox Last I checked Ghadafi is still on the loose and Saddam is dead. Also, Iraq is a democracy and Libya has no real government. The Libyan conflict has just started and unfortunately the worst is yet to come. Boots on the ground will always work best.
@collinr77 The last I checked Ghadaffi isn't in control, has no tanks, choppers or other war vessels to be utilizesd against the US and the tax payers haven't flushed trillions down the drain NOR 1000's of young troops packed into tin caskets (That's good enough for me).
@mookixox Simply because of the rebel fighters aka boots on the ground, funded by NATO. Missiles only go so far. And like I said the worst is yet to come in Libya
@collinr77 Yeah missiles wiped out Ghadaffi's military capabilities to attack the US with jets and everything in between, sounds pretty good to me. Of course the worst yet is to come out of Libya, Nato is equipping, funding and backing muslims that are Alqaeda linked fighters shouting "ALLAH AHKBAR"! All over again. Gee how could this possibly backfire? (I know how, send Nato troops to install "democracy" in Libya for the next 8 years or so). that's how.
@mookixox lol youre retarded man. I just got done saying the worst is yet to come, and now you argue with me about how the worst is yet to come. im confused
@mookixox lol my bad man i forgot an apostrophe. im still confused about what you are even arguing for but congratulations on serving my ass for everyone to see. lol you are awesome bro!
Considering we have the Nuclear power to turn all of Asia into a parking lot... I think using this on TERRORISTS (You know, the suicide bombers/IED/ Hit and run pussies?) is fair.
@stonedogtx Hey good idea! Instead of actually acting, you can just think about it and post it up on youtube where thousands of people will read and ignore.
Knowing the Americans are using these in the middle east against people who live (hide) in caves (think about it) using types of weapons from 30 years back against million dollar bombs.... the imbalance is just wrong.
it was a long ways away. Remember, the visible explosion itself doesn`t account for nearly as much damage and death as the blast does. A big cloud of dust and smoke a few meters wide is one thing, but the damage can bee seen much further away. This thing has a successful history, don`t judge it because it looks small
It doesnt cut the shape of a daisy. They called it the daisy cutter because the shockwave would clear (cut) everything for miles around. They used it in Vietnamese forests to clear out landing zones for helicopters.
Every country has its extremists. Go to Alabama and wear a billboard saying 'I support Obama's gun laws and racial equality/communism' and see how long it takes you to get shot.
Whoever said fail is an idiot, the bomb is not supposed to erupt in flames it is used to clear land for a landing zone so it uses a large shock wave to obliterate anything in it's range. If it was a big fireball your landing zone would be on fire and we all know that would be bad because their is no point in trying to load or unload troops or supplies in flame lol.
You forget that we are talking to modern youth. Half these dipshits can't back their car up and the other half can't pull their pants up. You think they know a thing about common sence?
am i the only one who thought the explosion was pretty pathetics? No fireball, just dust. And it wasn't even that big a blast...and i know its far away!
Well ya it is far away and these bombs were used in Vietnam to clear the trees for a landing zone, so it doesn't need a fireball it uses it's huge shock wave that you can clearly see to blast the trees to pieces. If it had a fireball the landing zone would be a pile of flames so why would you want a landing zone that is on fire, not smart.
what do you mean fail, just take a look at how small the bomb looks, comparing to the earlier images, the bomb is obviously very far away you dumbfucks
It's massive, can clear a square mile wide helicopter pad, they were used in Vietnam. Now we have slightly more powerful conventional bombs like the MOAB...and I think that's it for now. The BLU-82 has been the largest non nuclear bomb in the US inventory from Vietnam till up to a year or so ago.
it cannot clear a mile - the blast is 100/300 meters at most (which is pretty damn big) with obviously flying debis and metal raining down much further. a mile is 1600 meters....unlikely.
you don't know shit about perspective. do you? Did you stop to think that you can't even see the bomb because the camera is so far away. All you can see is the parachute. Therefore it's a BIG blast
just look at it, the explosion is probably a maximum of 10 feet across and 5 feet high - even if the camera were a fair distance away, a couple hundred yards or so. It's an extremely weak explosion I think.
well I guess not if they want to keep letting the terrorists get away to fight another day. If I was in charge of equipment procurement, 3000 American soldiers lives would have been saved.
you better believe it! It's purely a matter of power vs. weakness. They've thought they could save money by buying weak bombs but now look at the downturn, I bet those savings have been completely wiped out.
Gates, the secretary now, he is missing a brain! He killed thousands of Americans that could easily still be alive.
lmao. unbelievable is right, you have no sense of perception. this IS the blu-82 daisy cuter, would a bomb with just a few feet in diameter blast radius put out THAT big of a shock wave? you can see it clearly after it explodes. and i would say your little translation more apply's to you, rather than me.
well it's not my fault that I can't empathize with bombs and other people, my guess is that a hand grenade explosion is 438 times larger than this bomb's.
If you were in charge of equipment procurement, acehimself, now U.S. would be filling rifle magazines with hand grenades and dropping tin cans on the terrorists...If you have ABSOLUTELY no idea what you're talkin' about, then do everybody the favor of a lifetime and keep your hole shut...
did anyone else spend most of their afternoon trying to figure out who's side they're on in this mooki-collin debate?
MrBdubbs21 1 month ago
Can I order one to be Shipped by Air to Iran, with Detonation on Arrival?
3martijns 1 month ago
yet now without nukes iran is the biggest danger, feeding several international antisemite and terror powers, - also in Germany. With the steady danger of iran nukes, ISRAEL and (other) friends of freedom constantly will be threatened by nuke backed islam terrorism. So, if RUSSIA (and GERMANY) will feed IRAN with strategical hardware further on, a WAR WILL be enevitable ! see about develope of NAZI-ISLAMism w.STOPtheBomb , w.photospalestine.free.f, w.tellTheChildrenTheTruth.co
Kreatorix 3 months ago
I think they were also known as "LZ in a can"
fk4515 3 months ago
Nuclear weapons really put this little guy into perspective. Watch Shot Grable of Operation Upshot-Knothole at the Nevada test site. The shell yeild was 15KT(2000 BLU-82) which is also weak in terms of mondern nuclear weapons but still enough to destroy any moderately sized city and most of its inhabitants. For those interested in the effects of an even bigger explosion watch Nuclear War: A Guide To Armaggedon. This documentary simulates the effects of a 1MT(66 Grables) air burst over Britian.
BONOBO39 7 months ago
is that it? lol....
MsThomasRC 9 months ago 3
This bomb has more American Fail then the Iraq war LOL.
mookixox 10 months ago
@mookixox Since when is 15,000 lbs of HE fail?
TheMohawkNinja 8 months ago
@mookixox we already won the war in iraq. bush's troop surge worked. there is peace now in iraq. you low IQ crackhead.
judgerofwars 6 months ago
@judgerofwars Peaceful....minus the suicide bombings. :| fail.
tlucentefl 6 months ago
@mookixox Lol Iraq has a democracy now dumbass. Im curious of your definition of fail.
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 I would say the dead us troops, the crippled for life troops, the 100's of thousands of dead Iraqi civilians when Saddam and his men could have been taken out with 1 patriot missile = FAIL. Now tell me how Vietnam was a success too LOL
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox Saddam and his men with 1 missile huh? Interesting. You should have told our government that you knew when Saddam and thousands of his Baathists were all together. And I guess that patriot missile would solve the insurgency and nation building after as well? Vietnam was a complete failure, only due to our ridiculous government leaders and strategists
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 So you're saying what is good for Ghadaffi and his regime was no good for Saddam? Oh that's right I forgot the rebels fighting Ghaddaffi also include Alqaeda linked muslim fighters. Well gee I sure feel safer giving more guns, explosives, funding and political power to Alqaeda in Libya...(sarc).
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox Last I checked Ghadafi is still on the loose and Saddam is dead. Also, Iraq is a democracy and Libya has no real government. The Libyan conflict has just started and unfortunately the worst is yet to come. Boots on the ground will always work best.
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 The last I checked Ghadaffi isn't in control, has no tanks, choppers or other war vessels to be utilizesd against the US and the tax payers haven't flushed trillions down the drain NOR 1000's of young troops packed into tin caskets (That's good enough for me).
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox Simply because of the rebel fighters aka boots on the ground, funded by NATO. Missiles only go so far. And like I said the worst is yet to come in Libya
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 Yeah missiles wiped out Ghadaffi's military capabilities to attack the US with jets and everything in between, sounds pretty good to me. Of course the worst yet is to come out of Libya, Nato is equipping, funding and backing muslims that are Alqaeda linked fighters shouting "ALLAH AHKBAR"! All over again. Gee how could this possibly backfire? (I know how, send Nato troops to install "democracy" in Libya for the next 8 years or so). that's how.
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox lol youre retarded man. I just got done saying the worst is yet to come, and now you argue with me about how the worst is yet to come. im confused
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 I just finished serving your ass for the past week for everyone to see (and it's typed "you're" not "your") fuckwitt. LOL
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox lol my bad man i forgot an apostrophe. im still confused about what you are even arguing for but congratulations on serving my ass for everyone to see. lol you are awesome bro!
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 And don't forget it...
mookixox 5 months ago
@mookixox lol you are weird as fuck
collinr77 5 months ago
@mookixox lol fuckin weirdo
collinr77 5 months ago
@collinr77 Just a guess, you haven't been in laid in quite some time? lol
mookixox 4 months ago
8 people were under the bomb
pacopecas2 11 months ago
@pacopecas2 no... just no
Mastadon316 8 months ago
Comment removed
pacopecas2 11 months ago
Yeaaaah SKADOOSH!
ReadmanJ 1 year ago
Outbreak anyone?
JetJockey87 1 year ago
No way that thing is packed with 15k lbs of explosives. More like a test run with 150 lbs! Uber small blast
jeffsmonte 1 year ago
@jeffsmonte u r stupid.
augdog1230 1 year ago
A problem caused by a bomb can be solved by a Bomb...
doodskie999 1 year ago
.....INCORRECTLY REFERRED TO AS "DAISY CUTTER", a term which more properly applies to the fuze assembly for above-ground bursts.
In Vietnam it was used to clear helicopter landing zones about 250 feet in diameter. ALSO CALLED THE DAISY CUTTER, ......
These contradictory statements one paragraph away from each other confuse me a litte.
xzenothx 1 year ago 3
@xzenothx im thinkin more like a 600 yd diameter
Spankydaham924 1 year ago
O.k. I did not see any daisies being cut here ? Why not use a lawn mower, or weed-whacker...come on help me out here ?
mysteryman605 1 year ago 3
An explosion can be described as the sudden going away of things from where they were before.
marmaloon 1 year ago 20
@marmaloon i think this is the best damn comment ive seen on any explosion vids
LordReaper117 1 year ago 6
I think also was used during the first Iraq War, the Brits thought we used a tac nuke.
magcharles1 1 year ago
I could use one of those on my inlaws!
asas2jh 1 year ago
You know what would suck?
Being in the blast radius of one of these.
leopard2a6mcan 1 year ago
@leopard2a6mcan It would suck more if you were in the blast radius of my butthole.
FalloutRadius 1 year ago
what is this bomb designed to do?? it looks massive but the effects weren't as big as i thought....
Pitty098 1 year ago
it was meant to clear large portions of jungle in vietnam to create landing zones for helicopters. dead VC were just an added bonus.
kylosius 1 year ago
@Pitty098 the explosion because of its blast sucks all the oxygen out of the radius. Killing anything.
saskid100 1 year ago
Emm marWichmann,
Considering we have the Nuclear power to turn all of Asia into a parking lot... I think using this on TERRORISTS (You know, the suicide bombers/IED/ Hit and run pussies?) is fair.
pmzqabel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some of these would look really good dropping right on top of a bunch of American heads.
stonedogtx 2 years ago
@stonedogtx Hey good idea! Instead of actually acting, you can just think about it and post it up on youtube where thousands of people will read and ignore.
ubcs109 2 years ago
@stonedogtx
Do you feel like you are doing something by boring us to tears with your spam?
As if you aren't boring enough already.
flanksteak2 2 years ago
@stonedogtx
Or just on nobodies head (no I'm not a hippy).
Knowing the Americans are using these in the middle east against people who live (hide) in caves (think about it) using types of weapons from 30 years back against million dollar bombs.... the imbalance is just wrong.
markWiechmann 2 years ago
The faster this is over the better, so the bigger the imbalance the better.
p4inmaker 2 years ago
@p4inmaker
Untill someone tougher than you are stands at your front door off course. ;-)
markWiechmann 2 years ago
Doesnt matter, if all that shit just ends, does it?
p4inmaker 2 years ago
Perhaps the US should resort to their tactics? Strap bombs on childeren and send them in?
Muhammedloveskids 2 years ago 2
I heard they were able to drop pairs of these for a 30K bomb strike.
john91722 2 years ago
apparently they used several of these in afghanistan in 2002 on taliban mountain bases in some kind of shock and awe campaign
101andrewj 2 years ago
i heard they use to clear out mexicans from toco stands and other places the mexis hang out in.
THECoatHanger1 2 years ago
Yep
Kevin32001 2 years ago
MOAB
Dawk2202 2 years ago
MOAB
Dawk2202 2 years ago
it was a long ways away. Remember, the visible explosion itself doesn`t account for nearly as much damage and death as the blast does. A big cloud of dust and smoke a few meters wide is one thing, but the damage can bee seen much further away. This thing has a successful history, don`t judge it because it looks small
scallywag86 2 years ago
@scallywag86 ye its a next gen clean bomb lol i dont get how it cuts the shape of a daisy???
djdan151 2 years ago
it doesn`t. The term Daisy Cutter comes from it`s ability to lay flat, even the smallest of flower
scallywag86 2 years ago
@scallywag86 lol cheers dude
djdan151 2 years ago
@djdan151
It doesnt cut the shape of a daisy. They called it the daisy cutter because the shockwave would clear (cut) everything for miles around. They used it in Vietnamese forests to clear out landing zones for helicopters.
TheNp42 2 years ago
goose terd thats good
crobo1975 2 years ago
i think the should drop about 40 of these fuckers on baghdad.
cnknguyen 2 years ago
Why?
Tedinator01 2 years ago
any human problem can be solved with the correct amount of high explosive...
cnknguyen 2 years ago 81
@cnknguyen Thinking like a terrorist. I like it.
KitamusPrime 1 year ago
@cnknguyen and duct tape
Ascendsct 10 months ago
@cnknguyen Spoken like a yank.
m1leswilliams 10 months ago
@cnknguyen
Yeah!!!! Murder them all!! Sure glad gods on our side
tfustudios 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cnknguyen thats worht quoting on my channel :D
9911MU51C 5 months ago
Yeah! That'll teach those civilians to be civilians!
Fucking moron.
aaronz101 2 years ago
@aaronz101 fuck you cunt, go over there then start talking shit.
cnknguyen 2 years ago
I spent 3 years there for social studies you clueless fuckwit.
aaronz101 2 years ago
@aaronz101 its too bad you werent killed.
cnknguyen 2 years ago
You're a fantastic person. God forbid some asshole question your ignorant racism.
I'm sure if your parents gave a shit about their failure of a 12-year-old son, they would be proud.
After the rape, of course.
aaronz101 2 years ago
@aaronz101 go back over there and wear a billboard that says your an understanding American, so the "civilians" know whos head they are cutting off.
cnknguyen 2 years ago
Every country has its extremists. Go to Alabama and wear a billboard saying 'I support Obama's gun laws and racial equality/communism' and see how long it takes you to get shot.
aaronz101 2 years ago 3
No one would get shot. You ignorance is truly amazing.
4waynosespray 2 years ago
@aaronz101
Hahahahahahhahaahha, classic my friend. I wouldn't say you would get shot, I would say you would be plowed down by a mobile home.
TheNp42 2 years ago
I stand corrected.
aaronz101 2 years ago
Add an extre 0 on that m8 make it 400
adamp2k 2 years ago
I love how Nguyen gets all pissed off, while aaronz schools him. It's great to watch. I wish you two would keep going.
levitd 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
FreedomForge 2 years ago
Whoever said fail is an idiot, the bomb is not supposed to erupt in flames it is used to clear land for a landing zone so it uses a large shock wave to obliterate anything in it's range. If it was a big fireball your landing zone would be on fire and we all know that would be bad because their is no point in trying to load or unload troops or supplies in flame lol.
grim967 2 years ago
I knew it had strong reverbrence, I for one like this weapon. Very devastating in it's own way I'd say.
ChazZeromus 2 years ago
during vietnam war, they aren't allowed to use it anymore...
TheHiddenOne347 2 years ago
they used a daisy cutter in afghanistan 2 destroy a underground mountain bunker... as it is very powerful but still 20x less expensive then the moab
TheGatman101 2 years ago
You forget that we are talking to modern youth. Half these dipshits can't back their car up and the other half can't pull their pants up. You think they know a thing about common sence?
ICBSF 2 years ago 2
onnajiuba, bombs DON'T make fireballs, like int the movies, go act like you know what your talking about somewhere else.
funnymuphinfilms 2 years ago
Correct, hollywood films would use a small charge with a lot of bags filled with gasoline to make the explosion more dramatic.
benner2000 2 years ago
my dad works with these bombs and how to improve them. He just got back from a daisy cutter test.
violinartist1 2 years ago
am i the only one who thought the explosion was pretty pathetics? No fireball, just dust. And it wasn't even that big a blast...and i know its far away!
onnajiuba 2 years ago
You should play it slower and watch the shockwave emitted from the explosion.
They tested a bomb like this before in America, and miles away in a roadside town people reported windows cracking.
nst6ldr 2 years ago
Well ya it is far away and these bombs were used in Vietnam to clear the trees for a landing zone, so it doesn't need a fireball it uses it's huge shock wave that you can clearly see to blast the trees to pieces. If it had a fireball the landing zone would be a pile of flames so why would you want a landing zone that is on fire, not smart.
grim967 2 years ago
It's for ground-clearing; the pyrotechnics of other bombs are as much for intimidation value as any "real" effect.
C24B9 2 years ago
what do you mean fail, just take a look at how small the bomb looks, comparing to the earlier images, the bomb is obviously very far away you dumbfucks
mamypokopants 2 years ago
that thing could really ruin your day
dhg4983 2 years ago
No, its not failed !
Tobse4444 2 years ago
failed?
krhonhos 2 years ago
It's massive, can clear a square mile wide helicopter pad, they were used in Vietnam. Now we have slightly more powerful conventional bombs like the MOAB...and I think that's it for now. The BLU-82 has been the largest non nuclear bomb in the US inventory from Vietnam till up to a year or so ago.
coilgunner2 2 years ago 2
it cannot clear a mile - the blast is 100/300 meters at most (which is pretty damn big) with obviously flying debis and metal raining down much further. a mile is 1600 meters....unlikely.
Isthisthelongestname 2 years ago
600 meters to be exact, pressure within the first 100 ft. from explosion is over 1000 per square inch. you can feel the blast from miles away.
depressionrulezme 2 years ago
that is actually a HUUUGGGE explosion its just far away... 15,000 lbs. bomb right there
Sitbuncha 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does not look too impressive
uttergizza 2 years ago
Tell that to the poor bastards within range of the blast.
vansfreek 2 years ago 43
the aftershock looks strong
spyter2 3 years ago
That was it? I was expecting a small nuke or something...
Revelation181 3 years ago
Not much more powerful than a Daisy Cutter except a nuke.
Jesusisyhwh 3 years ago
'cept the MOAB and possibly the Russian FOAB (Hoax?).
Chronobeanz 3 years ago
us weapon?
coolglock19 3 years ago
mexican
Forsete 3 years ago
Lol. Their biggest weapon is their population.
jonesy97 3 years ago 4
LOL
kazama333 3 years ago
hahaha
coolglock19 3 years ago
wow umm..hey
that's area nevada.right??
mexican of weapons and area
nevada..?????
coolglock19 3 years ago
MOAB was better than Daisy Cutter but FOAB was THE BEST CONVENTIONAL BOMB!!!
blackmichelon09 3 years ago
drop an MOAB on them then soldiers wont have to die anymore or use these cuz they arnt being used as of 2008
emk9000 3 years ago
if the daisy cutter aint a fire bomb-mercenaries 2- then wtf
keetonman 3 years ago
thats packed with a few tonnes of aluminium filings.. you can see it at the front of the shock wave..
cuts everything to pieces..
Wahcubist 3 years ago
thats packed with aluminium powder.. you can see it at the front of the shock wave...
Wahcubist 3 years ago
may not look big but im guessing they are a few miles away?
daveywaveydave 3 years ago
that looks so weak of an explosion for such a big bomb. I bet I could be 20 feet from it and if I covered my head I'd be fine
acehimself 3 years ago
you don't know shit about perspective. do you? Did you stop to think that you can't even see the bomb because the camera is so far away. All you can see is the parachute. Therefore it's a BIG blast
unbelievablechops 3 years ago
just look at it, the explosion is probably a maximum of 10 feet across and 5 feet high - even if the camera were a fair distance away, a couple hundred yards or so. It's an extremely weak explosion I think.
acehimself 3 years ago
it's the most powerful conventional bomb in use
unbelievablechops 3 years ago 2
Well that doesn't say much about bombs then today, they should go back to the powerful type from World War II maybe.
acehimself 3 years ago
no. they shouldn't.
unbelievablechops 3 years ago
well I guess not if they want to keep letting the terrorists get away to fight another day. If I was in charge of equipment procurement, 3000 American soldiers lives would have been saved.
acehimself 3 years ago
no.
unbelievablechops 3 years ago
you better believe it! It's purely a matter of power vs. weakness. They've thought they could save money by buying weak bombs but now look at the downturn, I bet those savings have been completely wiped out.
Gates, the secretary now, he is missing a brain! He killed thousands of Americans that could easily still be alive.
acehimself 3 years ago
your stupid. i'm not even going to begin pointing out how wrong you are.
radudman 3 years ago
translation: "I know you're right but am just too stubborn to admit I'm wrong"
acehimself 3 years ago
lmao. unbelievable is right, you have no sense of perception. this IS the blu-82 daisy cuter, would a bomb with just a few feet in diameter blast radius put out THAT big of a shock wave? you can see it clearly after it explodes. and i would say your little translation more apply's to you, rather than me.
radudman 3 years ago
well it's not my fault that I can't empathize with bombs and other people, my guess is that a hand grenade explosion is 438 times larger than this bomb's.
acehimself 3 years ago
If you were in charge of equipment procurement, acehimself, now U.S. would be filling rifle magazines with hand grenades and dropping tin cans on the terrorists...If you have ABSOLUTELY no idea what you're talkin' about, then do everybody the favor of a lifetime and keep your hole shut...
hide86 3 years ago
@acehimself
Tell that to the guys that were ever in BLU-82s blast radius.
leopard2a6mcan 1 year ago
@acehimself
You wouldn't have a head if you were 20 feet away.
leopard2a6mcan 1 year ago
It'd be nice to get the full footage of the explosion. It cuts off before the mushroom cloud forms...
HerrGeneral913 3 years ago
I want to see one impact on Osama's turban.
cdwordsworth26 3 years ago
that's the funniest thing on youtube right there.
nickdc1 3 years ago
did anyone see that shockwave at :13 lol?
detachment345 3 years ago
pretty cool.
I thought there would be a bigger blast.
787superhornet 3 years ago
its the shockwave ya gotsta worry bout!
Hiei999 3 years ago
what Hiel said lol, that concussion blast will scramble your brain worse than an egg if the shrapnel doesnt tear it clear out of your head first
Floridanon407 3 years ago
hmm, pleasant.
HelmutVillam 3 years ago