Added: 2 years ago
From: patssle
Views: 2,071
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The 17-55 2.8 isn't an "L".

  • True, but for a $1000 it should be.

  • Nah, if it were an L it would be a lot more.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more