if they find then original recording tapes, it will get the chance to enchance the image quality much more. Nasa is making a searching in their archives, trying to find where they put the original tapes.
Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin were very careful NOT to talk about seeing stars in their mission, now why would this be? This is a key question for understanding the Apollo H O A X ! Google search: Eric Hufschmid, Apollo, Bart Sibrel, science challenge, Also, take a look at clips from the pathetic Apollo 11 press conference.
Never mind the stars as seen from the moon's surface. Let's see the beautiful photographs of the heavens taken during the half-million-mile-round-trip! These photos possess awe-inspiring clarity of the stars! Has anyone seen them?
That's what I was about to say man. it looks really muddy!
Sometimes I think that they have cut a lot of the footage from the actual 'landing". But yeah I think they used filters to make it a bit more sharp but by doing that they lose contrast. Nasa dollars at work !
Did you know that Apollo missions to the moon used an electronic sextant to line up the stars Rigel and Sirius for midcourse corrections?
rhughatkinson 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake and sad.
Noisycowonline 2 years ago
... and that doesn't speak volumes? That they LOST tapes of the biggest event in science history?? Comeon lemmings .... wake up.
Noisycowonline 2 years ago
if they find then original recording tapes, it will get the chance to enchance the image quality much more. Nasa is making a searching in their archives, trying to find where they put the original tapes.
jerryaltman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin were very careful NOT to talk about seeing stars in their mission, now why would this be? This is a key question for understanding the Apollo H O A X ! Google search: Eric Hufschmid, Apollo, Bart Sibrel, science challenge, Also, take a look at clips from the pathetic Apollo 11 press conference.
gonzoelrichman 2 years ago
RETARD ALERT!!! RETARD ALERT!!!
thewebmaster93 2 years ago
And my daughter could do a better video restoration.
Cowboyloucoalcolatra 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cowboyloucoalcolatra 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hope I live long enough for the next moon missions to find the lander and prove once and for all that we were on the Moon!
Who's with me?
ramairgto72 2 years ago
Never mind the stars as seen from the moon's surface. Let's see the beautiful photographs of the heavens taken during the half-million-mile-round-trip! These photos possess awe-inspiring clarity of the stars! Has anyone seen them?
LoveTurnshateful 2 years ago
They should have asked George Lucas to restore it. There would be imperial walkers in the background.
testohwise 2 years ago 10
Im down with that as long as Jar Jar Binks isnt involved.
CaptainCommode666 2 years ago 2
Erm why does the archive version look better than the restoration?
jedw 2 years ago 10
That's what I was about to say man. it looks really muddy!
Sometimes I think that they have cut a lot of the footage from the actual 'landing". But yeah I think they used filters to make it a bit more sharp but by doing that they lose contrast. Nasa dollars at work !
SPOOKYDONKEY3030 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The 50 stars of the American flag are
the only stars visible from the moon.
SimmerInJuly 2 years ago
1950s version is better.
Failure.
Shack11 2 years ago 7
The moon landing was in 1969.
FAILURE.
Watchmaster 2 years ago
Sorry, typo. See that the "5" key is next to the "6" key. :3
Shack11 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Academy Award for American Special Bullshit Effects
Kartsnam 2 years ago
What effects? All I see is Armstrong reading a plaque while on the moon.
TheOmega11 2 years ago 3
These are such cool videos!
612lakes 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
whoopie goldberg
sk8ratg 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Martha stewart
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago