Added: 3 years ago
From: jessewaugh
Views: 44,537
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (456)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I always thought it was weird that Hiroshima was repopulated almost immediately after the bombing...

    Also, if the US really did have nuclear bombs in the mid 40's, they would have used them on the Soviets before they had a chance to develop their own and spared themselves 50 years of Cold War...

  • @sugardaddy815 Right On Sugardaddy!

  • @sugardaddy815 cold war benefited both side

  • So, nuclear reactors exist but bombs don't?

  • @brizihe This is addressed on NUKE LIES Forum: nukelies dot com

  • I'm not totally convinced but I wouldn't put it passed the government. It was a decent video anyway. Might look for more info on this.

  • @Petronasification It's the red pill that is for skeptics, silly. Anyways, I just visited Japan and several Japanese people agreed with me that nuclear bombs do not exist. You've done a lot of research, but have you seen a nuclear bomb?

  • The reason most of those look fake is because most bomb tests are done in purposely set up towns and artificial forests, though I agree all those videos look terribly fake.

  • How do you explain the radiation and radiation sickness?

  • Current "theory" of matter is woefully unreasonable. The theory is accomodation for math equations. Gluons? Valence? Neutrons? What a crock. However, there are a few good questions about matter that as yet have no answer. One, what is radiation, especially ionizing radiation if there are no atoms? How is "nuclear" power created? What is nuclear waste? Aristotle advised, " Question everything".

    What if it turns out there really are no atom bombs?

  • you should talk about about haarp too

  • @ReptilianV - if you're being given a fortune, that sort of thing costs peanuts (relatively). And they have to spend the money left over from secret bank accounts on something.

  • Hurrr durrr so edgey n cool open yer eyes sheeple

  • @Setsaku Thanks for the positive comment Setsaku. Nice to have a positive response from a person of Japanese descent. People constantly harp on about Hiroshima and Nagasaki but I bet there are plenty of people in Japan who doubt the official bomb story.

  • Terrorism of the people, that's it plain & simple. NIce video! I've felt e same way for years!

  • @emya098 Exactly! Keep the sheep terrified.

  • @jessewaugh I checked out the nukelies site. Very interesting. TY for pointing me there.

  • @emya098 Absolutely Welcome. Hope you're able to join and post!

  • i dont get it!? WHY LIE ABOUT THEM EXISTING?! WHAT DOES THIS ACHIEVE?

  • @bootr0s fear >.>

  • @bootr0s The threat of nuclear holocaust is the cornerstone of the world power structure.

  • @jessewaugh also its a racket. they make billions of dollars like NASA did with the space program (tax dollars).

  • @bootr0s It was a set up for the cold war threat.

  • @bootr0s

    Look at how the external politics it's done all over the world after WW2: No one dares to do something that will upset the so called "nuclear powers" countries...

  • @bootr0s also the "military industrial complex" make billions of dollars selling weapons to the american people (halliburton for example profits with tanks). so other countries jump on the money-making bandwagon of selling the nuke myth (like church passing aroung the offering plate). ...its about power as usual

  • How do you feel about the Tunguska event?

  • @KawaiiDesuNekoBCSK That's an interesting one. It could have been an early test of large capacity explosives marking the beginning of 'the nuclear age.' Or it could have been a meteorite.

  • jesse, will you make another vid on this topic?

  • @yourmajezty I would like to. But I would like it to be full-length and in-depth, so it would require adequate funding.

  • @jessewaugh i think you could and sell DVD's of them. i was considering futhering your discovery with vids of my own. but the time required to do so is insane, and most wont believe it anyway. but i think i will when i have more free time. there is another guy who made a vid on nuke bomb hoax and his is pretty long (bad sound quality).

    "you can get electricity from a potato, but you can make a electric bomb from a potato"

  • @yourmajezty - there's a problem that DVDs are quite easy to copy. I had the same idea myself but shelved it.

  • I've stumbled upon this, and my first impression is that it's ridiculous...another moon hoax - although I am warming to that truth - Perhaps there IS something to this NoNuke theory now, after today's news about the wild fire out of control and destroying all of the Manhattan project land facilities, not forgetting Los Alamos itself. ...funny coincidence isn't it? Like losing the original Moon Landing tape!!!! ;-)

  • @Marty441 Destroy the evidence: Just like 9/11! We're gaining headway.

  • @jessewaugh

    What is latest on the Los Alamos false flag disaster ?

  • @jessewaugh But you dont gain anything from faking 9/11. You cant say invasion of a country cause we were already there in 1995

  • I've been thinking of writing a book about this; if you wan't to collaborate, please contact me.

  • what are movie the clips from?

  • great vid. i doubted it myself

  • @yourmajezty Thanks - come join the forum at nukelies dot com.

  • @jessewaugh

    i asked that question on Yahoo

    you know what they called me??

    a RETARD without any evidence they can call me what they want huh?

  • @mercanaries3 Yeah I think I saw your post on Yahoo Questions. We're leaving the Old World, but a majority of people refuse to budge. It never ceases to amaze me how much people want nuclear bombs to be real. Nukes are kind of like an evil Santa Claus promising much-needed annihilation to the morbidly dependent.

  • @jessewaugh

    LOL the Hydrogen bomb looks exactly like a nuke bomb

    i even gave them a picture to compare the two

    they said "get a life nerd nukes exist and the moon landing was real"

    okay first of all what does bombs have to do with us going to the moon?

  • @mercanaries3 Mercanaries3 Please post NUKE LIES on your YouTube page - I see you have a lot of subscribers.

  • @mercanaries3 Mercanaries3 come join us at NUKE LIES forum - will appreciate your input: nukelies[dot]com

  • Dude you sound like Napoleon Dynamite, anyway you bring up some interesting points.

  • @daylightdisk Thanks I kind of like Napoleon Dynamite - it's like the anti-pinnacle of fashion victimization.

  • So.... the US somehow managed to dumb 30 000 1-ton crates of TNT on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  Or where the Japanese somehow in on the conspiracy too!

  • @EdouardDubois Good questions.

  • So lets assume Hiroshima was carpet/firebombed. How did nobody notice the large numbers of planes required for such an operation? You think the Japanese went along with the A-bomb thing for what reason? It would have been in their interest to make it look like a regular carpet bombing. The psychological effect is much lesser.

    We all know Iraq had nothing to do with WMD's. Although if it HAD, they weren't necessarily nukes, they were also focused on biological and chemical weapons.

  • 2:45 Its The Sun !

  • @Charleslebel88 It's the SUN!

  • @jessewaugh What does that look like to You! Watch it again... IT'S THE SUN!

  • Do you seriously believe all this?

  • @alsetiX No I don't. I'm glad we concur.

  • @jessewaugh what about the Cold War? The reason why America and the USSR never went to war was because of the mutually assured destruction provided by Nuclear weapons. If Nuclear weapons never existed then what were either of those governments afraid of? Lasers? Photon Torpedoes?

  • @WeeklyMusings Perhaps they were in collusion. It has been known to happen.

  • @WeeklyMusings They were in collusion, had been since 1917, & ever since. This is why they never went to war against one another. And they were never afraid of one another, quite the contrary. American Cold War policy was to learn from the Bolshevik model & quietly introduce Communism/Marxism, listen to the Norman Dodd interview given to Edward Griffin. War is a racket, there´s a book of that title. As the Cold War was a hoax, so was WW 2 a hoax, as well as the War on Vietnam & "War on Terror".

  • @jessewaugh The one where you compare a nuke explosion to "high volume dynamite". Not realistic. Is it anything similar to this video? If it is I will certainly watch it.

  • I suppose that osama isn't really dead, he never stopped being a CIA member. I suppose that america is the whole world, anyone who tells you that they went to anywhere that isn't canada, usa, mexico, or anywhere in south america or antartica is actually a government shill.

  • @jessewaugh

    Quite a good point since even if not understanding nuclear weapons meant they don't exist it says nothing about chemical and biological weapons (as thought to be manufactured in Iraq)

  • @jessewaugh

    "Nothing is true, everything is permitted."

  • but was a fire bombing enough to vaporize the one guy in hiroshima? his imprint is still on the steps.

  • @gorgeconowitz you know this is the first vid that ive seen on this but your post is what i thought of when i watched it. you know who burned that picture in my brain of the guys shadow? the government run school system. How do you know that pic is even real?

  • @ratm3413 Exactly. Everyone cites that supposedly vaporized guy as proof. Do they also believe in the Tin Man and Scarecrow?

  • You did a great job on this video. Please keep them coming! Most everything we have been shown as "news" since the first days of television has been fake, made in Hollywood. As Hollywood's creative abilities progressed in the believability factor, the fake news presentations followed. The Japan tsunami looked good - if you don't know what to look for. But it's difficult for Americans to come out of the denial because it's PAINFUL to realize that much of life as we know it has been a lie.

  • @AnOrdinaryAmerican1 Thanks! People cravenly require lies. They convince themselves that lies equal providence. The masses are lazy idolators whose debauched dependence eclipses the depravity of the elite.

  • This is what happens when we let idiots have nice things

  • @mepodnano Okay I had to let this comment pass because it made me lol.

  • @jessewaugh How much education in physics did you have if I may ask??

  • @BassBasherz Educate me.

  • Please tell me how nukes are fake when there are craters and scorched earth where nukes were detonated. For example the Tsar Bomba or Gadget, they left marks of scorhced earth where they were detonated, heck the detonation place of Gadget is a preserved landmark in the desert and people can travel there twice a year and there is still radiation there. Saying nukes don't exist is like saying grass doesn't grow. What about all those people who died in Japan in 1945?

  • All that comes from the media, and that includes alernative news, is psy op and propaganda. It was so 50 years ago, and it is now. Lenin said that cinema is from all art forms most important. Because of its pontential to influence the illiterate masses. son the only way to get to the truth is get your lazy butt off the couch and start to investigate yourself.

  • damn. So this is how people feel why i tell them humans aren't causing global warming...

  • @brizihe The globe warms everyday - at least on my side of it.

  • clouds vaporizing, condensation clouds forming, palm trees bending...

    how did they model that?

    what about japanese or german witness stories? yeah they could have been

    forced or paid to lie but still a conspiracy or hoax like this would incorporate large amounts of people possibly exceeding the number of masons in europe as an example even if they are not being told everything especially ´satanic´ or ´occult´ or ´religious´ or ´philosophical´ or ´idiologic´ details or concepts..

  • @jutubaeh So how many Masons are there in Europe?

  • Lucifer isn´t the sun. It´s the planet which is the carrier of the light, the harbinger of light, "lucis" means "of the lux", it´s what is seen before the rise of the sun in the morning.

  • @kolkrabe19 Thank you. Sounds beautiful.

  • EXPOSED LIES LIES LIES

    watch?v=BnKlHgDBjUI

  • i just saw the tsar bomb documentary looks real. idk what u think

  • @Abcormal hey like Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Or the moon landing perchance and what about loose change. Or the cervical cancer jab or Portland Down.

  • @naemasufi You got info on the cervical cancer jab? They are doing a double up with genital warts vaccine. Also chinese sceintists have joined bird and swine flu, and now have 197? different strains. Apparently. Reported today on AOL News for jabs, and The Star newspaper uk for flu.

  • @TRIPCITY44 Contagion Theory is flawed. Viruses are quasi-organic and do not cause any disease. Microbes are opportunistic and multiply given appropriate environmental conditions. We cause disease by creating bodily imbalance, which avails microbes opportunity to multiply.

  • @jessewaugh Some viruses cause disease, but most do not, such as the harmless HIV. But the potential for scare mongering is very great with viruses, so there is a lot of fraud out there. This induces the public to cling to and put faith in a strong central gov't, to agree to restrict their liberties, and to fund the gov't.

  • @mooninquirer HIV has never been isolated or identified. It is diagnosed by default. That is a good point that "viruses" are used as scare-mongering to create an artificial threat necessitating a protection racket.

  • @jessewaugh ... go to my video with gallo exposed by gary null on the phone, hilarious

  • There are no more snippets of film available of war or peacetime bombings to yet be discovered - - like what later happened with the "moon landings", and which called into question their validity. If there were other more convincing footage in existence, it would have been dug up by the producers of "The Atomic Cafe", a full-length documentary on the bomb question.

  • And the trees still have leaves on them !?! Oh and isn't that the same camera they brought to the moon?

    ~They have been lying to mankind forever.

  • Thanks for this vid. I've always thought the pictures of the house blowing up and the cars were not blown from an outside blast. Your film shows that it actually is from an interior explosion. Excellent summation about the sun too. Yes ~ Lucifarians.

    Great Job!

  • @deec269 Thank you! I just realized after I read your comment that I've never been a very good slave. Perhaps being a good slave comes with benefits: welfare housing at least. But then they might blow it up from the inside and build a freedom tower ;)

  • Jesse, those trees on display at 1:57 show the after effects of a typhoon. I was in Japan in '94 and saw one come through. The pines looked like snapped twigs - just like they do in that still shot shown for a millisecond - and they were up to 2 feet in diameter! I'm sure you can find many more photos like it by doing a google image search. And the reason to lie to the public? It's scary: Wheezy, uh, secretary of state Rice said "we don't want the smoking gun to be a *mushroom cloud." WAR!

  • @NibiruLives And the trees still have leaves on them !?!

  • I just saw your film. Great analysis. We need more people as you to analyze stuff. If it weren't for Simon Shack, I never would have seen the 911 lies.

    Thanks for opening our eyes.

  • What actually happened at Chernoble?

  • @ScalerWave Chernobyl is relatively unimportant in the nuke lies propaganda matrix. I don't know what happened but I would guess that it was a sizeable industrial power generation (or dumpload kettle) explosion. It is really only important in that it serves to reinforce the argument that nuclear bombs probably don't exist because it dispels the establishment radiation half-life paradigm, due to the radiation levels having since significantly abated according to establishment reports.

  • @jessewaugh

    I haven't done any research into the facts around it either but there is still the problem of what is powering nuclear subs and carriers. Even "17 November" the sub tech, agrees that uranium is being used although he doesn't agree with the classic explanation of the fission reaction.  If what he is saying from first hand knowledge regarding nuke sub reactors and uranium fire is true then it stands to reason that the kettling theory regarding land based reactors is not accurate.

  • Comment removed

  • @jessewaugh The radiation levels around ground zero at Prypiat have only subsided as result of a confinement envelope being constructed over the Chernobyl reactors, That work like a sarcophagus blocking most of the neutron radiation from escaping out.

    Nukes exist, or are else you gonna have to believe the Japanese are in on this "grand conspiracy" and agreed to have themselves baked in xrays just to make it look like their thyroid cancers and radiation sickness came from a A-bomb.

  • @Obasiliasfilosofos The Japanese would have a far greater incentive to be in on this conspiracy than any other group in history. They needed the Americans very badly, as an ally against the very powerful Soviet Union and China, AND it allowed them to play the victim, and thus be exonerated for "Pearl Harbor " Bogus medical diagnoses are the easiest thing in the world to do; in fact, consensus medicine demands it, in order to pump up certain epidemiological stats ( HIV = AIDS FACT OR FRAUD ? )

  • @jessewaugh thought you might find this interesting. it's about the Chernobyl accident and how the radiation fallout wasn't as bad as what was portrayed

    google: Chernobyl hoax and it should be the first link

  • @jessewaugh it's called: The Truth About Chernobyl Is Told

  • @backwardworld Very interesting - thank you! According to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) states: "even among the progeny of the survivors of the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who [supposedly] received radiation doses hundreds of times higher than the radiation doses to the inhabitants of regions contaminated by the Chernobyl accident, no radiogenetic disturbances of health have been found." - from 21stcenturysciencetech [dot] com

  • @ScalerWave I believe nuclear reactors exist, and it is precisely for this reason that nuclear bombs do not Did Chernobyl explode ? NO ! In fact, it is always stated that it is IMPOSSIBLE for nuclear reactors to explode ! The worst case scenario is a meltdown. So, the same thing is true for a nuclear "bomb." Subcritical masses brought together would only result in the critical mass getting very hot, melting, and melting the surrounding material.

  • Many of the videos show a blast wave going in one direction and then immediately turning and going back in the other direction. This is evidence of a small explosion nearby which blasted air out and created a vacuum which sucked the air back a few seconds later. It clearly shows that the explosions (which are not even shown) were small scale.

  • @GermanenGerd Interesting - I've not heard this before. Please clarify further. Thank you.

  • @GermanenGerd

    Yeah that is a good point. I also noticed that the timing for the directional change of the wind was rather fast for such a supposedly "large scale" explosion. I would definitely agree that the houses and other structures appear to be models, indicating that the footage is faked.

  • @GermanenGerd Yes, and the models of the houses look very small scale, too. Maybe they were only 1 foot high. And those trees, for this photo, were artificial trees probably just a foot high. Now, the trees being very straight is the one thing that they are admitting is fake. It wasn't a natural forest or even a grove. They claim they cut down trees and cemented them into the ground for this test. Will they also admit that "Ivy Mike" is fake as well ? That is the most obvious one.

  • I never gave it much thought but you do present an interesting position. I'm not convinced that they don't exist but this video does raise the doubt

  • @ScalerWave Thank you.

  • @jessewaugh

    One question going thru my mind is "what is going on in nuclear reactors?". Are you also saying that the atom has not been split?

  • @ScalerWave Rerevisionist has set up an email forum inspired by NUKE LIES, of which I am a part. It has been postulated by members of the forum that "nuclear reactors" are merely dumpload "kettles" used to boil off excess electricity produced by utility companies seeking to create artificial scarcity.

  • Ok, now that's just messed up. At first I thought you were crazy, now I think I am. t. My dad was there shortly after the bombs were dropped and while he didn't go into detail, it must have been horrible. Such is war. If something is fairly short I usually hear it out. Carpet bombs could have done that if enough were dropped. It would still have Japan shocked. Damage would be the same. I don't always want to believe what I see, but I go with the evidence. This poses new questions. Thanks.

  • @hilly777 We can think critically. It is still legal to do so, although they will soon legislate otherwise.

  • @jessewaugh , critically thinking is not allowed. :) This has really given me a reason to muse this over, and after musing I think you are right. The hardest thing to do is to get people to understand when they've been fooled. The longer the duration, or the bigger the lie, the harder that it is for them to believe it. I always wondered why dad and his outfit went in there for medical care right after that and none of them were effected by radiation. It just don't add up.

  • @hilly777 You're right. I was just in the Natural History Museum and they had a picture of an "astronaut" on the "moon." Even though I'm fully aware that the moon landing was a hoax, I looked at the picture hopefully, hoping that I'd see evidence that it could have been real. Then I quickly noticed that the astronaut's shadow and the shadow of a tripod were not parallel, despite their being about six feet away from each other. People tend to be too fearful or pig-headed to admit to being duped.

  • Jesse, I regret to tell you that A LOT of people are saying on other sites that this video was just a parody. However, from what you are saying, as well as your tone of voice, it is very clear to me, upon a first hearing, that you are 100 % sincere about this issue. However, as I am very familiar with the ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT, I am aware that the power of suggestion is more dangerous than these bombs. So, keep this comment high, so I can witness your sincerity.

  • @mooninquirer I sincerely believe that nuclear bombs do not exist. Trolls and naysayers will attempt to deride my message of truth, but this cannot take away from its timeliness. The old world order must and will fail. We are the new owners of the power within humanity to progress away from cowardly and ignorant and morbidly dependent sloth towards a cleaner, brighter, and more enlightened future.

  • @colek711 - just a point of information: isotopes of hydrogen are not unstable. They just aren't common. Deuterium is made by electrolysis of water, in which electric current splits it into hydrogen and oxygen. Deuterium is heavier than ordinary hydrogen, and is slower to move to the electrode; so all you have to do is wait until the water remining has a certain high measured density, and you know you have a lot of deuterium oxide. I presume the same must be true of tritium, which is rarer.

  • I don't really understand how you can just brush aside all of the primary source information out there. What about the victims of Hiroshima who gave first-hand accounts of the single plane that passed over, the lack of air-raid sirens, the mysterious "Disease X," not to mention the POW's from MULTIPLE countries who saw the bombing of Nagasaki happen from the trenches they dug?

  • @viziermoo Primary source? The entire 20th Century was a hoax. Central banks, modern art, multiculturalism, free enterprise, NASA, The Depression, World Wars I and II, the "medical" industry, pop culture, were all an unfathomably immense con. Go ahead and believe your "primary source" - it hasn't done me any good except as a foil.

    You want a primary source? Contact Evelyn Rothschild. He may be able to put you in touch with his superior.

  • @jessewaugh Well said brother.

  • @jessewaugh All of the things you mentioned DO have lies or at least half-truths in them. These lies are a cancer  that has destroyed our brains ---- both what we think we know, and our emotions. But we should be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater, and say everything is a lie. But we should not take for granted as true, anything just because the media or even books say it is true. We need to question everything, and check all references and resources.

  • @viziermoo Please help me out ---- because I want to research this. Tell me where I can read about what you are claiming, other than in John Hersey's "Hiroshima." The very purple prose in that book leads me to question his account. The Japanese would have an ENORMOUS psychological need to agree with this ---- they needed America as an ally, vs. the very powerful Soviet Union, and China --- plus their BUSHIDO would be protected, as there was no dishonor in not fighting " a most cruel bomb."

  • I know nuclear bombs do exist, because Fox and MSNBC said so.

  • @mrbluesfan22 Touché. :)

  • @mrbluesfan22 I know nuclear bombs exist for 2 reasons:

    1. I saw 2 Nevada blasts with my own eyes.

    2. I was a crewman on a nuclear site in 59/60.

    One more thing...The light is so powerful that it does tend to make things look like models. One of the times i saw it i was driving across the mojave heading for Nevada (where i was born) and i saw the Sierra Nevada light up and look like a model railroad setup.

    PS - I don't doubt that some of the footage is fake...

  • @javamanV3 I quote you "I don't doubt that some of the footage is fake." That is the jist of this video so we agree.You wrote:"I saw 2 Nevada blasts with my own eyes." Yes, but what was blasting?

  • @jessewaugh You have me there - I couldn't be absolutely sure it was an atomic bomb - Just as you can't be absolutely sure that it wasn't, but the point is mute. In both cases i had physical comparisons to be made in size and distance and in one case there were broken windows in a town i drove through later that was roughly 100Mi from the blast. Also as a kid in northern Nevada, we used to see the clouds come over after a blast was reported in the paper. Something BIG was happening.

  • @javamanV3 and how old are you supposed to be now? and what did you see? was in nuclear? or was it many bomb devices? or could it have been another form of device? how do you know for certain what it was?

  • Jessewaugh

    Thank you for this video. You have found out one the biggest scams since the holohaox and 911.

    They cannot and have not "split the Atom". There are no "Nuclear bombs".

    To the believers show us one example of a modern Atomic / Nuclear explosion that is not from a Hollywood movie. Every war since WW2 is always a long protracted war were soldiers dying and the US or USSR debt increases; yet one bomb would get an instant surrender.(Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, Vietnam...) lies

    5 stars!

  • Thanks for uploading ! Certainly this is among the most informative and compelling videos I've seen. I am 100 % certain that this footage is faked. Yes, that is some liquid in a laboratory, overlaid on the sun, for the supposed H-bomb test. Not only is it fake, it is a very cheesy production, and it is amazing people believed it at all. We are much more sophisticated today compared to back then, and not just in technology ---- we are rightfully less trusting of the government.

  • @mooninquirer Thanks - I agree the liquid composite is one of the most obvious fakeries, and I appreciate your acknowledging that. I'm getting kind of tired of so much gullibility. But most of the negative comments I get are obviously from provocateurs.

  • Thank you for creating this bold and informative video series

  • @telesniper2 Thank you

  • @telesniper2 Thank you

  • jessewaugh, do you believe that 9/11 was an inside job?

  • @chanel6548 yes

  • @jessewaugh ever thought about making a 9/11 was an inside job video?

  • @chanel6548 No - I've known from the day that it was demolished using explosives. I ran from the corner of West St. and Vesey when the south tower fell. I got interviewed by a camera guy and told him there's no way those came down on their own, and the powers that be were responsible.

    Not to be overly cynical but anyone who still needs convincing isn't worth the effort.

  • @jessewaugh There are also many others to do videos on the fact that 911 was an inside job. Say, did you see molten metal at ground zero ? I wish I could say I believed 100 % it was a hoax from day one, but because of a phenomenon explained in this youtube video : ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT, I and many others accepted the official story. But the boxcutter story always seemed very implausible to me, and cell phones can make calls from INSIDE planes ?

  • @mooninquirer Why does the boxcutter story seem implausible? Do you know what a boxcutter is? Have you ever seen one? They're knives. Think about it- professional terrorists who prepared long before hijacking planes vs. civilian pilots. Isn't it obvious? And did you not know phones can make calls from inside planes? Well, they can indeed.

  • @pineapplebaron Because the passengers would have just walloped them with their carry-on luggage. Cell phones are better now, with more antennae, but at the time and several years afterward, cell phone calls would just be dropped whenever one went inside a building, or in a car passing. The content of the cell phone calls is highly suspicious --- some say they THINK they were hijacked. Especially if it WERE with boxcutters, the stewardesses would give out a bloodcurdling scream.

  • @mooninquirer not even a single cellphone in 2002 . this whole thing was to justify the war and to make everyone afraid of muslims so they can go there and take the oil and spread christianity by force . george war bush didn't even bother to leave the school when they secret service informed him about the attack . and the ( fake ) person who made the call from the plane , he mentioned his full name when he spoke to his mother , since when ppl say their full names when they call their own parents

  • i hope there fake cuz i worry of nuclear war everyday

  • Great job! Very intersting.

  • @AntimatterRadio Thank you!

  • Amazing special effects can be accomplished without computers. A recent motion picture "The Fountain" used such techniques:

    watch?v=bx7TroR06-Q

  • How long will it take before these idiotic Hollywood hoaxes will be uncovered to the masses?

  • @DoomNoMore The "Moon Landing" has been shown to be a complete fabrication, yet it would seem a majority of people still choose to believe in it.

    It's just like 9/11 - people do not want to believe that they have to work for themselves. They'd rather remain sucking on the tit of the nanny state. The masses and the totalitarianists are equally parasitical.

  • @jessewaugh A lot of hoaxes exist. Theres quite some interesting ones on the internet. I found a lot of them when looking for them. 

  • @jessewaugh it's not unusual that most people choose their beliefs, society nurtures the idea of faith over reason via it's use of religions, superstitions and ritualistic practices.

    We're wired to believe what makes sense to us and if reality doesn't make sense to us then we find something that does. It's human nature to accept things as they appear to be but it's also human nature to pacify fear with escapism/ the greater the overabundance of fear in the world the wider that curve becomes.

  • and even if they are real,one nuclear bomb only one strike can cause others as well to be launched which results end of the world... I say America and world stop using our money for war and war equipment (50% of total funds over the world goes to weapons)

  • relating the past comment a Serbian scientist also known as Nikola Tesla personally said to Albert that he is a fool experimenting on atoms... Albert failed and created something else... Alternative source of energy that was very deadly and toxic using the radioactive material and creating more of that... For some reason world awarded Albert... maybe the future most mass murderer...

  • Another thing, as far as I know the only thing that can be made from collision or separation or whatever Albert did u can create a black hole... Atomic bomb is considered to be something like that am I right? atoms under a large pressure explode and inflict chaos... blah those are the lies... now day atomic bombs are just a fail on what Albert worked on... NATO and other world powers only posses the power of altering human to worse, degrading our DNA and making civilizations slowly fade away...

  • look nuclear bombs aren't powerful to reduce whole cities to ashes, on the contrary it acts like a regular ballistic missile just with a lot radioactive material which can pollute everything in enormous area for a millions of years... look at the Chernobyl, where everyone got sick after the accident, every house is at its place but there is no people... Atomic bomb=chemical and toxic disaster

  • If they do exist wouldn't the entire planet be contamainated with nuclear fallout?After-all ,how many supposed nuclear devices have they supposedly detonated in their alleged experiments...Thousands???Than where is the fallout and why has life in Nagasaki and Hiroshima completely returned to normal?Interesting video.

  • @friedchickenlittle Quite right - it's becoming increasingly obvious that nuclear bombs are very unreal.

  • @jessewaugh well, nuclear powerplants are a reality today, and its easier to create an uncontrolled release of energy than one thats regulated. therefore, nuclear bombs exist.

  • @Krogoth04 That is an invalid syllogism.

  • @Krogoth04 No, because the explanation of nuclear weapons require a conventional explosive to compress the fissile material into a "supercritical" state. This requires the pressure from the detonator to overcome all pressure from the fission of all the material. If it can't contain it, then at some point when only a small material has reacted, it would scatter the rest of the material. Therefore it is impossible to create an explosion much greater than the detonator itself.

  • @telesniper2 Very good explanation. The requirement for supercriticality applies to the Plutonium bombs. I would also add, that no chemical explosion is going to compress any metal. Gas, sure.  But not metal. It might BEND the metal outwards, and break it, but it would never reduce it in volume. Think about a cannon with an enormous plug at one end.

  • @Krogoth04 I do not accept this argument. I believe nuclear power plants exists, but what is the maximum release of energy in a supposed nuclear critical mass of uranium could be just it getting extremely hot, and giving off radiation.  I see no reason for for it to explode. I see that for black powder, because the nitrate releasing oxygen, combining with sulfur and carbon to produce gases sulfur and carbon dioxide, which expand.

  • @friedchickenlittle you have to understand that over time, radioactive particles would diffuse as evenly over an area as much possible, like when you add a drop of food dye to a glass of water. in this case, setting off an a bomb is like dropping a drop of food dye into a swimming pool; it will eventually diffuse into the atmosphere and it would be hard to pick up due to background radiation from other sources such as the sun.

  • great video. the narrator sounds like Jay, from Jay and Silent Bob.  Good stuff.

  • The passive radiation in the air worldwide spiked in the 1940s after nuclear bombs started being tested.

    You can tell this by running an extremely sensitive geiger counter over any vegetable matter harvested before the 40s - furniture, canned food, paints, whatever - and comparing to anything harvested after.

  • @MooffinMan - Do you possess an extremely sensitive geiger counter? I ask partly because my detailed metrology text book has no info whatever on detecting any tpye of radiation popularly linked to nuclear weapons

  • Part 2.

    So, the deal was struck. By collaborating with the USA/Zionist Regime, the Japanese had to make a sacrifice to prove their pledge of allegence. Its not like the leaders were to be killed, rather the people. All you need is plenty of TNT and an industrial nation can make millions of tons whenever it needs to, real quick.

    Any Country that the AllEYEZ (allies) claim to have "Nuclear Weapons" are actually allied with the AllEYEZ even if made to appear an enemy. This way, it seems real.

  • Great Video,

    I honestly always new that they didn't exist anyways. Your very articulate.

    Before "nuking" nagasaki and hiroshima, Japan had surrended 7 days earlier. But the transmission was delayed because of no modern technology to reach the "AllEyes (allies).

    The above is what we are led to believe.

    Japans Shadow Government was always a sellout anyways, working for another order with other interests. Remember the movie "The Last Samuri"? The Japs sold out ages ago.

  • @masons20 That's an important point: The Japanese Government is no less compromised than any other first world government.

  • @masons20

    Very true. I am coming to this conclusion too. Japans Government was very probably a part of the conspiracy. I have heard that, during some times, a blackout was put on informations coming from Japanese people about the so called nuclear bombing. Why doing that, if the bombing was really a nuclear one ?

  • @voerioc The Japanese government of WW2 was in the control of xenophobic militarist who took power from the emperor(a lover a western culture). He made a plea to his royal friends in England who sent America to take care of his enemies who were all killed on the islands of the Pacific and executed after the war. The allies never planned on invading Japan at all, only to put their man back in power!

  • Im not some redneck who loves nukes and guns etc, i actually hate guns and wish nukes and guns didnt exist. But your video shows very very little proof of anything. All that you've shown is "what does this look like? idk, could be something else", which simply doesnt hold any water. You also point out your lack of knowledge on multiple points by saying such things. I agree, out government is fucked, and in the beginning you showed 9/11. I agree, 9/11 they definately lied about but to what extent

  • @hockeygod9911 - the video hints at faked film of nuclear tests. I was intrigued and thought I'd check it. I bought (and found) DVDs including material from the 1940s and 1950s, and later, purportedly showing nuclear tests. On examination (preferably with film editing software, to allow slow motion and freeze frames) it was clear Jess Waugh was right - the film was faked. There's at least one group investigating.