@Hiei1314 Because it was supposed to be extinct 11 millions years ago. They have found fossilized remains, and according to the remains, not only did it not go extinct, it does not show any trace of "evolving" from the fossil remains.
@BrianMason1000 I'm just going to say that that doesn't mean anything. For all the evidence to support evolution, this one little rock rat is far from being a "wrench" in the theory. A full response would be too lengthy, so just read up more on the theory, and you'll see why your argument is so weak. I won't reply anymore, so good luck.
@Hiei1314 It doesn't mean anything? What are you talking about? It means something on both sides of the argument! It is not MY argument anyway. A full response would be too lengthly. Wow that is rich!
oops, gotta revise my science books again. Who was the brilliant person who said this animal was extinct 11 million years ago? Does he have egg in his face.
great.
tommyriantoro 1 year ago
haha itz chinky lmao
XxsumlaokidxX 1 year ago
i herd that thats the species scratt from ice age is on wikipedia
0gunman 2 years ago
Such a cute little rodent, like its cousins.
AlleyRatte 2 years ago
its so cute! I want one!
mkristi18 3 years ago
its so tame.
goldenage 3 years ago
Wow, scientists thought this little guy was long extinct? That's amazing! How long ago did they discover it?
Hiei1314 3 years ago
@Hiei1314 Yup! Another wrench in the Evolution Story.
BrianMason1000 10 months ago
@BrianMason1000 Wait, what? How?
Hiei1314 10 months ago
@Hiei1314 Because it was supposed to be extinct 11 millions years ago. They have found fossilized remains, and according to the remains, not only did it not go extinct, it does not show any trace of "evolving" from the fossil remains.
BrianMason1000 10 months ago
@BrianMason1000 I'm just going to say that that doesn't mean anything. For all the evidence to support evolution, this one little rock rat is far from being a "wrench" in the theory. A full response would be too lengthy, so just read up more on the theory, and you'll see why your argument is so weak. I won't reply anymore, so good luck.
Hiei1314 10 months ago
@Hiei1314 It doesn't mean anything? What are you talking about? It means something on both sides of the argument! It is not MY argument anyway. A full response would be too lengthly. Wow that is rich!
BrianMason1000 10 months ago
@Hiei1314 The "evidence" to support Evolution? LOL Still looking for the "Missing link". Do you have it?
BrianMason1000 10 months ago
@BrianMason1000 Here are some "Living Fossils" No evolution:
1 fungi, 14 Mammals, 7 Birds, 5 Reptiles, 2 Amphibians, 1 Lamprey, 7 Boney Fish, 6 sharks, 8 insects, 3 Crustaceans, 4 Mollusks, 7 other invertabrates. All of these species have Fossilized evidence without Evolutionary effects.
BrianMason1000 10 months ago
oops, gotta revise my science books again. Who was the brilliant person who said this animal was extinct 11 million years ago? Does he have egg in his face.
unocomm 3 years ago
yea the viper looks deadly
newcomer9747 3 years ago
these discoveries make me want to be a zoologist... but i'm studying architecture... aww...
hismajestykingston 3 years ago 3
That is what Yahoo is saying. That viper looks awesome.
TVRf4N 3 years ago
Do you know the name of that pit viper they have pictured? They didn't say anything about it.
boxsterwelby 3 years ago
Gumprechts green pitviper
TVRf4N 3 years ago
there were over a 1,000 new species found right?
MrSmileyHasABigDong 3 years ago