@Bossk333 And about this Vine Street thing, if people act like jerks, they get what's coming to them anyway, for example lower real estate prices are a bitch aren't they? :) Who wants to live next to criminals and bigots?
@Bossk333 It's too bad you don't realize you're contradicting yourself. You support segregation: "Segregation is truly the only way to overcome racism."
Segregation IS discrimination by definition, I'm sorry to say, it won't solve anything, it will only strengthen irrational tribal bondage and divide the people. We'll be set back hundreds of years by this.
Interracial personal relationships can work just fine if neither party is indoctrinated with the dogma of tribalism.
@LibertarianRealist So you would support segregation for the sake of "aesthetics"? LOL
Well at the end of the day you're free to select your spouse based on whatever criteria you want (even if it's shallow "I IS ONLY DATE WHITES HERPADERP!"). Just don't expect anyone else to and we won't have a problem.
Theres a bit of a problem with your comparison of wanting to save species from extinction and lack of care about preserving races.
As you say races are evolutionary and their merging in to one is perfectly natural and darwinian. Saving species from extinction is not saving them from evolving in to a new species it is saving them from total extinction.
When you focus on meaningless details it sure does make black people seem so much different to justify your view of a lower evolutionary state. But when you contrast it with the similarities such a view dissolves. Which is why someone like you is considered racist by mainstream culture: You seek justifications for your presumption of the inferiority of black people.
My own belief is that the different racial groups within humanity came into being at a VERY early stage of human history and that they were the consequence of divine decree. True, this is not a strictly 'scientific' perspective but the inability of science to cope with the historical and cultural realities of racial difference only reveals the intense limitations of science.
It is very striking that the various races of mankind have apparently popped into existence fully formed, or at least with no clear line of ancestral development. There is not a scrap of evidence in the human fossil record, such as it is, to show the emergence over long periods of different racial groups. For such diversification to have taken place, for example from negroes to nordics would have required innumerable 'intermediate types'. The meagre human fossil record contains none.
Also, the genetic variation inside Africa is so huge that defining such a thing as a Negroid race is stupid. You would end up with multiple races in Africa if it was a hardcoded observable "biological" entity.
But you probably dont care about variation in Africa. It is conceptually easier to consider them all the same.How is race NOT A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT when it BASED ON INDIVIDUAL PERCEPTION? What might be black and white to you might be grey to others.
So ok lets say its biological.... then please list/map out the different "races" for me?... since they are apparently so taxonomically significant that they need their own grouping. And if you cant come up with more than 4 human races, then wow, planet earth must be an environmentally diverse place.
Caucasians are being hung by Russians based on their perceived ethnicity as we speak. How ironic huh? I guess I would have to be white to see the difference between them.
@chiefkyle1 Re: social construct. I mean, the race thing was given credibility during the time when there were a shitload of white slaves too. And it became obvious among both blacks and whites that the handful of rich were fucking everybody over. Poor whites/blacks were pretty close friends actually. This was the threat to the establishment that began the whole mess. Whites hit easy street overnight, and were fed the propaganda about being better naturally to divide the poor by race. savvy?
@chiefkyle1 The PROBLEM starts when the term race, (which denotes specific genetic difference beyond those of any humans) starts being used to classify people genetically in relation to their current position within society. Blacks for example, are an oppressed people, who to this day are judged in a race where they had their shoelaces tied, werent given a map, and not offered much food or water so to speak to sustain them during the race. Now its fair to point and say "im smarter?"
@chiefkyle1 Do you think the current system caters to minorities? Honestly? And Minorities is not a term coined to denote race, but numerical aspects of a population. Anyways, there in no denial that there are different people all through the world. Its not the elephant in the room you make it out to be. Irish people with red hair and freckles vs an italian with jet black hair for example: You would not seperate them by "race" but im guessing you would go with "nationality" right? Both "white"?
@ThisPageStaysREAL I think the elephant in the room is actually the very nature of the black and white relationship. As its proven that the relationship is symbiotic. In some ways i do agree with classifications, but id say its best to think of people in terms of nations. The black nation/white nation etc. Then its kinda simple to see that "minorities" as in blacks problems stem from a homeland that is now foreign, and a home they built in slavery, but werent welcomed in as free people. right?
@chiefkyle1 What you call it is up to you, im just saying its hard to call bullshit on science. Of course there are differences in species of dogs, however i think those differences are apparent to science as well. An arguement from ignorance is to toss science out the window and give scientific value to self identification. Mind you, the bulk of all this "intellectual" talk of race differences comes from a nation with test scores that point to retardation when compared to other nations. hmm
@chiefkyle1 As has been proven and not yet contested " if there is a genetic marker for race, it has not been found" so until otherwise, races as more than self defined states, do not exist. Everything people would normally use to define race are all found within the same "races" and with greater variations. Its simple science. We would need something genetic, specific to each type of "race" in order to assert that race outside a social classification actually exists. thats all.
@chiefkyle1 the things you are talking about, like Skull shape, brain cavity size etc.. you do know that those things cant be used to determine "a race" as you claim right? if some arkane machine just ripped a brain out of a skull and just weighed them.. we wouldnt be able to ID who was who based on weight..
@chiefkyle1 No i dont agree because there are two schools of theory on brain size, and the one most logical is the one that in general would point size not being a factor among humans, as evident in male and female brains being of differentaverage sizes, but no links shown to support anything on the topic. There is also the theory that brain size in relation to body size plays a big role in abilities. but who knows. Our African ancestors brains were much smaller? How much would you say?
@chiefkyle1 No i dont agree because there are two schools of theory on brain size, and the one most logical is the one that in general would point size not being a factor among humans, as evident in male and female brains being of differentaverage sizes, but no links shown to support anything on the topic. There is also the theory that brain size in relation to body size plays a big role in abilities. but who knows. Our African ancestors brains were much smaller? How much would you say?
@chiefkyle1 That statement requires those pesky genetic markers for race which have thusfar been able to elude the field. It also makes a huge unsupported leap in stating that what a society considers valuable and its goal to secure that value are things that A. spawn genetic advancement, or B. its opposite. And can you provide me with an example of how a deduction made without proper context can be presented as common sense? Why not just, rough speculation for example?
Why do all conservatives insist on fooling themselves constantly? I dont really get it. Im sure almost every moron who likes to just chop a population in half using libs/cons has HAD to had thought,..."what if its a scam?" I think the difference between the 2 groups boils down to 1 key belief. One group HONESTLY believes that poor people are the reason they haven't been able to flourish lol. Or e.g. "If the poor were gone, 70% vs. 1% would hold the 95% of the wealth.
@chiefkyle1 Its people like you, that are usually missing a few gigs in the critical thinking department. You have the base model brain, and sadly nature didn't select you for a spin through the oprtions room on the house. People like you, just need a snapshot of something to send your "lil' mind that thought it could" into motion. "Naturally" is a dangerous word when used by an idiot. Let me then ask, Are the Irish naturally more violent than the British? or Sunni vs. Sheia? Whats nature say?
Well, we are mostly from a group that left Africa, but Africans mixed with an older group, and Eurasians mixed with Neandertals and Denisovans to varying extents. Some anthropologists like, Dr. Jonathan Hawks, speculate that the Denisovans could be Homo erectus. If that is true then Homo erectus was a race of human. Some new evidence suggests that Homo erectus originated in Southern Europe around Georgia before coming to Africa. Therefore, we might all be Europeans.
I'm going to post a video soon going a bit more in depth on the "We are all Africans" thing since that slogan is plaguing my video comments. Just so you know, I'm not totally stealing your idea. Not entirely :)
also, if a "race" of nordic ppl went extinct it would be from a mass event you tool! Have you NO idea what your speaking about or what? If for example, ZOMGcriss had a child with a spanish guy and that child if male, knocked up a japanese woman for example, the child would still be outed via DNA testing. So just because the blond hair is gone, says NOTHING about a race being extinct! hahaha.. i can see why you feel Ruka is a fountain of knowledge. yikes!
@6GreatDaneLover6 haha, you know David Duke also strongly believes in every one of the hack viewpoints you just vomited up...moron. Im no fan of ol' Doc Dookie but i'll give him credit on those excerpts of his twisted logic. The rest can go into the dumpster. By the way, international is just one word. I dont see any reptilians outside of the pet stores, and re: the Nazis vs. Jewish Freemasons... would i see 1 group or the other, or both? 911 truther? 100% they found themite, lots. Ur turn :)
@6GreatDaneLover6 haha, you know David Duke also strongly believes in every one of the hack viewpoints you just vomited up...moron. Im no fan of ol' Doc Dookie but i'll give him credit on those excerpts of his twisted logic. The rest can go into the dumpster. By the way, international is just one word. I dont see any reptilians outside of the pet stores, and re: the Nazis vs. Jewish Freemasons... would i see 1 group or the other, or both? 911 truther? 100 % they found themite, lots. Ur turn :)
racially he's chinese?? hahaha... derr derr derrrrr... how about saying" the child looks like he's from china?" If a white person claimed African, he could BE from Africa. And what does being jailed for lying on a form have to do with the "race" the person lied about being?? haha thats a crime example, not an argument about the penalty for saying you're black... moron! hahaha
8:14 Why are you using diagrams from the 1930's? The chimpanzee skull looks more like the European skull than the African does! Don't be TOO retrogressive now...people might not trust you haha
The shirt is equivocal to 'the layman on the street'. However, the shirt isn't meant to be taken literally in society at large. You take the statement out of context and use its implications in a literal sense. If you were scientifically literate, then you would have marvelled at such a statement or even found it witty. Only people who don't like to be associated with 'Africans' or have a opposing fixed veiw on their roots would find the shirt irritating or offensive...
What is amusing to me is that those leftists who wax lyrical about the joys of racial diversity are the very same people who splutter with indignation at any suggestion that all of this diversity might be accompanied by certain racial differences.
@atticana ZomgitsCriss doesn't prefer racial diversity. She doesn't have a preference...but you do. And I haven't seen proof for any difference in intelligence.
@TemporalDissonance 'And I haven't seen proof for any difference in intelligence.' Oh really? Well my dear fellow, just look at Africa, then look at Europe. Need more proof?
@atticana You do know that all civilizations fluctuate in sophistication. If genetics determined the development of a region, then this would not be the case...evolution doesn't happen fast enough to influence the exchange of resources, which is all it come down to.
@TemporalDissonance LOL witha vengeance! So please my good sir, tell me when Africa went through its sophisticated period? Or must we wait a bit longer for the period of African sophistication? I'll try not to hold my breath!!!
1/2 @atticana Why are you focusing on Africans? I'm not saying that all areas of the world achieve the same amount of success in any given time. I'm saying that it is the climate and availability of resources that determines sophistication. You chose Africa because it has a terrible climate and availability of resources, and...oh look, they're underdeveloped.
@TemporalDissonance Forgive me, but your ignorance is almost cosmic in its proportions. Africa is very rich in resources and it has a very good climate for humans to live in. Otherwise why would multinational companies and the Chinese be so anxious to get involved with Africa? Personally I would follow Harold MacMillan's advice concerning the Dark Continent...build a great wall around it and peek in every thousand years or so to see if there's any sign of civilisation emerging.
@atticana My ignorance? I can't even comment on your hyperbole about building a wall. Africa is lacking in fresh water, which crucial to having a food surplus...which is crucial to a developing as a region. There's a huge disparity between fresh water in sub-saharan africa, and in other areas of the world.
@atticana My ignorance? I can't even comment on your hyperbole about building a wall. Africa is lacking in fresh water, which crucial to having a food surplus...which is crucial to a developing as a region. There's a huge disparity between fresh water in sub-saharan africa, and in other areas of the world.
@TemporalDissonance 2/2 There's always going to be a correlation between availability of resources, and genetic history without immigration, but when the people do leave, they're held back by people who hyperfocus on race, and associate them with the people who are still stuck in an underdeveloped area.
@atticana lol, did you know that immigrants from Africa coming to both Europe and America to further study average higher test scores and grades than their fellow students?
@atticana The state of Africa has little to do with the intelligence or lack of in some cases. Africa is a textboox example of what happens to a mineral rich nation when Europeans get news of it. Africa today is the result of European control of African assets, who exclude the people of Africa from their own game. Thats why you hear about those killings of white south africans etc. Btw, I dont think you or even I as an American have the right to point to another place in mockery. look @ the US
@ThisPageStaysREAL TRANSLATION: 'I am a white liberal who thinks that all of Africa's problems are caused by the white man.' Well, that lets Robert Mugabe off the hook!!! And Julius Malema too if he ever becomes leader of South Africa. (the next Robert Mugabe?)
@atticana Actually yes, most all Africas problems were created by, or stem from white men. Now hear this, that DOES NOT MEAN YOU, just cause it was Europeans and whites that caused many of the worlds problems, does that mean you are to blame? Of course not man. But this whole defy and deny act is just foolish. Being "white" and being one of the so called "white man" are very different. Stop making excuses for shit you didn't do, and start trying to repair the damage that was done man.
@ThisPageStaysREAL I don't deny that the white man has got a lot to answer for. But the best way of resolving these problems is for the white and black races to be kept as separate as possible and for Africa to be left to its own devices. After all, if what you say is true, then a withdrawal from Africa by the white man would solve most of Africa's problems!!!
@atticana Do me a favor and disregard what temporal said, just cause its not based in any reality. I know he means well, but yea.. Anyways, you are correct about the seperation, but here again he, (not you dude) the "white man"rears his head to screw us both over. See, Africa is probably the most mineral and resource rich continent on earth, the problem is "the man" currently has control of most of it, and has no intention of sharing with africans..or any hard working whites for that matter.
@atticana You need to realise how the game is played. Japan prior to recent events, was a solid 2nd in terms of wealth. But it has NO resources of its own. Similar to both Europe, and the US actually. I take it you know we arent in these conflicts to liberate shit, maybe liberate some resources from the rightful owner. Now, its done thru destablization, no mystery. Then as in Africas case, the situation is pointed at, with no context. So a logical mind can easily think "wow..what fuckups"
Japan's economy is export oriented towards electronics and auto-industry. They were able to achieve success through mercantile economic policies. Also realize Japan is a social-democracy. Before the disaster Japan lost its #2 status. The disaster Japan has now is not the cause of Japan losing its economic position. A strong yen is hurting Japan. Japan has had two decades of the lost decade. Africa is actually about to begin an economic boom within the next few decades
Also Japan had large deposits of coal (still do), Anyway Japan is probably the only limited resource country that isn't exploiting through imperialism (yea they pay to import most of their most needed supplies thus Japan is quite an expensive country to live in take it form me I was a student in Japan. tough times even Ramen cannot save you XD)
@atticana The coup de gras is how that same white man who has a WHOLE lot to answer for, has planted the idea that you to are guilty by association ( or artificial concepts of race?) . This is what causes the tension, same way the FED, has racked up that wild debt, and its pawned off as "our national debt" its complete bullshit. There are no additional white handouts beyond those given currently, as a "1st class citizen". Society is made to accomodate whites, but not increase the crumb rations.
@atticana In fact, is it so hard to believe? Dont tell me you are one of the people who thinks America is some beacon of knowledge or an example of intelligence in motion lol. The interesting thing is, (to me anyway) how all you racists or "realists" talk about blacks having lower IQs than whites, while the only IQ test you have ever taken was on facebook, and you speak from a position thats laughed at by every other industrial nation on earth. To top it off, you argue logic with emotion lol.
Excellent video and I feel the same conclusion about HeyRuka now. Judge people by their actions as it were.
Crypto-Jews are nothing new (Iberian history in particular) and with disastrous results, but she must be honoured. It takes guts to do what HeyRuka has done.
I say this all the time. If race doesn't exist then there are an awful lot of people who need to be released from prison and given some sort of compensation for being convicted of a hate crime that could not physically possibly have been committed.
Most people only subscribe to ZOMG because of her looks. I thought all atheist understood evolution but she doesn't otherwise she would know race is real.
i almost gave thumbs down to this video....when i heard the ending i decided to give it thumbs up.
i dont think there is any racial supremacy, i believing in all races living together in one community, as in india or america....but some people who force racial mixing are even worse.
Yes, I think Pinker is disinformation myself too. There's a reason Harvard has elevated him recently and my own personal opinion is that he serves the purpose of spinning the emerging evidence (particularly GWAS evidence) of human/racial inequality into a left-liberal narrative. In effect Pinker is very much part of the mainstream, and accepts mainstream liberalism - He's useful for the status quo as a result, because they've learned they can no longer promulgate tabula rasa.
Socrates856 primary reasoning for his faith is an objection to Principal Component Analysis as a way of clustering racial groups, it's a sort of advanced form of race denial, roughly analagous to the sorts of very nice sounding chaff ID proponents throw up (though ID proponents are generally more academically honest than race deniers). I can go into more detail about mathematically illiterate PCA denial if you'd like, it follows a fairly linear pattern.
@addendum044 Haha, delete your own comment realizing that you admitted your lie:
"I'm not a liar, you've dug up a few papers criticizing PCA and you've made it a mainstay of your arguments. I doubt you even realize why it's necessary. The whole point is that those ranges do exist, but can only be properly understood with a non-redundant dataset."
The lie is that you had no clue before about PCA yet pretended that you did and I exposed it. And given your paragraph above, you still have no clue.
My second comment more or less corresponds in meaning to the first one, I just disliked the wording of the first. This is hardly something to trumpet as a victory.
Anyway, I'm well aware of what PCA is - Namely a method by which heterogeneous swarms of data are transferred (by orthogonal transformation) onto two or more eigenvectors. Now admittedly my mathematics isn't perfect, but I'm aware of why this procedure is necessary and its importance. You evidently, are not.
@addendum044 Evidently you couldn't formulate my position if your life depended on it.
Your PCA description isn't bad for someone who really doesn't understand it. So tell me. What dictates the number of eigenvectors? Is that dictated by the data? Or is that dictated by the researcher? And what is the final step after having gotten the eigen-decomposition to actually get what one would call principal components. What makes them "principal"?
Eigenvectors are calculated using eigenvalues, And the final stage is the conversion into standard scores followed by the projection of that data, as for what makes it principal, it's because they're the principal components that define differences between racial groups (after eliminating the variables that contribute nothing to the data).
The whole point is that those ranges do exist, but can only be properly understood with a non-redundant dataset. But please, whine more :)
@addendum044 Nice googling. Not quite right, but I like that you at least try to get it right. It certainly is not any projection that makes an eigenvector principal. "Principal" has nothing to do with projection. Components are indeed eigenvector/value pairs. But what makes them principal is the eigenvalue. So what do we do with eigenvalues to complete the PCA? You'll have to google more to figure out why that is true.
Care to explain, what, if anything I'm lying about? In before the same hackneyed old arguments you've been trotting out on a hundred different videos for years.
@Hereditarian Let me put it like this: Rushton never has and never will publish this graph in this form in any peer reviewed publication. And there are multiple reasons for this, only a few of which I have given in the video.
That you don't think it's doctored mostly means that you do not know what the standards in academia is for faithful representations of graphs.
She's committed to getting the truth out? She misquotes her sources on multiple counts, uses the doctored graph from Rushton etc. In fact she cites sources that she clearly hasn't read, because she couldn't possibly saying what she is saying if she had read them.
Incidentally she makes exactly the same misquotations as MrHerrIQ. I guess errors propagate unchecked.
@HeyRuka Sure. You claimed that approval by anthropologists of race is rising when the very papers you cite (Lieberman specifically) documents the opposite. The numbers you cite are wrong and on all counts too high. The number of Europe is actually just Poland which is the extreme outlier, the European number is substantially lower. You use the graph from Rushton's booklet that I documented is doctored.
May well be more. It's obvious that many of the sources you cite you haven't read in full.
@HeyRuka Well not really. Of all these points you have half-acknowledge but brushed aside one. And that's the Polish vs European point. The rest? I don't recall you having acknowledged. There are no corrections to your video anywhere and frankly I have seen no evidence at all that you have in any way acted as if you acknowledge any of these points, nor even checked for them.
Basically you have a video up with a number of pieces of misinformation. And that doesn't even touch the politics.
@socrates856 That's why I remember you. Pretty sure we talked about this. I included several European studies in my sources, not just the Polish study. None of them contradict my results. If I didn't include the studies I will go back and put them in. Bottom line, there is no consensus. As for the graph, where are you getting your info? I've read the books and critiques and critiques of critiques and I'm familiar with everything I sourced. I'm confident in my presentation.
@HeyRuka Sorry, but don't BS. You offer inline citations. Those are the sources that are supposed to support your claims. They do not. The additional sources too do not support your claims. As for Rushton's doctored graph, I have a video up that explains why I claim it's doctored. It also demonstrates that FE hasn't read original sources incidentally, and misrepresents the study.
So surely, that is no lack of confidence. I would argue that's a big part of the problem.
It's amusing how he consistently claims he has no political axe to grind, yet he's on these videos morning, noon and night pushing the egalitarian position. Not to mention the fact his channel is full of typical faux-melodrama and faux-outrage typical of leftists.
Oh, and he shows a high degree of affinity for novelty as a concept in art and music. Neophilia is something that generally correlates with leftist mentality and simpleton understanding of art.
@addendum044 Uuh. Athens tries to characterize me. Scaaary. Back to 4chon, and whine some more there. It's fun to see how you are paranoid about me supposedly posting there.
Your entire playlist is one long, elongated leftarded whine. How someone who shrieks and screams about how beastly his ideological opponents are, invoking Godwin every ten seconds can accuse others of 'whining' is laughable. Do you compartmentalize this hypocrisy or are you just stupid? I'm going to hedge my bets on the latter.
Quick, go and make another emotionally charged, passive aggressive video slurring your ideological enemies (poorly), maybe one of them will watch it in the next 10 years and be mildly offended!
By the way, take a look at your 'Piss Christ' video, I don't think I've ever seen anything more passive aggressive and emotionally charged in my life, hahaha. Are you sure you've not been taking estrogen again soccy?
@meawhiterabbit She is Romanian, that land lacks Jews thanks to the Romanian Iron Guard. An antisemitic patriotic group. That does not however mean they are not victim to propaganda from liberal judeo-America. In Romania they also do not suffer from much "diversity". People that have had experience with non-whites(especially blacks) would more likely be race realist. If ZOMGits would live in South Africa for a she would learn the truth.
@meawhiterabbit She is Romanian, that land lacks Jews thanks to the Romanian Iron Guard. An antisemitic patriotic group. That does not however mean they are not victim to propaganda from liberal judeo-America. In Romania they also do not suffer from much "diversity". People that have had experience with non-whites(especially blacks) would more likely be race realist. If ZOMGits would live in South Africa for a she would learn the truth.
@Jiggaburt If they did thake a course on genetics or evolution or biology, it would have to have a cultural marxist perspective, just like everything else in current academia.
"Saying that humans would "not give a shit if bears went extinct, if we could interbreed with bears to produce more bears" is an unverifiable claim." Then saying that humans are better off or less violent being with their own "races" is an unverifiable claim too, especially when there examples of intraracial violence. You can inferr such a claim because the endangered species humans tend to care about are other species we can't breed with and other ethnic groups we can easily breed with.
She ALSO said that she was perfectly fine if the planet suddenly had all northern europeans and no other populations. You played only a portion of the clip intentionally .Oh , your comment was a bad analogy. Humans would not give a shit if bears went extinct if we could interbreed with bears to reproduce more bears to but we can interbreed with other human beings to produce more other human beings. Plus, thats a strawman because zomg never said she cared about bears
@Pentazoid111 No. Regardless of what race Criss chose to mention as the sole survivng race, it matters not. She not only contradicted herself by arguing in support of human diversity, while in her next breath stating that she would not care if only a single race were to succeed the others, but she also acknowledged the existence of races when it supported her argument, while arguing that race is a social construction.
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implioicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implioicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
cont;d she never said that their were racial differences between "races" in terms of behavior and intelligence like many of you white nationalists/race realists advocate. There is evidence to support her claims about the physical differences between populations, but their is no evidence to support your claims that their are innate differences between populations in behavior and intelligence.
@Pentazoid111 "but their is no evidence to support your claims that their are innate differences between populations in behavior and intelligence."
There's isn't? Then what's this 60-page review paper reviewing?: psychology. uwo. ca/faculty/rushton_pubs. htm
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
@Pentazoid111 Once the white race is gone it will be gone like Neanderthal man. Neanderthal man was a separate species but Homosapiens were still able to interbreed. All non africans have neanderthal DNA. Everybody else is not black.
@Bossk333 And about this Vine Street thing, if people act like jerks, they get what's coming to them anyway, for example lower real estate prices are a bitch aren't they? :) Who wants to live next to criminals and bigots?
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
@Bossk333 It's too bad you don't realize you're contradicting yourself. You support segregation: "Segregation is truly the only way to overcome racism."
Segregation IS discrimination by definition, I'm sorry to say, it won't solve anything, it will only strengthen irrational tribal bondage and divide the people. We'll be set back hundreds of years by this.
Interracial personal relationships can work just fine if neither party is indoctrinated with the dogma of tribalism.
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
@Bossk333 Rrrright, because Vine Street = the entire black race... /facepalm
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
@Bossk333 And you have the right to defend yourself against that person, I don't see the contradiction here.
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
@Bossk333 No, ceasing to be racist is the only way to overcome racism. :)
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
@LibertarianRealist So you would support segregation for the sake of "aesthetics"? LOL
Well at the end of the day you're free to select your spouse based on whatever criteria you want (even if it's shallow "I IS ONLY DATE WHITES HERPADERP!"). Just don't expect anyone else to and we won't have a problem.
DogmasDemise 4 weeks ago
cunt
TheMrgoku1985 1 month ago
Theres a bit of a problem with your comparison of wanting to save species from extinction and lack of care about preserving races.
As you say races are evolutionary and their merging in to one is perfectly natural and darwinian. Saving species from extinction is not saving them from evolving in to a new species it is saving them from total extinction.
You are very dishonest here.
srspower 2 months ago
When you focus on meaningless details it sure does make black people seem so much different to justify your view of a lower evolutionary state. But when you contrast it with the similarities such a view dissolves. Which is why someone like you is considered racist by mainstream culture: You seek justifications for your presumption of the inferiority of black people.
Aeimos 3 months ago
she`s romanian and believe me a romanian that romanians don`t know much about that anti-european liberal crap going on in western Europe and USA
there aren't to many black people in Romania anyway
we had one named Chauncey Hardy but i don`t know what happened to him
FriendlyCroock 3 months ago
My own belief is that the different racial groups within humanity came into being at a VERY early stage of human history and that they were the consequence of divine decree. True, this is not a strictly 'scientific' perspective but the inability of science to cope with the historical and cultural realities of racial difference only reveals the intense limitations of science.
atticana 4 months ago
It is very striking that the various races of mankind have apparently popped into existence fully formed, or at least with no clear line of ancestral development. There is not a scrap of evidence in the human fossil record, such as it is, to show the emergence over long periods of different racial groups. For such diversification to have taken place, for example from negroes to nordics would have required innumerable 'intermediate types'. The meagre human fossil record contains none.
atticana 4 months ago
Also, the genetic variation inside Africa is so huge that defining such a thing as a Negroid race is stupid. You would end up with multiple races in Africa if it was a hardcoded observable "biological" entity.
But you probably dont care about variation in Africa. It is conceptually easier to consider them all the same.How is race NOT A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT when it BASED ON INDIVIDUAL PERCEPTION? What might be black and white to you might be grey to others.
iobroful 4 months ago
So ok lets say its biological.... then please list/map out the different "races" for me?... since they are apparently so taxonomically significant that they need their own grouping. And if you cant come up with more than 4 human races, then wow, planet earth must be an environmentally diverse place.
Caucasians are being hung by Russians based on their perceived ethnicity as we speak. How ironic huh? I guess I would have to be white to see the difference between them.
Racism is bad, period!
iobroful 4 months ago
@chiefkyle1 Re: social construct. I mean, the race thing was given credibility during the time when there were a shitload of white slaves too. And it became obvious among both blacks and whites that the handful of rich were fucking everybody over. Poor whites/blacks were pretty close friends actually. This was the threat to the establishment that began the whole mess. Whites hit easy street overnight, and were fed the propaganda about being better naturally to divide the poor by race. savvy?
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
@chiefkyle1 The PROBLEM starts when the term race, (which denotes specific genetic difference beyond those of any humans) starts being used to classify people genetically in relation to their current position within society. Blacks for example, are an oppressed people, who to this day are judged in a race where they had their shoelaces tied, werent given a map, and not offered much food or water so to speak to sustain them during the race. Now its fair to point and say "im smarter?"
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
@chiefkyle1 Do you think the current system caters to minorities? Honestly? And Minorities is not a term coined to denote race, but numerical aspects of a population. Anyways, there in no denial that there are different people all through the world. Its not the elephant in the room you make it out to be. Irish people with red hair and freckles vs an italian with jet black hair for example: You would not seperate them by "race" but im guessing you would go with "nationality" right? Both "white"?
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL I think the elephant in the room is actually the very nature of the black and white relationship. As its proven that the relationship is symbiotic. In some ways i do agree with classifications, but id say its best to think of people in terms of nations. The black nation/white nation etc. Then its kinda simple to see that "minorities" as in blacks problems stem from a homeland that is now foreign, and a home they built in slavery, but werent welcomed in as free people. right?
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
Comment removed
deltaknightshahmehri 4 months ago
@chiefkyle1 What you call it is up to you, im just saying its hard to call bullshit on science. Of course there are differences in species of dogs, however i think those differences are apparent to science as well. An arguement from ignorance is to toss science out the window and give scientific value to self identification. Mind you, the bulk of all this "intellectual" talk of race differences comes from a nation with test scores that point to retardation when compared to other nations. hmm
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
@chiefkyle1 As has been proven and not yet contested " if there is a genetic marker for race, it has not been found" so until otherwise, races as more than self defined states, do not exist. Everything people would normally use to define race are all found within the same "races" and with greater variations. Its simple science. We would need something genetic, specific to each type of "race" in order to assert that race outside a social classification actually exists. thats all.
ThisPageStaysREAL 4 months ago
ZOMGitscriss is right about religion and i like her videos about religion -and espesially creationism.
But not about race. Biologists don't use the term "race" because it's politically incorrect -but that doesn't mean that races don't exist.
4thOfAugust1936 5 months ago
@chiefkyle1 the things you are talking about, like Skull shape, brain cavity size etc.. you do know that those things cant be used to determine "a race" as you claim right? if some arkane machine just ripped a brain out of a skull and just weighed them.. we wouldnt be able to ID who was who based on weight..
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chiefkyle1 No i dont agree because there are two schools of theory on brain size, and the one most logical is the one that in general would point size not being a factor among humans, as evident in male and female brains being of differentaverage sizes, but no links shown to support anything on the topic. There is also the theory that brain size in relation to body size plays a big role in abilities. but who knows. Our African ancestors brains were much smaller? How much would you say?
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@chiefkyle1 No i dont agree because there are two schools of theory on brain size, and the one most logical is the one that in general would point size not being a factor among humans, as evident in male and female brains being of differentaverage sizes, but no links shown to support anything on the topic. There is also the theory that brain size in relation to body size plays a big role in abilities. but who knows. Our African ancestors brains were much smaller? How much would you say?
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@chiefkyle1 That statement requires those pesky genetic markers for race which have thusfar been able to elude the field. It also makes a huge unsupported leap in stating that what a society considers valuable and its goal to secure that value are things that A. spawn genetic advancement, or B. its opposite. And can you provide me with an example of how a deduction made without proper context can be presented as common sense? Why not just, rough speculation for example?
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
Why do all conservatives insist on fooling themselves constantly? I dont really get it. Im sure almost every moron who likes to just chop a population in half using libs/cons has HAD to had thought,..."what if its a scam?" I think the difference between the 2 groups boils down to 1 key belief. One group HONESTLY believes that poor people are the reason they haven't been able to flourish lol. Or e.g. "If the poor were gone, 70% vs. 1% would hold the 95% of the wealth.
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@chiefkyle1 Its people like you, that are usually missing a few gigs in the critical thinking department. You have the base model brain, and sadly nature didn't select you for a spin through the oprtions room on the house. People like you, just need a snapshot of something to send your "lil' mind that thought it could" into motion. "Naturally" is a dangerous word when used by an idiot. Let me then ask, Are the Irish naturally more violent than the British? or Sunni vs. Sheia? Whats nature say?
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
Despite being a libtard ZOMGitsCriss gives me a monstrous erection.
SAEuropeanPatriot 5 months ago
How can we all be Africans if Africans are a social construct? It seems that Africans are the only ones who are allowed to have a race. LOL!
BootboyJohnny 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Logicalpoots Better yet, say I couldn't care if everyone was gentile.
They're not only anti-white, but against every gentile race.
OldSchopenhauer 5 months ago
@Logicalpoots Better yet, say I couldn't care if everyone was gentile.
They're not only anti-white, but against every gentile race.
OldSchopenhauer 5 months ago
ZOMGitsCriss is sexy. We have to consider this fact
AlvinSawdust 5 months ago
@AlvinSawdust not when you consider her air-headed hatred of her own race in the embrace of "diversity"
hailholyghost 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She's a Romanian Gypsy, she's not white.
konstantineb 5 months ago
She's a Romanian Gypsy, she's not white.
konstantineb 5 months ago
She's a Romanian Gypsy, she's not white.
konstantineb 5 months ago
Well, we are mostly from a group that left Africa, but Africans mixed with an older group, and Eurasians mixed with Neandertals and Denisovans to varying extents. Some anthropologists like, Dr. Jonathan Hawks, speculate that the Denisovans could be Homo erectus. If that is true then Homo erectus was a race of human. Some new evidence suggests that Homo erectus originated in Southern Europe around Georgia before coming to Africa. Therefore, we might all be Europeans.
n00ffensebut 5 months ago 3
Excellent video.
CitizenOccidens 5 months ago
I'm going to post a video soon going a bit more in depth on the "We are all Africans" thing since that slogan is plaguing my video comments. Just so you know, I'm not totally stealing your idea. Not entirely :)
HeyRuka 5 months ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
everything is a social contruct now a days.
hilletehnoob 5 months ago
also, if a "race" of nordic ppl went extinct it would be from a mass event you tool! Have you NO idea what your speaking about or what? If for example, ZOMGcriss had a child with a spanish guy and that child if male, knocked up a japanese woman for example, the child would still be outed via DNA testing. So just because the blond hair is gone, says NOTHING about a race being extinct! hahaha.. i can see why you feel Ruka is a fountain of knowledge. yikes!
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
Comment removed
6GreatDaneLover6 5 months ago in playlist Още видеоклипове от LibertarianRealist
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThisPageStaysREAL
You are not part from my race.
You are Congoid/Negroid.
Congoids hate jews, "zionists", see nazis everywhere and Believe in 9/11 Truth ideas
This is how the Congoid mind react
6GreatDaneLover6 5 months ago
@6GreatDaneLover6 Wow.. thats quite the scientific classification system you have there knucklehead..
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
9/11 Truther? Check.
Supporter of Terrorist attacks against Israel? yes sir.
Believer in Inter-National Jewish Masonic Satanic Conspiracy? Ooo, yeah
Seeing Nazis, Reptilians and Jewish Freemasons everywhere? Yup
The Conclusion?
This man is part from the Negroid Race.
6GreatDaneLover6 5 months ago
@6GreatDaneLover6 haha, you know David Duke also strongly believes in every one of the hack viewpoints you just vomited up...moron. Im no fan of ol' Doc Dookie but i'll give him credit on those excerpts of his twisted logic. The rest can go into the dumpster. By the way, international is just one word. I dont see any reptilians outside of the pet stores, and re: the Nazis vs. Jewish Freemasons... would i see 1 group or the other, or both? 911 truther? 100% they found themite, lots. Ur turn :)
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6GreatDaneLover6 haha, you know David Duke also strongly believes in every one of the hack viewpoints you just vomited up...moron. Im no fan of ol' Doc Dookie but i'll give him credit on those excerpts of his twisted logic. The rest can go into the dumpster. By the way, international is just one word. I dont see any reptilians outside of the pet stores, and re: the Nazis vs. Jewish Freemasons... would i see 1 group or the other, or both? 911 truther? 100 % they found themite, lots. Ur turn :)
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
racially he's chinese?? hahaha... derr derr derrrrr... how about saying" the child looks like he's from china?" If a white person claimed African, he could BE from Africa. And what does being jailed for lying on a form have to do with the "race" the person lied about being?? haha thats a crime example, not an argument about the penalty for saying you're black... moron! hahaha
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
8:14 Why are you using diagrams from the 1930's? The chimpanzee skull looks more like the European skull than the African does! Don't be TOO retrogressive now...people might not trust you haha
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@TemporalDissonance Yes, I thought the stark skull depictions were kind of amusing, too.
LibertarianRealist 5 months ago
The shirt is equivocal to 'the layman on the street'. However, the shirt isn't meant to be taken literally in society at large. You take the statement out of context and use its implications in a literal sense. If you were scientifically literate, then you would have marvelled at such a statement or even found it witty. Only people who don't like to be associated with 'Africans' or have a opposing fixed veiw on their roots would find the shirt irritating or offensive...
hallowbe 5 months ago
What is amusing to me is that those leftists who wax lyrical about the joys of racial diversity are the very same people who splutter with indignation at any suggestion that all of this diversity might be accompanied by certain racial differences.
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana
Don't forget:
If you believe racial differences are biological, you're a racist.
And if you believe sexual orientation is not biological, you're a homophobe.
blackacidlizzard 5 months ago
@atticana ZomgitsCriss doesn't prefer racial diversity. She doesn't have a preference...but you do. And I haven't seen proof for any difference in intelligence.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@TemporalDissonance 'And I haven't seen proof for any difference in intelligence.' Oh really? Well my dear fellow, just look at Africa, then look at Europe. Need more proof?
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana You do know that all civilizations fluctuate in sophistication. If genetics determined the development of a region, then this would not be the case...evolution doesn't happen fast enough to influence the exchange of resources, which is all it come down to.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@TemporalDissonance LOL witha vengeance! So please my good sir, tell me when Africa went through its sophisticated period? Or must we wait a bit longer for the period of African sophistication? I'll try not to hold my breath!!!
atticana 5 months ago
1/2 @atticana Why are you focusing on Africans? I'm not saying that all areas of the world achieve the same amount of success in any given time. I'm saying that it is the climate and availability of resources that determines sophistication. You chose Africa because it has a terrible climate and availability of resources, and...oh look, they're underdeveloped.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@TemporalDissonance Forgive me, but your ignorance is almost cosmic in its proportions. Africa is very rich in resources and it has a very good climate for humans to live in. Otherwise why would multinational companies and the Chinese be so anxious to get involved with Africa? Personally I would follow Harold MacMillan's advice concerning the Dark Continent...build a great wall around it and peek in every thousand years or so to see if there's any sign of civilisation emerging.
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana My ignorance? I can't even comment on your hyperbole about building a wall. Africa is lacking in fresh water, which crucial to having a food surplus...which is crucial to a developing as a region. There's a huge disparity between fresh water in sub-saharan africa, and in other areas of the world.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@atticana My ignorance? I can't even comment on your hyperbole about building a wall. Africa is lacking in fresh water, which crucial to having a food surplus...which is crucial to a developing as a region. There's a huge disparity between fresh water in sub-saharan africa, and in other areas of the world.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@TemporalDissonance 2/2 There's always going to be a correlation between availability of resources, and genetic history without immigration, but when the people do leave, they're held back by people who hyperfocus on race, and associate them with the people who are still stuck in an underdeveloped area.
TemporalDissonance 5 months ago
@atticana lol, did you know that immigrants from Africa coming to both Europe and America to further study average higher test scores and grades than their fellow students?
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL Aha! So THAT explains why Africa is such a rip-roaring success story!!!
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana The state of Africa has little to do with the intelligence or lack of in some cases. Africa is a textboox example of what happens to a mineral rich nation when Europeans get news of it. Africa today is the result of European control of African assets, who exclude the people of Africa from their own game. Thats why you hear about those killings of white south africans etc. Btw, I dont think you or even I as an American have the right to point to another place in mockery. look @ the US
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL TRANSLATION: 'I am a white liberal who thinks that all of Africa's problems are caused by the white man.' Well, that lets Robert Mugabe off the hook!!! And Julius Malema too if he ever becomes leader of South Africa. (the next Robert Mugabe?)
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana Actually yes, most all Africas problems were created by, or stem from white men. Now hear this, that DOES NOT MEAN YOU, just cause it was Europeans and whites that caused many of the worlds problems, does that mean you are to blame? Of course not man. But this whole defy and deny act is just foolish. Being "white" and being one of the so called "white man" are very different. Stop making excuses for shit you didn't do, and start trying to repair the damage that was done man.
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL I don't deny that the white man has got a lot to answer for. But the best way of resolving these problems is for the white and black races to be kept as separate as possible and for Africa to be left to its own devices. After all, if what you say is true, then a withdrawal from Africa by the white man would solve most of Africa's problems!!!
atticana 5 months ago
@atticana Do me a favor and disregard what temporal said, just cause its not based in any reality. I know he means well, but yea.. Anyways, you are correct about the seperation, but here again he, (not you dude) the "white man"rears his head to screw us both over. See, Africa is probably the most mineral and resource rich continent on earth, the problem is "the man" currently has control of most of it, and has no intention of sharing with africans..or any hard working whites for that matter.
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@atticana You need to realise how the game is played. Japan prior to recent events, was a solid 2nd in terms of wealth. But it has NO resources of its own. Similar to both Europe, and the US actually. I take it you know we arent in these conflicts to liberate shit, maybe liberate some resources from the rightful owner. Now, its done thru destablization, no mystery. Then as in Africas case, the situation is pointed at, with no context. So a logical mind can easily think "wow..what fuckups"
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL
Japan's economy is export oriented towards electronics and auto-industry. They were able to achieve success through mercantile economic policies. Also realize Japan is a social-democracy. Before the disaster Japan lost its #2 status. The disaster Japan has now is not the cause of Japan losing its economic position. A strong yen is hurting Japan. Japan has had two decades of the lost decade. Africa is actually about to begin an economic boom within the next few decades
lordblazer 5 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL
Also Japan had large deposits of coal (still do), Anyway Japan is probably the only limited resource country that isn't exploiting through imperialism (yea they pay to import most of their most needed supplies thus Japan is quite an expensive country to live in take it form me I was a student in Japan. tough times even Ramen cannot save you XD)
lordblazer 5 months ago
@atticana The coup de gras is how that same white man who has a WHOLE lot to answer for, has planted the idea that you to are guilty by association ( or artificial concepts of race?) . This is what causes the tension, same way the FED, has racked up that wild debt, and its pawned off as "our national debt" its complete bullshit. There are no additional white handouts beyond those given currently, as a "1st class citizen". Society is made to accomodate whites, but not increase the crumb rations.
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
@atticana In fact, is it so hard to believe? Dont tell me you are one of the people who thinks America is some beacon of knowledge or an example of intelligence in motion lol. The interesting thing is, (to me anyway) how all you racists or "realists" talk about blacks having lower IQs than whites, while the only IQ test you have ever taken was on facebook, and you speak from a position thats laughed at by every other industrial nation on earth. To top it off, you argue logic with emotion lol.
ThisPageStaysREAL 5 months ago
Excellent video and I feel the same conclusion about HeyRuka now. Judge people by their actions as it were.
Crypto-Jews are nothing new (Iberian history in particular) and with disastrous results, but she must be honoured. It takes guts to do what HeyRuka has done.
MarkMuses 5 months ago
I say this all the time. If race doesn't exist then there are an awful lot of people who need to be released from prison and given some sort of compensation for being convicted of a hate crime that could not physically possibly have been committed.
14ByTheSword 5 months ago
Most people only subscribe to ZOMG because of her looks. I thought all atheist understood evolution but she doesn't otherwise she would know race is real.
DroolingThroughLife 5 months ago
However, its zombizgritz......personal opinion....and i dont think you have to make a video in response to her video.
mildpace 5 months ago
i almost gave thumbs down to this video....when i heard the ending i decided to give it thumbs up.
i dont think there is any racial supremacy, i believing in all races living together in one community, as in india or america....but some people who force racial mixing are even worse.
i mean ethicnity....when i say race.
mildpace 5 months ago
@ReliableAndValid
Yes, I think Pinker is disinformation myself too. There's a reason Harvard has elevated him recently and my own personal opinion is that he serves the purpose of spinning the emerging evidence (particularly GWAS evidence) of human/racial inequality into a left-liberal narrative. In effect Pinker is very much part of the mainstream, and accepts mainstream liberalism - He's useful for the status quo as a result, because they've learned they can no longer promulgate tabula rasa.
addendum044 5 months ago
@Hereditarian
Socrates856 primary reasoning for his faith is an objection to Principal Component Analysis as a way of clustering racial groups, it's a sort of advanced form of race denial, roughly analagous to the sorts of very nice sounding chaff ID proponents throw up (though ID proponents are generally more academically honest than race deniers). I can go into more detail about mathematically illiterate PCA denial if you'd like, it follows a fairly linear pattern.
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Wow, quite the liar you are.
socrates856 5 months ago
Comment removed
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Haha, delete your own comment realizing that you admitted your lie:
"I'm not a liar, you've dug up a few papers criticizing PCA and you've made it a mainstay of your arguments. I doubt you even realize why it's necessary. The whole point is that those ranges do exist, but can only be properly understood with a non-redundant dataset."
The lie is that you had no clue before about PCA yet pretended that you did and I exposed it. And given your paragraph above, you still have no clue.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856
My second comment more or less corresponds in meaning to the first one, I just disliked the wording of the first. This is hardly something to trumpet as a victory.
Anyway, I'm well aware of what PCA is - Namely a method by which heterogeneous swarms of data are transferred (by orthogonal transformation) onto two or more eigenvectors. Now admittedly my mathematics isn't perfect, but I'm aware of why this procedure is necessary and its importance. You evidently, are not.
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Evidently you couldn't formulate my position if your life depended on it.
Your PCA description isn't bad for someone who really doesn't understand it. So tell me. What dictates the number of eigenvectors? Is that dictated by the data? Or is that dictated by the researcher? And what is the final step after having gotten the eigen-decomposition to actually get what one would call principal components. What makes them "principal"?
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856
Eigenvectors are calculated using eigenvalues, And the final stage is the conversion into standard scores followed by the projection of that data, as for what makes it principal, it's because they're the principal components that define differences between racial groups (after eliminating the variables that contribute nothing to the data).
The whole point is that those ranges do exist, but can only be properly understood with a non-redundant dataset. But please, whine more :)
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Nice googling. Not quite right, but I like that you at least try to get it right. It certainly is not any projection that makes an eigenvector principal. "Principal" has nothing to do with projection. Components are indeed eigenvector/value pairs. But what makes them principal is the eigenvalue. So what do we do with eigenvalues to complete the PCA? You'll have to google more to figure out why that is true.
socrates856 5 months ago
@addendum044 Still petty as always.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856
Care to explain, what, if anything I'm lying about? In before the same hackneyed old arguments you've been trotting out on a hundred different videos for years.
addendum044 5 months ago
@Hereditarian Let me put it like this: Rushton never has and never will publish this graph in this form in any peer reviewed publication. And there are multiple reasons for this, only a few of which I have given in the video.
That you don't think it's doctored mostly means that you do not know what the standards in academia is for faithful representations of graphs.
socrates856 5 months ago
@ReliableAndValid Interesting. So he rejects race and I.Q. correlation?
UcanbeGOD 5 months ago
@flyingseapigeon
HannibalBarca lost it once he pulled out the "Spartan-Nazi plot to take over the government conspiracy theory" as his disturbingly funny "end game".
QuantumMaths 5 months ago
I can't even argue with these Neo-Rousseau "Reality Deniers" anymore.
I'm glad you can set them straight without wanting to smash thick pc glazed skulls in, LiberatrianRealist :)
FreiLiegnitz 5 months ago
lol, erections.
TinkerBellCurves 5 months ago
She's committed to getting the truth out? She misquotes her sources on multiple counts, uses the doctored graph from Rushton etc. In fact she cites sources that she clearly hasn't read, because she couldn't possibly saying what she is saying if she had read them.
Incidentally she makes exactly the same misquotations as MrHerrIQ. I guess errors propagate unchecked.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856 You again. Can you be more specific?
HeyRuka 5 months ago
@HeyRuka Sure. You claimed that approval by anthropologists of race is rising when the very papers you cite (Lieberman specifically) documents the opposite. The numbers you cite are wrong and on all counts too high. The number of Europe is actually just Poland which is the extreme outlier, the European number is substantially lower. You use the graph from Rushton's booklet that I documented is doctored.
May well be more. It's obvious that many of the sources you cite you haven't read in full.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856 Didn't we discuss this already before? In the comments of my last vid?
HeyRuka 5 months ago
@HeyRuka Well not really. Of all these points you have half-acknowledge but brushed aside one. And that's the Polish vs European point. The rest? I don't recall you having acknowledged. There are no corrections to your video anywhere and frankly I have seen no evidence at all that you have in any way acted as if you acknowledge any of these points, nor even checked for them.
Basically you have a video up with a number of pieces of misinformation. And that doesn't even touch the politics.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856 That's why I remember you. Pretty sure we talked about this. I included several European studies in my sources, not just the Polish study. None of them contradict my results. If I didn't include the studies I will go back and put them in. Bottom line, there is no consensus. As for the graph, where are you getting your info? I've read the books and critiques and critiques of critiques and I'm familiar with everything I sourced. I'm confident in my presentation.
HeyRuka 5 months ago
@HeyRuka Sorry, but don't BS. You offer inline citations. Those are the sources that are supposed to support your claims. They do not. The additional sources too do not support your claims. As for Rushton's doctored graph, I have a video up that explains why I claim it's doctored. It also demonstrates that FE hasn't read original sources incidentally, and misrepresents the study.
So surely, that is no lack of confidence. I would argue that's a big part of the problem.
socrates856 5 months ago
@HeyRuka
It's amusing how he consistently claims he has no political axe to grind, yet he's on these videos morning, noon and night pushing the egalitarian position. Not to mention the fact his channel is full of typical faux-melodrama and faux-outrage typical of leftists.
Oh, and he shows a high degree of affinity for novelty as a concept in art and music. Neophilia is something that generally correlates with leftist mentality and simpleton understanding of art.
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Uuh. Athens tries to characterize me. Scaaary. Back to 4chon, and whine some more there. It's fun to see how you are paranoid about me supposedly posting there.
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856
>whine
Your entire playlist is one long, elongated leftarded whine. How someone who shrieks and screams about how beastly his ideological opponents are, invoking Godwin every ten seconds can accuse others of 'whining' is laughable. Do you compartmentalize this hypocrisy or are you just stupid? I'm going to hedge my bets on the latter.
addendum044 5 months ago
Comment removed
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044 Fast, go warn your samefags about it, else the JIDF wins!
socrates856 5 months ago
@socrates856
Quick, go and make another emotionally charged, passive aggressive video slurring your ideological enemies (poorly), maybe one of them will watch it in the next 10 years and be mildly offended!
addendum044 5 months ago
@addendum044
By the way, take a look at your 'Piss Christ' video, I don't think I've ever seen anything more passive aggressive and emotionally charged in my life, hahaha. Are you sure you've not been taking estrogen again soccy?
addendum044 5 months ago
@ReliableAndValid Social cohesion?
UcanbeGOD 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@meawhiterabbit She is Romanian, that land lacks Jews thanks to the Romanian Iron Guard. An antisemitic patriotic group. That does not however mean they are not victim to propaganda from liberal judeo-America. In Romania they also do not suffer from much "diversity". People that have had experience with non-whites(especially blacks) would more likely be race realist. If ZOMGits would live in South Africa for a she would learn the truth.
SAEuropeanPatriot 5 months ago
@meawhiterabbit She is Romanian, that land lacks Jews thanks to the Romanian Iron Guard. An antisemitic patriotic group. That does not however mean they are not victim to propaganda from liberal judeo-America. In Romania they also do not suffer from much "diversity". People that have had experience with non-whites(especially blacks) would more likely be race realist. If ZOMGits would live in South Africa for a she would learn the truth.
SAEuropeanPatriot 5 months ago
ZOMGits is stupid. She denies the truth.
ginfrix 5 months ago 33
@ginfrix I think she is a zionist agent, she always talks harshly about muslims but never about Jews.
Is that bleach fooling anyone?
lostwisdom100 5 months ago
We are all amphibians.
ZOMGitsDouchebag 5 months ago
@Jiggaburt If they did thake a course on genetics or evolution or biology, it would have to have a cultural marxist perspective, just like everything else in current academia.
j1mmyZeta 5 months ago
nice explanation.
MensRifleAssociation 5 months ago
This is why women should not be allowed to talk or have opinions. They come up with shitty ones.
darklord220 5 months ago
@darklord220 Sammich videos > opinion videos.
HeyRuka 5 months ago
Have you see MrHerrIQ's series "racism is natural"?
PoweredByMagnets 5 months ago
I think it's more accurate to say that modern day Africans and all other races are descendants from early human Africans.
EliteKiller07 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EliteKiller07 Nope all nonblacks have neanderthal DNA. All nonblacks are mixes.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
"Saying that humans would "not give a shit if bears went extinct, if we could interbreed with bears to produce more bears" is an unverifiable claim." Then saying that humans are better off or less violent being with their own "races" is an unverifiable claim too, especially when there examples of intraracial violence. You can inferr such a claim because the endangered species humans tend to care about are other species we can't breed with and other ethnic groups we can easily breed with.
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
Have you ever seen any of the theories against the 'out of Africa' theory?
return135 5 months ago
She ALSO said that she was perfectly fine if the planet suddenly had all northern europeans and no other populations. You played only a portion of the clip intentionally .Oh , your comment was a bad analogy. Humans would not give a shit if bears went extinct if we could interbreed with bears to reproduce more bears to but we can interbreed with other human beings to produce more other human beings. Plus, thats a strawman because zomg never said she cared about bears
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
@Pentazoid111 No. Regardless of what race Criss chose to mention as the sole survivng race, it matters not. She not only contradicted herself by arguing in support of human diversity, while in her next breath stating that she would not care if only a single race were to succeed the others, but she also acknowledged the existence of races when it supported her argument, while arguing that race is a social construction.
HeyRuka 5 months ago 2
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implioicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implioicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
I have listened to her videos on these topics numerous times and I have not heard her cay that she supports human diversity for the sake of our superficial differences. She clearly stated she is against forced seperation that many white nationalist/race realists explicitly and implicitly are advocating, including yourself because you advocate white nationalism. She acknowledges that their are physical and very few medical differences between "races" cont'd
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
cont;d she never said that their were racial differences between "races" in terms of behavior and intelligence like many of you white nationalists/race realists advocate. There is evidence to support her claims about the physical differences between populations, but their is no evidence to support your claims that their are innate differences between populations in behavior and intelligence.
Pentazoid111 5 months ago
@Pentazoid111 "but their is no evidence to support your claims that their are innate differences between populations in behavior and intelligence."
There's isn't? Then what's this 60-page review paper reviewing?: psychology. uwo. ca/faculty/rushton_pubs. htm
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
hitssquad 5 months ago
@hitssquad Maybe, Rushton and them was racist, . . .
phillipgaley 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pentazoid111 Once the white race is gone it will be gone like Neanderthal man. Neanderthal man was a separate species but Homosapiens were still able to interbreed. All non africans have neanderthal DNA. Everybody else is not black.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
How Many Democrats are ready to accept their brothers in humanity - Republicans?
After all... it's all social construct?
Race is Biological construct..
Religion and Politics are Social Construcs.
If White realize that Left/Right and Religions are BULLSHIT... Then 4 Reich will start.
DanishGreatDane 5 months ago 22
@DanishGreatDane You're a delusional bigot. There's a reason why the third reich was demolished...go figure.
hallowbe 5 months ago
@hallowbe
"Bigot" it's like being called "BURN THIS WITCH!"
;)
DanishGreatDane 5 months ago
@DanishGreatDane You must be stricken with euphoria...
hallowbe 5 months ago