HIV Positive Man Tests Negative 8 Years Later

[4165mc]

so what. this proves nothing other than that he was given the wrong test result; that could've been caused by anything. to extrapolate from one incident that "therefore HIV does not exist" proves only that there are ppl who like to make spurious and fantastical conclusions on very little "evidence".

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@4165mc The reason WHY the so-called "hiv" antibody tests have no Gold Standard is because NOBODY including the "discoverer" AND test kit patent holder has ever found even one "hiv" in an aids patient in order to validate them scientifically.

I have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic. They ADMIT their products are UNstandardized and they make no claims that their products can make a SPECIFIC diagnosis or what the significance of reaction is.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@4165mc How do you tell the difference btw a "false+" and a "true+"? A reaction looks exactly the same on the test no matter what causes it. It might just be from pregnancy or herpes.

[4165mc]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny I have no idea. I am not a medical professional, hiv expert or an epidemiologist nor am I in possession of all the facts of this case. None of us are and that is why I say, we can't jump to any conclusions based on a screengrab of a news story.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@4165mc The scientists in my featured video are. Mullis won the Nobel Prize for the PCR test and Richards worked on the original "hiv" antibody tests. I also have the disclaimers to the test kits on my channel under the profile pic.

It was a trick question though....the answer is...without a gold standard it is IMPOSSIBLE to tell the difference

[MsJayAlexis]

@4165mc THANK YOU!

[revelations171]

You don't ACTUALLY have AIDS or HIV people, it's all in your minds like they want you to think with paperwork.

[favouritetwo]

The test isn't accurate. The drugs are killing people. They lied to you. Wake up.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google...More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

[wowsdrawkcab]

Did he later test low in T-cells? LOTS to be answered before making such suppositions.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@wowsdrawkcab Who cares about tcell counts? ONLY the US bothers to count them. You still need to cough up the primary peer reviewed papers where these proteins.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160....were shown to belong to a unique viral entity and it was linked to immune problems.

Title Date and Journal. You already know that because I've been asking you for several months now and the dissidents have been asking fo decades.

[wowsdrawkcab]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny

Nice try but not really what I commented on try again.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@wowsdrawkcab Your comment was irrelevant. Tcell counts mean nothing.

[wowsdrawkcab]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny

Yep nothing... apart from defining immunodeficiency... just stop.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@wowsdrawkcab tcell count only "defines" immunodeficiency in the US and the only reason anyone does it here is because of Gallo's virus of mass destrucion theory of immune suppression.

So NAME the primary peer reviewed papers which support his theory. Title Date and Journal

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@wowsdrawkcab Google....A Cure for US AIDS – Travel to Canada

" In 1993, the United States Health Authorities created a new category of AIDS, comprising but two cofactors: The combination of a person being; 1) “HIV–antibody +,” and 2) Having a low white blood cell count below an arbitrary threshhold (a threshhold that many completely healthy people, including superb athletes, would fail, in part because white blood cells normally reside in interstitial tissue and not in the bloodstream)..."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

CONT..."All other western nations: Canada, and European countries, Australia, etc., refused to adopt the unique U.S. AIDS definition that depends on low white blood cell counts. Since 1995, with the most risky anti–HIV drugs steadily discarded, these countries have had AIDS mortality falling steadily toward zero (For instance, Germany with 81 million people had but 73 AIDS deaths in 2007, echoing Canada). ..."

[srper2]

Cognitive dissonance is a wonderful thing for people who cannot face the truth. Aids is here to stay, it is here to reduce the human population to a sustainable number. The fact that you have felt the need to be "tested" to find out what is making you sick indicates that you ARE sick. The more people who deny they have the virus, the faster it spreads and the higher chance Earths ecosystem has of surviving. GO for it....

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@srper2 Google....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDS EPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT

"“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on Sunday, June 8, 2008.....

No, really. But take it from someone you trust, Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”

[amorhombre]

People who bash the "AIDS Denialists" are people who are NOT HIV positive who have NOT done their research and who do NOT want HIV cured or to go away. I say shut the fuck already! I was diagnosed in 2007 went on the crap meds and had no control of my life. Quit listening what the $cientific community is tell in you and look it up for yourself. You'll become and AIDS REALIST! it's the medications that are making people sick and keeping them sick! ALL people who have died were on meds!

[sweetsnackz]

It may be that the test came back neg when he was entering Greece is because different countries require different numbers of markers for someone to be considered HIV positive. As crazy as that sounds you may test positive on one country and neg in another. Dangerous stuff

[zander469]

This isnt the only case in the word either. This happens in Africa too where people get tested positive then negative. Also a case in the UK a man called Andrew Stimpson was poitive in 2002 then tested negative 14 months later. If you are "positive"- i would get a re-test.

[bluevidcam]

Yeah, Arguing is off topic. So why did he test negative? Was it a false positive to start off with or is he getting a false negative now. I was told false positives have occured but never false negatives. Has something to do with a protien count foulup (or some doctor told me that). I want to know about the doctor who purposly infected himself with a weakened HIV virus to test a vaccine. Anyone know about that case? And if taking cocktail meds long enough will you finally be cured?

[quidproquo2004]

"You study physics so you are biased because you are only getting one side of the story." What story are you talking about? Maybe you think I'm biased because I'm learning mainstream science and not filthy non-sense you find on the side of the road? Degrees don't mean the person is infallible. Throwing names at me is no more meaningful than quoting the bible. There is overwhelming evidence to support HIV as the cause of AIDS. So, take your cheers and shove it up your ass.

[quidproquo2004]

I did and I visited their website. There is nothing scientific here. They use vague expressions like "many biochemical scientists now question the hypothesis" and such. Also, their strength is in those who argue points based on belief and not on fact. "Some members believe there is no such entity as HIV". Are you fucking kidding me? This is hokum, bunk, and just total bullshit. For your own good you need to get your facts straight. The New England Journal of Medicine is peer-reviewed.

[elvuitton]

@quidproquo2004 talking about facts, show me the FACT that HIV was isolated! and please dont come up with some "evidence" bullshit that this could be "propably" HIV, as I allready received it from the Robert-Koch-Institute! go ahead, show me the FACT based on scientific!

[quidproquo2004]

If HIV is a hoax, then I'm a talking stack of pancakes.

[hivquestions]

nice to meet you aunt jemima - i'm mrs. butterworth and yes, the hiv theory is a hoax.

[quidproquo2004]

Okay, so you must be a virologist with notable publications. Can you direct me to publications of your groundbreaking research?

[quidproquo2004]

Because I could claim that I know the center of the moon is made of solid cheese. If you don't have the credentials, than it very likely means you have no scientifically verifiable evidence. All of those people clearly have an agenda and have allowed their bias to interfere with scientific reason.

[letitgothinkpositive]

we dont have to proof its a hoax.the hiv establishment has to proof their claims.since alot of people spended money for the good not for death

[kaneXtreme]

spended ?

[letitgothinkpositive]

what did i say my comment is gone

[Nousides]

You have to realize that mykookaid and questions are HIV denialists. By definition they ignore all available science and evidence, because it doesn't fit their agenda.

What their motives are is really a mystery. Some of them are just stupid. Others are in denial, and are desperate. And then you have soulless motherfuckers like kookaid who sell quack therapies (look up Olivia Love Worthy) and target black people & gays because they are groups she hates.

[quidproquo2004]

I realized they were some breed of conspiracy nut, but I was unaware of how laughably and damnable some of these people are.

thanks

[Allen10579]

@hivquestions bullshit

[hivquestions]

@Allen10579 when the courts allow the evidence we will see what the truth is - til then just get angry at the rich people and the politicians they control with lots and lots of money - they all lie to us and this was too big a lie for them to get away with - they will pay in the end

[Allen10579]

@hivquestions I wonder what's really going on with all this shit, I've watched a few video's, they say there's a link between aids and syphilis, here google this video: The Cause of AIDS: Fact and Speculation" 1/4: HIV - A Deadly Virus? there's four parts to it, it was really good,

[YourEternalFriend]

@hivquestions One question: the article says that Mr. Gardelis was following his treatment (drugs). Aren't the drugs you claim that cause AIDS?

And something else: it is very common for an HIV+ who takes his medication to be found HIV- after a long period.

[Rasnixful]

HIV "theory" is a hoax invented by the denialists. HIV as the causal agent of AIDS is a fact. Proven scientifically over 15 years ago. Which is why you desperate denialist cunts have to lie to people.

The facts don't fit your agenda.

[zander469]

@Rasnixful Whether anyone believes in this virus or not, what is true is that there has never ever been any scientific proof that the Aids virus even exists or that HIV causes Aids. This is a fact. I am not a denialist but i know this is true. Sure it may exist but there is no proof.

[hivquestions]

thanks for replying to the message i sent out when i shared this video from my personal channel. and thank you for your logical assessment of hiv and AIDS. future generations will thank us.

[TheLogicJunkie]

They MIGHT thank us. But they probably won't. In fact, the way the world works seems to me to be that they will comprise a hateful herd that vilifies us, until such time as they themselves are backed up against the wall to the nth degree, and then they'll finally realize something is amiss (because the masses are asses), and that's when they'll start forming angry mobs.

...However, the end result will probably be that the villains write themselves in the history books as having been heroes.

[hivquestions]

i think i agree with that, but only because i've been watching one too many alex jones videos lately.

[anthj79]

Wow... Pessimistic, are we?

[TheLogicJunkie]

Well, I think the real question is: Are my negative appraisals an accurate reflection of the true nature of actual reality?

...I would argue "Yes".