@tylerboy10100 Were thinking as good as we can. What? Did God give the scientists knowledge to build the LHC? No. there in not a single tiny spec of proof that god is real. And before you say it, the bible means nothing, it just says "Believe in the silly nonexistent 'God' that created everything"
@inmonkeyness What makes you think epiphanies are not inspiration from God? You can't prove that it isn't, nor can you prove that it is. You will remember whatever you have said. There is no "I don't remember" defense when judgement comes. There is the "I didn't know" defense though, but it only works if you really didn't know. But it doesn't get you anywhere anyway.
@inmonkeyness well put it this way, if you dont believe you die or be burned, if you do believe you die or be sent to a wonderfull place, ill take my chances
@MrHotshot1998 Ugh. I hate to say this, but step outside. Think. Think why this is here, not who created it. Think why you believe. Think why you don't study cells to save lives. Think why you pray and waste your valuable life. Think already!
@MrHotshot1998 Don't "believe" in what... god? Who's god? The one in the Bible, Quran, the Torah, some silver and gold plates in a hat?? A mind is like a parachute, it works best when it's OPEN. Try it sometime before they find you armed to the teeth in the basement of some "fanatical stronghold", or your parents see pics of you covered in a sheet wearing brand new shoes in bunk beds with a couple hundred others.
I think God would have made more than us, do you think that in all his infinite wisdom he only made us? stop being so selfish and serve God by opening up your mind.
actually there would be no need for a year because there wouldn't be any seasons no matter how far off the orbit went in 40 seconds the planet would never have a chance to cool off to any noticeable difference. it would actually be kind of strange to live there with the light flickering on and off about every 30 seconds or so
no what im saying is that if that planet isn't spinning then it would be a day, meaning, that it would would take 40 seconds to go from dark all the way to light. a year wouldn't be 40 seconds it would then be 14,600 seconds or 243.333333333333333 minutes or 4.0555555555555555 hours
@mcplanetearth How is there a dark side of the sun? It's luminous, meaning it gives off its own light. Meaning, all of it is bright, no dark. Sun spots look dark compared to the rest of the surface but if you were right next to one (disregard the temperature that immediately burns you for a moment) you'd still be blinded. (assuming naked eye/improper gear)
@pikalulz007 It's a CGI video I made about exoplanets and a fictional brown dwarf within 2 light years of our solar system. Some scientists actually hypothesize this thing exists . Either way the vid is on my channe 15 minutes long 20 exomoons orbitting a brown dwarf strar. I like speculative fiction and incorporate it into my CGI coursework.
@ExForceFire Its an animation. But this is a real star but you cant film it because the sun's light is too bright so they use physics to detect if a planet is next to the sun then more physics to zoom on the planet and work out its size etc. 9they use maths too).
@G3org3Master the way they find planets is when theres an absence of light where the light used to be and then they check how much of the light is missing to determine its size and shit like that
What's all this talk about objects (WITH MASS OF ALL THINGS) moving faster than C? C itself changes based on circumstance, and it is simply impossible to go beyond that dynamic change.
There should be no argument. The very bending of space-time itself prevents this.
space-time itself can expand faster than the speed of light. any celestial object beyond a certain distance from a viewer would be moving away faster than it's light can reach the viewer it seems our light horizon is approaching it's physical limit.
quantum physics has another bag of tricks entirely. i'm curious to see how it all ties together.
Fact is there is no such thing as fact. Science is the knowledge we've gathered and our best guess as to how something works. The Pythagorean Theory has been around for far too long to even be considered a theory, we just accept it for what it is, and it works because it does.
@Baconatorrr the pythagorean theorum is actually a mathematical statement that can be proven on paper and is always true, it is not a theory like the theory of relativity is,
@AStarSifter Well if that indeed is a fact, then one can go and squish a bunch of oxygen and hydrogen together and "make" water. It's not as simple as you had just put it. There's way more to it than that. Oxygen and hydrogen surround us without anyone drowning. I can't believe your that frank.
@Baconatorrr I am talking about it's chemical compostion, water is made of hydrogen and oxygen, or sometimes Deuterium and oxygen. And i prefer blunt to frank.
Personally, I'd rather be skeptical about the measurements made by whoever discovered this planet than about the theory of relativity, which has been tried and confirmed many times... it could be wrong, but i find it hard to believe, seeing as it has been demonstrated that causality breaks down as soon as faster-than-light speeds (for a significant lapse of time) enter the picture. However, if there is a gravitational abnormality near the planet, relativity might even explain its FTL velocity.
@17352195746655 Well it's likly its not faste than light, it has the apperance of faster than light, if in fact is was faster than light it whould not orbit a star, and it whould likely be invisible to us
@AStarSifter I don't think invisibility would enter into it really; if it were faster than light, light could still bounce off the object if the ray were (at least nearly) perpendicular to the direction the object is moving in. Also, any object moving at the speed of light can orbit a center of gravitational attraction at a certain radius (in GM units, at three times the mass). The reason why it might not be FTL is because of a possible contradiction with special or general relativity.
@17352195746655 Well for everytihng excluding a black hole the excape vilocity of less than c, becuse of this if the object moves at or above c it will not orbit an object other then a black hole, and if it's faster then c in may not be visible. Actualy the Planet whould also have an excape vilocity less then c, it whould likly be torn to pecies...
@AStarSifter you're confusing escape velocity with orbiting velocity. escape velocity would be, radially pointed from the center of attraction, so that the magnitude of the velocity would be affected by 'acceleration' and a velocity of c is required to escape at the event horizon. if orbiting velocity is mentioned, it's different, as the magnitude of velocity isn't changed, only its direction, and per GR equations (i can't cite specifics here) a stable orbit is maintained at R=3M at velocity c.
@AStarSifter for an object to be torn to pieces, stress has to be exerted, so a force has to be applied. however, because an orbit is in free-float, no force is applied, as the satellite's change in local time per a lapse of frame time proceeds at an extremum (principle of extremal aging), although tidal forces may act with large radius changes. however, it is in a stable orbit, so that its radius doesnt change much and therefore no tidal forces act on it, so it can't be 'torn to pecies'
@AStarSifter this is a bit of a mixup. i'll use an analogy. if you shine light from a lighthouse and it turns in an arc large enough so that the circle of light exceeds the speed of light, this is entirely possible, as no information or energy is being transmitted faster than light. in the same way, the shadow formed by the planet against the star would seem to be the inverse of a spinning lighthouse, as it blocks out the circle of light, but the analogy applies.
Ehhhhm , i'm not an expert or something but does the double slit test not show us there is something faster then light? i'm kind of a noob on the matter but when only observing can change the way sub atomic particles behave then is not the act of observing faster then light, and in extention conciousness being faster then light?
@nevyn1 you're right in saying that certain phenomena in quantum mechanics (such as entanglement and quantum superposition) would appear to allow information to travel faster than light (although i don't see how double slit applies). The thing to grasp is that relativity is a classical theory, so that quantum mechanics isn't incorporated, and furthermore it is a macroscopic approximation, so that quantum effects do not apply at such large scale as we're discussing currently.
Everyone stating that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. They're not wrong, but they're not right either. In science, the objective is find answers, but when you think you have found the answer, never stop questioning it. This is not how we progress. Along time ago, people use to think that earth was flat, and that was law, but look at us today:)
@benner2000 Yes its good to question, but just to let you know, the flat earth theory wasnt a scientific law, It was a theory. Laws are descriptive. Such as specific boundaries, descriptions of motion and force. etc.
@qiankundanuoyi1 Our bodies would not be able to travel that fast, since it is even faster than how our atoms move. At least that's what I learned in Physics.
FTL travel is possible but only in very abstract mathematical models. Genuine superluminal travel is not.
I'm not arguing that a civilisation more advanced than our own might have found a way around or through these mathematical models or a way to implement them, but unfortunately it does seem unlikely.
Relativity does not however imply that objects cannot go superluminal if they are already doing so.
Actually, the term "Theory" in science means something completely else than in normal language. A scientific theory is a collection of proven facts that helps to explain a natural phenomenon.
Furthermore, what makes you think we would stand a chance? They can travel faster than lightspeed and ignore gravity and we're still trying to fly our ships with explosions behind them...
I didnt say it meaning i was stating it as fact. General reception is that aliens have technology far more advanced beyond our own. The original poster implied we would have to shoot all aliens when they arrived. Well, chances are if they got here in a timely fashion, scientific facts show they would have to be travelling faster than the speed of light. Any info you read on "alien" UFOs also implies they have the ability to move in ways our aircraft cant. Which is the point of MY comment.
So yeah. Thats why I said they would be able to travel faster than light and have gravity defying technology. I dont KNOW that for sure, i was making a general comment in a humorous light. Furthermore, if aliens showed up one day, having mastered inerplanetary travel, what makes you think they WOULDNT have technology that makes our cutting edge stuff look like garbage? I was puting emphasis on how ignorant the original poster was being.
I find it interesting that we can take the flimsiest of evidence of intelligent life beyond our own living on another planet in our SAME universe, and say they can do all these things that our physics can't; but we have a whole world that SOMEHOW CANNOT believe that a single deity in ANOTHER universe can speak everything into existence; and reprogram our universe's physics like it was XHTML and CSS, just to perform what we call miracles.
Exceeding the speed of light, atleast within this universe, is impossible. Most likely scenario includes warp drive, where the vessel is not moving but rather being propelled by the distorted fabric of space and time.
I am just initiating a correction, your point is still valid. Their technology would far surpass our own.
Only zero mass objects can reach this speed. Otherwise if it has a mass, it could take an infinite amount of energy to reach this speed. So, it's impossible for us to travel faster than speed of light; if this case was true, we will be traveling backwards in time relative to another frame leading us to an undiscovered but possible theory.
They do have upper and more sofisticated technology due to they work together not waring each other like often occurrs between humankind.
I must correct myself. By our current knowledge of the laws that govern our universe it is impossible to travel at, or over the speed of light. If there are any exceptions or the contrary is true, it is not yet known.
At this point I am putting my hopes towards warp drive more than ever exceeding the speed of light. Not only because I think it is more likely, but because without an indefinite velocity potential, reaching the farthest areas of our universe will prove to be arduous.
Unlimited?? A Neuron can conduct an impulse more or less at about 120meters per second. That's 1 / 2,500,000th the speed of light. If that's what you mean.
Our brains' conductivity is utter crap compared to our modern electronic devices.
@Transcentity Actually... our brain calculates over billions and billions of precesses every second. Every nerve in your body, every action you think about doing or do or plan on doing is being processed at the same time. Every word you think. Every muscle in your body that moves. Every twitch in yoru eye. Every color you see. The brain, is by far, more superior than technology in terms of what it can do, its multifunctional abilities... Now, if i can only get mine to work like a calculator...
@Ultdeed I was talking about conductivity, not processes per second. While our neurons pale in comparison to moders circuits in terms of conductivity, yes, our brains still by far have the upper hand for being ale to perform so many calculations per second.
Was I supposed to believe that video footage was real? A planet traveled around its sun in less time than it takes to watch a commercial or take a piss? I guess planets do travel faster than the speed of light! HA HA HA!! PISS OFF!!
it's simply a planet circling a sun. the technique they use to find planets has to do with the dimming of the light received from the star when the planet passes between the viewer and the star.
This is insanity, What clip did this group watch,have we just watched a different clip, Who knows,,, Well somebody knows of that you can be assured!,,, lets get outa here vogueboy somethin aint right Bro
How could 2 people just appear.out of nowhere. back then the people were so dumb there is no way in hell they could raise people, or the people could raise themselves. evolution makes so much more sense
let me put it this way since i got so many thumbs down if a intelligent being from another universe came and asked did u discover evolution? would you have an answer for him? think about it for a second instead of making comments that make no sense.. heres a trick question what came before time?? maybe this will get you on your way.... got an answer?
what came after the worlds creation?
2 people suddenly apeared from nowhere and started reproducing?
You could answer back to that alien: "would you have discovered it then?" What's the meaning who discovered evolution anyway, I don't see your point.
The right thing is just ask for superintelligence "what is the truth of all." If it can tell the right answer, your marveling becomes meaningless.
"what came before time", you ask. Well, first don't assume that there's something 'before' time. Time may as well be an endless contunuum or loop back and forth.
human rulez like killing and other dont do stuff the bible was written then came an update which is the quran and then another update which is the new testemony with jesus and stuff
those were the rulez that man had to learn
now we have other rulez and we need gods assistence to help us out with the new rulez like gravity and evolution and time and other things but as long as were not ready he wont come........
Except that there is no god - it's just a romanticized concept of humans to deal with the unknown and the feelings of solitude. Concepts of a god/gods are also good at creating an optimistic vision of future that look more pleasurable (like Heaven), drive people to act at a favored way, and to make everything seem simplistic - a god created all so there's no need for thinking it further.
you cant say thier isn't a god what created earth then before thier was earth this was nothing what made that nothing-ness and who made the being that made the nothing-ness thiers got to be someone who made all this thiers no way everything jusy apered
Yes, you are right - I can't say for sure that god doesn't exist. Still, scientific probability that god doesn't exist is about 99,9999% hence there is almost no chance at all that a god may exist.
When you are choosing between 99,9999% and 0,0001% when there is no actual benefit for choosing, you may freely pick the pleasurable one. But if you believe that you lose something (e.g. a space of Heaven) when you pick a wrong choice of EITHER chances, then the most people will bet on that 99,9999%.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
u are right actually, dont understand that many people think that is all perfect system made by itself. lol
cant they they the preciseness of planets, the time, sun, moon. weather water, even every single thing ????? just study on only one object or thing for suppose its egg and you will reveal thousands of mysteries and perfection and every mystery will speak itself that we have been mane by the creator of the all Universe who is the superior of all.
this is so true, when I did a speech for C.S / B.S (Bible Study)...( lol ) I stated that the Christian faith was built on fear, fear of death and that we need someone / something (the bible) to tell us how we should behave so that we may not fear ourselves or the future
Are you 6? The way you are wording yourself and spelling your words makes me and any other person here with a elementary education want to crawl into a corner and die.
I spent 1min thinking... what the hell am I watching?
Frontlinecool 4 months ago
This was made with a program called Celestia.
Qw3rtypop 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1) Hold your breath.
2) Copy all of these steps.
3) Go to two other video.
4) Paste it in the comments.
If you can do all of this without breathing you're a good pot smoker
MW3INF0 7 months ago
newscientistvideo really needs to add audio to more of their videos.. just a short explanation or something
nigelmatthews74 8 months ago 2
@nigelmatthews74 definately, some of them are boring as shit!
Marktheshtfgenius 6 months ago in playlist fgh7
işşi
zeyneb2007 8 months ago
Thumbs if you touched your screan trying to clean that little point on the start.
xThales183x 9 months ago 32
@xThales183x yes i did
bigpimpinnh 7 months ago
there are trillians of stars so think how many planets there could be there could be other people in our universe :)
haxx49 9 months ago
Cool story bro.
sophmiester 9 months ago
how did you animate that
frankensteinnn1 9 months ago
@BarbnGrill if you believe in a god after all the shit that goes on in the world today, you Sir/Madam are the moron
jimmyvok 10 months ago
@jimmyvok i believe in god :).
and: and with all this shit, the humans are the guilty, not god.
learn more, think better plz.
tylerboy10100 10 months ago
@tylerboy10100
But didn't your god create everything?
And know the past, present, and future?
SmokenMaryJane 9 months ago
@tylerboy10100 Were thinking as good as we can. What? Did God give the scientists knowledge to build the LHC? No. there in not a single tiny spec of proof that god is real. And before you say it, the bible means nothing, it just says "Believe in the silly nonexistent 'God' that created everything"
inmonkeyness 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@inmonkeyness What makes you think epiphanies are not inspiration from God? You can't prove that it isn't, nor can you prove that it is. You will remember whatever you have said. There is no "I don't remember" defense when judgement comes. There is the "I didn't know" defense though, but it only works if you really didn't know. But it doesn't get you anywhere anyway.
toasterder 7 months ago
@inmonkeyness well put it this way, if you dont believe you die or be burned, if you do believe you die or be sent to a wonderfull place, ill take my chances
MrHotshot1998 6 months ago
Comment removed
inmonkeyness 6 months ago
@MrHotshot1998 Ugh. I hate to say this, but step outside. Think. Think why this is here, not who created it. Think why you believe. Think why you don't study cells to save lives. Think why you pray and waste your valuable life. Think already!
inmonkeyness 6 months ago
@MrHotshot1998 Don't "believe" in what... god? Who's god? The one in the Bible, Quran, the Torah, some silver and gold plates in a hat?? A mind is like a parachute, it works best when it's OPEN. Try it sometime before they find you armed to the teeth in the basement of some "fanatical stronghold", or your parents see pics of you covered in a sheet wearing brand new shoes in bunk beds with a couple hundred others.
carlwitt75 4 months ago
@BarbnGrill if you beleive in a god with all the shit that goes on in the world today, you sir/madam are the ling, propagander toting moron
jimmyvok 10 months ago
OMG EYEBALL!!!
orangefab1990 11 months ago
Thumbs up if you tried wipping that dot off your screen!
SpencerII7 11 months ago
@SpencerII7 Did it.
mafthb 11 months ago
In other news. Jupiter has commited suicide.
A letter was later found, stating "i'm not pretty".
sillentskills 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That sure is a thing you have there
eternalgracenote 1 year ago
@MoviPro
There is! There's something stuck on the lens, some bug probably or a small piece of tape, which makes it look like aliens.
ALIENS DON'T EXIST, yo! Haha, fools... lol Totally gay. lol
Igoryok1990 1 year ago
Huh I don't understand this. If anything passed Earth we would have known about it by now.
SuzLa1 1 year ago
@SuzLa1 the Jews died in the Holocaust.
hardstyle905 1 year ago
watch,dont fish and drive!
GLWillaims 1 year ago
UFOs are Demonic entities that the Anti Christ will blame as abductions instead of giving Glory to God when He Raptures His Church !
Nope, I am not kidding, not even a little.
As for me and my house, we WILL serve our Lord: Jesus Christ ! ! ! !
bRadicalmagic1 1 year ago
@bRadicalmagic1
I didn't know demons flew UFOs.
I think God would have made more than us, do you think that in all his infinite wisdom he only made us? stop being so selfish and serve God by opening up your mind.
mastermajid 1 year ago
Damn, that was fast! I guess a year only takes about 40 seconds on that planet, hehe. : )
winterstellar 1 year ago
@winterstellar
um no. actually that would indicate one day takes about 40 seconds.
and not technically true because some planets travels around it's star but don't spin so leaving one side constant light and one side constant dark
jmyjms86 1 year ago
@jmyjms86 What, didn't it orbit it's star in 40 seconds? Are you suggesting that we orbit the Sun in 24 hours???: )
winterstellar 1 year ago
@winterstellar Hihi, and why the 365 day year then? What would be so special about orbiting the Sun "365 times"?: )
winterstellar 1 year ago
@winterstellar
actually there would be no need for a year because there wouldn't be any seasons no matter how far off the orbit went in 40 seconds the planet would never have a chance to cool off to any noticeable difference. it would actually be kind of strange to live there with the light flickering on and off about every 30 seconds or so
jmyjms86 1 year ago
@winterstellar A day is a single rotation; a year is a single revolution.
Player01198756 1 year ago
@Player01198756 Hehe, did I say rotation instead of revolution? Ouch:)
winterstellar 1 year ago
@jmyjms86
no what im saying is that if that planet isn't spinning then it would be a day, meaning, that it would would take 40 seconds to go from dark all the way to light. a year wouldn't be 40 seconds it would then be 14,600 seconds or 243.333333333333333 minutes or 4.0555555555555555 hours
jmyjms86 1 year ago
watch?v=EgwIYdm9rXs DARK SIDE OF THE SUN new vid
mcplanetearth 1 year ago
@mcplanetearth How is there a dark side of the sun? It's luminous, meaning it gives off its own light. Meaning, all of it is bright, no dark. Sun spots look dark compared to the rest of the surface but if you were right next to one (disregard the temperature that immediately burns you for a moment) you'd still be blinded. (assuming naked eye/improper gear)
pikalulz007 1 year ago
@pikalulz007 It's a CGI video I made about exoplanets and a fictional brown dwarf within 2 light years of our solar system. Some scientists actually hypothesize this thing exists . Either way the vid is on my channe 15 minutes long 20 exomoons orbitting a brown dwarf strar. I like speculative fiction and incorporate it into my CGI coursework.
mcplanetearth 1 year ago
@mcplanetearth OH. Now I see what you meant by that... okay.
pikalulz007 1 year ago
@mcplanetearth it was not well titled.
gtmilenko 1 year ago
i was preparing for any screamers..
64526206 1 year ago 4
the sun his moon?
RijenRijen 1 year ago
a lot ot times, you can develop odd sexual problems around heart problems/ death/ intense pain.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
aliens are hallucinations(dead memory of reptile-things) that have to do with sexual problems.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
so you are implying that its a chode planet?
mdc2296 1 year ago
just don't point that thing at uranus
MPSecare 1 year ago 3
@MPSecare OHO!
jewfishie2 1 year ago
is that a 3D Animation or a real plnet going round & round & ... im not gonan repeat...
it's star'?
ExForceFire 1 year ago
@ExForceFire Its an animation. But this is a real star but you cant film it because the sun's light is too bright so they use physics to detect if a planet is next to the sun then more physics to zoom on the planet and work out its size etc. 9they use maths too).
G3org3Master 1 year ago
@G3org3Master the way they find planets is when theres an absence of light where the light used to be and then they check how much of the light is missing to determine its size and shit like that
edwardmanboy 1 year ago
thats a sun or a start
DavidRockin1 1 year ago
Is that in real-time? I mean, does it go around the sun every 20 seconds? Because THAT would be be very fast.
Gabumon54321 1 year ago
@Gabumon54321 one second in animation = one hour in reality. Still pretty fast.
noxure 1 year ago
@noxure Wow, that's fast.
How do you know it is one second to an hour?
Gabumon54321 1 year ago
@Gabumon54321 the link in the description box says it orbits its sun once every 20 hours.
tjv323 1 year ago
@tjv323 Oh, I see.
Gabumon54321 1 year ago
HOLY CRAP! is it not too close to the sun?
aizik2005 1 year ago
hahaha the ufc made a wrong turn. he had to go back around the sun. he must of left something back at the last intergolactic coffee house
kylescotternest 1 year ago
WoW! That must be it mus be hell trying to find your dropped Car Keys.... dark, light, dark, light, dark, light, ....lol
TERRY72763 1 year ago
ok what the hell just happend? A sperm is trying to get into the egg while one sperm watching?
generko 1 year ago 3
looks like celestia to me....
ba3cool 1 year ago
What's all this talk about objects (WITH MASS OF ALL THINGS) moving faster than C? C itself changes based on circumstance, and it is simply impossible to go beyond that dynamic change.
There should be no argument. The very bending of space-time itself prevents this.
ChrisFlyingOne 1 year ago
@ChrisFlyingOne
space-time itself can expand faster than the speed of light. any celestial object beyond a certain distance from a viewer would be moving away faster than it's light can reach the viewer it seems our light horizon is approaching it's physical limit.
quantum physics has another bag of tricks entirely. i'm curious to see how it all ties together.
ajre82 1 year ago
@ajre82 he said C, not c. I think he got confused by the concept of warp drive and started talking about his hard drive. ;-)
noxure 1 year ago
Fact is there is no such thing as fact. Science is the knowledge we've gathered and our best guess as to how something works. The Pythagorean Theory has been around for far too long to even be considered a theory, we just accept it for what it is, and it works because it does.
Baconatorrr 1 year ago 4
@Baconatorrr the pythagorean theorum is actually a mathematical statement that can be proven on paper and is always true, it is not a theory like the theory of relativity is,
captainzerb 1 year ago
@captainzerb Relitivity has been proven
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@Baconatorrr Well yes there are facts, such as Oxygen and Hydrogen Make water, it's not a guess it's a fact.
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@AStarSifter Well if that indeed is a fact, then one can go and squish a bunch of oxygen and hydrogen together and "make" water. It's not as simple as you had just put it. There's way more to it than that. Oxygen and hydrogen surround us without anyone drowning. I can't believe your that frank.
Baconatorrr 1 year ago
@Baconatorrr I am talking about it's chemical compostion, water is made of hydrogen and oxygen, or sometimes Deuterium and oxygen. And i prefer blunt to frank.
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@17352195746655 ye totaly agree
Reuben961 1 year ago
0:01
monkeyfly30 2 years ago
Thanks
JonnehsWorld 1 year ago
Personally, I'd rather be skeptical about the measurements made by whoever discovered this planet than about the theory of relativity, which has been tried and confirmed many times... it could be wrong, but i find it hard to believe, seeing as it has been demonstrated that causality breaks down as soon as faster-than-light speeds (for a significant lapse of time) enter the picture. However, if there is a gravitational abnormality near the planet, relativity might even explain its FTL velocity.
17352195746655 2 years ago 2
One question. HOw the Heck do you remember your User name>?
graphattic 2 years ago 23
haha good question, I don't, I just copy-paste it whenever I get a comment notification by email
17352195746655 1 year ago 2
@graphattic
same way i remember mine
KillerBananification 9 months ago
@graphattic i dont get it, i had no preoblem remembering this account, i dont even subcribe this thing...
RizeMeteor 7 months ago
that is the biggest number known to man.. or rather 1 man.. me lol
FreonRose 1 year ago
well every other username was taken so i just went with a random string of numbers... and here i am now
17352195746655 1 year ago
@17352195746655 Well it's likly its not faste than light, it has the apperance of faster than light, if in fact is was faster than light it whould not orbit a star, and it whould likely be invisible to us
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@AStarSifter I don't think invisibility would enter into it really; if it were faster than light, light could still bounce off the object if the ray were (at least nearly) perpendicular to the direction the object is moving in. Also, any object moving at the speed of light can orbit a center of gravitational attraction at a certain radius (in GM units, at three times the mass). The reason why it might not be FTL is because of a possible contradiction with special or general relativity.
17352195746655 1 year ago
@17352195746655 Well for everytihng excluding a black hole the excape vilocity of less than c, becuse of this if the object moves at or above c it will not orbit an object other then a black hole, and if it's faster then c in may not be visible. Actualy the Planet whould also have an excape vilocity less then c, it whould likly be torn to pecies...
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@AStarSifter you're confusing escape velocity with orbiting velocity. escape velocity would be, radially pointed from the center of attraction, so that the magnitude of the velocity would be affected by 'acceleration' and a velocity of c is required to escape at the event horizon. if orbiting velocity is mentioned, it's different, as the magnitude of velocity isn't changed, only its direction, and per GR equations (i can't cite specifics here) a stable orbit is maintained at R=3M at velocity c.
slartibartfast1992 1 year ago
@AStarSifter for an object to be torn to pieces, stress has to be exerted, so a force has to be applied. however, because an orbit is in free-float, no force is applied, as the satellite's change in local time per a lapse of frame time proceeds at an extremum (principle of extremal aging), although tidal forces may act with large radius changes. however, it is in a stable orbit, so that its radius doesnt change much and therefore no tidal forces act on it, so it can't be 'torn to pecies'
slartibartfast1992 1 year ago
Inviblity becuse it's moving faster than light, so it whould not beable to block out the light from the star
AStarSifter 1 year ago
@AStarSifter this is a bit of a mixup. i'll use an analogy. if you shine light from a lighthouse and it turns in an arc large enough so that the circle of light exceeds the speed of light, this is entirely possible, as no information or energy is being transmitted faster than light. in the same way, the shadow formed by the planet against the star would seem to be the inverse of a spinning lighthouse, as it blocks out the circle of light, but the analogy applies.
slartibartfast1992 1 year ago
@slartibartfast1992
Ehhhhm , i'm not an expert or something but does the double slit test not show us there is something faster then light? i'm kind of a noob on the matter but when only observing can change the way sub atomic particles behave then is not the act of observing faster then light, and in extention conciousness being faster then light?
nevyn1 1 year ago
@nevyn1 you're right in saying that certain phenomena in quantum mechanics (such as entanglement and quantum superposition) would appear to allow information to travel faster than light (although i don't see how double slit applies). The thing to grasp is that relativity is a classical theory, so that quantum mechanics isn't incorporated, and furthermore it is a macroscopic approximation, so that quantum effects do not apply at such large scale as we're discussing currently.
slartibartfast1992 1 year ago
Comment removed
slartibartfast1992 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The difference being the Earth "being" flat was not science at all. We know nothing with mass (that part's important) can.
maynardr6 2 years ago
Everyone stating that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. They're not wrong, but they're not right either. In science, the objective is find answers, but when you think you have found the answer, never stop questioning it. This is not how we progress. Along time ago, people use to think that earth was flat, and that was law, but look at us today:)
benner2000 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
maynardr6 2 years ago
@benner2000 Yes its good to question, but just to let you know, the flat earth theory wasnt a scientific law, It was a theory. Laws are descriptive. Such as specific boundaries, descriptions of motion and force. etc.
boorens18 2 years ago
i thought there was a little more to this vid than a planet going round its star a few times...
MoviPro 2 years ago 59
@MoviPro What do you expect from evolutionists? God-hating morons are liars and propagandists.
BarbnGrill 11 months ago
@BarbnGrill I'm suprised you were intellectually capable of creating a youtube account, what with you never EVOLVING all the way to 'humanity' yet...
tehjow 11 months ago
u can not go faster than light ..
the only way to travel large distances fast is by taking a shortcut throo a wormwhole ..but that would destroy u into little particles ....
so i guess we are stuck in this solar system forever :)
unless u send a huge ship with people reproducing and maybe after like 200 years they reach destination...
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
@sidewaysfcs0718 lol rubbish. We already have rays that travel faster than light. And I swear we can travel even 14 times faster than light.
qiankundanuoyi1 2 years ago
14 times faster than light?
are insane?
nothing can travel faster than c
c is the speed of light in a vacuum
we have stuff that can travel 99.9999999% c wich is faster than light on earth in air ..
but nothing that has mass can travel at c..
rays that travel 14 times faster than c??? are u clinically retarded?
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago 2
@qiankundanuoyi1 Our bodies would not be able to travel that fast, since it is even faster than how our atoms move. At least that's what I learned in Physics.
KrystalKlear20 2 years ago
FTL travel is possible but only in very abstract mathematical models. Genuine superluminal travel is not.
I'm not arguing that a civilisation more advanced than our own might have found a way around or through these mathematical models or a way to implement them, but unfortunately it does seem unlikely.
Relativity does not however imply that objects cannot go superluminal if they are already doing so.
Gokukillaah 2 years ago
actually relativity says nothing can go faster than light ... if it did it would literally go into the past violating causality laws....
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
@sidewaysfcs0718 relativity, in your knowledge, is only half right.
qiankundanuoyi1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's why relativity is a THEORY. Notice the strong emphasis on the word THEORY. Dumbass.
DreamNeonBlack 2 years ago
@DreamNeonBlack
Actually, the term "Theory" in science means something completely else than in normal language. A scientific theory is a collection of proven facts that helps to explain a natural phenomenon.
kitwol 2 years ago
relativity is actually prooven u idiot ...ever heard of the GPS?
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
if there was aliens couldent we just shoot the fuck out them all?
RossKerr255 2 years ago
Would we have to?
Furthermore, what makes you think we would stand a chance? They can travel faster than lightspeed and ignore gravity and we're still trying to fly our ships with explosions behind them...
Gileum 2 years ago
? Alien Planet doesn't mean it has aliens on it, it means it is 'alien'. It doesn't nessecarily suggest there is life on there
julzeatspu 2 years ago
What makes you think they can travel faster than lightspeed and ingore gravity anyway?
Pl0xz0r 2 years ago
I didnt say it meaning i was stating it as fact. General reception is that aliens have technology far more advanced beyond our own. The original poster implied we would have to shoot all aliens when they arrived. Well, chances are if they got here in a timely fashion, scientific facts show they would have to be travelling faster than the speed of light. Any info you read on "alien" UFOs also implies they have the ability to move in ways our aircraft cant. Which is the point of MY comment.
Gileum 2 years ago
So yeah. Thats why I said they would be able to travel faster than light and have gravity defying technology. I dont KNOW that for sure, i was making a general comment in a humorous light. Furthermore, if aliens showed up one day, having mastered inerplanetary travel, what makes you think they WOULDNT have technology that makes our cutting edge stuff look like garbage? I was puting emphasis on how ignorant the original poster was being.
Gileum 2 years ago
@Gileum
I find it interesting that we can take the flimsiest of evidence of intelligent life beyond our own living on another planet in our SAME universe, and say they can do all these things that our physics can't; but we have a whole world that SOMEHOW CANNOT believe that a single deity in ANOTHER universe can speak everything into existence; and reprogram our universe's physics like it was XHTML and CSS, just to perform what we call miracles.
DozerfleetProd 2 years ago
Exceeding the speed of light, atleast within this universe, is impossible. Most likely scenario includes warp drive, where the vessel is not moving but rather being propelled by the distorted fabric of space and time.
I am just initiating a correction, your point is still valid. Their technology would far surpass our own.
Transcentity 2 years ago
Only zero mass objects can reach this speed. Otherwise if it has a mass, it could take an infinite amount of energy to reach this speed. So, it's impossible for us to travel faster than speed of light; if this case was true, we will be traveling backwards in time relative to another frame leading us to an undiscovered but possible theory.
They do have upper and more sofisticated technology due to they work together not waring each other like often occurrs between humankind.
sundayheaven 2 years ago 3
is it impossible because einstein said so, or because they actually proved it?
gambrinus330116 2 years ago
I must correct myself. By our current knowledge of the laws that govern our universe it is impossible to travel at, or over the speed of light. If there are any exceptions or the contrary is true, it is not yet known.
At this point I am putting my hopes towards warp drive more than ever exceeding the speed of light. Not only because I think it is more likely, but because without an indefinite velocity potential, reaching the farthest areas of our universe will prove to be arduous.
Transcentity 2 years ago
what about the speed of thought?
it's unlimited right?
gambrinus330116 2 years ago
@gambrinus330116
Unlimited?? A Neuron can conduct an impulse more or less at about 120meters per second. That's 1 / 2,500,000th the speed of light. If that's what you mean.
Our brains' conductivity is utter crap compared to our modern electronic devices.
Transcentity 2 years ago 2
@Transcentity Actually... our brain calculates over billions and billions of precesses every second. Every nerve in your body, every action you think about doing or do or plan on doing is being processed at the same time. Every word you think. Every muscle in your body that moves. Every twitch in yoru eye. Every color you see. The brain, is by far, more superior than technology in terms of what it can do, its multifunctional abilities... Now, if i can only get mine to work like a calculator...
Ultdeed 2 years ago
@Ultdeed I was talking about conductivity, not processes per second. While our neurons pale in comparison to moders circuits in terms of conductivity, yes, our brains still by far have the upper hand for being ale to perform so many calculations per second.
If only the best of both worlds was met... =]
Transcentity 2 years ago
I jizzed in my pants
TheElectrickCompany 2 years ago 2
i came
ancalites 2 years ago 2
I feared it was a pop-up screamer at the end
JimmyTheObscure 2 years ago 2
whats the point?
womfer 2 years ago
dobbleUteeEff
DaleSparrow 2 years ago
I must say, all these videos are horribly disappointing...
Chocol6 2 years ago 5
dumb
oldfacefull 2 years ago
"Illustrated animation courtesy of COROT/Tautenburg Observatory/Klaudia Einhorn" ANIMATION!
Remman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Was I supposed to believe that video footage was real? A planet traveled around its sun in less time than it takes to watch a commercial or take a piss? I guess planets do travel faster than the speed of light! HA HA HA!! PISS OFF!!
jpupdog72 2 years ago
"Illustrated animation"
Read the description
Hax666G 2 years ago 5
hey dip shit "(Illustrated animation courtesy of COROT/Tautenburg Observatory/Klaudia Einhorn) "
why dont you read
VincentValentine15 2 years ago 2
Clearly you must see that this is not not actual footage and that it is quite obvious? Are you really that stupid?:S
Remman 2 years ago 3
DUH! The description says "Illustrated animation courtesy of ..."
And nobody said it was real time either.
realisticHomeboy 2 years ago
This kids a fuckin retard...
jszekerj 2 years ago
Nice try being intelligent, jpupdog72.
metabog 2 years ago
ummm wow its jus a moon goin aroun a planet in fast forward
CJRulz04 2 years ago
a flashlight and 2 insects???
streetkingz14 2 years ago
what was that video of
cedarpd 2 years ago 2
E.T. COME HOME!!
halochief2 2 years ago 5
it's E.T phone home
JFMatador 2 years ago
celestia
darufett 2 years ago
Timelapse photography of sorts, very simple
FlameSpartan 2 years ago
i dont get it.
pyromaniac347 2 years ago
it's a planet.
Alex123456797 2 years ago
Yes it was presented in animation so that people could understand. But please explain what is it. I just dont understand that.
snoiprocs16 2 years ago
it's simply a planet circling a sun. the technique they use to find planets has to do with the dimming of the light received from the star when the planet passes between the viewer and the star.
Alex123456797 2 years ago
fast alien world discoverd..
i saw the same animation with a diffirent story
i bet ya i could make an animation of a pink elephant spinning around the sun.
and tell people that it's from nasa.
whoopdeefriggindoo 2 years ago 3
Perhaps if you'd care to watch the sources in the description, and maybe click on the link, you wouldn't have made that comment.
Devilsnightforlife 2 years ago
haha omg yeah do that it would be so funny if it would be world news xD
TurnkeyJonas 2 years ago
uhhh wat is this video about
im sooo confused rite now
robslady32 2 years ago
This is insanity, What clip did this group watch,have we just watched a different clip, Who knows,,, Well somebody knows of that you can be assured!,,, lets get outa here vogueboy somethin aint right Bro
LimitingFactor00 2 years ago
It's amazing, that watching this video, and reading almost everyones' comments on it, is that they don't even remotely relate to one another.
Imagine if you will, if the video had audio? Then the comments would've been definately been more confusing.
vogueboy1 2 years ago
How could 2 people just appear.out of nowhere. back then the people were so dumb there is no way in hell they could raise people, or the people could raise themselves. evolution makes so much more sense
aberkland 2 years ago 2
let me put it this way since i got so many thumbs down if a intelligent being from another universe came and asked did u discover evolution? would you have an answer for him? think about it for a second instead of making comments that make no sense.. heres a trick question what came before time?? maybe this will get you on your way.... got an answer?
what came after the worlds creation?
2 people suddenly apeared from nowhere and started reproducing?
now think about the other coment i made..
Soulico 2 years ago
"would you have an answer for him? "
You could answer back to that alien: "would you have discovered it then?" What's the meaning who discovered evolution anyway, I don't see your point.
The right thing is just ask for superintelligence "what is the truth of all." If it can tell the right answer, your marveling becomes meaningless.
"what came before time", you ask. Well, first don't assume that there's something 'before' time. Time may as well be an endless contunuum or loop back and forth.
Dhanne1 2 years ago
sorry for my technical language but i think i explained myself well
Soulico 2 years ago
ok listen to my on the spot theory
when there were no rules and i mean the
human rulez like killing and other dont do stuff the bible was written then came an update which is the quran and then another update which is the new testemony with jesus and stuff
those were the rulez that man had to learn
now we have other rulez and we need gods assistence to help us out with the new rulez like gravity and evolution and time and other things but as long as were not ready he wont come........
Soulico 2 years ago
Except that there is no god - it's just a romanticized concept of humans to deal with the unknown and the feelings of solitude. Concepts of a god/gods are also good at creating an optimistic vision of future that look more pleasurable (like Heaven), drive people to act at a favored way, and to make everything seem simplistic - a god created all so there's no need for thinking it further.
Dhanne1 2 years ago
you cant say thier isn't a god what created earth then before thier was earth this was nothing what made that nothing-ness and who made the being that made the nothing-ness thiers got to be someone who made all this thiers no way everything jusy apered
blanchardjosh1994 2 years ago 3
Yes, you are right - I can't say for sure that god doesn't exist. Still, scientific probability that god doesn't exist is about 99,9999% hence there is almost no chance at all that a god may exist.
When you are choosing between 99,9999% and 0,0001% when there is no actual benefit for choosing, you may freely pick the pleasurable one. But if you believe that you lose something (e.g. a space of Heaven) when you pick a wrong choice of EITHER chances, then the most people will bet on that 99,9999%.
Dhanne1 2 years ago
lol... intelligence fail.
Evantheowl 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u are right actually, dont understand that many people think that is all perfect system made by itself. lol
cant they they the preciseness of planets, the time, sun, moon. weather water, even every single thing ????? just study on only one object or thing for suppose its egg and you will reveal thousands of mysteries and perfection and every mystery will speak itself that we have been mane by the creator of the all Universe who is the superior of all.
venominalVirus 2 years ago
This reasoning is known as the "god of the gaps" argument.
goldhoarder 2 years ago
You need to reread your sentences, i couldnt understand anything you said.
slippedonturd 2 years ago
what the fuck are you typing .
pretty sure you are missing out words or using the wrong ones , sort it out if your going to preach to people.
Ritaliation 2 years ago
this is so true, when I did a speech for C.S / B.S (Bible Study)...( lol ) I stated that the Christian faith was built on fear, fear of death and that we need someone / something (the bible) to tell us how we should behave so that we may not fear ourselves or the future
tomdamonkey999 2 years ago 2
Are you 6? The way you are wording yourself and spelling your words makes me and any other person here with a elementary education want to crawl into a corner and die.
CrusoeCale 2 years ago 4
hahaha
amin
11045168 2 years ago
i didnt understand a word from this:D
bloodpowner2 2 years ago 2