Holocaust = The "Murder" of jews in ww2 by the nazis.
notice that there are no gypsies, or criminals, PoWs included, the Holocaust was exagurated. jews made eugenics look bad, so they would allow humans to mix, and then later on strike us when we're all weakened.
@mogul50 actually there are number of Jewish doctors who suggested eugenic policies during formation of Israel . Unfortunately libtards had a fit about it .
Great info,thanks ! So Plato & Aristotle gave the base for Eugenics & sir Galton & co. did the rest.Genetics are very useful in stopping hereditary diseases,but it is nurturing that leads to genius & a better planet.It wasn't the Nazi's,it was the SS ( Todeskopf Eskaders ) who were running Germany.Or more generally: It's not the elite but the elite above the elite that do multiply & use means of population control (Check out ''The Georgia guide stones'') to keep the flock as their cattle.
I'm in favor of Eugenics. I would like a society of beautiful, healthy, smart people, not retarded, ugly, diseased people. I want to get rid of welfare because inferior people get welfare so they breed inferior babies. IF anyone should be paid to have babies, it's smart & beautiful people! I would like to completely get rid of the type of people who are at the bottom of society. They are worthless and a big burden.
@XanaduZune i'm for it 100%, i'm a mentally challenged man and i had my parents get me sterilised when i was 20 years old so i can't reproduce. there is a good chance i could father a mentally challenged child. i'm very happy i was sterilised.
@XanaduZune You are assuming you have the right to dictate who is fit. You DON'T. People who are in power DO therefore YOU and your family would be subjected to testing to see whether you're fit, healthy, or attractive. You'd put your life in danger for these policies? I don't think so. I find people like you funny b/c you think your voice would count. You never consider the fact that YOU are on the same side of the ugly, unfit, etc. because you have no power.
I'm in favor of eugenics. In a way, we all are in favor of eugenics because we want to mate with people who are good looking, intelligent, sane, and have a good income.
If you can't judge self instead of referring to the late policies of Der Natzionalistiche Demokratpartei as the total and complete judge of the idea, then you are at the bottom of the stock.
If I told you Hitler gave away bread to the people, would you stop eating bread?
If I told you the engineers and garage technicians that invented the first Volkswagen did so on Hitlers specific orders, would you stop driving your Volkswagen?
If we can't look past that then EVERYBODY lost the war.
You are correct, eugenics was used during the slave trade both (commonly) through the natural selection of who survived the grueling life of slave work long enough to have children and (less commonly) as a planned means to product "quality stock." There are some great academic journal articles that go into the long aftermath of these efforts.
In my knowledge the first civilization using a eugenics like idea were the Greek Spartans. They were killing the babies that were unable to be good warriors...For some reason thought people believe that the Spartans were great...don't know why...
part2. I think that future ganerations have the right to be borned as intelligent, talented and well-minded as possible and who ever takes that right away, even by just doing nothing, is worse than a childmurderer.
part1. Good video.I hope that eugenics will be used widely in the future. I see it as the best and most ethically correct way to secure the existance and quality of our speacies on the long run. If eugenics (and population control) had been used more in the past, so many global problems and inhuman suffering could have been avoided.
THE ONLY NEGATIVES 1: forced abortions (monitoring society will be effortless and very simple for everyone, it would also even be private), 2: couples of different races, and besides for couples where both partners are already mixed, should not be allowed to bare each others children, adoption, IVF is another option.
that's it. all other factors would take part of positive eugenics.
eugenics in all its forms is totally discriminative, encourages racism, prejudice and downright hatred of those preceived to be different. How dare anybody set themselves up as though they were God judging others according to what they think the make up of the perfect person aught to be. eugenics should be banned worldwide in all its forms.
Eugenics is simply the greek word for 'WELL-BORN', it does not say as to how it would be done or who is the 'well', it only encourages people to be born well. This leads to mean that the 'weak'(whatever that would classify to be), should have a birthrate as low as possible and under 2 children per woman, while the 'well', should bare more than 2 children per woman on average, with as much as possible
It says absolutely nothing about how it should be done. Therefor you can't call it those at all
Joseph, competent and interesting job in general. (And ambitious). Your choice of included material--and omitted--is a good first survey. And most importantly, you state how eugenics can prevent human heartbreak-a good thing.
As you know, we are on the edge of a Brave New World, & we have better be thoughtful of what we want. I would have just added that we don't know the complexity of most genes as of yet.
how about the eugenics of the spartan race?it was ok if you were a warrior ,.but if you happened to be a slave captured in a work camp .which ever way you look at eugenics .,it stinks .the american project to genetically control the human race is an abomination.
Nice video, well presented, etc. You might want to do something about the lighting next time. Subject matter was informative, and only slightly biased. Personally i think that artificial selection is over rated, simply having good genetics doesn't prevent 'good stock' parents from bringing up uneducated monsters.
Yeah and that leads to the dysgenics theory where the intelligent are less fertile than the sub intelligent. Something has to be done, either to save the earths resources or to save our species from losing the intelligence that makes it unique.
Another small aprt of the eugenics argument is that the earth is believed to be overpopulated by 4 billion people. On top of that, due to the bell curve nature of intellligence, only 1 in 3 people on earth have IQs over 110. Think about that.
According to stats, the average IQ has been steadily falling, it is now 7 points below what it was 50 years ago, all this in the very time when it should rise due to IT
true, but we still absolutely need it, it's much kinder than even the current system, if you have to factor in all the illnesses that people get and the general stupidity in society is another whole lot more. alex jones and his conspiracy theories are distorting the real meaning of it.
Eugenics Core Agenda is now hidden in Genetics. Behind the Idea of GMO for seed exclusiveness and crop optimization is the goal of population control and reduction though corporate means.
I agree, but we would still need to take hold somewhat, i think that something like a one-child policy would work, people will have a choice between being monitored, then abortion, or just temporal sterilization.
The biggest problem i see is that the government is running the operation. Also the whole idea that the best of the best is so easily definable. Standardized testing or success in an evil, immoral, greed driven society doesn't fully convince me that these people are the genetic cream.
Yeah ,i strongly advocate intermarrying .. interbreed.,hybridizing..whatever. I say why not. I live in the liberal NW where no one thinks anything of dating whoever, a visit to my parents in TN proves that even in America there are still 'old world' ideas at play. Slowly but surely i guess.
so eugenics has nothing to do with race at all in essence . Like mutts in the dog world, they are known to be superior. dont think we can design something better than the serendipity of Nature!=D Go human Mutts..
well I think a large percentage of people still mate up by race[or color] and even religion with conscious effort, even if the reasons are subliminal. Todays budding adults were born just as segregation ended. So we have to give our collective selfs time to 'evolve' into basically 1 human race, though I think we my fight it all the way.
I think I understand what you are saying, And probably the best way to rid ourselves of the genetic abnormalities and diseases that are specific to certain ethnic groups and races will be the eventual 1 human race.
My point is that eugenics seems to be a pretty slippery area, even with the best of intentions. It's one thing to screen for tay sachs disease. But anything that involves a "master plan" kind of worries me.
The problem I see with Eugenics is that we don't really understand exactly how genes work, not to mention which gene combination will give us more chances of survival.By trying to make human population smarter we might make them more vulnerable to certain diseases without knowing it.I think we must learn to genetically manipulate life forms perfectly before venturing into something like this,I mean we don't even know exactly what Intelligence is and we don't have an accurate system of measurment
Holocaust = The "Murder" of jews in ww2 by the nazis.
notice that there are no gypsies, or criminals, PoWs included, the Holocaust was exagurated. jews made eugenics look bad, so they would allow humans to mix, and then later on strike us when we're all weakened.
mogul50 1 year ago
@mogul50 actually there are number of Jewish doctors who suggested eugenic policies during formation of Israel . Unfortunately libtards had a fit about it .
sewagedweller 2 months ago
Eugenics = nagative all the way. never has been positive, ur moms fit to reproduce btw. dont let anyone lie to u about it.
deceiver123m 1 year ago
Great info,thanks ! So Plato & Aristotle gave the base for Eugenics & sir Galton & co. did the rest.Genetics are very useful in stopping hereditary diseases,but it is nurturing that leads to genius & a better planet.It wasn't the Nazi's,it was the SS ( Todeskopf Eskaders ) who were running Germany.Or more generally: It's not the elite but the elite above the elite that do multiply & use means of population control (Check out ''The Georgia guide stones'') to keep the flock as their cattle.
Ace4Tree1 1 year ago
I'm in favor of Eugenics. I would like a society of beautiful, healthy, smart people, not retarded, ugly, diseased people. I want to get rid of welfare because inferior people get welfare so they breed inferior babies. IF anyone should be paid to have babies, it's smart & beautiful people! I would like to completely get rid of the type of people who are at the bottom of society. They are worthless and a big burden.
XanaduZune 1 year ago
@XanaduZune i'm for it 100%, i'm a mentally challenged man and i had my parents get me sterilised when i was 20 years old so i can't reproduce. there is a good chance i could father a mentally challenged child. i'm very happy i was sterilised.
TheBigboy46 1 year ago
@XanaduZune You are assuming you have the right to dictate who is fit. You DON'T. People who are in power DO therefore YOU and your family would be subjected to testing to see whether you're fit, healthy, or attractive. You'd put your life in danger for these policies? I don't think so. I find people like you funny b/c you think your voice would count. You never consider the fact that YOU are on the same side of the ugly, unfit, etc. because you have no power.
votumseparatum1 1 year ago
I'm in favor of eugenics. In a way, we all are in favor of eugenics because we want to mate with people who are good looking, intelligent, sane, and have a good income.
XanaduZune 1 year ago
"Infinite diveristy with infinite combination is the essence of truth and beauty."......... Mr. Spock, Star Trek.. :-)
chairde 1 year ago
If you can't judge self instead of referring to the late policies of Der Natzionalistiche Demokratpartei as the total and complete judge of the idea, then you are at the bottom of the stock.
If I told you Hitler gave away bread to the people, would you stop eating bread?
If I told you the engineers and garage technicians that invented the first Volkswagen did so on Hitlers specific orders, would you stop driving your Volkswagen?
If we can't look past that then EVERYBODY lost the war.
David1531992 2 years ago
wasn't eugenics used in the slave trade, to breed the fittest, so that their children would be better, stronger workers?
(just by the way, i haven't decided my stance on eugenics, so this is just a question, no implications or hidden meanings within the question)
mushroomanchilli 2 years ago
You are correct, eugenics was used during the slave trade both (commonly) through the natural selection of who survived the grueling life of slave work long enough to have children and (less commonly) as a planned means to product "quality stock." There are some great academic journal articles that go into the long aftermath of these efforts.
maverjoe 2 years ago
altruistic eugenics - breeding licence should depend on your ability to look after others
walter0bz 2 years ago
eugenics is a nazi - fascist ideology , inhuman and evil
mondohartford 2 years ago
In my knowledge the first civilization using a eugenics like idea were the Greek Spartans. They were killing the babies that were unable to be good warriors...For some reason thought people believe that the Spartans were great...don't know why...
darkheart220982 2 years ago
part2. I think that future ganerations have the right to be borned as intelligent, talented and well-minded as possible and who ever takes that right away, even by just doing nothing, is worse than a childmurderer.
Ymryet 2 years ago
part1. Good video.I hope that eugenics will be used widely in the future. I see it as the best and most ethically correct way to secure the existance and quality of our speacies on the long run. If eugenics (and population control) had been used more in the past, so many global problems and inhuman suffering could have been avoided.
Ymryet 2 years ago
The music is too loud.
HugoKamino 2 years ago
THE ONLY NEGATIVES 1: forced abortions (monitoring society will be effortless and very simple for everyone, it would also even be private), 2: couples of different races, and besides for couples where both partners are already mixed, should not be allowed to bare each others children, adoption, IVF is another option.
that's it. all other factors would take part of positive eugenics.
LiveTruthForever 3 years ago
eugenics in all its forms is totally discriminative, encourages racism, prejudice and downright hatred of those preceived to be different. How dare anybody set themselves up as though they were God judging others according to what they think the make up of the perfect person aught to be. eugenics should be banned worldwide in all its forms.
mollynolan1 3 years ago
Eugenics is simply the greek word for 'WELL-BORN', it does not say as to how it would be done or who is the 'well', it only encourages people to be born well. This leads to mean that the 'weak'(whatever that would classify to be), should have a birthrate as low as possible and under 2 children per woman, while the 'well', should bare more than 2 children per woman on average, with as much as possible
It says absolutely nothing about how it should be done. Therefor you can't call it those at all
LiveTruthForever 3 years ago
Joseph, competent and interesting job in general. (And ambitious). Your choice of included material--and omitted--is a good first survey. And most importantly, you state how eugenics can prevent human heartbreak-a good thing.
As you know, we are on the edge of a Brave New World, & we have better be thoughtful of what we want. I would have just added that we don't know the complexity of most genes as of yet.
JHSibal 3 years ago
how about the eugenics of the spartan race?it was ok if you were a warrior ,.but if you happened to be a slave captured in a work camp .which ever way you look at eugenics .,it stinks .the american project to genetically control the human race is an abomination.
mrgeorgegenius 3 years ago
Nice video, well presented, etc. You might want to do something about the lighting next time. Subject matter was informative, and only slightly biased. Personally i think that artificial selection is over rated, simply having good genetics doesn't prevent 'good stock' parents from bringing up uneducated monsters.
gavinj64738 3 years ago
Yeah and that leads to the dysgenics theory where the intelligent are less fertile than the sub intelligent. Something has to be done, either to save the earths resources or to save our species from losing the intelligence that makes it unique.
07751434 3 years ago
Another small aprt of the eugenics argument is that the earth is believed to be overpopulated by 4 billion people. On top of that, due to the bell curve nature of intellligence, only 1 in 3 people on earth have IQs over 110. Think about that.
07751434 3 years ago
According to stats, the average IQ has been steadily falling, it is now 7 points below what it was 50 years ago, all this in the very time when it should rise due to IT
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
eugenic does refile the lost of natures selection...problem is that it is controlled by humans and not by nature
RedDeadRevolva 3 years ago
Eugenics nowadays,is not used to create some superrace.Its is currently used to create a super stupid,easy to control,everconsuming race.
And its working really really well!!!
Eugenics isn`t a bad thing at all,but you can use it for very bad things,i`d say...
THEOUTSIDE 3 years ago
true, but we still absolutely need it, it's much kinder than even the current system, if you have to factor in all the illnesses that people get and the general stupidity in society is another whole lot more. alex jones and his conspiracy theories are distorting the real meaning of it.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
Eugenics Core Agenda is now hidden in Genetics. Behind the Idea of GMO for seed exclusiveness and crop optimization is the goal of population control and reduction though corporate means.
See also:
"Seeds of Deception"
"Agenda 21"
allymetoo 3 years ago
Positive Eugenics is the only way to go.
mbamber 3 years ago
I agree, but we would still need to take hold somewhat, i think that something like a one-child policy would work, people will have a choice between being monitored, then abortion, or just temporal sterilization.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
The biggest problem i see is that the government is running the operation. Also the whole idea that the best of the best is so easily definable. Standardized testing or success in an evil, immoral, greed driven society doesn't fully convince me that these people are the genetic cream.
mrbl4ck 4 years ago 2
Well done. I'm glad that more people started thinking about that.
Maxnoviya 4 years ago
Yeah ,i strongly advocate intermarrying .. interbreed.,hybridizing..whatever. I say why not. I live in the liberal NW where no one thinks anything of dating whoever, a visit to my parents in TN proves that even in America there are still 'old world' ideas at play. Slowly but surely i guess.
jojo808 4 years ago
so eugenics has nothing to do with race at all in essence . Like mutts in the dog world, they are known to be superior. dont think we can design something better than the serendipity of Nature!=D Go human Mutts..
jojo808 4 years ago
Well, that line of thinking (directed evolution) is certainly not new.
It tends to have disastrous results when put into practice though don't you agree?
maverjoe 4 years ago
well I think a large percentage of people still mate up by race[or color] and even religion with conscious effort, even if the reasons are subliminal. Todays budding adults were born just as segregation ended. So we have to give our collective selfs time to 'evolve' into basically 1 human race, though I think we my fight it all the way.
jojo808 4 years ago
I think I understand what you are saying, And probably the best way to rid ourselves of the genetic abnormalities and diseases that are specific to certain ethnic groups and races will be the eventual 1 human race.
My point is that eugenics seems to be a pretty slippery area, even with the best of intentions. It's one thing to screen for tay sachs disease. But anything that involves a "master plan" kind of worries me.
maverjoe 4 years ago
The problem I see with Eugenics is that we don't really understand exactly how genes work, not to mention which gene combination will give us more chances of survival.By trying to make human population smarter we might make them more vulnerable to certain diseases without knowing it.I think we must learn to genetically manipulate life forms perfectly before venturing into something like this,I mean we don't even know exactly what Intelligence is and we don't have an accurate system of measurment
alvarodelamo 3 years ago
Nope we know everything there, 23andme d0t c0m :) Objective, Honest, Kind, and fair Eugenics !
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
What the nazis did at the Jews can only be called dysgenics. Jews where the most talented race, they
relatively contibuted most to science. Before the nazi
era it was the jews who relative most where
awarded the iron cross for bravery. So when
the nazis say they want to kill the jews for eugenic purpeses they must be lying.
Further more if people confuse eugenics with WW2 they
often do that because there ill informed or wan't
to give (true) eugenics a bad name.
beerschoten 4 years ago
You've got some talent, young man.
sandokant2007 4 years ago
why thank you....check out my other video: "Sexual Orientation and Ewe"
maverjoe 4 years ago
very good information, thank you
actevo 5 years ago