@skysnet@FesterBable Pilots The FAA and TSA are just scared. It's not just the radio waves their concerned about, but the 1/1000000+ chance that electromagnetic transmision from the SCREEN or the device will interfere with the aircraft's electrical WIRING. But the actual chance of interference is far less than published. And on VFR flights, you can use electronics (just no phone CALLS), so why not IFR?
@artur4467 how come? lol.. what do you mean? all you could see would be a plane crashing into WTC... how would it solve the misteries? ... ffs its clear enought that it was an inside job so there isn't even a point to solve anything...
@MrCaptainSr79 for that my dear America, you will have to have a wider-world-view... nothing personal, it's just that if you'd be intrested in something, you would do some research, i'm not going to explain anything here
@aquality12 You do not know anything about my education background, and I most likely have a much wider world view than you do. The real reason you do not provide me with any objective evidence is because you have none to offer. All the greatest 9/11 conspiracy theories are based on pseudoscience conducted by unreliable websites and institutions. Oh, and by the way, I actually have conducted a great deal of research in this topic as I used to be a 9/11 conspiracy theorist myself.
Hi SuredT, I have a question, 98% of pilots I see are wearing short sleeved shirts. Is there an option with some airlines to choose between long and short sleeved? Thanks
yes and... this is america :) ı want to go to america, michigan state. ı wish have small houese with garage and suv or track... and country town life.... this is american life in my opinion :)
ffs, everyone saying "turn off electrionical devices!" it doesnt matter!! ive recorded all my flights, nothing ever happend, and ive been on many many flights over the years....
@yekane1 fuck you homie. turn the shit off. It is not that one device can cause it, but rather a combination of devices could result in instrument inaccuracy.
@skysnet Nonsense. Do you think any pilot would risk his life in a machine which is that sensitive? An airplane is probably the one thing on this earth which is the least sensitive to any outside influences. Why would anyone design it otherwise?
@FesterBable navigation/flight controls are designed to sense weak signals on ground. radio waves originating on board can have more strength than a signal from far away simply due to their distance to instruments. slight inaccurate reading (say 1 degree) from hundreds of miles away can result in plane being way off course, think terrain. there is no way to test every device that can be on board or how they will interfere with each other or instruments, it is not worth the effort or the risk.
@skysnet How is a camera going to affect anything? It doesn't contain a transmitter. There is no risk at all, because if there were, airplanes would not be allowed to fly, or at least no one would be allowed to bring any electronic device on board whatsoever. Not even people with pacemakers. Planes are of course build and designed so that nothing can disturb their instruments. It is naive to think otherwise.
@FesterBable I take you are either a pilot (I am) or a radio wave engineer, so please share your wisdom with our friends at the FAA and FCC so they do too, can see the light. We have all been in the dark until you came. Thanks.
@skysnet Use your common sense. Do you think you would be allowed on board an airplane with a camera in your hand luggage if anyone thought there would be the slightest problem if you turned it on? A camera does not transmit radio waves. We do not need a radio wave engeneer for something that does not transmit radio waves. A thing that doesn't transmit radio waves does not interfere with radio wave receivers. Do you get it now?
@FesterBable I invite you to read FCC "Part 15 covers an assortment of electronic equipment that generates RF energy whether it's intentional, unintentional or incidental." What you are referring to are devices that intentionally emit, even a calculator can unintentionally or accidentally emit. Anyhow, do what you want, my explanation is obviously not satisfactory to you - I'm out.
@skysnet I don't need to read anything. My common sense is enough to tell me that everything is safe. Also, if you are really a pilot, then I don't understand how you dare fly a plane if you believe there are equipment on board which can potentially interfere with your instruments. That is not a risk any sane person would take.
@yekane1 Lol. If airplanes were really affected by digital cameras, I don't think anyone would ever dare fly in them. Of course nothing is going to happen. People just don't use their brains.
@yekane1 A good part of the reason that devices are to be switched off during take off and landing is so that your attention isn't diverted in the event of an emergency. Take off and landing is the most dangerous time of even the most routine of flights.
@yekane1 i think its just the antena you have to swicth off.....Still allowing you users to use the video device. its called "flight mode" on most phones.
Why isn't JFK International Airport in the top 5 busiest US airports? How is Denver always ahead of JFK? JFK is fuking huge and handles way more international passengers and international flights then Denver every day, and planes are everywhere on JFK runways, both international and domestic flights. JFK is a hub for everyone traveling overseas and domestic.
Everyone talking about electrical devices and cell phones. It's not bullshit, some cell phones and electrical devices really fuck with the systems on an aircraft and instead of saying "And if you own these electrical devices or cell phones" and then listing them, they tell everyone to turn everything off. It's easier, faster and your flights cost less because the airlines don't have to mess around finding out which devices fuck with the aircraft systems. That is all.
@englandish43 I am a private pilot and I have flown a passenger that had a cellphone that messed with the radio in the aircraft, so I had to ask him to turn it off. Normally we fly with our cellphones on, it's very rarely that a cellphone messes with the radio but it does happen. That is all.
@lardman2228 I have flown on private planes that required cell phones to be off as well, but on comparatively a massive aircraft like the B744, it honestly has minute, if any, interference.
can someone tell me when a pilot flares and put engines to idle does he making landing more smoother? what if he had put engines at idle at about 100ft would it make a difference?
aviation lovers, if you're interested I just uploaded a summary of a flight with air arabia, cockpit view. Very nice if you ask me, check out it out if you're interested.
@englandish43 you sure? Planes and electronic devices like Mobile Phones use the same type of electromagnetic wave to communicate (microwaves). Therefore interference is bound to occur which could affect the communication between the tower at the airport and the pilot. Even the slightest of miss conceptions between the tower and the pilot could lead to a disaster.
@1995a1995z You are correct that all thse admit microwaves and other forms of signals and radiation, however; None of these interfere with any system on an aircraft or they would not be allowed past security, Cameras and video recorders do not emit signals however are still on the list just to be fair. They have you shut down all devices mostly to be sure you understand the saftey and emergency plan and other security reasons.
@JTyler52 If it really was for the emergency security reasons then why only electrical devices? When I go on flights there are always people playing with cards and having fun with out electrical devices. Research was done and there was a clear correlation of radio communication instruments being faulty and sometimes even failing to work when mobile phones were being used in the cabin. They also concluded that the radiation of mobile phones exceeds the allowable rate of interference levels.
@1995a1995z After 911 the list of no-flight items expanded, However non of the electronic devices really made it on there, mostly because people need them to contact others after they arrive or depart. Trust me they would not allow any device on a plane that interfered with any of the planes systems, than they may be used as an act of terrorism. They don't allow phones and other device because they dont want distractions or contact others to cause terrorism on a plane.
@1995a1995z I believe it's been proven that even with strong amounts of radiation from mobile phones, there is no interference made with the communication and navigation systems on planes. I saw it on the Discovery channel, but I could be mistaken.
They say no cellular devices because of boring complexities about the electromagnetic waves blah blah blah! One of the main reasons (or the main reason) for why then do this is because if your texting your buddy or playing your PSP, and the flight crew announces something and your not paying attention, you might miss an impotent instruction or something like that. Plus, I like to watch airplanes take off/land. (Part II Next)
Part II If there is an emergency on board, and the crew needs to evacuate the aircraft, and your jammin out to the Top Gun song 'Danger Zone' on your iPod, your just a person in the way. Plus, can you live for 5 minutes w/o your phone? Plus, if you don't follow the rules the flight attendants say, it's a Felony :-]
@englandish43 The reason they ask to turn off all electronics is that they can't be sure how all new gizmoes that come out these days affect the plane's avionics. The manufacturers certainly can't test their products' safety to aircraft instruments. It's doubtful that cellphone signals can interfere even if every single passanger was babbling during the landing, since GSM/UMTS operate way above the reserved frequencies for aircrafts' systems, but it's a matter of better be safe than sorry.
@englandish43 The reason they so it is because they want people to pay attention if there is an emergency. Other than that there is no interference between the radios and the phones. Other than that your right its bs.
@englandish43 its because they want they you focus on the flight, if some emergency acures that you have the full attention and not wathing a movie. Cellular phones is the whole flight, not just landing. But its still bullshit:)
@keffje007 I doubt that is true; the airlines movie systems (that you pay to use) on Continental work from "gate to gate", and they advertise that as part of the benefit to get you to purchase it.
@rrz518 so they think they can let us purschase something to use for the last 15 minutes?? its only during landing/takeoff. And i never paid anything for onboard entertaining, the last flights I was on had monitors build in the seats with free headphones, even on economy class. So thats not the reason, they cant officially do that.
@shariar1995 "Possible" interference with the communications systems on board the aircraft, but unofficial tests have actually proven this is not the case. The signal strength of the cell phone simply isn't enough. However, the reason for the whole "electronic devices off" thing is primarily to stop passengers from being distracted in the event of an extra-ordinary situation that requires people to pay clos
Great smooth landing.
SEAVet69 4 hours ago
S M O O T H O p e r a t o r
fishmanMarch61 1 day ago
lol
okey4o 1 day ago
Excellent landing. Love the cock pit abgle the video was shot. Seldom see that angle which is nose on.
carlobari60 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you are coming from london and you want to see the manhattan from the air, which side of the airpalne is better to seat? (sry for my bad english)
DemetrisDK 3 days ago
really really the nicest landings ive seen, usually the camera shakes it looks over roading, well done
Hendri2285 4 days ago
This vid went viral on Cameroon
edwolf1127n 1 week ago
Beautiful !!!!!
riDDDiculous 1 week ago
I understand that. How well do you need to know maths? I'm english, so I'm fine with that.
BonJoviMad100 1 week ago
ILS?
Huevinh 1 week ago
@skysnet @FesterBable Pilots The FAA and TSA are just scared. It's not just the radio waves their concerned about, but the 1/1000000+ chance that electromagnetic transmision from the SCREEN or the device will interfere with the aircraft's electrical WIRING. But the actual chance of interference is far less than published. And on VFR flights, you can use electronics (just no phone CALLS), so why not IFR?
BenEidemMovies 2 weeks ago
@kwilson4961 I want to be one, but i don't know any more
BonJoviMad100 2 weeks ago
@BonJoviMad100 well you need to be dedicated to do this job
kwilson4961 1 week ago
Flawless landing.
JET997u 2 weeks ago
i wish i was in newyork again
JordyBerg82 2 weeks ago
awesome video big dog
luisaviation 3 weeks ago
That's cool!
levelat350 3 weeks ago
KLM <3 :D
FSXGamerz 3 weeks ago
short runway
MyPilot747 3 weeks ago
if the airplane that hit the world trade center had this camera all misteries bout that day all doubts could be clarified
artur4467 3 weeks ago
@artur4467 Right you are. Because undoubtedly that camera would have survived the crash and subsequent fire. Good thinking. Hmm-hmnn.
JET997u 2 weeks ago
@artur4467 how come? lol.. what do you mean? all you could see would be a plane crashing into WTC... how would it solve the misteries? ... ffs its clear enought that it was an inside job so there isn't even a point to solve anything...
aquality12 4 days ago
Tell me what objective evidence you have to support the claim that 9/11 was a conspiracy?
MrCaptainSr79 3 days ago
@MrCaptainSr79 for that my dear America, you will have to have a wider-world-view... nothing personal, it's just that if you'd be intrested in something, you would do some research, i'm not going to explain anything here
aquality12 1 day ago
@aquality12 You do not know anything about my education background, and I most likely have a much wider world view than you do. The real reason you do not provide me with any objective evidence is because you have none to offer. All the greatest 9/11 conspiracy theories are based on pseudoscience conducted by unreliable websites and institutions. Oh, and by the way, I actually have conducted a great deal of research in this topic as I used to be a 9/11 conspiracy theorist myself.
MrCaptainSr79 17 hours ago
105 people work at airbus
Nicolassalocinnomola 3 weeks ago 22
0:46 what is florida doing in new york
Chiliplease 3 weeks ago
great landing
crysis90war 3 weeks ago
dayuuum this pilot can flyy
whiteskull11 1 month ago 4
@whiteskull11 Pilots are usually good at flying ;D
nikthepilot 2 days ago
Enjoying veiwing
TheSwilson2466 1 month ago
Great View
MRBMYERS25 1 month ago
great video :)
MRBMYERS25 1 month ago
smooth touch down...
JRLine20288084 1 month ago
BEAUTIFUL
3928679 1 month ago
4R has water before it, while 4L has some kinda tiny island before it
timothyngim 1 month ago
I want this flight sim! Graphics are awesome! ;P Kidding. Thanks for sharing :)
TrueCourse 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you love the 'Landing'-category in Youtube's new design <3
MrKristoffer5 1 month ago
it looks like the secrecy is animated
Rybcclubpenguinvideo 1 month ago
Nice video. Thank you.
TedMichaelMorgan 1 month ago in playlist Plane Cockpit view
Hi SuredT, I have a question, 98% of pilots I see are wearing short sleeved shirts. Is there an option with some airlines to choose between long and short sleeved? Thanks
cossheisnmzenna 1 month ago in playlist cockpit experience
Cool graphics. Looks very real.
yynnmmbb 2 months ago
@yynnmmbb it is real lol
creedrulz6000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from SuredT
This has been flagged as spam show
hehe Im a young girl with the most incredible smile
SonyaEricmf169 2 months ago
reverse thrust superb! :)
joeygasper 2 months ago
O H H H R S S S O H M . . . total pros . . . just like buttah . . . ;)
I suppose no turbulence in the air is what permits such smooth landings . . . ?
Austyg 2 months ago
What a perfect landing! Wow!
a8quattro98 2 months ago
That's cool
jordanmeakin2000 2 months ago
I got a lot of HD aviation videos!
Please watch :-)
HamburgAirport 2 months ago in playlist aviacion
Who took this vid?
CRUISEOBRIEN1 2 months ago
hihi relax and enjoy my company
56louiseLemoine56 2 months ago
Nice landing
Rrasfly2 2 months ago
tihs is not JFK lol
BsbZentral 3 months ago
right on the marks, good landing
ItIsCoMpLiCaTeDsTuFf 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey guys, please do not flag this comment or anything, it's not spam.
Just thought you would like this video of me boarding the Lufthansa Airbus A380 in New York this summer. The best plane ever made!
/watch?v=Q3x2UJ-rDPM&feature
Enjoy and have a nice day! :)
SonSan96 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hehe I am a Hot 18 Girl and I am here to have fun
tomchionchio 3 months ago
yes and... this is america :) ı want to go to america, michigan state. ı wish have small houese with garage and suv or track... and country town life.... this is american life in my opinion :)
ankmuratt 3 months ago
it's fucking awesome.
gzhang6 3 months ago
ffs, everyone saying "turn off electrionical devices!" it doesnt matter!! ive recorded all my flights, nothing ever happend, and ive been on many many flights over the years....
shit, even pilot is recording ?? lol.
yekane1 3 months ago 47
@yekane1 Yer well You wont be saying this within the next 10 years
TheGAMEBOYS2000 2 months ago
@yekane1 fuck you homie. turn the shit off. It is not that one device can cause it, but rather a combination of devices could result in instrument inaccuracy.
skysnet 2 months ago
@skysnet pilot is recording, nuff said.
yekane1 2 months ago
@skysnet Absolutely right people do not understand this.
betabloca 1 month ago
@skysnet Nonsense. Do you think any pilot would risk his life in a machine which is that sensitive? An airplane is probably the one thing on this earth which is the least sensitive to any outside influences. Why would anyone design it otherwise?
FesterBable 1 month ago
@FesterBable navigation/flight controls are designed to sense weak signals on ground. radio waves originating on board can have more strength than a signal from far away simply due to their distance to instruments. slight inaccurate reading (say 1 degree) from hundreds of miles away can result in plane being way off course, think terrain. there is no way to test every device that can be on board or how they will interfere with each other or instruments, it is not worth the effort or the risk.
skysnet 1 month ago
@skysnet How is a camera going to affect anything? It doesn't contain a transmitter. There is no risk at all, because if there were, airplanes would not be allowed to fly, or at least no one would be allowed to bring any electronic device on board whatsoever. Not even people with pacemakers. Planes are of course build and designed so that nothing can disturb their instruments. It is naive to think otherwise.
FesterBable 1 month ago
@FesterBable I take you are either a pilot (I am) or a radio wave engineer, so please share your wisdom with our friends at the FAA and FCC so they do too, can see the light. We have all been in the dark until you came. Thanks.
skysnet 1 month ago
@skysnet Use your common sense. Do you think you would be allowed on board an airplane with a camera in your hand luggage if anyone thought there would be the slightest problem if you turned it on? A camera does not transmit radio waves. We do not need a radio wave engeneer for something that does not transmit radio waves. A thing that doesn't transmit radio waves does not interfere with radio wave receivers. Do you get it now?
FesterBable 1 month ago
@FesterBable I invite you to read FCC "Part 15 covers an assortment of electronic equipment that generates RF energy whether it's intentional, unintentional or incidental." What you are referring to are devices that intentionally emit, even a calculator can unintentionally or accidentally emit. Anyhow, do what you want, my explanation is obviously not satisfactory to you - I'm out.
skysnet 1 month ago
@skysnet I don't need to read anything. My common sense is enough to tell me that everything is safe. Also, if you are really a pilot, then I don't understand how you dare fly a plane if you believe there are equipment on board which can potentially interfere with your instruments. That is not a risk any sane person would take.
FesterBable 1 month ago
@FesterBable +1 to you sir
yekane1 1 month ago
@yekane1 They tell you to turn off electronic devices so you aren't distracted if they need to go over instructions in the event of an emergency.
Hand4Banana 2 months ago
@yekane1 Lol. If airplanes were really affected by digital cameras, I don't think anyone would ever dare fly in them. Of course nothing is going to happen. People just don't use their brains.
FesterBable 1 month ago
@yekane1 A good part of the reason that devices are to be switched off during take off and landing is so that your attention isn't diverted in the event of an emergency. Take off and landing is the most dangerous time of even the most routine of flights.
JET997u 2 weeks ago
@yekane1 their talking about cell phones and things that use wifi or 3g, itcan mess with the ILS and auto landings
AirlinePilotguy5 1 week ago
@yekane1
You are allowed to record. I always do that. The flight attendants have no problem with that. They mean game devices , phones etc.
hiimkian 5 days ago
@yekane1 i think its just the antena you have to swicth off.....Still allowing you users to use the video device. its called "flight mode" on most phones.
TommiTdi 4 days ago
YOU COULD EASILY SEE THE RIP CURRENTS IN THIS VIDEO !!!
s6xer 3 months ago
They are so freaking good at this. :0
Jungele 3 months ago
My word! I think that is quite possibly THE best landing I have ever seen!
fattyabbo 3 months ago
wow.. smooth landing!
cutemepo1213 3 months ago
ha I`m good looking babe, with great sense of humor
42backeindarbin22815 4 months ago
no fucking ads!
spewgilist 4 months ago
nice landing
dellheadryan 4 months ago
This is from Microsoft flight sim ? amazing. it looks very real.
JesusWasAnAsshole 4 months ago
@JesusWasAnAsshole it is a real landing.
mariamole011 4 months ago
Awsome i love videos like that, Thumbs up if you want to be a pilot!
kwilson4961 4 months ago 214
@kwilson4961 Hell yeah
DocterGoodness 2 months ago
@kwilson4961 I'm 14 years old and i hope i will be a pilot in 10 years :D And for the ones who are not sure. Never give up you're dream (:
xGloBalOfficial 2 months ago
@xGloBalOfficial haha same im 14
kwilson4961 2 months ago
@kwilson4961 Do you have FSX?
xGloBalOfficial 2 months ago
@kwilson4961 I like how most people complain about strait and level flight, but i think this is like the coolest job you could ever have
xxAbsoluteZero 2 months ago
@kwilson4961 And I'm gonna be ;)
MrMindaugasV 2 weeks ago
@MrMindaugasV good!
kwilson4961 1 week ago
Great video! Watch you lads fly into YYZ and it always seam's to be a perfect landing!
ForeverRed2011 4 months ago
Imagine following a glide slope into the ground because the stewardess had to make a phone call right next to the nav antennas. . .
keithacoustic1 4 months ago
This pilot reminds me of me, I also have a Canon Powershot S80.
66lwmorgan 4 months ago
Landing like a boss!
marnixlol 4 months ago
Why isn't JFK International Airport in the top 5 busiest US airports? How is Denver always ahead of JFK? JFK is fuking huge and handles way more international passengers and international flights then Denver every day, and planes are everywhere on JFK runways, both international and domestic flights. JFK is a hub for everyone traveling overseas and domestic.
Speed7743 4 months ago
@Speed7743 Denver Airport is the biggest in the country.
thomasc42 4 months ago
@thomasc42 Fuck Denver Airport Fuck Frontier Airlines and Fuck United Airlines!!!
Speed7743 4 months ago
@Speed7743 Mhm. Well yeah my mom works for American.
thomasc42 4 months ago
WoW right on the fucking line....INCREDIBLE pilots....can't believe how much we take this shit for granted!
christopherjc 4 months ago
smooth as butter. thanks APH
FrapsYou 4 months ago
Absolutely perfect!!
1vespa 4 months ago
look also in my channel... im also landing there greetings
xplanerom1 4 months ago
Im half british half dutch, is it at all possible to become a pilot with KLM?
CharIiePresents 4 months ago
@CharIiePresents you can be any nationallity
Judjefferys 4 months ago
KLM :']
FSXFan1090 4 months ago
that was the best landing i've seen ever
Cube3Productions 5 months ago
Now that, ladies and gentleman, is how you land a plane.
jazzdrum100 5 months ago
awesome!! centreline..
lawai0588 5 months ago
Everyone talking about electrical devices and cell phones. It's not bullshit, some cell phones and electrical devices really fuck with the systems on an aircraft and instead of saying "And if you own these electrical devices or cell phones" and then listing them, they tell everyone to turn everything off. It's easier, faster and your flights cost less because the airlines don't have to mess around finding out which devices fuck with the aircraft systems. That is all.
lardman2228 5 months ago
@lardman2228 Where is your proof? That is all.
englandish43 4 months ago
@englandish43 I am a private pilot and I have flown a passenger that had a cellphone that messed with the radio in the aircraft, so I had to ask him to turn it off. Normally we fly with our cellphones on, it's very rarely that a cellphone messes with the radio but it does happen. That is all.
lardman2228 4 months ago
@lardman2228 I have flown on private planes that required cell phones to be off as well, but on comparatively a massive aircraft like the B744, it honestly has minute, if any, interference.
englandish43 4 months ago
@englandish43 Bigger commercial aircraft use the same radio systems as small private aircraft.
lardman2228 4 months ago
Your best landing.
arjennovic 5 months ago
Boarding the Lufthansa A380 Video:
/watch?v=Q3x2UJ-rDPM&feature=channel_video_title
Enjoy! :)
SonSan96 5 months ago
Was je op pad met zo'n irritante Co die zijn mond niet kan houden tijdens de approach? ;-)
Leuke video's!
bokkenrijder172 5 months ago
Did I hear KLM 461 heavy? If that's the case then right now I'm tracking that flight! :D
ilikerio 5 months ago
great videos..thank u!
Aerolan1 5 months ago
you are pilot?
FFKarol 5 months ago
very soft landing xD
MegAmaNeo1 5 months ago
so shitty language ;>
AwesomeMikers 5 months ago
good landing, but i guess you had practice! JFK is still the best!
njshrivnauth 5 months ago
super smooth landinggg!!!! gosh
lagunabad 5 months ago
foi um pouso perfeito super macia as rodas,
adorei!!!
very cool
gre5s 5 months ago
i actually prefer the wing view on approach asd you get to see the flaps deploy. pilots miss out on that
210482fmj 5 months ago
im scared to fly in nyc
MrAUFANATIC 5 months ago
Zo helemaal een Nederlander, 30 augustus ga ik naar NY, via Newark
het word continental of delta, maar de vluchtcode is KL- ....
afcaj0od 5 months ago
perfect
Ouellette1978 5 months ago
Just for fun, and knowing that so many people don't obey rules. I'd love to see a pilot announce to the passengers something on final approach, like:
"We seem to be having an electrical malfunction in the cockpit, can everyone make sure your electrical devices are off?"
Then when deboarding, look for the guy who's black, blue & bleeding from the passengers frustrations.
Danbo342 5 months ago 15
Comment removed
TheZagunator 5 months ago
a calm day at JFK without having to fight crosswinds??? what a boring landing lol...
toospeed31 6 months ago
wow! perfect landing.
SemperFido9915 6 months ago
can someone tell me when a pilot flares and put engines to idle does he making landing more smoother? what if he had put engines at idle at about 100ft would it make a difference?
attractive64 6 months ago
wow that was a nice smooth landing for such a giant plane..good pilots
cleo0399 6 months ago 2
Start Spreading the NEWS
ThePhenomm 6 months ago
It is all about to learn about airplanes wich is so nice . A smooth landing better
gury0771 6 months ago
well done!!!!!
antonio81108 6 months ago
great landing
HussamAbuHanna 6 months ago
Nice landing!!!^^
ShionShinigami 6 months ago
lading here about 1 hour :)
darks249 6 months ago
Magnificent!
Thecutecoolguy 6 months ago
perfect landing
T1e2v3i4n6 6 months ago
have time to spare go by air:)
skipdownstairs 6 months ago
Comment removed
tomco2000 6 months ago
@tomco2000 "Minimums" sometimes called Decision Height, it's the lowest you're supposed to go without a visual before you have to call go around
espilon 6 months ago
@espilon
Thanks for the clarification. Listened several times and couldn't make it out.
tomco2000 6 months ago
aviation lovers, if you're interested I just uploaded a summary of a flight with air arabia, cockpit view. Very nice if you ask me, check out it out if you're interested.
MichaelNewmann 6 months ago
Was the pilot Russian? Whatever, he sounded so calm. "Check" - What a landing!
InTheCity3D 6 months ago
Amazing!!
susromf5 6 months ago
nice and smooth.
Good job!!!
GLOBALHAWKsimpit 6 months ago
smooth landing....nice
zestarm 6 months ago
I will be doing this tommorrow morning :) can't wait!
Armylad2k10 6 months ago
OK
rafazoobh 6 months ago
@IndependentIV It still ain't no piece of cake, right?
p759hysi 6 months ago
bows'
sebaswildboy 6 months ago
oooooh right between the markers..!
p759hysi 6 months ago
@p759hysi it's ILS approach that's why ;)
IndependentIV 6 months ago
Now this is cool! The ONLY thing that would make it perfect is if this was shot at pilot level (Pilot View). Thanks for sharing!
Blaze0357 6 months ago
and they say us to have our electronic devices switched off during landin..
cocolocochris 6 months ago 69
@cocolocochris You do realize that's all just BS right? They really just dont want cellular phones.
englandish43 6 months ago 44
@englandish43 you sure? Planes and electronic devices like Mobile Phones use the same type of electromagnetic wave to communicate (microwaves). Therefore interference is bound to occur which could affect the communication between the tower at the airport and the pilot. Even the slightest of miss conceptions between the tower and the pilot could lead to a disaster.
1995a1995z 6 months ago
@1995a1995z You are correct that all thse admit microwaves and other forms of signals and radiation, however; None of these interfere with any system on an aircraft or they would not be allowed past security, Cameras and video recorders do not emit signals however are still on the list just to be fair. They have you shut down all devices mostly to be sure you understand the saftey and emergency plan and other security reasons.
JTyler52 6 months ago
@JTyler52 If it really was for the emergency security reasons then why only electrical devices? When I go on flights there are always people playing with cards and having fun with out electrical devices. Research was done and there was a clear correlation of radio communication instruments being faulty and sometimes even failing to work when mobile phones were being used in the cabin. They also concluded that the radiation of mobile phones exceeds the allowable rate of interference levels.
1995a1995z 6 months ago
@1995a1995z After 911 the list of no-flight items expanded, However non of the electronic devices really made it on there, mostly because people need them to contact others after they arrive or depart. Trust me they would not allow any device on a plane that interfered with any of the planes systems, than they may be used as an act of terrorism. They don't allow phones and other device because they dont want distractions or contact others to cause terrorism on a plane.
JTyler52 6 months ago
@1995a1995z I believe it's been proven that even with strong amounts of radiation from mobile phones, there is no interference made with the communication and navigation systems on planes. I saw it on the Discovery channel, but I could be mistaken.
englandish43 6 months ago
@englandish43
They say no cellular devices because of boring complexities about the electromagnetic waves blah blah blah! One of the main reasons (or the main reason) for why then do this is because if your texting your buddy or playing your PSP, and the flight crew announces something and your not paying attention, you might miss an impotent instruction or something like that. Plus, I like to watch airplanes take off/land. (Part II Next)
NateTheGreatPilot 6 months ago
Part II If there is an emergency on board, and the crew needs to evacuate the aircraft, and your jammin out to the Top Gun song 'Danger Zone' on your iPod, your just a person in the way. Plus, can you live for 5 minutes w/o your phone? Plus, if you don't follow the rules the flight attendants say, it's a Felony :-]
NateTheGreatPilot 6 months ago
@englandish43 The reason they ask to turn off all electronics is that they can't be sure how all new gizmoes that come out these days affect the plane's avionics. The manufacturers certainly can't test their products' safety to aircraft instruments. It's doubtful that cellphone signals can interfere even if every single passanger was babbling during the landing, since GSM/UMTS operate way above the reserved frequencies for aircrafts' systems, but it's a matter of better be safe than sorry.
dugar1234 6 months ago
@englandish43 The reason they so it is because they want people to pay attention if there is an emergency. Other than that there is no interference between the radios and the phones. Other than that your right its bs.
soccersport 6 months ago
@englandish43 its because they want they you focus on the flight, if some emergency acures that you have the full attention and not wathing a movie. Cellular phones is the whole flight, not just landing. But its still bullshit:)
keffje007 5 months ago
@keffje007 I doubt that is true; the airlines movie systems (that you pay to use) on Continental work from "gate to gate", and they advertise that as part of the benefit to get you to purchase it.
rrz518 5 months ago
@rrz518 so they think they can let us purschase something to use for the last 15 minutes?? its only during landing/takeoff. And i never paid anything for onboard entertaining, the last flights I was on had monitors build in the seats with free headphones, even on economy class. So thats not the reason, they cant officially do that.
keffje007 5 months ago
@keffje007 They can and they do.
Before you spout off and speak of something you know nothing about, you should investigate.
rrz518 5 months ago
@englandish43 accualy cell phones transmitions interfer (bad spelling) with radio waves for the pilots
KinggaCobra 5 months ago
@englandish43 ... So you have to use the in-flight phone in the armrest and charge you £10 per minute lol.
sheldonholy 5 months ago
@englandish43 y not?
shariar1995 4 months ago in playlist airbus
@shariar1995 "Possible" interference with the communications systems on board the aircraft, but unofficial tests have actually proven this is not the case. The signal strength of the cell phone simply isn't enough. However, the reason for the whole "electronic devices off" thing is primarily to stop passengers from being distracted in the event of an extra-ordinary situation that requires people to pay clos