New 9 11 Video Analysis by Richard D Hall (Part 1)

[TheJagger93]

So 9/11 is a conspiracy?

[vengencefrom1979]

this is either an attempt to discredit the 9/11 truth movement or was done by an idiot. better footage reveals that the imaginary nose coming out of the south tower was not the nose but was debris.

[mujaku]

@vengencefrom1979 A Boeing 767 could not even get past the palisades. Take the palisades and accelerate them to 400 mph ramming them into a standing 767. The 767 will turn into aluminium confetti.

[wordgeezer]

Is it just me, or does wonald seem to have diarrhea of the piehole. As I have pointed out before, he is here only to produce disharmony, like, totally lame, you know, like diverting any conversation about evidence, Here's a free sample wonnie, from one of your own...

Google: Kenneth Feinberg speaks on 911 victim compensation

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

Apparently, on this forum she's band (sick)

Won lost... *wink*

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit Aw, that's a shame, and just as he was beginning to sound so authoritive.

Stopped by to visit won on his faux pootube channel and there are zero comments on anything...G%

youtubedotcom/comment_search?u­sername=ronaldwieck

No recent comments from ronaldwieck

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

Every Crim leaves fingerprints, WG...she simply CANNOT just shove her grubby hands up her always-empty pockets.

e.g., the 9/11 PerpeTraitors left HUGE fingerprints all over the crime of the century, as we've known over a decade now

Wen won gets banned, she simply prints her phony finger into another FB account.... then that one gets banned

In your algorithmic formula above, just substitute kangtimeford for ronaldwieck

and see what sticks out like thin-dogz proverbials

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard wordgeezer,

"Is it just me"

Yes, prick, it is just you.

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

ref your seriously-flagged comment "No, I can't explain it" is your admission of failure.

We understand, friend

Google micro-nuke, suitcase nuke, mini-nuke and you will discover that (y)our government's non-fictional military arsenal (the WMDs they pretend to control that friendly Iran ain't aloud to own) just might appall even the likes of you....not that we expect a second admission of failure so soon after yr first

But don't be so shy. Why not surprise US?

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard MrAutobuildit,

The only failures here are you moronic Twooftards. Your stupidity is appalling. I obviously meant that I can't explain anything to you because your too freaking stupid. And you didn't even understand that. OMFG, you prove my point without even realizing it. That is GD freaking hilarious.

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

Glad you enjoy the bellyache, dude ;-)

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

Anybody with normal intelligence ain't congenitally appalled as Ms F Kang pretends to be. We "normals" are extremely interested in the fascinating Inside-Job results of googling Direct Energy Weapons 9/11 (Hint: go direct to drjudywood com) ... check out the most-extraordinary scientific experiments of one John Hutchison (no "n"), experiments that had the military steal his entire laboratory.

HINT 2: Compare desktop Hutchison with real-time WTC demolition disasters

[kangtimelord]

Trident nuclear project?!?!? Surprised the moron didn't claim it was "micro-nukes"

XDXDXDXDXDXD

Freakin HILARIOUS!!!!

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

OK smartass, can YOU explain to US morons how a Direct Energy Weapon operates? I would've thought it IS a micro-nuke.

(HINT: Stick to your oath under the Military Commissions and Secret Treaties Act: your friendly 9/11 PerpeTraitor will be watching and waiting for you to blow a whistle)

[kangtimelord]

ATTN: MORON TWOOFTARDS

Subject: INSIDE JOB

New evidence WTC towers blasted by "Magna Flame Gun", not planes!!!!!!!

watch?v=ZQeFNpFK_pA&list=FLs8I­4PosxXFWJIEJmtB7hJQ&index=1&fe­ature=plpp_video

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

You'll need to get a SOH if you want to join the Real World out here beyond your kiddie komics, sonny

[wordgeezer]

There are few who have any admiration for the questionable art of debunking except for the trolls who participate in it. Nothing is really scrutinized because the official story must be defended.

The Chopper4 video, imo, is an important piece of evidence from the original WNBC video. The object that we see here was later changed to an airliner with a different trajectory.

Google:

WNBC saw a missile or small plane in Chopper4 video

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

You're 99% correct: a vital detail for the uninitiated;

The object we saw here was later changed but only in the "nose-out" horizontal scene where the IMAGE moved at an aeronautically-IMPOSSIBLE 579MPH.

At 700 feet ASL, over 360 MPH rips off wings: ask Boeing.

Other vids show a Photoshopped dark airliner-lookalike obliterating the object, but therefore still moving on the exact-same trajectory as Richard's singular "ball".

Google NASA X-planes for a cluster of balls

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

You have been caught lying again. No aeronautical engineers agree with your evil cult's uninformed guess that the plane's speed was, for some reason, impossible. Boeing does not agree with you. I asked. You didn't.

You still haven't explained why the experts are wrong about the impossibility of the sort real time compositing your fantasy depends on.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

We ARE aeronautical engineers: we've been building planes since 1955

Given elementary instruction, even your Rolex lookalike could allow you to calculate the 579MPH image velocity

(HINT known length of virtual Boeing ,

known width of real WTC2,

elapsed time on your watch)

Google: aeronautical data: V Max at Sea Level + 703 feet altitude, ANY jetliner.

But you're the expert, so I'll leave you to figure it out, if you can....

If you can't, who cares any more won?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Bullshit! You are an ignoramus parroting other crackpots. No-planers flogging their deranged fantasy back in 2006 and 2007 tried pretending that UA 175 couldn't CRUISE at 550 mph. Get it?--CRUISE. The plane wasn't cruising: it came out of a power dive and the hijacker pilot didn't care if he damaged it.

Your brain-dead "hints" are rubbish. Let us know when you and your fellow "aeronautical engineers" find a video analyst you can con.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck Simple solution: stop reading rubbish won. Success in power diving is for carrot-munching fighter pilot with good night vision by day.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

"No aeronautical engineers agree" may be correct as far as that quote goes... and the technicalities are way past a video-producer's limited comprehension... but your tech support will easily follow the simple discussions open-minded aeronautical types are sharing on the aerotech forum at

pprune org/archive/index.php/t-301390­.html

[MrAutobuildit]

Jesse and "Police State" were banned

This is the info all of your few followers and your good self need to check out

while it's leaked out once more. Before they pull it down, and believe your eyes, watch in horror, & with your last shred of common sense, before They

cart you to the gulag too

Don't think that being on Their side offers long-term

protection. They want all of US eventually.

Just ask Jesse

YT com/watch?v=aFBi8Pn1Nu4

Smart Hint: expand YT + add a dot

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

There is no "they." Your comic book super-villains don't exist. Jesse Ventura is a fraud and a liar. His show on 9/11 conspiracy theories was a disgrace. Not a single rational voice was heard, while charlatans and lunatics were showcased.

[wordgeezer]

Truth can be observed in absolute silence while the ignorant loudly proclaim their ill gotten opinions in a voice that offends even the dark forces whom they serve..G%

[RonaldWieck]

@wordgeezer

Speaking of the invincibly ignorant serving dark forces, what does your evil, mindless cult actually have? It's been ten years and you are all still anonymous trolls infesting the bowels of the internet. When will you produce something--anything-- that can stand serious scrutiny?

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

When will you lead the way won?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

I wonder what that gibberish means in English? Where is the way "won" supposed to be?

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Who knows won?

[kangtimelord]

Holy shit, there are two parts to this crap?!?!?

If he's an engineer, I'm Prince Zordar of the Comet Empire.

Whatta joke. This is freaking awful, yet hilarious.

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord You have a lousy SOH, Zordar. ...but FYI Richard Hall has provided very-high-tech engineering services at the very highest level for the bankster-financed companies: he has access to the way the Elites think and operate, and you would do yourself a favor (why should WE care?) if you watched what he has to say with a less-closed mind. Be warned tho: you might learn s-t Trust me, I'm an architect: no Boeing touched any of the Three Twin Towers...

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Why should we trust you? You are a proven liar who doesn't know what he's raving about.

Please explain why your imaginary conspiracy approved a plan that blamed the destruction of the towers on nonexistent planes yet staged the event during morning rush hour to maximize the number of eyewitnesses.

What if ONE amateur fails to showe a plane?

Tell us about my friends who saw the second plane hit the south tower.

More magic, sucker?

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

"Tell us about my friends who saw the second plane hit the south tower"

Your gratuitous insolence on this forum is so pathological won, Youtubers' is stretched way beyond our limits with a claim so ridiculous as your still having a friend, not even a solitary notebook-toting plane-spotter

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

My insolence is not gratuitous. I am slapping down ignorant liars promoting pernicious nonsense. I have many friends and three of them saw UA 175 hit the South Tower: one from the street below and two from their office windows. None of them are on record with their experiences. Perhaps your imaginary conspiracy paid them NOT to go public with their accounts?

What a pathetic, silly fraud you are.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

The ONLY people who've ever gone on record with detailed stories in The Media to SAY they saw planes hit anything on 9/11 were ALL provably connected with BigMedia and with the Other 9/11 PerpeTraitors (sp sic).

If you say those Conspirators are also your friends, I have absolutely no problem in believing you for once ;-) None at all.

If (y)our agreement gives you warm fuzzies for a change, enjoy the mintie moment.

Take care how you cope with it... if you can

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit Well put AB, Sean Murtagh, for one, a CNN executive, was the first, and was conspicuous in being first witness and for his wealth of detail. No wonder the corporate bankster cartel won't allow a real investigation. This is obviously a conflict of interest,,,G%

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

*hehe* "wealth of detail" indeed. yeah, the bankster "witnesses" were all reading from the same scripts the BigMedia newsreaders' repeated all freaking 9/11 day.

London reporter in NY, Jane Stanley, played the same dice....and her BBC autocue rolling half an hour ahead of schedule might have Plane-Huggers uncritically believing she's psychic.

Only thing that made her pseem pstupid was she later protesteth too much methinkth, as the Bard once psed. ;-)

IYSWIM

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit lol. it's a neoconservative trait, that even some of the limie's are afflicted with. I would be remiss, if I didn't mention...

Jane Berringer, BBC producer who saw a plane at WTC 2 on 911

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

Hey, thanks for that mighty upload WG.... I didn't realize Jane Standley (have I got her dad's name-spell right? first time today), didn't know Jane had BBC sisters Berringer and also NB Beresford.... and both names google only in relation to this assignment.

If you were to distract yourself (God Forbid) googling "Common Purpose" and "BBC" you'd find UK BigMedia infested with CP, an NGO at the highest Elite-Mandated level.

Keep posting your top vids: good work there

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

I checked yr upload: the description mentions one "Nisha Patai" and googling leads us to Nisha Pillai at

bbc co uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_36­20000/newsid_3624700/3624735.s­tm

(My super-dubious mind was wondering aloud if she was "Jane Berringer" at the opening of your video clip)

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit Woops, sorry about that, only two Janes... I'm glad about your super-dubious mind. I got the name wrong when I was writing the title and description. I've changed it on Youtube. Just happy that the video was ok,,,Thanks for the save.

Here is the source... WTC witness Jane Beresford saw 2nd plane, BBC, 09:20, 9/11

on 11septembervideos channel, lots of spiffy 911 stuff there.,,G%

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

As you were...au contraire mon frere as they say in Nice.... my point was that there are indeed lotsa 9/11 Janes flyin' at BBC.

We'd ALL come across Standley's famous scripted-prediction that Huggers explain by resorting to heavy weapons like lite WonWieck... but you were dead right about Berringer (new to me, but most things are new to me)... then I stumbled over ANOTHER Jane called Beresford.

That's when I wondered if (y)our gorgeous Nisha was just-a-Jane Lookalike

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard MrAutobuildit,

Architect? Your name Art Vandelay by chance, moron? Do me a favor, list all the skyscrapers you "designed", if any (likely none). In fact, list all the structures you've designed so that I may AVOID them. These structures would no doubt be so poorly designed as to be life threatening.

[kangtimelord]

This is not an "Analysis", this is "Shit"

[lovidayloviday]

most people don't want to believe this because then they'll start to question the army.. but some weird reason this resonates.. 

[MrAutobuildit]

@lovidayloviday

No disrespect to any of the heros who get volunteered to lay down their lives to fight the Elite's Illegal Middle-east Wars, but The Army and Co are the source of by FAR the greatest problem the US faces today.

You are now one of the real elite who understands ;-)

Tell your mates

[MrAutobuildit]

@lovidayloviday

Ooops.... I mix up my services.

It's almost certainly the Navy who were (ir)responsible for this "ball" that Richard D Hall postulates. In case you might otherwise make the mistake of thinking we Colonials are idiots, check Navy X-Planes on google.

I forget which of the X-plane type-numbers this "ball" most resembles.... but ALL of then are a fraction of the size of a Boeing 767... if you see what I mean... and how much I like Richard's analysis ;-)

[plkpg]

Please spend some time on something that really matters

[HammerX100]

What a load of Garbage, sure whoever heard of Muslim suicide bombers? It is always someone else. Some people are too blind to see what is in front of them, only a conspiracy would satisfy their tiny minds, it is quite sad in a way

[nssaxis]

Interesting stuff. I have seen "ufo's" in some of the footage and it seems to have only had a little attention. Did they also have these "ufo drones" circling to keep an eye on what was happening? A number of people have said the films are doctored, no planes etc. Atleast this guy puts some effort into explaining this point. Plane or no plane.. the 911 saga was sloppy, fake and done from inside 100%. Good post mate.

Peace out.

[zleetniadam]

it was a BOMB i think there is no ball and no plane..

[astralwalk]

@MrDumonti You think you saw that, such things as CGI technology exist.

[RonaldWieck]

@astralwalk

The sort of real time compositing your idiotic fantasy requires is not possible. But keep lying. Your evil cult has made so much progress in ten years.

[RonaldWieck]

This know-nothing idiot dismisses the thousands of eyewitnesses who SAW UA175 hit the SOuth Tower from their cars crossing East River Bridges, from their offices and apartments in Manhattan, from their rooftops in Brooklyn Heights, and from the streets surrounding Ground Zero.

The fool doesn't realize that Shack's rubbish has been totally destroyed by REAL video analysts. The sort of real time compositing this moron posits is not possible.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck I've just noticed you've had 5 months to answer this (only for yourself, understand.... I already know)

Have YOU personally interviewed ANY of these "thousands or eyewitnesses" to justify your statement that ANY one of them (let alone all of them) saw what you PRESUME they saw...?

Or are you reporting ONE statement (frequently repeated by those who don't check facts): "eyewitnesses saw UA175....etc"

ONE fact you might check: UA175 was OFFICIALLY still flying in 2005

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Three of my closest friends were eyewitnesses to the crash of UA 175 into the South Tower. It is NOT a fact that UA 175 was still flying in 2005. There was a time when I would explain the rather silly error you're making, but I no longer trouble myself. You WANT to parrot such rubbish. If you had any interest in facts, you could visit 911myths(dot) com.

Video compositing expert Steve Wright showed why the planes that crashed on 9/11 were not CGI.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

I did visit 911myths com but my Firefox browser displays faction designed to deceive. Don't trouble any longer. Steve Wright's video compositing expertise would ONLY be relevant if he can explain WHY the video producer went to some extraordinarily hyperthetical lengths to pixel-by-painful;-pixel PhotoShop an airliner hitting a glass wall, but to look like genuine fake.

He can explain only a virtual jetliner flies a measurable 215mph in one shot & 579mph the next

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

You're lying again. You haven't read a word of the invaluable discussions on 911myths.

Your total ignorance of video compositing is typical for a conspiracy liar. The sort of real time compositing your deranged cult posits is not possible. But don't let reality get in the way of your fantasies.

Steve Wright has many students. Unlike twoofers, they are capable of learning from an expert.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck Steve may have lotsa students... but can any of them complete my eddification by explaining WHY anybody would composite-video a real boeing hitting a glass building.... and have the resulting picture look like a very-badly photoshopped picture of an airplane-lookalike dissolving painlessly, no shattered glass, no aluminum plane parts flying? If the Boeing was real, you'd let the World see the crash

The Boeing was a real CGI, courtesy WesCam Systems, military version

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Nobody can edify you: you are ineducable. ALL the amateur videos show the same impact. Imagine--your imaginary super-villains concocted a plan that would fail if ONE amateur video showed something different.

Naturally, that terribly obvious consideration eluded you. It requires logic.

The 150-TON plane moving 500 mph does not CRASH into glass and perimeter columns. It slices through and gets chewed up inside the building.

Tell us why the experts are wrong.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck So, if I possessed your logic, my 150-ton plane would dissolve into the building without any glass being broken and all the wings and fins and engines and tail and underside pod and landing gear, that would all dissolve harmlessly too, right?

That myth would sure explain Steve's video fakery.

Real Boeings crash when contacting a skyscraper.

Trust me, I'm an architect. I design real buildings professionally.

I also design real airplanes. But that's just a hobby. ;-)

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

What a silly liar you are! Nobody thinks that the plane didn't break the windows it flew through.

Your lack of intelligence and technical background prevents you from reading the academic papers explaining the crash physics. Mackey's lecture is more accessible, but you are a twoofer: you cannot learn facts inconvenient to your fantasies.

Most likely, you are yet another angry kid. If you are an architect, let us hope your license is revoked.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck Hey, Ron. I've just watched your 2008 interview with SW and Ace Baker... you call Ace "insane" repeatedly, so calling me a liar is a badge of honor. Much appreciated.

As for Mr Wright's alleged expertise...NO vidcam "automatic gain control" ever caused fade-to-black . If Steve believes his AGC explanation, he's technically deficient. If he IS an expert, he was lying.

Ace was 100% correct: fade-to-black proves the Boeing nose-out lies..

Pinocchio's nose shows it

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Sorry, dunce, nobody thinks I repeatedly called Ace insane on the show. It didn't happen. You got caught lying again.

The no-planer asked if I had in the past called him insane and I acknowledged that I had.

Steve Wright does NOT believe the explanation he received from a technician he consulted. He believes that Kai Simonsen's explanation is probably correct. It doesn't matter in any case.

There was no "nose-out," just debris exiting the building.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

You are absolutely correct with

"The no-planer asked if I had in the past called him insane and I acknowledged that I had" ....

and your amazing word-for-word recall of what you said 3 years ago could prompt smart Youtubers to perceive exactly why you dodge every one of my contrarian questions.

No one correct answer would support your pontificating from a lofty Elitist pulpit

Excuse my wild assumption for years you've also volunteered to be amply rewarded by tPTB

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

What is amazing? I am a Life Master in the U.S. Chess Federation. I have an excellent, although not photographic, memory.

You lied when you claimed that I "repeatedly" called Ace insane during his debate with Steve Wright. Why not simply own up to your falsehood?

I have not dodged a single one of your disingenuous questions. You don't appreciate the answers as they are reality-based.

Too bad.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

My apparent "lie" was just-testing your memory. You excelled...

Don't dodge the question of how the Boeing hits the Pentagon yet the Pentagon takes half an hour before a small part of it falls.

(HINT: Exam candidates are aloud to personally consult the 9/11 Military Magician before answering this question)

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Gee, wouldn't it have been wonderful if structural engineers, crash investigators, fire safety experts, physicists, aeronautical engineers, computer programmers got together and analyzed the crash of AA77? They could have called their work, "The Pentagon Building Performance Report."

Oh, that actually happened?

And you never read a word of it?

Yup, you're a conspiracy liar.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Your report is fiction, Ron. Flight AA77 was canceled for the day.

What DID happen at thepentacon com was called The Smoking Gun.

Do NOT allow yourself to take a peek in public.

The military who failed to win a single Heart or Mind in Iraq will not appreciate losing yours at this late stage.

It will happen.... but in thye meantime, why not enjoy being as rude and objectionable as possible to the human merely beings that you are forced to share the Internet with

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

It isn't MY report, dunce. Nobody sane thinks that AA77 or AA11 was canceled. Even twoofers who are otherwise drooling idiots understand the BTS errors. Start reading on page 55:

scribd(dot)com/doc/36522545/Th­e-Hidden-History-of-9-11-2001

The CIT-heads are two of the dumbest frauds infesting the net. You have been conned by cretins.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Offering you the subtlest of compliments, Ronnie-me-lad:

If you weren't carrying such a huge hate-the-world chip on your shoulder, we might actually enjoy communicating. As it is, your myopic world view is closed, there's nothing more anybody can say you'd listen to.

The Military Magician cocked-up, the Pentagon gelignite failed, the Boeing flew over the rooftop, you blinked.

Open your eyes now, check

serendipity li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

Enjoy the sunshine, lad

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

The small problem here is that absolutely NOBODY saw the plane fly over the roof. Lots of people, by contrast, saw it hit the Pentagon.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Au contraire, mon frere: Citizen's Investigation Team's research totally reverses your assumption vimeo com/cit OR citizeninvestigationteam com

(Y)our large problem would be a congenital reluctance to accept testimony from ethnically-challenged witnesses whose christian faith would have them swearing on a book published by a pope whose divinity we might both share doubts about.

Or would you be overwhelmed with suspicion to find this genius agrees with you for once?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

There is no "team." The CIT-heads are two extremely dishonest idiots who peddle an insane fantasy. Their idea of an investigation is to ignore hundreds of eyewitness accounts inconvenient to the crapola they peddle and twist a tiny handful of accounts into supporting an incorrect flight path. ALL of their witnesses insist they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. They never explain why they refuse to speak with any of the first-responders or rescue workers.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Why now be positive, Ron.  Present company excepted, who is your HONEST idiot who's peddling a SANE fantasy?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

The thousands of real structural engineers, aeronautical engineers, physicists, metallurgists, fire safety experts, demolition professionals, crash investigators, air traffic controllers, coroners, and forensic examiners present findings that dovetail into ONE conclusion: 19 jihadists hijacked 4 planes and crashed 3 of them into buildings. The evidence for that conclusion is overwhelming. Evidence for conspiracy fantasies is nonexistent.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Your named one Steve W who turned out to be either a non-techie fraud or a liar. Who else feeds your fancy?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

No, I named Steve Wright, one of the biggest names in video compositing. Wright was brought to my attention by Ace Baker, who suffered a massive breakdown after he was exposed in the debate. Why do you loons feel the necessity to criticize people totally out of your league? You can't attempt any serious research because reality-based answers will necessarily conflict with your fantasies.

There is a reason why your deranged cult exists solely on the net.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

When Steve Wright appeared on your show he tried the Automatic Gain Control trick, and failed miserably (my Weston Mark 11 exposure meter hardly registered anything that would cause a camera diaphragm to move noticeably. (I've been filming since 1955, I learned that trick too). Fade to total black MUST be done manually .....

the only other option I'm sorry to say is that HE LIED.

If you know of the intermediate impossible, try smart typing.

HINT Wescam Military

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Steve Wright stated that his area of expertise was video compositing. I don't require hints from ignorant cranks.

For a full discussion, see the following JREF thread featuring several video professionals:

forums(dot)randi(dot)org/archi­ve/index.php/t-118665.html

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

I see a "randi" lurking in your link.... and as Jams Randi is considered the Ultimate Con, I'll stick to the Pilotsfor911Truth website you introduced me to... I am so-o-o impressed at their uncovering the fact that there's overwhelming evidence the Pentagon aircraft data is not from an American Airlines 757.

Thanks for the link... I hope you study it carefully too

pilotsfor911truth org/forum/index.php?showtopic=­­21149&hl=aa77

remember?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Yeah, you'll really make progress swallowing Balsamo's crapola. It's always a good idea to select a cowardly low-IQ psycho as your guru. The bogus pilots have uncovered NOTHING. Balsamo was destroyed by Warren Stutt's decoding of the last few seconds of AA77's FDR data. He's been posting as a woman ever since.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

OMG.... Sir Ronald.... oh, it's you! I'm so-o-o sorry.... and here I was confusing you with the other Wieck idiot. Yeah, all those other experts really are pathetic ignoramuses, aren't they. *hehe* They just don't realize there's only us two geniuses left.... and I'm not so sure about the other one.

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

A suggestion: when you have nothing to say, try saying nothing.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

helpguide org/life/humor_laughter_health­.htm

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Steve Wright prattled Automatic Gain Control in great detail talking ON YOUR tape, lad.

Steve either showed pathetic ignorance (which neither of us believes) OR he LIED ... because any video fakery expert like him would know the fade to black MUST be done under orders from Higher Authority.

Not even WesCam RealTime CGI insertion technology that the military deployed on 9/11/01 would have faded to black on auto.

The 9/11 video weapon was guided manually, squire.

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Silly liar, you have been exposed. I told you where to find accurate information about Ace's canard. You weren't able to comprehend the explanation or you didn't bother to look. In any case, it's YOUR problem. There was no "fade-to-black."

You know absolutely nothing about video analysis. Stop parroting nonsense concocted by other idiots.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Dear Sir, seated in my bathroom, your priceless example of profuse verbosity, temporarily in front of me, will immediately be posted behind me for ever

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit "profuse verbosity" I like that...Be careful about presenting wonald with any truth as he might be vewy angwey. I presume that you know about the cane... ( :

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

EVERYBODY who saw the plane became distracted by a trick poorly-performed by, let's call her, the Military Magician. Neither you nor I witnessed the Trick.

So why not kick back and enjoy Curious Psychology #1...you might find our first point of agreement here youtube com/watch?v=voAntzB7EwE (2 mins)

Your GrandMaster phrenology could win world-first observer status with Dr Wiseman's color changes, but only you will know.

Next: check the Pentagon Fireball Trick again

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Oh, the TRICK! And here I thought you didn't have a clue.

Well, that settles it. ALL those silly eyewitnesses who saw the plane hit the building and those air traffic controllers who tracked it to the Pentagon where it vanished from their screens and the first reposnders who picked up aircraft debris were fooled by the TRICK.

Now, we're getting somewhere.

If only those damned inconvenient phone calls made from AA77 could just sort of go away...

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Yeah, the TRICK, Ron-boy.

Did you really believe Mr David Copperfield when he told US that the jumbo had vanished.... or that Lady Liberty really DID had gone walkabout when he pulled back her veil and she had disappeared?

"Hundreds of my friends" saw Copperfield make the plane vanish: "hundreds of my friends" saw the Statue vanish: so if "hundreds of YOUR friends" are so thick they insist they saw a boeing hit the Pentagon....what show ever need a magician?

IYCWIM

[MrAutobuildit]

@MrAutobuildit

Oh... and sorry, lad. I didn't take a single call from AA77. Don't think I missed a damned thing either ...

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Parading your ignorance really doesn't help your evil cause. You frauds tend to dismiss the calls made from the hijacked planes because they are so terribly inconvenient to your nonsensical fantasy. But you can't wish them out of existence.

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

And hundreds of magicians know how Copperfield made the statue vanish. You don't have a point. The CIT-heads' appeal to magic is stupid. AA77 took off, was hijacked, crashed into the Pentagon, and everyone onboard died. Period.

When you offer a plausible alternate explanation for how AA77 was tracked on radar to the Pentagon, how the aircraft parts and human remains were found inside the Pentagon, and how the forensic examiners identified the remains, we can talk.

[MrAutobuildit]

AA77 was NOT tracked on radar, no parts from AA77 were found in the Pentagon, any bodies were listed as collateral damage (I'm not making this up) and forensic exams deal ONLY with what's on the morgue table.

By all means talk, lad

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Now you're reduced to outright lies. Trust me, the sane portion of the world doesn't care if an ignorant agenda-driven crank wants to insist that day is night and the sun is the moon. However much you want to pretend that AA77 wasn't tracked on radar, the incontrovertible fact is that it was. You can pretend that all the photos of debris are fakes, but you still have that problem of a conspiracy consisting of thousands of people who never leak anything.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck Detonators failed just as the Airforce Boeing flew THROUGH the Hollywood Studios Fireball

That's WHY the Pentagon facade showed NO impact damage whatsobloodyever, Ron. None, Zilch, Nada....

HOW the Magician cocked-up is OBVIOUS... Team-6 Seals 35 minutes took 35 mins to down a miniscule bit of building.

The result keeps YT files flowing with rhetoric from commentors who assume their jaded eyes see reality.

Now you know otherwise, Ron.

At last ;-)

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

You have been caught lying again.

Seek psychiatric help. Your word salad bores me.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

D'ya fervently hope your salad videos don't?

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Your friends from FBI scrambled to recover videotapes... but they failed to silence vital witnesses who have a horrible habit of blowing whistles after dark

Maestro Copperfield SUCCEEDED in making Liberty vanish from view

IF you BELIEVE that Liberty REALLY waltzed off Her podium, disappeared for a cuppa coffee and returned when David said-so, you'll believe Santa Claus rides a Harley

Even I know HOW Copperfield succeeded:

I also know HOW the 911 Magician FAILED

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

What "witnesses"? Wait--maybe we're talking about April Gallop. You know, the fraud who took a ton of money from Americasn Airlines, then tried pretending there was no plane. Do you think she intends to give back the money?

ROTFLMAO

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

April was right, there was no plane.... but why not link your readers to Ms Gallop's pay-in slip?.... or to some relevant AA doco that was not doctored by Barry's White House Photoshop

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Funny, her lawsuit was thrown out of court as frivolous and her shyster was fined. Do you think she'll return the money she took from American Airlines?



[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

"Now, we're getting somewhere".

Ron, Sir....you will only BEGIN to "get somewhere" with me or anybody else.... when you drop your congenital superiority and futile phony sarcasm, and indulge in some slight attempt, however incompetently, to relate with actual-real people by whatever remote quasi-human means the internet tolerates in the pontifical preaching your personality prefers.

End of Sermon

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

If not one of your contacts or concubines saw the Boeing flying away from the Pentagon, don't you think you might need to broaden your social life?

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

ABSOLUTELY NOBODY saw a Boeing fly away from the Pentagon. ABSOLUTELY NOBODY phoned into a talk show or wrote a letter-to-the-editor complaining that the plane did NOT hit the Pentagon.

You tend to overlook these tiny details.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

If your definition of sanity depends on cancelation of airline flights, call me insane... then check what happens if neither AA11 nor AA77 left the ground on 9/11/01

Treat this as fiction, for now, Ron. Small minds cannot stand too much shock... but when not if you realize that this fact is not open to interpretation and it IS what actually happened.... check the most unexpected 9/11 thin ever:

ALL the evidence then falls into place.

Improbable? Y

Impossible? N

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

It IS fiction. Nobody sane thinks that AA11 and AA77 weren't hijacked and crashed into their targets. The radar tracks PROVE what happened.

Face it--you were conned by idiots.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

....doubtless the same phony radar tracks your psyops-disinformation Insider friends manufactured in 2002 to try and distract US with "Flight of the Bumble Planes"?

public-action com/911/bumble.html

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Yeah, now the radar tracks are phony. Your imaginary comspiracy is getting a bit bloated, no? When I say "bloated," I mean "mathematically impossible." Thousands of people involved, but NOBODY spills the beans. Uh-uh.

You are citing yet another thoroughly debunked piece of bovine excrement. Why not learn some facts?

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

I tried again to digest your 911myths Losing Flight 77 link (yr comment traveled no further than my YT emailbox).... but I became distracted by the vastly more-plausible

"Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757"

I thought one could safely rely on the credibility of professional pilots at

pilotsfor911truth org/forum/index.php?showtopic=­21149&hl=aa77

but of course you don't absolutely have to agree with me.

Or with anybody else

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Ah, a Grand Master... the plot thickens.

We are sevenl moves at the end of the Game.

Both players know precisely what exact-last 7 moves We-the-Good-Guys make before you guys face Our checkmate.

Good Guys got this good with sheer persistence: we will carry on regardless. We're winning.

Do you chasps do the Decent Thing and Resign with Good Grace?

OR

Do you vainly hope We will lose the plot and Make a Miastike?

HINT 2: We purposely made one: we NEVER repeat an error.

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Nah, twoofies never repeat an error.

ROTFLMAO

Your evil cult has accomplished so much in ten years.

Oh, it hasn't accomplished a damned thing?

ALL of its stupid lies have been exposed?

Well, that's why you're an anonymous troll. If you had anything, you'd be rich and famous.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck I assume you have a hot line to the 911 MythMaster: could you please ask her to add my favorite 911 factuous myth to her list of things we liars need eddificating on.

Flights AA11 and AA77 were BOTH canceled (first time 4 years) according to the govt website database for the morning of 09/11/2001

The website was down for the week after Holmgren publicised this in April 2002.. even after the week was up, the evidence was still there

I lie, so check the myth yourself

[RonaldWieck]

@MrAutobuildit

Someone named Mike is probably not a female. The appropriate pronoun is "his," not "her."

No, AA11 and UA175 were most certainly NOT canceled on 9/11/01. Holmgren is quite mad.

Yes, you do lie and you are incredibly stupid.

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

It has been noticed in High Places that Ron-THE-Teacher avoided any attempt to answer a single one of Mike's 17 simply-intelligent and intelligently-concise questions.

You failed your Test, Teacher

[MrAutobuildit]

Teacher's aphorisms composited here for Youtubers' eddification "You're lying again. "Your total ignorance... is typical for a conspiracy liar. "You are ineducable. "What a silly liar you are! "Your lack of intelligence "You are another angry kid. "Sorry, dunce...reality gets in the way of your fantasies "You lie and you are incredibly stupid. Mike's in good company 'cos "Holmgren is also mad" but the late Gerard Holmgren ain't with us any longer: he can't defend Ron's animal cruelty

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck

Little Mike's School-of-Life End-of-Year 9/11-History Report Card sez and-I-quote

"Mike's General Knowledge this Term was a disgrace to US both.

I tried once.

Little Mike was trying two."

[MrAutobuildit]

@RonaldWieck Can I tell you, that for me our exchanges here on YT have had the exact-opposite effect of what you APPEAR to want to achieve.

Thanks for exposing evidence of your obscure modus operandi.

NOBODY goes to the enormous extent of fronting the vids you produce, no otherwise-sane person so deviously avoids questions raised on such a serious topic... unless there's a hidden agenda to motivate you.

Power reverts to the People come December: are you with US or with Them?

[Warriorwales]

It's hypothesis to those that quickly jump the gun to Psyop. True rational being that does not believe the bullshit mainstream officials story are allowed to have hypothesises to then work out what went on or try and force the holders of the information to release it, by investigating to get the truth.

[Warriorwales]

@Warriorwales And to skymooood thank you for putting this up. Great channel.

[dreadnaught2]

Witnesses saw planes. Say that twice, look into the mirror and say "I am a troofer, and its ok"....now go back to school. You are welcome

[gordonculp]

@dreadnaught2 well what would you consider truth?



[dreadnaught2]

@gordonculp --seriously, the opposite of what 9-11 truth says .....if no planes on 9-11, then it is up to the accuser to explain how hundreds of thousands saw the second strike.

[MrAutobuildit]

@dreadnaught2 .... and where's YOUR actual evidence of the "hundreds of thousands"?

To use your style of hype, hundreds of thousands might have planted the same sort of post CLAIMING to see a strike... but the EVIDENCE challenges this. When you look at 9/11 disinformation elsewhere... come back to Richard Hall's HUGE question about why the 9/11 MORNING TV newscast didn't show any plane, but the evening newscast had a plane inserted?

Was the first showing a fake, or the second?

[dreadnaught2]

@MrAutobuildit ...lol,you are just as stupid as Hall then, that is all you have proved.

[MrAutobuildit]

@dreadnaught2

I even read "The Science of Man's Stupidity" believe it or Ripley no, so I agree I am stupid, too

But you're smart, so where IS any actual evidence of the "hundreds of thousands"?

Or even ONE person who saw a real plane hit on of the Three Twin Towers.

(You are aware of the Third Tower?  Did hundreds of thousand see a boeing heading for the Salomon Building that day?

Nah...Thought not....

I rest my case.

No Planes: discover the fact for yourself.

I had to ;-)

[ManlyMadi8]

Psyop

[ManlyMadi8]

I've got some ocean front property in Arizona you can buy :)

[FRTothus]

The only thing close to live feeds that day were from the helicopters, but even that film is suspect. There is another 'clear day' clip that shows no "blob', but there can definitely be seen a much smaller object disturbing the air as it moves along that path, and is most likely a drone/cruise missile. The "blob" is super-imposed over that. 9/11 was an exercise in deception to go to war, right out of the Naval War College manual. Lee Harvey Oswald-bin Ladin false flag.

[existenceisfake]

This is some of the worst, most easily debunked piece of dis-info to ever disgrace the internet. Please delete it. Do the right thing. Consider the children.

[WTCdemolitions]

Please delete. Thanks!

[skymooood]

@WTCdemolitions And who is this bty? Did it hurt little?

[DomcheckProduction]

UFO ball nonsense. Why ?

1) we saw exactly this footage without the ball first.

2) no one eyewitness saw a ball

3) the flash of the first strike was probably not a ball

4) In real was the object about 560 mp/h

5) The object flew a curve

[jelinto]

You lost me at 1:12. September Clues??? Really?

You spent much of the first minute trying to convince everyone how smart you are, then you go and praise September Clues as a excellent film.

September Clues has been debunked a long time ago.

watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

watch?v=ZORr-hfz-E4

watch?v=5bNomV_8034

Time to give this shit a rest.

Why should REAL truthers have to fight the debunkers AND dimwits like you?

Or are you a PSYOP agent purposely muddying the waters of debate?