He's angry because he doesn't understand his sexuality so lashes out at what he believes is the reason he feels outcasted. He had no real argument. The paradox is if you get spiritual you can have these questions answered. Personally i'm a Darrryl Anka fan and although there are many fakes out there the phenomenon is real.
Personally, I don't believe in a god or religious entities or whatever, but I keep that to myself. Just because I can't see it or explain and understand it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
There is no god. When you die there is nothing. Just like before you are born, you are not aware of anything because you do not exist anymore. You are worm food.
Can you see the guy who doesn't believe in god, i think his idea is quite childish and old, boring. You dont need to be a phsycologist to understand his anger, the way he talks, full of deep anger :)) Most scientists says, most scientists cant cure the most of diesase or inventions, so at that point how can you say there is no god?? Our sciense and technology not that perfect or solved everything!! And if something created all those order in universe, we are just walkin in small steps to discove
Derek Acorah like all other mediums doing this for fame and fortune are utter fakes google "proof that most haunted is set up" This man and the other leeches like him should be locked up for preying on the most emotionally vulnerable and gullible in our society.
"You can't see it, you can't touch it, you can't smell it but you still don't know!"
Imagine using this logic in a murder trial?
"There's no evidence, no witnesses, the suspect wasn't even at the scene of the crime at the time of the alleged murder - but I've still got a feeling that he's the killer. Lock him up and throw away the key!"
in short his role here was as the superficial human tape recorder. he had nothing original or intelligent to say at all and couldnt even keep on point for his two minutes of screen time. very amateur.
even though derek the most laughable conman, louis savva is really just parroting his favourite people here - obviously penn and teller, dawkins, hitchens, maybe randi. He's recycling well worn arguments in this debate that we've heard from more prominent atheists and likely his heroes. even gave a shout out to his fave tv show.
I love how there are numerous comments here debating about the argument that has been going on for centuries about how we are all here - whether we have a creator and a Lord who is our father and watches over us......
I need to decide whether I want to be a celebrity 'spirit medium' or a celebrity 'atheist'. There seems to be loads of money to be made in telling people that they're right whilst being as offensive as you want.
louie savva is wrong when he states most scientists claim there is no god as most scientists do not claim that, the reason most scientists don't claim that s because there is no proof to say there is no god just as theres no proof to say there is so most scientists don't have a view on god either way really and just get on with their work. louie is just taking this oppotunity to make people agree with him by attacking derek where there are real reasons to attack derek
he is a shameful fake, however there is no proof of there being no god. louie savva is pathetic in a debate. you can't come on a show and just insult people on subjective matters. calling something childish does not make any less real. he has obviously never studied philosophy, psychology and the falsification principle. if he had that education he would have created valid arguments against spiritualism
The guy starts his arguement badly by saying their is now god or afterlife, as no scientist on the planet can prove one way or the other. I suppose you could call me agnostic, but I do think we are a lot further behind in terms of discovering a theory of everything than even Stephen Hawking would like to believe. If we discover what caused the infinitesimal nothingness which caused the big bang, that only leads on to the question - Where did 'nothing' come from? Acorah is a fake though.
Louie savva sucks a mean dick! I can't stand Derek either but don't dissrespect Christian people! God means different things to different people! For me it's a higher power/spirit. Louie is narrow minded. People only get mad at things they don't understand. Dereks a cunt for claiming people bring about their afflictions themselves. All bollocks.
his obviously never lost someone he loved then. when you loose some one you love you can't help but hope you will see them again and that death isn't the end because you can't just accept you will never see them again.
Louie Savva - what a great guy! Few people have the balls to tell it like it is & expose the bull Derek Acorah spouts. Don't people KNOW he was caught out making up spooky rubbish which was presented to him as historical fact? It was ALL fiction & yet he insisted he discovered it psychically! If he had any decency he would give up this game but people keep on paying him for it so he carries on regardless!
So by believing in god and the afterlife you must also believe in santa, the tooth fairy and unicorns yeah right because you can or cannot prove they exist!!!! get a grip on your own lives and stop clinging to omnipotent white haired guys floating around on clouds and killing and destroying in his own name? god is for old people and others that have no grip on their own lives, sort it out
Leave the man alone, so he is not a graeat orator. That doesn't make him a cun*t. So he can't debate, so he can't proove the afterlife does not exist. Imbecile, imagine falling short of proof on that one? Kill him. And more.
Mr Savva, you've somehow managed to make clairvoyance and religion both look reasonable and inoffensive. That really takes some doing.
Good work, dickhead. Now leave the atheism and sceptism to those of us who can articulate a rational position and a logical argument without sounding like a 10 year old who's just received a chemistry set for Christmas.
the people who believe in God, afterlife, and heaven are being irresponsible because they are essentially diverting resources and attention away from scientists who are trying to develop biotechnology to make people healthy and alive indefinitely, and build a heaven on earth.
Come on people!... It's clear the mudpit & lightning created the millions of creatures that has ever lived on earth. I mean, how can we not believe something so obvious as that!? The guy on the screen clearly knows there's no afterlife, as he must've died & come to life so he can confirm it for sure...Jeeesh!
I have to say louie does not demonstrate much intelligence by saying simply that there is no god nor heaven simply because in the same respect a good scientist does not say ye or nay to a thoery before it has been proven or disproven the truth is he is just another close minded person he could never make a scientist or any person involved in any kind of debate to him his preference is law and his appearance in this debate is worthless
Louie Savva - what a bitter little c***t. He doesnt even practice parapsychology anymore. I always hated him and his "mightier than thou" attitude. Prick.
Does God exist? I don't Know. Does God not exist? I don't know. So, I will continue questioning with an open mind, free of prejudice. I will look at everything with an open clear mind, drawing no premature conclusions. Sadly, Louie Savva doesn't approach life like this, he seems to already have all the answers, he knows already that God does not exist.... How very immature and ignorant of him. That is not to say I am on Dereks side, he is indeed a conman, and gives real spirituality a bad name
There is a saying that comes to mind here, "The man who thinks he knows doesn't know. But the man who knows he doesn't know knows." - What this means is, an open mind is like flowing water, it never grows stale. But a closed mind is like a closed bottle of still, non flowing, water, stagnant, stuck and stale. A mind free from prejudice will intuit truth more clearly than a mind full of prejudice, arrogance, and hate.
Both of these men are ignorant. It is like watching too brain dead zombies have an argument. The intelligent mind knows to draw NO conclusions without evidence. Louie, I'm sorry to say but there is no evidence to prove god doesn't exist, just as there is no evidence that he does exist. You have to be open minded to all possibilities in life, for life is a mystery. Even scientists have admitted that they cannot say god does not exist. Even Albert Einstein was open to the idea of a God existing!
@deelo79 The burden of proof is upon those making the claim that God does exist. As an atheist it is not my responsibility to prove that God doesn't exist only to justify my lack of beleif, which is easily done. I believe Louie got it wrong as he went on the attack and isolated himself from the audience. He could have ridiculed Derek Acorah by asking questions to allow him to trip himself up. Derek Acorah is a con-artist who prays on the guillable and should never be given air time.
@deelo79 Oh and also, life isn't really a mystery. Scientists have a very thorough explaination of the biological processess that constitute life. From its origins (abiogenisis) to how life flourished when it got started (evolution) their understanding is pretty concise. I appreciate there may be gaps in their knowledge but they are constantly refining our understanding in the discovery of new evidence.
@soulfunkcity So are you saying that you believe everything you are told by modern day priests (scientists) who throw many fancy words and theories your way and you happily accept them without thinking for yourself? I don't claim to know more than you or less than you. However, the difference between me and you is that you choose to label yourself (just like religious people, who you seem to dislike), you choose to follow a belief, and conclude things that you yourself cannot prove.
@soulfunkcity "Life isn't really a mystery" -- that has to be the most ignorant and arrogant things anyone can ever say. Even a true scientist would disagree with you (I'm not talking about those dogmatic scientists, I talking about true scientists, who have open minds to all possibilities.) The very reason scientists do what they do is because they are inspired by the mystery of existence. Even if the "theory" of evolution is true, that isn't an end all answer!
@deelo79 when I said 'life isn't really a mystery' I mean we have discovered alot. I am not saying there are not any gaps in our understanding. I am not ignorant to how far the scientific method has developed our understanding. You on the other hand seem to think that scientists ('modern day priests' - in your words, which really does display your ignorance) somehow make it up as they go along and that 'theories' are plucked from thin air. A theory is a model best describing a myriad of facts!
@soulfunkcity You clearly did not read my comments. There is a great deal of arrogance in the field of science, but yes, there is a great deal of scientists who are open minded and have indeed made incredible discoveries and have greatly advanced our understanding of nature. What I am against, is when people say that something doesn't exist without showing any evidence. God could very well exist, and I think it is foolish to just jump to the conclusion that it doesn't. That only births dogma.
@deelo79 Scientists and religious people have been arguing for years and years over this, and it is such a waste of energy. The only good argument is one that comes to an eventual understanding and cooperation. Albert Einstein even got frustrated over the childish arguing between science and religion, when he stated that "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - When I was a kid I was taught to talk to others instead of argue with them and fight with them.
@deelo79 - What Einstein meant by his statement was this, science without spirituality is lacking in full understanding, and spirituality without science is also lacking in full understanding. It is as Bruce Lee said, "You must bring natural response and control together to create perfect harmony, because, if you have one to the extreme, you become unscientific, but if you have the other to the extreme, you become a mechanical man." - The middle path is the ultimate path of true understanding.
@deelo79 if you want to quote Einstein, lets go for this one: 'It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.' Quote mining gets you know where. its an argument from authority.
@soulfunkcity I respect what science does, and have achieved, but it has no authority over me. I am free to see things and question things in my own free way. Science likes to cut things open, and take things apart, in the hope that it will learn the secrets of nature. But science cannot reveal the soul, the essence of existence cannot be cut open and taken apart.
@deelo79 you are asserting that a soul exists. That is a faith based position. As i have also said previously in our discussion, I am also open to the possibility of God existing but personally do not believe it. Look you either believe or disbelieve, there is no default position. Saying 'I don't know' doesn't address the question as we are not talking about absolute knowledge. You strike me as a theist who is in the closet. You keep talking about spirituality and the soul.
@soulfunkcity I disagree with you, there is a third position on things, you don't have to believe or disbelieve, you can stand on the middle path which draws no judgement or fixed conclusions. The middle path is the living path, what I mean by that, is that it is fluid, forever moving forward just like the moment which never stands still, but is in a constant flow, adapting to every change. If you believe in something, you block yourself, and if you disbelieve in something, you block yourself.
@soulfunkcity Words mean what you want them to mean, when I say that I am open to the soul existing, I'm am not asserting or believing that it exists, I am simply acknowledging that it is a possibility that has not yet been proven or disproven. So to choose to conclude it either way would be a terrible mistake, and so, I say this, instead of ignoring it, and concluding it, lets investigate it further until we find an answer.
@deelo79 Also I fundimentaly disagree that words just mean whatever you want them to mean. If that was the case communication would not be possible. I think I understand what you are getting at but I still disagree. You seem to be deluding yourself. Maybe your afraid of the truth, i suppose I will never know, I don't know you personally.
@soulfunkcity The word soul, to me, has no definitive meaning, after all, it is just a word we give to something that we cannot explain. In a way, the soul is a form of energy, that gives us life, and which disappears when we die. It might live on after death, or it might not live on after death, no one knows. So, I will never conclude as to whether it exists or not, as I have no right to say, because I do not know. Therefore, again, I am open to either possibility.
@deelo79 thanks for the discussion. I'm done now. i can see there is no point in it continuing as neither of us are going to budge. I think you are playing with words. You seem to be saying that everything is subjective, none of these words actually mean anything and you are happy just to redefine them so that you are comfortable. I just don't view the world the way you do.
@soulfunkcity I thank you also for the discussion. Even though we didn't come to an understanding, it was a pleasure exchanging comments with you. I will say this, if you look at the history of language and words, many words over time have taken on different meanings, or, there meanings expand due to our greater understanding of what the word is referring to. Words and language can evolve, and should evolve.
@soulfunkcity Take the word 'Atom' for instance. When the atom was first discovered we knew very little about it, but as scientists studied it over the years, they learnt more and more about it. So even thought the word 'atom' stayed the same, the understanding of the atom changed. This, to me, can also be applied to words like "Soul", although the word doesn't change, the understanding of what it actually is might change as we learn more about it. Anyway, it was nice hearing your views.
@soulfunkcity One thing I avoid is labels. Labels hold you back, they are restricting and segregate you form others. The only label I am comfortable wearing is that I am a human being, who wants to look at everything and be open to everything with a completely open and clear mind. I've always believed in cooperation and communication, rather than competition and conflict, which labels tend to cause.
@soulfunkcity YES, Einstein didn't "BELIEVE" in a personal God, but he was spiritual, and open minded to the possibility of a consciousness behind the order, design, and complexity of the universe. In fact, Einstein hated atheists using him to prove there is no God, because he NEVER backed such a claim!! He simply did not believe in a personal God, HE WAS OPEN MINDED, as all scientists should be! If your mind is closed to anything, it will become stuck and rigid, no longer fluid and open.
@soulfunkcity I am not ignorant, ignorance can not exist in a mind which is open to all possibilities. Ignorance is born from minds which draw immature conclusions. I know there is a certain amount of arrogance within the field of science as I have witnessed first hand being displayed in many articles and debates, but it is not science, it is down to the individual. Organised religion is worse for dogma, I totally agree. However, that does not mean that a God, or Creator, doesn't exist.
@soulfunkcity Ignorance is born when one chooses to ignore something. I do not agree with organised religion, but, I am able to see the value within sacred spiritual texts, which have been greatly abused and misunderstood by most religious people. For instance, if you judge the bible without first reading it, that is ignorance, for you are judging something based on nothing.
@deelo79 You are misrepresenting Scientists. I really don't understand why you have come to the conclusion that they are arrogant? There are many scientists who believe in God, as well as the ones who do not. Scientists are open minded, they have to have a certain degree of humility, for we are constantly increasing our understanding of nature . No one knows with absolute certainty that there is not a God but the reasonable approach is to doubt everything which has not be proven.
@deelo79 I agree that sacred spiritual texts have value. There are some positive teachings, as well as others which are fundimentally immoral (and those tend to be ignored). When it comes to the argument over Gods existence,the burden of proof is upon the person making the claim. i.e. If you tell me that you have green fairies at the bottom of your garden, then the default position is that i would not believe you and it is up to you to provide the evidence.
@soulfunkcity I agree with you that proof is always needed in order to find the truth. And yes, there is no evidence to say that there is a God, but there is also no evidence to say that there isn't a God. Even the theory of evolution does not prove that there is not a God. Even Darwin was open to the existence of a God, or consciousness behind the design of nature and evolution.
@deelo79 and may I also add, the theory of evolution does not set out to prove the existence of God. The theory of evolution explains how life has flourished once it got started and accounts for the diversity in nature. You really need to research a little bit more before you start ranting on. Even if Darwin was open to the possibility of God... so what? that doesn't mean anything. I am also open to the possibility, even though I find it highly unlikely,i'm nt saying I know for sure no one does.
@soulfunkcity You once again misunderstood my comment, I did not say that the theory of evolution set out to prove the existence of God, I simply stated that it does not disprove the existence of a God or of a conscious intelligence behind the design of existence. The reason I made the original comment is because many people use the theory of evolution as a way of discounting the existence of God, which makes no sense at all, as it does not prove that God does not exist!
@soulfunkcity You are right, I am not disagreeing with you, evidence is always needed to prove something exists, all I am saying is, just because that evidence has not yet been found, does not mean that we should suddenly jump to the conclusion that God does not exist! I think it is unscientific to jump to conclusions, and to argue and ridicule. It is always better to discuss intelligently all possibilities, whether they are provable or unprovable.
@deelo79 To say I think it is very unlikely that God exists without evidence to support that unlikeliness, is like a judge in a court room saying to the accused, "even though there is no evidence to support the claim that you committed a crime, I personally think you did, therefore you will go to prison for life." - Surely it is better to put it this way. Does God exist? I don't know. Does God not exist? I don't know, so, let's find out. Instead of saying, God existing is highly unlikely.
@deelo79 is like a judge in a court room saying to the accused, "even though there is no evidence to support the claim that you committed a crime, I personally think you did." i'm afraid its nothing like that because someone would not be in court unless there is reasonable evidence against them. There is reasonable evidence to come to the conclusion that God does not exist without knowing absolutely. I personally lack a belief in a God as the claim has failed to meet its burden of proof.
@soulfunkcity Every question answered only raises more questions. The most developed science remains a continual becoming. The rational approach starts from the idea that everything is explainable and that mystery is in some sense the enemy. This means that it prefers pejorative, and even wrong, answers to admitting its own lack of understanding.
@deelo79 Science is adaptable with the addition of new evidence, it is refined to provide us with the best possible understanding of nature and the laws which govern it. Completely the opposite of say, religion, which is dogmatic and unchanging. Scientists do not presume that everything is explainable, that is a straw-man fallacy, you are misrepresenting their position. They conclude that the scientific method is the most reliable and accurate method we have for understanding nature.
@deelo79 Scientists are the first to admit if something is wrong, why do you think scientific journals are peer reviewed? Sorry but you should really do a little more research. If you think that the Science is done in a dogmatic and arrogant fashion then you really have no idea how the Scientific method works. It is humble in the sense that any theory worth its salt shall stand up to careful scrutiny by being tested and repeated by other Scientists, that's how the peer review process works.
@soulfunkcity "Oh and also, life isn't really a mystery. Scientists have a very thorough explaination of the biological processess that constitute life. From its origins (abiogenisis) to how life flourished when it got started (evolution) their understanding is pretty concise." - This does not take away the mystery, this is only an understanding of part of the mystery of existence, and even then, it is still a mystery, for what drives it? What is the essence behind the movement?
@deelo79 Why do you presume there has to be something driving it? you're going all aesoteric and meta physical now. Your answers are loaded with presuppositions that you can't seem to see beyond. Actually it does take away the myster as our understanding starts to unravel that which was once unknown to us. Life is very well understood, now if you are talking about what was before that, then we are not discussing life anymore, rather something else. What exactly are you getting at?
@soulfunkcity I presume nothing, I merely am open minded to all possibilities. You presume there is no God or conscious creator! Let me put it to you as simply as I can (even though I have tried several times already, you clearly keep misunderstanding my comments) Here it goes - I am open to all possibilities, that includes the existence of a consciousness behind the creation of the universe aka God. Now, LET ME BE CRYSTAL CLEAR, I DO NOT BELIEVE IN A GOD, I AM SIMPLY OPEN TO THE POSSIBILITY!
@soulfunkcity "BELIEVING" in something is to conclude something based on zero evidence, that includes the belief that a God does not exist, that is a presumption, as there is ZERO evidence to support such a claim. BELIEVING is concluding, whereas, being OPEN MINDED TO POSSIBILITIES, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF A CONSCIOUS CREATOR is very different from BELIEVING, as it is open to any possibility, are we clear now?
@soulfunkcity You might have an issue with the idea of a consciousness behind the creation of the universe, but I don't. Even if it was proven that a God doesn't exist, I would be absolutely fine with that, so don't start thinking that I am a nut who is desperate for a God to exist, I am merely free of prejudice towards ideas, I am OPEN MINDED, not CLOSED MINDED.
@soulfunkcity And btw, I can quote who I like thank you very much, and yes, Einstein wasn't religious, you missed the point behind his statement, he was open minded to spirituality and to consciousness. I have read a lot about Einstein thank you very much, and I have even read interviews which were conducted with Albert Einstein in which he states that he does not believe in a personal God, but, that he is OPEN MINDED to the POSSIBILITY of the existence of a consciousness behind creation.
I don't like either of them, but louie savva? Saying "there is no god there is no afterlife" how fucking arrogant are you? You think everyone who believes in god is an idiot?
I actually disagree with everything Acorah says and does. That doesn't prevent me thinking that this savva character seems ghastly. Unable to put his views forward without acting arrogant, aggressive and childish.
i agree that derek is a fraud, but Louie went way to far. i dont believe in god or an afterlife but its certainly not childist if you do believe in them, everyone can have their opinion and i completly respect that, i hate people who force religon or non-religion onto others, its THEIR choice. having different opinions is not a bad thing, if we all had the same ideas and believe, we would all be identical, and wheres the fun in that? x
@buxomyankee What if you choose the wrong God to believe in? Or are all the Gods the right Gods? Plus if there is no God wouldn't you have wasted a lot of years praying and going to church etc.?
if you want to know the truth, If ghosts really exist? Please join us on our journey, we are 2 men on a mission all alone. We have done 16 episodes in the most scariest places in England so far and you can watch everything on our website and youtube channel,
Please subscribe to our youtube channel if you are interested in the paranormal.
He's not a prick. It's good to have people that will approach the ridiculousness of religion head on rather than dance around it like the majority of non-believers do.
This is like a priest standing in front of a church and saying that atheists and all other sinners will be doomed to an eternity of hell, the only difference being that Louie Savva is saying that all followers of religion, psychics and what have you are doomed to a lifetime of idiocy.
People believe in God and others don't, it's something that will never be proven, don't be such an asshole to say heaven is childish when you don't know any of the wiser!
He's my hero. He's awesome, tell em straight. Use your brains stop thinking theres some all powerful being just because your to lazy to think of something logical!!!!
Prick or not, he has a point. Sometimes to get your' point across you have to be blunt even if it does offend others. Also, there's tons of evidence that it's all fake, so the presenter is chatting shit when he says 'you don't know for sure'. Those who don't are those in denial.
ppl choose parkinson's? Derek is disgusting AND an emotional predator.
Y do ppl get their undies in such a wad over religion?? Either believing or not believing... If there were no religion, just think how happy the world would be. Naw... we'd have to find something else to fight about. Louie is right tho in that if you do not believe in God, then how to believe the rest of this garbage? It requires a multitude of spurious nested and interlinked suppositions.
dereck is the only scouser id trust why would dereck con people hes said in the past a good medium would give you a reading and not charge you a penny
Stupid atheist. By being an unrelenting prick all you do is alienate others and this undermines your position. There was no need to bring in atheism in order to show this Derek character is a fraud. You don't win people over by being an asshole.
i'm not religious but not atheist either. there are greater forces out there other than ourselves but a man sitting on a cloud with a white beard and greek sandles doesn't sound likey.
i just would love to see derren brown and dawkins to rip derek apart with questions
mattyhu23 3 weeks ago
He's angry because he doesn't understand his sexuality so lashes out at what he believes is the reason he feels outcasted. He had no real argument. The paradox is if you get spiritual you can have these questions answered. Personally i'm a Darrryl Anka fan and although there are many fakes out there the phenomenon is real.
Mr4737carlin 4 weeks ago
@Mr4737carlin No the phenomenon is not real, it's backed by no scientific evidence and was fully debunked nearly one hundred years ago.
ozmonster1989 2 weeks ago in playlist best comedy clips
Louie Savva farts in this video lol
lovemusic2187 1 month ago
I think this guy got a bad reading on his last visit to a Clairvoyant...That's why he's angry lol!
TheSadieCrush 1 month ago
What a over opiniated, badly raised little cunt!
lifeguard2564 1 month ago
Nolan is like an Irish version of Bill O'Reilly
Heathentribes 2 months ago
arsehole
jonovips 2 months ago
Personally, I don't believe in a god or religious entities or whatever, but I keep that to myself. Just because I can't see it or explain and understand it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
iWolfrost 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no god. When you die there is nothing. Just like before you are born, you are not aware of anything because you do not exist anymore. You are worm food.
Wyley123 2 months ago
this idiot gives atheists a bad name
Richy14332 2 months ago 11
Can you see the guy who doesn't believe in god, i think his idea is quite childish and old, boring. You dont need to be a phsycologist to understand his anger, the way he talks, full of deep anger :)) Most scientists says, most scientists cant cure the most of diesase or inventions, so at that point how can you say there is no god?? Our sciense and technology not that perfect or solved everything!! And if something created all those order in universe, we are just walkin in small steps to discove
lugerozz 2 months ago
Acora and Nolan are both cunts.
paulpizzey1973 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Derek Acorah like all other mediums doing this for fame and fortune are utter fakes google "proof that most haunted is set up" This man and the other leeches like him should be locked up for preying on the most emotionally vulnerable and gullible in our society.
frankinmouse 2 months ago
"You can't see it, you can't touch it, you can't smell it but you still don't know!"
Imagine using this logic in a murder trial?
"There's no evidence, no witnesses, the suspect wasn't even at the scene of the crime at the time of the alleged murder - but I've still got a feeling that he's the killer. Lock him up and throw away the key!"
rophnpwaul 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Derek Acorah is fake fake fake
TiaPebbles 2 months ago
1:44 - Haa the text mesage: "Hi Derek, how am I?"
fabregas213 3 months ago 2
אדם מסכן וקטן שכמוך
ODEL00 3 months ago
gosh Louie well done for having such balls : )
LionmaneElsie08 3 months ago
fair play to him, he's been at it for 15-20 years.
HopkinsXD 3 months ago
in short his role here was as the superficial human tape recorder. he had nothing original or intelligent to say at all and couldnt even keep on point for his two minutes of screen time. very amateur.
carpet691 3 months ago
even though derek the most laughable conman, louis savva is really just parroting his favourite people here - obviously penn and teller, dawkins, hitchens, maybe randi. He's recycling well worn arguments in this debate that we've heard from more prominent atheists and likely his heroes. even gave a shout out to his fave tv show.
carpet691 3 months ago
derek has been caught out so many times its laughable and he's still getting away with this shit people are still giving him their money
mcdinkity 3 months ago
I love how there are numerous comments here debating about the argument that has been going on for centuries about how we are all here - whether we have a creator and a Lord who is our father and watches over us......
And yet the top comment is about farting.
Leanashe23 3 months ago
I need to decide whether I want to be a celebrity 'spirit medium' or a celebrity 'atheist'. There seems to be loads of money to be made in telling people that they're right whilst being as offensive as you want.
taxiride1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FREE PORN AND GAMIN GURU PUSSY. CHECK MY CHANNEL!
EverSayTether 3 months ago
I appreciate this guy's honesty
KillMrFist 3 months ago
What a guy thankyou Louie Sawa.
246scully 3 months ago 2
But Gods Real!
nikeykid13 3 months ago
Some1 Needed To Tell Derek What Real People Think!
Derek's A FAKE.
nikeykid13 3 months ago
What a W@*k3r.
to0c0ol 3 months ago
louie savva is wrong when he states most scientists claim there is no god as most scientists do not claim that, the reason most scientists don't claim that s because there is no proof to say there is no god just as theres no proof to say there is so most scientists don't have a view on god either way really and just get on with their work. louie is just taking this oppotunity to make people agree with him by attacking derek where there are real reasons to attack derek
stevep119 3 months ago
What an ignorant man :o
malteeaser101 3 months ago
''The Christian community is a cult.'' Well said that man.
Zed1967 3 months ago
he is a shameful fake, however there is no proof of there being no god. louie savva is pathetic in a debate. you can't come on a show and just insult people on subjective matters. calling something childish does not make any less real. he has obviously never studied philosophy, psychology and the falsification principle. if he had that education he would have created valid arguments against spiritualism
kahuna3901 3 months ago
he is a shameful fake, however there is no proof of there being no god.
kahuna3901 3 months ago
How shameful and vile!
Sereena111 4 months ago
Comment removed
ferretmaster22 4 months ago
Comment removed
ferretmaster22 4 months ago
The guy starts his arguement badly by saying their is now god or afterlife, as no scientist on the planet can prove one way or the other. I suppose you could call me agnostic, but I do think we are a lot further behind in terms of discovering a theory of everything than even Stephen Hawking would like to believe. If we discover what caused the infinitesimal nothingness which caused the big bang, that only leads on to the question - Where did 'nothing' come from? Acorah is a fake though.
meldme 4 months ago
Louie savva sucks a mean dick! I can't stand Derek either but don't dissrespect Christian people! God means different things to different people! For me it's a higher power/spirit. Louie is narrow minded. People only get mad at things they don't understand. Dereks a cunt for claiming people bring about their afflictions themselves. All bollocks.
bumpyjason 4 months ago
MARY LOVES COCK
axelstoner 4 months ago 3
Heh heh, that Louie is a dick.
brandt19699 4 months ago
his obviously never lost someone he loved then. when you loose some one you love you can't help but hope you will see them again and that death isn't the end because you can't just accept you will never see them again.
LOUISECHECK 4 months ago
This is great. Morons who are dumb enough to be fooled by "mediums" or stories of "after-lives" need all the ridicule they can get! : )
winterstellar 4 months ago
god derek is soo full of bull !
amazinghannah1 4 months ago
Louie Savva.... an absolute knob head
susannahmoon291 5 months ago
Louie Savva - what a great guy! Few people have the balls to tell it like it is & expose the bull Derek Acorah spouts. Don't people KNOW he was caught out making up spooky rubbish which was presented to him as historical fact? It was ALL fiction & yet he insisted he discovered it psychically! If he had any decency he would give up this game but people keep on paying him for it so he carries on regardless!
sitemountain 5 months ago 7
derek acorah is full of bollox..wake the fuck up.. he "talks to the dead" LMFAO..he wants ur money. fuckin idiots.
euroman32589 5 months ago 3
I agree with the comment below :-)
TheBeckyboowoo 5 months ago
I don't care what this faggot said. Derek Acorah is ace
takeuchi40 5 months ago
@takeuchi40 Marry loves dick..?
oSNE4Ko 4 months ago 2
Louis is just a braver version of me..
ElectrumShiv 5 months ago
"The christian community are a cult" Yes and your and c**t now f**koff!
Ajames60 5 months ago
@unseenforce10 HAHAHAHA
djalby09 5 months ago
GREAT BREASTS DEGZY ACORAH FUCK YOU LOUIE YOU CRAB
djalby09 5 months ago 2
@djalby09 titties!!
unseenforce10 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djalby09 titties
unseenforce10 5 months ago
louie is a great breast !! degzy is a legend! scouser!
unseenforce10 5 months ago
The only TV programmes that should ever feature Derek "Acorah" Johnson are Watchdog and The real Hustle.
Psychics are conmen, end of.
asubjectiveopinion 5 months ago
1:33
dirty bastard
SVWillmer 5 months ago
Comment removed
SVWillmer 5 months ago
Comment removed
SVWillmer 5 months ago
Woah Louie whatever has balls. Whether you agree with him or not, you gotta give props for the lack of a sugar coating.
believerster 5 months ago
Well i don't agree with derek and only half agree with that louie bloke
12arsenal4eva 5 months ago
Comment removed
12arsenal4eva 5 months ago
Comment removed
12arsenal4eva 5 months ago
So by believing in god and the afterlife you must also believe in santa, the tooth fairy and unicorns yeah right because you can or cannot prove they exist!!!! get a grip on your own lives and stop clinging to omnipotent white haired guys floating around on clouds and killing and destroying in his own name? god is for old people and others that have no grip on their own lives, sort it out
TheHippy76 5 months ago
Leave the man alone, so he is not a graeat orator. That doesn't make him a cun*t. So he can't debate, so he can't proove the afterlife does not exist. Imbecile, imagine falling short of proof on that one? Kill him. And more.
duquali1 5 months ago 2
@duquali1 nor can you prove the existence of the afterlife
dirtychinchilla 5 months ago
1.34 did someone just let one go ?
thepostal15 5 months ago 16
@thepostal15 hahahaha yeah it sounds it
JohnsonAlan19 5 months ago
@thepostal15 not just me that heard it then?
MrMarkBartlett 1 month ago
Mr Savva, you've somehow managed to make clairvoyance and religion both look reasonable and inoffensive. That really takes some doing.
Good work, dickhead. Now leave the atheism and sceptism to those of us who can articulate a rational position and a logical argument without sounding like a 10 year old who's just received a chemistry set for Christmas.
CheDonJohn 6 months ago 2
the people who believe in God, afterlife, and heaven are being irresponsible because they are essentially diverting resources and attention away from scientists who are trying to develop biotechnology to make people healthy and alive indefinitely, and build a heaven on earth.
IndignantSkeptic 6 months ago
I LOVE THE GUEST HE HAD VIA SATELLIT E SUMMS UP MY VIEWS
lousaffire 6 months ago
in fact derek shakes his head assertively at the beginning because he knows that such a poor argument is no threat even to a blatant fake such as he.
TheSteelKingdom 6 months ago
if you are gonna take the fake bastard apart, do it by presenting a stronger argument than 'there is no god'
TheSteelKingdom 6 months ago
We will all die one day so we will all find out one day what the truth is so untill then enjoy your life and chill out abit.
Satanslore 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Come on people!... It's clear the mudpit & lightning created the millions of creatures that has ever lived on earth. I mean, how can we not believe something so obvious as that!? The guy on the screen clearly knows there's no afterlife, as he must've died & come to life so he can confirm it for sure...Jeeesh!
steve11fox 6 months ago
Comment removed
steve11fox 6 months ago
it is bullshit yeah but Louie Savva is a fucking nobb!
FRIEDBREAD62 6 months ago
I have to say louie does not demonstrate much intelligence by saying simply that there is no god nor heaven simply because in the same respect a good scientist does not say ye or nay to a thoery before it has been proven or disproven the truth is he is just another close minded person he could never make a scientist or any person involved in any kind of debate to him his preference is law and his appearance in this debate is worthless
PopNFreshMardellis 6 months ago
all psychic shit is fake as hell.
dr34m3r2k 6 months ago
that Louie guy looks as though he just grow balls that day lol or he had to be one of those cliche gallus gay guys
JackM2409 6 months ago
Louie Savva is a f*cking legend!!
BadPsychicsTV 6 months ago
louie sawa says there is no afterlife there is though for some people that have been murdered louie sawa is a wanker derek acorah is the best
some weird things have happened were i live i can not explain it heaven and ghosts are 2 completely different things
MegaAjax01 6 months ago
@MegaAjax01 It's funny how Derek always becomes possessed by another scouser, or maybe the ghosts just always use that accent.
rationalsalvation 6 months ago
I know theres no god the devil told me that.
fulfilled123 6 months ago
We all know there is no god no afterlife.Prove it boys show me god then I will believe you. Is god a man,woman,black,white. What a con is religion
fulfilled123 6 months ago
Louie Savva - what a bitter little c***t. He doesnt even practice parapsychology anymore. I always hated him and his "mightier than thou" attitude. Prick.
GavSalkeld 6 months ago 2
@GavSalkeld He speaks the truth. You are clearly brain washed.
dr34m3r2k 6 months ago
We Are The DORSET GHOST INVESTIGATORS
If you want to know the truth, If ghosts really exist? Please join us on our journey,
We are 2 men on a mission all Alone!
We have done 21 episodes in the most scariest places in England so far and you can watch everything on our website and youtube channel.
Please subscribe to our Youtube Channel if you are really interested in the paranormal.
Thank You
Glen and Ahmed
dorsetghostinvestigators com
dorsetghost 6 months ago
Open mindedness draws no conclusions
deelo79 6 months ago
Does God exist? I don't Know. Does God not exist? I don't know. So, I will continue questioning with an open mind, free of prejudice. I will look at everything with an open clear mind, drawing no premature conclusions. Sadly, Louie Savva doesn't approach life like this, he seems to already have all the answers, he knows already that God does not exist.... How very immature and ignorant of him. That is not to say I am on Dereks side, he is indeed a conman, and gives real spirituality a bad name
deelo79 6 months ago
Comment removed
deelo79 6 months ago
Comment removed
deelo79 6 months ago
There is a saying that comes to mind here, "The man who thinks he knows doesn't know. But the man who knows he doesn't know knows." - What this means is, an open mind is like flowing water, it never grows stale. But a closed mind is like a closed bottle of still, non flowing, water, stagnant, stuck and stale. A mind free from prejudice will intuit truth more clearly than a mind full of prejudice, arrogance, and hate.
deelo79 6 months ago
angry people have small weiners
BoxingDrunk 6 months ago
Both of these men are ignorant. It is like watching too brain dead zombies have an argument. The intelligent mind knows to draw NO conclusions without evidence. Louie, I'm sorry to say but there is no evidence to prove god doesn't exist, just as there is no evidence that he does exist. You have to be open minded to all possibilities in life, for life is a mystery. Even scientists have admitted that they cannot say god does not exist. Even Albert Einstein was open to the idea of a God existing!
deelo79 7 months ago
@deelo79 The burden of proof is upon those making the claim that God does exist. As an atheist it is not my responsibility to prove that God doesn't exist only to justify my lack of beleif, which is easily done. I believe Louie got it wrong as he went on the attack and isolated himself from the audience. He could have ridiculed Derek Acorah by asking questions to allow him to trip himself up. Derek Acorah is a con-artist who prays on the guillable and should never be given air time.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@deelo79 Oh and also, life isn't really a mystery. Scientists have a very thorough explaination of the biological processess that constitute life. From its origins (abiogenisis) to how life flourished when it got started (evolution) their understanding is pretty concise. I appreciate there may be gaps in their knowledge but they are constantly refining our understanding in the discovery of new evidence.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity So are you saying that you believe everything you are told by modern day priests (scientists) who throw many fancy words and theories your way and you happily accept them without thinking for yourself? I don't claim to know more than you or less than you. However, the difference between me and you is that you choose to label yourself (just like religious people, who you seem to dislike), you choose to follow a belief, and conclude things that you yourself cannot prove.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity "Life isn't really a mystery" -- that has to be the most ignorant and arrogant things anyone can ever say. Even a true scientist would disagree with you (I'm not talking about those dogmatic scientists, I talking about true scientists, who have open minds to all possibilities.) The very reason scientists do what they do is because they are inspired by the mystery of existence. Even if the "theory" of evolution is true, that isn't an end all answer!
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 when I said 'life isn't really a mystery' I mean we have discovered alot. I am not saying there are not any gaps in our understanding. I am not ignorant to how far the scientific method has developed our understanding. You on the other hand seem to think that scientists ('modern day priests' - in your words, which really does display your ignorance) somehow make it up as they go along and that 'theories' are plucked from thin air. A theory is a model best describing a myriad of facts!
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity You clearly did not read my comments. There is a great deal of arrogance in the field of science, but yes, there is a great deal of scientists who are open minded and have indeed made incredible discoveries and have greatly advanced our understanding of nature. What I am against, is when people say that something doesn't exist without showing any evidence. God could very well exist, and I think it is foolish to just jump to the conclusion that it doesn't. That only births dogma.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 Scientists and religious people have been arguing for years and years over this, and it is such a waste of energy. The only good argument is one that comes to an eventual understanding and cooperation. Albert Einstein even got frustrated over the childish arguing between science and religion, when he stated that "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - When I was a kid I was taught to talk to others instead of argue with them and fight with them.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 - What Einstein meant by his statement was this, science without spirituality is lacking in full understanding, and spirituality without science is also lacking in full understanding. It is as Bruce Lee said, "You must bring natural response and control together to create perfect harmony, because, if you have one to the extreme, you become unscientific, but if you have the other to the extreme, you become a mechanical man." - The middle path is the ultimate path of true understanding.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 if you want to quote Einstein, lets go for this one: 'It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.' Quote mining gets you know where. its an argument from authority.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity Do you understand what "open mindedness" means? Because I have the feeling that you don't.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I respect what science does, and have achieved, but it has no authority over me. I am free to see things and question things in my own free way. Science likes to cut things open, and take things apart, in the hope that it will learn the secrets of nature. But science cannot reveal the soul, the essence of existence cannot be cut open and taken apart.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 you are asserting that a soul exists. That is a faith based position. As i have also said previously in our discussion, I am also open to the possibility of God existing but personally do not believe it. Look you either believe or disbelieve, there is no default position. Saying 'I don't know' doesn't address the question as we are not talking about absolute knowledge. You strike me as a theist who is in the closet. You keep talking about spirituality and the soul.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I disagree with you, there is a third position on things, you don't have to believe or disbelieve, you can stand on the middle path which draws no judgement or fixed conclusions. The middle path is the living path, what I mean by that, is that it is fluid, forever moving forward just like the moment which never stands still, but is in a constant flow, adapting to every change. If you believe in something, you block yourself, and if you disbelieve in something, you block yourself.
deelo79 6 months ago
Comment removed
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity Words mean what you want them to mean, when I say that I am open to the soul existing, I'm am not asserting or believing that it exists, I am simply acknowledging that it is a possibility that has not yet been proven or disproven. So to choose to conclude it either way would be a terrible mistake, and so, I say this, instead of ignoring it, and concluding it, lets investigate it further until we find an answer.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 Also I fundimentaly disagree that words just mean whatever you want them to mean. If that was the case communication would not be possible. I think I understand what you are getting at but I still disagree. You seem to be deluding yourself. Maybe your afraid of the truth, i suppose I will never know, I don't know you personally.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity The word soul, to me, has no definitive meaning, after all, it is just a word we give to something that we cannot explain. In a way, the soul is a form of energy, that gives us life, and which disappears when we die. It might live on after death, or it might not live on after death, no one knows. So, I will never conclude as to whether it exists or not, as I have no right to say, because I do not know. Therefore, again, I am open to either possibility.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 thanks for the discussion. I'm done now. i can see there is no point in it continuing as neither of us are going to budge. I think you are playing with words. You seem to be saying that everything is subjective, none of these words actually mean anything and you are happy just to redefine them so that you are comfortable. I just don't view the world the way you do.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I thank you also for the discussion. Even though we didn't come to an understanding, it was a pleasure exchanging comments with you. I will say this, if you look at the history of language and words, many words over time have taken on different meanings, or, there meanings expand due to our greater understanding of what the word is referring to. Words and language can evolve, and should evolve.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity Take the word 'Atom' for instance. When the atom was first discovered we knew very little about it, but as scientists studied it over the years, they learnt more and more about it. So even thought the word 'atom' stayed the same, the understanding of the atom changed. This, to me, can also be applied to words like "Soul", although the word doesn't change, the understanding of what it actually is might change as we learn more about it. Anyway, it was nice hearing your views.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity One thing I avoid is labels. Labels hold you back, they are restricting and segregate you form others. The only label I am comfortable wearing is that I am a human being, who wants to look at everything and be open to everything with a completely open and clear mind. I've always believed in cooperation and communication, rather than competition and conflict, which labels tend to cause.
deelo79 6 months ago
Comment removed
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity YES, Einstein didn't "BELIEVE" in a personal God, but he was spiritual, and open minded to the possibility of a consciousness behind the order, design, and complexity of the universe. In fact, Einstein hated atheists using him to prove there is no God, because he NEVER backed such a claim!! He simply did not believe in a personal God, HE WAS OPEN MINDED, as all scientists should be! If your mind is closed to anything, it will become stuck and rigid, no longer fluid and open.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I am not ignorant, ignorance can not exist in a mind which is open to all possibilities. Ignorance is born from minds which draw immature conclusions. I know there is a certain amount of arrogance within the field of science as I have witnessed first hand being displayed in many articles and debates, but it is not science, it is down to the individual. Organised religion is worse for dogma, I totally agree. However, that does not mean that a God, or Creator, doesn't exist.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity Ignorance is born when one chooses to ignore something. I do not agree with organised religion, but, I am able to see the value within sacred spiritual texts, which have been greatly abused and misunderstood by most religious people. For instance, if you judge the bible without first reading it, that is ignorance, for you are judging something based on nothing.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 You are misrepresenting Scientists. I really don't understand why you have come to the conclusion that they are arrogant? There are many scientists who believe in God, as well as the ones who do not. Scientists are open minded, they have to have a certain degree of humility, for we are constantly increasing our understanding of nature . No one knows with absolute certainty that there is not a God but the reasonable approach is to doubt everything which has not be proven.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@deelo79 I agree that sacred spiritual texts have value. There are some positive teachings, as well as others which are fundimentally immoral (and those tend to be ignored). When it comes to the argument over Gods existence,the burden of proof is upon the person making the claim. i.e. If you tell me that you have green fairies at the bottom of your garden, then the default position is that i would not believe you and it is up to you to provide the evidence.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I agree with you that proof is always needed in order to find the truth. And yes, there is no evidence to say that there is a God, but there is also no evidence to say that there isn't a God. Even the theory of evolution does not prove that there is not a God. Even Darwin was open to the existence of a God, or consciousness behind the design of nature and evolution.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 and may I also add, the theory of evolution does not set out to prove the existence of God. The theory of evolution explains how life has flourished once it got started and accounts for the diversity in nature. You really need to research a little bit more before you start ranting on. Even if Darwin was open to the possibility of God... so what? that doesn't mean anything. I am also open to the possibility, even though I find it highly unlikely,i'm nt saying I know for sure no one does.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity You once again misunderstood my comment, I did not say that the theory of evolution set out to prove the existence of God, I simply stated that it does not disprove the existence of a God or of a conscious intelligence behind the design of existence. The reason I made the original comment is because many people use the theory of evolution as a way of discounting the existence of God, which makes no sense at all, as it does not prove that God does not exist!
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity You are right, I am not disagreeing with you, evidence is always needed to prove something exists, all I am saying is, just because that evidence has not yet been found, does not mean that we should suddenly jump to the conclusion that God does not exist! I think it is unscientific to jump to conclusions, and to argue and ridicule. It is always better to discuss intelligently all possibilities, whether they are provable or unprovable.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 To say I think it is very unlikely that God exists without evidence to support that unlikeliness, is like a judge in a court room saying to the accused, "even though there is no evidence to support the claim that you committed a crime, I personally think you did, therefore you will go to prison for life." - Surely it is better to put it this way. Does God exist? I don't know. Does God not exist? I don't know, so, let's find out. Instead of saying, God existing is highly unlikely.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 is like a judge in a court room saying to the accused, "even though there is no evidence to support the claim that you committed a crime, I personally think you did." i'm afraid its nothing like that because someone would not be in court unless there is reasonable evidence against them. There is reasonable evidence to come to the conclusion that God does not exist without knowing absolutely. I personally lack a belief in a God as the claim has failed to meet its burden of proof.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity Every question answered only raises more questions. The most developed science remains a continual becoming. The rational approach starts from the idea that everything is explainable and that mystery is in some sense the enemy. This means that it prefers pejorative, and even wrong, answers to admitting its own lack of understanding.
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 Science is adaptable with the addition of new evidence, it is refined to provide us with the best possible understanding of nature and the laws which govern it. Completely the opposite of say, religion, which is dogmatic and unchanging. Scientists do not presume that everything is explainable, that is a straw-man fallacy, you are misrepresenting their position. They conclude that the scientific method is the most reliable and accurate method we have for understanding nature.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@deelo79 Scientists are the first to admit if something is wrong, why do you think scientific journals are peer reviewed? Sorry but you should really do a little more research. If you think that the Science is done in a dogmatic and arrogant fashion then you really have no idea how the Scientific method works. It is humble in the sense that any theory worth its salt shall stand up to careful scrutiny by being tested and repeated by other Scientists, that's how the peer review process works.
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity "Oh and also, life isn't really a mystery. Scientists have a very thorough explaination of the biological processess that constitute life. From its origins (abiogenisis) to how life flourished when it got started (evolution) their understanding is pretty concise." - This does not take away the mystery, this is only an understanding of part of the mystery of existence, and even then, it is still a mystery, for what drives it? What is the essence behind the movement?
deelo79 6 months ago
@deelo79 Why do you presume there has to be something driving it? you're going all aesoteric and meta physical now. Your answers are loaded with presuppositions that you can't seem to see beyond. Actually it does take away the myster as our understanding starts to unravel that which was once unknown to us. Life is very well understood, now if you are talking about what was before that, then we are not discussing life anymore, rather something else. What exactly are you getting at?
soulfunkcity 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity I presume nothing, I merely am open minded to all possibilities. You presume there is no God or conscious creator! Let me put it to you as simply as I can (even though I have tried several times already, you clearly keep misunderstanding my comments) Here it goes - I am open to all possibilities, that includes the existence of a consciousness behind the creation of the universe aka God. Now, LET ME BE CRYSTAL CLEAR, I DO NOT BELIEVE IN A GOD, I AM SIMPLY OPEN TO THE POSSIBILITY!
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity "BELIEVING" in something is to conclude something based on zero evidence, that includes the belief that a God does not exist, that is a presumption, as there is ZERO evidence to support such a claim. BELIEVING is concluding, whereas, being OPEN MINDED TO POSSIBILITIES, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF A CONSCIOUS CREATOR is very different from BELIEVING, as it is open to any possibility, are we clear now?
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity You might have an issue with the idea of a consciousness behind the creation of the universe, but I don't. Even if it was proven that a God doesn't exist, I would be absolutely fine with that, so don't start thinking that I am a nut who is desperate for a God to exist, I am merely free of prejudice towards ideas, I am OPEN MINDED, not CLOSED MINDED.
deelo79 6 months ago
@soulfunkcity And btw, I can quote who I like thank you very much, and yes, Einstein wasn't religious, you missed the point behind his statement, he was open minded to spirituality and to consciousness. I have read a lot about Einstein thank you very much, and I have even read interviews which were conducted with Albert Einstein in which he states that he does not believe in a personal God, but, that he is OPEN MINDED to the POSSIBILITY of the existence of a consciousness behind creation.
deelo79 6 months ago
That was like dumb and dumber debating the origins of the universe.
HomeskooledVideo 7 months ago
I don't like either of them, but louie savva? Saying "there is no god there is no afterlife" how fucking arrogant are you? You think everyone who believes in god is an idiot?
steve816100 7 months ago
savva - silly little brat with a plum in his mouth and up his bum.
bullshotter 7 months ago
@bullshotter ?? ur just a dick who believes everything
greekpanther1 6 months ago
Comment removed
bullshotter 3 months ago
@greekpanther1
I actually disagree with everything Acorah says and does. That doesn't prevent me thinking that this savva character seems ghastly. Unable to put his views forward without acting arrogant, aggressive and childish.
Bit like you really.
bullshotter 3 months ago
@bullshotter well the thing is, some of us are fed up with people like this already and we give a damn about the truth.
greekpanther1 3 months ago
i agree that derek is a fraud, but Louie went way to far. i dont believe in god or an afterlife but its certainly not childist if you do believe in them, everyone can have their opinion and i completly respect that, i hate people who force religon or non-religion onto others, its THEIR choice. having different opinions is not a bad thing, if we all had the same ideas and believe, we would all be identical, and wheres the fun in that? x
animelover5076 7 months ago
Nolan is a prick.
Bumblybee256 7 months ago
It is better to believe in God and find out in the end that there is none, than to not believe in God and find out in the end that there is ONE.
buxomyankee 7 months ago
@buxomyankee What if you choose the wrong God to believe in? Or are all the Gods the right Gods?
adam666machina 7 months ago
@buxomyankee What if you choose the wrong God to believe in? Or are all the Gods the right Gods? Plus if there is no God wouldn't you have wasted a lot of years praying and going to church etc.?
adam666machina 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We are the DORSET GHOST INVESTIGATORS
if you want to know the truth, If ghosts really exist? Please join us on our journey, we are 2 men on a mission all alone. We have done 16 episodes in the most scariest places in England so far and you can watch everything on our website and youtube channel,
Please subscribe to our youtube channel if you are interested in the paranormal.
Thank You
Glen and Ahmed
dorsetghostinvestigators com
dorsetghost 7 months ago
He's not a prick. It's good to have people that will approach the ridiculousness of religion head on rather than dance around it like the majority of non-believers do.
This is like a priest standing in front of a church and saying that atheists and all other sinners will be doomed to an eternity of hell, the only difference being that Louie Savva is saying that all followers of religion, psychics and what have you are doomed to a lifetime of idiocy.
rophnpwaul 7 months ago
People believe in God and others don't, it's something that will never be proven, don't be such an asshole to say heaven is childish when you don't know any of the wiser!
MrChunkerz 7 months ago
Hahaha, well done Louie
MiserVII 7 months ago
we need more people like louie savva
MarieEC11 7 months ago
He's my hero. He's awesome, tell em straight. Use your brains stop thinking theres some all powerful being just because your to lazy to think of something logical!!!!
CastielProductions 7 months ago
Now that was a bit harsh
gerbilbrownlow 7 months ago
He's not a prick, he's telling these people straight. They are being conned.
CastielProductions 7 months ago
Prick or not, he has a point. Sometimes to get your' point across you have to be blunt even if it does offend others. Also, there's tons of evidence that it's all fake, so the presenter is chatting shit when he says 'you don't know for sure'. Those who don't are those in denial.
AshMashDashSplash 8 months ago
ppl choose parkinson's? Derek is disgusting AND an emotional predator.
Y do ppl get their undies in such a wad over religion?? Either believing or not believing... If there were no religion, just think how happy the world would be. Naw... we'd have to find something else to fight about. Louie is right tho in that if you do not believe in God, then how to believe the rest of this garbage? It requires a multitude of spurious nested and interlinked suppositions.
xrisku 8 months ago
both were in the wrong, louie shouldn't of insulted the christian community and derek should not of said people choose to be ill or abused etc.
Gravityxx16 8 months ago
lol your mums a cult
TheBenni10 8 months ago
wow, derek is a cock for saying people who suffer bring it on themselves. Louie Savva is right to attack him for that.
0verlord1841 8 months ago
Derek is a con man along with the rest of these ideots who claim to have phychic powers and make a living out of it.
mc28x 8 months ago
Derek is a pillock how can you bring disease on yourself
Tamsin330 8 months ago
dereck is the only scouser id trust why would dereck con people hes said in the past a good medium would give you a reading and not charge you a penny
SuperStringfella 8 months ago
Louie Swawa needs a good kick in the head, creepy looking bastard! Check out his eyes, he's on drugs!
TheRepublicanGreen 8 months ago
Stupid atheist. By being an unrelenting prick all you do is alienate others and this undermines your position. There was no need to bring in atheism in order to show this Derek character is a fraud. You don't win people over by being an asshole.
1noen1 8 months ago
Good on ya Louie :)
ngrep 9 months ago
i'm not religious but not atheist either. there are greater forces out there other than ourselves but a man sitting on a cloud with a white beard and greek sandles doesn't sound likey.
breasthound 9 months ago