Added: 1 year ago
From: UCBerkeleyEvents
Views: 2,516
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And anyway I'm 100% for regime change in Iran due to it being a theocracy, not their capabilities.

    Unlike Iraq, though, it's someone else's turn besides the US to do the right thing.

  • Iran has had 9 years to produce a uranium and/or nuclear bomb with 2001 technology, Russian technitions, and Russian. We did it from 1942 to 1945. Iran may be backward, but they have a nuclear bomb. THe Pentagon says they can shoot down their ICBM, so they will have to ship it FED-EX or drive them over the Mexican border in a pick-up truck.

  • @JohnLloydScharf The Iranians aren't a threat to the US, it's our job to make sure they aren't a threat to their neighbors. Israel, Saudi, Iraq, and India really, really dislike Iran having bombs. Problem is how little anyone can do about it.

  • @MultiUniv3rsal The difference between the truth and your perspective is reality. We have hundreds, if not thousands, of illegal immigrants arriving every day. We have 100s of tons of drugs that arrive in the US every day. The number of nuclear weapons that arrive every day is not known.

  • @JohnLloydScharf Do you have anything to back that up or are you just assuming it to be the case because it's a possibility?

  • @MultiUniv3rsal We are fighting wars based on reducing the probability that al Qaida will do a repeat of 9/11. Iran has nuclear weapons now. To claim otherwise is willing ignorance. The US created a uranium and a plutonium bomb in less than 3 years. Iran has had six years, a reactor, centrifuges, and Russian technition. Nukes are about 100 lbs and smaller than a beach ball. It is a rational assumption not dependent on the your Obama based theology or theocracy.

  • @JohnLloydScharf Well I base MAD on the fact that they know, just like the N. Koreans, that if they pulled something like that they would literally be committing genocide against their own people.

    They are just going to mull around and bargain with their bombs, otherwise why wouldn't the Koreans already have used a dirty bomb tactic?

    Here's another almost-certainty; if Iran went to war by sending bombs, it's already unruly populous would hang every government official within a week.

  • @MultiUniv3rsal Obviously, Iran's populus would not know who set off nukes in the the US anymore than we would. It would just be the death of millions of "Infidels" they could celebrate without any need to take direct responsibility for. MAD as a policy was based on the assumption that the USSR's planes or ICBMs could be tracked to their source. Are you this stubbornly and willfully ignorant about everything? Or is it just your sacred duty to Obama?

  • @JohnLloydScharf Wow, that was an absurdly thick statement. Good day.

  • @MultiUniv3rsal It apt, rational, and informed. I am certain you have difficulty understanding it and actually think your reponse was insightful.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more