Added: 2 years ago
From: hgartz444
Views: 402
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why didn't you interview the ANC guys?

    I know why :)

    Why didn't you get the POV from his window from where he crouched down?

    I know why :)

    Whynot point out that if the plane had travelled SOC that he would have seen the whole plane? That he wouldn't even have to crouch? That a plane travelling on THE SOC path 450ft away and at 233ft agl would NOT have had the effect on him he described?

    Why not tell us that P4T has proven that the shadow could not reach his shop SOC?

    I know why ;)

  • Thank you Larson for confirming NOC.

    You be coming over from the Dark side now?

  • Great work hfartz444, it's nice to know that Ed Paiks account of where the plane was hasn't changed since CIT first interviewed him. Keep up the good work of confirming CIT's excellent reporting.

  • Larson, the guy even says the plane flew over his shop. This is consistent with the north of citgo approach. Stop wasting so many man hours trying to muddy the waters re CIT's findings.

    I rated your video 5 stars because he confirms the north path despite what your long-winded, verbose, wordy, verbose, long-winded "essay" tries to have everyone believe.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more