You traditionalists are so delusional. In today's world, you can't win souls with Middle Age rituals. I was a convert to your faith from another religion. I admire Pope Paul VI because he simplified the Church and brought it closer to the people, to the simple masses. Sheesh, the Church was made to serve people, not kingly Italians in the Curia. Do you think you will be able to get the gospel across with rich robes and expensive tiaras? You win them by understanding where they are!
The real Catholic Pope, Gregory XVII, Cardinal Siri, lawfully and canonically elected Pope in 1958, was kept a prisoner of the Vatican during 31 years until his death on 2 may 1989. The Vatican has become a corrupt, and freemasonic infested whorehouse, and every true Christian should protest the series of anti-Pope's we have had, and who destroyed the Catholic Church beyong recognition.
I receive reactions so I choose to react as follows: Paulus VI complained that the devil had enterred the church. How could he be surprised as he opened the doors himself?
@AndreasAntoniusMaria The only true Pope from 1958 conclave was cardinal Siri, also known as Gregory XVII, who has been kept prisoner by the criminal freemasonic gang of the Vatican ever since His lawful election until his death in 1989.
It is even worse; The free masons now operate under the banner of the Neo Catechumenal Way of Free mason first class Kiko Arguello. They try to take over the Church. If Vaticanum II was a huge success, I would not mind. But even in Spain there is a rapid decline of the catholic faith, due to the VII Changes.
@AndreasAntoniusMaria vat 2 was a complete failure, because it was an illegal council. John XXIII was an illegal Pope. The real Pope,Gregory XVII was elected on that very same conclave of 1958, and Roncalli had the audacity to present himself as Pope on the balcony while inside, on that very moment, the real Pope was already a prisoner. They call it the "Siri-thesis", as if they were discussing some philosopical disagreement. The hard fact of the election of Siri is the timebomb of the Vatican.
@rooizilver Didn't Cardinal Siri submit to the authority of Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI, Pope John Paul I and Pope John Paul II? I don't recall him actually supporting any sedevacantist groups.
Thanks for confirming that you witnessed the death of the real Pope Paul VI.
However, Semjase has mentioned regarding that the real Pope Paul VI was poisoned and replaced with a look-alike unnoticed for many years within contact 55 and 56.
55th
Semjase- 70/It has came true, and so two years after his nomination to become Pope.
No, that time is not yet. As Billy said: „Dies offen zu nennen würde ‚das Feuer in Holland entfachen. In other words: To disclose the real happenings would trigger very heavy turmoil.
un papa incompreso troppo intelligente rinnovatore un vero santo che ha diviso i momenti +brutti della vita italiana non capisco il perche* non sia ancora santo certo che la chiesa e* strana specialmente quella romana Montini era circondato da cardinali invidiosi della sua intelligenza e della sua visione globale dei problemi che in quel momento stavano afliggendo sia la chiesa che il mondo non lo hanno mai aiutato ha dovuto fare tutto da solo lo hanno isolato i soliti romani
A real holy man, a refined intellectual with an exquisite sensitivity, often misunderstood. The Church was real progressist and plural thanks to him, with JPII it came backwards...
what do u mean John Paul II was a conservative plus the church needs to go back. Latin mass, confessionals(not face to face) communion in mouth, people simply dont care anymore going to church in shorts woman should have a mantilla on there head. Thank God we have Benedict now. John Paul 2 we love you
Le Pape est le successeur de Pierre, Vicaire du Christ, choisis par l'Esprit Saint à travers les cardinaux. Seul un homme hors du commun peut devenir Pape.
It warms my heart immensely to read here the comments praising and appreciating Pope Paul VI. A truly great man and a truly great Pope. He suffered so much on account of the deplorable disobedience he was shown by so many.
He suffered from deplorable disobedience because he had not the courrage to correct the disobedient. He was not able to correct extreme conservatives (Lefevbre) or extreme liberal-progressive movements(liberation theology in S.America). Lucky for the Church JP II was a much stronger pope.
I find it strange that people, in particular protestants have this naive obsession in attempting to use the scriptures to contradict the RCC, excuse me, it was the RCC and the Orthodox church that actually compiled the scriptures into what we know it today. The protestant movement started in 1500's thanks to Luther, he himself was a monk prior to this, he didn't see any contradiction between the scriptures in terms of 'call no man your father' because he understood in CONTEXT.
Rubbish, he was the one in the midst of the huge debate on contraception affirmed with the encyclical 'humanae vitae' the church's opposition to contraception as well as the affirmation of priestly celibacy in 'sarcedotalis caelibatus'
He was a strong pope, pope's have different characteristics, he wasn't a Pius XII or a Benedict XV, but Paul VI, he is himself and there was nothing wrong with his pontificate, he brought much needed changes with Vatican II, that takes guts more than anything
Well, I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I do not call my priest Father as in God, I call him Father because he is a spiritual father to his flock. And, God willing, if I become a priest, I will become my flocks spiritual Father, their shepard, to lead them to those green pastures he promised us. Because I think all, Catholic or Protestant, we all want the same thing, the saving of all mankind from sin :-).
Writers on the Canon Law say, "The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth."- Barclay Cap. XXVII, p. 218. Cities Petrus Bertrandus, Pius V. - Cardinal Cusa supports his statement.
.-Pope Nicholas I declared that "the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who, being God, cannot be judged by man." - Labb IX Dist.: 96 Can. 7, Satis evidentur, Decret Gratian Primer Para.
Actually, there is an issue about these books because noody knew what book should be considered sacred. Take for example, it was not only Luke, MArk, Matthew and John wrote the gospels.There wre other gospels like those of Gospel according to Peter and others. Now, the point that I wish i would like to make it clear is that if you accpet the books of the Bible, you cannot deny that the Overseers of the Church were guided by the Holy Spirit in choosing what books should be included.
In choosing the books, it did not usurp the power of God but rather made he made his power visible among the people whom he choose as the shepherds of his flock because he presserved them from error in faith and morals. It only mant that "he is with them until the end of AGe"
It was believers who determined what was God breathed in both the old and new testaments. Joh 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
tray again.and this time read church history.I was pretty sure that paul and the other apostles were of the fold of christ.unless you decided that;s not true,just like the reformers decided to remove the deuterocanonical books out of the canon.
They are not part of the Jewish early books. Actually these books were not even in Jewish writings but of Greeks. Thats why they are not preseved and never recognized by the Levites. Not on their historical ages.
Who led the early christians? Did ALL the early christians chose what books should be included? They always turn their own bishops when there was theological disspute. Even to the time the bible did not existed. Also, the Bishops of the Catholic Church can trace its roots to the early christians and to the 12 Apostles.
Therefore, in your claim that the early christians chose what books should be included, it would mean to say that there was a time when the Bible did not even existed! Who were the early christians?
Catholicism is what YAHUSHUA/Jesus described as the Nicolaitans (nico/conquer + laitans/people) When a group of people replace their head (Messiah) with a counterfeit (the Pope). it is also the first white horse&rider with bow and crown in the vision of the four horsemen.
In other words, don't trust your Pastor... or perhaps we won't trust you because you're a man too... or perhaps we won't trust the bible because it was just written by men including those phrases that you are quoting..
The Bible was written over a 1600 year period by over 40 different writers,most of whom never met one another. Living in different historical eras, regions and cultures, the only thing they had in common was their claim of being inspired by the one true God. One would expect to find contradictions and inconsistencies among the numerous places,people and offices mentioned by 40 different writers over 1600 years yet there are none. This is one of the most powerful arguments that it is God's word.
YEs the books in the Bible are written by people inspired by God. But the question is, who decided what books should be put in the Bible? I would suggest you research the canon of the Bible. and also, are the people in the bibilical times are the only people inspired by God? No. Christ has said to Peter "whatsoever you permit in earth is permitted in heaven and what you forbid in earth is forbidden in heaven" and to his brothers " Iwll be with you until the end of Age".
You traditionalists are so delusional. In today's world, you can't win souls with Middle Age rituals. I was a convert to your faith from another religion. I admire Pope Paul VI because he simplified the Church and brought it closer to the people, to the simple masses. Sheesh, the Church was made to serve people, not kingly Italians in the Curia. Do you think you will be able to get the gospel across with rich robes and expensive tiaras? You win them by understanding where they are!
raczinger20 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit ww w.youtube.c om/user/mhfm1 for critical information for your soul.
Please do not ignore this chance to learn of the one true faith.
DeusVeritas1 9 months ago
The real Catholic Pope, Gregory XVII, Cardinal Siri, lawfully and canonically elected Pope in 1958, was kept a prisoner of the Vatican during 31 years until his death on 2 may 1989. The Vatican has become a corrupt, and freemasonic infested whorehouse, and every true Christian should protest the series of anti-Pope's we have had, and who destroyed the Catholic Church beyong recognition.
rooizilver 1 year ago
the first traveller pope :) nice god bless him
uudrakgvens94 1 year ago
If People knew What REALLY happened behind Paul's Papacy, they would stop mocking him. Ora Pro Nobis.
KnightOfGodsCourt 2 years ago
Ottaviani would have made a much stronger pope!
AndreasAntoniusMaria 2 years ago
Alfredo Ottaviani era troppo conservatore. Paolo VI aprí le finestre delle Chiesa a tutti gli uomini di buona volontá. Lei era il migliore nel 1963.
FanUltimate 1 year ago
I receive reactions so I choose to react as follows: Paulus VI complained that the devil had enterred the church. How could he be surprised as he opened the doors himself?
AndreasAntoniusMaria 1 year ago
@AndreasAntoniusMaria The only true Pope from 1958 conclave was cardinal Siri, also known as Gregory XVII, who has been kept prisoner by the criminal freemasonic gang of the Vatican ever since His lawful election until his death in 1989.
rooizilver 1 year ago
@rooizilver
It is even worse; The free masons now operate under the banner of the Neo Catechumenal Way of Free mason first class Kiko Arguello. They try to take over the Church. If Vaticanum II was a huge success, I would not mind. But even in Spain there is a rapid decline of the catholic faith, due to the VII Changes.
AndreasAntoniusMaria 1 year ago
@AndreasAntoniusMaria vat 2 was a complete failure, because it was an illegal council. John XXIII was an illegal Pope. The real Pope,Gregory XVII was elected on that very same conclave of 1958, and Roncalli had the audacity to present himself as Pope on the balcony while inside, on that very moment, the real Pope was already a prisoner. They call it the "Siri-thesis", as if they were discussing some philosopical disagreement. The hard fact of the election of Siri is the timebomb of the Vatican.
rooizilver 1 year ago
@rooizilver Didn't Cardinal Siri submit to the authority of Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI, Pope John Paul I and Pope John Paul II? I don't recall him actually supporting any sedevacantist groups.
prmacaluso 3 months ago
Un grande Papa, un grande pensatore, un uomo che si è saputo confrontare con le diverse realtà della Chiesa!
buclerino 2 years ago
Dear Billy
Thanks for confirming that you witnessed the death of the real Pope Paul VI.
However, Semjase has mentioned regarding that the real Pope Paul VI was poisoned and replaced with a look-alike unnoticed for many years within contact 55 and 56.
55th
Semjase- 70/It has came true, and so two years after his nomination to become Pope.
JavierVMaldonado 2 years ago
56th
Meier- . how he could actually be dethroned and murdered.
Semjase- 2/Surely. 3/The pityable matter happened as follows...
My question is: Is it time to disclose Semjases explanation?
Salome
Savio
JavierVMaldonado 2 years ago
No, that time is not yet. As Billy said: „Dies offen zu nennen würde ‚das Feuer in Holland entfachen. In other words: To disclose the real happenings would trigger very heavy turmoil.
JavierVMaldonado 2 years ago
un papa incompreso troppo intelligente rinnovatore un vero santo che ha diviso i momenti +brutti della vita italiana non capisco il perche* non sia ancora santo certo che la chiesa e* strana specialmente quella romana Montini era circondato da cardinali invidiosi della sua intelligenza e della sua visione globale dei problemi che in quel momento stavano afliggendo sia la chiesa che il mondo non lo hanno mai aiutato ha dovuto fare tutto da solo lo hanno isolato i soliti romani
teatroliricodimilano 2 years ago
A real holy man, a refined intellectual with an exquisite sensitivity, often misunderstood. The Church was real progressist and plural thanks to him, with JPII it came backwards...
nalunoteri 2 years ago
what do u mean John Paul II was a conservative plus the church needs to go back. Latin mass, confessionals(not face to face) communion in mouth, people simply dont care anymore going to church in shorts woman should have a mantilla on there head. Thank God we have Benedict now. John Paul 2 we love you
mburns8395 2 years ago 2
..nuntio voBBBBis...
ahó, che é, Aldo Fabbbbrizzi!?!
deutscheseele 3 years ago
Surprisingly, a color version of this video exists.
emir0721 3 years ago
Le Pape est le successeur de Pierre, Vicaire du Christ, choisis par l'Esprit Saint à travers les cardinaux. Seul un homme hors du commun peut devenir Pape.
We love THEM...
mathildec75 3 years ago 2
He is the Least Appreciated Pope. He had Done many good in the Church but he had reccieved no Credit at all.
omaragiusu 3 years ago
It warms my heart immensely to read here the comments praising and appreciating Pope Paul VI. A truly great man and a truly great Pope. He suffered so much on account of the deplorable disobedience he was shown by so many.
Hiberniensis 3 years ago
He suffered from deplorable disobedience because he had not the courrage to correct the disobedient. He was not able to correct extreme conservatives (Lefevbre) or extreme liberal-progressive movements(liberation theology in S.America). Lucky for the Church JP II was a much stronger pope.
AndreasAntoniusMaria 3 years ago
W il Papa
Laus Iesu
m3a3t 3 years ago
I find it strange that people, in particular protestants have this naive obsession in attempting to use the scriptures to contradict the RCC, excuse me, it was the RCC and the Orthodox church that actually compiled the scriptures into what we know it today. The protestant movement started in 1500's thanks to Luther, he himself was a monk prior to this, he didn't see any contradiction between the scriptures in terms of 'call no man your father' because he understood in CONTEXT.
HumaniGeneris 3 years ago
Nice friendly man, but not a stong pope. Not suited for his difficult job. A holy man though!
AndreasAntoniusMaria 3 years ago
Rubbish, he was the one in the midst of the huge debate on contraception affirmed with the encyclical 'humanae vitae' the church's opposition to contraception as well as the affirmation of priestly celibacy in 'sarcedotalis caelibatus'
He was a strong pope, pope's have different characteristics, he wasn't a Pius XII or a Benedict XV, but Paul VI, he is himself and there was nothing wrong with his pontificate, he brought much needed changes with Vatican II, that takes guts more than anything
HumaniGeneris 3 years ago
bel video storico
fantastico885 3 years ago
Well, I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I do not call my priest Father as in God, I call him Father because he is a spiritual father to his flock. And, God willing, if I become a priest, I will become my flocks spiritual Father, their shepard, to lead them to those green pastures he promised us. Because I think all, Catholic or Protestant, we all want the same thing, the saving of all mankind from sin :-).
jgrisso07 3 years ago 3
And God bless the servant of God, Paul VI! He worked so hard to reform the church and carried out what Bl. John XXIII started.
jgrisso07 3 years ago 6
Paul VI. was a great pope!
Long live the pope!
Catholic Church 4ever!
hucki2 3 years ago 2
Poco romanaccio con tripla B il tizio che ci annunzia il magnum gaudium...
Ma chi è,lo zio di Totti???
Pettine80 4 years ago
E' il cardinale Alfredo Ottaviani.
RiccardoP1983 4 years ago
Writers on the Canon Law say, "The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth."- Barclay Cap. XXVII, p. 218. Cities Petrus Bertrandus, Pius V. - Cardinal Cusa supports his statement.
.-Pope Nicholas I declared that "the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who, being God, cannot be judged by man." - Labb IX Dist.: 96 Can. 7, Satis evidentur, Decret Gratian Primer Para.
glizag 4 years ago
Alguém poderia colocar um video do "HABEMVS PAPAM" DE Paulo VI completo?
deiecclesiaefidelis 4 years ago
Actually, there is an issue about these books because noody knew what book should be considered sacred. Take for example, it was not only Luke, MArk, Matthew and John wrote the gospels.There wre other gospels like those of Gospel according to Peter and others. Now, the point that I wish i would like to make it clear is that if you accpet the books of the Bible, you cannot deny that the Overseers of the Church were guided by the Holy Spirit in choosing what books should be included.
ednardkim 4 years ago
In choosing the books, it did not usurp the power of God but rather made he made his power visible among the people whom he choose as the shepherds of his flock because he presserved them from error in faith and morals. It only mant that "he is with them until the end of AGe"
ednardkim 4 years ago
It was believers who determined what was God breathed in both the old and new testaments. Joh 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
- His sheep do not accept the apocryphal books.
PaulMacGregorWhitby 4 years ago
tray again.and this time read church history.I was pretty sure that paul and the other apostles were of the fold of christ.unless you decided that;s not true,just like the reformers decided to remove the deuterocanonical books out of the canon.
emurami 4 years ago
They are not part of the Jewish early books. Actually these books were not even in Jewish writings but of Greeks. Thats why they are not preseved and never recognized by the Levites. Not on their historical ages.
gearzone2611 4 years ago
Who led the early christians? Did ALL the early christians chose what books should be included? They always turn their own bishops when there was theological disspute. Even to the time the bible did not existed. Also, the Bishops of the Catholic Church can trace its roots to the early christians and to the 12 Apostles.
ednardkim 4 years ago
Therefore, in your claim that the early christians chose what books should be included, it would mean to say that there was a time when the Bible did not even existed! Who were the early christians?
ednardkim 4 years ago
Catholicism is what YAHUSHUA/Jesus described as the Nicolaitans (nico/conquer + laitans/people) When a group of people replace their head (Messiah) with a counterfeit (the Pope). it is also the first white horse&rider with bow and crown in the vision of the four horsemen.
Ahav 4 years ago
In other words, don't trust your Pastor... or perhaps we won't trust you because you're a man too... or perhaps we won't trust the bible because it was just written by men including those phrases that you are quoting..
Ironic isn't it?
..
acfs1982 4 years ago
The Bible was written over a 1600 year period by over 40 different writers,most of whom never met one another. Living in different historical eras, regions and cultures, the only thing they had in common was their claim of being inspired by the one true God. One would expect to find contradictions and inconsistencies among the numerous places,people and offices mentioned by 40 different writers over 1600 years yet there are none. This is one of the most powerful arguments that it is God's word.
PaulMacGregorWhitby 4 years ago
YEs the books in the Bible are written by people inspired by God. But the question is, who decided what books should be put in the Bible? I would suggest you research the canon of the Bible. and also, are the people in the bibilical times are the only people inspired by God? No. Christ has said to Peter "whatsoever you permit in earth is permitted in heaven and what you forbid in earth is forbidden in heaven" and to his brothers " Iwll be with you until the end of Age".
ednardkim 4 years ago
a great pope.
6dollar 4 years ago 2
Cardinal Alfredo Ottoviani made the announcement. He outlived Pope Paul.
bbarz 4 years ago
descanse em paz santo padre Paulo VI
antonioaloisioneto 5 years ago