The F-14 was a great aircraft but to me the Super Hornet is a big leap above the F-14 in performance. Yes the F-14 was faster but it can't maneuver even close to what the super hornet can do. They are already working on engine upgrades for the super hornet that will not only put out more thrust but consume even less fuel. To me the Super Hornet is the best fighter. Its cheap to make compared to the F-22 and F-35 and has unbelievable pitch authority for a none thrust vectoring aircraft.
No matter what people say about the Super Hornet, I still think that it is a damn good Navy aircraft. It may not be as fast as the F-14, but it is probably easier to maintain because the F-14's swing wing mechanisms must have been expensive and a pain in the rear end for mechanics to maintain.
Less maneuverable than the legacy C model, with an inferior turn radius and inferior acceleration. All so it can carry more fuel, and bring more bombs home - a retrograde step in my opinion.
According to CDR Rob Niewoehner, (one of the Super Hornet test pilots), and I quote directly from his flight assessment - "A clean (no external stores) Lot XIX C/D will nose out a clean E/F in a drag race from 0.85 to 1.2 at 35,000 ft."
@WinchesterRanger less maneuverable? wrong. its got a bigger wingspan, and engines are more powerful for that type of lightweight. so acceleration is better than the c model.
A few facts for you then: In 1998 -- as it became clear that the Super Hornet was slower, and less agile at transonic speeds than the C/D the Navy issued an "administrative clarification" which declared that speed, acceleration and sustained turn rate were not, and had never been, Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the Super Hornet. Apparently, some misguided people thought that those were important attributes for a fighter.
Bill Sweetman, Interavia Business & Technology, February 1, 2000
That "bullshit" is a direct quote from a respected technology journal - what exactly do you have to offer in the way of facts - or does your counter-argument consist solely of yelling "bullshit"?
semi-intelligent? it's an idiot conversation about you being being biased for the F-14. No one cared that piece of shit of a plane until it got retired. Then people started to turn fanboy and start to compare other planes (most of the time, saying the other plane is crap comparing to the tomcat) Well it's a piece of shit. And that's why they got shredded and dumped in the ocean like the piece of shit they are LOL.
@Tomcatsux4ever it was an amazing, and revolutionary aircraft for its time, it simply eventually became outdated like all aircraft in the u.s military. it was still amazing at filling its role as a carrier defense fighter, just smaller, more efficient and beter capable f-18s took its place in due time.
@Tomcatsux4ever ok u rlly need 2 stop all these hate comments....have you EVER flew an F-14D Super Tomcat? i didnt think so...its an exhilarating experience....so stop being a douche....and get a life
@BDKR Nasa has experimented on the now aptly named "legacy" alpha through delta hornets with minor thrust vectoring exhaust nozzles. Very, very, very impressive displays I must say. Look it up, you should be able to find something on it.
i was just recently at the airshow in the beach in new york...seeing the f/18,thunderbirds and company over the water was pretty cool...however i perfer the blue angels
Song line-up for this demo?
sytyoklahoma 6 months ago
playing green day at an air show? the faggot band that despises America
gypsykingg 8 months ago
Respond to this video...
You do realize that American Idiot wasn't a slam at America in gerneral but at certain classes of people in America?
8BALT 5 months ago
fuck dude i hate this pilot he's such a scrub!!!!
Wawaweewaj 9 months ago
True f 14 was expensive but to redo that plane with todays technology would have made a difference. F14s owned f18
jmax07 1 year ago
@jmax07
And F-16's and F-15's own both what's your point?
8BALT 5 months ago
The F-14 was a great aircraft but to me the Super Hornet is a big leap above the F-14 in performance. Yes the F-14 was faster but it can't maneuver even close to what the super hornet can do. They are already working on engine upgrades for the super hornet that will not only put out more thrust but consume even less fuel. To me the Super Hornet is the best fighter. Its cheap to make compared to the F-22 and F-35 and has unbelievable pitch authority for a none thrust vectoring aircraft.
scupking 1 year ago
Just watched them practicing at CFB Shearwater, going to be an amazing show!
saintrobbie375 1 year ago
No matter what people say about the Super Hornet, I still think that it is a damn good Navy aircraft. It may not be as fast as the F-14, but it is probably easier to maintain because the F-14's swing wing mechanisms must have been expensive and a pain in the rear end for mechanics to maintain.
Nevertheless, both fighters ROCK!
XStormfalconX 1 year ago
@XStormfalconX yea plus it was a major fuel hog
supaman1395 1 year ago
2:05 Sounds like he tripped on his words and said "Stail tand"
SoaringEagle2005 1 year ago
Awesome!
wooka64 1 year ago
Less maneuverable than the legacy C model, with an inferior turn radius and inferior acceleration. All so it can carry more fuel, and bring more bombs home - a retrograde step in my opinion.
WinchesterRanger 2 years ago
Having flown both. This is inaccurate
beanman82 2 years ago
According to CDR Rob Niewoehner, (one of the Super Hornet test pilots), and I quote directly from his flight assessment - "A clean (no external stores) Lot XIX C/D will nose out a clean E/F in a drag race from 0.85 to 1.2 at 35,000 ft."
WinchesterRanger 2 years ago
@WinchesterRanger less maneuverable? wrong. its got a bigger wingspan, and engines are more powerful for that type of lightweight. so acceleration is better than the c model.
SuperHornetTV 1 year ago
A few facts for you then: In 1998 -- as it became clear that the Super Hornet was slower, and less agile at transonic speeds than the C/D the Navy issued an "administrative clarification" which declared that speed, acceleration and sustained turn rate were not, and had never been, Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the Super Hornet. Apparently, some misguided people thought that those were important attributes for a fighter.
Bill Sweetman, Interavia Business & Technology, February 1, 2000
WinchesterRanger 1 year ago
@WinchesterRanger Thats bullshit.
SuperHornetTV 1 year ago
That "bullshit" is a direct quote from a respected technology journal - what exactly do you have to offer in the way of facts - or does your counter-argument consist solely of yelling "bullshit"?
WinchesterRanger 1 year ago
Youre just mad because that piece of shit you call an F-14 got retired, shredded up, and got dumped in the ocean because they are pieces of shit. LOL
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
Well the conversation was semi-intelligent until this slack jawed troll rolled in.
WinchesterRanger 1 year ago
semi-intelligent? it's an idiot conversation about you being being biased for the F-14. No one cared that piece of shit of a plane until it got retired. Then people started to turn fanboy and start to compare other planes (most of the time, saying the other plane is crap comparing to the tomcat) Well it's a piece of shit. And that's why they got shredded and dumped in the ocean like the piece of shit they are LOL.
Tomcatsux4ever 1 year ago
Listen you moron, I never even mentioned the F-14, I have no idea what you're rambling on about.
WinchesterRanger 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever it was an amazing, and revolutionary aircraft for its time, it simply eventually became outdated like all aircraft in the u.s military. it was still amazing at filling its role as a carrier defense fighter, just smaller, more efficient and beter capable f-18s took its place in due time.
EpicShenanigansChuck 1 year ago
@Tomcatsux4ever ok u rlly need 2 stop all these hate comments....have you EVER flew an F-14D Super Tomcat? i didnt think so...its an exhilarating experience....so stop being a douche....and get a life
supaman1395 1 year ago 11
It can point it's nose anywhere long before the Legacy bug can. It's maneuvering is much more impressive.
kickZtailout 1 year ago
Comment removed
Viper7662 2 years ago
Comment removed
Viper7662 2 years ago
Turn and burn!
Z0ne5ive 2 years ago
Thanks for putting this up....I've been wanting to "re-live" that first high speed pass ever since that day....great show!
CLK15 2 years ago
I can't lie, its no Tomcat but still pretty damn cool, the maneuvers make you think it has thrust vectoring
F22coleman 2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Those stabilators have a serious effect on controlling this aircraft.
Give this thing thrust vectoring and it would be a world beater.
BDKR 2 years ago 3
@BDKR Nasa has experimented on the now aptly named "legacy" alpha through delta hornets with minor thrust vectoring exhaust nozzles. Very, very, very impressive displays I must say. Look it up, you should be able to find something on it.
suraxis 2 years ago
anyone got the music list for this demo?
sytyoklahoma 2 years ago
at 8:27 is that a bird?
Lovesredheads09 2 years ago
Comment removed
sytyoklahoma 2 years ago
High speed bird pass.
sytyoklahoma 2 years ago
i was just recently at the airshow in the beach in new york...seeing the f/18,thunderbirds and company over the water was pretty cool...however i perfer the blue angels
minimattau 2 years ago 2
i saw this one. it was incredible! great TACDEMO.
thunderhead121 2 years ago
sick man! i luv the f18 first taking off!
defender195 2 years ago