"we're missing small little pieces"? I'm sorry, I stopped listening after that. You're missing a shit ton of pieces, and there is no explanation for that. I don't care if you are religious/spiritual or not, evolution has so many flaws it's almost laughable. I don't know how the hell we got here, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't evolution.
@Freddy3740 OMG evolution is based on evidence and testable scientific hypotheses, whereas creationism is nothing but a philosophy! the reason why we are here today is because of evolution by natural selection (primarily)! cheers :)
@MichTR88 Mitochondrial DNA is a good starting poiny. But it's also supported by an enourmous amount of additional, suporting evidence from related fields.
Atheism has a doctorine of no consequence in evil well obvi there are evil people in this world and that there is a consequence for it so idk y so many lost people try to argue wen they are wrong evolution is from the devil he is trying to decieve u so he can get ur soul and try to keep u away from god since he rebelled. why do u think there is hate jealousy killing and everything it all comes from the devil the illuminati is real they are satanic worshipers and also god gives u free will duh
@XxDaViS10 Are you really so simple-minded and uneducated that you don't even know how to use proper punctuation and capitals so someone can readily understand just what, exactly, you are trying to say? That seems to be a trademark of many Christian undies - lack of education, travel, diction, experience, and, most of all - reasoning powers. I wonder how you are going to get through life, although, that DOES demonstrate why you think you need Jesus guiding you, I guess.
@mrchangingmankind In genisis chapter 32 verse 18&1/3 it says quite clearly " yea who soever release his seed into a young boy shall forever be the son of god"; this proves that moses NEVER crossed the desert in his ark. Dumbass!
@ytbscience why have you disabled ratings & comments to your videos? Clear evidence that you KNOW you are dead wrong; else why fear other viewpoints? Typical religitard censorship.
ALL i GOTTA SAY, IS THAT IT IS WRITTEN IN THE WORD OF GOD. THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE. READ GENESIS CHAPTER 1. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS OPEN YOUR HEART TO BELIEVE AND YOU WILL SEE THAT GOD EXIST. BUT THEN AGAIN HERE GOES ROOM FOR MORE EXCUSES MAYBE YOUR GOD IS THE WRONG GOD. WELL MAYBE EVOLUTION IS THE WRONG THEORY. BY THE WAY, ME AND YOU ARGUING HAS PROBABLY DONE NOTHING BUT CAUSE US TO BECOME MORE DISTASTEFUL IN EACHOTHERS BELIEFS. I LOVE YOU WITH THE LOVE OF CHRIST. PUT YOUR FAITH IN CHRIST?
@mrchangingmankind keep an open mind i dont have a problem with your faith , in fact religon has a peacefull pourpse to keep people from killing other people.
also think how long is a day for god is,try to think about this is eveloution to how god created us
if god is almighty, and kn ow everyrthing about me, and if he EXISTS, then he would completely understand why i didn´t believe in him, and if hes a good god, then he would forgive me.
@sinnlosernutzername7 See the thing/Information you're missing is that much like on Earth, There is order in the Spiritual World. - Satan would accuse you of receiving the Truth but not accept it, and GOD would have no choice but to let your soul go to Satan.
Satan= Prosecutor and God = Judge, Only people who have an excuse(s) are the ones who have disabilities. (This is because of the curse on earth) He knew you would deny him so he sent you here to c his Existence.
@sinnlosernutzername7 It was given to me, (revelation) from God. If God did not send His Son, Satan would have no reason to try to contaminate the Human Race (Nephilims) or Lure away the people with Deception(False Gods). Also these False Gods doctrines are very similar to the Word of God but corrupted. This is because it comes from Satan.
you don´t answer my question: WHY do you think that your god is the right one, and that satan exists, because if satan exists, that would proove that god isn´t almyghty!
Compare it to this: God create people (Good, God's Property) they rebel and become (Satan's Property) or God created Angels they fell and became (Satan's Property) Fallen Angels (Aliens). GOD gave them all free will.
You have not witnessed evolution occur either right?
You have to believe in evolution by faith alone. You have not witnessed it happening, Yet you have simply accepted one teaching over another. When you stand before God, you will have to give an account as to why you chose to deny God and his authority over you.
and on the other hand, if i say, a bottle of soda created the universe, you won´t belief it right? i have to proof it! what isthe difference betwen god an a imagine bottle of soda?
that is blind faith and blind faith is stupid. get some education. and if god is a good god, then he won´t demand people beleiving in him! see the logic, you fool?
@sinnlosernutzername7 well if what your saying is true then you should not have to highlight the so called "proof" of evolution. Well I guess I can say you have blind perception since you can't prove that you even exist. Face it when you die you will meet the creator whether you believe it or not. And besides don't worry God Does not exist so don't argue a point that is already valid.
@sinnlosernutzername7 so it is safe to say that the people saying evolution is true have blind faith since they believe it is true, but you said that NOTHING can be proven, so that means evolution has a long time to go to be proved. It is ok dont be bothered by my inquiries i just want to see if i'm missing a piece to understand evolution. Until I find that piece, I will continue to believe in my "fairy tale" JESUS CHRIST THE MOST HIGH.
at first you should know that god and evolution doens´t exlude teh other one. who told you who is god? where is go? WHAT is god? mybe god is evolution, his picture that we now have was made from humans. maybe the natural laws ARE actually god.
in fact, i don´t believe in god. this is just another,different point of view.
but the fact is, that there are MUCH more evidences and experiments and researches and hints for evolution than for a god.
@mrchangingmankind Jesus christ wasnt a fairy tale they have records of him and why do think there are crosses of him and churches are around evolution is a fairy tale also so its not true also no atheist can not answer is that the universe was not always around they its millions of years old when its not so there had to be a supreme being tht created not creating itself everything has a cause n effect so scientists dont know where the first cause was evolution can not be scientiifcally observed
@XxDaViS10 Google the Italian Wall Lizard for an example of one of the most obviously observable evolutionary developments in an animal. The rest of your claim is gibberish. You're mixing astrophysics, biology and abiogenisis, A sure sign that you don’t know what you’re talking about but simply repeating what other creationists have said.
@SpiritWorldBlog and just look at the top comment there:if you think they were ET's, you have to have a very strong proof" So people who think they were ET's they need "very strong proofs", but those who believe in God just needs to trust his word WITHOUT any proof??? Now thats huge inequallity.
if you take a mixture of liquids that contain the basic building blocks of life, you would expect to be able to see life forms forming. However science proves otherwise. Entropy teaches us that all things go from order to disorder. Evolution is a fantasy that contradicts entropy or science. If evolution were true we'd see new life forms evolving all the time. alas extinction is the norm, and so it goes with entropy.
evolution normally needs millions of years, and the first cells formed deep down in the ocean, next to undersea-vulcanos, because there are all minerals needed for a dna-molecule are in the water.
and btw, you can see evolution all around you: why you think there are black and white people?
or how would you call it, if bacterias get resistant to specific, often used medicine?
and it´s fact, that the average-size of humans increasedby 20 cm in the past 200 years
@sinnlosernutzername7 There are variations in the gene pool that were present from the creation. For example black people and white people are variations in the same specie. Life in its simplist form is way to complex for it to go from non-life to life. if life requires a 3 dimensional molecule, how did the one dimensional molecule evolve into a 2 dimensional molecule, and then into a 3 dimensional molecule? The gap is too great to be explained by natural processes.
@sinnlosernutzername7 DNA is a complicated 3 dimensional molecule. it is in a spiral form. Life cannot exist in a less complicated molecule. so the question how did it go from a soup of elements to a DNA chain? It violates science. Science shows us that random processes never go from disorder to order. Rather the opposite is true (entropy). Science disproves evolution.
@sinnlosernutzername7 When I was in the Philippines in the 80's some of the GI's were getting Gonorrhea. They stopped using penicillin and started using spectinomycin because the Gonorrhea had become penicillin resistant. When they started finding that some GI's were getting a spectinomycin resistant strain, the doctors were puzzled that penicillin cured the patient. You see there are variations, but not evolution. Nothing has ever evolved ever.
if nothing evolved ever, where do birds come from?
they have many coincidences with dinosaurs, and there are no bird fossils that are as old as dinosaurs.
at first, we have dinosaurs walking on 4 legs, later on 2 legs, some millions of years ago dinosaurs with beaks and feathers. that informations are based on fossils found.
@sinnlosernutzername7 the size of humans are growing? this is a variation, and not evolution. The same size and breed variations can be found in many species such as dogs fore example. There is much more scientific evidence to prove evolution absolutely false than there is any to support it. There are no transitional fossiles, and no evidence in the fossile record to support such a rediculous theory. Evoltution is a fairy tale and the subject of science fiction movies.
there was more food, because the humans found new technics to gain grain, and so on.
so it was no longer necessary that humans stay little, and the big humans get more children because they can work harder and better, and so slowly everyone gets bigger.
@sinnlosernutzername7 Adam and eve were created with age, and so was the earth, only 5,000 years ago. Also humans and dinosaurs lived together. You can find human footprints and dinosaur footprints fossilised together at dinosaur national park in Texas.
@sinnlosernutzername7 the river that covered the mud carried calcium which fossilised the footprints. The mud was fossilised at the same time. Skeptics have tried to argue that it was faked, but studies proved it was genuine.
@sinnlosernutzername7 Vishnu is a False God. It's a God sent by Satan. No Doubt the ancients actually saw the being. This is because Satan knows people believe things they see.
@sinnlosernutzername7 Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. And again, "The Lord knows the reasoning of the wise, that it is worthless." 1 Corinthians 3:20
Ok one thing I have to say....... neanderthal. As far as the bone structure of a neanderthal we have people today who have the same looks of a neanderthal have you seen nikolai valuev. and many things can small differences we can get from inbreeding. You need to look at the DNA. Neanderthal DNA was compard to that of 994 modern humans, 478 africans, 510 europeans, 494 asians, 167 native americans and 20 people from australia and oceania.
modern humans DNA differ among themselves by an average of 8.0(range 1-24) and the difference between modern humans and the neanderthal is 27.2(range 22-36) so actually some modern humans DNA is closer to that of a neanderthal (that lived thousands) of years ago then to that of some modern humans. So to say that a neaderthal is a different species you would have to call modern humans that are closer to the neanderthal, a neanderthal and not a modern human.
@UrielOmega Yet ANOTHER reason humans should have more than one species name. We aren't actually just one species, but several distinct species. I am as far seperated genetically from a black African as that same African is a chimp. So myself, a sub-saharan and a chimp would literally HAVE to be considered three seperate species, or chimps are people, too.
neanderthals were humans with some variations in appearance. if they weren't human why would some scientists claim there was interbreeding with humans? You cannot interbreed different species. doh.
If we have a video of a runner running in New York, and then have some more footage of him running in Paris France, then we can deduce that he must have also ran across the Atlantic Ocean, probably when it froze over.
@daNDayati ok to prove that your evolution is true, can you devise an experiment that can be observed by the scientific method that would prove evolution occurs? I'll save everyone some time, the answer is, no you cannot.
There are no transitional fossils, The evidence used as transitional fossils are merely different species. On closer examination all transitional fossils are proven false.
@daNDayati Hydrocarbons or fossil fuels are found in the middle east is the same area the Garden of Eden existed until it was covered by sediment by the Flood.
Extinction occurs since creation. There have been fossils of modern animals with prehistoric animals, such as cockroaches. Further there are fossilized dinosaur footprints in Texas along with human footprints along side them, and these footprints were fossilized at the same time. The theory of evolution sounds less supernatural than creation, but it is a belief that is taught by scientists (evangelists) and creation is taught by religion. You must choose your belief by faith, choose wisely.
im not done yet. lets look at the rapid expansion/big bang. if there was one of these how does an explosion of material that just happens to be there with no explination of how it came to be there. make anything but a mess the force behind the blast would have carried the particles to the limits of infinity and beyond, because there was no force to slow/stop these particles down. and if you say the sun, what stopped the sun from going to the edges of oblivion?
@HyperMoeMan As for your big bang comment. You obviously no very little about the big bang. The big bang clearly states that all mass in the universe was one infinitely dense clump of plasma that rapidly cooled causing it do expand outwards very quickly. All mass in the universe never STOPPED moving because in space when something is drifting without an outside force there is nothing to stop it. It slowed, because of mass drifting in opposite directions counteracting gravity.
@HyperMoeMan You cant just take the unexplained and say its god. THOUSANDS of things were unexplained a hundred years ago, but in very little time were explained due to science.
the absurd claim that apes became man is laughable at best, due to the fact that the ape has a far larger brain than a human, if it is natural selection wouldnt it stand that the larger animal with a larger brain would survive much better than one with a smaller brain? but lets look at man for a bit, man is amoral, there is nothing to stop a human from doing what he is going to do. the laws that were crated to rein in man would not have been created if god didnt exist.
@HyperMoeMan Its pretty ignorant to say ANY of that. An apes brain is larger? SHIT. Any black guy with a bigger dick than me is obviously more advanced than i am. As if one ridiculous analogy wasn't enough. Think about this way, one ape was born with a smaller, yet SMARTER brain. That had more brain functionality with quicker responses to any actions around it. While being smaller in size, it got into a fight with a big slow ape and WON by the fact of being smarter.
@DiviniusAC apes actually do have a larger cranium than a human. how does a smaller brain = smarter. one would think that a larger cranium = smarter. if humans are the best and brightest species, aka the fittest why havent birds, reptiles, and other mammals evolved to a human like state. and why hasnt the human race evolved further as a species?
@HyperMoeMan I may have to split this comment up. so bear with me. But humans are the only sentient species on earth. Our ability to reason and think using logic almost neutralizes the need for instinct. As for birds, etc. Most species are completely random. Just because humans are the most advanced species, doesnt mean other species will advance to our exact image. a bird for example. A bird maybe canceled out danger from predators that couldnt fly and had that advantage.
@HyperMoeMan please take into mind, human evolution took 4 billion years. In essence we were the lucky species that evolved to sentient state first above all animals. so birds and other animals could just not have found that evolutionary link to the next stage of their evolution. as for the size issue with the cranium. Say you have a 10 foot computer with very BASIC technology in it. And you also have a small pc with the most advanced computer technology to date. bigger =/= better.
@HyperMoeMan the brain could also be missing certain neurological components used for some of our abilities. Such as reason, etc. Evolution is a very LONG and selective process. Plus, as for your argument why havent other species advanced to human form. If one species advanced to the point where it didnt need something, it could cancel out an ecosystems stable circle of life, and may kill many other species in the process. which is why many species stay the same for quite some time.
@HyperMoeMan I appreciate the response and i love arguing whenever it comes to science :) I'm not the foremost expert on evolution but i stand by the theory.
the fact that evolution breaks some fundamental laws of physics is never explained. lets take a look at the absurd claim of transition fossils, none exists. apes are apes man is man one does not become the other. if evolution is real why did we stop at human, would we not evolve to the next level at this time and point, make radical jumps up the evolution chain as somehow the reptiles did to become mamals.
the fact that you cant go from cold blood to warm blood, no evidence exists to prove that. evolution is not true, no fossil record exists that has the fossils located in the stratum the're supposedly found in, not to mention the fact that some fossils have un digested food in them.if evolution is correct, and it takes a long time to from a fossil, then why does the food remain intact. it wouldnt it would degrade along side the animal.
Problems with fossils and evolution - 99% fossils found are complex, fully formed invertebrates, circular logic involved with evolutionists propoganda (fossils date the strata or strata dates the fossils), 'younger' fossils are found several layers under 'older' fossils and vice versa, so called 'transitional fossils' have been shown to be fakes, hoaxes, stretch of imagination, untrue, etc... Also dating fossils (circular logic), data is all over the map, inconsistent, etc...
It's weird that every person who believes in evolution claims that the ones who don't believe in evolution don't understand how natural selection. It seems to me that even evolutionists don't even understand how evolution works or even came ot be for that matter. It's the evolution natural selection of the gaps.
Research.... abiogenesis..... and also look into the miller-urey experiment , its an experiment (on going) to create life in a laboratory.
And life didnt arise from minerals, it likely came from chemical compounds...like water, ammonia, methane and hydrogen.... which made ammino acids, which form together to make proteins, which eventually turned into single cell organism. (the above experiment successfully created amino acids in a lab...but i dont think they have made proteins yet)
just because the experiment hasn't yielded complex proteins yet, doesn't mean it wont someday... and more
We can't observe life randomly forming because the conditions for forming life (like on early earth) dont exist on the planet anymore (lol , are u really this ignorant?).
They have already proven the first step possible, organic compounds (amino acids) can come from inorganic materials (h20 , ammonia, carbon, methane etc etc) naturally.
I'm not saying amino acids prove that life formed from inorganic matter, im just saying that IF life did form on its own, the change from inorganic to organic matter is required.
It's the first step to abiogenesis, and its been confirmed....the next step is now seeing if proteins can naturally form
the experiment is science, it can be recreated and observed. the theory is supported by evidence and observation, hence scientific theory
How is it based on faith?? lol, the theory is based on evidence you big dope, the opposite of faith...and the theory will change if the evidence calls for it.
Not based on facts....does the experiment not provide facts?? lol
"faith all the way" ... great??? do you have a better explanation for the origins of life.... creation?? LOL
Lemme guess, evolution is just faith 2? HELL...the theory of gravity is just faith.
Yes Abrupt Appearance & the Fact that all creatures stay the same withing there gene pool according to it's Kind, sure, you ave dogs that range from a wiener dog to a great Dane & a poodle to a Husky, but they are all Dogs & they will never evolve into something else & start manufacturing Video games & Playing them
Bacteria never evolves into something thats not bacteria, never has never will
By your logic, gravity is based on faith...there is more evidence for the theory of evolution, than there is for the theory of gravity...so if youre going to dismiss evolution...you must be logically consistent and dismiss gravity as well
lol, except genetic and fossil evidence shows us that in fact dogs evolved from wolves, who share a common ancestor with foxes then bears then racoons, then weasels, then cats
You're more than welcome to ignore the facts, it doesnt change the truth
I know you can observe facts that support gravitational theory, but by YOUR logic gravity doesnt exist....EVEN tho the facts do, learn to comprehend....learn to apply consistent logic.
Evolution has been observed, and there are more physical "facts" for it than grav. theory.
dogs and cats have no relatives? i think you mean, YOU dont know the relatives. lmao
You just saying "gravity is a fact", shows that you dont understand what the word fact means in a scientific context. moron.
I had a Dog that was 1/2 wolf 1/2 Golden retriever, Wolves just arnt domesticated & as you may have noticed different Dogs tend to have different demeaners, I dont think the two Dogs on Noahs Ark were wolves, they Had the full gene pool of ever Dog there is today within them,
do yoy think that sounds crazy, Look at what you believe, that they came from a Rock/Dirt/lifless minerals , ur a fool if you buy that story
I had a Dog that was 1/2 wolf 1/2 Golden retriever, Wolves just arnt domesticated & as you may have noticed different Dogs tend to have different demeaners, I dont think the two Dogs on Noahs Ark were wolves, they Had the full gene pool of ever Dog there is today within them,
do yoy think that sounds crazy, Look at what you believe, that they came from a Rock/Dirt/lifless minerals , ur a fool if you buy that story
Miacis cognitus which split into caniformia (dogs, bears etc) and feliformia (cats, mongoose etc)
caniformia gave rise to Hesperocyon (first canid) which spawned hesperocyonine (first canids)
which gave way to Canis lepophagus (likley the most direct ancestor of modern canines) and then Canis edwardii (first animal recognizable as a wolf)...which changed into modern dogs, wolfs etc.
canine evo. is very complex, I likely made mistakes. the fossil record is also spotty, but consistent.
Miacis cognitus which split into caniformia (dogs, bears etc) and feliformia (cats, mongoose etc)
caniformia gave rise to Hesperocyon (first canid) which spawned hesperocyonine (first canids)
which gave way to Canis lepophagus (likley the most direct ancestor of modern canines) and then Canis edwardii (first animal recognizable as a wolf)...which changed into modern dogs, wolfs etc.
canine evo. is very complex, I likely made mistakes. the fossil record is also spotty, but consistent.
@DataSe7en Did it ever occur to you those are just vaarieties of Dogs
Considering the diversity of Dogs we have today...
I ment just think if those whippet Dogs were extinct,(look like minerature greayhounds)
Evolutionist would say thoses were before your hesperocyon,
Cynodictis, Hesperocyon and Cynodesmus are varieties of Dog,
Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. cont.........
@DataSe7en Did it ever occur to you those are just vaarieties of Dogs
Considering the diversity of Dogs we have today...
I ment just think if those whippet Dogs were extinct,(look like minerature greayhounds)
Evolutionist would say thoses were before your hesperocyon,
Cynodictis, Hesperocyon and Cynodesmus are varieties of Dog,
Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. cont.........
@ncwdane Cont...Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. This would require a sudden shift between dog and bear with apparently nothing in between.
Some Evilutionist will claim punctuated equilibrium,
but that would literally require a dog giving birth to a bear.
@DataSe7en Re; " rapid spouts of evolution happen over like, a period of a few million years, opposed to like 25 million years...not over a single generation"
THATS NEVER BEEN REPLICATED OR OBSERVED IN A LABLORTORY OR OBSERVED IN NATURE,
(BASED 100% ON FAITH) & I would safely say , never happened, never will !!!!
as for finding a dog before your extinct Dog, all kinds of tools & artifacts & misplaced fossils have been found, NO NOBEL prizes,Coelacanths have been found alive & well=busted
Of course its not been observed, because animals dont give birth to another species. "rapid" evolution is happening as we speak, just very slowly. Some evolution can be observed in real time, but not rapid macroevolution, it takes too long...you'd be dead before you could classify it as macroevolution.
but it can be seen in fossils and DNA
Please explain how Coelacanths make evolution busted? we thought it was extinct and then realized it wasn't.
Yes Coelacanths fossils are millions of years old...some are 100 thousand years old, some are 100 years old, some are 10 years old, and some are 1 year old.
Previously we thought they were extinct, but they're not...the fact that they're still living doesn't change the fact that they were living millions of years ago...this does not disprove evolution..it has nothing to do with evolution.
Yes evolution would be disproved, if the fossils predated its ancestor, but thats not the case
Too stupid for science? Try religion.
kriss299 2 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Has anyone noticed that more intelligent people gravitate away from religion. Religious people should take a hint.
kriss299 2 hours ago
"we're missing small little pieces"? I'm sorry, I stopped listening after that. You're missing a shit ton of pieces, and there is no explanation for that. I don't care if you are religious/spiritual or not, evolution has so many flaws it's almost laughable. I don't know how the hell we got here, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't evolution.
Freddy3740 1 week ago
@Freddy3740 OMG evolution is based on evidence and testable scientific hypotheses, whereas creationism is nothing but a philosophy! the reason why we are here today is because of evolution by natural selection (primarily)! cheers :)
alexcoric 1 week ago
Ahh shit religious people say some stupid things, good video
avenmcspavens 1 week ago
@XxDaViS10 once again, another idiot who thinks he knows something... Why do some vaccines not work anymore? Because the bacteria EVOLVED idiot!
tjtheplay 2 weeks ago 3
What is the very best evidence for evolution?
MichTR88 3 weeks ago
@MichTR88 Mitochondrial DNA is a good starting poiny. But it's also supported by an enourmous amount of additional, suporting evidence from related fields.
venomfanex 2 weeks ago
Atheism has a doctorine of no consequence in evil well obvi there are evil people in this world and that there is a consequence for it so idk y so many lost people try to argue wen they are wrong evolution is from the devil he is trying to decieve u so he can get ur soul and try to keep u away from god since he rebelled. why do u think there is hate jealousy killing and everything it all comes from the devil the illuminati is real they are satanic worshipers and also god gives u free will duh
XxDaViS10 1 month ago
@XxDaViS10 Are you really so simple-minded and uneducated that you don't even know how to use proper punctuation and capitals so someone can readily understand just what, exactly, you are trying to say? That seems to be a trademark of many Christian undies - lack of education, travel, diction, experience, and, most of all - reasoning powers. I wonder how you are going to get through life, although, that DOES demonstrate why you think you need Jesus guiding you, I guess.
zideffil 11 hours ago
@mrchangingmankind In genisis chapter 32 verse 18&1/3 it says quite clearly " yea who soever release his seed into a young boy shall forever be the son of god"; this proves that moses NEVER crossed the desert in his ark. Dumbass!
jimbocidman 1 month ago
@ytbscience why have you disabled ratings & comments to your videos? Clear evidence that you KNOW you are dead wrong; else why fear other viewpoints? Typical religitard censorship.
jimbocidman 1 month ago
ALL i GOTTA SAY, IS THAT IT IS WRITTEN IN THE WORD OF GOD. THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE. READ GENESIS CHAPTER 1. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS OPEN YOUR HEART TO BELIEVE AND YOU WILL SEE THAT GOD EXIST. BUT THEN AGAIN HERE GOES ROOM FOR MORE EXCUSES MAYBE YOUR GOD IS THE WRONG GOD. WELL MAYBE EVOLUTION IS THE WRONG THEORY. BY THE WAY, ME AND YOU ARGUING HAS PROBABLY DONE NOTHING BUT CAUSE US TO BECOME MORE DISTASTEFUL IN EACHOTHERS BELIEFS. I LOVE YOU WITH THE LOVE OF CHRIST. PUT YOUR FAITH IN CHRIST?
mrchangingmankind 1 month ago
@mrchangingmankind keep an open mind i dont have a problem with your faith , in fact religon has a peacefull pourpse to keep people from killing other people.
also think how long is a day for god is,try to think about this is eveloution to how god created us
645jmf 1 month ago
Comment removed
mrchangingmankind 1 month ago
Find out why Evolution is Stupid, watch this video:
watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
The Neanderthals(that clearly weren't human) were the Nephilim.
-Humans are Spirit, Soul and Body
-Animals/Apes are Spirit and Body (Notice No soul/No accountability)
Evolution Is A DECEPTION.
Know More - Google or Ysearch: Spirit World Blog and click on Label: Evolution
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
can you prove that we have a soul and apes not? this is so insanely stupid and no prove.
and this website isnt very reputable and trustworthy
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 evolution is stupid, science proves evolution false.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii omg, no! you are a religious dickhead with closed mind
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 only ignorant people believe in evolution. Mathematicians know evolution is false. watch?v=hEDYr_fgcP8
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
so you say, most of the educated world is ignorant? and all the intellectuals?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 Sure, MAN has moral conscience which comes from the Soul.
Apes/Animals act on Instincts. We HUMANS make a decision every second.
Also, there was an experiment conducted by MC DOUGALL
who stumbled on the biblical truth of the SOUL.
"Not only do we have a Soul, but it's a gift given only to Humans."
Visit the Blog and Search Label: Soul
And if that doesn't prove it, in death you will know. - Too late, but you will know.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
if god is almighty, and kn ow everyrthing about me, and if he EXISTS, then he would completely understand why i didn´t believe in him, and if hes a good god, then he would forgive me.
see? i mustn´t have fear!
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 See the thing/Information you're missing is that much like on Earth, There is order in the Spiritual World. - Satan would accuse you of receiving the Truth but not accept it, and GOD would have no choice but to let your soul go to Satan.
Satan= Prosecutor and God = Judge, Only people who have an excuse(s) are the ones who have disabilities. (This is because of the curse on earth) He knew you would deny him so he sent you here to c his Existence.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
so god isnt´t almighty?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
and why are you so sure that you worship the right god? there are millions of them!
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 This is because the "millions" of other Gods were sent by Satan to lure Mankind away from the Truth of ONE GOD. (One = Trinity)
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
from where do you know that?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 It was given to me, (revelation) from God. If God did not send His Son, Satan would have no reason to try to contaminate the Human Race (Nephilims) or Lure away the people with Deception(False Gods). Also these False Gods doctrines are very similar to the Word of God but corrupted. This is because it comes from Satan.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
you don´t answer my question: WHY do you think that your god is the right one, and that satan exists, because if satan exists, that would proove that god isn´t almyghty!
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 God created Lucifer (Cherubim) not Satan. -He rebelled.
Compare it to this: God create people (Good, God's Property) they rebel and become (Satan's Property) or God created Angels they fell and became (Satan's Property) Fallen Angels (Aliens). GOD gave them all free will.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
r u serious? :O ALIEENS???!!!
ROFL AHAHAHAHAA ;D , you must be a trolll...
or extremely retarded.
and god isn´t a good god if he let satan torture hundreds of billions of people.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 Nope, look it up Ysearch: Ancient Fallen Aliens
Your questions are answered there.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
this film goes 40 minutes! i will not waste my tiime to this bullshit.
but just because it is on youtube, it isn´t true. anciant angel-aliens, pff, that is hilarious.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 You don't believe in God because you cannot see him right?
You have not witnessed evolution occur either right?
You have to believe in evolution by faith alone. You have not witnessed it happening, Yet you have simply accepted one teaching over another. When you stand before God, you will have to give an account as to why you chose to deny God and his authority over you.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
we have so MANY proves for evolution, you fool!
and on the other hand, if i say, a bottle of soda created the universe, you won´t belief it right? i have to proof it! what isthe difference betwen god an a imagine bottle of soda?
that is blind faith and blind faith is stupid. get some education. and if god is a good god, then he won´t demand people beleiving in him! see the logic, you fool?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 well if what your saying is true then you should not have to highlight the so called "proof" of evolution. Well I guess I can say you have blind perception since you can't prove that you even exist. Face it when you die you will meet the creator whether you believe it or not. And besides don't worry God Does not exist so don't argue a point that is already valid.
mrchangingmankind 1 month ago
@mrchangingmankind
wait... i don´t get your point. maybe my english is not good enough. are you now accepting evolution or not?
and you are right in this point. nothing, really NOTHING can be ever proven.
there can be only be unsure evidences, but the theorie of evolution have very much evidences and makes most sense.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 so it is safe to say that the people saying evolution is true have blind faith since they believe it is true, but you said that NOTHING can be proven, so that means evolution has a long time to go to be proved. It is ok dont be bothered by my inquiries i just want to see if i'm missing a piece to understand evolution. Until I find that piece, I will continue to believe in my "fairy tale" JESUS CHRIST THE MOST HIGH.
mrchangingmankind 1 month ago
@mrchangingmankind
at first you should know that god and evolution doens´t exlude teh other one. who told you who is god? where is go? WHAT is god? mybe god is evolution, his picture that we now have was made from humans. maybe the natural laws ARE actually god.
in fact, i don´t believe in god. this is just another,different point of view.
but the fact is, that there are MUCH more evidences and experiments and researches and hints for evolution than for a god.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@mrchangingmankind and even if god is true, what makes you sure taht you have the right god? there are MILLIONS of other gods.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@mrchangingmankind Jesus christ wasnt a fairy tale they have records of him and why do think there are crosses of him and churches are around evolution is a fairy tale also so its not true also no atheist can not answer is that the universe was not always around they its millions of years old when its not so there had to be a supreme being tht created not creating itself everything has a cause n effect so scientists dont know where the first cause was evolution can not be scientiifcally observed
XxDaViS10 1 month ago
@XxDaViS10 Google the Italian Wall Lizard for an example of one of the most obviously observable evolutionary developments in an animal. The rest of your claim is gibberish. You're mixing astrophysics, biology and abiogenisis, A sure sign that you don’t know what you’re talking about but simply repeating what other creationists have said.
venomfanex 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpiritWorldBlog and just look at the top comment there:if you think they were ET's, you have to have a very strong proof" So people who think they were ET's they need "very strong proofs", but those who believe in God just needs to trust his word WITHOUT any proof??? Now thats huge inequallity.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpiritWorldBlog and you still doesn´t answer my question:
hy am i a prove for the existence of god`? why can´t ,for example, vishnu, crated the human race? or the evolution?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 I don't believe you prove the existence of a soul using science, so no proof there sorry.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
so apes show social competence too. in fact, they are the only animals who are able too lie
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
and the dna of apes and humans is 97% the same
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
if you take a mixture of liquids that contain the basic building blocks of life, you would expect to be able to see life forms forming. However science proves otherwise. Entropy teaches us that all things go from order to disorder. Evolution is a fantasy that contradicts entropy or science. If evolution were true we'd see new life forms evolving all the time. alas extinction is the norm, and so it goes with entropy.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
evolution normally needs millions of years, and the first cells formed deep down in the ocean, next to undersea-vulcanos, because there are all minerals needed for a dna-molecule are in the water.
and btw, you can see evolution all around you: why you think there are black and white people?
or how would you call it, if bacterias get resistant to specific, often used medicine?
and it´s fact, that the average-size of humans increasedby 20 cm in the past 200 years
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 There are variations in the gene pool that were present from the creation. For example black people and white people are variations in the same specie. Life in its simplist form is way to complex for it to go from non-life to life. if life requires a 3 dimensional molecule, how did the one dimensional molecule evolve into a 2 dimensional molecule, and then into a 3 dimensional molecule? The gap is too great to be explained by natural processes.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
i don´t know what you´re taklking about.
molecules always are 3 dimensional. just take the water molecul.
and the evolution has so many million years to produce a single cell. from that point evolution works faster.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 DNA is a complicated 3 dimensional molecule. it is in a spiral form. Life cannot exist in a less complicated molecule. so the question how did it go from a soup of elements to a DNA chain? It violates science. Science shows us that random processes never go from disorder to order. Rather the opposite is true (entropy). Science disproves evolution.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 When I was in the Philippines in the 80's some of the GI's were getting Gonorrhea. They stopped using penicillin and started using spectinomycin because the Gonorrhea had become penicillin resistant. When they started finding that some GI's were getting a spectinomycin resistant strain, the doctors were puzzled that penicillin cured the patient. You see there are variations, but not evolution. Nothing has ever evolved ever.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
if nothing evolved ever, where do birds come from?
they have many coincidences with dinosaurs, and there are no bird fossils that are as old as dinosaurs.
at first, we have dinosaurs walking on 4 legs, later on 2 legs, some millions of years ago dinosaurs with beaks and feathers. that informations are based on fossils found.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 evolution is stupid watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
i don´t have the time to watch this, but reading the comments is enough.
you are retarded as fuck.
people like you make all the other nations think, that americans are stupid.
(they aren´t, but in the people like you make the world think so)
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
just look at the archeopterix ( i don´t know if it´s the same in english)
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 archaeopteryx was a bird, not a reptile as falsely claimed.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
who told you so? and what is with other dinosaurs with feathers and BEAKS
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 the size of humans are growing? this is a variation, and not evolution. The same size and breed variations can be found in many species such as dogs fore example. There is much more scientific evidence to prove evolution absolutely false than there is any to support it. There are no transitional fossiles, and no evidence in the fossile record to support such a rediculous theory. Evoltution is a fairy tale and the subject of science fiction movies.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
this is evolution!
there was more food, because the humans found new technics to gain grain, and so on.
so it was no longer necessary that humans stay little, and the big humans get more children because they can work harder and better, and so slowly everyone gets bigger.
that is natural selectiona and evolution.
douchebag
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
so you would say, that humans always existed in the past billion years, if there is no evolution?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 Adam and eve were created with age, and so was the earth, only 5,000 years ago. Also humans and dinosaurs lived together. You can find human footprints and dinosaur footprints fossilised together at dinosaur national park in Texas.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
omg, RETARDED AS FUCK!!
C14 method has proven, that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, and that the earth in fact is billions of years old. -_-
and those footprints don´t prove anything. they can be faked, and if they are real, that doesn´t means that they are from the same age.
can you prove adam and eve? NO, you can´t because they never existed.
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 if you just the video you'll see C14 doesn't work. Dating known objects have proven C14 is wrong.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
do you you mean the vulcano thing?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 the river that covered the mud carried calcium which fossilised the footprints. The mud was fossilised at the same time. Skeptics have tried to argue that it was faked, but studies proved it was genuine.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 have you seen evolution? You are the RETARD! Believing a story that you cannot see, so you can deny a story about God.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
we can see it in fossils, in experiments, in radiocarbon-dating,
but do we have fossils of god :D ? tsss
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 if this were true there'd be new life forms forming all the time. Alas, this is not the case.
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
omg, retarded as fuck -_-
THIS-PROCESS-NEEDS-MILLIONS-OF-YEARS!
it happens but we don´t notice, because we live not long enough!
people like you are the reason why half world thinks that americans aree stupid.
(in fact, they aren´t, but you are)
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 You are being Deceived! -Darwin Himself would tell you that.
Search: Spirit World Blog and click label: Evolution
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
do you ask darwin?
and i don´t go to yourstupid fundamentalisic blog.
even the name: Spirit World Blog, pff
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 That's fine, but I gave you the Information.
It's call Spirit World Blog because ALL our natural world is shaped by the Spiritual World.
You arguing with me = Spirit of Error (You) arguing with Spirit of Truth (Me) = Conflict.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
now you are only claiming things, without prove them. the picture at 1:46 shows you
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 That's actually you.
Proven by God:
they have ears, but cannot hear - Psalm 135:17
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
wait? why am i a prove for the existence of god`? why can´t ,for example, vishnu, crated the human race? or the evolution?
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 Vishnu is a False God. It's a God sent by Satan. No Doubt the ancients actually saw the being. This is because Satan knows people believe things they see.
SpiritWorldBlog 1 month ago
@SpiritWorldBlog
what ancients? what makes you sure w´that vishnu is a false god? you still doesn´t answer my question. because you have no answer
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@sinnlosernutzername7 Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. And again, "The Lord knows the reasoning of the wise, that it is worthless." 1 Corinthians 3:20
water2gashawaii 1 month ago
@water2gashawaii
i don´t wanna hear stupid quotes from a stupid book, i want to hear proves!
sinnlosernutzername7 1 month ago
@wesleywt
Men and woman actually have the same amount of ribs...
GarethLW1893 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GarethLW1893 I assume you don't do sarcasm :p
wesleywt 2 months ago
Comment removed
GarethLW1893 2 months ago
Ok one thing I have to say....... neanderthal. As far as the bone structure of a neanderthal we have people today who have the same looks of a neanderthal have you seen nikolai valuev. and many things can small differences we can get from inbreeding. You need to look at the DNA. Neanderthal DNA was compard to that of 994 modern humans, 478 africans, 510 europeans, 494 asians, 167 native americans and 20 people from australia and oceania.
UrielOmega 2 months ago
modern humans DNA differ among themselves by an average of 8.0(range 1-24) and the difference between modern humans and the neanderthal is 27.2(range 22-36) so actually some modern humans DNA is closer to that of a neanderthal (that lived thousands) of years ago then to that of some modern humans. So to say that a neaderthal is a different species you would have to call modern humans that are closer to the neanderthal, a neanderthal and not a modern human.
UrielOmega 2 months ago
@UrielOmega Yet ANOTHER reason humans should have more than one species name. We aren't actually just one species, but several distinct species. I am as far seperated genetically from a black African as that same African is a chimp. So myself, a sub-saharan and a chimp would literally HAVE to be considered three seperate species, or chimps are people, too.
gvman3670 2 months ago
@gvman3670 And that is what leads to racism.
UrielOmega 2 months ago
@UrielOmega SO? What, are hurt feelings more important than the truth?
Besides, thinking individuals can see and acknowledge our differences without hate, right?
gvman3670 2 months ago
check out some kent hovind seminars
ybuzhduha 2 months ago
@ybuzhduha Check out Hovind's mailing address. He's in prison until 2015. He's a charlatan, a fraud, and a criminal. What he's not is a scientist.
ndrthrdr1 2 months ago
evolution is false see: watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ&feature=related
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
Not one transitional fossil exists proof watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ&feature=related
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
neanderthals were humans with some variations in appearance. if they weren't human why would some scientists claim there was interbreeding with humans? You cannot interbreed different species. doh.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
If we have a video of a runner running in New York, and then have some more footage of him running in Paris France, then we can deduce that he must have also ran across the Atlantic Ocean, probably when it froze over.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
Comment removed
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
@daNDayati Ridicule is the first and last argument of a fool - Charles Simmons
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
@daNDayati ok to prove that your evolution is true, can you devise an experiment that can be observed by the scientific method that would prove evolution occurs? I'll save everyone some time, the answer is, no you cannot.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
@water2gashawaii Italian Wall Lizzard.
gamesbok 2 months ago
@daNDayati your assumption of my mental state is as errant as your belief in evolution.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
@daNDayati ah, ridicule, when you cannot refute the facts, you resort to ridicule.
see this: watch?v=uKu059GCucU&feature=related
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
Famous Atheist gets honest about the integrated complexity argument see watch?v=uKu059GCucU&feature=related
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
There are no transitional fossils, The evidence used as transitional fossils are merely different species. On closer examination all transitional fossils are proven false.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
@daNDayati Hydrocarbons or fossil fuels are found in the middle east is the same area the Garden of Eden existed until it was covered by sediment by the Flood.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
Extinction occurs since creation. There have been fossils of modern animals with prehistoric animals, such as cockroaches. Further there are fossilized dinosaur footprints in Texas along with human footprints along side them, and these footprints were fossilized at the same time. The theory of evolution sounds less supernatural than creation, but it is a belief that is taught by scientists (evangelists) and creation is taught by religion. You must choose your belief by faith, choose wisely.
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
see this article ww w.icr. org/article/6416/ (remove spaces)
water2gashawaii 2 months ago
Quiet wrong there Pedro. Evolution is only a theory, not a fact. Quit getting so bent about it.
There are laws in the universe, such like Gravity and so on.
But there's an interesting one called "law of cause and effect" - All effect must have a cause.
Evolution does not have a effect, because there was no cause.
Hope you understand this simple thing.
vsbladz 2 months ago
And kind of prefer this quote from someone far more educated than you in the myth of evolution. from a NOTED Paleontologist!
Randy L. Wysong D.V.M
"The more one studies paleontology, the more certain
one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone."
The Creation-Evolution Controversy (1976), p.31
shwminist 5 months ago
im not done yet. lets look at the rapid expansion/big bang. if there was one of these how does an explosion of material that just happens to be there with no explination of how it came to be there. make anything but a mess the force behind the blast would have carried the particles to the limits of infinity and beyond, because there was no force to slow/stop these particles down. and if you say the sun, what stopped the sun from going to the edges of oblivion?
HyperMoeMan 5 months ago
@HyperMoeMan As for your big bang comment. You obviously no very little about the big bang. The big bang clearly states that all mass in the universe was one infinitely dense clump of plasma that rapidly cooled causing it do expand outwards very quickly. All mass in the universe never STOPPED moving because in space when something is drifting without an outside force there is nothing to stop it. It slowed, because of mass drifting in opposite directions counteracting gravity.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
@HyperMoeMan You cant just take the unexplained and say its god. THOUSANDS of things were unexplained a hundred years ago, but in very little time were explained due to science.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
the absurd claim that apes became man is laughable at best, due to the fact that the ape has a far larger brain than a human, if it is natural selection wouldnt it stand that the larger animal with a larger brain would survive much better than one with a smaller brain? but lets look at man for a bit, man is amoral, there is nothing to stop a human from doing what he is going to do. the laws that were crated to rein in man would not have been created if god didnt exist.
HyperMoeMan 5 months ago
@HyperMoeMan Its pretty ignorant to say ANY of that. An apes brain is larger? SHIT. Any black guy with a bigger dick than me is obviously more advanced than i am. As if one ridiculous analogy wasn't enough. Think about this way, one ape was born with a smaller, yet SMARTER brain. That had more brain functionality with quicker responses to any actions around it. While being smaller in size, it got into a fight with a big slow ape and WON by the fact of being smarter.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
@DiviniusAC apes actually do have a larger cranium than a human. how does a smaller brain = smarter. one would think that a larger cranium = smarter. if humans are the best and brightest species, aka the fittest why havent birds, reptiles, and other mammals evolved to a human like state. and why hasnt the human race evolved further as a species?
HyperMoeMan 4 months ago
@HyperMoeMan I may have to split this comment up. so bear with me. But humans are the only sentient species on earth. Our ability to reason and think using logic almost neutralizes the need for instinct. As for birds, etc. Most species are completely random. Just because humans are the most advanced species, doesnt mean other species will advance to our exact image. a bird for example. A bird maybe canceled out danger from predators that couldnt fly and had that advantage.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
@HyperMoeMan please take into mind, human evolution took 4 billion years. In essence we were the lucky species that evolved to sentient state first above all animals. so birds and other animals could just not have found that evolutionary link to the next stage of their evolution. as for the size issue with the cranium. Say you have a 10 foot computer with very BASIC technology in it. And you also have a small pc with the most advanced computer technology to date. bigger =/= better.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
@HyperMoeMan the brain could also be missing certain neurological components used for some of our abilities. Such as reason, etc. Evolution is a very LONG and selective process. Plus, as for your argument why havent other species advanced to human form. If one species advanced to the point where it didnt need something, it could cancel out an ecosystems stable circle of life, and may kill many other species in the process. which is why many species stay the same for quite some time.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
@HyperMoeMan I appreciate the response and i love arguing whenever it comes to science :) I'm not the foremost expert on evolution but i stand by the theory.
DiviniusAC 4 months ago
the fact that evolution breaks some fundamental laws of physics is never explained. lets take a look at the absurd claim of transition fossils, none exists. apes are apes man is man one does not become the other. if evolution is real why did we stop at human, would we not evolve to the next level at this time and point, make radical jumps up the evolution chain as somehow the reptiles did to become mamals.
HyperMoeMan 5 months ago
the fact that you cant go from cold blood to warm blood, no evidence exists to prove that. evolution is not true, no fossil record exists that has the fossils located in the stratum the're supposedly found in, not to mention the fact that some fossils have un digested food in them.if evolution is correct, and it takes a long time to from a fossil, then why does the food remain intact. it wouldnt it would degrade along side the animal.
HyperMoeMan 5 months ago
finally someone who can give a good argument for evolution.
blackbite50 5 months ago
I think it's the horse fossil record that is the best example of a transitional fossil record because we have pretty much all of them
Lampsmahari 5 months ago
Problems with fossils and evolution - 99% fossils found are complex, fully formed invertebrates, circular logic involved with evolutionists propoganda (fossils date the strata or strata dates the fossils), 'younger' fossils are found several layers under 'older' fossils and vice versa, so called 'transitional fossils' have been shown to be fakes, hoaxes, stretch of imagination, untrue, etc... Also dating fossils (circular logic), data is all over the map, inconsistent, etc...
CiscoWes 5 months ago
@CiscoWes Bones of dead creatures were planted into the ground to make up that evolution was true?
Are you joking?
Really, asess what you just said.
You must be fucking retarded.
aidan21 5 months ago
It's weird that every person who believes in evolution claims that the ones who don't believe in evolution don't understand how natural selection. It seems to me that even evolutionists don't even understand how evolution works or even came ot be for that matter. It's the evolution natural selection of the gaps.
EndOfNumbers 5 months ago 2
Evolution is horse shit and so are you
trunative85 5 months ago
what minerals evolved into the 1st Lifeform & how did the lifeless minerals do that ? :-/
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Research.... abiogenesis..... and also look into the miller-urey experiment , its an experiment (on going) to create life in a laboratory.
And life didnt arise from minerals, it likely came from chemical compounds...like water, ammonia, methane and hydrogen.... which made ammino acids, which form together to make proteins, which eventually turned into single cell organism. (the above experiment successfully created amino acids in a lab...but i dont think they have made proteins yet)
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Yeah, I have looked into Abiogenisis, & it's a Far cry from creating Life,
it only makes some buiding Blocks of Life, Not even close to creatian a lifeform w/ DNA that replicates itself
Life from non-life has never happened from Scratch or from lifelesas materials
Not even observed in nature thoughwe have millions of Life forms
even the fossil record is sudden appearance from evolutionist views, Trilobites are complex,
God made each accrding to its Kind fits the evidence
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
just because the experiment hasn't yielded complex proteins yet, doesn't mean it wont someday... and more
We can't observe life randomly forming because the conditions for forming life (like on early earth) dont exist on the planet anymore (lol , are u really this ignorant?).
They have already proven the first step possible, organic compounds (amino acids) can come from inorganic materials (h20 , ammonia, carbon, methane etc etc) naturally.
W/e, fill the gaps with god. idc anymore.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en What you've just done, is pointed out that your theory is based on Faith
Not Facts, & certainly NOT Facts of science,
FAITH All the way !!!!
NO NO NO Amino Acids is so fron Life it isnt funny !!!
Turning clay into bricks, isnt building a finctional house w/ electricity & Working appliances
& to be frank, Amino acids isnt even close to that example
I think your mosunderstanding of just how complex & loaded w/ informatuion aDNA & a single cell is your ignorant problem
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
I never said amino acids were close to life, lol
I'm not saying amino acids prove that life formed from inorganic matter, im just saying that IF life did form on its own, the change from inorganic to organic matter is required.
It's the first step to abiogenesis, and its been confirmed....the next step is now seeing if proteins can naturally form
the experiment is science, it can be recreated and observed. the theory is supported by evidence and observation, hence scientific theory
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Continue...
How is it based on faith?? lol, the theory is based on evidence you big dope, the opposite of faith...and the theory will change if the evidence calls for it.
Not based on facts....does the experiment not provide facts?? lol
"faith all the way" ... great??? do you have a better explanation for the origins of life.... creation?? LOL
Lemme guess, evolution is just faith 2? HELL...the theory of gravity is just faith.
you're an idiot.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Gravity is not based on Faith
Look who's the Moron !!!
Theory does NOT = science or fact
Yes Abrupt Appearance & the Fact that all creatures stay the same withing there gene pool according to it's Kind, sure, you ave dogs that range from a wiener dog to a great Dane & a poodle to a Husky, but they are all Dogs & they will never evolve into something else & start manufacturing Video games & Playing them
Bacteria never evolves into something thats not bacteria, never has never will
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
By your logic, gravity is based on faith...there is more evidence for the theory of evolution, than there is for the theory of gravity...so if youre going to dismiss evolution...you must be logically consistent and dismiss gravity as well
lol, except genetic and fossil evidence shows us that in fact dogs evolved from wolves, who share a common ancestor with foxes then bears then racoons, then weasels, then cats
You're more than welcome to ignore the facts, it doesnt change the truth
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Continue....
There is a difference between theory and scientific theory, learn the difference, dont be naive.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en "Naive" you're the one saying Evolution is more fact than Gravity...
God is as Obvious as Gravity
& Evolutions, never been duplicated in a Lab, or happened in front of anybody
The fossil record would not have any creature more at one particular stage than at all the other stages combined
YET it is that way for EVERY Creature, Dogs & Cats Have no Relatives, all the Dogs came from 2 Dogs
(yes/wolves are Dogs)
if you cant admit Gravity's a Fact, No wonder you dont know God's a Fact
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
I know you can observe facts that support gravitational theory, but by YOUR logic gravity doesnt exist....EVEN tho the facts do, learn to comprehend....learn to apply consistent logic.
Evolution has been observed, and there are more physical "facts" for it than grav. theory.
dogs and cats have no relatives? i think you mean, YOU dont know the relatives. lmao
You just saying "gravity is a fact", shows that you dont understand what the word fact means in a scientific context. moron.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Continue...
And i think you mean all dogs are wolves...all wolves are certainly not dogs. nooooob. you dont understand anything
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en NO....!!! You dont understand !!!
I had a Dog that was 1/2 wolf 1/2 Golden retriever, Wolves just arnt domesticated & as you may have noticed different Dogs tend to have different demeaners, I dont think the two Dogs on Noahs Ark were wolves, they Had the full gene pool of ever Dog there is today within them,
do yoy think that sounds crazy, Look at what you believe, that they came from a Rock/Dirt/lifless minerals , ur a fool if you buy that story
ncwdane 5 months ago
@DataSe7en NO....!!! You dont understand !!!
I had a Dog that was 1/2 wolf 1/2 Golden retriever, Wolves just arnt domesticated & as you may have noticed different Dogs tend to have different demeaners, I dont think the two Dogs on Noahs Ark were wolves, they Had the full gene pool of ever Dog there is today within them,
do yoy think that sounds crazy, Look at what you believe, that they came from a Rock/Dirt/lifless minerals , ur a fool if you buy that story
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Dogs fall into the sub species canis lupus familiaris & canis lupus dingo, all wolfs fall into separate sub specie categories.
They're the same species, but they have their differences...which is why you could say you have a "half dog half wolf".
So... "(yes/wolves are Dogs)" , would be technically incorrect...as clearly all wolfs are not the same sub species.
but great job ignoring my main point... we still have evidence cats and dogs evolved lol...despite you ignoring it.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en well then your quasi evidence is flawed
Man can categorize all he wants, God made each creature according to it's Kind
Golden retrievers & Wolves are both of the same :KIND"
thats why they can Mate, I didnt say A my dog was 1/2 dog 1/2 wolf. I said it was 1/2 Golden retriever 1/2 wolf,
both are from the dog family, NOT to be confused w/ the cat family
Luck dogs arnt extinct, of the dumbphuq evolution community wout say chiwawas were Cambrian, then poodles then great Danes evolved
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Lol, i love how you ignore the actual point....again.
(I clearly said dogs and wolves were of the same species, but not without difference...dont put words into my mouth to further your point)
Yup, this is getting a little dumb. so...lets cut to the last point of conflict...
We clearly have genetic and fossil evidence showing the evolution of dogs, from another species that is not a dog.... how do YOU address this?
Stop dancing around and answer the question.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en your the one that keeps sidestepping points & twisting things
anyways, No we do Not have any found fossils that are less evolved the todays Dogs that are ancistors of todays Dogs that evolved into todays Dogs,
(do you have a photo for which fossil find or creature you are soeaking of) ?
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Miacis cognitus which split into caniformia (dogs, bears etc) and feliformia (cats, mongoose etc)
caniformia gave rise to Hesperocyon (first canid) which spawned hesperocyonine (first canids)
which gave way to Canis lepophagus (likley the most direct ancestor of modern canines) and then Canis edwardii (first animal recognizable as a wolf)...which changed into modern dogs, wolfs etc.
canine evo. is very complex, I likely made mistakes. the fossil record is also spotty, but consistent.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Miacis cognitus which split into caniformia (dogs, bears etc) and feliformia (cats, mongoose etc)
caniformia gave rise to Hesperocyon (first canid) which spawned hesperocyonine (first canids)
which gave way to Canis lepophagus (likley the most direct ancestor of modern canines) and then Canis edwardii (first animal recognizable as a wolf)...which changed into modern dogs, wolfs etc.
canine evo. is very complex, I likely made mistakes. the fossil record is also spotty, but consistent.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Continued....
Primitive wolfs...Canis edwardii , Canis dirus , Canis lepophagus, Canis armbrusteri if you go any further back, they aren't considered wolfs anymore.
Btw, in my previous message, you should switch around Canis lepophagus and Canis edwardii.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Continued....
Primitive wolfs...Canis edwardii , Canis dirus , Canis lepophagus, Canis armbrusteri if you go any further back, they aren't considered wolfs anymore.
Btw, in my previous message, you should switch around Canis lepophagus and Canis edwardii.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
And hesperocyon is the first Canidae , not canid, lol.
I'm not very familiar with wolf evolution... Im more familiar with whales and humans.
but I think i've made my point.
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Did it ever occur to you those are just vaarieties of Dogs
Considering the diversity of Dogs we have today...
I ment just think if those whippet Dogs were extinct,(look like minerature greayhounds)
Evolutionist would say thoses were before your hesperocyon,
Cynodictis, Hesperocyon and Cynodesmus are varieties of Dog,
Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. cont.........
ncwdane 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Did it ever occur to you those are just vaarieties of Dogs
Considering the diversity of Dogs we have today...
I ment just think if those whippet Dogs were extinct,(look like minerature greayhounds)
Evolutionist would say thoses were before your hesperocyon,
Cynodictis, Hesperocyon and Cynodesmus are varieties of Dog,
Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. cont.........
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane Cont...Ursavus was a variety of bear with no real evidence of any relationship with Cynodictis and Hesperocyon. There are significant differences. This would require a sudden shift between dog and bear with apparently nothing in between.
Some Evilutionist will claim punctuated equilibrium,
but that would literally require a dog giving birth to a bear.
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Punctuated equilibrium, yes. (although im not familiar with the event you're talking of).
nothing in evolution states evolution must happen @ the same pace all around the world
But, rapid spouts of evolution happen over like, a period of a few million years, opposed to like 25 million years...not over a single generation
If you found any dogs before a Hesperocyon, then that would prove evolution incorrect and you'd get a nobel prize.
those animals are not just varieties, thats fact
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Re; " rapid spouts of evolution happen over like, a period of a few million years, opposed to like 25 million years...not over a single generation"
THATS NEVER BEEN REPLICATED OR OBSERVED IN A LABLORTORY OR OBSERVED IN NATURE,
(BASED 100% ON FAITH) & I would safely say , never happened, never will !!!!
as for finding a dog before your extinct Dog, all kinds of tools & artifacts & misplaced fossils have been found, NO NOBEL prizes,Coelacanths have been found alive & well=busted
ncwdane 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Of course its not been observed, because animals dont give birth to another species. "rapid" evolution is happening as we speak, just very slowly. Some evolution can be observed in real time, but not rapid macroevolution, it takes too long...you'd be dead before you could classify it as macroevolution.
but it can be seen in fossils and DNA
Please explain how Coelacanths make evolution busted? we thought it was extinct and then realized it wasn't.
How does that disprove evolution....
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@DataSe7en Coelacanth, ALive today, & yet fossils they said were 75 million years old,
same concept of what you said IF I FOUND A DOG OLDER THAN " Hesperocyon" evolutions disproved ! ;-)
Also Evolutionist keep flip flopping how youve done here, saying evolutions slow, then you say Evolutions Fast.
Look, there is NOT ONE Kind of animal that all its so called transitional forms out number the ONE metamorphic stage we find them at !!!
the opposite would be true if Evolution were so !!!!
ncwdane 5 months ago
Comment removed
DataSe7en 5 months ago
Comment removed
DataSe7en 5 months ago
@ncwdane
Yes Coelacanths fossils are millions of years old...some are 100 thousand years old, some are 100 years old, some are 10 years old, and some are 1 year old.
Previously we thought they were extinct, but they're not...the fact that they're still living doesn't change the fact that they were living millions of years ago...this does not disprove evolution..it has nothing to do with evolution.
Yes evolution would be disproved, if the fossils predated its ancestor, but thats not the case
DataSe7en 5 months ago